EnglishEspañol
Mississippi flag

Mississippi

Mississippi Voyeurism and Hidden Camera Laws: Penalties and Protections (2026)

Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 15, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 15, 2026. · 3 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Mississippi Voyeurism and Hidden Camera Laws: Penalties and Protections (2026)

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the penalty for hidden camera voyeurism in Mississippi?

Hidden camera recording made with lewd, licentious, or indecent intent in a private place is a felony under Miss. Code Ann. section 97-29-63. For adult victims, the penalty is a fine of up to $5,000, up to 5 years in prison, or both. If the victim is under 16 years old, the maximum prison term rises to 10 years, but the maximum fine stays at $5,000.

Is upskirting illegal in Mississippi?

Yes. Section 97-29-63 specifically prohibits filming under or through a person's clothing without their consent. This applies regardless of whether the person is in a public or private location.

Can I sue someone for recording me with a hidden camera in Mississippi?

Yes. Victims of voyeurism can file civil lawsuits for invasion of privacy, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and other causes of action. You can seek compensatory damages, punitive damages, attorney fees, and injunctive relief. A civil lawsuit is separate from any criminal prosecution.

What should I do if I find a hidden camera in my rental or hotel room?

Document the camera's location with your own photos without disturbing it. Contact local law enforcement immediately. Notify the property management or hotel management. Preserve all evidence. Consider consulting an attorney about civil remedies for invasion of privacy.

Does a voyeurism conviction require sex offender registration in Mississippi?

Generally, yes. Under Miss. Code Ann. section 45-33-47, a conviction under section 97-29-63 is classified as a Tier Two registrable offense (minimum 25-year registration) without an age qualifier for the victim, while the separate voyeurism provision at section 97-29-61(2) is Tier One (minimum 15-year registration) and applies only when the victim is under 16. Consult with a criminal defense attorney for case-specific guidance.

Updates

Corrected the voyeurism penalty description throughout the page: Mississippi's hidden-camera statute imposes a fine, imprisonment, or both, not both together, and the $5,000 maximum fine is the same whether the victim is an adult or under 16 (only the maximum prison term rises to 10 years for a minor victim). Also corrected the federal video-voyeurism penalty to reflect its fine-or-prison-or-both structure, and a mischaracterized wiretapping citation (the substantive prohibition is section 41-29-507; section 41-29-533 is the penalty clause). Separately, repointed every Mississippi Code citation on this page from the Legislature's bare homepage to the specific Justia section it names.

Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes

Restored 97-29-63's specific-intent element throughout the page (this page's central subject, so the omission ran through the elements section, intro, KeyTakeaways, and FAQ) and corrected the sex-offender-registration section: 97-29-63 is a Tier I registrable offense with no victim-age qualifier, unlike the age-limited 97-29-61(2).

Corrected the sex-offender-registration tier labels: a 97-29-63 conviction is Tier Two (25-year minimum registration), not Tier I; 97-29-61(2) (child-victim voyeurism) is the Tier One offense (15-year minimum), verified against Miss. Code Ann. 45-33-47. Also corrected the description of 41-29-505 (narcotics wiretap court-order procedure, not a general audio-interception ban; the general prohibition is 41-29-533).

Governing law re-checked for recent changes

Governing law re-checked for recent changes

Spoke propagation from parent hub: replaced all Justia URLs with legislature.ms.gov canonical source; replaced FindLaw Turner v. Driver citation with ca5.uscourts.gov (No. 15-11311) on police, public-recording, and video spokes; corrected is_gov flags for legislature.ms.gov entries in SourcesList components; added keywords and citations arrays to [dashcam](/dashboard-camera-legality-and-privacy-laws-is-it-illegal-to-use-dashcams-in-north-america), landlord-tenant, and schools spokes; updated workplace spoke NLRB section to cite Stericycle, Inc., 372 NLRB No. 113 (2023) as the controlling work-rule standard replacing Boeing. No fabricated cases (Lewis v. State, Glazner v. Glazner) or SB 2437 references found. No 47 CFR 64.501 or FCC 23-107 references found.

Reviewed and approved by an editor

Sources and References

  1. Miss. Code Ann. section 97-29-63 - Voyeurism Statute(law.justia.com)
  2. Miss. Code Ann. section 45-33-23 - Sex Offender Registry(law.justia.com)
  3. 18 U.S.C. section 1801 - Video Voyeurism Prevention Act(law.cornell.edu)
  4. Mississippi Department of Employment Security(mdes.ms.gov).gov
  5. Mississippi Rules of Evidence(courts.ms.gov).gov
  6. DOJ Citizens Guide to Federal Voyeurism Law(justice.gov).gov
Share: