Oregon flag

Oregon

Oregon Laws on Recording Police: Your Rights and Legal Limits

Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 22, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 22, 2026. · 6 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Oregon Laws on Recording Police: Your Rights and Legal Limits

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I record police officers in Oregon?

Yes. You have a First Amendment right to record police officers performing their duties in public. Silent video recording is always legal. For audio recording, keep your device visible to take advantage of the unconcealed device exception under ORS 165.540(6)(a), and do not physically interfere with police operations.

Can a police officer tell me to stop recording in Oregon?

An officer cannot order you to stop recording solely because you are filming. However, an officer can ask you to move if you are physically interfering with their duties, creating a safety hazard, or within an established perimeter. If asked to move back, comply while continuing to record from a safe distance.

Can police seize my phone in Oregon?

Police generally cannot seize your phone without a warrant. If they claim exigent circumstances, the seizure must be justified. Officers cannot delete your recordings under any circumstances. If your phone is seized, do not consent to a search and contact an attorney.

Can I record police during a protest in Oregon?

Yes. The First Amendment protects recording at protests and demonstrations. Oregon's unconcealed device exception also supports recording at rallies and public demonstrations with a visible device. Stay at a safe distance, do not interfere with police operations, and keep your recording device visible.

What should I do if police violate my recording rights in Oregon?

Remain calm during the encounter and do not resist. Note the officer's badge number and name. Document everything in writing afterward. File a complaint with the department's internal affairs division. Contact the ACLU of Oregon or a civil rights attorney about potential claims under 42 U.S.C. 1983.

Updates

Corrected a KeyTakeaways bullet that inverted Project Veritas v. Schmidt's holding: the case upheld Oregon's all-party notification requirement, it did not create a right to record police, which instead comes from Fordyce v. Seattle and Askins v. DHS.

Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes

Corrected three mis-cites of the unconcealed-device exception (KeyTakeaways, body text, and FAQ) from ORS 165.540(2), the telecom-employee/jail-official exception, to the correct ORS 165.540(6)(a).

Governing law re-checked for recent changes

Governing law re-checked for recent changes

Reviewed and approved by an editor

Sources and References

  1. ORS 165.540 - Obtaining Contents of Communications(oregonlegislature.gov).gov
  2. ORS 162.247 - Interfering With a Police Officer(oregonlegislature.gov).gov
  3. ORS 181A.250 - Law Enforcement Surveillance Limits(oregonlegislature.gov).gov
  4. ORS 192.311-478 - Oregon Public Records Law(oregonlegislature.gov).gov
  5. Oregon DPSST(oregon.gov).gov
  6. 42 U.S.C. 1983 - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights(law.cornell.edu)
  7. Project Veritas v. Schmidt - Ninth Circuit En Banc Opinion(cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov).gov
Share: