Kansas
Kansas Surveillance Camera Laws (2026 Guide)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 16, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 16, 2026. · 7 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

title: "Kansas Surveillance Camera Laws: What You Need to Know in 2026" meta_description: "Learn about Kansas surveillance camera laws, including home security cameras, workplace monitoring, hidden camera restrictions under KSA 21-6101, and audio recording rules." featured_image: "/images/pages/kansas-surveillance-camera-laws/featured.webp" last_updated: "2026-03-15"
Overview of Kansas Surveillance Camera Laws
Kansas does not have a single, standalone surveillance camera statute that governs every type of video recording. Instead, the state relies on a combination of criminal privacy laws, wiretapping statutes, and common law privacy principles to regulate when and where cameras can be used.
The primary statute that affects surveillance cameras in Kansas is K.S.A. 21-6101, titled "Breach of Privacy." This law makes it a crime to use recording devices to invade another person's reasonable expectation of privacy.
For audio recording, Kansas follows a one-party consent rule. As long as one person in a conversation agrees to the recording, it is legal. This is covered under the same breach of privacy statute and supplemented by the Kansas wiretapping provisions in K.S.A. 22-2515 through K.S.A. 22-2518.
Understanding how these laws interact is important for anyone who uses home security cameras, workplace surveillance systems, doorbell cameras, or nanny cams in Kansas.
Home Security Camera Laws in Kansas
Where You Can Legally Place Cameras

Kansas law does not prohibit homeowners from installing security cameras on their own property. You are generally free to place cameras in and around your home to protect your family and belongings. Common legal placements include:
- Front and back doors to capture visitors and deliveries
- Driveways and garages for vehicle security
- Living rooms and kitchens for general home monitoring
- Backyards and patios to deter trespassing
The key legal principle is the reasonable expectation of privacy. Areas that are visible from public spaces or common areas of your own home are fair game for camera placement.
Where Cameras Are Prohibited
Even on your own property, you should keep cameras out of locations where someone has a reasonable expectation of privacy, though the Kansas criminal statute is narrower than many people assume. K.S.A. 21-6101(a)(3) reaches "entering with intent to listen surreptitiously to private conversations in a private place or to observe the personal conduct of any other person or persons entitled to privacy therein," so physical entry is an element of that subsection and it says nothing about cameras. The device subsection, K.S.A. 21-6101(a)(4), covers only a device for hearing, recording, amplifying or broadcasting sounds.
Kansas has no provision that makes silent video observation of a private place a crime when the person recording did not enter the place and the subject is not nude or in a state of undress. Hidden video is reached by K.S.A. 21-6101(a)(6), which applies when the person recorded is nude, in a state of undress, or recorded under or through clothing. Outside those situations, a camera aimed into a private space is generally addressed through civil invasion of privacy claims, landlord and tenant obligations, or the stalking statute where the conduct is targeted and repeated.
Cameras should be kept out of:
- Bathrooms used by guests, tenants, or household members
- Bedrooms occupied by other adults, especially guests or tenants
- Changing areas or any space where someone would reasonably undress
If you rent out part of your home or have live-in guests, their private rooms are off-limits for surveillance without their explicit consent.
Audio Recording on Home Security Systems
Many modern security cameras include built-in microphones. In Kansas, the one-party consent rule means that if you are present and participating in a conversation being captured by the camera, the audio recording is legal.
However, if a camera with audio capabilities is recording conversations in your home while you are not present or not a party to the conversation, this could violate K.S.A. 21-6101(a)(4). That subsection prohibits installing or using devices to record sounds in a private place without the consent of the people entitled to privacy there.
To stay on the safe side, consider disabling audio recording features on indoor cameras, or post clear notices that audio and video recording is in progress.
Hidden Cameras and Voyeurism Under KSA 21-6101
What the Law Prohibits

Kansas takes hidden camera violations seriously. Under K.S.A. 21-6101(a)(6), it is a felony to use a camcorder, motion picture camera, photographic camera, or any similar device to secretly videotape, film, photograph, or record another identifiable person in any of these situations:
- Under or through the person's clothing without their knowledge or consent
- While the person is nude or in a state of undress in a place where they have a reasonable expectation that such recording would not occur
- With the intent to invade the privacy of the person being recorded
This provision covers hidden cameras in bathrooms, locker rooms, dressing rooms, hotel rooms and similar places, but only where the person recorded is nude, in a state of undress, or recorded under or through clothing. Secretly filming a fully clothed person in one of those rooms does not meet the elements of subsection (a)(6), although it may still support a civil invasion of privacy claim.
Distributing Secretly Recorded Images
Kansas law goes further than just prohibiting the recording itself. Under K.S.A. 21-6101(a)(7), disseminating any videotape, photograph, film, or image obtained through a violation of subsection (a)(6) is a separate and more serious crime.
Additionally, K.S.A. 21-6101(a)(8) addresses what is commonly called "revenge porn." It is illegal to disseminate nude or sexually explicit images of an identifiable person aged 18 or older when:
- The person had a reasonable expectation of privacy
- The dissemination was done with the intent to harass, threaten, or intimidate
- The person did not consent to the dissemination
This subsection also covers images that have been created, altered, or modified by artificial intelligence or other digital means to appear to depict the person, addressing the growing concern of deepfake technology.
Penalties for Hidden Camera Crimes
The penalties under K.S.A. 21-6101 vary based on the specific violation:
| Violation | Classification | Kansas sentencing grid range | Maximum Fine |
|---|---|---|---|
| Surreptitious listening or recording (subsections a(1) through a(5)) | Class A nonperson misdemeanor | Up to 1 year in county jail | $2,500 |
| Secret recording of undressed person (subsection a(6)) | Severity level 8 person felony | Grid row of 7 to 23 months; presumptive disposition is nonimprisonment | $100,000 |
| Distributing secretly recorded images (subsection a(7)) | Severity level 5 person felony | Grid row of 31 to 136 months; presumptive disposition is imprisonment | $300,000 |
| Revenge porn / non-consensual intimate images (subsection a(8)) | Severity level 8 person felony | Grid row of 7 to 23 months; presumptive disposition is nonimprisonment | $100,000 |
| Second conviction of a(6) or a(8) within 5 years | Severity level 5 person felony | Grid row of 31 to 136 months; presumptive disposition is imprisonment | $300,000 |
The ranges above are the full width of each severity level's row on the Kansas nondrug sentencing grid, spanning all nine criminal history categories, so the exact number depends on the offender's criminal history score under the Kansas Sentencing Guidelines. A defendant with no prior record falls at the low end of the row, not the middle or the top.
Severity level 8 also sits below the grid's dispositional line. K.S.A. 21-6804(f) provides that an offense classified in a grid block below that line carries a presumptive disposition of nonimprisonment, so a first conviction under subsection (a)(6) or (a)(8) is presumptively probation rather than prison, with the grid term available if probation is revoked or the court departs. Severity level 5 sits above the dispositional line, where the presumption is imprisonment, and the statute permits an optional nonprison sentence only in grid blocks 5-H and 5-I.
Audio Recording Laws in Kansas (One-Party Consent)
The One-Party Consent Rule
Kansas is a one-party consent state. Under K.S.A. 21-6101, you can legally record a conversation as long as at least one participant in the conversation consents to the recording. In most cases, this means you can record your own conversations with others without telling them.
This applies to both in-person conversations and telephone calls. The one-party rule comes from the text of the statute rather than from case law: K.S.A. 21-6101(a)(1) makes interception a crime only when it is done "without the consent of the sender or receiver," so consent from either side of the communication takes the conduct outside that subsection.
What Audio Recording Is Illegal
Recording becomes illegal in Kansas when:
- No party to the conversation consents. You cannot plant a recording device to capture a conversation between other people when you are not present or participating.
- You intercept communications you are not a party to. Under K.S.A. 21-6101(a)(5), intercepting telephone, telegraph, or wireless communications without the consent of the person who controls the facility is a crime.
- You record sounds in a private place without consent. Under K.S.A. 21-6101(a)(4), installing or using devices to record sounds in a private place without the consent of the person entitled to privacy is illegal.
Penalties for Illegal Audio Recording
Illegal interception or recording of private communications is a Class A nonperson misdemeanor, punishable by up to one year in county jail and a fine of up to $2,500.
Beyond criminal penalties, victims can also file a civil lawsuit. Under K.S.A. 22-2518, any person whose communications are unlawfully intercepted, disclosed, or used may recover:
- Actual damages, or a minimum of $100 per day for each day of violation, or $1,000, whichever amount is greater
- Punitive damages as the court sees fit
- Reasonable attorney's fees and litigation costs
Workplace Surveillance Camera Laws in Kansas
Employer Rights and Limitations

Kansas does not have a specific workplace surveillance statute. Employers in Kansas generally follow federal guidelines, which allow video surveillance in common work areas for legitimate business purposes such as preventing theft, ensuring safety, and monitoring productivity.
Employers may typically place cameras in:
- Lobbies and reception areas
- Hallways and stairwells
- Parking lots and loading docks
- Retail sales floors and warehouse spaces
- Break rooms (though this is more controversial)
Where Employers Cannot Place Cameras
Kansas law prohibits cameras in any area where employees have a reasonable expectation of privacy. Under K.S.A. 21-6101, employers cannot place cameras in:
- Restrooms and bathrooms
- Locker rooms and changing areas
- Private offices where the door is closed (this is less clear-cut and depends on circumstances)
- Nursing or lactation rooms
Placing cameras in these locations could expose an employer to both criminal prosecution under the breach of privacy statute and civil lawsuits from affected employees.
Audio Recording in the Workplace
Employers should exercise caution with audio recording. While Kansas's one-party consent rule allows recording conversations you are part of, an employer who installs audio recording devices in the workplace without being a participant in the conversations being captured could violate both state and federal wiretapping laws.
Best practices for Kansas employers include:
- Posting visible notices that video surveillance is in use
- Including surveillance policies in employee handbooks
- Having employees sign acknowledgments of surveillance practices
- Avoiding audio recording unless there is a specific, documented business need and proper consent
Neighbor Disputes Over Security Cameras
Can Your Neighbor Record Your Property?
One of the most common surveillance disputes involves neighbors pointing cameras at each other's property. In Kansas, the general rule is that your neighbor can record areas that are visible from public spaces or from their own property.
A neighbor's camera that captures your front yard, driveway, or the exterior of your home is typically legal, because these areas are visible to anyone passing by and carry a reduced expectation of privacy.
When a Neighbor's Camera Crosses the Line
A neighbor's surveillance may become illegal under Kansas law when:
- The camera is positioned to see into private interior spaces such as bedrooms or bathrooms through windows
- Audio recording captures your private conversations without your consent, violating the breach of privacy statute
- The surveillance amounts to harassment or stalking under K.S.A. 21-5427, especially if the camera follows your movements or is clearly intended to intimidate
Steps You Can Take
If you believe a neighbor's camera is violating your privacy, consider these options:
- Talk to your neighbor first. Many disputes can be resolved by asking the neighbor to adjust the camera angle.
- Install privacy fencing or landscaping. Blocking the camera's line of sight is often the simplest solution.
- Document the intrusion. Take photos showing exactly what the camera captures, including any views into your private spaces.
- Contact local law enforcement. If the camera captures areas where you have a reasonable expectation of privacy, file a police report referencing K.S.A. 21-6101.
- Consult an attorney. Kansas common law recognizes civil claims for invasion of privacy when the intrusion is intentional and outrageous.
HOA Rules and Local Ordinances
Some Kansas homeowners associations (HOAs) have their own rules about security cameras, and where that authority comes from matters. The Kansas Uniform Common Interest Owners Bill of Rights Act applies only to common interest communities that contain 12 or more units that may be used for residential purposes (K.S.A. 58-4605 and K.S.A. 58-4606), so many smaller Kansas associations fall outside it entirely and are governed by their declaration and general corporate law. Where the act does apply, the association's power to adopt and amend rules comes from K.S.A. 58-4608(a)(1), and K.S.A. 58-4617(c) allows rules establishing construction, design and aesthetic standards only if the declaration so provides. Every rule must also be reasonable. In practice, your recorded declaration and covenants, not the statute on its own, determine whether an exterior camera needs board approval.
Before installing exterior cameras, check your HOA covenants for any restrictions on:
- Camera placement and visibility
- The type and size of cameras allowed
- Whether approval from the HOA board is required
Local city ordinances may also apply. Contact your local city clerk's office to ask about any additional rules that apply in your area.
Nanny Cams and In-Home Monitoring
Legal Use of Nanny Cams in Kansas
Using a nanny cam to monitor a babysitter or caregiver in your home is generally legal in Kansas, with important restrictions. You can place video-only cameras in common areas of your home such as living rooms, kitchens, and playrooms.
Kansas law does not require you to inform a babysitter that a video camera is recording in common areas of your home, though many legal experts recommend doing so as a best practice.
Restrictions on Nanny Cams
Even in your own home, Kansas law limits where and how you can use nanny cams:
- No cameras in bathrooms or bedrooms where the caregiver might change clothes or use the facilities. K.S.A. 21-6101(a)(6) makes it a felony to secretly record someone in a state of undress.
- Audio recording requires caution. If your nanny cam records audio and you are not present during the recorded conversations, you may not have one-party consent. Consider using video-only recording or posting notices about audio recording.
- Live-in caregivers have greater privacy rights. If a nanny or caregiver lives in your home, their private bedroom and bathroom are off-limits for surveillance.
Recommendations for Parents
To use nanny cams legally and effectively in Kansas:
- Place cameras only in common areas (living room, kitchen, playroom, nursery)
- Use video-only recording to avoid audio consent issues
- Consider informing your caregiver about the cameras as a matter of transparency
- Never place cameras in bathrooms, the caregiver's private bedroom, or changing areas
- Store recorded footage securely and limit access to it
Doorbell Cameras and Smart Home Devices
Doorbell cameras like Ring, Nest, and Arlo have become extremely popular across Kansas. These devices are generally legal because they record areas that are already visible to the public, such as front porches, walkways, and streets.
Key considerations for doorbell camera users in Kansas:
- Video recording of your porch and front walkway is legal. These are not areas where visitors have a reasonable expectation of privacy.
- Audio recording features should be used carefully. Most doorbell cameras have two-way audio. Under the one-party consent rule, you can record a conversation you are actively participating in through the doorbell speaker. However, passively recording conversations between visitors on your porch when you are not participating may raise legal concerns.
- Footage may be requested by law enforcement. Police in Kansas may ask for doorbell camera footage related to crimes in your area. You are generally not required to provide it without a warrant, but many homeowners voluntarily share footage to assist investigations.
- HOA restrictions may apply. Some HOAs restrict the visibility or placement of doorbell cameras on the exterior of homes.
Civil Liability for Surveillance Violations
Beyond criminal penalties, Kansas recognizes civil claims for invasion of privacy. The Kansas Supreme Court has long recognized the common law right to privacy, sometimes called the right to be let alone.
To succeed in a civil invasion of privacy lawsuit in Kansas, a plaintiff must generally show:
- The intrusion was intentional
- The intrusion was highly offensive to a reasonable person
- The matter intruded upon was private
- The intrusion caused anguish or suffering
Under K.S.A. 22-2518, victims of illegal electronic surveillance can recover actual damages (with a minimum of $100 per day or $1,000, whichever is greater), punitive damages, and attorney's fees.
Property owners who discover hidden cameras or unauthorized recording devices may also have claims for trespass if the device was placed on their property without permission.
Related Kansas Camera and Privacy Laws
- Kansas Recording Laws covers the consent rule that governs camera audio in Kansas.
- Kansas Security Camera Recording Rules explains the recording-law side of camera use.
- Kansas Biometric Privacy Laws addresses facial recognition and biometric data.
- Kansas Ring Doorbell Laws covers video doorbell rules in Kansas.
Common Camera Questions
These national guides answer the most common surveillance camera questions:
Frequently Asked Questions
Is it legal to have security cameras outside my home in Kansas?
