Wisconsin
Wisconsin Drone Laws (2026): Privacy, Warrants & New Rules
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 17, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 17, 2026. · 6 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Wisconsin criminalizes flying a drone to spy on someone, requires police to get a warrant before using one to gather evidence, and, as of April 2026, bans low flights over schools in session and utility infrastructure.
This guide is part of our Drone Laws by State series.
Jurisdiction scope: This article addresses Wisconsin state law governing drones: the civilian privacy offense in section 942.10, the law-enforcement warrant requirement in section 175.55, the hunter-harassment and weaponization statutes, the 2025 school and utility-facility rules, the limit on local drone ordinances in section 114.105, and the federal shoot-down prohibition. It does not address FAA registration, Remote ID, or Part 107 licensing, which apply the same way nationwide; see the Drone Laws by State hub for that baseline and how other states compare.
FAA airspace rules and Wisconsin conduct rules answer different questions
The FAA is the exclusive regulator of where a drone may fly nationally, through registration, Remote Pilot Certification under 14 CFR Part 107 for most non-hobby flights, and Remote ID broadcast requirements. Wisconsin has instead built one of the more layered state drone codes in the country on top of that federal baseline, covering what an operator does with the footage or data, when police need a warrant, and where a drone may not go at all. Six separate statutes now touch drones in Wisconsin: sections 942.10, 175.55, 29.083, 941.292, 114.045, which dates to 2015 and was expanded in 2025, and 114.105. Together they place Wisconsin among the more privacy-protective states nationally on this topic.
Those rules are set at the state level, and local government has almost no room to add to them. Wis. Stat. section 114.105(4)(b) provides that, except as provided in subsection (3), no political subdivision may regulate the ownership or operation of a drone. Subsection (3) lets a city, village, town, or county enact an ordinance limiting its own use of drones, which is the narrow exception the preemption clause preserves. Section 114.105(4)(a) separately bars any local ordinance governing aircraft or aeronautics that is contrary to or inconsistent with chapter 114 or federal law. So a municipal drone ordinance aimed at how residents or businesses fly is outside a Wisconsin political subdivision's authority.

Can your neighbor legally fly a drone over your house in Wisconsin?
Not to observe you. Wis. Stat. section 942.10 makes it a Class A misdemeanor, the most serious misdemeanor tier in Wisconsin, to use a drone with the intent to photograph, record, or otherwise observe another individual in a place or location where that individual has a reasonable expectation of privacy. A conviction carries up to nine months in jail and a $10,000 fine. The statute turns on intent to surveil, not on the mere fact that a drone crossed above the property; a drone incidentally passing overhead is not, by itself, a violation. The statute exempts law enforcement officers authorized to use a drone under section 175.55, discussed below, so an officer acting within that statute's rules is not separately liable under the general privacy offense.
Does Wisconsin police need a warrant to fly a drone over your property?
Generally yes. Wis. Stat. section 175.55(2) prohibits any Wisconsin law enforcement agency from using a drone to gather evidence or other information in a criminal investigation from a place where an individual has a reasonable expectation of privacy without first obtaining a search warrant under section 968.12. The statute carves out five exceptions: use in a public place, assisting an active search-and-rescue operation, locating an escaped prisoner, surveilling a location to execute an arrest warrant, and situations where an officer has reasonable suspicion that drone use is necessary to prevent imminent danger to a person or imminent destruction of evidence. Outside those five circumstances, evidence a Wisconsin agency gathers by drone from a place carrying a reasonable expectation of privacy requires a warrant to be lawfully obtained.
Drones and hunting: Wisconsin's harassment law
Wisconsin is one of a small number of states that names drones directly in its hunter-protection statute. Wis. Stat. section 29.083 bars interfering or attempting to interfere with lawful hunting, fishing, or trapping with intent to prevent the taking of a wild animal, listing specific prohibited acts such as disturbing a hunting blind, disturbing bait, or maintaining physical proximity to a hunter. Subsection (2)(a)8 extends that list to using a drone, defined by cross-reference to section 941.292(1), to conduct any of the same prohibited activities. The statute allows a civil action for an injunction and damages, including punitive damages and reimbursement of costs like license fees, travel, and guide expenses. A 2023 Seventh Circuit decision, Brown v. Kemp, struck down the neighboring clause at section 29.083(2)(a)7, covering photographing and maintaining proximity to a hunter, as facially unconstitutional under the First Amendment. The drone-specific clause at (2)(a)8 was not the provision the court invalidated, but the ruling shows this corner of Wisconsin law is still being tested.
Wisconsin's new 2026 school and utility no-fly rules
Wis. Stat. section 114.045 dates to 2015 Wisconsin Act 318, which banned flying a drone over a Wisconsin correctional institution or its grounds without authorization from the secretary of corrections (for a state facility) or the county sheriff (for a county jail); that rule remains in force today under subsection (1m)(a) and carries the same $5,000 forfeiture penalty as the newer rules below. Two companion 2025 laws, Wisconsin Act 189 and Wisconsin Act 194, expanded section 114.045 to add school and utility-facility no-fly rules. Both were enacted April 3, 2026 and published April 4, 2026, and because neither act prescribes its own effective date, both took effect April 5, 2026 under the default rule in Wis. Stat. section 991.11. The school-property rule bars operating a drone over property owned by a school, or on which a school is located, while the school is open for instruction or hosting a school-board-approved event, unless the school board or its designee authorizes the flight; a school board must respond to an authorization request within five business days. The utility-facility rule separately bars flying a drone at an altitude of less than 300 feet over or within 500 feet of a parcel containing a water reclamation facility, gas or electric power plant, generating station, substation, telecommunications carrier plant, internet or cable service facility, public water system facility, or petroleum refinery. Both parts of that threshold have to be met. The altitude limit is an element of the offense, not an alternative to the distance limit, so a flight that stays at or above 300 feet is outside the rule even when it passes directly over a covered parcel.
| Restriction | Threshold | Exceptions | Penalty |
|---|---|---|---|
| Correctional institutions (114.045(1m)(a)) | No fly over the institution or its grounds | Authorization from the secretary of corrections (state facility) or county sheriff (county jail) | Forfeiture up to $5,000 |
| School property (114.045(1m)(b)) | No fly during instruction or approved events | School board authorization; limited law-enforcement purposes | Forfeiture up to $5,000 |
| Utility facilities (114.045(1e)) | Below 300 ft in altitude and over or within 500 ft of covered parcel | Facility owner/operator; local government; FAA-compliant commercial use | Forfeiture up to $5,000 |
Shooting down a drone in Wisconsin
Even where a drone is violating section 942.10's privacy rule or the new facility restrictions, Wisconsin law gives a resident no authority to shoot it down or otherwise disable it. 18 U.S.C. section 32, the Aircraft Sabotage Act, makes it a federal felony, punishable by up to twenty years in prison, to willfully damage, destroy, or disable an aircraft, and the FAA has classified drones as aircraft within the National Airspace System since 2012. That exposure applies even over the shooter's own property, because the FAA, not the landowner, controls the airspace. Separately, operating a weaponized drone is already a Class H felony in Wisconsin under section 941.292, regardless of who is on the receiving end.
Disclaimer
This article provides general legal information about Wisconsin law governing drones, as verified on 2026-07-09. It does not constitute legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Readers should consult a lawyer licensed in Wisconsin for advice about a specific incident or dispute.
Related articles
Last updated: 2026-07-09. Statutes cited reflect their in-force version as of 2026-07-09.
More Wisconsin Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Is it illegal for a drone to fly over my house in Wisconsin?
Not automatically. Wis. Stat. section 942.10 only applies when the operator intends to photograph, record, or otherwise observe you in a place where you have a reasonable expectation of privacy. A drone simply passing overhead is not, by itself, a violation.
Does Wisconsin police need a warrant to use a drone?
Generally yes. Wis. Stat. section 175.55 requires a search warrant before a Wisconsin law enforcement agency can use a drone to gather evidence from a place where someone has a reasonable expectation of privacy, subject to five exceptions including active search-and-rescue and imminent-danger situations.
Can I fly a drone near my kid's school in Wisconsin?
Not while it is in session or hosting an approved event. Wis. Stat. section 114.045, effective April 5, 2026, bars drone flights over school property during instructional periods or approved events without the school board's authorization.
How close can a drone fly to a power plant in Wisconsin?
The utility-facility rule in Wis. Stat. section 114.045, effective April 5, 2026, reaches a flight only when both conditions are met: the drone is at an altitude of less than 300 feet and it is over or within 500 feet of the parcel. A flight at or above 300 feet is outside the rule. Exceptions cover the facility owner or operator, a local government, and FAA-compliant commercial use.
Do Wisconsin cities and counties have their own drone ordinances?
They generally cannot. Wis. Stat. section 114.105(4)(b) provides that, except as provided in subsection (3), no political subdivision may regulate the ownership or operation of a drone. A city, village, town, or county may enact an ordinance limiting its own use of drones, but not one governing how residents or businesses fly.
Is it illegal to use a drone while hunting in Wisconsin?
Using a drone to interfere with someone else's lawful hunting, fishing, or trapping is illegal under Wis. Stat. section 29.083(2)(a)8, which allows the affected hunter or angler to sue for an injunction and damages.
Can I arm my drone in Wisconsin?
No. Wis. Stat. section 941.292 makes operating a weaponized drone a Class H felony, regardless of whether the weapon is discharged.
Can I shoot down a drone flying over my property in Wisconsin?
No Wisconsin law authorizes this, and doing so risks a federal felony charge under 18 U.S.C. section 32 for damaging an aircraft, since the FAA controls the airspace regardless of who owns the land below.
What happened in Brown v. Kemp?
The Seventh Circuit held in 2023 that the clause of Wisconsin's hunter-harassment law barring photographing and maintaining proximity to a hunter, Wis. Stat. section 29.083(2)(a)7, violated the First Amendment. The neighboring drone-specific clause at (2)(a)8 was not the provision the court struck down.
Updates
Corrected the effective date of the 2025 school and utility-facility drone laws to April 5, 2026, clarified that the utility-facility rule applies only to flights that are both below 300 feet and over or within 500 feet of a covered parcel, and added Wisconsin’s statutory bar on local drone ordinances.
Corrected the page to reflect that Wisconsin's drone no-fly statute (section 114.045) originated in 2015 as a correctional-institution ban and was only expanded by the 2025 laws to add school and utility-facility rules, and added the still-active correctional-institution restriction to the statute inventory and restriction table.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected Wis. Stat. section 941.292: the operative statutory text criminalizes OPERATING a weaponized drone, not merely arming or equipping one, so the article's claim was narrowed to what the statute text actually confirms, in the KeyTakeaways, body prose, and the FAQ answer.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Wisconsin Statutes, Chapter 942: Crimes Against Reputation, Privacy And Civil Liberties
§ 942.10Use of a drone.In forcecited in 5 of our articles
Whoever uses a drone, as defined in s. 175.55 (1) (a), with the intent to photograph, record, or otherwise observe another individual in a place or location where the individual has a reasonable expectation of privacy is guilty of Class A misdemeanor. This section does not apply to a law enforcement officer authorized to use a drone pursuant to s. 175.55 (2).
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
Also relied on in: Wisconsin Laws on Recording in Public: Filming, Photography, and Privacy (2026), Wisconsin Video Recording Laws: Surveillance, Filming, and Privacy Rules (2026), Wisconsin Recording Laws (2026): One-Party Consent Rules
Wisconsin Statutes, Chapter 175: Miscellaneous Police Provisions
§ 175.55Use of drones restricted.In force
(1) In this section: (a) “Drone” has the meaning given in s. 114.105 (1) (a). (b) “Wisconsin law enforcement agency” has the meaning given in s. 165.77 (1) (c) and includes the department of justice and a tribal law enforcement agency. (2) No Wisconsin law enforcement agency may use a drone to gather evidence or other information in a criminal investigation from or at a place or location where an individual has a reasonable expectation of privacy without first obtaining a search warrant under s. 968.12. This subsection does not apply to the use of a drone in a public place or to assist in an active search and rescue operation, to locate an escaped prisoner, to surveil a place or location for the purpose of executing an arrest warrant, or if a law enforcement officer has reasonable suspicion to believe that the use of a drone is necessary to prevent imminent danger to an individual or to prevent imminent destruction of evidence.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
Wisconsin Statutes, Chapter 114: Aeronautics And Astronautics
§ 114.045Limitation on the operation of drones.In force
(1b) In this section: (a) “Private school” has the meaning given in s. 115.001 (3r). (b) “Public protective services agency” means a law enforcement agency, a tribal law enforcement agency, or a fire protection or emergency medical services agency. (c) “Public school” means an elementary or high school. “Public school” includes a charter school. (d) “School” means a public school, private school, or tribal school. (e) “Tribal school” has the meaning given in s. 115.001 (15m). (1e) (a) In this subsection: 114.045 Note 1. “Facility” does not include an electric transmission line or any other equipment or structure used solely to carry electric power or another product. 2. “Management” means operations related to the generation or delivery of the service or product provided. “Management” does not include sales of the service or product or administration of the entity providing the service or product. (am) Except as provided in par. (b) or (c), no person may operate a drone, as defined in s. 941.292 (1), at an altitude of less than 300 feet, over or within 500 feet of a parcel on which of any of the following facilities are located: 114.045 Note 1.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
Wisconsin Statutes, Chapter 941: Crimes Against Public Health And Safety
§ 941.292Possession of a weaponized drone.In force
(1) In this section, “drone” means a powered, aerial vehicle that does not carry a human operator, uses aerodynamic forces to provide vehicle lift, and can fly autonomously or be piloted remotely. A drone may be expendable or recoverable. (2) Whoever operates any weaponized drone is guilty of a Class H felony. This subsection does not apply to a member of the U.S. armed forces or national guard acting in his or her official capacity.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
Wisconsin Statutes, Chapter 29: Wild Animals And Plants
§ 29.083Interference with hunting, fishing or trapping.In force
(1) Definition. In this section, “activity associated with lawful hunting, fishing, or trapping” means travel, camping, scouting, target shooting, dog training, animal baiting or feeding, or other acts that are preparatory to lawful hunting, fishing, or trapping and that are done by a hunter, fisher, or trapper or by a member of a hunting, fishing, or trapping party. (2) Prohibitions. (a) No person may interfere or attempt to interfere with lawful hunting, fishing, or trapping with the intent to prevent the taking of a wild animal, or intentionally interfere with or intentionally attempt to interfere with an activity associated with lawful hunting, fishing, or trapping, by doing any of the following: 1. Harassing a wild animal or by engaging in an activity that tends to harass wild animals. 2. Impeding or obstructing a person who is engaged in lawful hunting, fishing or trapping. 3. Impeding or obstructing a person who is engaged in an activity associated with lawful hunting, fishing or trapping. 4. Disturbing the personal property of a person engaged in lawful hunting, fishing or trapping. 5. Disturbing a lawfully placed hunting blind or stand. 6.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
United States Code Title 18
§ 32Destruction of aircraft or aircraft facilitiesIn forcecited in 51 of our articles
Whoever willfully— sets fire to, damages, destroys, disables, or wrecks any aircraft in the special aircraft jurisdiction of the United States or any civil aircraft used, operated, or employed in interstate, overseas, or foreign air commerce; places or causes to be placed a destructive device or substance in, upon, or in proximity to, or otherwise makes or causes to be made unworkable or unusable or hazardous to work or use, any such aircraft, or any part or other materials used or intended to be used in connection with the operation of such aircraft, if such placing or causing to be placed or such making or causing to be made is likely to endanger the safety of any such aircraft; sets fire to, damages, destroys, or disables any air navigation facility, or interferes by force or violence with the operation of such facility, if such fire, damaging, destroying, disabling, or interfering is likely to endanger the safety of any such aircraft in flight; with the intent to damage, destroy, or disable any such aircraft, sets fire to, damages, destroys, or disables or places a destructive device or substance in, upon, or in proximity to, any appliance or structure, ramp, landing area,…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 168 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):United States v. Yousef (2003) applied 18 U.S.C. 32 to an overseas airline bombing plot, holding Section 32(a) reaches conduct abroad because US-flag aircraft in flight are within the special aircraft jurisdiction, and that a defendant brought here involuntarily is still found in the United States under Section 32(b).
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Perez v. United States (Supreme Court of the United States 1971, 402 U.S. 146)“…commerce, as, for example, the destruction of an aircraft ( 18 U. S. C. § 32 ), or persons or things in commerce, as…”
- Stanford v. Kentucky (Supreme Court of the United States 1989, 492 U.S. 361)“…r by persons subject to Uniform Code of Military Justice); 18 U. S. C. §§ 32 , 33, and 34 (1982 ed. and Supp. V) (de…”
- United States v. Yousef (Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit 2003, 327 F.3d 56)✓Yousef bombed a Philippine airliner and plotted to bomb twelve US flag airliners on Asian routes; the court held Section 32(a) reaches attacks on US flag aircraft worldwide, and that Yousef, brought here involuntarily, was found in the United States under Section 32(b).
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: California Drone Laws (2026): Privacy, Fires & Shoot-Down Rules, Oregon Drone Laws 2026: Police Warrants, Privacy & Penalties, Connecticut Drone Laws (2026): Privacy & Penalties
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Wis. Stat. section 942.10, use of a drone(docs.legis.wisconsin.gov).gov
- Wis. Stat. section 175.55, regulation of use of unmanned aerial vehicles by law enforcement agencies(docs.legis.wisconsin.gov).gov
- Wis. Stat. section 29.083, interference with hunting, fishing or trapping(docs.legis.wisconsin.gov).gov
- Wis. Stat. section 941.292, possession or use of a weaponized drone(docs.legis.wisconsin.gov).gov
- Wis. Stat. section 114.045, operation of a drone over school property and near certain facilities (2025 Wisconsin Act 189; 2025 Wisconsin Act 194)(docs.legis.wisconsin.gov).gov
- Brown v. Kemp, 86 F.4th 745 (7th Cir. 2023)(media.ca7.uscourts.gov).gov
- 18 U.S.C. section 32, Aircraft Sabotage Act (destruction of aircraft or aircraft facilities)(law.cornell.edu)
- Wis. Stat. section 114.105, local regulation of aeronautics and drones (preemption at sub. (4)(b))(docs.legis.wisconsin.gov)
- Wis. Stat. section 991.11, effective date of acts (day after date of publication absent an express effective date)(docs.legis.wisconsin.gov)
- 2025 Wisconsin Act 189 (enacted April 3, 2026; published April 4, 2026)(docs.legis.wisconsin.gov)
- 2025 Wisconsin Act 194 (enacted April 3, 2026; published April 4, 2026)(docs.legis.wisconsin.gov)