Indiana
Indiana Phone Call Recording Laws: One-Party Consent Rules Explained
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 15, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 15, 2026. · 4 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Indiana follows one-party consent for phone calls under Ind. Code 35-33.5-5-5, so you can record any call you participate in without notifying the other party. Recording by a non-participant without consent is a Level 5 felony carrying one to six years in prison and fines up to $10,000.
Indiana law gives you broad rights to record your own phone calls. Under IC 35-33.5-5, Indiana follows one-party consent for recording wire and electronic communications. If you are a party to a phone call, you can record it without informing or getting permission from anyone else on the line.
This guide covers everything you need to know about recording phone calls in Indiana, including personal calls, business calls, VoIP and video conference audio, interstate call complications, and the penalties for illegal call recording.
Indiana's One-Party Consent Rule for Phone Calls
The Legal Basis
Two key Indiana statutes govern phone call recording. IC 35-33.5-5-5 prohibits the intentional interception of wire or electronic communications without consent. The statute then provides the critical one-party consent exception: recording is legal when done by a party to the communication or with the consent of at least one party.
The definition of "interception" under IC 35-31.5-2-176 further clarifies the law. Interception means the intentional recording or acquisition of the contents of an electronic communication by a person other than the sender or receiver, without consent from either party. If you are the sender or receiver, your own recording is not "interception" at all under this definition.
This means phone call recording is legal in Indiana when:
- You are on the call. Your own participation satisfies the consent requirement.
- Someone on the call authorized you to record. A participant can give you prior consent to record, even if you are not directly on the line.
What Types of Calls Are Covered
Indiana's one-party consent rule applies to all forms of telephone communication:
- Landline calls from home or office phones
- Cell phone calls on any carrier or device
- VoIP calls through platforms like Skype, WhatsApp, Signal, or Google Voice
- Video call audio from Zoom, Microsoft Teams, Google Meet, or FaceTime
- Conference calls with multiple participants, as long as you are one of them
What You Do NOT Need to Do
Under Indiana's one-party consent law, you are not required to:
- Announce that you are recording the call
- Play a beep tone or notification sound
- Get verbal or written consent from other parties
- Use any specific type of recording device or software
- Inform the other party after the call that it was recorded
Recording Personal Phone Calls

Calls With Family Members
You can record phone calls with family members, including your spouse, parents, siblings, or adult children, as long as you are participating in the conversation. These recordings can be useful for preserving important family discussions, documenting verbal agreements, or keeping a record of conversations during family disputes.
In divorce and custody proceedings, recorded phone calls are commonly submitted as evidence. Indiana courts will generally admit recordings made under the one-party consent rule, though judges evaluate each recording for relevance, authenticity, and whether the probative value outweighs any prejudicial effect.
Calls With Service Providers
Recording calls with customer service representatives, insurance companies, utility providers, medical offices, and other service providers is lawful. Many consumers record these calls to:
- Document promises or commitments made by representatives
- Preserve details of service agreements or billing disputes
- Create evidence if a disagreement arises later
- Remember complex instructions or information
Since many companies already record their calls and often announce this at the start, you are exercising the same right they do when you record from your end.
Calls Involving Disputes
Recording phone calls during disputes with landlords, contractors, neighbors, business partners, or creditors can provide valuable documentation. Indiana's one-party consent law protects these recordings as long as you are a participant. For specific guidance on landlord interactions, see Indiana landlord-tenant recording laws.
Recording Business Phone Calls in Indiana

Employer Recording Policies
Indiana businesses can record calls for quality assurance, training, compliance monitoring, and dispute resolution. Because Indiana follows one-party consent, a business employee participating in the call provides the necessary consent. The employer does not need consent from the customer or client on the other end.
Despite this, many Indiana businesses announce call recording as a standard practice. Common methods include:
- Automated announcements. "This call may be recorded for quality assurance and training purposes."
- Verbal notification by the representative. The employee states at the beginning of the call that recording is in progress.
- Tone alerts. A periodic beep tone during the conversation.
These announcements serve as a best practice rather than a legal requirement under Indiana law. They reduce friction with callers from other states and provide an additional layer of legal protection for businesses that handle interstate communications.
Federal Law Alignment
The federal Wiretap Act (18 U.S.C. 2511) also follows a one-party consent standard. This alignment means Indiana businesses operating under both state and federal jurisdiction face consistent rules. Federal law permits recording when one party to the communication consents, which matches Indiana's standard exactly.
Industry-Specific Requirements
Certain industries face additional recording obligations beyond Indiana's general consent rules:
- Financial services. Regulations from the SEC and FINRA may require recording of client calls and retention of those recordings for specified periods.
- Healthcare. HIPAA does not prohibit patients from recording their own calls with providers, but healthcare organizations must handle recordings containing protected health information (PHI) under HIPAA's privacy and security rules. For more, see Indiana medical recording laws.
- Legal profession. Attorneys should consider the Indiana Rules of Professional Conduct when recording calls with clients, opposing parties, or witnesses.
Interstate and Cross-State Phone Calls

The Two-State Problem
Phone call recording becomes complicated when parties are in different states with different consent laws. If you are in Indiana (one-party consent) calling someone in a two-party consent state, both states' laws may apply.
Courts have generally held that the stricter standard controls in interstate recording disputes. This means that if you call someone in California, Florida, or Pennsylvania, you may need all parties' consent even though Indiana only requires one.
Neighboring Illinois: A Critical Concern
Indiana shares a border with Illinois, which requires all-party consent for recording private conversations. If you are in Indiana calling someone in Illinois, the Illinois standard may apply. This is especially important for businesses in the Indianapolis, Gary, or Terre Haute areas that frequently communicate with contacts in Chicago or other Illinois locations.
Two-Party Consent States to Watch
If you regularly make calls to people in any of the following states, consider informing all parties or getting explicit consent:
| State | Consent Standard |
|---|---|
| California | All-party |
| Connecticut | All-party |
| Florida | All-party |
| Illinois | All-party |
| Maryland | All-party |
| Massachusetts | All-party |
| Montana | All-party |
| New Hampshire | All-party |
| Pennsylvania | All-party |
| Washington | All-party |
Best Practices for Interstate Calls
- Know where the other party is located. Consent requirements depend on physical location, not area code.
- When in doubt, inform all parties. A simple statement like "I am recording this call for my records" satisfies even the strictest all-party consent states.
- Document the other party's location if possible. This helps determine which state's law applies if a dispute arises.
- Businesses should default to all-party notice. Companies making calls across state lines benefit from routinely announcing recording to avoid liability.
VoIP, Zoom, and Video Conference Call Recording
Audio Recording of Virtual Meetings
Indiana's one-party consent law applies to the audio component of virtual meetings. If you participate in a Zoom call, Teams meeting, or Google Meet session, you can record the audio without informing other participants.
However, several practical considerations apply:
- Platform notifications. Most conferencing platforms display a recording indicator when someone uses the built-in recording feature. Using a separate, external recording device bypasses these notifications.
- Video component. The video recording portion raises separate privacy concerns under Indiana's voyeurism statute if participants are in private locations.
- Interstate participants. If any participant is located in a two-party consent state, the stricter standard may apply to the entire call.
AI Meeting Transcription Tools
AI-powered meeting transcription tools like Otter.ai, Fireflies.ai, and similar products record audio and generate transcripts. Using these tools on calls you participate in is lawful under Indiana's one-party consent rule. However, if participants are in two-party consent states, using AI notetakers without everyone's consent may violate those states' laws.
