Oregon
Oregon Voyeurism and Hidden Camera Laws: Offenses, Penalties, and Protections
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 22, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 22, 2026. · 7 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content
Oregon prohibits visual recording of intimate areas without consent under ORS 163.700 and ORS 163.701. Recording in a private setting is a Class A misdemeanor; the offense rises to a Class C felony if the recording captures a full state of nudity or the person recording has a prior conviction for invasion of privacy, indecency, or a sex crime.
Oregon has strong laws against voyeurism and hidden cameras. The state's invasion of personal privacy statutes, ORS 163.700 and ORS 163.701, specifically target visual recording in private settings and of intimate areas without consent. These statutes operate independently from Oregon's wiretapping law under ORS 165.540, creating multiple layers of protection against invasive recording.
This guide covers Oregon's voyeurism and hidden camera laws in 2026, including what conduct is illegal, the penalties for violations, how these laws interact with other recording statutes, and what protections are available for victims.
Oregon's Invasion of Personal Privacy Statutes
ORS 163.700: Second Degree (Class A Misdemeanor)
ORS 163.700 makes it a Class A misdemeanor for a person to knowingly make or record a photograph, motion picture, videotape, or other visual recording of another person in a state of nudity or depicting the intimate area of another person, without the consent of the person being recorded, in a setting where the person has a reasonable expectation of privacy.
The statute covers several specific scenarios:
Recording in private areas. Placing a camera in a bathroom, dressing room, locker room, tanning booth, or similar private space to record a person without consent.
Recording under or through clothing. Using a camera to record under a person's clothing (commonly called "upskirting" or "downblousing") to capture images of intimate areas.
Recording through barriers. Using a camera to record a person on the other side of a wall, door, window, or other barrier where the person has a reasonable expectation of privacy.
ORS 163.701: First Degree (Class C Felony)
ORS 163.701 elevates invasion of personal privacy to a Class C felony when:
- The recording captures the other person in a full state of nudity, made without consent in a place where the person has a reasonable expectation of privacy
- The person recording has a prior conviction for invasion of personal privacy, public indecency, private indecency, or a sex crime (or an equivalent offense in another jurisdiction)
Disseminating recorded images is a separate offense in Oregon under ORS 163.472 (unlawful dissemination of an intimate image), discussed below. Dissemination is not, by itself, an element that elevates a 163.700 recording to first-degree invasion of personal privacy.
What "Intimate Area" Means
Oregon law defines "intimate area" as nudity, or undergarments being worn by a person that are covered by clothing. "Nudity" in turn means any uncovered or less-than-opaquely-covered:
- Genitals
- Pubic area
- Female breast below a point immediately above the top of the areola
This definition is broad enough to cover recording that captures these areas through clothing, under clothing, or while a person is in a state of undress.
What "Reasonable Expectation of Privacy" Means
The "reasonable expectation of privacy" standard examines whether a person in the recorded setting would reasonably believe they were not being observed or recorded. Locations with a strong expectation of privacy include:
- Private bathrooms and restrooms (home, workplace, public)
- Dressing rooms in retail stores
- Locker rooms in gyms, schools, and recreation centers
- Hotel rooms and private bedrooms
- Shower and bathing facilities
- Medical examination rooms
- Tanning booths and similar enclosed spaces
- Changing areas at swimming pools and beaches
Public spaces generally do not carry a reasonable expectation of privacy for what is visible to the naked eye. However, recording intimate areas through or under clothing violates ORS 163.700 regardless of the public setting.
Penalties for Voyeurism Offenses
Second Degree (ORS 163.700)
| Penalty | Maximum |
|---|---|
| Classification | Class A misdemeanor |
| Jail time | Up to 364 days |
| Fine | Up to $6,250 |
| Probation | Up to 5 years |
First Degree (ORS 163.701)
| Penalty | Maximum |
|---|---|
| Classification | Class C felony |
| Prison time | Up to 5 years |
| Fine | Up to $125,000 |
| Probation | Up to 5 years post-release |
Sex Offender Registration
Under ORS 163A.005, the court may classify first-degree invasion of personal privacy as a sex crime. If classified as a sex crime, the convicted person must register as a sex offender, which carries:
- Mandatory registration with the Oregon State Police Sex Offender Registration Unit
- Public listing on the sex offender registry
- Residency restrictions
- Employment limitations
- Ongoing reporting requirements
- Registration period based on classification level
Additional Criminal Charges
Voyeurism conduct may also result in additional charges:
- Stalking under ORS 163.732 if the recording is part of a pattern of unwanted contact
- Harassment under ORS 166.065 if the conduct is intended to harass, annoy, or alarm
- ORS 165.540 violations if the hidden camera also captured audio of in-person conversations
- Child pornography charges under ORS 163.684 if the victim is a minor and the recording is sexually explicit
Common Hidden Camera Scenarios
Hidden Cameras in Bathrooms
Placing a hidden camera in any bathroom is a violation of ORS 163.700. This includes:
- Installing cameras disguised as everyday objects (smoke detectors, electrical outlets, air fresheners)
- Using pinhole cameras concealed in walls or fixtures
- Leaving a phone or recording device in a position to record
- Placing cameras in both residential and commercial bathrooms
The violation applies regardless of whether images were actually captured. The act of knowingly making or recording the visual recording triggers the statute.
Hidden Cameras in Dressing Rooms
Retail fitting rooms and dressing rooms are specifically protected. Hidden cameras in these locations violate ORS 163.700. Retailers and their employees face criminal liability, and victims may pursue civil claims for damages.
Hidden Cameras in Rental Properties
Landlords and property managers who install hidden cameras in rental units face criminal prosecution under ORS 163.700 and potential first-degree charges under ORS 163.701 if the recording captures a full state of nudity or the landlord has a prior conviction for invasion of privacy, indecency, or a sex crime. This includes:
- Cameras hidden in bedrooms or bathrooms of rental units
- Cameras placed in Airbnb or short-term rental properties
- Cameras concealed in smoke detectors, clocks, or other objects
- Any recording device placed where tenants have a reasonable expectation of privacy
Tenants who discover hidden cameras should:
- Do not touch or move the camera
- Document the camera's location with photographs from your own device
- Contact local law enforcement immediately
- Contact the Oregon Department of Justice consumer protection division
- Consult with an attorney about civil remedies
Hidden Cameras in the Workplace
Employers who place cameras in employee bathrooms, changing rooms, or similar private areas violate ORS 163.700. This applies to cameras in:
- Employee restrooms
- Staff changing rooms and locker facilities
- Nursing rooms or lactation spaces
- Any workspace where employees change clothing
Workplace cameras in common areas (halls, lobbies, sales floors) are generally legal for video-only recording.
"Upskirting" and "Downblousing"
Recording under or through a person's clothing to capture images of intimate areas is illegal under ORS 163.700 regardless of the location. This conduct is prohibited in:
- Public transit
- Escalators and stairways
- Stores and shopping areas
- Schools and universities
- Workplaces
- Any location, public or private
Interaction With Oregon's Wiretapping Law
How ORS 165.540 and ORS 163.700 Work Together
Oregon's voyeurism statutes and wiretapping statute are separate laws that can apply simultaneously:
ORS 163.700/701 targets visual recording of intimate areas and private settings. It applies regardless of whether audio is captured.
ORS 165.540 targets audio recording of conversations. It applies when a recording device captures in-person conversations without all-party notification.
A hidden camera that records both video and audio in a private setting could violate both statutes simultaneously, resulting in:
- A Class A misdemeanor under ORS 163.700 for the visual invasion of privacy
- A Class A misdemeanor under ORS 165.540 for the audio recording without notification
- Potential felony charges under ORS 163.701 if the recording captures a full state of nudity or the person recording has a prior conviction for invasion of privacy, indecency, or a sex crime
- Civil liability under both ORS 133.739 (wiretapping) and common law tort claims
The Split Consent Framework Connection
Oregon's split consent framework is primarily relevant to ORS 165.540 (audio), not ORS 163.700 (visual). However, when a hidden camera captures both audio and visual content:
- The audio component requires all-party notification under the in-person rule
- The visual component requires consent when recording intimate areas or in private settings
- Phone calls are not relevant to the voyeurism statute (no visual recording)
Protections for Victims
Criminal Reporting
Victims of voyeurism in Oregon should:
- Report the crime to local law enforcement
- Preserve any evidence, including communications about the recording
- Request a protective order if the perpetrator is known
- Contact the Oregon Crime Victims' Rights Program through the Oregon Department of Justice
Civil Remedies
Victims can pursue civil lawsuits against perpetrators:
- Tort claims: Invasion of privacy, intentional infliction of emotional distress
- ORS 133.739: If audio was captured, civil damages for wiretapping violation
- Statutory damages: Minimum damages under applicable statutes
- Compensatory damages: For emotional distress, therapy costs, and other actual harm
- Punitive damages: To punish egregious conduct
Protective Orders
Oregon courts can issue protective orders under ORS 163.738 (stalking protective orders) when voyeurism conduct constitutes stalking behavior. These orders can prohibit the offender from:
- Contacting the victim
- Coming within a specified distance of the victim
- Possessing the recorded material
- Sharing or disseminating recorded material
Revenge Pornography and Deepfake Laws
If intimate images are shared without consent, Oregon's ORS 163.472 (unlawful dissemination of an intimate image) provides additional protection. This statute makes it a Class A misdemeanor to intentionally disseminate a photograph or video of a person in a state of nudity or engaged in sexual conduct without the person's consent, when the person had a reasonable expectation of privacy.
Oregon amended ORS 163.472 in 2024-2025 to address AI-generated and digitally altered intimate images (deepfakes). The amendments extend the prohibition to synthetic or manipulated images that depict a real person in a state of nudity or engaged in sexual conduct without consent, treating AI deepfakes the same as authentic photographs and videos.
The TAKE IT DOWN Act, signed into federal law on May 19, 2025 (Pub. L. 119-12), adds a federal layer of protection. The law's one-year platform-compliance deadline, May 19, 2026, has already passed, so covered platforms are now required to have a working 48-hour removal process in place. This law makes it a federal crime to publish or threaten to publish intimate visual depictions of a person without consent, including AI-generated deepfake images. It also requires websites and platforms to remove covered content within 48 hours of a victim's request. Oregon victims of NCII have both state remedies under ORS 163.472 and federal remedies under the TAKE IT DOWN Act.
Oregon Recording Laws by Topic
Phone Call Recording | Audio Recording | Video Recording | Workplace Recording | Recording Police | Security Cameras | Recording in Public | Landlord-Tenant | Dashcam Laws | Schools | Medical Recording | Voyeurism & Hidden Cameras
More Oregon Recording Topics
More Oregon Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the penalty for hidden cameras in Oregon?
Placing a hidden camera to record someone in a private setting is invasion of personal privacy in the second degree under ORS 163.700, a Class A misdemeanor with up to 364 days in jail and a $6,250 fine. If the recording captures a full state of nudity, or the person recording has a prior conviction for invasion of privacy, indecency, or a sex crime, it becomes a Class C felony under ORS 163.701 with up to 5 years in prison and a $125,000 fine.
Is upskirting illegal in Oregon?
Yes. Recording under or through a person's clothing to capture images of intimate areas violates ORS 163.700 regardless of whether the recording occurs in a public or private setting. This includes upskirting, downblousing, and any similar recording of intimate areas without consent.
Can I be required to register as a sex offender for voyeurism in Oregon?
Yes. If convicted of first-degree invasion of personal privacy under ORS 163.701, the court may classify the offense as a sex crime under ORS 163A.005. A sex crime classification requires mandatory registration as a sex offender with the Oregon State Police.
What should I do if I find a hidden camera in my rental?
Do not touch or move the camera. Document its location with photographs from your own device. Contact local law enforcement immediately. Then contact the Oregon Department of Justice consumer protection division and consult with an attorney about civil remedies for invasion of privacy.
Does Oregon have a revenge porn law?
Yes. ORS 163.472 makes it a Class A misdemeanor to intentionally disseminate intimate images of a person without their consent when the person had a reasonable expectation of privacy. This applies to photographs and videos showing nudity or sexual conduct.
Updates
Corrected the TAKE IT DOWN Act's signing date to May 19, 2025 (it was misstated as 2026) and noted its platform-compliance deadline has already passed.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected the flagship fabrication of Oregon's first-degree invasion-of-privacy felony triggers (dissemination, victim under 18) to the statute's actual triggers (full state of nudity or a qualifying prior conviction) in six places, and corrected the definition of "intimate area," which does not include buttocks under Oregon law.
Removed a backwards parenthetical comparing ORS 163.701's nudity felony trigger to ORS 163.700's "intimate area" definition. ORS 163.700 defines "intimate area" as nudity OR covered undergarments, so nudity is the narrower category, not a "broader standard."
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Oregon Revised Statutes, Chapter 163: Offenses Against Persons
§ 163.700Invasion of personal privacy in the second degreeIn forcecited in 11 of our articles
(1) Except as provided in ORS 163.702, a person commits the crime of invasion of personal privacy in the second degree if: (a)(A) For the purpose of arousing or gratifying the sexual desire of the person, the person is in a location to observe another person in a state of nudity without the consent of the other person; and (B) The other person is in a place and circumstances where the person has a reasonable expectation of personal privacy; or (b)(A) The person knowingly makes or records a photograph, motion picture, videotape or other visual recording of another person’s intimate area without the consent of the other person; and (B) The person being recorded has a reasonable expectation of privacy concerning the intimate area. (2) As used in this section and ORS 163.701: (a) “Intimate area” means nudity, or undergarments that are being worn by a person and are covered by clothing.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at oregonlegislature.gov
Cited in 16 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2023
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):State v. McQueen (2020) held that a person who intentionally exposes an intimate area to another has no reasonable expectation of privacy as to that person under ORS 163.700(1)(b)(B), reversing a conviction for secretly recording consensual sex. State v. Mayes (2008) read the nudity definition as reaching only post-pubescent people.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Parra-Sanchez (Court of Appeals of Oregon 2023, 324 Or. App. 712)“…wrong, and likely a criminal invasion of her privacy under ORS 163.700. To the extent that our case law regard…”
- State v. Rodriguez-Ganegar (Court of Appeals of Oregon 2003, 186 Or. App. 530)“…hat people were making love in it, the person would violate ORS 163.700(1)(b) by looking into the room in the m…”
- State v. Mayes (Court of Appeals of Oregon 2008, 220 Or. App. 385)✓A man hid cameras in workplace and office restrooms and secretly recorded women and two girls, ages nine and seven. The court held the nudity definition in ORS 163.700 reaches only post-pubescent people, measured from the onset of puberty, and reversed the seven-year-old's count.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Oregon Landlord-Tenant Recording Laws: Surveillance, Privacy, and Consent, Oregon Medical Recording Laws: Patient Rights, HIPAA, and Consent, Oregon School Recording Laws: Student, Parent, and Teacher Rights
§ 163.472Unlawful dissemination of an intimate imageIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
(1) A person commits the crime of unlawful dissemination of an intimate image if: (a) The person, with the intent to harass, humiliate or injure another person, knowingly causes to be disclosed an image of the other person whose intimate parts are visible or who is engaged in sexual conduct; (b) The person knows or reasonably should have known that the other person does not consent to the disclosure; (c) The other person is harassed, humiliated or injured by the disclosure; and (d) A reasonable person would be harassed, humiliated or injured by the disclosure. (2)(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this subsection, unlawful dissemination of an intimate image is a Class A misdemeanor. (b) Unlawful dissemination of an intimate image is a Class C felony if the person has a prior conviction under this section at the time of the offense. (3) As used in this section: (a) “Disclose” includes, but is not limited to, transfer, publish, distribute, exhibit, advertise and offer.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at oregonlegislature.gov
Cited in 6 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):State v. Scott (2025) construed the pre-2019 text, which reached disclosure through an Internet website, to require proof of a World Wide Web page rather than any digital channel, and reversed a conviction where the state showed only that the images went by Facebook Messenger. The 2019 Legislature removed that term.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Scott (Court of Appeals of Oregon 2025, 344 Or. App. 562)✓A man sent intimate images of an ex-girlfriend to her ex-husband through Facebook Messenger; the court construed the 2015 version of ORS 163.472 to reach only disclosures through World Wide Web pages, found the evidence insufficient, and reversed the conviction.
