Kansas
Kansas GPS Tracking Laws: Is It Legal to Put a Tracker on a Car? (2026)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 26, 2026). · Law checked current as of August 9, 2026. How we verify our legal content
Kansas does not have a law that makes it a crime simply to attach a GPS tracker to a car. There is no per-se device-placement offense like some neighboring states have.
That does not make secret tracking legal. Since 2023, Kansas treats GPS tracking that puts someone in fear as criminal stalking under K.S.A. 21-5427, and stalking can be charged as a felony. The same bill rewired Kansas protection orders so a judge can now expressly ban electronic tracking.
This guide explains how Kansas law actually treats vehicle trackers, AirTags, and phone-based location monitoring. It is part of our GPS Tracking Laws by State series.
Is It Legal to Put a GPS Tracker on a Car in Kansas?
It depends on whose car it is and why you are tracking it. Kansas never criminalized the act of installing a tracker by itself, so the legal question is whether the tracking adds up to stalking.
Tracking your own vehicle is legal. So is tracking a vehicle with the owner's knowledge and consent, or tracking for a genuinely legitimate business purpose.
Tracking someone else's car without consent is where the risk begins. If the tracking targets a specific person, would make a reasonable person fear for their safety, and actually puts that person in fear, it fits the definition of stalking under K.S.A. 21-5427. That is true whether the tool is a hardwired GPS unit, a battery tracker under the bumper, an AirTag in a seat pocket, or a location-sharing app on a phone.
There is also a civil side. Kansas recognizes the privacy tort of intrusion upon seclusion, so a person who is secretly tracked may be able to sue for damages even if no criminal charge is ever filed.
Kansas Added GPS Tracking to Its Stalking Law in 2023 (K.S.A. 21-5427 and SB 217)
Before 2023, Kansas prosecutors had to squeeze GPS tracking into general stalking language about following or surveilling a person. Senate Bill 217, passed in 2023, fixed that by writing tracking technology directly into the statute.
K.S.A. 21-5427 defines stalking as a course of conduct targeted at a specific person. SB 217 added a new prong to the list of qualifying acts: utilizing any electronic tracking system, or acquiring tracking information, to determine the targeted person's location, movement, or travel patterns.
Two things are worth noticing in that language. First, it covers more than planting a device. Acquiring tracking information is enough, which reaches someone who logs into a shared account, abuses a family location app, or pulls location data from a car's connected services.
Second, fear is still central. Stalking under (a)(1) requires recklessly placing the person in actual fear for their safety, and under (a)(2) it requires acting with knowledge that the course of conduct will place the person in fear. Tracking that the target never learns about can still matter as evidence, but the crime is built around the fear it creates.
The statute has built-in limits. Constitutionally protected activity does not count, and neither does conduct that was necessary to accomplish a legitimate purpose independent of making contact with the targeted person. That is the lane that protects fleet tracking, repossession agents working within the law, and arguably a parent monitoring a minor child.
One commercial scenario comes up often: lenders and buy-here-pay-here dealers sometimes install trackers in vehicles they finance. Kansas has no statute that specifically requires disclosure of these devices, but they are routinely disclosed in the financing paperwork, and a tracker you agreed to in writing is not secret surveillance.
Who Can Legally Track a Vehicle in Kansas
Because the crime is stalking rather than device placement, legality turns on ownership, consent, and purpose.
![]()
Your own vehicle. You can track a car titled to you. That includes a car you let someone else drive, although tracking an estranged partner through a car you technically own can still become stalking if it is part of a fear-inducing campaign.
Co-owned vehicles. A spouse who is on the title has an ownership interest in the vehicle. But co-ownership is not a magic shield in Kansas. If the tracking is used to follow and intimidate the other spouse, especially during a separation or divorce, it can still satisfy the stalking statute, and a judge can ban it by court order.
Parents of minors. Kansas has no statute on parental tracking, but monitoring your own minor child's location is the classic example of conduct with a legitimate purpose, and it is widely treated as lawful.
Businesses and fleets. Employers and fleet operators can track vehicles the company owns. That is a legitimate business purpose far removed from any intent to frighten a targeted person.
Lenders and dealers. Kansas has no statute that specifically regulates lender trackers in financed vehicles. They are typically disclosed in the contract you sign, and a disclosed tracker used to protect collateral serves a legitimate purpose far removed from stalking.
Police. Law enforcement is a separate track entirely. Under United States v. Jones, 565 U.S. 400 (2012), attaching a GPS device to a vehicle and monitoring its movements is a Fourth Amendment search, so police generally need a warrant.
Can My Employer Track My Car in Kansas?
Kansas has no statute regulating employer GPS tracking, so the default rules apply.
If you drive a company vehicle, assume it can be tracked. The employer owns the vehicle, and monitoring company assets is a legitimate business purpose. Most fleet policies disclose the tracking, but Kansas does not require employee consent for company-owned vehicles.
Your personal vehicle is different. An employer who hides a tracker on a car you own, without your consent, has no ownership interest to stand on. If the monitoring becomes targeted and intimidating, it can cross into stalking territory, and secret tracking of a personal vehicle is exactly the kind of conduct an intrusion upon seclusion lawsuit is built for.
The practical middle ground is consent. Employers who need to track personal vehicles used for work, for example for mileage or delivery routing, typically do it through an app the employee installs and agrees to. Workplace monitoring questions often overlap with audio and video rules, which we cover in our Kansas recording laws guide.
AirTags and Item Trackers in Kansas
K.S.A. 21-5427 is technology-neutral. The phrase any electronic tracking system covers an AirTag, Tile, Samsung SmartTag, or GPS logger just as easily as a professional tracker.
Dropping an AirTag into someone's bag or magnet-mounting a tracker under their car, then using it to follow their movements, fits the tracking prong added by SB 217. If the target discovers it and is placed in fear, the elements of stalking line up quickly, and courts take hidden trackers seriously precisely because people who find them tend to be terrified.
Apple, Google, and Samsung all push unknown-tracker alerts to nearby phones. Treat one of those alerts as a real warning, not a glitch, and see the steps below if a search turns up a device.
Penalties for GPS Tracking as Stalking in Kansas
Stalking is graded by intent, repeat offenses, and who the victim is. Kansas misdemeanors carry up to 12 months in county jail and a fine of up to $2,500. Felony sentences come off the Kansas sentencing grid and depend on criminal history.
![]()
| Conduct | First conviction | Repeat conviction |
|---|---|---|
| Stalking by recklessly placing the person in fear, K.S.A. 21-5427(a)(1) | Class A person misdemeanor | Severity level 7 person felony |
| Stalking with knowledge it will place the person in fear, K.S.A. 21-5427(a)(2) | Class A person misdemeanor | Severity level 5 person felony |
| Stalking in violation of a protection order, K.S.A. 21-5427(a)(3) | Severity level 9 person felony | Severity level 5 person felony |
| Stalking a child under 14 | Severity level 7 person felony | Severity level 4 person felony |
Federal law can stack on top. 18 U.S.C. 2261A makes it a federal crime to use an electronic communication service or electronic system, including GPS monitoring, to stalk someone across state lines, with penalties starting at up to five years in federal prison.
Protection Orders Can Now Ban Electronic Tracking
SB 217 did more than amend the criminal statute. It updated four civil statutes so Kansas courts can put tracking bans in writing.
Divorce and family court restraining orders under K.S.A. 23-2224 and 23-2707, protection from abuse orders under K.S.A. 60-3107, and protection from stalking orders under K.S.A. 60-31a06 can all now expressly prohibit a person from using an electronic tracking system or acquiring tracking information about the protected person.
The same bill strengthened duration. Protection orders now run one to two years initially, and courts can extend them, in qualifying cases up to the lifetime of the defendant.
The combination has teeth. Once an order prohibits tracking, further GPS monitoring that violates the order and places the protected person in fear is stalking in violation of a protection order, a severity level 9 person felony on the first offense with no misdemeanor step. If you need an order, our Kansas restraining order guide walks through PFA and PFS petitions.
What to Do If You Find a Tracker on Your Car
Stay calm and think about safety first, especially if you suspect a specific person planted it.
- Do not destroy it. The device is evidence, and its registration data can identify who placed it.
- Photograph it in place. Capture where it was mounted before anyone moves it.
- Call local police or the sheriff. Report it as suspected stalking under K.S.A. 21-5427 and ask for a report number.
- Save every related event. Unknown-tracker alerts, texts showing someone knew your location, and showing-up incidents all help prove a course of conduct and fear.
- Consider a protection order. A PFS or PFA order can expressly ban tracking and turn any repeat into a felony.
- Get a professional sweep if needed. A mechanic can check wheel wells, bumpers, the OBD port, and under-seat wiring.
If the tracking comes with cameras or other monitoring at home, our guide to security camera rules in Kansas covers that side.
If you are in immediate danger, call 911. The National Domestic Violence Hotline is available at 800-799-7233.
![]()
Sources
Primary sources for this guide, including the Kansas stalking statute and the 2023 session law that added electronic tracking, are listed below.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Laws change and their application depends on specific facts. If you are facing a GPS tracking or stalking issue in Kansas, consult a licensed Kansas attorney. If you are in danger, call 911 or the National Domestic Violence Hotline at 800-799-7233.
More Kansas Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Is it illegal to put a GPS tracker on someone's car in Kansas?
There is no Kansas crime for the act of placing the device alone. But using the tracker to determine the person's location, movements, or travel patterns becomes stalking under K.S.A. 21-5427 when the conduct targets a specific person and places them in fear for their safety. The placement itself is also strong evidence in a stalking case and can support a civil privacy lawsuit.
Can I put a GPS tracker on my spouse's car in Kansas?
If the car is titled in your name or jointly titled, you have an ownership argument, but it is not absolute protection. Tracking used to follow and intimidate a spouse, especially during separation or divorce, can still be charged as stalking, and Kansas family courts can issue restraining orders under K.S.A. 23-2224 that expressly prohibit electronic tracking.
Can a parent track their child in Kansas?
Yes, in practice. Kansas has no statute restricting parental tracking, and monitoring your own minor child fits the stalking statute's exception for conduct with a legitimate purpose. Tracking an adult child, or a minor you do not have custody of, is a different and riskier situation.
Can my employer put a GPS tracker on my car?
On a company-owned vehicle, yes, and no Kansas statute requires your consent. On your personal vehicle, an employer should get your written consent. Hidden tracking of an employee's own car has no ownership justification and invites both stalking exposure and an invasion of privacy lawsuit.
Can police GPS-track my car without a warrant in Kansas?
Generally no. In United States v. Jones (2012), the U.S. Supreme Court held that attaching a GPS device to a vehicle and monitoring its movements is a Fourth Amendment search, so law enforcement normally needs a warrant supported by probable cause.
Is using an AirTag to track someone a crime in Kansas?
It can be. K.S.A. 21-5427 covers any electronic tracking system, which includes AirTags, Tiles, and similar item trackers. Using one to learn a targeted person's location or travel patterns, in a way that places them in fear, satisfies the tracking prong that SB 217 added in 2023.
What if the tracking crosses state lines?
Federal law may apply. 18 U.S.C. 2261A, the federal stalking statute, criminalizes using any electronic system, including GPS, to stalk or surveil someone with intent to harass or intimidate when interstate elements are present. Federal penalties start at up to five years in prison.
Can I sue someone who tracked my car in Kansas?
Possibly. Kansas recognizes the tort of intrusion upon seclusion, and secret location tracking of your vehicle is the kind of highly offensive intrusion that tort targets. A civil claim can proceed whether or not prosecutors file stalking charges. Talk to a Kansas civil attorney about your facts.
Updates
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Kansas Statutes Annotated, Chapter 21: CRIMES AND PUNISHMENTS
§ 21-5427Stalking.In forcecited in 5 of our articles
(a) Stalking is: (1) Recklessly engaging in a course of conduct targeted at a specific person which would cause a reasonable person in the circumstances of the targeted person to fear for such person's safety, or the safety of a member of such person's immediate family and the targeted person is actually placed in such fear; (2) engaging in a course of conduct targeted at a specific person with knowledge that the course of conduct will place the targeted person in fear for such person's safety or the safety of a member of such person's immediate family; (3) after being served with, or otherwise provided notice of, any protective order included in K.S.A. 21-3843, prior to its repeal or K.S.A.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ksrevisor.gov
Cited in 12 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Kansas courts have construed K.S.A. 21-5427. State v. Loganbill (2022) held reckless stalking requires the targeted person's subjective and objectively reasonable fear, and secretly photographing or filming someone repeatedly may be a course of conduct. State v. Harrington (2026) affirmed a stalking conviction for covert GPS tracking.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Loganbill (Court of Appeals of Kansas 2022)✓A fourth grade teacher secretly photographed and filmed a ten year old student's buttocks all school year; the court affirmed the reckless stalking conviction, holding such repeated secret filming can be a course of conduct and that the child's fear may arise after it ends.
- State v. Colwell (Court of Appeals of Kansas 2025)✓Days after a protection from stalking order issued, Colwell sent unsigned flowers to J.M. and called her from an unknown number; the court held the officer's return of service satisfied the disputed notice element of K.S.A. 21-5427(a)(3) and affirmed the stalking conviction.
- State v. Hernandez (Court of Appeals of Kansas 2019)✓Hernandez pleaded no contest to misdemeanor stalking on a complaint citing K.S.A. 21-5427 without naming a subsection; the court refused to let him withdraw the plea but remanded for findings fixing the subsection, because it changes the level of any second offense.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Kansas Laws on Recording in Public, Kansas Employee Monitoring Laws (2026): Workplace Surveillance Rights, GPS Tracking Laws by State: Is It Legal to Put a Tracker on a Car? (2026)
Kansas Statutes Annotated, Chapter 60: PROCEDURE, CIVIL
§ 60-3107Protection from abuse orders; procedure; modification of orders; inconsistent orders; limitations on time of extension of orders; violation of orders; criminal violations and penalties.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
(a) The court may approve any consent agreement to bring about a cessation of abuse of the plaintiff or minor children or grant any of the following orders: (1) Restraining the defendant from abusing, molesting or interfering with the privacy or rights of the plaintiff or of any minor children of the parties, including, but not limited to, utilizing any electronic tracking system or acquiring tracking information to determine the other person's location, movement or travel patterns. Such order shall contain a statement that if such order is violated, such violation may constitute assault as defined in K.S.A. 21-5412(a), and amendments thereto, battery as defined in K.S.A. 21-5413(a), and amendments thereto, domestic battery as defined in K.S.A. 21-5414, and amendments thereto, and violation of a protective order as defined in K.S.A. 21-5924, and amendments thereto. (2) Granting possession of the residence or household to the plaintiff to the exclusion of the defendant, and further restraining the defendant from entering or remaining upon or in such residence or household, subject to the limitation of subsection (d).
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-08 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ksrevisor.gov
Cited in 13 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Barnett v. Barnett (Court of Appeals of Kansas 1997, 24 Kan. App. 2d 342)“…es because the underlying order was erroneous. We disagree. K.S.A. 60-3107(a)(7), which allows the trial court to…”
- In re Spradling (Supreme Court of Kansas 2022, 509 P.3d 483)“…n active order was in place at the time of the murders. But K.S.A. 60-3107(e) provides that "a protective order .…”
- Key v. Hein, Ebert & Weir, Chtd. (Supreme Court of Kansas 1998, 265 Kan. 124)“…ight have been arrested for were misdemeanors. At that time K.S.A. 60-3107(g), the relevant provision of the Prote…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Kansas Restraining Order Laws (2026): How to Get a Protective Order
Kansas Statutes Annotated, Chapter 23: KANSAS FAMILY LAW CODE-REVISED
§ 23-2224Court orders; interlocutory orders; ex parte, when; notice and hearing; temporary support.In force
(a) The court, without requiring bond, may make and enforce orders that: (1) Restrain the parties from molesting or interfering with the privacy or rights of each other, including, but not limited to, utilizing any electronic tracking system or acquiring tracking information to determine the other person's location, movement or travel patterns; (2) confirm the existing de facto custody of the child subject to further order of the court, if the court has jurisdiction under K.S.A. 23-37,101 et seq., and amendments thereto; (3) appoint an expert to conduct genetic tests for determination of paternity as provided in K.S.A. 23-2212, and amendments thereto; (4) order the mother and child and alleged father to contact the court appointed expert and provide tissue samples for testing within 30 days after service of the order; (5) order the payment of temporary child support pursuant to subsection (c); or (6) the court deems appropriate under the provisions of article 22 of chapter 23 of the Kansas Statutes Annotated, and amendments thereto.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ksrevisor.gov
United States Code Title 18
§ 2261AStalkingIn forcecited in 53 of our articles
Whoever— travels in interstate or foreign commerce or is present within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, or enters or leaves Indian country, with the intent to kill, injure, harass, intimidate, or place under surveillance with intent to kill, injure, harass, or intimidate another person, and in the course of, or as a result of, such travel or presence engages in conduct that— places that person in reasonable fear of the death of, or serious bodily injury to— that person; an immediate family member (as defined in section 115) of that person; a spouse or intimate partner of that person; or the pet, service animal, emotional support animal, or horse of that person; or causes, attempts to cause, or would be reasonably expected to cause substantial emotional distress to a person described in clause (i), (ii), or (iii) of subparagraph (A); or with the intent to kill, injure, harass, intimidate, or place under surveillance with intent to kill, injure, harass, or intimidate another person, uses the mail, any interactive computer service or electronic communication service or electronic communication system of interstate commerce, or any other…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 350 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Federal appeals courts have construed and upheld Section 2261A. United States v. Walker (2011) read in the course of, or as a result of such travel disjunctively, so pre-travel threats plus resulting fear sufficed. United States v. Amy Gonzalez (2018) held it neither overbroad nor vague and no First Amendment violation as applied.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- United States v. Walker (Court of Appeals for the First Circuit 2011, 665 F.3d 212)✓After emailing threats to his estranged wife, the defendant flew from Michigan to Puerto Rico and was arrested on arrival. The court read the disjunctive phrase in 2261A(1) to cover travel that itself places the target in reasonable fear, and upheld the stalking conviction.
- United States v. Amy Gonzalez (Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2018, 905 F.3d 165)✓Relatives waged a years-long campaign against a mother that ended in a courthouse shooting. The court held 2261A is neither overbroad nor vague because it reaches harassing conduct, and that the mental states it lists are alternative means, not elements; convictions affirmed.
- United States v. Wills (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit 2003, 346 F.3d 476)✓A burglary suspect pursued the witness who identified him at a preliminary hearing; the witness later died. The court held the evidence met each element of 2261A: travel from D.C. to Virginia, intent to harm or harass, and reasonable fear of death; conviction affirmed.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Alabama GPS Tracking Laws: Is It Legal to Put a Tracker on a Car? (2026), Colorado GPS Tracking Laws: Is It Legal to Put a Tracker on a Car? (2026), Florida GPS Tracking Laws: Is It Legal to Put a Tracker on a Car? (2026)
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- K.S.A. 21-5427, Kansas stalking statute (Kansas Office of Revisor of Statutes)(ksrevisor.gov)
- Kansas Senate Bill 217 (2023), adding electronic tracking to K.S.A. 21-5427 and amending protection order statutes(kslegislature.gov)
- K.S.A. 60-3107, Protection from Abuse Act, relief and order provisions(ksrevisor.gov)
- United States v. Jones, 565 U.S. 400 (2012), slip opinion(supremecourt.gov)
- 18 U.S.C. 2261A, federal stalking statute(law.cornell.edu)