Hawaii
Hawaii Voyeurism Laws: Hidden Camera Penalties and Privacy Protections
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 15, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 15, 2026. · 6 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content
Hawaii criminalizes voyeurism and hidden camera recording under two statutes. HRS 711-1110.9 makes non-consensual intimate image recording a Class C felony carrying up to 5 years in prison, while HRS 711-1111 treats hidden cameras in private places as a misdemeanor punishable by up to 1 year in jail.
Hawaii has some of the strongest voyeurism and hidden camera laws in the United States. The state addresses voyeurism primarily through two statutes: HRS 711-1110.9 (violation of privacy in the first degree) and HRS 711-1111 (violation of privacy in the second degree). These statutes have been strengthened multiple times through legislative action to address emerging threats like revenge pornography and AI-generated deepfake images.
This guide explains what constitutes voyeurism under Hawaii law, the penalties for different offenses, how the law addresses revenge porn and deepfakes, and what protections are available to victims.
Violation of Privacy in the First Degree: HRS 711-1110.9
What the Statute Prohibits
HRS 711-1110.9 is Hawaii's primary voyeurism statute. A person commits violation of privacy in the first degree by engaging in any of the following conduct:
Non-consensual intimate image recording. A person commits this offense by recording another person in a state of undress or engaging in sexual conduct in a place and under circumstances where the person has a reasonable expectation of privacy, without that person's consent.
Non-consensual disclosure of intimate images. A person commits this offense by knowingly disclosing an image or video of another identifiable person in the nude or engaging in sexual conduct, without that person's consent, with intent to substantially harm the depicted person or as an act of revenge or retribution. This applies regardless of how or under what circumstances the image was originally obtained, including images that were originally shared consensually.
Threatening to disclose intimate images. Added by Act 114 (2018), a person commits this offense by threatening to disclose an intimate image of another person without that person's consent, for the purpose of intimidation, coercion, or to cause emotional distress.
Deepfake intimate images. Added by Act 59 (2021), a person commits this offense by intentionally creating, disclosing, or threatening to disclose a computer-generated image, also known as a deepfake, that realistically depicts a person nude or engaging in sexual conduct, without that person's consent.
Penalties for First-Degree Violation
Violation of privacy in the first degree is a Class C felony under Hawaii law. The penalties include:
- Imprisonment for an indeterminate term of up to 5 years under HRS 706-660
- Fines up to $10,000
- Probation may be imposed as an alternative to imprisonment
- Sex offender registration may be required depending on the circumstances
Confidentiality and Sealing Requirements
All recordings, images, and other materials that are the subject of a prosecution under HRS 711-1110.9 must be sealed and remain confidential. This protection extends throughout the legal proceedings and is designed to prevent further victimization through public disclosure of intimate images.
Violation of Privacy in the Second Degree: HRS 711-1111
What the Statute Covers
HRS 711-1111 addresses the broader category of privacy violations involving recording devices in private places. A person commits violation of privacy in the second degree if that person:
- Installs or uses a recording device in any private place, without the consent of the person or persons entitled to privacy therein, for the purpose of observing, recording, amplifying, or broadcasting sounds or events in that place
- Covertly photographs, films, or records in a manner that captures an image of another person in a place and under circumstances where the person has a reasonable expectation of privacy
- Covertly records or broadcasts an image of another person's intimate area underneath clothing ("upskirting") by use of any device, while that person is in a public place and without that person's consent
What Qualifies as a "Private Place"
Under HRS 711-1111, a private place is a location where a person "may reasonably expect to be safe from casual or hostile intrusion or surveillance." This does not include places where the public or a substantial group of the public has access.
Locations typically considered private places include:
- Bedrooms and living areas in private homes
- Hotel rooms and vacation rental units
- Bathrooms and restrooms in any setting
- Locker rooms and changing areas
- Medical examination rooms
- Private offices with closed doors
- Dressing rooms in retail stores
Penalties for Second-Degree Violation
Violation of privacy in the second degree is a misdemeanor. Penalties include:
- Up to 1 year in jail under HRS 706-663
- Fines up to $2,000
- Court-ordered destruction of recordings
- Probation
Hidden Camera Laws in Hawaii
Installing Hidden Cameras
Under HRS 711-1111, it is illegal to install any recording device in a private place without the consent of all persons entitled to privacy. This includes:
- Hidden cameras placed in bathrooms, bedrooms, or changing areas
- Nanny cameras or other surveillance devices in private spaces without disclosure
- Cameras disguised as everyday objects (clocks, smoke detectors, picture frames)
- Any device capable of capturing images or video installed covertly in a private area
Specific Hidden Camera Scenarios
In your own home with guests. While you own the property, guests in your home have privacy expectations in certain areas. You cannot place hidden cameras in guest bedrooms, bathrooms, or other areas where guests reasonably expect privacy.
In rental properties. Landlords cannot install hidden cameras inside rental units. This is both a violation of HRS 711-1111 and potentially a violation of tenant rights. (See Hawaii landlord-tenant recording laws for more details.)
In vacation rentals. Hawaii's large vacation rental market makes this particularly relevant. Hosts of vacation rentals (Airbnb, VRBO, etc.) cannot place hidden recording devices inside the rental unit. Any visible security cameras on the exterior should be disclosed in the listing.
In the workplace. Employers cannot install hidden cameras in bathrooms, locker rooms, changing areas, or other private workplace areas. Cameras in common work areas are generally permissible with notice. (See Hawaii workplace recording laws.)
Revenge Pornography Laws
Act 114 (2018)
Hawaii enacted Act 114 in 2018 to strengthen protections against revenge pornography. This law amended HRS 711-1110.9 to:
- Explicitly criminalize the disclosure of intimate images without consent, regardless of how the images were originally obtained
- Criminalize threatening to disclose intimate images without consent
- Cover disclosures made as acts of revenge or retribution, such as after a relationship ends
- Apply to images originally obtained with consent (such as images shared between partners) if later disclosed without consent
Key Elements of a Revenge Porn Charge
To establish a violation under the revenge porn provisions of HRS 711-1110.9, prosecutors must show:
- The defendant intentionally disclosed (or threatened to disclose) an image
- The image depicts the victim's intimate area, the victim in a state of undress, or the victim engaging in sexual conduct
- The defendant acted with intent to substantially harm the depicted person's health, safety, business, calling, career, education, financial condition, reputation, or personal relationships, or as an act of revenge or retribution
- The disclosure was made without the victim's consent
- The defendant knew or should have known that the victim had not consented to disclosure
Defenses
The statute provides limited defenses:
- The image was lawfully obtained and is of legitimate public concern
- The disclosure was made in the course of law enforcement, legal proceedings, or medical treatment
- The depicted person consented to the specific disclosure
Deepfake Laws in Hawaii
Act 59 (2021)
Hawaii was among the early states to address deepfake intimate imagery through legislation. Act 59 (2021) amended HRS 711-1110.9 to specifically criminalize:
- Creating a computer-generated image that realistically depicts a person nude or engaging in sexual conduct without that person's consent
- Disclosing such a computer-generated image without consent
- Threatening to disclose such an image without consent
What Counts as a Deepfake Under Hawaii Law
The law targets computer-generated images that "realistically depict" a person in intimate situations. This includes:
- AI-generated images that swap a person's face onto nude or sexual imagery
- AI tools that digitally remove clothing from photographs
- Any digitally manipulated image that creates a realistic depiction of intimate content involving a real person
Penalty for Deepfake Violations
Creating, disclosing, or threatening to disclose deepfake intimate images is a Class C felony carrying the same penalties as other first-degree privacy violations:
- Up to 5 years in prison
- Fines up to $10,000
Federal Deepfake Law: TAKE IT DOWN Act
The federal TAKE IT DOWN Act (signed May 19, 2025, effective May 19, 2026) supplements Hawaii's existing protections by imposing a 48-hour notice-and-takedown obligation on online platforms for non-consensual intimate images, including AI-generated deepfakes. Platforms that fail to remove flagged content face federal enforcement. This federal layer operates alongside Hawaii HRS 711-1110.9 and does not preempt it.
Note: Hawaii's election deepfake law, Act 191 SLH 2024, was permanently enjoined as facially unconstitutional in Babylon Bee LLC v. Lopez, No. 1:25-cv-00234 (D. Haw. Jan. 30, 2026) (Park, J.). That injunction applies only to the election-context deepfake provision; HRS 711-1110.9 (intimate image deepfakes) is unaffected.
Civil Remedies for Voyeurism Victims
Civil Lawsuits
In addition to criminal penalties, victims of voyeurism and hidden camera recording in Hawaii can pursue civil remedies:
- Invasion of privacy tort claims under Hawaii common law
- Intentional infliction of emotional distress for severe cases
- Civil damages under HRS 803-48 if the voyeurism also involved illegal interception of communications
- Injunctive relief to prevent further disclosure of images
Statutory Damages
Under HRS 803-48, victims of illegal interception can recover:
- Actual damages
- Profits derived from the violation
- Statutory damages of at least $10,000
- Attorney fees and litigation costs
Protective Orders
Victims can also seek temporary restraining orders (TROs) and protective orders under Hawaii family court or circuit court to:
- Prohibit the defendant from contacting the victim
- Order the deletion or destruction of images
- Prevent further distribution of intimate images
Law Enforcement Exception for Recording Police
Act 164 (2016)
It is important to note that Hawaii's privacy statutes include an exception for recording law enforcement officers. Act 164 (2016) amended both HRS 711-1111 and HRS 710-1010 to explicitly protect the right to record police officers performing their duties in public. This exception means that recording a police officer in a public place is not a violation of privacy, even though the recording captures the officer without consent. (See Hawaii laws on recording police for full details.)
Reporting Voyeurism in Hawaii
How to Report
If you are a victim of voyeurism or hidden camera recording in Hawaii:
- Contact local police to file a criminal report
- Preserve evidence of the recording device or images, but do not attempt to retrieve a hidden camera yourself if it may compromise evidence
- Document everything including dates, times, and circumstances of the discovery
- Contact a victim advocate through the Hawaii Crime Victim Compensation Commission or a local victim assistance program
- Consult an attorney about civil remedies and protective orders
Victim Resources
Hawaii offers several resources for voyeurism victims:
- Hawaii Crime Victim Compensation Commission: Provides financial assistance to crime victims for counseling and other expenses
- Hawaii State Coalition Against Domestic Violence: Offers support services and referrals
- Local law enforcement victim advocates: Available through county police departments
Penalty Comparison Table
| Offense | Statute | Classification | Max Prison | Max Fine |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hidden camera in private place | HRS 711-1111 | Misdemeanor | 1 year | $2,000 |
| Intimate image recording | HRS 711-1110.9 | Class C Felony | 5 years | $10,000 |
| Non-consensual disclosure | HRS 711-1110.9 | Class C Felony | 5 years | $10,000 |
| Threat to disclose | HRS 711-1110.9 | Class C Felony | 5 years | $10,000 |
| Deepfake creation/disclosure | HRS 711-1110.9 | Class C Felony | 5 years | $10,000 |
| Upskirting | HRS 711-1111 | Misdemeanor | 1 year | $2,000 |
More Hawaii Recording Laws
Audio Recording | Video Recording | Voyeurism and Hidden Cameras | Workplace Recording | Recording Police | Phone Call Recording | Security Cameras | Recording in Public | Landlord-Tenant Recording | Dashcam Laws | School Recording | Medical Recording
More Hawaii Recording Topics
More Hawaii Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Is it a felony to place a hidden camera in someone's home in Hawaii?
It depends on the circumstances. Installing a hidden camera in a private place without consent is a misdemeanor under HRS 711-1111 with up to 1 year in jail. However, if the camera captures intimate images, the charge elevates to violation of privacy in the first degree under HRS 711-1110.9, which is a Class C felony carrying up to 5 years in prison.
Is revenge porn illegal in Hawaii?
Yes. Hawaii Act 114 (2018) made it a Class C felony to disclose intimate images of another person without their consent. This applies even if the images were originally shared consensually, such as between partners during a relationship. Penalties include up to 5 years in prison and $10,000 in fines.
Are deepfake intimate images illegal in Hawaii?
Yes. Hawaii Act 59 (2021) specifically criminalized the creation, disclosure, or threat of disclosure of AI-generated deepfake images that realistically depict a person nude or engaging in sexual conduct without consent. This is a Class C felony with up to 5 years in prison.
Can I sue someone for recording me with a hidden camera in Hawaii?
Yes. In addition to criminal charges, victims can file civil lawsuits for invasion of privacy, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and statutory damages under HRS 803-48 (at least $10,000). You can also seek injunctive relief to require destruction of the recordings and protective orders to prevent further distribution.
Are hidden cameras legal in Airbnb rentals in Hawaii?
No. Hidden recording devices inside vacation rental units violate HRS 711-1111, which prohibits installing recording devices in private places without consent. Exterior security cameras that are disclosed in the rental listing may be permissible, but any camera inside the rental property that is not disclosed to guests is illegal.
Updates
Corrected the description of Hawaii's non-consensual intimate-image disclosure offense: the page had added a requirement that the image be originally obtained under an expectation of privacy, which is not in the statute and contradicted the page's own later, correct explanation that even consensually obtained images are covered once disclosed without consent.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected 'upskirting' (recording an intimate area underneath clothing in public): it is a misdemeanor under HRS 711-1111(1)(f), not the Class C felony under HRS 711-1110.9 the page previously stated, and restated the revenge-porn 'key elements' list to include the statute's actual intent-to-harm element instead of an unrelated recording-privacy element.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Hawaii Revised Statutes, Chapter 711: OFFENSES AGAINST PUBLIC ORDER
§ 711-1110.9Violation of privacy in the first degreeIn forcecited in 16 of our articles
(1) A person commits the offense of violation of privacy in the first degree if, except in the execution of a public duty or as authorized by law: (a) The person intentionally or knowingly installs or uses, or both, in any private place, without consent of the person or persons entitled to privacy therein, any device for observing, recording, amplifying, or broadcasting another person in a stage of undress or sexual activity in that place; (b) The person knowingly discloses or threatens to disclose an image or video of another identifiable person either in the nude, as defined in section 712‑1210, or engaging in sexual conduct, as defined in section 712-1210, without the consent of the depicted person, with intent to harm substantially the depicted person with respect to that person's health, safety, business, calling, career, education, financial condition, reputation, or personal relationships or as an act of revenge or retribution; or (c) The person intentionally creates or discloses or threatens to disclose an image or video of a composite fictitious person depicted in the nude as defined in section 712-1210, or engaged in sexual conduct as defined in section 712-1210, that…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-03 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at capitol.hawaii.gov
Cited in 7 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Hawaii courts have construed HRS 711-1110.9 in the Kaakimaka litigation. State v. Kaakimaka (2026) held subsection (1)(a) requires the device, or the person using it, to be inside the private place, and reversed a conviction where the phone stayed outside. A 2025 Kaakimaka opinion upheld the charge as drawn.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Kaakimaka (Hawaii Supreme Court 2026)✓A man stood outside a vacation home and aimed his phone at a bathroom window where a 15-year-old was showering; the court held the statute requires the device or the person using it to be inside the private place, found the evidence insufficient, and reversed the conviction.
- State v. Kaakimaka. ICA s.d.o., filed 01/31/2025 [ada], 155 Haw. 297. Opinion by Hiraoka, J. Concurring in Part and Dissenting in Part. Opinion by Guidry J. Concurring in Part and Dissenting in Part. Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed 05/16/2025. S.Ct. Order Accepting Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed 06/23/2025. S.Ct. Amended Order Accepting Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed 06/23/2025 [ada]. (Hawaii Supreme Court 2025)✓Charged with recording a girl showering, the defendant argued his indictment was defective because it did not define "private place"; the court held that term is an attendant circumstance whose statutory definition need not be alleged, and upheld the charge.
- State v. Olive (Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals 2025)“…and (b). These offenses are classified as Class C felonies. HRS § 711-1110.9(2) (2014 & 2018 Supp.). HR…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Hawaii Recording Laws (2026): Hybrid Consent State Rules, Hawaii Smart Glasses Recording Laws (2026), Hawaii Audio Recording Laws: One-Party Consent Rules and Penalties
§ 711-1111Violation of privacy in the second degreeIn forcecited in 19 of our articles
(1) A person commits the offense of violation of privacy in the second degree if, except in the execution of a public duty or as authorized by law, the person intentionally: (a) Trespasses on property for the purpose of subjecting anyone to eavesdropping or other surveillance in a private place; (b) Peers or peeps into a window or other opening of a dwelling or other structure adapted for sojourn or overnight accommodations for the purpose of spying on the occupant thereof or invading the privacy of another person with a lewd or unlawful purpose, under circumstances in which a reasonable person in the dwelling or other structure would not expect to be observed; (c) Trespasses on property for the sexual gratification of the actor; (d) Installs or uses, or both, in any private place, without consent of the person or persons entitled to privacy therein, any means or device for observing, recording, amplifying, or broadcasting sounds or events in that place other than another person in a stage of undress or sexual activity; provided that this paragraph shall not prohibit a person from making a video or audio recording or taking a photograph of a law enforcement officer while the…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at capitol.hawaii.gov
Cited in 10 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Hawaii decisions have construed HRS 711-1111 mainly alongside neighboring statutes. State v. Kaakimaka (2026) read subsections (1)(d) and (1)(e) as an inside and outside pair while construing the first-degree offense. State v. Lee (1984) treated 711-1111(1) as drawn from Model Penal Code 250.12 in reading the wiretap statute.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Lee (Hawaii Supreme Court 1984, 67 Haw. 307)✓An undercover officer wearing a recorder taped conversations in a doctor's private office; construing the wiretap consent provision drawn from HRS 711-1111(1)(b) and (c), the court held a body-worn device is not an "installation" in a private place, so the tapes were admissible.
- State v. Kaakimaka (Hawaii Supreme Court 2026)“…711-1110.9 and second degree violation of privacy under HRS § 711-1111 (2014 & Supp. 2025) convinces me that…”
- State v. Lester (Hawaii Supreme Court 1982, 64 Haw. 659)“…The Code provision covering wiretapping and eavesdropping, HRS § 711-1111, permits "consensual eavesdropping".…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Hawaii Dashcam Laws: Recording Rules, Audio Consent, and Legal Limits (2026), Hawaii Medical Recording Laws: Patient Rights, HIPAA, and Consent Rules (2026), Hawaii Laws on Recording in Public: Your Rights in Public Spaces
Hawaii Revised Statutes, Chapter 706: DISPOSITION OF CONVICTED DEFENDANTS
§ 706-660Sentence of imprisonment for class B and C felonies; ordinary terms; discretionary termsIn forcecited in 5 of our articles
(1) Except as provided in subsection (2), a person who has been convicted of a class B or class C felony may be sentenced to an indeterminate term of imprisonment except as provided for in section 706-660.1 relating to the use of firearms in certain felony offenses and section 706-606.5 relating to repeat offenders. When ordering such a sentence, the court shall impose the maximum length of imprisonment which shall be as follows: (a) For a class B felony--ten years; and (b) For a class C felony--five years. The minimum length of imprisonment shall be determined by the Hawaii paroling authority in accordance with section 706-669. (2) A person who has been convicted of a class B or class C felony for any offense under part IV of chapter 712 may be sentenced to an indeterminate term of imprisonment; provided that this subsection shall not apply to sentences imposed under sections 706-606.5, 706-660.1, 712-1240.5, 712-1240.8 as that section was in effect prior to July 1, 2016, 712-1242, 712-1245, 712-1249.5, 712‑1249.6, 712-1249.7, and 712-1257.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at capitol.hawaii.gov
Cited in 78 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Gaylord (Hawaii Supreme Court 1995, 78 Haw. 127)“…r alia, by an indeterminate ten-year term of imprisonment. HRS § 706-660(1) (Supp.1992). . We recognize th…”
- State v. Soto (Hawaii Supreme Court 1997, 84 Haw. 229)“…murder was a class B felony and was punishable pursuant to HRS § 706-660 (1985), 21 “which delineat…”
- State v. Rivera (Hawaii Supreme Court 2004, 106 Haw. 146)“…to the amendments made by Act 102 (1965), the commentary to HRS § 706-660 (1976) states, inter alia: In 1965…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Hawaii Phone Call Recording Laws: One-Party Consent Rules for Calls, Hawaii Security Camera Laws: Residential and Business Surveillance Rules
Hawaii Revised Statutes, Chapter 710: OFFENSES AGAINST PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
§ 710-1010Obstructing government operationsIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
(1) A person commits the offense of obstructing government operations if, by using or threatening to use violence, force, or physical interference or obstacle, the person intentionally obstructs, impairs, or hinders: (a) The performance of a governmental function by a public servant acting under color of the public servant's official authority; (b) The enforcement of the penal law or the preservation of the peace by a law enforcement officer acting under color of the law enforcement officer's official authority; or (c) The operation of a radio, telephone, television, or other telecommunication system owned or operated by the State or one of its political subdivisions.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at capitol.hawaii.gov
Cited in 2 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2017
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Line (Hawaii Supreme Court 2009, 121 Haw. 74)“…ration of Law or Other Governmental Function” is similar to HRS § 710-1010, entitled “Obstructing government opera…”
- State v. Teale. (Hawaii Supreme Court 2017, 139 Haw. 351)“…illegal activity after being issued a citation”); see also HRS § 710-1010 (1993 & Supp. 2001) (setting forth offe…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Hawaii Laws on Recording Police: Your Rights Under Act 164
Hawaii Revised Statutes, Chapter 803: ARRESTS, SEARCHES, SEARCH WARRANTS
§ 803-48Recovery of civil damages authorizedIn forcecited in 13 of our articles
Any person whose wire, oral, or electronic communication is accessed, intercepted, disclosed, or used in violation of this part shall[:] (1) Have a civil cause of action against any person who accesses, intercepts, discloses, or uses, or procures any other person to access, intercept, disclose, or use the communications[;] and (2) Be entitled to recover from any such person: (A) The greater of[:] (i) The sum of the actual damages suffered by the plaintiff and any profits made by the violator as a result of the violation[;] or (ii) Statutory damages of the greater of $100 a day for each day of violation or $10,000; (B) Punitive damages, where appropriate; and (C) A reasonable attorney's fee and other litigation costs reasonably incurred. The aggrieved person may also seek and be awarded such preliminary, and other equitable or declaratory relief as may be appropriate. A good faith reliance on a court order shall constitute a complete defense to any civil action brought under this part. [L 1978, c 218, pt of §2; am L 1986, c 303, §8; am L 1989, c 164, §10; am L 2006, c 200, pt of §4]
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at capitol.hawaii.gov
Also relied on in: Hawaii AI Meeting Recording Laws (2026), Hawaii Surveillance Camera Laws: Complete 2026 Guide, Hawaii Landlord-Tenant Recording Laws: Surveillance and Privacy Rights
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Hawaii Revised Statutes 711-1110.9 - Violation of Privacy in the First Degree(capitol.hawaii.gov).gov
- Hawaii Revised Statutes 711-1111 - Violation of Privacy in the Second Degree(capitol.hawaii.gov).gov
- Hawaii Revised Statutes 706-660 - Sentencing for Class B and C Felonies(capitol.hawaii.gov).gov
- Hawaii Revised Statutes 803-48 - Recovery of Civil Damages(capitol.hawaii.gov).gov
- Hawaii Act 164 (2016) - Right to Record Law Enforcement(capitol.hawaii.gov).gov
- Hawaii Revised Statutes 710-1010 - Obstructing Government Operations(capitol.hawaii.gov).gov