EnglishEspañol
Wisconsin flag

Wisconsin

Wisconsin Laws on Recording Police: Your Rights and Limitations (2026)

Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 15, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 15, 2026. · 5 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Wisconsin Laws on Recording Police: Your Rights and Limitations (2026)

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I legally record police officers in Wisconsin?

Yes. The First Amendment protects your right to record police officers performing their duties in public places. The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, which covers Wisconsin, has recognized this right. You can record traffic stops, arrests, and other police activities from a safe distance without interfering.

Can a police officer make me delete my recording in Wisconsin?

No. Officers cannot order you to delete footage or photos. The U.S. Supreme Court held in Riley v. California (2014) that police generally need a warrant to search a cell phone's contents, even though they may lawfully seize the device itself incident to an arrest. Demanding deletion of recordings is not a lawful order.

Can I be arrested for recording police in Wisconsin?

You cannot be lawfully arrested solely for recording police in public. However, if your recording activity interferes with police operations, obstructs an officer, or involves trespassing, you could face charges for those separate offenses. Always maintain a safe distance and comply with lawful orders.

Do Wisconsin police have to wear body cameras?

Wisconsin does not require police officers to wear body cameras. However, Wis. Stat. 165.87 requires any law enforcement agency that chooses to use body cameras to adopt a written policy covering activation, retention, access, and disclosure. Most major agencies in Wisconsin have adopted body cameras voluntarily.

How do I get police body camera footage in Wisconsin?

Submit a written open records request to the law enforcement agency under Wisconsin's Open Records Law (Wis. Stat. 19.31-19.39). The agency must respond within a reasonable time. They may redact portions involving active investigations, crime victims, or minors, and must provide specific reasons for any denial.

Updates

Corrected three passages that inverted the Riley v. California rule (police may lawfully seize a phone or camera incident to an arrest, but need a warrant to search its stored contents) and fixed a dead Wisconsin Open Records Law citation link.

Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes

Governing law re-checked for recent changes

Corrected the body-camera statute citation from Wis. Stat. 175.47 (which actually governs officer-involved death investigations) to the real body-camera statute, Wis. Stat. 165.87, verified against the official Wisconsin Legislature text.

Corrected the Sources box entry that still cited Wis. Stat. 175.47 as the body-camera statute to the real body-camera statute, Wis. Stat. 165.87, matching the body-text correction already applied.

Governing law re-checked for recent changes

Reviewed and approved by an editor

Sources and References

  1. Wis. Stat. 165.87 - Body Cameras(docs.legis.wisconsin.gov).gov
  2. Wis. Stat. 968.31 - Interception and Disclosure(docs.legis.wisconsin.gov).gov
  3. Wis. Stat. 19.31 - Open Records Law(docs.legis.wisconsin.gov).gov
  4. 42 U.S.C. 1983 - Civil Rights(law.cornell.edu)
  5. ACLU of Wisconsin - Recording Police(aclu-wi.org)
  6. U.S. DOJ - Civil Rights Division(justice.gov).gov
  7. Wisconsin Courts(wicourts.gov).gov
  8. Riley v. California, 573 U.S. 373 (2014)(law.cornell.edu)
Share: