EnglishEspañol

Minnesota Laws on Recording in Public: Rights, Limits, and Privacy Rules

Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 15, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 15, 2026. · 6 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Minnesota Laws on Recording in Public: Rights, Limits, and Privacy Rules

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I film people in public in Minnesota without their consent?

Yes. People in public spaces generally have no reasonable expectation of privacy. You can record video and take photographs of people on public streets, sidewalks, parks, and other public areas without their consent. The First Amendment protects this right.

Can I record a government meeting in Minnesota?

Yes. Minnesota's Open Meeting Law (Chapter 13D) requires most government meetings to be open to the public, including the right to record them. Public bodies cannot prohibit recording of open meetings, though they may set reasonable rules about equipment placement.

Can a store owner tell me to stop recording in Minnesota?

Yes. While recording in a public-access business is not illegal, the property owner can ask you to stop recording and ask you to leave if you refuse. Staying after being asked to leave can result in trespassing charges under Minn. Stat. Section 609.605. However, the owner cannot demand you delete recordings already made.

Can I livestream in public in Minnesota?

Yes. Livestreaming in public spaces is protected by the First Amendment. You can livestream on public streets, at public events, during protests, and at government meetings. The same rules that apply to recording also apply to livestreaming.

Is it legal to record in a public restroom in Minnesota?

No. Despite being in a public building, restrooms are areas where people have a reasonable expectation of privacy. Recording in a public restroom violates Minn. Stat. Section 609.746 and is a gross misdemeanor for a first offense, carrying up to 1 year in jail and a $3,000 fine.

Updates

Corrected the Eighth Circuit qualified-immunity citation (now Molina v. Book, 59 F.4th 334 (8th Cir. 2023), replacing an unrelated case), corrected the UpdatesLog entry to match, and fixed a dead Minnesota Rules of Evidence Rule 901 citation link.

Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes

Governing law re-checked for recent changes

Added Eighth Circuit qualified-immunity caveat: right to record police not yet clearly established per Molina v. Book, 59 F.4th 334 (8th Cir. 2023). (2026-08-15 correction: the prior version of this note cited Ness v. City of Bloomington, which does not address recording police, and miscited Robbins v. Becker and Chestnut v. Wallace.)

Reviewed and approved by an editor

Sources and References

  1. Minn. Stat. Section 626A.02(revisor.mn.gov).gov
  2. Minn. Stat. Section 609.746 - Interference with Privacy(revisor.mn.gov).gov
  3. Minn. Stat. Chapter 13D - Open Meeting Law(revisor.mn.gov).gov
  4. Minn. Stat. Section 609.605 - Trespass(revisor.mn.gov).gov
  5. Minnesota Rules of Evidence Rule 901(revisor.mn.gov).gov
  6. FAA Drone Rules(faa.gov).gov
  7. 18 U.S.C. Section 2511 - Federal Wiretap Act(law.cornell.edu)
Share: