Arkansas
Arkansas Landlord-Tenant Recording Laws: Cameras, Audio, and Privacy Rights (2026)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 15, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 9, 2026. · 3 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

In Arkansas, both landlords and tenants may record conversations they participate in without notifying the other party, under the one-party consent rule in Ark. Code Ann. 5-60-120. Landlords may not install hidden cameras inside a rental unit, but tenants may place cameras inside their own unit and at their doors, subject to lease restrictions.
The landlord-tenant relationship in Arkansas frequently involves questions about recording rights. Tenants want to document conversations about repairs, record evidence of harassment or illegal entry, and install security cameras for safety. Landlords want to monitor common areas for security, document property conditions, and protect their investment. Arkansas law provides a framework for both parties, rooted in the one-party consent statute (Ark. Code 5-60-120), the video voyeurism statute (Ark. Code 5-16-101), and the Arkansas Residential Landlord-Tenant Act.
This guide covers every major recording scenario in the landlord-tenant context.
Tenant Recording Rights
Recording Conversations with Your Landlord
Under Arkansas one-party consent law, you can record any conversation with your landlord, property manager, or maintenance staff without their knowledge or permission. This applies to:
- In-person conversations at the property
- Phone calls about repairs, lease terms, or disputes
- Video calls through any platform
- Conversations with maintenance workers who enter your unit
As long as you are a participant in the conversation, your consent is sufficient. You do not need to inform the landlord that the conversation is being recorded.
Why Tenants Record Landlord Interactions
Recording interactions with your landlord can be valuable in several situations:
- Documenting repair requests. When you report a maintenance issue verbally, a recording creates proof that you notified the landlord and establishes a timeline.
- Preserving verbal agreements. Landlords sometimes make verbal promises about repairs, rent adjustments, or lease modifications that they later deny.
- Recording harassment. If your landlord engages in harassment, intimidation, or discriminatory behavior, recordings provide direct evidence.
- Documenting illegal entry. If your landlord enters your unit without proper notice (as required by the lease or Arkansas law), recordings can establish the violation.
- Eviction disputes. Recordings of interactions leading up to an eviction can support your defense if the eviction is challenged as retaliatory or improper.
Installing Security Cameras in Your Rental
Tenants generally have the right to install security cameras inside their own rental units. You can place cameras in:
- Your living room, kitchen, and hallway
- Pointed at your front door (interior or exterior-facing peephole cameras)
- At windows facing public areas
There are important limitations:
- Lease restrictions. Your lease may prohibit modifications to the property, and some camera installations (drilling holes, mounting hardware) could violate these provisions.
- Shared spaces. In a multi-unit building, you generally cannot install cameras in hallways, lobbies, or other common areas without the landlord's permission.
- Audio capture. Security cameras with audio capability must comply with one-party consent rules. Audio recording of conversations in hallways or common areas that you are not participating in could violate Ark. Code 5-60-120.
Doorbell Cameras
Tenants can generally use doorbell cameras (Ring, Nest, etc.) at their apartment or rental home entrance. However, in multi-unit buildings, check with your landlord about mounting requirements and whether the camera's field of view captures other tenants' doorways or private areas.
Landlord Recording Rights

Security Cameras in Common Areas
Landlords can install security cameras in common areas of multi-unit properties for legitimate security purposes. Appropriate locations include:
- Building entrances and exits
- Hallways and corridors
- Parking lots and garages
- Laundry rooms
- Mail areas
- Recreation areas and pools
- Building exteriors
These cameras serve legitimate security interests including theft prevention, vandalism documentation, and tenant safety.
Where Landlords Cannot Place Cameras
Landlords are strictly prohibited from placing cameras in:
- Inside tenant units. A tenant's rental unit is their private home, and landlords cannot install cameras inside without the tenant's knowledge and explicit consent.
- Bathrooms and restrooms in any location
- Inside any space where tenants have a reasonable expectation of privacy
A landlord who installs hidden cameras inside a tenant's unit violates Ark. Code 5-16-101 and faces Class D felony charges with up to 6 years in prison for a first or second offense.
Recording Conversations with Tenants
Landlords can record their own conversations with tenants under the same one-party consent framework. A landlord who participates in a conversation about rent, repairs, lease terms, or any other topic can record that conversation without informing the tenant.
Landlords may find this useful for:
- Documenting maintenance requests and the responses provided
- Recording lease negotiations
- Preserving evidence in disputes about property conditions
- Documenting tenant complaints or behavior issues
Property Inspections and Move-In/Move-Out Documentation
Landlords can record video of property conditions during inspections, move-in walkthroughs, and move-out assessments. This footage can be valuable for security deposit disputes. If the landlord is conducting the walkthrough with the tenant present, recording the interaction (including audio) is permitted under one-party consent.
Security Deposit Disputes and Recording Evidence

How Recordings Help
Security deposit disputes are one of the most common landlord-tenant conflicts in Arkansas. Recordings can help both parties:
- Move-in video: A video walkthrough documenting the property's condition at the start of the lease establishes a baseline.
- Move-out video: A similar walkthrough at lease end documents the condition at departure.
- Comparison evidence: Side-by-side comparison of move-in and move-out footage can resolve disputes about damage vs. normal wear and tear.
Arkansas Security Deposit Law
Under Ark. Code 18-16-305, landlords must return security deposits within 60 days after the tenant moves out. The landlord may withhold amounts for unpaid rent or damages beyond normal wear and tear. If the landlord wrongfully withholds the deposit, Ark. Code 18-16-306 lets the tenant recover the wrongfully withheld amount, damages equal to twice the amount wrongfully withheld, costs, and reasonable attorney's fees, unless the landlord shows the noncompliance resulted from an unintentional error or a good-faith dispute over the amount due.
Video evidence of property conditions can be decisive in these disputes. Courts routinely accept video walkthroughs as evidence of property condition.
Illegal Entry and Recording

Arkansas Law on Landlord Entry
Arkansas does not have a comprehensive statutory framework for landlord entry comparable to some other states. Entry rights are primarily governed by the lease agreement. Most leases require landlords to provide reasonable notice (typically 24 hours) before entering a tenant's unit, except in emergencies.
Recording Unauthorized Entry
If your landlord enters your rental unit without proper notice or permission, security cameras inside your unit can document the unauthorized entry. This footage serves as evidence for:
- Lease violation claims
- Invasion of privacy claims
- Harassment documentation
- Requests for lease termination
- Law enforcement reports if the entry constitutes trespassing
Motion-Activated Cameras
Tenants who are concerned about unauthorized entry often use motion-activated cameras that begin recording when movement is detected. These cameras conserve storage while capturing any entry into the unit, authorized or otherwise.
Eviction Proceedings and Recording
Recording as Evidence in Eviction Cases
Both landlords and tenants can use recordings as evidence in eviction proceedings in Arkansas.
Landlords may use recordings to show:
- Lease violations documented on camera
- Noise complaints supported by audio or video evidence
- Property damage captured by security cameras
- Non-payment discussions where the tenant acknowledged the debt
Tenants may use recordings to show:
- Retaliatory eviction following repair requests
- Discriminatory statements by the landlord
- Failure to maintain the property (recorded during inspections)
- Verbal agreements that modify lease terms
Admissibility Standards
Recordings used in eviction cases must be:
- Legally obtained (compliant with one-party consent or public recording principles)
- Authenticated (the party offering it must establish it is genuine)
- Relevant to the dispute
Fair Housing and Recording
Documenting Discrimination
Tenants who believe they are experiencing housing discrimination can record interactions with landlords as evidence. Under the Fair Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 3601 et seq.), it is illegal to discriminate in housing based on race, color, religion, sex, national origin, familial status, or disability.
The Arkansas Fair Housing Commission and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) both accept recordings as evidence in discrimination complaints.
What to Record
If you suspect discrimination, recordings of the following may be relevant:
- Comments about your race, religion, family status, or disability
- Different treatment compared to other tenants
- Refusal to rent based on protected characteristics
- Failure to provide reasonable accommodations for disabilities
- Retaliatory actions after you file a discrimination complaint
Practical Tips for Landlords
Developing a Camera Policy
Landlords who install security cameras in multi-unit properties should:
- Post visible signage indicating that video surveillance is in use
- Include camera disclosure in the lease so tenants are aware before signing
- Limit cameras to common areas and never place them in or pointed at tenant windows
- Disable audio recording on common area cameras to avoid potential wiretapping issues
- Establish a data retention policy for how long footage is stored
- Restrict access to footage to authorized personnel only
Responding to Tenant Camera Installations
When a tenant installs their own cameras:
- Review the lease for provisions about modifications or equipment installation
- If the camera does not damage the property and is inside the unit, it is generally the tenant's right
- If the camera is pointed at other tenants' units or common areas, discuss adjusting the angle
- Consider whether the tenant has a legitimate security concern that you should address
Practical Tips for Tenants
Before You Record
- Check your lease. Look for clauses about recording, modifications, or security equipment.
- Know your rights. Arkansas one-party consent law allows you to record your own conversations.
- Use your own device. Record on your personal phone or camera, not on your landlord's equipment.
- Preserve originals. Keep unedited copies of all recordings in a secure location.
If You Find a Hidden Camera
If you discover a hidden camera in your rental unit:
- Do not remove it. It is evidence of a crime.
- Document it. Photograph the camera and its location.
- Call the police. File a report for violation of Ark. Code 5-16-101.
- Contact an attorney. You may have civil claims for invasion of privacy and emotional distress.
- Notify the landlord in writing. If you believe the landlord installed it, document your notification.
Explore More Arkansas Recording Law Topics
Audio Recording | Video Recording | Voyeurism Laws | Workplace Recording | Recording Police | Phone Call Recording | Security Cameras | Recording in Public | Landlord-Tenant | Dashcam Laws | School Recording | Medical Recording
Back to Arkansas Recording Laws
More Arkansas Recording Topics
More Arkansas Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I record conversations with my landlord in Arkansas?
Yes. Arkansas is a one-party consent state under Ark. Code 5-60-120. You can record any conversation with your landlord, property manager, or maintenance staff that you participate in without informing them. This applies to in-person conversations, phone calls, and video calls.
Can my landlord install cameras inside my apartment in Arkansas?
No. A landlord who installs cameras inside a tenant's rental unit without consent violates Ark. Code 5-16-101. This is a Class D felony carrying up to six years in prison. Landlords can install cameras in common areas of the building but never inside individual units.
Can I put a security camera at my apartment door in Arkansas?
Generally yes. Tenants can install security cameras pointed at their own door, either inside the unit facing out or as a doorbell camera. In multi-unit buildings, check with your landlord about mounting restrictions and ensure the camera does not capture other tenants' private spaces.
Can landlord security camera footage be used in eviction cases?
Yes. Legally obtained security camera footage from common areas is admissible as evidence in Arkansas eviction proceedings. The footage must be authenticated and relevant to the dispute. Both landlords and tenants can use recording evidence in eviction cases.
What should I do if I find a hidden camera in my rental unit?
Do not remove the camera. Photograph it and its location, then contact local law enforcement to file a report. The installation of hidden cameras in a rental unit violates Ark. Code 5-16-101 and is a Class D felony. Consult an attorney about potential civil claims for invasion of privacy.
Updates
Fixed four broken Arkansas statute citation links (Ark. Code 5-60-120, 5-16-101, 18-16-305, and 18-16-306); the security-deposit remedy figures they support (60-day refund window, double damages for wrongful withholding) were independently re-verified against live statute text and confirmed accurate.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected the security deposit citation from Ark. Code 18-16-304 (which only caps the deposit amount at two months' rent) to Ark. Code 18-16-305, the section that actually sets the 60-day refund deadline, permitted withholdings, and the wrongful-withholding remedy, and updated the matching Sources entry (also removing a duplicate competitor-site citation).
Split the security-deposit paragraph's citation: the 60-day return deadline and permitted-withholding rule remain cited to Ark. Code 18-16-305, while the wrongful-withholding remedy (double damages, costs, attorney's fees, good-faith-dispute defense) is now correctly attributed to Ark. Code 18-16-306, with a matching Sources-box entry added.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Spoke propagation: Swapped all Justia Arkansas statute links (§ 5-16-101, § 5-60-120, § 18-16-304) to primary arkleg.state.ar.us sources. Updated domain and is_gov fields in SourcesList accordingly. No substantive law changes needed.
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Arkansas Code of 1987 Annotated
§ 5-60-120Interception and recording.In forcecited in 17 of our articles
(a) It is unlawful for a person to intercept a wire, landline, oral, telephonic communication, or wireless communication, and to record or possess a recording of the communication unless the person is a party to the communication or one (1) of the parties to the communication has given prior…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at arkleg.state.ar.us
Cited in 10 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2022
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Lewis v. State (1999) applied Section 5-60-120(a) to a man who taped his ex-wife's calls without being a party or having consent, affirming revocation. Elliott v. State (1998) held that while such recording by a private citizen is unlawful, the statute does not bar the tape from evidence.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Lewis v. State (Supreme Court of Arkansas 1999, 336 Ark. 469)✓A man on probation admitted attaching a recorder to the telephone box outside his ex-wife's house and taping her calls; the court found that violated Section 5-60-120(a) because he was not a party and no party consented, and affirmed the revocation.
- Opinion No. (Arkansas Attorney General Reports 1998)“…consented to the recording. This provision is set forth in A.C.A. § 5-60-120 , as follows: 5-60-120 . Interceptio…”
- King v. State (Supreme Court of Arkansas 2019, 571 S.W.3d 476)✓A friend's phone app secretly recorded a murder suspect's call with a detective; the court held that although Section 5-60-120 makes such a recording by a non-party unlawful, it does not bar admissibility, and affirmed the refusal to exclude the tape.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Arkansas Recording Laws (2026): One-Party Consent Rules, Arkansas Audio Recording Laws: One-Party Consent Rules and Penalties (2026), Arkansas Dashcam Laws: Mounting, Audio, and Legal Uses (2026)
§ 18-16-305Refund required — Exceptions.In force
(a)(1) Within sixty (60) days of termination of the tenancy, property or money held by the landlord as security shall be returned to the tenant. (2) However, the money may be applied to the payment of accrued unpaid rent and any damages which the landlord has suffered by reason of the tenant's…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2020-11-06 · Read the full text in our law library
§ 18-16-306Remedies.In force
(a)(1) If the landlord fails to comply with this subchapter, the tenant may recover: (A) The property and money due him or her; (B) Damages in an amount equal to two (2) times the amount wrongfully withheld; (C) Costs;…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2020-11-06 · Read the full text in our law library
§ 5-16-101Crime of video voyeurism.In forcecited in 9 of our articles
(a) It is unlawful for a person to use a camera, videotape, photo- optical, photoelectric, or other image recording device for the purpose of secretly observing, viewing, photographing, filming, or videotaping another person who is present in a residence, place of business, school, or other structu
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at arkleg.state.ar.us
Cited in 5 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2023
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Courts have applied the video voyeurism statute in Devries (2019), where children had a reasonable expectation of privacy behind closed bedroom and bathroom doors in a parent's home, and in Powell (2020), holding the crime is complete on using a camera for the prohibited purpose even if the images are never viewed.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Opinion No. (Arkansas Attorney General Reports 2001)“…tice of the surveillance would also negate any violation of A.C.A. § 5-16-101 , which criminalizes "video voyeurism."…”
- Bruce Wayne Devries v. State of Arkansas (Court of Appeals of Arkansas 2019, 2019 Ark. App. 478)✓One adopted daughter testified she caught Devries watching her through the bathroom window and found a baby monitor in her bathroom and bedroom; another caught him filming under her door. The court affirmed the video voyeurism convictions, rejecting his no-privacy-at-home claim.
- Robert Powell v. State of Arkansas (Court of Appeals of Arkansas 2020, 605 S.W.3d 532)✓Powell hid a camera in a fake outlet in a cabin he rented to a family and argued he could not be guilty because police took the SD card before he viewed the footage; the court held the statute punishes using a camera for that secret purpose, so never watching is no defense.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Arkansas Workplace Recording Laws: Employee and Employer Rights (2026), Arkansas Video Recording Laws: Public Filming, Private Property, and Consent (2026), Arkansas Voyeurism Laws: Hidden Cameras, Penalties, and Defenses (2026)
United States Code Title 18
§ 2511Interception and disclosure of wire, oral, or electronic communications prohibitedIn forcecited in 422 of our articles
Except as otherwise specifically provided in this chapter any person who— intentionally intercepts, endeavors to intercept, or procures any other person to intercept or endeavor to intercept, any wire, oral, or electronic communication; intentionally uses, endeavors to use, or procures any other person to use or endeavor to use any electronic, mechanical, or other device to intercept any oral communication when— such device is affixed to, or otherwise transmits a signal through, a wire, cable, or other like connection used in wire communication; or such device transmits communications by radio, or interferes with the transmission of such communication; or such person knows, or has reason to know, that such device or any component thereof has been sent through the mail or transported in interstate or foreign commerce; or such use or endeavor to use (A) takes place on the premises of any business or other commercial establishment the operations of which affect interstate or foreign commerce; or (B) obtains or is for the purpose of obtaining information relating to the operations of any business or other commercial establishment the operations of which affect interstate or foreign…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 2,045 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Griggs-Ryan v. Smith (1990) applied the Section 2511(2)(d) prior-consent exception, treating a tenant repeatedly told that all incoming calls were taped as having impliedly consented. United States v. United States District Court (1972) read the then-current Section 2511(3) as conferring no presidential surveillance power.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Mitchell v. Forsyth (Supreme Court of the United States 1985, 472 U.S. 511)✓The Attorney General authorized a warrantless 1970 national security wiretap that caught the plaintiff's calls; the Court held the since-repealed Section 2511(3) disclaimer left the tap lawful under Title III, and that Mitchell had qualified immunity.
- United States v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan (Supreme Court of the United States 1972, 407 U.S. 297)✓The Attorney General approved warrantless wiretaps on members of a domestic group accused of bombing a CIA office; the Court read Section 2511(3) as a congressional disclaimer conferring no surveillance power, then held the Fourth Amendment required prior judicial approval.
- Forsyth v. Barr (Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit 1994, 19 F.3d 1527)✓Dallas police used, in an internal affairs probe of an officer, calls private parties allegedly intercepted illegally; assuming that was unlawful, the Fifth Circuit held Section 2517(1) and (2) allowed the disclosure and use, defeating the Section 2511(1)(c) and (d) claims.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Connecticut Recording Laws (2026): Hybrid Consent Rules Explained, Oregon Recording Laws (2026): Hybrid One-Party and All-Party Rules, US Recording Laws by State (2026): All 50 States Explained
United States Code Title 42
§ 3601Declaration of policyIn force
It is the policy of the United States to provide, within constitutional limitations, for fair housing throughout the United States.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 2,522 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp. (Supreme Court of the United States 1977, 429 U.S. 252)“…Amendment and the Fair Housing Act of 1968, 82 Stat. 81 , 42 U. S. C. § 3601 et seq. Following a bench trial, the…”
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human Resources (Supreme Court of the United States 2001, 532 U.S. 598)“…r Housing Amendments Act of 1988 (FHAA), 102 Stat. 1619 , 42 U. S. C. § 3601 et seq., and the Americans with Disa…”
- Gladstone, Realtors v. Village of Bellwood (Supreme Court of the United States 1979, 441 U.S. 91)“…f the Civil Rights Act of 1968, 82 Stat. 81 , as amended, 42 U. S. C. § 3601 et seq., commonly known as the Fair…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Ark. Code 5-60-120 - Interception and Recording(law.justia.com)
- Ark. Code 5-16-101 - Crime of Video Voyeurism(law.justia.com)
- HUD - Fair Housing Act Overview(hud.gov).gov
- Arkansas Attorney General(arkansasag.gov).gov
- Arkansas General Assembly(arkleg.state.ar.us).gov
- 18 U.S.C. 2511 - Federal Wiretap Act(law.cornell.edu)
- Ark. Code 18-16-305 - Security Deposit Refund Required(law.justia.com)
- Ark. Code 18-16-306 - Remedies (Tenant Recovery for Wrongful Withholding)(law.justia.com)