California
California School Recording Laws: Students, Teachers, and Campus Rules (2026)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 22, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 22, 2026. · 10 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content
California treats recording on school grounds differently than recording in most other settings. Two separate bodies of law apply: the state's general two-party consent wiretapping statute (Cal. Penal Code 632) and a standalone Education Code provision that specifically addresses recording in classrooms. Both create obligations for students, teachers, parents, and administrators. Getting the rules wrong can result in school discipline, misdemeanor criminal charges, or both.
Education Code 51512: The Core K-12 Classroom Recording Ban
The primary statute governing recording in California's elementary and secondary schools is Education Code Section 51512. This law specifically targets electronic recording devices in the classroom, and its text is broad.
The Legislature found that the use of any electronic listening or recording device in any classroom without the prior consent of the teacher and principal "disrupts and impairs the teaching process and discipline." Based on that finding, the statute flatly prohibits such use unless both the teacher and the principal have given consent, and that consent was given to promote an educational purpose.
This means a student cannot pull out a phone and hit record during class. A parent cannot send their child to school with a hidden recording device. A journalist cannot walk into a classroom and start filming.
Who Needs to Give Consent
Section 51512 requires two layers of approval before any recording can happen in a K-12 classroom:
- The teacher of that specific classroom must consent
- The principal of the school must consent
Both must agree, and both must determine that the recording serves an educational purpose. General curiosity, personal documentation, or a parent's desire to monitor a teacher's performance do not qualify.
Penalties Under Section 51512
The statute draws a distinction between students and non-students:
- Students who violate the law face "appropriate disciplinary action." This could range from confiscation of the device to suspension, depending on school district policy.
- Non-students (parents, visitors, journalists, or anyone else) who willfully violate the law commit a misdemeanor under California law.
The statute also includes a savings clause: it does not affect powers, rights, or liabilities created by other laws. This means that Penal Code 632 can still apply on top of Education Code 51512 in some situations.
Penal Code 632: How the General Wiretapping Law Applies on Campus
California's general wiretapping statute, Penal Code 632, makes it a crime to record or eavesdrop on a "confidential communication" without the consent of all parties involved. This is separate from the Education Code provision and applies everywhere in California, including school grounds.
The key question in a school setting is whether a particular communication qualifies as "confidential" under the statute. Penal Code 632 defines a confidential communication as one "carried on in circumstances as may reasonably indicate that any party to the communication desires it to be confined to the parties thereto."
The statute explicitly excludes communications made in a "public gathering" or in circumstances where the parties may "reasonably expect that the communication may be overheard or recorded."
Classroom Lectures vs. Private Conversations
A teacher delivering a lecture to 30 students is not having a confidential conversation. The content is being shared openly with an audience. Under the logic of Penal Code 632, a classroom lecture may not qualify as a "confidential communication" because neither the teacher nor the students have a reasonable expectation that what is said will be confined to the parties present.
That said, Education Code 51512 still prohibits recording the lecture without consent, regardless of whether Penal Code 632 applies. The Education Code creates its own independent prohibition.
Private conversations on school grounds are another matter. A one-on-one discussion between a teacher and a student in a closed office, a private meeting between a parent and a counselor, or a conversation between two students in a quiet hallway could all qualify as confidential communications. Recording those exchanges without consent from all parties would violate Penal Code 632.
Penalties Under Penal Code 632
Penal Code 632 is a "wobbler" offense, meaning prosecutors can charge it as either a misdemeanor or a felony depending on the circumstances:
- First offense (misdemeanor): Fine of up to $2,500 per violation, imprisonment in county jail for up to one year, or both
- Repeat offense: Fine of up to $10,000 per violation, imprisonment in county jail for up to one year or state prison, or both
- Civil liability: Victims can sue for damages of $5,000 per violation or three times the actual damages, whichever is greater, under Penal Code 637.2
Can Students Record Their Teachers?
The short answer: not without permission. Under Education Code 51512, a student needs the consent of both the teacher and the principal before using any electronic recording device in a K-12 classroom.
There are limited exceptions. If the teacher and principal both agree that recording serves an educational purpose, the student may record. Some teachers give blanket permission for students to record lectures for note-taking purposes. Others prohibit it entirely. The teacher's and principal's decisions control.
Students who record without permission face disciplinary consequences determined by their school district. This could include detention, confiscation of the device, suspension, or other measures outlined in the school's disciplinary code.
If a student records a private, confidential conversation (not a classroom lecture) without the other person's consent, Penal Code 632 could also apply, potentially exposing the student to criminal liability.
Can Teachers Record Students?
Teachers have more authority in the classroom than students, but they are not exempt from recording laws. The rules differ depending on what kind of recording is involved.
Audio Recording by Teachers
Under Education Code 51512, teachers may use audio recording devices to record their own classroom instruction for professional improvement purposes. This is an accepted educational purpose.
Recording students' private conversations, behavior outside class, or meetings with students or parents without consent is a different matter. If the conversation qualifies as confidential under Penal Code 632, the teacher needs all-party consent.
Video Recording in Classrooms
Video surveillance in classrooms raises additional concerns. School & College Legal Services of California has noted that any recording inside a classroom must promote an educational purpose and must have prior consent from both the school administrator and the classroom teacher.
California school districts that operate surveillance camera systems must first adopt a board policy governing the installation and operation of those cameras. Most districts prohibit audio capture on any surveillance system. Video cameras are generally permitted in common areas (hallways, cafeterias, parking lots, building exteriors) but are restricted in areas where students have a reasonable expectation of privacy, such as bathrooms and locker rooms.
Recording as a Disability Accommodation
Both Education Code 51512 and Education Code 78907 (the community college counterpart) contain a critical exception: the prohibition on recording does not apply when recording is "necessary to provide reasonable auxiliary aids and academic adjustments to disabled students."
This exception implements requirements from federal law. Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) both require schools receiving federal funding to provide reasonable accommodations to students with disabilities.
How the Accommodation Process Works
A student with a documented disability (such as a learning disability, ADHD, visual impairment, auditory processing disorder, or mobility limitation affecting note-taking) can request recording as an accommodation through the school's disability services office or 504 coordinator.
Once approved, the accommodation typically allows the student to audio-record lectures. The teacher cannot override this accommodation. Disability Rights California has confirmed that a professor or teacher may not forbid recording that has been approved as a disability accommodation.
Students using this accommodation generally must agree to certain conditions: recordings are for personal study only, they cannot be shared with other students or posted online, and they must be deleted at the end of the course.
IEP-Related Recording Accommodations
For K-12 students with Individualized Education Programs (IEPs), recording as a classroom accommodation can be written directly into the IEP. Once included in the IEP, the school district is legally required to implement it under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA).
Recording IEP Meetings in California
California has a specific statute governing the recording of IEP meetings, and it gives parents substantial rights. Education Code 56341.1(g) provides that both the parent (or guardian) and the school district have the right to audio-record IEP team meetings.
The 24-Hour Notice Rule
The statute requires the party intending to record to notify the other IEP team members at least 24 hours before the meeting. Disability Rights California recommends providing this notice in writing (such as an email) so there is a documented record of when notice was given.
Parent Recording vs. District Recording
An important asymmetry exists in the law:
- If a parent wants to record and the district objects, the parent may still record. The district's objection does not override the parent's right.
- If the district wants to record and the parent objects, the meeting cannot be recorded by either party. The district must respect the parent's objection.
This means a parent's recording right is, in practice, stronger than the district's. A parent who provides 24 hours' notice can record the IEP meeting even over the school's protest.
What Equipment Is Allowed
Parents may use any audio-recording device, including an app on a smartphone, tablet, or laptop. The statute covers audio recording only. Video recording of IEP meetings is not addressed by Education Code 56341.1, and requesting video may be denied by the district.
FERPA Protections for IEP Recordings
Audio recordings made by a school district during IEP meetings become part of the student's educational record and are subject to the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) and its implementing regulations at 34 C.F.R. Sections 300.610 through 300.626. This means the recordings are confidential, parents have the right to access them, and the district cannot release them without consent except under FERPA's limited exceptions.
Parents Recording Teachers and School Officials
Outside the IEP context, parents face the same legal restrictions as anyone else. California's two-party consent law (Penal Code 632) applies to private conversations between parents and school staff. Education Code 51512 applies if the recording takes place in a classroom.
A parent who secretly records a meeting with a teacher, principal, or counselor without the other party's consent risks criminal liability if the conversation is deemed confidential. The safest approach is to request permission to record at the start of any meeting. If the school refuses, the parent should note the refusal in writing.
Distance Learning Recordings
Senate Bill 820 (signed September 18, 2020) clarified that existing classroom recording restrictions extend to distance learning. Under this law:
- School districts may record synchronous and asynchronous distance learning sessions and distribute those recordings for educational purposes
- Parents, students, and other third parties may not make any audio, video, or digital recording of live or synchronous distance learning instruction without the consent of the teacher and principal
This means that even when instruction is delivered to a student's home through a screen, the same consent requirements apply.
School Surveillance Cameras in California
California does not have a single statute comprehensively regulating security cameras in schools. Instead, the rules come from a combination of constitutional privacy principles, FERPA, Education Code 51512, and individual school board policies.
Where Cameras Are Permitted
Security cameras are generally allowed in areas where students do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy:
- Hallways and corridors
- Cafeterias and lunch areas
- Parking lots and exterior grounds
- Gymnasiums (during non-changing times)
- School bus interiors
- Building entrances and exits
Where Cameras Are Prohibited
Cameras are prohibited in areas where students have a reasonable expectation of privacy:
- Bathrooms and restrooms
- Locker rooms and changing areas
Board Policy Requirement
Before installing surveillance cameras, a school district's governing board must adopt a policy governing the installation, operation, and use of the system. The Louisa Union School District camera protocol provides a representative example of what these policies typically cover: camera placement, signage requirements, data retention periods, and access restrictions.
Audio Capture on Surveillance Systems
Most California school districts prohibit audio recording on their surveillance systems. Video-only monitoring in common areas is the standard practice. Adding audio capture to a camera system in a classroom would implicate Education Code 51512 and potentially Penal Code 632.
Recording at California Universities and Community Colleges
The rules for higher education in California differ from K-12, though the structure is similar.
Education Code 78907 (Community Colleges)
Education Code 78907 mirrors Section 51512 for the community college system. It prohibits the use of any electronic listening or recording device in any community college classroom without the prior consent of the instructor, except as necessary to provide reasonable auxiliary aids and academic adjustments to disabled students.
- Non-students who violate the law face misdemeanor charges
- Students face disciplinary action
- Students with approved disability accommodations are exempt
UC and CSU Systems
The University of California and California State University systems set recording policies at the institutional level. Across both systems, the general rule is that instructors control whether their lectures may be recorded. Many campuses require students to obtain explicit permission before recording.
UC policy recognizes that course lectures are the intellectual property of the instructor. The University of California copyright office has stated that copyrights to video or audio recordings of lectures made by instructors belong to the instructors. Students who record without permission may violate both campus policy and the instructor's copyright.
College Board SAT Smart Glasses Ban (March 2026)
In a development relevant to campus recording rules, the College Board announced in February 2026 that it would prohibit students from wearing smart glasses during the SAT, effective March 2026. The ban extends the existing prohibition on wearable electronics (such as smartwatches and earbuds) to include any internet-connected eyewear, even if the frames contain prescription lenses.
SAT proctors are now trained to identify smart glasses by their distinctive thick rims and the camera indicator light that activates during use. Students who need prescription lenses must bring non-smart frames to the test. This policy reflects growing concern about recording and AI-assisted cheating in academic settings.
Recording School Board Meetings Under the Brown Act
School board meetings are public proceedings, and California law protects the public's right to record them.
Government Code 54953.5, part of the Ralph M. Brown Act, provides that any person attending an open and public meeting has the right to record the proceedings with an audio recorder, video recorder, or still camera. This right exists unless the legislative body makes a reasonable finding that recording "cannot continue without noise, illumination, or obstruction of view that constitutes, or would constitute, a persistent disruption of the proceedings."
What This Means in Practice
Parents, journalists, and community members attending a school board meeting can record audio, video, or both without asking permission. The board cannot adopt a blanket rule banning recording. It can only restrict recording in specific instances where the recording equipment itself is genuinely disruptive.
If the school board chooses to make its own recording of the meeting, that recording becomes a public record subject to the California Public Records Act. However, the board may erase or destroy its recording 30 days after the meeting.
SB 707 Changes for 2026
Senate Bill 707, effective January 1, 2026, made several updates to the Brown Act, including modernized teleconference rules and new requirements for providing board members with copies of the Brown Act. The public's right to record meetings was not changed by SB 707 and remains intact.
Charter schools face additional requirements: they must record and post audio or video of their board meetings online.
FERPA and Student Privacy in School Recordings
The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) adds a federal layer to school recording rules. FERPA protects the privacy of student education records and applies to all schools that receive federal funding.
When Recordings Become Education Records
A recording of a classroom session becomes an education record under FERPA if it is "maintained" by the school or a party acting on behalf of the school and if it contains information directly related to a student. According to the U.S. Department of Education, a photo or video is an education record when it is directly related to a student and maintained by an educational agency or institution.
Class recordings where individual students are identifiable (appearing on camera, being called by name, discussing personal matters) can constitute education records for each student who appears.
Sharing and Redaction Requirements
Before a school can release a recording that contains images or information about multiple students, it must redact all identifying information about students other than the one whose record is being requested. The Department of Education has noted that the same recording can become part of multiple students' education records, but cross-student disclosure requires either consent or a valid FERPA exception.
Schools may designate photos or videos of students at public events (sporting events, concerts, theater performances) as directory information, but this designation must follow the proper notice and opt-out procedures under FERPA.
Penalties Summary
| Violation | Law | Penalty |
|---|---|---|
| Recording in K-12 classroom without consent (non-student) | Education Code 51512 | Misdemeanor criminal charge |
| Recording in K-12 classroom without consent (student) | Education Code 51512 | School disciplinary action |
| Recording confidential communication without consent (first offense) | Penal Code 632 | Up to $2,500 fine, up to 1 year county jail, or both |
| Recording confidential communication without consent (repeat offense) | Penal Code 632 | Up to $10,000 fine, up to 1 year county jail or state prison, or both |
| Recording in community college classroom without consent (non-student) | Education Code 78907 | Misdemeanor criminal charge |
| Recording in community college classroom without consent (student) | Education Code 78907 | School disciplinary action |
| Recording distance learning without consent | Education Code 51512 (as amended by SB 820) | Same as classroom recording |
| Civil liability for illegal recording | Penal Code 637.2 | $5,000 per violation or 3x actual damages |
Related California Recording Law Topics
- California Recording Laws Overview
- California Audio Recording Laws
- California Video Recording Laws
- California Workplace Recording Laws
- California Laws on Recording Police
- California Security Camera and Surveillance Laws
- California Laws on Recording in Public
- California Phone Call Recording Laws
This article provides general legal information about California school recording laws. It is not legal advice. Recording laws involve interactions between state and federal statutes that vary based on specific circumstances. Consult an attorney for advice specific to your situation.
More California Recording Topics
- California Medical Recording
- California Voyeurism Recording
- California Landlord Tenant Recording
- California Biometric Privacy Laws
- Surveillance Camera Laws
More California Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I record my teacher in California?
Not without permission. California Education Code 51512 prohibits students from using any electronic recording device in a K-12 classroom without prior consent from both the teacher and the school principal. The only exception is for students with disabilities who have an approved accommodation allowing them to record. Violating this law can result in school disciplinary action.
Can parents record IEP meetings in California?
Yes. Under Education Code 56341.1(g), parents have the right to audio-record IEP meetings. The parent must provide at least 24 hours' written notice to the school district before the meeting. If the parent wants to record and the district objects, the parent may still record. However, if the district wants to record and the parent objects, no recording may occur.
Are security cameras allowed in California school classrooms?
Video surveillance in California school classrooms is heavily restricted. Any camera in a classroom requires the consent of both the teacher and the school administrator, and must serve an educational purpose. Most school districts limit cameras to common areas like hallways, cafeterias, and parking lots. Audio recording on surveillance systems is generally prohibited.
Can a student with a disability record lectures in California?
Yes. Both Education Code 51512 (K-12) and Education Code 78907 (community colleges) exempt recording that is necessary to provide reasonable auxiliary aids and academic adjustments to students with disabilities. This right is backed by Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act and the ADA. Students must go through their school's disability services office to get recording approved as an accommodation.
Can I record a California school board meeting?
Yes. Under Government Code 54953.5 (the Brown Act), any person attending an open school board meeting has the right to record with audio, video, or still cameras. The board can only restrict recording if the equipment itself is creating a persistent disruption to the proceedings. This right applies to all public meetings of local legislative bodies in California.
Can I legally record a distance learning class in California?
Generally, no. Under Senate Bill 820, the same consent rules that apply in a physical classroom extend to synchronous distance learning. Parents, students, and other third parties may not make an audio, video, or digital recording of a live distance learning session without the consent of both the teacher and the principal. School districts, however, may record and distribute distance learning sessions for their own educational purposes.