Indiana's 2024 AI legislation adds adjacent considerations. HEA 1133 (P.L. 81-2024), effective July 1, 2024, creates a civil cause of action for AI-generated media that depicts a political candidate in a materially deceptive way without a disclaimer. HEA 1047 (P.L. 79-2024), effective July 1, 2024, expanded IC 35-45-4-8 to cover AI-generated intimate imagery. Neither statute restricts ordinary call recording, but both are relevant when AI tools generate, manipulate, or synthesize voice or image content from recorded calls.
Call Recording Apps and Technology
Methods for Recording Phone Calls
Several approaches exist for recording phone calls in Indiana:
- Built-in phone features. Some Android devices include native call recording. Apple's iOS does not offer built-in call recording.
- Third-party apps. Apps like Rev Call Recorder, TapeACall, and Cube ACR provide call recording functionality.
- Dedicated recording devices. External voice recorders with phone adapters can capture calls from any phone type.
- VoIP platform features. Zoom, Teams, and Google Meet all offer built-in recording functionality.
Storage and Security Best Practices
After recording a call, protect the recording by:
- Backing up files to cloud storage and a local device
- Noting the date, time, and participants for each recording
- Storing recordings securely to prevent unauthorized access
- Preserving original files without editing for potential evidentiary use
- Keeping recordings organized by date and subject for easy retrieval
Using Phone Recordings as Evidence
Admissibility in Indiana Courts
Phone call recordings made legally under Indiana's one-party consent law are generally admissible as evidence. Courts consider:
- Authentication. Can you prove the recording is genuine and unaltered? Keeping the original file with metadata strengthens authentication.
- Relevance. Does the recording relate to the issues in the case?
- Hearsay rules. Some statements may be excluded under Indiana Rules of Evidence, though many exceptions apply to recorded conversations.
- Prejudicial effect. A judge may exclude a recording if its prejudicial effect substantially outweighs its probative value.
Common Uses in Legal Proceedings
Recorded phone calls are frequently used as evidence in:
- Divorce and custody disputes
- Employment discrimination and harassment claims
- Contract disputes where terms were discussed verbally
- Landlord-tenant disagreements
- Insurance claim disputes
- Debt collection violations
Penalties for Illegal Phone Call Recording
Criminal Consequences
Recording a phone call without any party's consent violates IC 35-33.5-5-5 and is classified as a Level 5 felony under IC 35-50-2-6:
| Penalty | Range |
|---|---|
| Prison | 1 to 6 years |
| Advisory sentence | 3 years |
| Fine | Up to $10,000 |
Each illegal recording constitutes a separate offense, so tapping multiple calls can result in multiple felony charges.
Civil Liability
Victims of illegal call recording can file civil lawsuits under IC 35-33.5-5-4 seeking:
- Liquidated damages of $100 per day of the violation, or $1,000, whichever is greater
- Actual damages for harm suffered
- Punitive damages at the court's discretion
- Attorney fees and court costs
The statute of limitations for civil claims is two years from the date the interception, disclosure, or use first occurred.
Evidence Suppression
Illegally recorded phone calls are generally inadmissible in Indiana courts. Both state and federal exclusionary rules prevent the use of evidence obtained through unlawful wiretapping. A recording that captures proof of someone else's wrongdoing will likely be thrown out if you obtained it illegally.
More Indiana Recording Laws
Audio Recording | Video Recording | Voyeurism & Hidden Cameras | Workplace Recording | Recording Police | Phone Call Recording | Security Cameras | Recording in Public | Landlord-Tenant | Dashcam Laws | Schools | Medical Recording
Back to Indiana Recording Laws
More Indiana Recording Topics
More Indiana Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I record a phone call in Indiana without telling the other person?
Yes. Indiana is a one-party consent state under IC 35-33.5-5. As long as you are a party to the call, you can record it without notifying the other person. You do not need to announce the recording, play a beep tone, or get any form of permission.
What if I call someone in Illinois from Indiana?
Illinois requires all-party consent for recording private conversations. When you call from Indiana to Illinois, the stricter Illinois standard may apply. The safest approach is to inform all parties when calling across state lines into a two-party consent state.
Can my employer record my work phone calls in Indiana?
Yes, if at least one person on the call consents. In most cases, the employer's representative on the call provides that consent. Employers commonly record calls for quality assurance, training, and compliance. Indiana's one-party consent law and the federal Wiretap Act both permit this practice.
Can I record a Zoom or Teams call under Indiana law?
You can record the audio portion of virtual meetings you participate in under Indiana's one-party consent rule. If any participant is in a two-party consent state, the stricter standard may apply. Most platforms also display a recording indicator when the built-in feature is used.
Is it legal to use a call recording app in Indiana?
Yes. There are no restrictions on the type of recording device or app you use. Third-party call recording apps, built-in phone features, and external recording devices are all legal as long as you are a participant in the call.
Can recorded phone calls be used as evidence in Indiana courts?
Yes, if the recording was made legally under one-party consent rules. Courts evaluate recordings for authenticity, relevance, hearsay issues, and whether probative value outweighs prejudicial effect. Illegally obtained recordings are generally inadmissible.
Updates
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected two wrong Indiana Public Law citation numbers: HEA 1047 of 2024 is Pub. L. 79-2024 (not 117-2024) and HEA 1133 of 2024 is Pub. L. 81-2024 (not 83-2024), per the Indiana General Assembly's own bill-tracking records.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Indiana Code, TITLE 35. CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE
§ 35-33.5-5-5Nonapplicability to interceptions authorized under federal law; classification of offensesIn forcecited in 13 of our articles
Sec. 5. (a) This section does not apply to a person who makes an interception authorized under federal law. (b) A person who knowingly or intentionally intercepts a communication in violation of this article commits unlawful interception, a Level 5 felony. (c) A person who, by virtue of the person's employment or official capacity in the criminal justice system, knowingly or intentionally uses or discloses the contents of an interception in violation of this article commits unlawful use or disclosure of an interception, a Level 5 felony.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at iga.in.gov
Cited in 2 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2007
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Edwards v. State (Indiana Court of Appeals 2007, 862 N.E.2d 1254)“…or disclosure of an interception, a Class C felony. I.C. § 35-33.5-5-5. The Indiana Wiretap Act defines interc…”
- State of Indiana v. John Lombardo (Indiana Supreme Court 2000)“…disclosure of an interception, a Class C felony. Ind. Code § 35-33.5-5-5 (1993) (emphases added). The statute…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 35-31.5-2-176"Interception"In forcecited in 2 of our articles
Sec. 176. "Interception", for purposes of IC 35-33.5, means the intentional recording or acquisition of the contents of an electronic communication by a person other than a sender or receiver of that communication, without the consent of the sender or receiver, by means of any instrument, device, or equipment under this article. This term includes the intentional recording or acquisition of communication through the use of a computer or a fax (facsimile transmission) machine. The term does not include recording or acquiring the contents of a radio transmission that is not: (1) scrambled or encrypted; (2) transmitted using modulation techniques whose essential parameters have been withheld from the public with the intention of preserving the privacy of the communication; (3) carried on a subcarrier or other signal subsidiary to a radio transmission; (4) transmitted over a communication system provided by a common carrier, unless the communication is a tone only paging system communication; or (5) transmitted on frequencies allocated under part 25, subpart D, E, or F of part 74, or part 94 of the Rules of the Federal Communications Commission, unless, in the case of…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at iga.in.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2019
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Edward Gaeta v. The Huntington National Bank (mem. dec.) (Indiana Court of Appeals 2019)“…App. 2005) (citing Ind. Code § 35-33.5-1-5 (now codified at Ind. Code § 35-31.5-2-176)), trans. denied; see also Wynne…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 35-50-2-6Class C felony; Level 5 felony; commission of nonsupport of child as Class D felonyIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
Sec. 6. (a) A person who commits a Class C felony (for a crime committed before July 1, 2014) shall be imprisoned for a fixed term of between two (2) and eight (8) years, with the advisory sentence being four (4) years. In addition, the person may be fined not more than ten thousand dollars ($10,000). (b) A person who commits a Level 5 felony (for a crime committed after June 30, 2014) shall be imprisoned for a fixed term of between one (1) and six (6) years, with the advisory sentence being three (3) years. In addition, the person may be fined not more than ten thousand dollars ($10,000).
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at iga.in.gov
Cited in 592 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Darryl Calvin v. State of Indiana (Indiana Supreme Court 2017, 87 N.E.3d 474)“…slature used the full “Level 6 felony conviction” term. See I.C. §§ 35-50-2-6(c), -7(d), (f) (2014); In re ITT Deriva…”
- Sutton v. State (Indiana Court of Appeals 1990, 562 N.E.2d 1310)“…ndant received eight years (the maximum sentence allowed by Ind. Code 35-50-2-6), along with credit for the 352 days he…”
- Bresson v. State (Indiana Court of Appeals 1986, 498 N.E.2d 91)“…s Code Ed.Repl.1985). Conviction of a class C felony, under I.C. 35-50-2-6 (Burns Code Ed.Rep1.1985), calls for a…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
United States Code Title 18
§ 2511Interception and disclosure of wire, oral, or electronic communications prohibitedIn forcecited in 418 of our articles
Except as otherwise specifically provided in this chapter any person who— intentionally intercepts, endeavors to intercept, or procures any other person to intercept or endeavor to intercept, any wire, oral, or electronic communication; intentionally uses, endeavors to use, or procures any other person to use or endeavor to use any electronic, mechanical, or other device to intercept any oral communication when— such device is affixed to, or otherwise transmits a signal through, a wire, cable, or other like connection used in wire communication; or such device transmits communications by radio, or interferes with the transmission of such communication; or such person knows, or has reason to know, that such device or any component thereof has been sent through the mail or transported in interstate or foreign commerce; or such use or endeavor to use (A) takes place on the premises of any business or other commercial establishment the operations of which affect interstate or foreign commerce; or (B) obtains or is for the purpose of obtaining information relating to the operations of any business or other commercial establishment the operations of which affect interstate or foreign…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 2,045 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Griggs-Ryan v. Smith (1990) applied the Section 2511(2)(d) prior-consent exception, treating a tenant repeatedly told that all incoming calls were taped as having impliedly consented. United States v. United States District Court (1972) read the then-current Section 2511(3) as conferring no presidential surveillance power.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Mitchell v. Forsyth (Supreme Court of the United States 1985, 472 U.S. 511)✓The Attorney General authorized a warrantless 1970 national security wiretap that caught the plaintiff's calls; the Court held the since-repealed Section 2511(3) disclaimer left the tap lawful under Title III, and that Mitchell had qualified immunity.
- United States v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan (Supreme Court of the United States 1972, 407 U.S. 297)✓The Attorney General approved warrantless wiretaps on members of a domestic group accused of bombing a CIA office; the Court read Section 2511(3) as a congressional disclaimer conferring no surveillance power, then held the Fourth Amendment required prior judicial approval.
- Forsyth v. Barr (Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit 1994, 19 F.3d 1527)✓Dallas police used, in an internal affairs probe of an officer, calls private parties allegedly intercepted illegally; assuming that was unlawful, the Fifth Circuit held Section 2517(1) and (2) allowed the disclosure and use, defeating the Section 2511(1)(c) and (d) claims.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Indiana Code IC 35-33.5-5(iga.in.gov).gov
- Indiana Code IC 35-31.5-2-176(iga.in.gov).gov
- Indiana Code IC 35-50-2-6(iga.in.gov).gov
- 18 U.S.C. 2511 - Federal Wiretap Act(law.cornell.edu)
- NLRB - Employee Rights(nlrb.gov).gov
- Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press - Indiana Recording Guide(rcfp.org)