EnglishEspañol
Idaho flag

Idaho

Idaho Laws on Recording Police: Your Rights and Limitations (2026)

Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 15, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 9, 2026. · 6 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Idaho Laws on Recording Police: Your Rights and Limitations (2026)

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I record police officers in Idaho?

Yes. The First Amendment protects your right to record law enforcement officers performing their duties in public. Idaho's one-party consent law (Idaho Code 18-6702) also allows you to record conversations you participate in with officers. You must not interfere with police operations or trespass while recording.

Can a police officer tell me to stop recording in Idaho?

An officer can ask you to move back for safety reasons, but cannot legally order you to stop recording in a public place where you have a right to be. If you are not interfering with police operations, an order to stop recording or delete footage may violate your First Amendment rights. Stay calm, assert your rights politely, and address any violations through legal channels afterward.

Do Idaho police officers wear body cameras?

Idaho does not have a statewide body camera mandate. Individual law enforcement agencies decide whether to adopt body camera programs. Some departments, including the Boise Police Department, have implemented body cameras. Policies on activation, storage, and public release of footage vary by department.

Can I record inside an Idaho courtroom?

Recording in Idaho courtrooms requires advance approval from the presiding judge under Idaho Court Administrative Rule 45. Media outlets must submit a written request. Recording of attorney-client communications, bench conferences, jury deliberations, and closed proceedings is prohibited.

What should I do if a police officer confiscates my phone or deletes my footage in Idaho?

Do not physically resist. Note the officer's name, badge number, and department. File a complaint with the department's internal affairs division, the Idaho POST Council, or the ACLU of Idaho. You may also have a federal civil rights claim under 42 U.S.C. 1983 for violation of your First Amendment rights, which can result in damages and attorney fees.

Updates

Corrected the description of Askins v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, which was a remanded case about photography at border ports of entry, not a ruling establishing personal liability for officers who stop recording, and replaced two dead-end case citation links with the actual opinions.

Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources

Governing law re-checked for recent changes

Corrected the description of Idaho Code 31-871's body-camera retention tiers: the statute keys retention to whether a recording has evidentiary value and whether the equipment is affixed to a building, not to a 'felony/standard/administrative' classification the statute does not use.

Governing law re-checked for recent changes

Reviewed and approved by an editor

Sources and References

  1. Idaho Code 18-6702 - Interception and Disclosure of Communications(legislature.idaho.gov).gov
  2. Idaho Code 18-705 - Resisting or Obstructing Officers(legislature.idaho.gov).gov
  3. Idaho Code 31-871 - Sheriff Body-Worn Camera Retention(legislature.idaho.gov).gov
  4. Idaho Code 74-101 - Public Records Act(legislature.idaho.gov).gov
  5. Idaho Court Administrative Rule 45 - Cameras in the Courtroom(isc.idaho.gov).gov
  6. Idaho POST Council(post.idaho.gov).gov
  7. Fordyce v. City of Seattle, 55 F.3d 436 (9th Cir. 1995)(courtlistener.com)
  8. Askins v. U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security, 899 F.3d 1035 (9th Cir. 2018)(courtlistener.com)
  9. 42 U.S.C. 1983 - Civil Rights Statute(law.cornell.edu)
  10. 18 U.S.C. 2511 - Federal Wiretap Statute(law.cornell.edu)
Share: