Wisconsin
Wisconsin Laws on Recording in Public: Filming, Photography, and Privacy (2026)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 15, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 15, 2026. · 9 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Recording in public places in Wisconsin is legal. The First Amendment protects your right to photograph, film, and audio record on streets, sidewalks, parks, and other public spaces. Audio recording of conversations you join is lawful under the one-party consent rule in Wis. Stat. 968.31.
Public recording in Wisconsin is broadly protected by the First Amendment and supported by state law. You have the right to photograph, video record, and audio record in public spaces where no reasonable expectation of privacy exists. This right extends to filming government buildings, recording public protests, photographing police activity, and documenting anything visible from a public area.
This guide explains the scope of your public recording rights in Wisconsin, the limitations that apply, and how to handle situations where someone challenges your right to film.
The First Amendment and Public Recording
Constitutional Foundation
The right to record in public is grounded in the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which protects freedom of speech, freedom of the press, and the right to gather information about matters of public interest. Federal courts, including the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals that covers Wisconsin, have recognized that recording is a form of protected expression.
This protection applies to everyone, not just journalists. Ordinary citizens, bloggers, social media creators, and activists all share the same right to record in public spaces.
What Is a "Public Space"?
A public space, for recording purposes, is any area where people do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy. In Wisconsin, this includes:
- Streets and sidewalks. These are traditional public forums with the strongest First Amendment protections.
- Public parks and plazas. Municipal parks, state parks, and public squares are open for recording.
- Government buildings. Areas of courthouses, city halls, state office buildings, and other government facilities that are open to the public.
- Public transportation. Bus stops, train platforms, and the exterior of transit vehicles.
- Retail areas open to the public. The publicly accessible portions of stores, malls, and restaurants (though the property owner may restrict recording).
- Public events. Parades, festivals, sporting events held in public venues, and community gatherings.
Recording Government Meetings

Wisconsin's Open Meetings Law
Wisconsin has one of the strongest open meetings laws in the country. Wis. Stat. 19.81 declares that "the public is entitled to the fullest and most complete information regarding the affairs of government as is compatible with the conduct of governmental business."
Under this law, meetings of governmental bodies must be open to the public, and the public has the right to record these meetings. This applies to:
- County board meetings. All 72 Wisconsin county boards must hold open meetings.
- City council and village board meetings. Municipal governing body meetings are open.
- School board meetings. Public school district board meetings are subject to the Open Meetings Law.
- Town board meetings. Township meetings are covered.
- Committee meetings. Standing committees, special committees, and subcommittees of governmental bodies must hold open meetings.
- State legislative proceedings. Sessions of the Wisconsin State Assembly and Senate are open, though recording may be limited to designated areas.
Enforcement and Violations
If a governmental body prevents you from recording an open meeting, you may have recourse under Wis. Stat. 19.97 (enforcement) and Wis. Stat. 19.96 (penalty). Remedies for Open Meetings Law violations include:
- Voiding actions taken in closed session that should have been open
- Forfeiture penalties of $25 to $300 for each violation against individual members, under Wis. Stat. 19.96
- Attorney fees for successful enforcement actions
- Mandamus actions to compel future compliance
The Wisconsin Department of Justice provides guidance on the Open Meetings Law and can receive complaints about violations.
Recording on Public Streets and Sidewalks

Your Rights
On public streets and sidewalks, you have the broadest recording rights. You can:
- Photograph or video record any person, building, or activity visible from the public space
- Record police officers performing their duties
- Film accidents, fires, or other newsworthy events
- Photograph private buildings from the public sidewalk
- Record street performers, demonstrators, or public speakers
- Livestream activities happening in public
Limitations
Even on public streets, certain activities are restricted:
- Obstructing traffic. You cannot block vehicular or pedestrian traffic while recording. Local ordinances in Milwaukee, Madison, and other cities address obstruction.
- Interfering with emergency operations. You must stay clear of active emergency scenes and follow lawful orders from first responders.
- Trespassing. You cannot step onto private property to get a better camera angle.
- Harassment. Following someone persistently with a camera, especially after being asked to stop, may constitute harassment under Wis. Stat. 947.013 depending on the circumstances.
Recording Protests and Demonstrations

Protester Rights
Wisconsin has a strong tradition of public protest, from the progressive era through the 2011 Capitol protests. Both protesters and observers have the right to record during public demonstrations. This includes:
- Recording your own participation in a protest
- Filming other protesters (in public)
- Recording police responses to protests
- Livestreaming demonstrations
- Photographing confrontations between protesters and counter-protesters
Observer Rights
Journalists, legal observers, and bystanders have the same recording rights as protesters. You do not need a press credential to record a public protest. The Seventh Circuit has recognized that the right to record government officials (including police at protests) is protected by the First Amendment.
Police Restrictions at Protests
Police may establish reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions at protests, but they cannot:
- Ban recording entirely
- Search a camera's or phone's contents without a warrant, though they may lawfully seize the device itself incident to a lawful arrest (per Riley v. California, 573 U.S. 373 (2014))
- Arrest people solely for filming
- Order people to stop recording from a lawful vantage point
- Target people for arrest because they are recording
Police can order people to move back from an active confrontation for safety reasons, establish perimeters around dangerous areas, and enforce unlawful assembly orders that apply to everyone equally.
Photography in Public
Street Photography Rights
Street photography is legal in Wisconsin. You can photograph:
- People in public places without their consent
- Buildings, monuments, and public art
- Storefronts and business exteriors
- License plates and vehicles on public roads
- Public events and gatherings
You do not need a model release to take someone's photograph in a public place. However, using someone's image for commercial purposes (advertising, product endorsement) without their consent may create liability under Wisconsin's right of publicity protections.
Photographing Children in Public
Photographing children in public spaces is legal in Wisconsin, as there is no law prohibiting photography of minors in public. However, photographing children in ways that could be considered obscene or exploitative could trigger criminal charges under separate statutes. Parents may ask you to stop photographing their children, and while you have no legal obligation to comply in a public space, respecting such requests is a common courtesy.
Recording on Private Property Open to the Public
Stores, Restaurants, and Businesses
Privately owned businesses that are open to the public can set their own recording policies. Common approaches include:
- No restrictions. Many businesses do not restrict recording.
- Photography prohibited. Some businesses post "no photography" or "no recording" signs.
- Recording permitted in some areas. A business may allow recording in public areas but restrict it in back offices or employee-only areas.
If a business asks you to stop recording, you must comply or leave. Continuing to record after being asked to stop and refusing to leave could result in a trespassing charge under Wis. Stat. 943.13.
Museums, Theaters, and Venues
Many museums, theaters, concert venues, and event spaces prohibit recording as a condition of entry. When you purchase a ticket or enter the venue, you agree to their terms. Violating these rules can result in ejection from the venue.
Some venues allow personal photography but prohibit commercial recording or use of professional equipment. Check the venue's policy before bringing camera equipment.
Audio Recording in Public
The Wiretapping Statute and Public Conversations
While video recording in public is broadly permitted, audio recording requires additional analysis under Wis. Stat. 968.31. Key principles:
- Conversations at normal volume in public generally carry no expectation of privacy. Recording them is unlikely to violate the wiretapping statute.
- Conversations you participate in are always legal to record under one-party consent, regardless of location.
- Whispered or private conversations between other people in a public place may carry some expectation of privacy. Using sensitive equipment to capture such conversations could raise legal issues.
- Public speeches, performances, and announcements have no expectation of privacy and can be freely recorded.
Practical Guidelines
When recording audio in public:
- If you are part of the conversation, you are always covered by one-party consent
- If you are recording ambient audio in a public space (street sounds, crowd noise), this is generally not an interception of private communications
- If you intentionally use equipment to eavesdrop on a specific private conversation in public, this could violate the wiretapping statute
Drone Recording in Public
Drone operators recording in public spaces must comply with both federal FAA regulations and Wisconsin law:
- FAA rules require registration for drones over 0.55 pounds, prohibit flying above 400 feet in uncontrolled airspace, and restrict flying near airports
- Wisconsin law has a drone-specific surveillance statute: Wis. Stat. 942.10 makes it a Class A misdemeanor to use a drone with intent to photograph, record, or observe another person in a place where that person has a reasonable expectation of privacy. Separately, flying a drone to capture footage from inside or directly over private property can also implicate Wis. Stat. 942.08
- Local ordinances in some Wisconsin cities restrict drone operation in parks, near public buildings, or in congested areas
When Someone Confronts You About Recording
Know Your Rights
If someone confronts you about recording in public:
- Stay calm and polite. De-escalate the situation.
- Know that in public, you have the right to record. You can politely explain this.
- Do not give up your device. No private citizen has the right to take your phone or camera.
- Move away if the situation becomes hostile. Your safety is more important than any recording.
- Call police if threatened. Threats or physical attacks over recording are criminal offenses.
When to Stop Recording
Consider stopping your recording when:
- A property owner asks you to stop on their private property
- Continuing to record would put you in physical danger
- You are in a restricted area (courtroom without permission, military installation, etc.)
- An emergency responder gives a lawful order related to safety
More Wisconsin Recording Laws
Audio Recording | Video Recording | Voyeurism & Hidden Cameras | Workplace Recording | Recording Police | Phone Call Recording | Security Cameras | Recording in Public | Landlord-Tenant | Dashcam Laws | Schools | Medical Recording
Back to Wisconsin Recording Laws
More Wisconsin Recording Topics
More Wisconsin Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I record people in public in Wisconsin?
Yes. There is no expectation of privacy in public places in Wisconsin. You can photograph and video record people on public streets, sidewalks, parks, and other public areas without their consent. The First Amendment protects this right for everyone, not just journalists.
Can I record a government meeting in Wisconsin?
Yes. Wisconsin's Open Meetings Law (Wis. Stat. 19.81) requires most government meetings to be open to the public and recognizes the public's right to record these meetings. This applies to county boards, city councils, school boards, and other governmental bodies.
Can a store kick me out for recording in Wisconsin?
Yes. Private businesses can set their own recording policies. If a store asks you to stop recording and you refuse, you can be asked to leave. Refusing to leave after being asked can result in a trespassing charge under Wis. Stat. 943.13.
Can I record a protest in Wisconsin?
Yes. Both protesters and observers have the right to record public demonstrations. Police cannot ban recording or arrest you solely for filming, and under Riley v. California they need a warrant to search the contents of a seized device. However, you must comply with lawful safety orders and cannot obstruct police operations.
Is street photography legal in Wisconsin?
Yes. You can photograph people, buildings, and activities in public places without consent. You do not need a model release for photos taken in public. However, using someone's image for commercial purposes like advertising without their consent may create separate legal liability.
Updates
Fixed two dead Open Meetings Law citation links, corrected the $25-$300 forfeiture penalty's statute citation from Wis. Stat. 19.97 to the correct 19.96, and fixed a passage that incorrectly said police cannot confiscate a camera or phone without a warrant (Riley v. California requires a warrant to search a lawfully seized device's contents, not to seize the device).
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Wisconsin Statutes, Chapter 968: Commencement Of Criminal Proceedings
§ 968.31Interception and disclosure of wire, electronic or oral communications prohibited.In forcecited in 22 of our articles
(1) Except as otherwise specifically provided in ss. 196.63 or 968.28 to 968.30, whoever commits any of the acts enumerated in this section is guilty of a Class H felony: (a) Intentionally intercepts, attempts to intercept or procures any other person to intercept or attempt to intercept, any wire, electronic or oral communication. (b) Intentionally uses, attempts to use or procures any other person to use or attempt to use any electronic, mechanical or other device to intercept any oral communication. (c) Discloses, or attempts to disclose, to any other person the contents of any wire, electronic or oral communication, knowing or having reason to know that the information was obtained through the interception of a wire, electronic or oral communication in violation of this section or under circumstances constituting violation of this section. (d) Uses, or attempts to use, the contents of any wire, electronic or oral communication, knowing or having reason to know that the information was obtained through the interception of a wire, electronic or oral communication in violation of this section or under circumstances constituting violation of this section.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
Cited in 23 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):State v. Maloney held recordings made with one party's prior consent fall under Section 968.31(2)(b) and (c), and that aiding a police sting is not an "injurious act." State v. Gilmore pointed to 968.31(2m) damages and 968.31(1)(e) penalties, reserving suppression for illegal interceptions.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Maloney (Wisconsin Supreme Court 2005, 281 Wis. 2d 595)✓A homicide suspect's girlfriend let police record her hotel room conversations with him in Las Vegas; the court held the videotapes lawful under 968.31(2)(b) and (c) because she was a consenting party, and that helping a lawful sting is not an injurious act.
- State v. Popenhagen (Wisconsin Supreme Court 2008, 309 Wis. 2d 601)“…Arnold, 51 Wis.2d at 442 , 187 N.W.2d 354 (citing Wis. Stat. § 968.31 (2)(b)). However, in considering all th…”
- State v. Gilmore (Wisconsin Supreme Court 1996, 201 Wis. 2d 820)✓Prosecutors filed a public complaint quoting 27 pages of lawfully wiretapped calls; the court held the unsealed filing violated the surveillance law but refused suppression, pointing to the civil action in 968.31(2m) and the criminal penalty in 968.31(1)(e) as the remedies.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: One-Party Consent States: Complete 2026 Guide, Wisconsin Security Camera Laws: Home, Business, and HOA Rules (2026), Wisconsin Video Recording Laws: Surveillance, Filming, and Privacy Rules (2026)
Wisconsin Statutes, Chapter 165: Department Of Justice
§ 165.87Body cameras and law enforcement.In forcecited in 7 of our articles
(1) If a law enforcement agency uses a body camera on a law enforcement officer, the law enforcement agency shall do all of the following: (a) Administer a written policy regarding all of the following: 1. The use, maintenance, and storage of body cameras and data recorded by the body cameras. 2. Any limitations the law enforcement agency imposes on which law enforcement officers may wear a body camera. 3. Any limitations the law enforcement agency imposes on situations, persons, or encounters that may be recorded by a body camera. (b) Train all law enforcement officers wearing a body camera on the policy under par. (a) and on the requirements under sub. (2). (c) Train all employees that use, maintain, store, or release data from a body camera on the policy under par. (a) and on the requirements under subs. (2) and (3). (d) Periodically review practices regarding the body cameras and data from body cameras to ensure compliance with the policy under par. (a) and the requirements under subs. (2) and (3). (e) If the law enforcement agency maintains an Internet site or has an Internet site maintained on its behalf, make the policy under par.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2022
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Pressley v. City of South Milwaukee (District Court, E.D. Wisconsin 2022)“…3. The plaintiff argues that the defendants have relied on Wis. Stat. §165.87(3)(c) to avoid giving him the body came…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Wisconsin Police Body Camera Laws: Wis. Stat. 165.87, Wisconsin Recording Laws (2026): One-Party Consent Rules, Wisconsin Laws on Recording Police: Your Rights and Limitations (2026)
Wisconsin Statutes, Chapter 19: General Duties Of Public Officials
§ 19.81Declaration of policy.In forcecited in 3 of our articles
(1) In recognition of the fact that a representative government of the American type is dependent upon an informed electorate, it is declared to be the policy of this state that the public is entitled to the fullest and most complete information regarding the affairs of government as is compatible with the conduct of governmental business. (2) To implement and ensure the public policy herein expressed, all meetings of all state and local governmental bodies shall be publicly held in places reasonably accessible to members of the public and shall be open to all citizens at all times unless otherwise expressly provided by law. (3) In conformance with article IV, section 10, of the constitution, which states that the doors of each house shall remain open, except when the public welfare requires secrecy, it is declared to be the intent of the legislature to comply to the fullest extent with this subchapter.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
Also relied on in: Wisconsin School Recording Laws: Student, Parent, and Teacher Rights (2026)
§ 19.97Enforcement.In force
