EnglishEspañol
Mississippi flag

Mississippi

Mississippi Laws on Recording Police: Your Rights and Limits (2026)

Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 15, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 9, 2026. · 3 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Mississippi Laws on Recording Police: Your Rights and Limits (2026)

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I legally record police officers in Mississippi?

Yes. The First Amendment protects your right to record police officers performing their duties in public. The Fifth Circuit confirmed this right in Turner v. Driver (2017), which is binding law in Mississippi. You must not physically interfere with police operations.

Can a police officer order me to stop recording in Mississippi?

No, not in a public place. Officers can direct you to move to a safe distance for safety reasons, but they cannot order you to stop recording entirely. If an officer orders you to stop, calmly assert your First Amendment right while complying with any lawful orders about your physical location.

Can police delete my footage or seize my phone in Mississippi?

Police cannot order you to delete footage. Under Riley v. California (2014), officers generally need a warrant to search your phone. If your device is seized, the officer must obtain a warrant before accessing its contents. Comply with the seizure physically but contact an attorney immediately.

How do I get police body camera footage in Mississippi?

Submit a written public records request to the law enforcement agency under Mississippi's Public Records Act (section 25-61-1 et seq.). Include the date, time, location, and officers involved. The agency may charge a reasonable fee and has a reasonable period to respond.

Can I record police during a traffic stop in Mississippi?

Yes. You can use your phone, dashcam, or another device to record the traffic stop. Place your phone where the officer can see it to reduce tension. Comply with all lawful orders regarding your license and registration. Passengers can also record the interaction.

Updates

Fixed a dead case-law link and added the missing second half of the Turner v. Driver holding: the Fifth Circuit granted the officers qualified immunity for the plaintiff's own 2015 conduct because the right to record police was not yet clearly established, and made the right binding only going forward, subject to reasonable time, place, and manner limits. Separately, repointed every Mississippi Code citation on this page from the Legislature's bare homepage to the specific Justia section it names.

Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources

Governing law re-checked for recent changes

Governing law re-checked for recent changes

Spoke propagation from parent hub: replaced all Justia URLs with legislature.ms.gov canonical source; replaced FindLaw Turner v. Driver citation with ca5.uscourts.gov (No. 15-11311) on police, public-recording, and video spokes; corrected is_gov flags for legislature.ms.gov entries in SourcesList components; added keywords and citations arrays to [dashcam](/dashboard-camera-legality-and-privacy-laws-is-it-illegal-to-use-dashcams-in-north-america), landlord-tenant, and schools spokes; updated workplace spoke NLRB section to cite Stericycle, Inc., 372 NLRB No. 113 (2023) as the controlling work-rule standard replacing Boeing. No fabricated cases (Lewis v. State, Glazner v. Glazner) or SB 2437 references found. No 47 CFR 64.501 or FCC 23-107 references found.

Reviewed and approved by an editor

Sources and References

  1. Turner v. Driver, 848 F.3d 678 (5th Cir. 2017)(courtlistener.com)
  2. Miss. Code Ann. section 41-29-531(law.justia.com)
  3. 42 U.S.C. section 1983(law.cornell.edu)
  4. Riley v. California (2014)(supremecourt.gov).gov
  5. DOJ Civil Rights Division(civilrights.justice.gov).gov
  6. BJA Body-Worn Camera Programs(bja.ojp.gov).gov
Share: