Hawaii
Hawaii Laws on Recording in Public: Your Rights in Public Spaces
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 15, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 15, 2026. · 6 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Hawaii law permits recording in public spaces where no reasonable expectation of privacy exists, backed by First Amendment protections that federal courts in the Ninth Circuit have consistently upheld. For audio, Hawaii's one-party consent rule under HRS 803-42 allows you to record any conversation you participate in, even in public.
Hawaii offers broad protections for recording in public spaces. The state has no statute that prohibits photography, videography, or audio recording in areas where the public has access and where there is no reasonable expectation of privacy. Combined with First Amendment protections, Hawaii's Sunshine Law, and the specific statutory protection for recording police under Act 164, residents and visitors have clear legal authority to record in most public settings.
However, Hawaii's unique geography and culture create some specific contexts that require attention, from public beach access rules to cultural site restrictions. This guide covers where you can record, the limits on public recording, audio recording rules, and how Hawaii law handles recording at government meetings, protests, and other public events.
The General Rule: Recording in Public Is Legal
First Amendment Protections
The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution protects the right to gather information in public spaces. Federal courts have consistently held that this includes the right to photograph, film, and record in areas where the public has access. In the Ninth Circuit, which covers Hawaii, Fordyce v. City of Seattle, 55 F.3d 436 (9th Cir. 1995) recognized a First Amendment right to film matters of public interest on public streets, and Askins v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, 899 F.3d 1035 (9th Cir. 2018) reaffirmed that right applies to federal officers. In Hawaii, this means you can:
- Film on public streets, sidewalks, and intersections
- Record in public parks and recreation areas
- Photograph public buildings and landmarks
- Film events, demonstrations, and gatherings in public spaces
- Record your own interactions with other people in public
No Expectation of Privacy in Public
The legal foundation for public recording is the concept of "reasonable expectation of privacy." In public spaces, people generally do not have a reasonable expectation that their actions, appearance, or audible conversations will be private. Hawaii's privacy statute chapter defines a "private place" as one that specifically excludes locations "to which the public or a substantial group of the public has access."
This means the privacy restrictions in HRS 711-1111 do not apply in public spaces. You can record video freely in public without the consent of the people captured in your footage.
Recording at Hawaii's Public Beaches

All Beaches Are Public
Hawaii's beaches are open to the public along the shoreline. Under HRS 115-5, the law establishes a public "beach transit corridor" seaward of the shoreline, and Hawaii courts have long recognized public beach access below that line under the customary-rights and public-trust doctrines, regardless of whether adjacent property is privately owned. The "shoreline" that marks this boundary is a statutory line (commonly, though not always precisely, described as the high-water mark), not a fixed private-property boundary.
This means you can:
- Photograph and film on any Hawaii beach up to the high-water mark
- Record surfers, swimmers, and beachgoers in public view
- Film sunsets, landscapes, and ocean activities
- Record your own activities and conversations at the beach
Limitations at Beaches
While you can record freely at public beaches, some restrictions apply:
- Voyeurism rules still apply. Covertly recording another person's intimate area underneath clothing (upskirting) in a public place, including a beach, is a misdemeanor under HRS 711-1111(1)(f)
- Commercial filming may require permits. Large-scale commercial productions on public beaches or in state parks may need permits from the Hawaii Film Office or county permitting authorities
- Respect for cultural practices. Some beach areas may be significant cultural sites where recording may be considered disrespectful, though this is a matter of courtesy rather than law
Recording in Hawaii's State and National Parks

State Parks
Hawaii's state parks are managed by the Department of Land and Natural Resources (DLNR). General recording rules include:
- Personal photography and videography is permitted in state parks
- Commercial filming requires a permit from the DLNR
- Specific areas within parks may have restrictions for safety or conservation reasons
- Drone use in state parks requires FAA compliance and may require additional permits
National Parks
Hawaii's national parks, including Hawaii Volcanoes National Park, Haleakala National Park, and others, are governed by federal National Park Service rules. Personal photography is generally permitted, but commercial photography requires a permit. Drone use is prohibited in most national park areas.
Audio Recording in Public Spaces

One-Party Consent in Public
For audio recording of conversations in public spaces, Hawaii's one-party consent law applies. Under HRS 803-42, you can record any conversation you participate in without informing the other parties. The private places exception under HRS 711-1111 does not apply in public spaces, so you can record conversations in:
- Public parks and beaches
- Public transportation
- Streets and sidewalks
- Public buildings open to the general public
- Any area that is not a "private place"
Bystander Conversations
You cannot record private conversations between other people that you are not part of, even in public spaces. One-party consent requires that you be a participant in the conversation. Covert recording of other people's private conversations that you are overhearing from a distance may raise issues under HRS 803-42.
Recording Public Government Meetings
The Sunshine Law: HRS Chapter 92
Hawaii's Sunshine Law (HRS Chapter 92) requires most government board and commission meetings to be open to the public. The right to attend these meetings includes the right to record them. Under the Sunshine Law:
- Public meetings must be open to the public and press
- Recording is permitted at public meetings unless the board has established reasonable restrictions
- Minutes of public meetings are public records that must be made available
Government Bodies Covered
The Sunshine Law applies to:
- State boards and commissions
- County councils and committees
- School board meetings
- Other government bodies exercising public functions
Restrictions on Meeting Recording
While recording at public meetings is generally permitted, some restrictions may apply:
- Equipment must not disrupt the meeting
- Microphones may need to be positioned to avoid interfering with proceedings
- Flash photography may be restricted in some settings
- Courts have more specific rules about recording
Recording Police in Public
Act 164 (2016)
Hawaii has one of the strongest statutory protections for recording law enforcement in the country. Act 164 (2016) amended HRS 711-1111 and HRS 710-1010 to explicitly protect the right to record police officers performing their duties in public places or where they have no reasonable expectation of privacy.
You can record police:
- Making arrests in public
- Conducting traffic stops
- Responding to incidents in public areas
- At protests and demonstrations
- In any public setting where they are performing their duties
For complete information on recording police in Hawaii, see Hawaii laws on recording police.
Protests and Public Demonstrations
Your Rights at Protests
The First Amendment strongly protects the right to document protests, rallies, and public demonstrations. In Hawaii, you can:
- Film protests and demonstrations from public spaces
- Record interactions between protesters and police
- Document arrests and use of force incidents at protests
- Livestream events on social media
Counter-Protesters and Third Parties
You cannot prevent others from recording you at a public protest. If you are in a public space participating in a demonstration, other people have the right to record you.
Drone Recording in Public
FAA Regulations
All drone operators must comply with FAA regulations. For recreational drones:
- Register drones weighing over 0.55 pounds with the FAA
- Follow the FAA's recreational rules for altitude and airspace
- Obtain FAA Part 107 certification for commercial drone operations
Hawaii-Specific Drone Rules
- State parks require additional permits for drone use
- National parks prohibit drones without a specific permit
- Honolulu International Airport and other airports have restricted airspace requiring authorization
- Flying drones over people in public spaces may raise privacy concerns even if legally permissible
Deepfakes, AI-Generated Content, and Public Recording
Hawaii's election deepfake law, Act 191 SLH 2024, was permanently enjoined as facially unconstitutional in Babylon Bee LLC v. Lopez, No. 1:25-cv-00234 (D. Haw. Jan. 30, 2026) (Park, J.). The federal TAKE IT DOWN Act (effective May 19, 2026) imposes platform notice-and-takedown obligations for non-consensual intimate images. Neither development restricts ordinary public recording rights, but both are part of Hawaii's evolving landscape on what can lawfully be done with recordings after they are made.
More Hawaii Recording Laws
Audio Recording | Video Recording | Voyeurism and Hidden Cameras | Workplace Recording | Recording Police | Phone Call Recording | Security Cameras | Recording in Public | Landlord-Tenant Recording | Dashcam Laws | School Recording | Medical Recording
More Hawaii Recording Topics
More Hawaii Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I film people in public in Hawaii?
Yes. Hawaii has no prohibition on recording in public spaces. The First Amendment protects your right to film in parks, beaches, streets, and other public areas. People in public do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their appearance or audible conversations.
Can I record audio of conversations in public in Hawaii?
Yes, for conversations you participate in. Hawaii's one-party consent law (HRS 803-42) allows you to record any conversation you are part of, including conversations in public spaces. You cannot secretly record private conversations between other people that you are not part of.
Can I record a government meeting in Hawaii?
Yes. Hawaii's Sunshine Law (HRS Chapter 92) guarantees the right to attend and record open public meetings of government boards and commissions. Equipment must not disrupt the meeting, and some boards may impose reasonable restrictions on recording equipment.
Can I film on Hawaii beaches?
Yes. Hawaii beaches are open to the public along the shoreline under HRS 115-5 and longstanding public beach-access case law. You can film up to this boundary. Commercial filming may require permits.
Can I use a drone to record in Hawaii?
For personal use, drones are generally legal on public land, subject to FAA regulations. Drones are prohibited in most national parks and require additional permits in some state parks. All operators must register drones over 0.55 pounds and follow FAA airspace rules.
Updates
Corrected the legal basis for Hawaii's public beach access: the page had cited a general state-constitution conservation clause that does not actually address beaches, and a dead HRS 115-5 link; both now point to the correct, live source. Also corrected the upskirting citation from the felony intimate-image statute to the actual misdemeanor upskirting provision, HRS 711-1111(1)(f).
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected the misattributed 'private place' definition: it does not appear in HRS 711-1111 (which defines only 'intimate areas' and 'public place'), so the quote is now attributed generically to Hawaii's privacy statute chapter instead of to the wrong section.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Hawaii Revised Statutes, Chapter 803: ARRESTS, SEARCHES, SEARCH WARRANTS
§ 803-42Interception, access, and disclosure of wire, oral, or electronic communications, use of pen register, trap and trace device, and mobile tracking device prohibitedIn forcecited in 20 of our articles
(a) Except as otherwise specifically provided in this part, any person who: (1) Intentionally intercepts, endeavors to intercept, or procures any other person to intercept or endeavor to intercept, any wire, oral, or electronic communication; (2) Intentionally uses, endeavors to use, or procures any other person to use or endeavor to use any electronic, mechanical, or other device to intercept any wire, oral, or electronic communication when: (A) Such a device is affixed to, or otherwise transmits a signal through, a wire, cable, or other similar connection used in wire communication; or (B) Such a device transmits communications by radio, or interferes with the transmission of such communication; (3) Intentionally discloses, or endeavors to disclose, to any other person the contents of any wire, oral, or electronic communication, knowing or having reason to know that the information was obtained through the interception of a wire, oral, or electronic communication in violation of this part; (4) Intentionally uses, or endeavors to use, the contents of any wire, oral, or electronic communication, knowing or having reason to know that the information was obtained through the…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at capitol.hawaii.gov
Cited in 14 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):State v. Lo (1983) held HRS 803-42(b)(3) barred police from secretly installing recording devices in a hotel room even though one participant consented, and suppressed the evidence. State v. Lee (1984) held a recorder worn by a consenting participant is not an installation in a private place, so no violation.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Lo (Hawaii Supreme Court 1983, 66 Haw. 653)✓Agents wired a hotel room and recorded a doctor lured there by a cooperating patient; the Hawaii Supreme Court held the statute bars installing a recording device in any private place without the consent of those entitled to privacy, and affirmed suppression.
- State v. Okubo (Hawaii Supreme Court 1984, 67 Haw. 197)✓Police recorded roughly forty bribery conversations using body recorders and phone taps with the participating officers' consent; the Hawaii Supreme Court found the consensual monitoring valid under the statute and the state constitution.
- State v. Lee (Hawaii Supreme Court 1984, 67 Haw. 307)✓An officer posing as a patient wore a recorder into a doctor's private office; the Hawaii Supreme Court held a device worn on a participant's body is not an installation in a private place, so the statute was not violated, distinguishing Lo.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Hawaii Recording Laws (2026): Hybrid Consent State Rules, Hawaii Audio Recording Laws: One-Party Consent Rules and Penalties, Hawaii Smart Glasses Recording Laws (2026)
Hawaii Revised Statutes, Chapter 115: PUBLIC ACCESS TO COASTAL AND INLAND RECREATIONAL
§ 115-5Beach transit corridor definedIn force
(a) The right of transit shall exist seaward of the shoreline and this area shall be defined as a beach transit corridor. For purposes of this section, "shoreline" shall have the same meaning as in section 205A-1. However, in areas of cliffs or areas where the nature of the topography is such that there is no reasonably safe transit for the public along the shoreline below the private property lines, the counties by condemnation may establish along the makai boundaries of the property lines public transit corridors which shall be not less than six feet wide. (b) Along beach transit corridors where the abutting landowner's human-induced, enhanced, or unmaintained vegetation interferes or encroaches with beach transit corridors, the department of land and natural resources may require the abutting landowner to remove the landowner's interfering or encroaching vegetation. [L 1974, c 244, §5; am L 2010, c 160, §3]
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at capitol.hawaii.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2014
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Diamond v. Dobbin. (Hawaii Supreme Court 2014, 132 Haw. 9)“…oundary delininating a “beach transit corridor” pursuant to HRS § 115-5 (1993). A “beach transit corridor” desi…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Hawaii Revised Statutes, Chapter 711: OFFENSES AGAINST PUBLIC ORDER
§ 711-1110.9Violation of privacy in the first degreeIn forcecited in 16 of our articles
(1) A person commits the offense of violation of privacy in the first degree if, except in the execution of a public duty or as authorized by law: (a) The person intentionally or knowingly installs or uses, or both, in any private place, without consent of the person or persons entitled to privacy therein, any device for observing, recording, amplifying, or broadcasting another person in a stage of undress or sexual activity in that place; (b) The person knowingly discloses or threatens to disclose an image or video of another identifiable person either in the nude, as defined in section 712‑1210, or engaging in sexual conduct, as defined in section 712-1210, without the consent of the depicted person, with intent to harm substantially the depicted person with respect to that person's health, safety, business, calling, career, education, financial condition, reputation, or personal relationships or as an act of revenge or retribution; or (c) The person intentionally creates or discloses or threatens to disclose an image or video of a composite fictitious person depicted in the nude as defined in section 712-1210, or engaged in sexual conduct as defined in section 712-1210, that…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-03 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at capitol.hawaii.gov
Cited in 7 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Hawaii courts have construed HRS 711-1110.9 in the Kaakimaka litigation. State v. Kaakimaka (2026) held subsection (1)(a) requires the device, or the person using it, to be inside the private place, and reversed a conviction where the phone stayed outside. A 2025 Kaakimaka opinion upheld the charge as drawn.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Kaakimaka (Hawaii Supreme Court 2026)✓A man stood outside a vacation home and aimed his phone at a bathroom window where a 15-year-old was showering; the court held the statute requires the device or the person using it to be inside the private place, found the evidence insufficient, and reversed the conviction.
- State v. Kaakimaka. ICA s.d.o., filed 01/31/2025 [ada], 155 Haw. 297. Opinion by Hiraoka, J. Concurring in Part and Dissenting in Part. Opinion by Guidry J. Concurring in Part and Dissenting in Part. Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed 05/16/2025. S.Ct. Order Accepting Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed 06/23/2025. S.Ct. Amended Order Accepting Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed 06/23/2025 [ada]. (Hawaii Supreme Court 2025)✓Charged with recording a girl showering, the defendant argued his indictment was defective because it did not define "private place"; the court held that term is an attendant circumstance whose statutory definition need not be alleged, and upheld the charge.
- State v. Olive (Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals 2025)“…and (b). These offenses are classified as Class C felonies. HRS § 711-1110.9(2) (2014 & 2018 Supp.). HR…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Hawaii Landlord-Tenant Recording Laws: Surveillance and Privacy Rights, Hawaii School Recording Laws: Student Privacy, FERPA, and Classroom Rules (2026), Hawaii Security Camera Laws: Residential and Business Surveillance Rules
§ 711-1111Violation of privacy in the second degreeIn forcecited in 19 of our articles
(1) A person commits the offense of violation of privacy in the second degree if, except in the execution of a public duty or as authorized by law, the person intentionally: (a) Trespasses on property for the purpose of subjecting anyone to eavesdropping or other surveillance in a private place; (b) Peers or peeps into a window or other opening of a dwelling or other structure adapted for sojourn or overnight accommodations for the purpose of spying on the occupant thereof or invading the privacy of another person with a lewd or unlawful purpose, under circumstances in which a reasonable person in the dwelling or other structure would not expect to be observed; (c) Trespasses on property for the sexual gratification of the actor; (d) Installs or uses, or both, in any private place, without consent of the person or persons entitled to privacy therein, any means or device for observing, recording, amplifying, or broadcasting sounds or events in that place other than another person in a stage of undress or sexual activity; provided that this paragraph shall not prohibit a person from making a video or audio recording or taking a photograph of a law enforcement officer while the…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at capitol.hawaii.gov
Cited in 10 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Hawaii decisions have construed HRS 711-1111 mainly alongside neighboring statutes. State v. Kaakimaka (2026) read subsections (1)(d) and (1)(e) as an inside and outside pair while construing the first-degree offense. State v. Lee (1984) treated 711-1111(1) as drawn from Model Penal Code 250.12 in reading the wiretap statute.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Lee (Hawaii Supreme Court 1984, 67 Haw. 307)✓An undercover officer wearing a recorder taped conversations in a doctor's private office; construing the wiretap consent provision drawn from HRS 711-1111(1)(b) and (c), the court held a body-worn device is not an "installation" in a private place, so the tapes were admissible.
- State v. Kaakimaka (Hawaii Supreme Court 2026)“…711-1110.9 and second degree violation of privacy under HRS § 711-1111 (2014 & Supp. 2025) convinces me that…”
- State v. Lester (Hawaii Supreme Court 1982, 64 Haw. 659)“…The Code provision covering wiretapping and eavesdropping, HRS § 711-1111, permits "consensual eavesdropping".…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Hawaii Dashcam Laws: Recording Rules, Audio Consent, and Legal Limits (2026), Hawaii Medical Recording Laws: Patient Rights, HIPAA, and Consent Rules (2026), Hawaii Phone Call Recording Laws: One-Party Consent Rules for Calls
Explore the law
This article also draws on these acts and chapters (opening at their first section): Hawaii Revised Statutes, Chapter 92: PUBLIC AGENCY MEETINGS AND RECORDS § 92-1 (Declaration of policy and intent)
Related law for further reading — not part of this article’s citations.
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Hawaii Revised Statutes 711-1111 - Violation of Privacy in the Second Degree(capitol.hawaii.gov).gov
- Hawaii Revised Statutes 803-42 - Interception of Communications(capitol.hawaii.gov).gov
- Hawaii Revised Statutes Chapter 92 - Sunshine Law(capitol.hawaii.gov).gov
- Hawaii Act 164 (2016) - Right to Record Law Enforcement(capitol.hawaii.gov).gov
- Hawaii Office of Information Practices(oip.hawaii.gov).gov
- Hawaii Revised Statutes 115-5 - Beach Transit Corridor Defined(capitol.hawaii.gov).gov