(1) This subchapter shall be enforced in the name and on behalf of the state by the attorney general or, upon the verified complaint of any person, by the district attorney of any county wherein a violation may occur. In actions brought by the attorney general, the court shall award any forfeiture recovered together with reasonable costs to the state; and in actions brought by the district attorney, the court shall award any forfeiture recovered together with reasonable costs to the county. (2) In addition and supplementary to the remedy provided in s. 19.96, the attorney general or the district attorney may commence an action, separately or in conjunction with an action brought under s. 19.96, to obtain such other legal or equitable relief, including but not limited to mandamus, injunction or declaratory judgment, as may be appropriate under the circumstances. (3) Any action taken at a meeting of a governmental body held in violation of this subchapter is voidable, upon action brought by the attorney general or the district attorney of the county wherein the violation occurred.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
Wisconsin Statutes, Chapter 942: Crimes Against Reputation, Privacy And Civil Liberties
§ 942.08Invasion of privacy.In forcecited in 13 of our articles
(1) In this section: (a) “Nude or partially nude person” means any human being who has less than fully and opaquely covered genitals, pubic area or buttocks, any female human being who has less than a fully opaque covering over any portion of a breast below the top of the nipple, or any male human being with covered genitals in a discernibly turgid state. (b) “Private place” means a place where a person may reasonably expect to be safe from being observed without his or her knowledge and consent. (c) “Surveillance device” means any device, instrument, apparatus, implement, mechanism or contrivance used, designed to be used to observe, or capable of observing, the activities of a person. “Surveillance device” includes a peephole. (2) Except as provided in sub. (4), whoever does any of the following is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor: (a) Knowingly installs a surveillance device in any private place, or uses a surveillance device to observe in a private place, with the intent to observe any nude or partially nude person without the consent of the person observed.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
Cited in 7 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Wisconsin courts have applied Wis. Stat. 942.08 to hidden surveillance of nudity. Gillund v. Meridian Mutual Insurance (2009) concluded that secretly videotaping a houseguest violated 942.08(2) and that, unlike the civil privacy statute, it requires specific intent. State v. Jahnke (2008) described 942.08 as addressing live viewing.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Gillund v. Meridian Mutual Insurance (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin 2009, 323 Wis. 2d 1)✓An uncle secretly videotaped his niece undressed in his home; applying Wis. Stat. 942.08(2) (1999-2000), the court held his admitted conduct violated the criminal invasion of privacy statute even though he was never convicted, so the penal-law exclusion barred coverage.
- State v. Culver (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin 2018, 384 Wis. 2d 222)✓Convicted of posting nude photos of a woman online, Culver attacked the definition of "nude or partially nude person" that the post-or-publish statute borrows from Wis. Stat. 942.08(1)(a); the court declined to analyze it in detail and said it reasonably tracked common usage.
- State v. Jahnke (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin 2008, 316 Wis. 2d 324)“…nces. As the State points out, at least one other statute, Wis. Stat. § 942.08 , our "Peeping Tom" law, addresses live…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Wisconsin Landlord-Tenant Recording Laws: Cameras, Surveillance, and Privacy (2026), Wisconsin Medical Recording Laws: Patient Rights, HIPAA, and Consent (2026), Wisconsin Voyeurism and Hidden Camera Laws: Privacy Crimes and Penalties (2026)
§ 942.10Use of a drone.In forcecited in 5 of our articles
Whoever uses a drone, as defined in s. 175.55 (1) (a), with the intent to photograph, record, or otherwise observe another individual in a place or location where the individual has a reasonable expectation of privacy is guilty of Class A misdemeanor. This section does not apply to a law enforcement officer authorized to use a drone pursuant to s. 175.55 (2).
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
Also relied on in: Wisconsin Drone Laws (2026): Privacy, Warrants & New Rules, Is It Illegal to Video Record Someone Without Their Consent? (2026)
Wisconsin Statutes, Chapter 943: Crimes Against Property
§ 943.13Trespass to land.In forcecited in 3 of our articles
(1e) In this section: (aL) “Carry” has the meaning given in s. 175.60 (1) (ag). (ar) “Dwelling unit” means a structure or that part of a structure which is used or intended to be used as a home, residence or sleeping place by one person or by 2 or more persons maintaining a common household, to the exclusion of all others. (az) “Implied consent” means conduct or words or both that imply that an owner or occupant of land has given consent to another person to enter the land. (b) “Inholding” means a parcel of land that is private property and that is surrounded completely by land owned by the United States, by this state or by a local governmental unit or any combination of the United States, this state and a local governmental unit. (bm) “Licensee” means a licensee, as defined in s. 175.60 (1) (d), or an out-of-state licensee, as defined in s. 175.60 (1) (g). (c) “Local governmental unit” means a political subdivision of this state, a special purpose district in this state, an instrumentality or corporation of the political subdivision or special purpose district or a combination or subunit of any of the foregoing.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
Cited in 8 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2022
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Vincent Milewski v. Town of Dover (Wisconsin Supreme Court 2017)“…they enter a home without consent. See Wis. Stat. § 943.13(4m)(am)4. (no trespass e…”
- Danelle Duncan v. Asset Recovery Specialists, Inc. (Wisconsin Supreme Court 2022, 400 Wis. 2d 1)“…rs.[9] The court also considered part of the criminal code, Wis. Stat. § 943.13, "Trespass to Land," that defines "dwel…”
- Jacque v. Steenberg Homes, Inc. (Wisconsin Supreme Court 1997, 209 Wis. 2d 605)“…lfpenny, and the possibility of a Class B forfeiture under Wis. Stat. § 943.13 . We conclude that both the private lan…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Wisconsin Statutes, Chapter 947: Crimes Against Public Peace, Order And Other Interests
§ 947.013Harassment.In forcecited in 3 of our articles
(1) In this section: (a) “Course of conduct” means a pattern of conduct composed of a series of acts over a period of time, however short, evidencing a continuity of purpose. (b) “Credible threat” means a threat made with the intent and apparent ability to carry out the threat. (c) “Personally identifiable information” has the meaning given in s. 19.62 (5). (d) “Record” has the meaning given in s. 19.32 (2). (1m) Whoever, with intent to harass or intimidate another person, does any of the following is subject to a Class B forfeiture: (a) Strikes, shoves, kicks or otherwise subjects the person to physical contact or attempts or threatens to do the same. (b) Engages in a course of conduct or repeatedly commits acts which harass or intimidate the person and which serve no legitimate purpose. (1r) Whoever violates sub. (1m) under all of the following circumstances is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor: (a) The act is accompanied by a credible threat that places the victim in reasonable fear of death or great bodily harm. (b) The act occurs while the actor is subject to an order or injunction under s.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
Cited in 9 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Welytok v. Ziolkowski (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin 2008, 312 Wis. 2d 435)“…ose and that his conduct did harass Jill. See Wis. Stat. § 947.013 (lm)(b) (2005-06). 3 Ziolk…”
- State v. Schwebke (Wisconsin Supreme Court 2002, 253 Wis. 2d 1)“…could have sought a civil forfeiture for harassment under Wis. Stat. § 947.013 . A harassment conviction would have su…”
- State v. Sveum (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin 2002, 254 Wis. 2d 868)“…32 (2m) (1995-96); 1 harassment, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 947.013 (lr); violating a harassment injunction…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Wisconsin Audio Recording Laws: One-Party Consent Rules and Penalties (2026)
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Wis. Stat. 19.81 - Open Meetings Law(docs.legis.wisconsin.gov).gov
- Wis. Stat. 19.97 - Penalties(docs.legis.wisconsin.gov).gov
- Wis. Stat. 968.31 - Wiretapping(docs.legis.wisconsin.gov).gov
- Wis. Stat. 942.08 - Invasion of Privacy(docs.legis.wisconsin.gov).gov
- Wis. Stat. 943.13 - Trespass(docs.legis.wisconsin.gov).gov
- Wisconsin DOJ(doj.state.wi.us).gov
- FAA Drone Rules(faa.gov).gov
- Wisconsin State Law Library(wilawlibrary.gov).gov
- Wis. Stat. 942.10 - Drone Surveillance (Class A misdemeanor)(docs.legis.wisconsin.gov).gov