Arkansas
Arkansas Workplace Recording Laws: Employee and Employer Rights (2026)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 15, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 7, 2026. · 6 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Arkansas employees can legally record any workplace conversation they participate in without notifying coworkers or supervisors. Ark. Code Ann. 5-60-120 requires only one-party consent, so your participation satisfies the law. Company policy, however, can restrict recording, and Arkansas at-will employment allows termination for policy violations.
Workplace recording in Arkansas sits at the intersection of state wiretapping law, employer rights, employee privacy, and federal labor protections. Because Arkansas is a one-party consent state under Ark. Code 5-60-120, the legal framework for recording in the workplace differs significantly from states that require all parties to consent.
This guide covers what employees can record, what employers can monitor, the role of company policies, and how federal law interacts with Arkansas state law in the workplace context.
Can Employees Record at Work in Arkansas?
Audio Recording by Employees
Yes. Under Ark. Code 5-60-120, any employee who is a participant in a workplace conversation can legally record it without informing the other parties. This includes:
- Conversations with supervisors and managers
- Performance reviews and disciplinary meetings
- Discussions with HR representatives
- Conversations with coworkers
- Phone calls made or received at work
- Video conference meetings you attend
The law requires only that one party to the conversation consent to the recording. As the person choosing to record, you satisfy that requirement.
Common Reasons Employees Record at Work
Employees in Arkansas record workplace interactions for a variety of legitimate purposes:
- Documenting harassment or discrimination. Recordings can provide direct evidence of hostile work environment claims, sexual harassment, racial discrimination, or other prohibited conduct.
- Preserving verbal instructions. When a supervisor gives complex verbal instructions, a recording ensures accuracy.
- Protecting against retaliation. If you report safety concerns or legal violations, recordings can document retaliatory responses.
- Recording disciplinary meetings. Having a record of what was actually said during a write-up or termination meeting can be valuable if you later dispute the action.
- Documenting wage and hour issues. Recording conversations about pay, hours, or overtime can support claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).
Video Recording by Employees
Video recording at work is more nuanced than audio. While Arkansas has no general law prohibiting video in workplaces, certain locations are off-limits. Employees cannot record video in areas where coworkers have a reasonable expectation of privacy, including:
- Restrooms and bathrooms
- Changing rooms and locker rooms
- Private nursing rooms
In common areas such as meeting rooms, break rooms, open office spaces, and hallways, video recording is generally permissible.
Can Employers Record Employees in Arkansas?

Employer Audio Recording
Employers can record workplace conversations under the same one-party consent framework. If a manager participates in a conversation with an employee, the manager can record it. An employer can also record phone calls handled by its employees if the employer or its authorized agent is a party to the call or has the consent of one party.
However, employers cannot secretly record conversations they are not part of. Planting hidden microphones in a break room to capture employee-to-employee conversations without any party's consent violates Ark. Code 5-60-120.
Employer Video Surveillance
Employers in Arkansas can install video surveillance cameras in common work areas for security and operational purposes. Cameras are commonly placed in:
- Retail floor areas
- Warehouses and shipping areas
- Parking lots and building exteriors
- Lobbies, hallways, and reception areas
- Cash registers and point-of-sale stations
Where Employers Cannot Place Cameras
Video surveillance is strictly prohibited in areas where employees have a reasonable expectation of privacy. Under Ark. Code 5-16-101, placing cameras in the following locations can result in felony charges:
- Bathrooms and restrooms
- Locker rooms and changing areas
- Private nursing or lactation rooms
- Shower facilities
An employer who places a camera in any of these locations faces Class D felony charges (up to 6 years in prison for a first or second offense). One caveat: Ark. Code 5-16-101(d)(3) exempts "security monitoring operated by or at the direction of the owner or administrator of a place of business, school, or other structure" from the entire section, and the statute does not expressly limit that exemption to non-private areas -- Arkansas courts have not clarified how far it reaches, so employers should not rely on a stated security purpose and should still treat these areas as off-limits.
Computer and Electronic Monitoring
Arkansas employers can monitor company-owned computers, email systems, and phone lines. The Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA) provides a "business extension exception" that allows employers to monitor communications on equipment they provide for business purposes. Employers who clearly communicate that company systems are monitored have broad latitude in this area.
The Role of Company Recording Policies

At-Will Employment and Policy Enforcement
Arkansas is an at-will employment state. This means employers can terminate employees for any reason that is not specifically prohibited by law, including violation of a company recording policy. Even though recording a conversation is legal under Arkansas state law, an employer can still discipline or fire an employee who violates an internal policy against recording.
This creates a distinction between what is legal and what is permitted by your employer. Understanding this distinction is critical for employees considering whether to record at work.
Common Employer Policies on Recording
Many Arkansas employers include recording provisions in their employee handbooks. Common policy approaches include:
- Total ban: No recording of any kind on company premises without management approval.
- Restricted recording: Recording allowed in certain areas or for certain purposes but prohibited in others.
- Consent-based policy: Recording permitted only when all parties to the conversation are notified and agree.
- No policy: Some employers do not address recording at all, in which case state law governs.
Should You Review Your Employer's Policy?
Before recording at work, check your employee handbook or ask HR whether the company has a recording policy. Understanding the policy allows you to weigh the legal protection of one-party consent against the practical risk of disciplinary action.
NLRA Protections for Employee Recording

Section 7 Rights
The National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) Section 7 protects employees' right to engage in "concerted activity" for mutual aid or protection. The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has addressed employer recording bans in several significant decisions.
Key current precedent: Stericycle, Inc., 372 NLRB No. 113 (Aug. 2, 2023) is the governing Board standard for evaluating work rules. NLRB General Counsel Memorandum 25-05 (Feb. 14, 2025) is a housekeeping rescission of prior General Counsel memoranda -- it is NOT a reinstatement of the more permissive Boeing framework. Stericycle remains binding Board precedent.
When Recording Policies Violate the NLRA
Under Stericycle (2023), an employer's work rule violates the NLRA if it has a reasonable tendency to chill protected activity, unless the employer can show a legitimate business justification that outweighs the burden on Section 7 rights. A blanket ban on all workplace recording is therefore more likely to be found unlawful under Stericycle than it was under the prior Boeing test. Protected concerted activity includes:
- Documenting unsafe working conditions to share with coworkers or regulators
- Recording evidence of wage theft or labor law violations
- Gathering evidence of unfair labor practices
- Recording union organizing discussions
Limits on NLRA Protection
NLRA protections do not cover all employee recording. The Act protects recording that is part of concerted activity, meaning action taken by or on behalf of a group of employees. A purely personal grievance that does not relate to the terms and conditions of employment for other workers may fall outside Section 7 protection.
Additionally, NLRA protections do not apply to supervisors, managers, agricultural workers, domestic workers, independent contractors, or government employees. These individuals must rely on state law protections alone.
Wearable Recording Devices in the Workplace
AI Voice Recorders
Devices like Plaud and similar AI-powered voice recorders have become popular tools for capturing workplace conversations. In Arkansas, using a clip-on voice recorder to capture meetings and discussions you participate in is legal under one-party consent. The small, discreet nature of these devices means other parties may not realize they are being recorded.
Smart Glasses
Smart glasses like Meta Ray-Bans present additional considerations because they capture video as well as audio. In public areas and common workspaces where there is no reasonable expectation of privacy, recording video through smart glasses is generally legal. However, wearing smart glasses into bathrooms, locker rooms, or other private areas could violate Ark. Code 5-16-101 even if no recording is occurring, because the presence of a camera-equipped device in a private space may raise concerns.
Employer Policies on Wearable Devices
Employers drafting policies on wearable recording devices must balance their business interests against NLRA protections. A policy that bans all wearable devices without exception may be found overly broad if it chills protected concerted activity. The better approach for employers is to craft narrow policies that address specific legitimate business concerns, such as protecting trade secrets or client confidentiality, without creating a blanket prohibition on recording.
Specific Workplace Recording Scenarios
Recording a Meeting with Your Boss
You can legally record any meeting with your supervisor, including performance reviews, disciplinary discussions, and casual conversations. This is one of the most common uses of one-party consent in the workplace. The recording can later serve as evidence if you need to dispute what was said.
Recording Harassment
Employees experiencing harassment at work can record the harassing conduct as it happens. This type of recording is particularly valuable because harassment cases often come down to credibility. A recording eliminates the "he said, she said" problem and provides direct evidence of the harassing behavior.
If the harassment relates to a protected characteristic under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act (race, color, religion, sex, or national origin), the recording may also support a complaint to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC).
Recording a Termination Meeting
You can record your own termination meeting in Arkansas. Many employment attorneys recommend doing so because the employer's statements during termination can be relevant to claims of wrongful termination, discrimination, or retaliation. Keep in mind that once you are terminated, your employer may ask you to return any company property, but a recording on your personal device is your property.
Recording Safety Violations
If you observe workplace safety violations that endanger you or your coworkers, recording the conditions can provide evidence for complaints to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). OSHA whistleblower protections may shield you from retaliation for reporting safety concerns, even if your employer has a no-recording policy.
Recording Wage Discussions
Under the NLRA, discussing wages with coworkers is protected concerted activity. If your employer attempts to prohibit discussions about pay or retaliates against you for sharing wage information, recordings of these interactions can serve as evidence of NLRA violations.
Using Workplace Recordings as Evidence
In Employment Lawsuits
Recordings made legally under one-party consent are generally admissible in Arkansas courts. In employment lawsuits, recordings can support claims of:
- Wrongful termination
- Workplace harassment and hostile work environment
- Discrimination based on protected characteristics
- Retaliation for protected activity
- Breach of employment contract
- Wage and hour violations
In EEOC and Administrative Proceedings
The EEOC and Arkansas state agencies accept lawfully obtained recordings as evidence in discrimination and harassment complaints. A recording that captures discriminatory remarks, retaliatory threats, or admissions of unlawful conduct can significantly strengthen an administrative claim.
In Workers' Compensation Claims
If you are injured at work and your employer disputes the circumstances of the injury, recordings of conversations about workplace conditions, safety protocols, or the incident itself may be relevant to your workers' compensation claim.
Federal Law Note on Intimate Image Distribution
The TAKE IT DOWN Act (Pub. L. No. 119-12, signed May 19, 2025) criminalizes the knowing publication of non-consensual intimate images (NCII) including AI deepfakes and requires covered platforms to remove such content within 48 hours of notice (effective May 19, 2026). Employers should be aware that distributing intimate images of employees could create liability under this federal law in addition to state tort claims.
Employer Best Practices
Developing a Clear Recording Policy
Employers in Arkansas should develop a written recording policy that:
- Clearly states whether workplace recording is permitted, restricted, or prohibited
- Defines the scope (audio, video, or both)
- Identifies specific areas where recording is never permitted (privacy areas)
- Explains the consequences for policy violations
- Avoids language so broad that it could violate the NLRA
- Is communicated to all employees during onboarding and policy updates
Training Managers
Managers should be trained on the company's recording policy and on the assumption that any conversation could be recorded. In a one-party consent state, the safest approach for management is to communicate as though every interaction is on the record.
Documenting Employee Interactions
Rather than relying on surveillance, employers should document important employee interactions through written records, email confirmations, and witnessed meetings. This creates a parallel record that does not depend on recording technology.
Explore More Arkansas Recording Law Topics
Audio Recording | Video Recording | Voyeurism Laws | Workplace Recording | Recording Police | Phone Call Recording | Security Cameras | Recording in Public | Landlord-Tenant | Dashcam Laws | School Recording | Medical Recording
Back to Arkansas Recording Laws
More Arkansas Recording Topics
More Arkansas Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I record my boss in Arkansas without telling them?
Yes. Arkansas is a one-party consent state under Ark. Code 5-60-120. You can legally record any conversation you participate in at work, including meetings with your boss, without notifying them. However, your employer may have a policy against recording, and violating it could result in disciplinary action.
Can my employer fire me for recording at work in Arkansas?
Yes, in most cases. Arkansas is an at-will employment state, so your employer can terminate you for violating a company no-recording policy even though the recording is legal under state law. However, if your recording was protected concerted activity under the NLRA, your termination might be an unfair labor practice.
Can my employer put cameras in the break room in Arkansas?
Yes. Employers can install video surveillance in common areas like break rooms, hallways, and workspaces. They cannot install cameras in bathrooms, locker rooms, or changing areas. Doing so violates Ark. Code 5-16-101 and can result in felony charges.
Can I use a wearable voice recorder at work in Arkansas?
Legally, yes. One-party consent under Ark. Code 5-60-120 allows you to record conversations you participate in using any device, including wearable voice recorders. However, your employer may have a policy restricting recording devices. Check your employee handbook before using a wearable recorder at work.
Is a recording of workplace harassment admissible in court in Arkansas?
Yes. Recordings made legally under one-party consent are generally admissible as evidence in Arkansas courts. A recording that captures harassment can support claims filed with the EEOC, in state court, or in federal court. The recording must be authenticated and relevant to the claim.
Updates
Fixed two broken Arkansas statute citation links (Ark. Code 5-60-120 and 5-16-101) that were returning server errors; they now point to live, verified statute text.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
Corrected the employer camera-liability claim: Ark. Code 5-16-101(d)(3) exempts business-operated 'security monitoring' from the section entirely, which contradicts the article's 'regardless of the stated purpose' framing. Added a caveat that this exemption's scope for private areas like bathrooms is unresolved by Arkansas courts, so employers still should not place cameras there.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Spoke propagation: Swapped Justia AR statute links to arkleg.state.ar.us. Corrected NLRB framing: NLRB GC 25-05 (Feb. 14, 2025) is a housekeeping rescission of prior GC memoranda, NOT a Boeing-era reinstatement. Stericycle, Inc., 372 NLRB No. 113 (Aug. 2, 2023) remains controlling Board precedent for evaluating work rules. Added TAKE IT DOWN Act (Pub. L. No. 119-12, May 19, 2025) note re: employer liability for distributing employee intimate images including AI deepfakes.
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Arkansas Code of 1987 Annotated
§ 5-60-120Interception and recording.In forcecited in 17 of our articles
(a) It is unlawful for a person to intercept a wire, landline, oral, telephonic communication, or wireless communication, and to record or possess a recording of the communication unless the person is a party to the communication or one (1) of the parties to the communication has given prior…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at arkleg.state.ar.us
Cited in 10 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2022
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Lewis v. State (1999) applied Section 5-60-120(a) to a man who taped his ex-wife's calls without being a party or having consent, affirming revocation. Elliott v. State (1998) held that while such recording by a private citizen is unlawful, the statute does not bar the tape from evidence.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Lewis v. State (Supreme Court of Arkansas 1999, 336 Ark. 469)✓A man on probation admitted attaching a recorder to the telephone box outside his ex-wife's house and taping her calls; the court found that violated Section 5-60-120(a) because he was not a party and no party consented, and affirmed the revocation.
- Opinion No. (Arkansas Attorney General Reports 1998)“…consented to the recording. This provision is set forth in A.C.A. § 5-60-120 , as follows: 5-60-120 . Interceptio…”
- King v. State (Supreme Court of Arkansas 2019, 571 S.W.3d 476)✓A friend's phone app secretly recorded a murder suspect's call with a detective; the court held that although Section 5-60-120 makes such a recording by a non-party unlawful, it does not bar admissibility, and affirmed the refusal to exclude the tape.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Arkansas Recording Laws (2026): One-Party Consent Rules, Arkansas Audio Recording Laws: One-Party Consent Rules and Penalties (2026), Arkansas Dashcam Laws: Mounting, Audio, and Legal Uses (2026)
§ 5-16-101Crime of video voyeurism.In forcecited in 9 of our articles
(a) It is unlawful for a person to use a camera, videotape, photo- optical, photoelectric, or other image recording device for the purpose of secretly observing, viewing, photographing, filming, or videotaping another person who is present in a residence, place of business, school, or other structu
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at arkleg.state.ar.us
Cited in 5 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2023
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Courts have applied the video voyeurism statute in Devries (2019), where children had a reasonable expectation of privacy behind closed bedroom and bathroom doors in a parent's home, and in Powell (2020), holding the crime is complete on using a camera for the prohibited purpose even if the images are never viewed.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Opinion No. (Arkansas Attorney General Reports 2001)“…tice of the surveillance would also negate any violation of A.C.A. § 5-16-101 , which criminalizes "video voyeurism."…”
- Bruce Wayne Devries v. State of Arkansas (Court of Appeals of Arkansas 2019, 2019 Ark. App. 478)✓One adopted daughter testified she caught Devries watching her through the bathroom window and found a baby monitor in her bathroom and bedroom; another caught him filming under her door. The court affirmed the video voyeurism convictions, rejecting his no-privacy-at-home claim.
- Robert Powell v. State of Arkansas (Court of Appeals of Arkansas 2020, 605 S.W.3d 532)✓Powell hid a camera in a fake outlet in a cabin he rented to a family and argued he could not be guilty because police took the SD card before he viewed the footage; the court held the statute punishes using a camera for that secret purpose, so never watching is no defense.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Arkansas Landlord-Tenant Recording Laws: Cameras, Audio, and Privacy Rights (2026), Arkansas Video Recording Laws: Public Filming, Private Property, and Consent (2026), Arkansas Voyeurism Laws: Hidden Cameras, Penalties, and Defenses (2026)
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Ark. Code 5-60-120 - Interception and Recording(law.justia.com)
- Ark. Code 5-16-101 - Crime of Video Voyeurism(law.justia.com)
- National Labor Relations Board - Employee Rights(nlrb.gov).gov
- OSHA - Occupational Safety and Health Administration(osha.gov).gov
- EEOC - Equal Employment Opportunity Commission(eeoc.gov).gov
- U.S. Department of Labor - Fair Labor Standards Act(dol.gov).gov
- 18 U.S.C. Chapter 119 - Electronic Communications Privacy Act(law.cornell.edu)
- Stericycle Inc., 372 NLRB No. 113 (Aug. 2, 2023) - Governing standard for work rules(nlrb.gov).gov
- NLRB GC Memorandum 25-05 (Feb. 14, 2025) - Housekeeping rescission of prior GC memos(nlrb.gov).gov