Massachusetts
Massachusetts School Recording Laws
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 22, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 22, 2026. · 6 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Massachusetts requires all-party consent for audio recordings under Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 272, Section 99, and that rule applies inside school buildings without exception. Secretly recording a conversation at school is a felony. FERPA separately governs how schools store and share student education records, including any recordings maintained as part of a student file.
Recording in Massachusetts schools raises unique legal questions because students, parents, teachers, and administrators all have different interests at stake. The foundational rule remains the same: under Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 272, Section 99, secretly recording any conversation in a school is a felony carrying up to 5 years in state prison and a $10,000 fine. Massachusetts provides no misdemeanor alternative, and the law applies equally to adults and to minors old enough to be charged.
This guide covers recording rules for parents, students, and educators, the special considerations for IEP meetings, school security camera policies, and student privacy protections.
The Wiretap Statute in Schools
How Section 99 Applies to Schools
The Massachusetts wiretap statute does not contain a school-specific exception. The same rules that apply to workplaces, homes, and public spaces apply inside school buildings and on school grounds:
- Secret audio recording of any conversation is a felony
- All parties must know the recording is happening for it to be legal
- The location does not matter. A school hallway is treated the same as a private office.
- The recorder's identity does not matter. Parents, teachers, administrators, and students are all subject to the law.
Common School Recording Scenarios
Legal: A parent attends a school meeting and says "I am going to record this meeting" before the discussion begins. All participants are aware.
Illegal: A parent hides a phone in their bag to secretly record a conference with their child's teacher. This is a felony even if the parent's purpose is to document concerns about their child's education.
Legal: A school installs visible security cameras with posted signage in hallways and common areas (without audio recording).
Illegal: A teacher secretly records a conversation with a colleague about a student's behavior. Even between professionals, secret recording is a felony.
Parents' Recording Rights

Recording School Meetings
Parents in Massachusetts have the right to record meetings with teachers, administrators, and other school personnel, but they must follow the disclosure requirement:
- Announce the recording at the beginning of every meeting
- State clearly that you are recording, such as "I would like to record this meeting for my records"
- Give participants the opportunity to acknowledge the recording before proceeding
- Begin recording only after disclosure
The school does not have the authority to prohibit a parent from openly recording a meeting. While a school may have an internal policy about recording, that policy cannot override the parent's right to make an open, disclosed recording. The wiretap statute only prohibits secret recording, not open recording over someone's objection.
IEP Meetings and Special Education
Parents of students with Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) often want to record meetings to ensure accurate documentation of what was discussed and agreed upon. Federal law under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) does not specifically address recording of IEP meetings, but the Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) has addressed it.
Under Massachusetts practice:
- Parents may record IEP meetings as long as they notify the school in advance
- Schools may also record the meeting with advance notice to parents
- The school cannot refuse to hold the IEP meeting simply because the parent wants to record
- Both parties must know about the recording for it to comply with Section 99
- The recording should capture the entire meeting, not selected portions
The federal Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) has noted that state laws on recording must be followed, and in Massachusetts, this means the disclosure requirement applies.
Recording Phone Calls With School Staff
Parents who call the school to discuss their child's education, disciplinary issues, or other matters must follow the same rules as any other phone call in Massachusetts:
- Announce that you are recording before the conversation begins
- The school employee does not need to consent, but must be aware
- If the employee objects and hangs up, follow up in writing instead
Student Recording

Student Rights and Restrictions
Massachusetts students face the same wiretap statute restrictions as adults. A student who secretly records a teacher, fellow student, or administrator commits a felony under Section 99.
Students should understand:
- Secret recording of class lectures without the teacher's knowledge violates Section 99
- Recording bullying or harassment by hiding a phone is still a felony, even if the recording documents genuine misconduct
- Recording fights or altercations at school may be legal if the recording is open and obvious (such as holding up a phone to visibly record), but secret recording is not
- Sharing recordings of other students can also implicate privacy laws and school disciplinary codes
Students With Disabilities
Students with documented disabilities who need to record lectures as an academic accommodation must go through their school's disability services or 504/IEP team. The accommodation process should:
- Document the student's need for recording as part of their educational plan
- Provide written notification to teachers that recording will occur
- Establish guidelines for how recordings will be used and stored
- Ensure compliance with Section 99 through formal disclosure rather than secret recording
Teacher and Staff Recording

Teacher Recording of Students
Teachers who want to record classroom activities, lectures, or interactions must inform students (and for younger students, their parents) that recording is occurring. Teachers cannot:
- Secretly record conversations with students
- Secretly record meetings with parents
- Secretly record conversations with colleagues or administrators
- Use hidden recording devices in classrooms
Teacher Recording of Meetings
Teachers involved in employment disputes, disciplinary proceedings, or union negotiations may want to record interactions with administrators. The same rules apply:
- Recording must be openly disclosed before it begins
- The administrator does not need to consent but must be aware
- The teacher's union representative should be informed of the recording plan
- Union-related meetings may have additional recording considerations under the National Labor Relations Act
School Security Cameras
Camera Installation in Schools
Massachusetts schools commonly install security cameras for safety and security. The rules for school cameras follow the general Massachusetts framework:
- Silent video cameras in hallways, entrances, parking lots, and common areas are generally permitted
- Audio-capable cameras must comply with Section 99. Students, staff, and visitors must know about audio recording.
- Cameras in classrooms are becoming more common for security purposes. Silent cameras are generally permissible with notification to students and parents. Audio-capable cameras require full compliance with the wiretap statute.
- Cameras in restrooms, locker rooms, and changing areas are always prohibited
Notice Requirements
Schools should:
- Post visible signage at all entrances and in monitored areas stating that video surveillance is in progress
- Include camera policies in student and parent handbooks
- Notify staff about camera locations and capabilities in employment materials
- Specifically address audio recording capability if cameras have microphones
Remote Learning and Classroom Recording
The expansion of remote and hybrid learning has increased classroom recording. Schools that record lessons for remote students or for later review must:
- Inform all students and parents that classroom recording occurs
- Address recording in the school's technology acceptable use policy
- Ensure that recorded sessions are stored securely and accessed only for educational purposes
- Comply with student privacy protections when recordings contain identifiable student information
Student Privacy Protections
FERPA
The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) is a federal law that protects the privacy of student education records. FERPA applies to all schools that receive federal funding. Under FERPA:
- Audio and video recordings that contain identifiable student information are considered education records when maintained by the school
- Schools generally cannot release recordings containing student information without parental consent
- Parents have the right to inspect recordings that are part of their child's education record
- FERPA rights transfer to the student at age 18
Massachusetts Student Records Regulations
The Massachusetts Student Records Regulations (603 CMR 23.00) provide additional privacy protections beyond FERPA:
- Student records, including recordings, must be maintained securely
- Access to student records is limited to authorized personnel
- Parents and eligible students have the right to inspect and amend records
- Schools must have written policies for record retention and destruction
- Schools cannot share student recordings with third parties without proper authorization
Social Media and Student Recordings
When recordings made in schools end up on social media, several legal issues converge:
- Section 99 violations if the recording was made secretly
- FERPA violations if the school released identifiable student information
- Cyberbullying if the recording is used to harass or humiliate a student
- Massachusetts anti-bullying law (Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 71, Section 37O) requires schools to address cyberbullying that affects the school environment
School Resource Officers
Recording SROs in Schools
School Resource Officers (SROs) are law enforcement officers assigned to schools. Under the First Circuit's ruling in Project Veritas v. Rollins (2020), recording police performing official duties in public is protected by the First Amendment. This protection extends to recording SROs performing law enforcement functions in public areas of a school.
However, the school setting adds complexity:
- Recording an SRO in a school hallway during a public interaction is likely protected
- Recording an SRO during a private meeting with a student or parent may involve different considerations
- Schools may have policies restricting recording on campus that apply to the act of recording, separate from the wiretap statute
- Student privacy interests may limit the ability to record interactions involving other students
Massachusetts Recording Laws by Topic
Phone Call Recording | Audio Recording | Video Recording | Workplace Recording | Recording Police | Security Cameras | Recording in Public | Landlord-Tenant | Dashcam Laws | Schools | Medical Recording | Voyeurism & Hidden Cameras
Back to Massachusetts Recording Laws
More Massachusetts Recording Topics
More Massachusetts Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I record my child's IEP meeting in Massachusetts?
Yes, but you must inform the school in advance that you intend to record. Massachusetts law requires that all parties know about the recording. The school cannot refuse to hold the IEP meeting because you want to record, but you must provide advance notice so the recording is not secret.
Can a student record a class lecture in Massachusetts?
Only with the teacher's knowledge. Secretly recording a lecture violates Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 272, Section 99 and is a felony. Students who need to record lectures as a disability accommodation should work through their school's 504 or IEP team to establish a formal accommodation that includes teacher notification.
Can schools have security cameras in Massachusetts?
Yes. Schools can install silent video cameras in hallways, entrances, and common areas with posted signage. Cameras in restrooms, locker rooms, and changing areas are always prohibited. If cameras have audio capability, the school must comply with the wiretap statute by ensuring all persons know about the recording.
Can a parent secretly record a teacher in Massachusetts?
No. Secretly recording a teacher is a felony carrying up to 5 years in state prison and a $10,000 fine. There is no exception for parents concerned about their child's education. You can record the teacher openly by announcing the recording before the conversation begins.
Can a student record bullying at school?
A student can openly and visibly record an incident, such as holding up a phone to film. However, secretly recording conversations, even to document bullying, violates the Massachusetts wiretap statute and is a felony. Students experiencing bullying should report it to school administrators or use the school's anti-bullying procedures.
Updates
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 272
§ 99Interception of wire and oral communicationsIn forcecited in 19 of our articles
Section 99. Interception of wire and oral communications.— A. Preamble. The general court finds that organized crime exists within the commonwealth and that the increasing activities of organized crime constitute a grave danger to the public welfare and safety. Organized crime, as it exists in the commonwealth today, consists of a continuing conspiracy among highly organized and disciplined groups to engage in supplying illegal goods and services. In supplying these goods and services organized crime commits unlawful acts and employs brutal and violent tactics. Organized crime is infiltrating legitimate business activities and depriving honest businessmen of the right to make a living. The general court further finds that because organized crime carries on its activities through layers of insulation and behind a wall of secrecy, government has been unsuccessful in curtailing and eliminating it. Normal investigative procedures are not effective in the investigation of illegal acts committed by organized crime.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at malegislature.gov
Cited in 271 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Commonwealth v. Blood (1987) read Section 99 as generally proscribing secret recording of oral communications without all parties' consent, and suppressed under art. 14 a warrantless police recording made with one party's consent. Commonwealth v. Vitello (1975) held Section 99 substantially complies with federal Title III.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Commonwealth v. Vitello (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court 1975, 367 Mass. 224)✓In a gaming prosecution built on wiretapped phone calls, the SJC gave chapter 272 section 99 its first full review and held the state wiretap statute substantially complies with federal Title III and that the warrants issued under it met both standards.
- Commonwealth v. Blood (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court 1987, 400 Mass. 61)✓Police wired an informant who recorded conversations in private homes about a planned break-in; the SJC held the recordings fell within section 99's one-party-consent exception but that article 14 nonetheless required a warrant, and reversed the convictions.
- Commonwealth v. D'Amour (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court 1999, 428 Mass. 725)✓The SJC upheld a section 99 wiretap of a widow suspected of arranging her husband's murder for insurance money, holding the district attorney's written designation of an assistant satisfied Vitello and that probable cause supported the organized crime connection.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Massachusetts Recording Laws (2026): Two-Party Consent Rules, Massachusetts Landlord-Tenant Recording Laws, Massachusetts Nursing Home Camera Laws: All-Party Consent Risks
Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 71
§ 37OSchool bullying prohibited; bullying prevention and intervention plans; reporting of bullying incident dateIn force
Section 37O. (a) As used in this section the following words shall, unless the context clearly requires otherwise, have the following meaning:- ''Approved private day or residential school'', a school that accepts, through agreement with a school committee, a child requiring special education pursuant to section 10 of chapter 71B. ''Bullying'', the repeated use by one or more students or by a member of a school staff including, but not limited to, an educator, administrator, school nurse, cafeteria worker, custodian, bus driver, athletic coach, advisor to an extracurricular activity or paraprofessional of a written, verbal or electronic expression or a physical act or gesture or any combination thereof, directed at a victim that: (i) causes physical or emotional harm to the victim or damage to the victim's property; (ii) places the victim in reasonable fear of harm to himself or of damage to his property; (iii) creates a hostile environment at school for the victim; (iv) infringes on the rights of the victim at school; or (v) materially and substantially disrupts the education process or the orderly operation of a school.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at malegislature.gov
Cited in 9 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Cormier v. City of Lynn (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court 2018, 479 Mass. 35)“…tibullying statute was enacted in 2010 and amended in 2014. G. L. c. 71, § 37O, inserted by St. 2010, c. 92, § 5, and…”
- L. M. v. Town of Middleborough, Massachusetts (Court of Appeals for the First Circuit 2024, 103 F.4th 854)“…Bostock v. Clayton Cnty., Ga., 590 U.S. 644 (2020); Mass. G.L. ch. 71, § 37O; Mass. G.L. ch. 76, § 5. No…”
- Doe v. Hopkinton Public Schools (Court of Appeals for the First Circuit 2021)“…They further argued that the "emotional harm" prong of Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 71, § 37O is unconstitutional. They also…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 272, Section 99 - Wiretapping Statute(malegislature.gov).gov
- Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE)(doe.mass.edu).gov
- Massachusetts Student Records Regulations - 603 CMR 23.00(doe.mass.edu).gov
- Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA)(www2.ed.gov).gov
- Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA)(sites.ed.gov).gov
- Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 71, Section 37O - Anti-Bullying Law(malegislature.gov).gov