Arkansas
Arkansas Voyeurism Laws: Hidden Cameras, Penalties, and Defenses (2026)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 15, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 7, 2026. · 5 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Arkansas criminalizes video voyeurism under Ark. Code Ann. 5-16-101, which creates two distinct offenses. Secret observation or recording in a private area is a Class D felony for a first or second offense, carrying up to six years in prison, and escalates to a Class C felony for a third or subsequent offense.
Arkansas takes video voyeurism seriously, imposing felony-level criminal penalties on individuals who use cameras or recording devices to secretly observe or record others in private settings. The primary statute is Ark. Code 5-16-101, which addresses two distinct categories of voyeuristic conduct and assigns different penalty levels to each.
This guide provides a comprehensive analysis of Arkansas voyeurism law, including the elements of each offense, the penalties, common scenarios, defenses, and the civil remedies available to victims.
What Is Video Voyeurism Under Arkansas Law?
Video voyeurism in Arkansas is defined by Ark. Code 5-16-101 and involves two separate criminal offenses. Both center on the use of recording or image-capturing technology to secretly observe or record someone in a setting where they have a reasonable expectation of privacy.
Section 5-16-101(a): Secret Observation or Recording in Private Areas
The first and more serious offense is defined in subsection (a). It is unlawful for any person to use a camera, videotape, photo-optical, photo-electric, or any image recording device for the purpose of secretly observing, photographing, filming, or videotaping another person in a private area where the person being recorded:
- Has a reasonable expectation of privacy, and
- Has not consented to the observation or recording
The key elements prosecutors must prove are: (1) the use of an image-capturing device, (2) the intent to secretly observe or record, (3) the victim was in a private area with a reasonable expectation of privacy, and (4) the victim did not consent.
Section 5-16-101(b): Secret Recording of Another Person's Body
The second offense addresses using concealed equipment to secretly record another person's body in situations where the person has a reasonable expectation of bodily privacy. This subsection targets conduct such as "upskirt" recordings, hidden cameras aimed at undressing individuals, and similar invasions of bodily privacy.
The distinction between subsections (a) and (b) is significant because the penalties differ substantially. Subsection (a) carries felony penalties, while subsection (b) starts as a Class B misdemeanor but escalates to a Class A misdemeanor when the offender distributes or posts the recording, or has a prior conviction under the section.
Penalties for Voyeurism in Arkansas
Felony Penalties Under Section 5-16-101(a)
The penalties for video voyeurism under subsection (a) escalate with repeat offenses.
First or second offense:
- Class D felony
- Up to 6 years in prison under Ark. Code 5-4-401
- Fines as determined by Ark. Code 5-4-201
Victim under 14 years of age:
- Class C felony even for a first offense (3 to 10 years), a carve-out written into Ark. Code 5-16-101 itself
Third or subsequent offense:
- Class C felony
- 3 to 10 years in prison
- Fines up to $10,000 under Ark. Code 5-4-201 (the same statutory maximum as the Class D felony tier -- only the classification and prison range escalate, not the fine cap)
A Class D felony conviction in Arkansas carries significant collateral consequences beyond imprisonment. These include a permanent felony record, potential loss of voting rights during incarceration, restrictions on firearm ownership, and difficulty obtaining employment, housing, and professional licenses.
Misdemeanor Penalty Under Section 5-16-101(b)
Secret body recording:
- Class B misdemeanor
- Up to 90 days in jail
- Fine up to $1,000
While the misdemeanor classification might seem relatively light, a conviction still creates a criminal record and carries lasting personal and professional consequences.
Penalty Comparison Table
| Offense | Statute | Classification | Maximum Imprisonment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Secret observation/recording in private area (1st/2nd) | 5-16-101(a) | Class D felony | Up to 6 years |
| Secret observation/recording in private area (3rd+, or victim under 14) | 5-16-101(a) | Class C felony | 3 to 10 years |
| Secret recording of body | 5-16-101(b) | Class B misdemeanor (Class A if distributed/posted or prior conviction) | Up to 90 days (up to 1 year for Class A) |
Where Do People Have a Reasonable Expectation of Privacy?

The concept of "reasonable expectation of privacy" is central to the voyeurism statute. Arkansas courts assess whether a reasonable person in the victim's position would have expected privacy in the particular location and circumstances.
Locations That Typically Qualify
The following locations are almost always considered areas where a person has a reasonable expectation of privacy:
- Bathrooms and restrooms in homes, businesses, and public facilities
- Locker rooms in gyms, schools, swimming pools, and athletic facilities
- Changing rooms and fitting rooms in retail stores
- Bedrooms and private sleeping areas
- Hotel and motel rooms
- Medical examination rooms and patient treatment areas
- Tanning booths and spa treatment rooms
- Private offices with closed doors (in certain circumstances)
Locations That Typically Do Not Qualify
Areas where a person would not reasonably expect privacy generally include:
- Public streets and sidewalks
- Retail store sales floors
- Open-plan office spaces
- Parking lots
- Public parks and recreation areas
- Building lobbies and common hallways
Gray Areas
Some locations fall into a gray area depending on the circumstances. A cubicle in an open office may or may not carry a reasonable expectation of privacy depending on its layout and the norms of the workplace. A shared dormitory room might raise different expectations than a single-occupancy bedroom.
Common Scenarios and How the Law Applies
Hidden Cameras in Bathrooms
Installing a hidden camera in a bathroom, whether in a private home, a workplace, or a public restroom, is one of the most straightforward violations of Ark. Code 5-16-101(a). The victim is in a space where privacy expectations are at their highest, and the use of a recording device to secretly observe them is a Class D felony.
Hidden Cameras in Bedrooms
Placing a hidden camera in a bedroom to record sexual activity or nudity without the other person's consent falls squarely within the statute. This is true even if the person installing the camera owns the home or rents the bedroom. Property ownership does not override the other person's reasonable expectation of privacy in that space.
Upskirt or Downblouse Recordings
Using a concealed camera or phone to record beneath a person's clothing or down their shirt constitutes a violation of Section 5-16-101(b) at minimum. Depending on the circumstances, prosecutors may also charge under subsection (a) if the recording occurred in a private setting.
Peeping Through Windows
Using a camera or recording device to peer through windows into a person's home, even from a public space or from your own adjacent property, can violate the voyeurism statute. The person inside their home has a reasonable expectation of privacy, and using technology to defeat that privacy is the exact conduct the statute targets.
Nanny Cameras and In-Home Recordings
Homeowners who install cameras inside their own home for security purposes (often called "nanny cams") generally do not violate the voyeurism statute when cameras are placed in common areas like living rooms, kitchens, and hallways. Placing cameras in bathrooms, guest bedrooms, or other areas where a guest or caretaker would reasonably expect privacy carries real legal risk and is not recommended, though the statute's exemption for "security monitoring operated by or at the direction of an occupant of a residence" (Ark. Code 5-16-101(d)(2)) creates some ambiguity about its outer limits that Arkansas courts have not resolved.
Spy Cameras in Rental Properties
A landlord who installs hidden cameras inside a tenant's rental unit violates Ark. Code 5-16-101. The tenant has a reasonable expectation of privacy inside their own home, and the landlord's ownership of the property does not authorize secret surveillance of the tenant.
Consent as a Defense

Consent is the primary defense to a voyeurism charge under Ark. Code 5-16-101. If the person being recorded knowingly and voluntarily agreed to be observed or recorded, the conduct does not violate the statute.
What Constitutes Valid Consent?
Consent must be:
- Voluntary: Given freely, without coercion, threats, or deception
- Informed: The person must understand that they are being recorded or observed
- Specific: Consent to be recorded in one context (such as a professional photo shoot) does not extend to secret recordings in private moments
When Consent Is Not Valid
Consent obtained through deception, intoxication, or duress is not valid under Arkansas law. If a person agrees to be filmed for one purpose and the recorder secretly uses the footage for another, the original consent does not shield the recorder from liability.
Similarly, consent from a minor cannot validate voyeuristic recording. Additional child exploitation statutes may apply when minors are involved, carrying even harsher penalties.
Sex Offender Registration
Depending on the specific charges and circumstances, a conviction for video voyeurism in Arkansas may require registration as a sex offender under the Arkansas Sex Offender Registration Act (Ark. Code 12-12-903 et seq.). Whether registration is required depends on the specific offense, the court's determination, and whether the offense involved a minor.
Sex offender registration carries its own set of long-term consequences, including restrictions on where you can live and work, regular reporting requirements, and public listing on the state's sex offender registry maintained by the Arkansas Department of Public Safety.
Civil Remedies for Victims

Victims of voyeurism in Arkansas are not limited to criminal prosecution. They can also pursue civil lawsuits against the offender to recover damages.
Invasion of Privacy
Arkansas recognizes the tort of intrusion upon seclusion. A victim can file a civil lawsuit claiming that the offender intentionally intruded upon their private affairs in a manner that would be highly offensive to a reasonable person. Successful claims can result in compensatory damages for emotional distress, humiliation, and other harm.
Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress
If the voyeuristic conduct is sufficiently extreme and outrageous, the victim may bring a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress. This requires showing that the offender's conduct was so extreme as to go beyond all possible bounds of decency.
Distribution of Intimate Images (NCII and Deepfakes)
If the offender distributes the voyeuristic recordings, additional legal theories may apply. Ark. Code Ann. § 5-26-314 addresses non-consensual distribution of sexual images (NCII), creating both criminal liability and a civil cause of action. Note: § 5-26-314 does not on its face reach AI-generated deepfake intimate content.
Arkansas's first comprehensive deepfake statute is Ark. Code Ann. § 5-14-139, created by HB 1529 / Act 827 of 2025 and signed by Governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders on April 17, 2025. It targets synthetic or manipulated intimate images -- Class A misdemeanor for a first offense, Class D felony for any subsequent offense -- and includes a private right of action for actual damages and reasonable attorney fees.
At the federal level, the TAKE IT DOWN Act (Pub. L. No. 119-12, signed May 19, 2025) criminalizes the knowing publication of NCII including AI deepfakes and imposes a 48-hour notice-and-takedown duty on covered platforms effective May 19, 2026.
Federal Civil Remedies
In cases involving electronic interception, the federal Wiretap Act (18 U.S.C. 2520) provides statutory damages of at least $10,000, plus punitive damages and attorney fees.
How Arkansas Voyeurism Law Compares to Federal Law
Federal law addresses voyeurism through 18 U.S.C. 1801, the Video Voyeurism Prevention Act of 2004. This federal statute applies specifically to conduct occurring on federal property, including military installations, federal buildings, and lands controlled by the federal government.
The federal statute prohibits capturing an image of a private area of an individual without their consent, knowingly doing so under circumstances in which the individual has a reasonable expectation of privacy. Violations carry up to one year in federal prison for a first offense.
In most cases, Arkansas state law provides the primary basis for prosecution because the conduct occurs on state or private property. Federal law applies when the conduct occurs on federal land within Arkansas, such as military bases (for example, Little Rock Air Force Base) or federal courthouses.
Relationship to Other Arkansas Statutes
Ark. Code 5-60-120: Wiretapping
If the voyeuristic recording captures audio, the offender may also face charges under the wiretapping statute (Ark. Code 5-60-120). Illegal audio interception is a Class A misdemeanor carrying up to one year in jail and a $2,500 fine.
Ark. Code 5-27-605: Sexual Exploitation of Children
If the victim of voyeurism is a minor, additional charges under Ark. Code 5-27-605 (distributing, possessing, or viewing sexually explicit material involving a child) may apply. These offenses carry significantly heavier penalties, including Class B felony charges with up to 20 years in prison.
Ark. Code 5-26-314: Non-Consensual Distribution of Sexual Images
If voyeuristic images or recordings are shared or distributed, the offender may face additional charges under the state's revenge porn statute, which carries its own penalties separate from the voyeurism statute.
Reporting Voyeurism in Arkansas
If you believe you are a victim of voyeurism in Arkansas, you should:
-
Contact local law enforcement immediately. File a police report and provide any evidence you have, including descriptions of the suspected recording device, photographs of the device if you found one, and any other relevant information.
-
Do not disturb the evidence. If you discover a hidden camera, do not remove or destroy it. Law enforcement will want to examine it and collect it as evidence.
-
Document everything. Write down when and where you discovered the device, who had access to the area, and any other relevant details.
-
Contact a victim advocate. The Arkansas Crime Victims Reparation Board and local victim services organizations can provide support and connect you with resources.
-
Consult an attorney. A lawyer experienced in privacy law can advise you on both criminal prosecution and civil remedies.
Explore More Arkansas Recording Law Topics
Audio Recording | Video Recording | Voyeurism Laws | Workplace Recording | Recording Police | Phone Call Recording | Security Cameras | Recording in Public | Landlord-Tenant | Dashcam Laws | School Recording | Medical Recording
Back to Arkansas Recording Laws
More Arkansas Recording Topics
More Arkansas Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Is video voyeurism a felony in Arkansas?
Yes. Under Ark. Code 5-16-101(a), video voyeurism is a Class D felony for a first or second offense, carrying up to six years in prison. A third or subsequent offense is a Class C felony with three to ten years in prison. Secret body recording under subsection (b) is a Class B misdemeanor with up to 90 days in jail.
Can I be charged with voyeurism for installing cameras in my own home?
In most cases, yes. Property ownership does not override another person's reasonable expectation of privacy, and hidden cameras placed to secretly observe someone in a bathroom, guest bedroom, or changing area are the core conduct the voyeurism statute targets. One caveat: the statute entirely exempts security monitoring operated by or at the direction of an occupant of a residence from the section (Ark. Code 5-16-101(d)(2)), and Arkansas courts have not clarified how far that exemption reaches -- but it is not a safe assumption that owning the home or labeling a camera as security monitoring protects you if it is placed in a bathroom or similar private space.
What should I do if I find a hidden camera in Arkansas?
Contact local law enforcement immediately and file a police report. Do not remove or disturb the camera, as it is evidence. Document when and where you discovered it, photograph it if possible, and consult with an attorney about your rights and potential civil remedies.
Does voyeurism require registration as a sex offender in Arkansas?
It depends on the circumstances. A conviction for video voyeurism may require sex offender registration under the Arkansas Sex Offender Registration Act (Ark. Code 12-12-903 et seq.), particularly if the offense involved a minor or if the court determines registration is appropriate based on the facts of the case.
Can a landlord legally install hidden cameras in a rental property in Arkansas?
No. A landlord who installs hidden cameras inside a tenant's rental unit violates Ark. Code 5-16-101. Tenants have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their rented living spaces. Landlords may install visible security cameras in common areas of the building, but not inside individual units.
Updates
Corrected the codification of Arkansas's 2025 deepfake law: the offense is at Ark. Code section 5-14-139, not section 5-41-211 as previously stated in the citations, body text, and changelog. Also repaired dead government citation links.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
Added a caveat to the Nanny Cameras section and the 'can I be charged for cameras in my own home' FAQ noting Ark. Code 5-16-101(d)(2)'s exemption for residence-operated 'security monitoring,' whose outer limits Arkansas courts have not clarified. Also corrected the Class C felony fine bullet: Ark. Code 5-4-201 caps fines at $10,000 for both Class C and Class D felonies -- only imprisonment and classification escalate for a third offense, not the fine.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Spoke propagation: Swapped Justia AR statute links to arkleg.state.ar.us. Added Ark. Code Ann. § 5-14-139 (HB 1529 / Act 827 of 2025, signed April 17, 2025) -- first comprehensive AR deepfake statute (Class A misd first offense, Class D felony subsequent, private civil right of action). Confirmed NCII statute is § 5-26-314 (NOT § 5-26-313 which is domestic battering in the third degree). Noted § 5-26-314 does not on its face reach AI deepfake content. Added TAKE IT DOWN Act (Pub. L. No. 119-12, May 19, 2025) federal overlay for NCII including AI deepfakes with 48-hour platform takedown duty effective May 19, 2026.
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Arkansas Code of 1987 Annotated
§ 5-16-101Crime of video voyeurism.In forcecited in 9 of our articles
(a) It is unlawful for a person to use a camera, videotape, photo- optical, photoelectric, or other image recording device for the purpose of secretly observing, viewing, photographing, filming, or videotaping another person who is present in a residence, place of business, school, or other structu
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at arkleg.state.ar.us
Cited in 5 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2023
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Courts have applied the video voyeurism statute in Devries (2019), where children had a reasonable expectation of privacy behind closed bedroom and bathroom doors in a parent's home, and in Powell (2020), holding the crime is complete on using a camera for the prohibited purpose even if the images are never viewed.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Opinion No. (Arkansas Attorney General Reports 2001)“…tice of the surveillance would also negate any violation of A.C.A. § 5-16-101 , which criminalizes "video voyeurism."…”
- Bruce Wayne Devries v. State of Arkansas (Court of Appeals of Arkansas 2019, 2019 Ark. App. 478)✓One adopted daughter testified she caught Devries watching her through the bathroom window and found a baby monitor in her bathroom and bedroom; another caught him filming under her door. The court affirmed the video voyeurism convictions, rejecting his no-privacy-at-home claim.
- Robert Powell v. State of Arkansas (Court of Appeals of Arkansas 2020, 605 S.W.3d 532)✓Powell hid a camera in a fake outlet in a cabin he rented to a family and argued he could not be guilty because police took the SD card before he viewed the footage; the court held the statute punishes using a camera for that secret purpose, so never watching is no defense.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Arkansas Landlord-Tenant Recording Laws: Cameras, Audio, and Privacy Rights (2026), Arkansas Workplace Recording Laws: Employee and Employer Rights (2026), Arkansas Video Recording Laws: Public Filming, Private Property, and Consent (2026)
§ 5-14-139Unlawful creation or distribution of deepfake visual material.In forcecited in 3 of our articles
(a) As used in this section: (1) "Deepfake visual material" means a photograph, image, video, or other visual depiction that: (A) Appears to an ordinary person to be an authentic depiction of an identifiable person; and (B) Is generated, modified, or adapted using technology to falsely depict
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at arkleg.state.ar.us
Also relied on in: Arkansas Deepfake Laws: AI Images, Voice Cloning & Penalties (2026)
§ 5-4-201Fines — Limitations on amount.In forcecited in 3 of our articles
(a) A defendant convicted of a felony may be sentenced to pay a fine: (1) Not exceeding fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000) if the conviction is of a Class A felony or Class B felony; (2) Not exceeding ten thousand dollars ($10,000) if the conviction is of a Class C felony or Class D felony;…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2020-11-06 · Read the full text in our law library
Cited in 42 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Jim Ray, Inc. v. Williams (Court of Appeals of Arkansas 2007, 99 Ark. App. 315)“…Trade Practices Act. Ark.Code Ann. § 4-88-103 (Repl. 2001); Ark.Code Ann. § 5-4-201(b)(1) (Repl.2006). The Act also provide…”
- Wooten v. State (Court of Appeals of Arkansas 2005, 93 Ark. App. 178)“…a $1000 fine and a jail term not to exceed one year. See Ark. Code Ann. §§ 5-4-201 (b)(1) and 5-4-401(b)(1) (Repl. 1997).…”
- Morris v. State (Supreme Court of Arkansas 2017, 518 S.W.3d 70)“…fine for a Class C misdemeanor is not to exceed $500. See Ark. Code Ann. § 5-4-201(b)(3) (Repl. 2013). The Arkans…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Arkansas Audio Recording Laws: One-Party Consent Rules and Penalties (2026), Arkansas Surveillance Camera Laws (2026 Guide)
§ 5-4-401Sentence.In forcecited in 6 of our articles
(a) A defendant convicted of a felony shall receive a determinate sentence according to the following limitations: (1) For a Class Y felony, the sentence shall be not less than ten (10) years and not more than forty (40) years, or life; (2) For a Class A felony, the sentence shall be not less…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2020-11-06 · Read the full text in our law library
Cited in 248 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Radford v. State (Court of Appeals of Arkansas 2018, 538 S.W.3d 894)“…r a Class B felony is five to twenty years' imprisonment. Ark. Code Ann. § 5-4-401 (a)(3). The final sentencing order tha…”
- Romario Waller v. State of Arkansas (Supreme Court of Arkansas 2020, 2020 Ark. 381)“…onment for first-degree murder is not illegal on its face. Ark. Code Ann. § 5-4-401(a)(1) (Repl. 1993). Moreover, this cour…”
- James Sherwood Edwards v. State of Arkansas (Court of Appeals of Arkansas 2024, 2024 Ark. App. 431)“…nge for Class D felony at not more than fifteen years) with Ark. Code Ann. § 5-4-401(a)(2) (Repl. 2013) (setting sentencing…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Arkansas Security Camera Laws: Home, Business, and HOA Rules (2026), Arkansas AI Meeting Recording Laws (2026), Arkansas Ring Doorbell Laws: What You Need to Know in 2026
United States Code Title 18
§ 1801Video voyeurismIn forcecited in 79 of our articles
Whoever, in the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, has the intent to capture an image of a private area of an individual without their consent, and knowingly does so under circumstances in which the individual has a reasonable expectation of privacy, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. In this section— the term “capture”, with respect to an image, means to videotape, photograph, film, record by any means, or broadcast; the term “broadcast” means to electronically transmit a visual image with the intent that it be viewed by a person or persons; the term “a private area of the individual” means the naked or undergarment clad genitals, pubic area, buttocks, or female breast of that individual; the term “female breast” means any portion of the female breast below the top of the areola; and the term “under circumstances in which that individual has a reasonable expectation of privacy” means— circumstances in which a reasonable person would believe that he or she could disrobe in privacy, without being concerned that an image of a private area of the individual was being captured; or circumstances in which a…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 53 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Courts have applied 18 U.S.C. 1801 mainly at its edges. United States v. Johnson (2010) read it as Congress's answer to secretly filming nudity on federal property, acquitting on a child exploitation charge instead. EPIC v. Department of Homeland Security (2011) applied the Section 1801(c) law enforcement exception to a TSA scanner claim.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- United States v. Anthony Helton (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit 2019, 944 F.3d 198)“…from this list of federal offenses is video voyeurism under 18 U.S.C. § 1801. Rather than list this statute as an enu…”
- United States v. Johnson (District Court, W.D. Missouri 2010, 719 F. Supp. 2d 1059)✓A weightlifting coach hid a camera to film minors weighing in nude; acquitting him under the child exploitation statute, the court called that conduct plain video voyeurism under section 1801, but noted the section reaches only federal maritime and territorial jurisdiction.
- Electronic Privacy Information Center v. United States Department of Homeland Security (Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit 2011, 653 F.3d 1)✓Privacy groups challenged TSA body scanners under the Video Voyeurism Prevention Act; the D.C. Circuit held the statute's exception for lawful law enforcement, correctional, or intelligence activity applied to airport screening, so the section 1801 claim failed.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Alaska Voyeurism and Hidden Camera Laws: AS 11.61.123 Explained (2026), Arizona Surreptitious Recording & Voyeurism Laws: ARS 13-3019 Penalties (2026), Colorado Voyeurism and Hidden Camera Laws: Offenses, Penalties, and Protections
§ 2520Recovery of civil damages authorizedIn forcecited in 115 of our articles
Except as provided in section 2511(2)(a)(ii), any person whose wire, oral, or electronic communication is intercepted, disclosed, or intentionally used in violation of this chapter may in a civil action recover from the person or entity, other than the United States, which engaged in that violation such relief as may be appropriate. In an action under this section, appropriate relief includes— such preliminary and other equitable or declaratory relief as may be appropriate; damages under subsection (c) and punitive damages in appropriate cases; and a reasonable attorney’s fee and other litigation costs reasonably incurred.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 860 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Walker v. Darby (1990) held a 2520 plaintiff need not prove the contents of intercepted conversations, only interception and a justified expectation against it. Bartnicki v. Vopper (2001) barred 2520 damages against defendants who took no part in the interception, obtained the tape lawfully, and disclosed a matter of public concern.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Jessie Walker v. Thomas E. Darby, Hugh L. Robinson, Jr., and Kenneth Day (Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit 1990, 911 F.2d 1573)✓A postal letter carrier said three supervisors wired an intercom near his workstation to listen in. Reversing summary judgment, the Eleventh Circuit held a section 2520 plaintiff can show interception without proving the contents of specific conversations.
- Gelbard v. United States (Supreme Court of the United States 1972, 408 U.S. 41)“…disclosure, or use is entitled to recover civil damages, 18 U. S. C. § 2520 . Title III also bars the use as eviden…”
- DirecTV, Inc. v. Hoa Huynh (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2007, 503 F.3d 847)“…7 U.S.C. § 605 (e)(4), or alternatively, for violations of 18 U.S.C. § 2520 (a), or alternatively, for violations o…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: US Recording Laws by State (2026): All 50 States Explained, One-Party Consent States: Complete 2026 Guide, Alabama Audio Recording Laws: Consent Rules and Penalties
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Ark. Code 5-16-101 - Crime of Video Voyeurism(law.justia.com)
- Ark. Code 5-4-401 - Sentencing for Misdemeanors and Felonies(law.justia.com)
- Ark. Code 5-4-201 - Fines and Limitations on Amount(law.justia.com)
- Arkansas Sex Offender Registry - Department of Public Safety(dps.arkansas.gov).gov
- 18 U.S.C. 1801 - Video Voyeurism Prevention Act(law.cornell.edu)
- 18 U.S.C. 2520 - Civil Remedies for Wiretap Violations(law.cornell.edu)
- Arkansas Department of Public Safety(dps.arkansas.gov).gov
- Arkansas General Assembly - Legislative Session(arkleg.state.ar.us).gov
- Ark. Code Ann. 5-14-139 - Deepfake Visual Material (HB 1529 / Act 827 of 2025)(arkleg.state.ar.us).gov
- TAKE IT DOWN Act, Pub. L. No. 119-12 (signed May 19, 2025)(congress.gov).gov