Idaho
Idaho Laws on Recording in Public: Photography, Filming, and Audio Rights (2026)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 15, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 15, 2026. · 8 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Idaho law permits photography, video, and audio recording in public spaces. The First Amendment protects the right to document people and events visible from public areas, and Idaho Code 18-6702 allows one-party consent audio recording of conversations in which you participate, with no permit or prior consent required.
Recording in public spaces in Idaho is broadly protected by the First Amendment and supported by Idaho's one-party consent wiretapping law. Citizens, journalists, tourists, and content creators can photograph, film, and record audio in public areas without needing permission from the people they are recording. However, certain behaviors during public recording can cross into illegal territory.
This page explains Idaho's legal framework for recording in public, including what you can and cannot record, the rules for audio capture, restrictions that apply even in public settings, and how to handle conflicts that arise from public recording.
The Right to Record in Public
Constitutional Foundation
The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution protects the right to gather information through photography and recording in public places. While the U.S. Supreme Court has not issued a single definitive ruling on public recording rights, federal courts across the country have consistently recognized that the First Amendment protects the act of recording matters of public interest in public spaces.
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which has jurisdiction over Idaho, has recognized First Amendment protections for recording in public. In Fordyce v. City of Seattle, 55 F.3d 436 (9th Cir. 1995), the court held that the First Amendment protects recording matters of public interest, including police activity. Idaho residents have strong, controlling federal constitutional protections for public recording activities.
No Idaho Statute Prohibiting Public Recording
Idaho has not enacted any statute that prohibits photography, video recording, or filming in public spaces. There is no permit requirement for personal photography or non-commercial filming on public property. You do not need anyone's permission to record what is visible and audible from a public area.
What Qualifies as a Public Space
Public spaces where recording is freely permitted include:
- Streets, sidewalks, and crosswalks
- Public parks, trails, and recreation areas
- Government building exteriors and grounds
- Public plazas, squares, and gathering areas
- Public parking lots and garages
- Public transportation stops and stations
- Public beaches and waterfront areas
- State and national forests and public lands (subject to land management rules)
Audio Recording in Public

Idaho's One-Party Consent Rule
While video and photography in public are essentially unrestricted, audio recording has specific legal parameters under Idaho Code 18-6702.
Recording conversations you participate in. As a party to a conversation in public, you can record it without informing the other person. This covers conversations at parks, on sidewalks, at outdoor events, or anywhere in public.
Recording conversations you are not part of. Idaho Code 18-6701 defines "oral communication" as any spoken communication where the speaker has a "reasonable expectation" that it is not being intercepted. In public spaces, the expectation of privacy for conversations is generally diminished. A conversation held at normal volume in a crowded park, on a public sidewalk, or at an outdoor cafe is typically not protected because the speakers could reasonably expect to be overheard.
However, a whispered conversation in a quiet corner of a public library or a private discussion in a secluded area of a park might carry a higher privacy expectation, even though the location is technically public.
The Reasonable Expectation Test
Idaho courts evaluate whether a speaker had a reasonable expectation of privacy based on the totality of the circumstances:
- Volume of the conversation. Loud conversations carry less privacy expectation than whispered ones.
- Location specifics. A conversation in the middle of a busy sidewalk has less privacy expectation than one in a secluded park bench.
- Number of people nearby. More bystanders reduce the reasonable expectation of privacy.
- Visible efforts to keep the conversation private. Deliberate attempts to speak privately (turning away, lowering voice, moving to an isolated area) suggest a higher privacy expectation.
- Context of the conversation. Business discussions in a public restaurant may carry different expectations than casual chatter on a street corner.
Recording Government Activities in Public

Open Public Meetings
Idaho's Open Meeting Law, Idaho Code 74-201, establishes that the formation of public policy is public business and cannot be conducted in secret. All meetings of governing bodies of public agencies must be open to the public.
The public's right to attend these meetings includes the practical right to record what occurs. You can video record, audio record, photograph, and livestream:
- City council meetings
- County commission meetings
- School board meetings
- State legislative sessions and committee hearings
- Public hearings on zoning, permits, and policy
- Meetings of state boards and commissions
- Town hall meetings and public forums
Individual agencies may establish reasonable rules about equipment placement (tripod locations, not blocking exits or aisles), but they cannot prohibit recording altogether.
Recording Public Officials and Government Employees
You can record public officials and government employees performing their duties in public. This includes:
- Police officers (see Idaho laws on recording police for detailed guidance)
- City and county officials at public events
- Code enforcement officers during inspections
- Building inspectors during public-facing activities
- Public school administrators at public events
- Any government employee performing duties in a public setting
The First Amendment protects this recording as a form of government accountability. Officials cannot order you to stop recording simply because they dislike being filmed.
Restrictions on Public Recording

While public recording is broadly legal, several Idaho statutes create boundaries around how recording can be conducted.
Stalking and Harassment
Repeatedly following and filming the same individual against their wishes, even in public, could constitute stalking under Idaho law. The base offense, stalking in the second degree under Idaho Code 18-7906, covers a course of conduct that seriously alarms, annoys, or harasses the victim and would cause a reasonable person substantial emotional distress, or that would cause a reasonable person to fear death or physical injury. If an aggravating factor is present, such as a violation of a protective order, a victim under 16, or use of a deadly weapon, the conduct can instead be charged as stalking in the first degree under Idaho Code 18-7905.
Key elements that distinguish legal public recording from stalking:
- Pattern of behavior. A single instance of filming someone in public is not stalking. A repeated pattern of following and filming the same person may be.
- Reasonable fear. The conduct must be such that a reasonable person would feel fear or harassment.
- Directed at a specific person. General public recording is different from targeted, repeated filming of one individual.
Obstruction
Idaho Code 18-705 makes it a misdemeanor to willfully resist, delay, or obstruct any public officer in the discharge of their duties. Recording in public is legal, but recording in a way that physically interferes with police operations, emergency response, or other government functions can lead to obstruction charges.
Trespassing
Idaho Code 18-7008 prohibits entering or remaining on private property without permission. You cannot trespass on private property to get a better angle for public recording. Your right to record extends only to areas where you have a legal right to be.
Voyeurism in Public Settings
Even in public, Idaho Code 18-6605 prohibits using cameras to capture images of a person's intimate areas without their consent. "Upskirting," "downblousing," and similar conduct is illegal regardless of whether it occurs in a public place.
Recording on Private Property Open to the Public
Many spaces that feel public are actually private property with public access. Businesses, shopping malls, restaurants, movie theaters, and private event venues are private property even though the public is invited in.
Private Property Rules
On private property, the property owner sets the recording rules:
- A store can prohibit photography or filming inside its establishment
- A restaurant can ask you to stop recording other diners
- A mall can restrict filming in common areas
- A private event venue can ban cameras and recording devices
If you are asked to stop recording on private property and refuse, the property owner can ask you to leave. Remaining after being asked to leave constitutes trespass under Idaho law.
Common Areas of Public Buildings
Government buildings, libraries, courthouses, and public schools occupy an intermediate space. The building is public property, but certain areas may have restricted access or recording rules:
- Public lobbies and corridors are generally open to recording
- Courtrooms require judicial approval under ICAR 45
- Secure areas may prohibit recording for safety reasons
- Schools have additional protections related to student privacy (see Idaho school recording laws)
Street Photography and Content Creation
Legal Status of Street Photography
Street photography is legal in Idaho. Photographers and videographers can capture images of people, buildings, events, and scenes visible from public spaces without obtaining consent from the individuals depicted. This is a well-established principle in First Amendment law.
Commercial Use Considerations
While capturing images in public is legal, using identifiable images of people for commercial purposes (advertising, product promotion, endorsements) without their consent may give rise to common law claims for misappropriation of likeness. Idaho does not have a comprehensive right-of-publicity statute, but common law principles protect individuals from unauthorized commercial use of their identity.
Editorial and news use of publicly captured images is protected by the First Amendment. Newspapers, news websites, documentaries, and educational materials can use images taken in public without consent.
Artistic expression is also generally protected. Fine art photography, gallery exhibitions, and artistic projects featuring images captured in public are typically covered by First Amendment protections.
Drone Recording in Public
Drones operated in public airspace are subject to FAA regulations under 14 CFR Part 107 and Idaho's drone statute (Idaho Code 21-213). While drones can record in public airspace, they cannot be used to intentionally surveil people on private property without consent.
Recording at Public Events
Protests and Demonstrations
Recording at protests and public demonstrations is protected by the First Amendment. Both participants and bystanders can document events, police presence, and any interactions that occur.
Key guidelines:
- You can record from any public vantage point
- Police cannot order you to stop recording if you are not interfering with operations
- If an unlawful assembly is declared, follow dispersal orders while continuing to record
- Livestreaming provides additional protection since footage is immediately uploaded
Sporting Events and Concerts
Recording policies at public events vary by venue and organizer. While outdoor events on public property are generally open to recording, event organizers may restrict recording through ticket conditions:
- Many concert venues prohibit professional recording equipment
- Sporting events may restrict commercial photography
- Ticket purchase may include consent to venue recording policies
These restrictions are contractual rather than statutory. Violating them could result in ejection from the event but generally not criminal charges.
Parades and Public Celebrations
Recording public parades, festivals, and celebrations is legal. Participants in public events have minimal privacy expectations regarding being photographed or filmed.
Handling Confrontations About Public Recording
When Someone Objects to Being Recorded
If someone confronts you about recording in public:
- Stay calm and polite. De-escalation is always the best approach.
- Know your rights. You are not required to stop recording in a public space.
- Explain if appropriate. A brief explanation can defuse many situations: "I am recording in a public space, which is my legal right."
- Do not engage in arguments. If the person becomes aggressive, create distance.
- Do not delete footage. You have no legal obligation to delete recordings made in public.
- Call law enforcement if threatened. If someone physically threatens you for recording in public, contact the police.
When Law Enforcement Objects
If a police officer asks you to stop recording, see our detailed guide on recording police in Idaho.
Idaho Recording Law Sub-Topics
Audio Recording | Video Recording | Voyeurism Laws | Workplace Recording | Recording Police | Phone Call Recording | Security Cameras | Recording in Public | Landlord-Tenant | Dashcam Laws | School Recording | Medical Recording
More Idaho Recording Topics
More Idaho Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Is it legal to record in public in Idaho?
Yes. Idaho has no law prohibiting photography, video recording, or filming in public spaces. The First Amendment protects the right to record in public areas including streets, sidewalks, parks, and public buildings. Audio recording of conversations you participate in is also legal under Idaho Code 18-6702.
Can I record someone in public without their consent in Idaho?
Yes, for video and photography. You do not need consent to photograph or film people in public spaces. For audio, Idaho's one-party consent law applies. You can record conversations you are part of. Conversations between other people in public may also be recorded if the speakers do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy.
Can a business tell me to stop recording on their property in Idaho?
Yes. Even though a business is open to the public, it remains private property. The business owner or manager can prohibit recording and ask you to leave if you refuse. Remaining after being asked to leave could constitute trespass under Idaho Code 18-7008.
Can I record public government meetings in Idaho?
Yes. Idaho's Open Meeting Law (Idaho Code 74-201) requires that all meetings of public agency governing bodies be open to the public. You can record city council meetings, county commission meetings, school board meetings, and other open government proceedings.
Is street photography legal in Idaho?
Yes. Street photography is protected by the First Amendment. You can photograph people, buildings, and events visible from public spaces without consent. Using identifiable images for commercial purposes (advertising, promotions) may require consent, but editorial, news, and artistic uses are generally protected.
Updates
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected which stalking statute governs ordinary repeated filming of one person: the base offense is stalking in the second degree (Idaho Code 18-7906), not the aggravated first-degree offense (Idaho Code 18-7905), which requires an additional aggravating factor like a protective-order violation.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Idaho Code
§ 18-6702Interception and disclosure of wire, electronic or oral communications prohibitedIn forcecited in 21 of our articles
18-6702. Interception and disclosure of wire, electronic or oral communications prohibited. (1) Except as otherwise specifically provided in this chapter, any person shall be guilty of a felony and is punishable by imprisonment in the state prison for a term not to exceed five (5) years or by a…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.idaho.gov
Cited in 6 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2019
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Idaho courts have applied section 18-6702 to intercepted phone calls. Hoskins v. Howard (1998) held cordless telephone conversations are protected wire communications, so scanning, recording and disclosing one supported a claim. Chapman v. NYK Line North America (2009) noted 18-6702(2)(d) makes one-party-consent recording lawful.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Hoskins v. Howard (Idaho Supreme Court 1998, 132 Idaho 311)✓A sheriff's deputy used a scanner to record a neighbor's cordless call and passed the tape on; the court held such calls are protected wire communications when part of the call crosses the phone network, so Section 18-6702 reached him, and vacated summary judgment in his favor.
- Chapman v. NYK LINE NORTH AMERICA, INC. (Idaho Supreme Court 2009, 147 Idaho 178)“…rsation with the consent of one party to the conversation. Idaho Code § 18-6702 (2)(d). Of course, an employer could im…”
- Bartnicki v. Vopper (Supreme Court of the United States 2001, 532 U.S. 514)“…16-11-66.1 (1996); Haw. Rev. Stat. § 803-42 (1993); Idaho Code § 18-6702 (1997); Ill. Comp. Stat., ch. 720, § 5…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Idaho Recording Laws (2026): One-Party Consent Rules, Idaho Security Camera Laws: Home, Business, and Surveillance Rules (2026), Idaho Medical Recording Laws: Patient Rights, HIPAA, and One-Party Consent (2026)
§ 18-6605video voyeurismIn forcecited in 13 of our articles
18-6605. video voyeurism. (1) As used in this section: (a) "Broadcast" means the electronic transmittal of a visual image with the intent that it be viewed by a person or persons. (b) "Disseminate" means to make available by any means to any person.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.idaho.gov
Cited in 14 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Gomez-Alas (Idaho Supreme Court 2020, 167 Idaho 857)“…does not constitute an infamous crime against nature under Idaho Code sections 18-6605 and 18-6606; (2) there was…”
- State v. Martinez (Idaho Supreme Court 1986, 111 Idaho 281)“…4 ; Robbery, Idaho Code § 18-6503 ; Crime against nature, Idaho Code § 18-6605 ; Forcible sexual penetration by use of…”
- State v. Cook (Idaho Court of Appeals 2008, 146 Idaho 261)“…is unconstitutional. Id. at 712, 69 P.3d at 132. Idaho Code Section 18-6605, provides: Every pers…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Idaho Workplace Recording Laws: Employee and Employer Rights (2026), Idaho Smart Glasses Recording Laws: One-Party Consent, Idaho Ring Doorbell Laws: What You Need to Know in 2026
§ 18-705Resisting and obstructing officers. Every person who wilfully resists, delays or obstructs any public officer, in the discharge, or attempt to discharge, of any duty of his office or who knowingly gives a false report to any peace officer, when no other punishment is prescribed, is punishable by a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars ($1,000), and imprisonment in the county jail not exceeding oneIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
18-705. Resisting and obstructing officers. Every person who wilfully resists, delays or obstructs any public officer, in the discharge, or attempt to discharge, of any duty of his office or who knowingly gives a false report to any peace officer, when no other punishment is prescribed, is…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-01 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.idaho.gov
Cited in 50 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Bishop (Idaho Supreme Court 2009, 146 Idaho 804)“…lley subjected himself to possible criminal liability under Idaho Code section 18-705, which makes it a crime to “knowingly g…”
- State v. Irvin C. Ray (Idaho Supreme Court 2012, 153 Idaho 564)“…r resisting or obstructing a public officer in violation of Idaho Code section 18-705. 4 When a reasonable person is unsure…”
- Rosenberger v. Kootenai County Sheriff's Department (Idaho Supreme Court 2004, 140 Idaho 853)“…tion for resisting or obstructing officers in violation of Idaho Code § 18-705 . Rosenberger filed suit in district co…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Idaho Laws on Recording Police: Your Rights and Limitations (2026)
§ 18-7905Stalking in the first degreeIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
18-7905. Stalking in the first degree. (1) A person commits the crime of stalking in the first degree if the person violates section 18-7906, Idaho Code, and: (a) The actions constituting the offense are in violation of a temporary restraining order, protection order, no contact order or…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-01 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.idaho.gov
Cited in 19 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Stewart (Idaho Supreme Court 2010, 149 Idaho 383)“…he victim.‖ Idaho Code § 18-7906(2)(a). The felony statute, Idaho Code § 18-7905, requires: (a) that the defendant commi…”
- State v. Jeppesen (Idaho Supreme Court 2002, 138 Idaho 71)“…rwin Jeppesen with the offense of stalking in violation of Idaho Code § 18-7905 . The victim of the alleged stalking wa…”
- State v. Rafael Galvan (Idaho Court of Appeals 2014, 156 Idaho 379)“…f conviction and sentence for stalking in the first degree, Idaho Code § 18-7905, and aggravated assault with a deadly w…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Idaho GPS Tracking Laws: Is It Legal to Put a Tracker on a Car? (2026), Idaho Video Recording Laws: Rules for Filming, Surveillance, and Privacy (2026)
§ 18-7906Stalking in the second degreeIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
18-7906. Stalking in the second degree. (1) A person commits the crime of stalking in the second degree if the person knowingly and maliciously: (a) Engages in a course of conduct that seriously alarms, annoys or harasses the victim and is such as would cause a reasonable person substantial…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-26 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.idaho.gov
Cited in 14 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):State v. Desiree B. Eliasen (2015) held appearing at the victim's home and then following her were two acts of nonconsensual contact under section 18-7906, which lists following or maintaining surveillance, including by electronic means. State v. Stewart (2010) held felony stalking needs acts distinct from a prior 18-7906 conviction.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Stewart (Idaho Supreme Court 2010, 149 Idaho 383)✓A man already convicted of misdemeanor stalking was charged with felony stalking of the same victim; the Idaho Supreme Court held the acts proving the section 18-7906 course of conduct must differ from those underlying the earlier conviction, and vacated the judgment.
- State v. Desiree B. Eliasen (Idaho Supreme Court 2015, 158 Idaho 542)✓A driver waited outside a woman's home and then followed her to a store and toward the police station; the Idaho Supreme Court held that appearing at the residence plus following the victim were at least two nonconsensual contacts forming a course of conduct.
- State v. Smith (Idaho Supreme Court 2025, 569 P.3d 137)✓A man followed a police dispatcher home and weeks later parked near her house taking photographs; the Idaho Supreme Court held those were at least two nonconsensual contacts under the statute, supporting probable cause to arrest for second-degree stalking.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Idaho Employee Monitoring Laws (2026): What Employers Can Track
§ 21-213restrictions on use of unmanned aircraft systems — definition — violation — cause of action and damagesIn forcecited in 4 of our articles
21-213. restrictions on use of unmanned aircraft systems — definition — violation — cause of action and damages. (1) (a) For the purposes of this section, the term "unmanned aircraft system" (UAS) means an unmanned aircraft vehicle, drone, remotely piloted vehicle, remotely piloted aircraft or…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.idaho.gov
Also relied on in: Idaho Drone Laws (2026): Privacy, Police Warrants, and Hunting Rules
§ 74-201Formation of public policy at open meetings. The people of the state of Idaho in creating the instruments of government that serve them, do not yield their sovereignty to the agencies so created. Therefore, the legislature finds and declares that it is the policy of this state that the formation of public policy is public business and shall not be conducted in secretIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
74-201. Formation of public policy at open meetings. The people of the state of Idaho in creating the instruments of government that serve them, do not yield their sovereignty to the agencies so created.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-01 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.idaho.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Labrador v. Idaho State Board of Education (Idaho Supreme Court 2024)“…ntracting.” The Idaho Open Meetings Law, codified in Idaho Code sections 74-201 to 74-208, requires governing bodies of…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Idaho School Recording Laws: Student Privacy, FERPA, and Classroom Rules (2026)
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Idaho Code 18-6702 - Interception and Disclosure of Communications(legislature.idaho.gov).gov
- Idaho Code 74-201 - Open Meeting Law(legislature.idaho.gov).gov
- Idaho Code 18-7905 - Stalking in the First Degree(legislature.idaho.gov).gov
- Idaho Code 18-705 - Resisting or Obstructing Officers(legislature.idaho.gov).gov
- Idaho Code 18-6605 - Video Voyeurism(legislature.idaho.gov).gov
- Idaho Code 21-213 - Unmanned Aircraft Systems(legislature.idaho.gov).gov
- Idaho Court Administrative Rule 45 - Cameras in the Courtroom(isc.idaho.gov).gov
- Fordyce v. City of Seattle, 55 F.3d 436 (9th Cir. 1995)(courtlistener.com)
- Idaho Code 18-7906 - Stalking in the Second Degree(legislature.idaho.gov).gov