Updates
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
California Education Code
§ 51512In force
The Legislature finds that the use by any person, including a pupil, of any electronic listening or recording device in any classroom of the elementary and secondary schools without the prior consent of the teacher and the principal of the school given to promote an educational purpose disrupts and impairs the teaching process and discipline in the elementary and secondary schools, and such use is prohibited. Any person, other than a pupil, who willfully violates this section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. Any pupil violating this section shall be subject to appropriate disciplinary action. This section shall not be construed as affecting the powers, rights, and liabilities arising from the use of electronic listening or recording devices as provided for by any other provision of law.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
Cited in 2 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2011
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Evens v. Superior Court (California Court of Appeal 1999, 91 Cal. Rptr. 2d 497)“…itiously videotape-recorded her class. This action violated Education Code section 51512 (Section 51512) which specifically proh…”
- C.F. Ex Rel Farnan v. Capistrano Unified School District (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2011, 654 F.3d 975)“…d at 1141 n.3. Corbett also suggests that Farnan violated California Education Code section 51512 by recording his lectures without writt…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 56341.1In force
(a) When developing each pupil’s individualized education program, the individualized education program team shall consider the following: (1) The strengths of the pupil. (2) The concerns of the parents or guardians for enhancing the education of the pupil. (3) The results of the initial assessment or most recent assessment of the pupil. (4) The academic, developmental, and functional needs of the child. (b) The individualized education program team shall do the following: (1) In the case of a pupil whose behavior impedes his or her learning or that of others, consider the use of positive behavioral interventions and supports, and other strategies, to address that behavior. (2) In the case of a pupil with limited English proficiency, consider the language needs of the pupil as those needs relate to the pupil’s individualized education program.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
Cited in 4 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- M.C. Ex Rel. M.N. v. Antelope Valley Union High School District (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2017, 858 F.3d 1189)“…equires that the IEP “include a statement to that effect.” Cal. Educ. Code § 56341.1(b)(5), (c). M.C.’s IEP initially indic…”
- M.C. v. Antelope Valley Union High (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2017)“…requires that the IEP “include a statement to that effect.” Cal. Educ. Code § 56341.1(b)(5), (c). M.C.’s IEP initially indica…”
- Poway Unified School District v. Cheng Ex Rel. Cheng (District Court, S.D. California 2011, 821 F. Supp. 2d 1197)“…school” and she cites 20 U.S.C. § 1414 (d)(3)(B)(iv) and Cal. Educ. Code § 56341.1 (b)(4), which are basically identical.…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 78907In force
The use by any person, including a student, of any electronic listening or recording device in any classroom without the prior consent of the instructor is prohibited, except as necessary to provide reasonable auxiliary aids and academic adjustments to disabled students. Any person, other than a student, who willfully violates this section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. Any student violating this section shall be subject to appropriate disciplinary action. This section shall not be construed as affecting the powers, rights, and liabilities arising from the use of electronic listening or recording devices as provided for by any other provision of law.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
California Government Code
§ 54953.5In forcecited in 2 of our articles
(a) Any person attending an open and public meeting of a legislative body of a local agency shall have the right to record the proceedings in the absence of a reasonable finding by the legislative body of the local agency that the recording cannot continue without noise, illumination, or obstruction of view that constitutes, or would constitute, a persistent disruption of the proceedings. (b) Any recording of an open and public meeting made for whatever purpose by or at the direction of the local agency shall be subject to inspection pursuant to the California Public Records Act (Division 10 (commencing with Section 7920.000) of Title 1), but, notwithstanding Section 34090, may be erased or destroyed 30 days after the recording. Any inspection of an audio or video recording shall be provided without charge on equipment made available by the local agency.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 1993
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Choice-In-Education League v. Los Angeles Unified School District (California Court of Appeal 1993, 17 Cal. App. 4th 415)“…Government Code.” (See also Gov. Code, § 54953, subd. (a).) Government Code section 54953.5 provides that “[a]ny person attending a…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: California Recording Laws (2026): All-Party Consent Rules
California Penal Code
§ 632In forcecited in 39 of our articles
(a) A person who, intentionally and without the consent of all parties to a confidential communication, uses an electronic amplifying or recording device to eavesdrop upon or record the confidential communication, whether the communication is carried on among the parties in the presence of one another or by means of a telegraph, telephone, or other device, except a radio, shall be punished by a fine not exceeding two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500) per violation, or imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year, or in the state prison, or by both that fine and imprisonment. If the person has previously been convicted of a violation of this section or Section 631, 632.5, 632.6, 632.7, or 636, the person shall be punished by a fine not exceeding ten thousand dollars ($10,000) per violation, by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year, or in the state prison, or by both that fine and imprisonment.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
Cited in 267 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Kimmel v. Goland (1990) held the section 47(2) litigation privilege does not bar a damages claim under Section 632 for recording confidential conversations without consent. Lieberman v. KCOP Television, Inc. (2003) held a Section 632 violation is complete the moment the recording is made, whether or not it is disclosed.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Rubin v. Green (California Supreme Court 1993, 4 Cal. 4th 1187)“…f telephone conversations with defendants, an offense under Penal Code section 632. We noted that defendants alleged that…”
- Kimmel v. Goland (California Supreme Court 1990, 51 Cal. 3d 202)✓Mobilehome owners secretly taped phone calls with park management in anticipation of suing; the court held the section 47(2) litigation privilege did not bar the cross-complaint for damages under Penal Code section 632, since the injury came from recording, not publication.
- Shulman v. Group W Productions, Inc. (California Supreme Court 1998, 74 Cal. Rptr. 2d 843)✓A TV producer put a wireless microphone on the flight nurse treating a crash victim. No section 632 claim was before the court, but it called section 632 and the intrusion tort laws of general applicability and said the press may not eavesdrop in violation of section 632.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: US Recording Laws by State (2026): All 50 States Explained, Can an Employer Record Conversations Without Consent? (2026), Can I Sue Someone for Recording Me on Private or Public Property?
§ 637.2In forcecited in 20 of our articles
(a) Any person who has been injured by a violation of this chapter may bring an action against the person who committed the violation for the greater of the following amounts: (1) Five thousand dollars ($5,000) per violation. (2) Three times the amount of actual damages, if any, sustained by the plaintiff. (b) Any person may, in accordance with Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 525) of Title 7 of Part 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, bring an action to enjoin and restrain any violation of this chapter, and may in the same action seek damages as provided by subdivision (a). (c) It is not a necessary prerequisite to an action pursuant to this section that the plaintiff has suffered, or be threatened with, actual damages. (d) This section shall not be construed to affect Title 4 (commencing with Section 3425.1) of Part 1 of Division 4 of the Civil Code.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
Cited in 103 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Ribas v. Clark (1985) held the section 637.2 award accrues at the moment of the Privacy Act violation, so the Civil Code section 47 litigation privilege does not bar it, though damages flowing solely from privileged testimony fail. Kimmel v. Goland (1990) applied that reasoning to recordings made in anticipation of litigation.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Rubin v. Green (California Supreme Court 1993, 4 Cal. 4th 1187)“…asion of privacy and related torts as well as damages under Penal Code section 637.2, granting persons injured by eavesdropp…”
- Ribas v. Clark (California Supreme Court 1985, 38 Cal. 3d 355)✓A wife asked a third party to listen on an extension phone while she called her husband, and that listener later testified about it; the court held the judicial privilege barred damages from the testimony but not Section 637.2's fixed award, which accrues at the violation.
- Kimmel v. Goland (California Supreme Court 1990, 51 Cal. 3d 202)✓Mobilehome residents secretly taped calls with park management to gather evidence for a planned lawsuit; the court held the litigation privilege did not bar management's Section 637.2 claim, because the injury came from the recording itself and not from any publication.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: How to Detect and Block Listening Devices in Your Home (2026), Is It Illegal to Video Record Someone Without Their Consent? (2026), Otter.ai Lawsuit: Judge Lets Core Privacy Claims Proceed (2026)
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- California Education Code Section 51512 (K-12 Classroom Recording Prohibition)(leginfo.legislature.ca.gov).gov
- California Penal Code Section 632 (Eavesdropping and Recording Law)(leginfo.legislature.ca.gov).gov
- California Education Code Section 56341.1 (IEP Meeting Recording Rights)(leginfo.legislature.ca.gov).gov
- California Education Code Section 78907 (Community College Classroom Recording)(leginfo.legislature.ca.gov).gov
- California Government Code Section 54953.5 (Brown Act Recording Rights)(leginfo.legislature.ca.gov).gov
- California Penal Code Section 637.2 (Civil Remedies for Illegal Recording)(leginfo.legislature.ca.gov).gov
- FERPA (Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act)(studentprivacy.ed.gov).gov
- U.S. Department of Education: Photos and Videos Under FERPA(studentprivacy.ed.gov).gov
- Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act(ed.gov).gov
- Senate Bill 707 (2026 Brown Act Changes)(leginfo.legislature.ca.gov).gov
- College Board Prohibited Devices for SAT(satsuite.collegeboard.org)
- Disability Rights California: Recording IEP Meetings(serr.disabilityrightsca.org)
- UC Copyright Office: Recorded Presentations(copyright.universityofcalifornia.edu)