Oregon Phone Call Recording Laws: Split Consent Rules and Penalties

Oregon follows one-party consent for telephone calls under ORS 165.540(1)(a), meaning any participant may record a phone call without notifying the other party. This rule covers landline, cell, VoIP, and video calls. Oregon applies a stricter all-party notification standard only to in-person conversations, not to telephone communications.

Oregon allows you to record your own phone calls without telling the other person. Under ORS 165.540(1)(a), the state follows a one-party consent framework for telephone and electronic communications. As long as you are a participant in the call, your own consent satisfies the legal requirement.

This rule applies specifically to telephone and electronic communications. Oregon treats in-person conversations under a completely different standard, requiring all participants to be specifically informed before recording. Understanding this split consent framework is essential to staying on the right side of the law.

How Oregon's Split Consent Framework Applies to Phone Calls

One-Party Consent for Telephone Calls

ORS 165.540(1)(a) prohibits obtaining or attempting to obtain the whole or any part of a telecommunication or a radio communication to which the person is not a participant, unless consent has been given by one participant. The key phrase is "not a participant." If you are a participant in the call, the statute does not restrict you at all.

This means you can:

• Record any phone call you are part of without notifying the other party
• Use any recording device or app to capture the call
• Record calls on landlines, cell phones, VoIP platforms, and video calls with audio
• Record both personal and business calls you participate in

Why Phone Calls and In-Person Conversations Have Different Rules

Oregon's legislature crafted ORS 165.540 with a deliberate distinction between electronic and oral communications. Telephone calls and electronic communications fall under subsection (1)(a), which uses the one-party consent standard. In-person oral conversations fall under subsection (1)(c), which requires that all participants be "specifically informed" of any recording.

The reasoning behind this split is rooted in privacy expectations. Oregon's legislature determined that people have a heightened expectation of privacy during face-to-face conversations compared to telephone communications. The Ninth Circuit validated this reasoning in its January 2025 en banc decision in Project Veritas v. Schmidt, which upheld the in-person notification requirement as content-neutral and narrowly tailored.

For phone calls specifically, the one-party consent standard means you do not need to worry about the stricter in-person rules.

Types of Phone Calls Covered Under Oregon Law

Personal Cell Phone and Landline Calls

You can record any personal phone call you participate in, whether placed from a cell phone, landline, or internet-connected device. The statute covers all "telecommunications," which includes traditional telephone networks and modern cellular connections.

VoIP and Video Calls

Calls placed through Voice over Internet Protocol services like Skype and FaceTime, where you are simply talking with one other person, fall under the electronic communications provisions of ORS 165.540(1)(a). The one-party consent rule applies to these calls.

An ordinary video conferencing call through a platform like Zoom, Microsoft Teams, or Google Meet, however, is treated as a conversation under ORS 165.540(1)(c) by default, so recording it secretly risks a Class A misdemeanor even using the platform's built-in recording feature. A narrow exception under ORS 165.540(6)(b) allows recording a video conferencing call without notifying every participant only when the person recording intends to capture alleged unlawful activity and is a law enforcement officer or acting in coordination with one, is acting in coordination with an attorney or a regulatory entity, or reasonably believes the recording may be used as evidence in a judicial or administrative proceeding.

Conference Calls

When multiple people are on a conference call, the one-party consent rule still applies. Your participation in the call gives you legal authority to record the entire conversation. You do not need consent from each participant on the line.

Text-Based Communications

While ORS 165.540 focuses on audio interception, the statute also covers "electronic communications" more broadly. Text messages, emails, and other written electronic communications are generally not subject to the same interception rules because they do not involve real-time audio capture. However, intercepting someone else's electronic messages without authorization can violate federal law under 18 U.S.C. 2511.

Recording Phone Calls Across State Lines

The Interstate Recording Problem

Each U.S. state sets its own recording consent rules. When you place a call from Oregon to someone in another state, a conflict of laws question arises. Courts and legal authorities generally apply the stricter state's law to interstate calls.

Oregon's one-party consent for phone calls is the majority rule in the United States. However, several states require all parties to consent before a phone call can be recorded.

States With Stricter Phone Recording Laws

If you call someone in any of the following states, you should inform them before recording:

Washington is particularly relevant for Oregon residents because of geographic proximity. Washington requires consent from all parties to record any private conversation, whether by phone or in person. If you call a Washington number from Oregon, you should follow Washington's stricter standard.

Best Practice for Interstate Calls

A simple statement at the beginning of the call provides protection: "I am recording this call for my records." If the other person stays on the line after hearing this, courts generally treat that as implied consent.

Federal Wiretapping Law

Federal law under 18 U.S.C. 2511 follows the same one-party consent standard as Oregon for phone calls. Recordings made in compliance with Oregon's one-party consent rule also satisfy federal requirements.

One previously relevant federal rule -- 47 CFR section 64.501, which required telephone companies to provide beep tones or verbal announcements before recording calls -- was removed by the FCC effective November 20, 2017. That rule no longer applies, and the FCC has not replaced it with a new interstate call-recording disclosure rule. FCC Order 24-24 (2024) addresses a different subject, consumers revoking consent to robocalls and robotexts under the TCPA, and does not govern call-recording notice. Private call recording by individuals is governed by state law under the one-party consent framework.

Business Phone Call Recording in Oregon

Employer Rights

Oregon businesses can record phone calls for legitimate business purposes under the one-party consent framework. Common reasons include:

• Quality assurance and customer service training
• Compliance documentation for regulated industries
• Maintaining records of verbal agreements
• Monitoring employee performance on customer calls

If the business or its employee is a party to the call, the one-party consent requirement is satisfied. Employers do not need to notify callers under Oregon phone recording law, though many choose to do so as a best practice.

Employee Rights

Employees in Oregon can record their own work-related phone calls under the one-party consent rule. This includes calls with supervisors, HR representatives, clients, and coworkers. Because these are telephone communications, the stricter in-person notification rule does not apply.

However, employer policies may restrict or prohibit call recording. Violating an internal company policy can result in disciplinary action or termination, even though the recording itself is legal under state law. The National Labor Relations Act offers some protection when employees record calls related to protected concerted activity, such as documenting workplace safety violations or wage disputes.

Best Practices for Business Recording

• Play an automated disclosure at the start of customer service calls
• Train employees on the difference between phone recording (one-party consent) and in-person recording (all-party notification)
• Establish written recording policies and distribute them to all staff
• Store recordings securely and comply with data retention requirements
• When calling customers in other states, default to informing the other party

Using Recorded Phone Calls as Evidence in Oregon

Admissibility Rules

Phone call recordings made in compliance with Oregon's one-party consent law are generally admissible as evidence in Oregon courts. To introduce a recording, you need to establish:

• Authentication: The recording is genuine and has not been altered
• Identification: A witness can identify the voices on the recording
• Relevance: The recording relates to the issues in the case
• Chain of custody: The recording has been properly preserved since it was made

Inadmissible Recordings

Under ORS 41.910, recordings obtained in violation of the law are inadmissible in Oregon courts. If you record a phone call without being a participant and without consent from any party, that recording cannot be used as evidence even if it contains relevant information.

Common Uses in Court

Legally recorded phone calls are frequently used as evidence in:

• Family law cases: Custody disputes, divorce proceedings, and harassment claims
• Contract disputes: Proving the terms of verbal agreements
• Employment cases: Documenting discrimination, retaliation, or hostile work environment claims
• Personal injury cases: Recording statements from insurance adjusters or opposing parties
• Criminal cases: Providing evidence of threats, fraud, or other criminal conduct

Tips for Preserving Recording Evidence

• Keep the original recording file unedited
• Record the date, time, duration, and participants immediately after each call
• Store the original in a secure location with at least one backup copy
• Do not share the recording before presenting it in court
• Consult with an attorney about proper evidence introduction procedures

Penalties for Illegal Phone Call Recording in Oregon

Criminal Penalties

Violating ORS 165.540(1)(a) by recording a phone call you are not a party to without consent is a Class A misdemeanor in Oregon. Under ORS 161.615 and ORS 161.635:

Civil Liability

Under ORS 133.739, a person whose phone communications are willfully intercepted can bring a civil lawsuit. Available remedies include:

• Actual damages, but not less than $100 per day of violation or $1,000, whichever is greater
• Punitive damages at the court's discretion
• Reasonable attorney fees for the prevailing party

A good faith reliance on a court order or legislative authorization is a complete defense to civil claims.

The Felony Exception Does Not Apply to Phone Calls

Oregon's narrow felony exception under ORS 165.540(5)(a) permits recording an in-person conversation without notification during a felony that endangers human life. This exception was designed for in-person situations and does not expand your rights regarding phone call recording. The one-party consent rule for phone calls already permits recording calls you participate in, so the felony exception is rarely relevant in the phone call context.

AI Transcription and Call Recording Tools

AI-powered transcription services like Otter.ai, Fireflies.ai, and platform-native transcription in Zoom and Microsoft Teams have become standard tools for capturing phone conversations. In Oregon, using these tools follows the same one-party consent rules as any other phone recording method.

If you are a party to the call, you can activate AI recording and transcription without notifying the other participants. Some AI tools join calls as a separate "bot" participant, which may alert others that recording is active. Review your tool's settings to understand how it appears to other call participants.

For video conferencing platforms specifically, Oregon's ORS 165.540(6)(b) exemption is narrow: it excuses skipping notification only when the person recording intends to capture alleged unlawful activity and is a law enforcement officer or acting in coordination with one, is acting in coordination with an attorney or a regulatory entity, or reasonably believes the recording may be used as evidence in a judicial or administrative proceeding. For an ordinary AI-assisted video call, that means you still need to notify every participant before turning on the platform's built-in recording feature.

Oregon Recording Laws by Topic

Phone Call Recording | Audio Recording | Video Recording | Workplace Recording | Recording Police | Security Cameras | Recording in Public | Landlord-Tenant | Dashcam Laws | Schools | Medical Recording | Voyeurism & Hidden Cameras

Back to Oregon Recording Laws

More Oregon Recording Topics

• Oregon Biometric Privacy Laws
• Surveillance Camera Laws

More Oregon Laws

• Oregon AI Meeting Recording Laws
• Oregon Dashcam Laws
• Oregon Data Privacy Laws
• Oregon Deepfake Laws
• Oregon Employee Monitoring Laws
• Oregon GPS Tracking Laws
• Oregon Police Bodycam Laws
• Oregon Smart Glasses Recording Laws