Yes. Kansas law allows homeowners to install security cameras on the exterior of their property. You can record your front yard, driveway, backyard, and other outdoor areas. The cameras should be positioned to primarily capture your own property. While incidentally recording portions of a neighbor's property or public areas is generally acceptable, intentionally focusing cameras on a neighbor's private spaces could create legal issues under K.S.A. 21-6101.
Can I record a conversation in Kansas without the other person knowing?
Yes, as long as you are a participant in the conversation. Kansas is a one-party consent state under K.S.A. 21-6101, which means you can record any conversation you are part of without informing the other participants. However, you cannot record a conversation between other people when you are not present or participating. Doing so is a Class A nonperson misdemeanor punishable by up to one year in jail and a $2,500 fine.
What are the penalties for placing a hidden camera in a bathroom or bedroom in Kansas?
Placing a hidden camera to secretly record someone who is nude, in a state of undress, or under or through their clothing is a severity level 8 person felony under K.S.A. 21-6101(a)(6). Severity level 8 falls below the dispositional line on the Kansas nondrug sentencing grid, so under K.S.A. 21-6804(f) the presumptive disposition for a first offense is nonimprisonment rather than prison. The level 8 grid row runs from 7 to 23 months across all nine criminal history categories, and a defendant with no prior record sits at the low end of that row; the maximum fine is $100,000. Distributing the recorded images is a severity level 5 person felony under subsection (a)(7), which sits above the dispositional line, with a grid row of 31 to 136 months and a fine of up to $300,000. A second conviction for the recording offense within five years is also elevated to a severity level 5 person felony.
Do I have to tell my babysitter about nanny cams in my Kansas home?
Kansas law does not specifically require you to inform a babysitter about video-only cameras in common areas of your home, such as the living room or kitchen. However, you cannot place cameras in bathrooms or bedrooms where the babysitter might undress. If your camera also records audio, the one-party consent rule means you should be a participant in any conversation being recorded, or you should inform the babysitter about the audio recording. Many legal experts recommend disclosing nanny cams as a best practice.
Can my employer legally put cameras in the workplace in Kansas?
Yes, employers in Kansas can install surveillance cameras in common work areas such as lobbies, hallways, sales floors, and parking lots for legitimate business purposes. However, cameras are prohibited in areas where employees have a reasonable expectation of privacy, including restrooms, locker rooms, and changing areas. Employers should notify employees about surveillance through posted signs and written policies. Audio recording in the workplace requires extra caution to comply with state and federal wiretapping laws.
Updates
Corrected the scope of K.S.A. 21-6101: subsection (a)(3) requires entry and (a)(6) applies only where the person recorded is nude, in a state of undress, or recorded under or through clothing; clarified that a first severity level 8 conviction is presumptively probation rather than 7 to 23 months in prison; corrected the source of Kansas HOA rule authority; and removed an uncited claim that the Kansas Supreme Court established the one-party consent rule.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Kansas Statutes Annotated, Chapter 21: CRIMES AND PUNISHMENTS
§ 21-6101Breach of privacy.In forcecited in 26 of our articles
(a) Breach of privacy is knowingly and without lawful authority: (1) Intercepting, without the consent of the sender or receiver, a message by telephone, telegraph, letter or other means of private communication; (2) divulging, without the consent of the sender or receiver, the existence or contents of such message if such person knows that the message was illegally intercepted, or if such person illegally learned of the message in the course of employment with an agency in transmitting such message; (3) entering with intent to listen surreptitiously to private conversations in a private place or to observe the personal conduct of any other person or persons entitled to privacy therein; (4) installing or using outside or inside a private place any device for hearing, recording, amplifying or broadcasting sounds originating in such place, which sounds would not ordinarily be audible or comprehensible without the use of such device, without the consent of the person or persons entitled to privacy therein; (5) installing or using any device or equipment for the interception of any telephone, telegraph or other wire or wireless communication without the consent of the person in…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ksrevisor.gov
Cited in 8 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Recent Kansas decisions construe the image-dissemination subsection, K.S.A. 21-6101(a)(8), not the interception subsections. State v. Ivy (2025) held a reasonable expectation of privacy under that subsection has a subjective and an objective component. State v. Jamil (2026), unpublished, found disseminating needs no jury definition.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Ivy (Court of Appeals of Kansas 2025)✓Ivy posted on Snapchat a sexual video his ex-girlfriend had recorded and texted him during their relationship; the court applied a subjective and objective two-part test and held a jury could find she kept a reasonable expectation of privacy, affirming the conviction.
- In re Belcher (Supreme Court of Kansas 2024, 552 P.3d 1213)“…deotape, photograph, film or image obtained in violation of K.S.A. 21-6101(a)(6) or (a)(8), and amendments…”
- State v. Jamil (Court of Appeals of Kansas 2026)✓Jamil secretly filmed a woman undressed and unconscious at his home, then sent the videos to her boyfriend; the court held that sharing with a single recipient can be disseminating under K.S.A. 21-6101(a)(8) and that intent to harass could be inferred from his conduct.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Kansas Audio Recording Laws, Kansas Dashcam Laws: Mounting Rules, Audio Recording, and Evidence (2026), Kansas Phone Call Recording Laws
§ 21-5427Stalking.In forcecited in 5 of our articles
(a) Stalking is: (1) Recklessly engaging in a course of conduct targeted at a specific person which would cause a reasonable person in the circumstances of the targeted person to fear for such person's safety, or the safety of a member of such person's immediate family and the targeted person is actually placed in such fear; (2) engaging in a course of conduct targeted at a specific person with knowledge that the course of conduct will place the targeted person in fear for such person's safety or the safety of a member of such person's immediate family; (3) after being served with, or otherwise provided notice of, any protective order included in K.S.A. 21-3843, prior to its repeal or K.S.A.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ksrevisor.gov
Cited in 12 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Kansas courts have construed K.S.A. 21-5427. State v. Loganbill (2022) held reckless stalking requires the targeted person's subjective and objectively reasonable fear, and secretly photographing or filming someone repeatedly may be a course of conduct. State v. Harrington (2026) affirmed a stalking conviction for covert GPS tracking.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Loganbill (Court of Appeals of Kansas 2022)✓A fourth grade teacher secretly photographed and filmed a ten year old student's buttocks all school year; the court affirmed the reckless stalking conviction, holding such repeated secret filming can be a course of conduct and that the child's fear may arise after it ends.
- State v. Colwell (Court of Appeals of Kansas 2025)✓Days after a protection from stalking order issued, Colwell sent unsigned flowers to J.M. and called her from an unknown number; the court held the officer's return of service satisfied the disputed notice element of K.S.A. 21-5427(a)(3) and affirmed the stalking conviction.
- State v. Hernandez (Court of Appeals of Kansas 2019)✓Hernandez pleaded no contest to misdemeanor stalking on a complaint citing K.S.A. 21-5427 without naming a subsection; the court refused to let him withdraw the plea but remanded for findings fixing the subsection, because it changes the level of any second offense.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Kansas GPS Tracking Laws: Is It Legal to Put a Tracker on a Car? (2026), Kansas Laws on Recording in Public, Kansas Employee Monitoring Laws (2026): Workplace Surveillance Rights
§ 21-6602Classification of misdemeanors and terms of confinement; possible disposition.In forcecited in 3 of our articles
(a) For the purpose of sentencing, the following classes of misdemeanors and the punishment and the terms of confinement authorized for each class are established: (1) Class A, the sentence for which shall be a definite term of confinement in the county jail which shall be fixed by the court and shall not exceed one year; (2) class B, the sentence for which shall be a definite term of confinement in the county jail which shall be fixed by the court and shall not exceed six months; (3) class C, the sentence for which shall be a definite term of confinement in the county jail which shall be fixed by the court and shall not exceed one month; and (4) unclassified misdemeanors, which shall include all crimes declared to be misdemeanors without specification as to class, the sentence for which shall be in accordance with the sentence specified in the statute that defines the crime; if no penalty is provided in such law, the sentence shall be the same penalty as provided herein for a class C misdemeanor. (b) Upon conviction of a misdemeanor, a person may be punished by a fine, as provided in K.S.A.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ksrevisor.gov
Cited in 13 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Stover (Court of Appeals of Kansas 2026)“…endant to serve up to one year in jail for each conviction. K.S.A. 21-6602(a)(1). Additionally, the district court…”
- State v. Vallette (Court of Appeals of Kansas 2026)“…s, all of Vallette's convictions were class B misdemeanors. K.S.A. 21-6602(a)(2) provides that a jail sentence for…”
- State v. Sobek (Court of Appeals of Kansas 2025)“…ion of K.S.A. 8-1567(a)(2)-(3), K.S.A. 8-1567(b)(1)(B), and K.S.A. 21-6602(a)(1). In addition, the State charged S…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Kansas Smart Glasses Recording Laws (K.S.A. 21-6101), Kansas Recording Laws (2026): One-Party Consent Rules
§ 21-6611Fines; crimes committed on or after July 1, 1993.In forcecited in 4 of our articles
(a) A person who has been convicted of a felony may, in addition to the sentence authorized by law, be ordered to pay a fine which shall be fixed by the court as follows: (1) For any off-grid felony crime, or any felony ranked in severity level 1 of the drug grid committed prior to July 1, 2012, or in severity levels 1 or 2 of the drug grid committed on or after July 1, 2012, as provided in K.S.A. 21-6805, and amendments thereto, a sum not exceeding $500,000; (2) for any felony ranked in severity levels 1 through 5 of the nondrug grid as provided in K.S.A. 21-6804, and amendments thereto, or in severity levels 2 or 3 of the drug grid committed prior to July 1, 2012, or in severity levels 3 or 4 of the drug grid committed on or after July 1, 2012, as provided in K.S.A. 21-6805, and amendments thereto, a sum not exceeding $300,000; and (3) for any felony ranked in severity levels 6 through 10 of the nondrug grid as provided in K.S.A. 21-6804, and amendments thereto, or in severity level 4 of the drug grid committed prior to July 1, 2012, or in severity level 5 of the drug grid committed on or after July 1, 2012, as provided in K.S.A.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ksrevisor.gov
Cited in 6 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Heinzman v. State (Court of Appeals of Kansas 2026)“…olation when, in fact, the maximum amount was $300,000. See K.S.A. 21-6611(a)(2). She also…”
- State v. Abell (Court of Appeals of Kansas 2026)“…hose two cases for the appropriate fines in compliance with K.S.A. 21-6611(a)(3), and for the district court to de…”
- State v. Washington (Court of Appeals of Kansas 2025)“…nclude fines, in addition to or instead of jail time, under K.S.A. 21-6611. Washington's argument misappl…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Kansas Statutes Annotated, Chapter 22: CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
§ 22-2518Same; civil action for damages; defense available in civil and criminal actions.In forcecited in 11 of our articles
(1) Any person whose wire, oral or electronic communication is intercepted, disclosed or used in violation of this act shall have a civil cause of action against any person who intercepts, discloses or uses, or procures any other person to intercept, disclose or use, such communications, and shall be entitled to recover from any such person: (a) Actual damages, but not less than liquidated damages computed at the rate of $100 a day for each day of violation or $1,000, whichever is greater; (b) punitive damages; and (c) reasonable attorneys' fees and other litigation costs reasonably incurred. (2) A good faith reliance by any person on a court order authorizing the interception of any wire, oral or electronic communication shall constitute a complete defense in any civil or criminal action brought against such person based upon such interception.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ksrevisor.gov
Cited in 6 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Gibson (Supreme Court of Kansas 1994, 255 Kan. 474)“…f unlawfully intercepted *481 wire or oral communications. K.S.A. 22-2518 establishes a civil cause of action for…”
- Fields v. Atchison, Topeka, & Santa Fe Railway Co. (District Court, D. Kansas 1997, 985 F. Supp. 1308)“…18 U.S.C. § 2510 et seq., and the Kansas Wiretap Act, K.S.A. 22-2518, and invaded their privacy by intercept…”
- Banks v. Opat (District Court, D. Kansas 2021)“…ete defense against any civil action. 18 U.S.C. § 2520(d); K.S.A. § 22-2518(2). “To be in good faith, the officers’…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Kansas Landlord-Tenant Recording Laws, Kansas Security Camera Laws, Kansas Video Recording Laws
§ 22-2515Authorized interception of wire, oral or electronic communications; order; application; crimes for which order may be issued; disclosure and use of contents of wire, oral or electronic communications; effect on privileged communications.In force
(a) An ex parte order authorizing the interception of a wire, oral or electronic communication may be issued by a judge of competent jurisdiction. The attorney general, district attorney or county attorney may make an application to any judge of competent jurisdiction for an order authorizing the interception of a wire, oral or electronic communication by an investigative or law enforcement officer and agency having responsibility for the investigation of the offense regarding which the application is made, when such interception may provide evidence of the commission of any of the following offenses: (1) Any crime directly and immediately affecting the safety of a human life which is a felony; (2) murder; (3) kidnapping; (4) treason; (5) sedition; (6) racketeering; (7) commercial bribery; (8) robbery; (9) theft, if the offense would constitute a felony; (10) bribery; (11) any felony violation of K.S.A.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ksrevisor.gov
Cited in 8 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2012
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Roudybush (Supreme Court of Kansas 1984, 235 Kan. 834)“…umstances justifying such expectation.” K.S.A. 22-2515 requires an ex parte court order to int…”
- State v. Bruce (Supreme Court of Kansas 2012, 295 Kan. 1036)“…ption of wire, oral or electronic communication pursuant to K.S.A. 22-2515, et seq. to Barry Disney, Assistant Att…”
- State v. Kuchinsky (Court of Appeals of Kansas 1979, 3 Kan. App. 2d 224)“…ress on the ground that the State had failed to comply with K.S.A. 22-2515(6). The State filed this interlocutory…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Kansas Statutes Annotated, Chapter 58: PERSONAL AND REAL PROPERTY
§ 58-4601Citation and purpose of act; findings of the legislature.In force
(a) K.S.A. 58-4601 through 58-4614 and 58-4616 through 58-4623, and amendments thereto, shall be known as the Kansas uniform common interest owners bill of rights act. (b) The legislature finds as a matter of public policy: (1) That a significant and increasing number of Kansans live in common interest communities; (2) that effective operation of these common interest communities is in the interest of their owners, residents, and the state; and (3) that the adoption of uniform rules to govern the rights and duties of unit owners, associations, and developers will help to ensure that common interest communities operate effectively and fairly. (c) The public purposes of this act are to establish uniform rules of law to clarify the rights and duties of unit owners and associations in all forms of common interest communities, to provide for the effective operation of common interest communities in the interest of their owners and their residents and to address current and potential areas of conflict and tension between unit owners and associations, boards and managers in a comprehensive and balanced manner. (d) This section shall take effect on and after January 1, 2011.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ksrevisor.gov
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- K.S.A. 21-6101 - Breach of Privacy(ksrevisor.gov).gov
- K.S.A. 22-2515 - Authorized Interception of Communications(ksrevisor.gov).gov
- K.S.A. 22-2518 - Civil Damages for Unlawful Interception(ksrevisor.gov).gov
- K.S.A. 21-6611 - Felony Fines(ksrevisor.gov).gov
- K.S.A. 21-6602 - Misdemeanor Sentencing(ksrevisor.gov).gov
- Kansas Sentencing Commission - Sentencing Guidelines(sentencing.ks.gov).gov
- K.S.A. 58-4601 - Kansas Uniform Common Interest Owners Bill of Rights Act(ksrevisor.gov).gov
- K.S.A. 21-6804 - Sentencing grid for nondrug crimes; presumptive disposition(ksrevisor.gov)
- K.S.A. 58-4605 - Application of the Kansas uniform common interest owners bill of rights act (12 or more residential units)(ksrevisor.gov)
- K.S.A. 58-4608 - Association duties; power to adopt and amend rules(ksrevisor.gov)
- K.S.A. 58-4617 - Rules; construction, design and aesthetic standards if the declaration so provides(ksrevisor.gov)