- State v. Davidson (Oregon Supreme Court 2016, 360 Or. 370)“…other, is not a “sex crime” for purposes of ORS 137.719(1). ORS 163.472. Unlawfully being in a location where c…”
- State v. Serrano (A173250) (Court of Appeals of Oregon 2023, 324 Or. App. 453)“…2, attempted unlawful dissemina- tion of an intimate image, ORS 163.472; ORS 161.405. 456…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Oregon Deepfake Laws: AI Images, Voice Cloning & Penalties (2026), Oregon Pornography Laws (2026): State v. Henry & No Obscenity Crime
§ 163.701Invasion of personal privacy in the first degreeIn forcecited in 6 of our articles
(1) Except as provided in ORS 163.702, a person commits the crime of invasion of personal privacy in the first degree if: (a)(A) The person knowingly makes or records a photograph, motion picture, videotape or other visual recording of another person in a state of nudity without the consent of the other person; and (B) At the time the visual recording is made or recorded the person being recorded is in a place and circumstances where the person has a reasonable expectation of personal privacy; or (b) The person violates ORS 163.700 and, at the time of the offense, has a prior conviction for: (A) Invasion of personal privacy in any degree, public indecency, private indecency or a sex crime as defined in ORS 163A.005; or (B) The statutory counterpart of an offense described in subparagraph (A) of this paragraph in another jurisdiction. (2)(a) Invasion of personal privacy in the first degree is a Class C felony. (b) The Oregon Criminal Justice Commission shall classify invasion of personal privacy in the first degree as crime category 6 of the sentencing guidelines grid of the commission.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at oregonlegislature.gov
Cited in 6 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2023
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Parra-Sanchez (Court of Appeals of Oregon 2023, 324 Or. App. 712)“…y, a Class A misdemeanor (ORS 163.700) or Class C fel- ony (ORS 163.701), but intended overt voyeurs to be guil…”
- State v. McQueen (Court of Appeals of Oregon 2020, 307 Or. App. 540)“…acknowl- edges that his conduct was “likely criminal” under ORS 163.701, the statute setting forth the crime of…”
- State v. Murphy (Court of Appeals of Oregon 2022, 319 Or. App. 330)“…was convicted of first-degree invasion of personal privacy, ORS 163.701, based on an incident involving his 15-…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Oregon Recording Laws (2026): Hybrid One-Party and All-Party Rules, Oregon Security Camera Laws: Installation, Audio, and Privacy Rules, Oregon Video Recording Laws: Surveillance, Privacy, and Consent Rules
Oregon Revised Statutes, Chapter 163A: Sex Offender Reporting and Classification
§ 163A.005Definitions for ORS 163A.005 to 163A.235In force
As used in ORS 163A.005 to 163A.235: (1) “Another United States court” means a federal court, a military court, the tribal court of a federally recognized Indian tribe or a court of: (a) A state other than Oregon; (b) The District of Columbia; (c) The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico; (d) Guam; (e) American Samoa; (f) The Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands; or (g) The United States Virgin Islands. (2) “Attends” means is enrolled on a full-time or part-time basis. (3)(a) “Correctional facility” means any place used for the confinement of persons: (A) Charged with or convicted of a crime or otherwise confined under a court order. (B) Found to be within the jurisdiction of the juvenile court for having committed an act that if committed by an adult would constitute a crime. (b) “Correctional facility” applies to a state hospital or a secure intensive community inpatient facility only as to persons detained therein charged with or convicted of a crime, or detained therein after being found guilty except for insanity under ORS 161.290 to 161.373 or responsible except for insanity under ORS 419C.411.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at oregonlegislature.gov
Cited in 25 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Carlton (Oregon Supreme Court 2017)“…section, ‘sex crime’ has the meaning given that term in ORS 163A.005” (Emphasis added.) When defendant c…”
- State v. Davidson (Oregon Supreme Court 2016, 360 Or. 370)“…e as 360 Or 370 (2016) 381 felony sex crimes as defined in ORS 163A.005 twice before being sentenced for the pr…”
- State v. Smith (Court of Appeals of Oregon 2016, 277 Or. App. 709)“…his section, ‘sex crime’ has the meaning given that term in ORS 163A.005.” ORS 163A.005(5), 18 in turn, defin…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Oregon Revised Statutes, Chapter 165: Offenses Involving Fraud or Deception
§ 165.540Obtaining contents of communicationsIn forcecited in 19 of our articles
(1) Except as otherwise provided in ORS 133.724 or 133.726 or subsections (2) to (8) of this section, a person may not: (a) Obtain or attempt to obtain the whole or any part of a telecommunication or a radio communication to which the person is not a participant, by means of any device, contrivance, machine or apparatus, whether electrical, mechanical, manual or otherwise, unless consent is given by at least one participant. (b) Tamper with the wires, connections, boxes, fuses, circuits, lines or any other equipment or facilities of a telecommunication or radio communication company over which messages are transmitted, with the intent to obtain unlawfully the contents of a telecommunication or radio communication to which the person is not a participant. (c) Obtain or attempt to obtain the whole or any part of a conversation by means of any device, contrivance, machine or apparatus, whether electrical, mechanical, manual or otherwise, if not all participants in the conversation are specifically informed that their conversation is being obtained.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at oregonlegislature.gov
Cited in 76 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):State v. Fleetwood (2000) applied ORS 165.540 to body wire evidence, holding that words spoken into a telephone are a telecommunication under subsection (1)(a) and that the (5)(a)(B) exception fails unless the officer or the officer's agent shares reciprocally in the conversation, so the recordings were inadmissible.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Klein (Oregon Supreme Court 2012, 352 Or. 302)“…eing 3 recorded. Conversations recorded in violation of ORS 165.540 are not admissible in 4 court excep…”
- North Pacific Lumber Co. v. Oliver (Oregon Supreme Court 1979, 286 Or. 639)✓A lumber wholesaler secretly monitored traders' calls; on de novo review the court said the practice may have violated ORS 165.540 but refused to rest unclean hands on it, since the ex-employee's calls were never monitored. The employer's noncompete suit failed on other grounds.
- State v. Fleetwood (Oregon Supreme Court 2000, 331 Or. 511)✓A detective wired an informant and recorded the suspect's side of a phone call and his talks with his mother and a juvenile seller; the court held those interceptions violated ORS 165.540(1)(a) and (1)(c) because the informant was not a participant, and upheld suppression.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Oregon Audio Recording Laws: Split Consent Rules for Conversations and Calls, Oregon Phone Call Recording Laws: Split Consent Rules and Penalties, Oregon Laws on Recording Police: Your Rights and Legal Limits
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- ORS 163.700 - Invasion of Personal Privacy in the Second Degree(oregonlegislature.gov).gov
- ORS 163.701 - Invasion of Personal Privacy in the First Degree(oregonlegislature.gov).gov
- ORS 163A.005 - Sex Crime Classification(oregonlegislature.gov).gov
- ORS 163.472 - Unlawful Dissemination of an Intimate Image(oregonlegislature.gov).gov
- ORS 165.540 - Obtaining Contents of Communications(oregonlegislature.gov).gov
- Oregon DOJ Crime Victims Rights(doj.state.or.us).gov
- ORS 133.739 - Civil Remedies for Willful Interception(oregonlegislature.gov).gov