Georgia
Georgia Landlord-Tenant Recording Laws: Rights and Restrictions (2026)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 15, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 9, 2026. · 3 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Georgia follows one-party consent under O.C.G.A. § 16-11-66, so either party may record a conversation they join without notifying the other. Landlords may install security cameras in common areas but cannot place cameras inside a tenant's private rental unit under O.C.G.A. § 16-11-62.
Georgia's recording laws play a significant role in landlord-tenant relationships. Tenants frequently need to document conversations about repairs, lease disputes, and potential harassment, while landlords need to maintain security surveillance without invading tenant privacy. Understanding where the legal lines fall protects both parties.
This guide covers tenant rights to record conversations with landlords, landlord surveillance of rental properties, security camera rules for common areas and units, Airbnb and short-term rental camera rules, and the penalties landlords face for illegal surveillance.
Tenant Rights to Record Landlord Conversations
Audio Recording Under One-Party Consent
Georgia's one-party consent law (O.C.G.A. § 16-11-66) gives tenants the right to audio record any conversation they participate in with their landlord, property manager, or maintenance staff. You do not need to tell the landlord you are recording.
This right applies to:
- Phone calls with your landlord about repairs or lease issues
- In-person conversations during property inspections
- Meetings with property management about noise complaints or lease violations
- Discussions about security deposit disputes
- Verbal agreements about maintenance, rent changes, or lease modifications
- Conversations with maintenance workers entering your unit
Why Tenants Record Landlords
Recording interactions with landlords serves several practical purposes:
- Documenting verbal agreements. Landlords sometimes make promises about repairs, upgrades, or rent adjustments that they later deny. A recording provides proof.
- Preserving evidence of harassment. If a landlord harasses, threatens, or discriminates against you, audio recordings provide objective evidence for legal proceedings.
- Recording unauthorized entries. Georgia's Landlord-Tenant Act does not include a specific statutory notice requirement for landlord entry (unlike many other states), but recordings can document when and how a landlord enters your unit.
- Protecting against retaliation. If a landlord retaliates against you for exercising your rights (requesting repairs, filing complaints), recordings document the retaliatory conduct.
Using Recordings in Landlord-Tenant Disputes
Lawfully recorded conversations can be used as evidence in:
- Magistrate court (small claims) for security deposit disputes
- Superior court for lease violation or wrongful eviction cases
- Housing discrimination complaints filed with HUD or the Georgia Commission on Equal Opportunity
- Code enforcement complaints about habitability issues
- Mediation and arbitration proceedings
Landlord Surveillance of Rental Properties

Where Landlords Can Install Cameras
Landlords can install security cameras in common areas of rental properties for legitimate security purposes. Lawful camera locations include:
- Building entrances and exits. Lobbies, front doors, and security gates
- Hallways and corridors. Shared walkways in apartment buildings
- Parking lots and garages. Vehicle security and access monitoring
- Laundry rooms and mailbox areas. Theft prevention in shared facilities
- Exterior building perimeters. Property boundary surveillance
- Pool and recreation areas. Safety monitoring in shared amenities
Where Landlords Cannot Install Cameras
Landlords are strictly prohibited from installing cameras in areas where tenants have a reasonable expectation of privacy:
- Inside the rental unit. A landlord cannot install visible or hidden cameras inside a tenant's apartment, house, or room.
- Bathrooms. All bathrooms, including shared bathrooms in common areas, are off-limits.
- Inside windows facing the unit. Cameras positioned to look into a tenant's living space from outside violate privacy laws.
- Near bedroom windows. Cameras that capture activities inside a tenant's bedroom through windows violate both O.C.G.A. § 16-11-62(2) and the Peeping Tom statute.
Audio Recording by Landlords
Landlords who install security cameras with audio capabilities must comply with Georgia's one-party consent rule. A surveillance camera that records conversations between tenants in a common area hallway without any participant's consent may violate O.C.G.A. § 16-11-62(1), which prohibits clandestine recording of private conversations.
Best practice for landlords: use video-only cameras in common areas, or prominently post signage stating that audio and video recording is in progress. Signage provides notice that can reduce tenants' expectation of privacy in monitored areas.
Tenant Security Camera Rights

Installing Your Own Cameras
Tenants generally have the right to install security cameras inside their rental unit for personal safety. This includes:
- Interior cameras monitoring your own living spaces
- Doorbell cameras like Ring or Nest Hello at your front door
- Nanny cameras monitoring childcare providers in your home
- Window cameras monitoring the view from your unit
Exterior Camera Considerations
Installing cameras on the exterior of a rental property (mounting a Ring doorbell, placing a camera on a porch or balcony) may require landlord approval because it involves modifying the building's exterior. Check your lease for provisions about:
- Alterations to the unit or building exterior
- Requirements for landlord approval before mounting devices
- Rules about drilling, adhesive mounts, or wiring
- Whether you must remove cameras when you move out
Cameras and Roommate Privacy
If you share a rental unit with roommates, you can install cameras in your private bedroom and in common areas of the unit. However, you cannot place cameras in a roommate's private bedroom or bathroom. Roommates in shared spaces have complex privacy expectations, so communicating about camera placement is a best practice.
Airbnb and Short-Term Rental Recording Rules

Georgia Law for Short-Term Rental Hosts
Short-term rental hosts in Georgia who list properties on Airbnb, VRBO, or similar platforms must follow the same privacy rules as traditional landlords. Under O.C.G.A. § 16-11-62(2), recording the activities of guests in private places without their consent is a felony.
Hosts can place cameras:
- In exterior areas (front door, driveway, parking area)
- In common areas that are clearly not private
Hosts cannot place cameras:
- Inside the rental unit (bedrooms, living rooms, bathrooms, kitchens)
- In any indoor area where guests have a reasonable expectation of privacy
- Hidden cameras anywhere on the property that record guests without consent
Disclosure Requirements
While Georgia law does not have a specific short-term rental disclosure statute, Airbnb's platform policy requires hosts to disclose all security cameras and recording devices on the property, even if they are in permitted exterior locations. Failure to disclose can result in removal from the platform and potential legal liability.
Guest Rights
Short-term rental guests have the same privacy protections as traditional tenants in private spaces. If you discover a hidden camera inside an Airbnb unit in Georgia, you can:
- Report the host to the rental platform
- File a police report for potential violation of O.C.G.A. § 16-11-62
- File a civil lawsuit for invasion of privacy
- Contact the local prosecutor's office
Illegal Landlord Entry and Recording
Documenting Unauthorized Entry
Georgia's landlord-tenant law does not include a specific statutory notice requirement for landlord entry comparable to those in states like California or New York. However, landlords still cannot enter a tenant's unit to conduct surveillance or install recording devices without consent.
If you suspect your landlord has entered your unit without authorization or installed hidden cameras:
- Inspect your unit thoroughly. Look for unusual objects, small holes in walls, new smoke detectors or devices you did not install, or objects positioned to face private areas.
- Use a camera detector. RF (radio frequency) detectors and lens finders can locate hidden cameras.
- Document everything. Photograph or video record any suspicious devices you find.
- Contact law enforcement. Unauthorized camera installation in a tenant's private living space is a felony.
- Preserve evidence. Do not remove or destroy discovered devices, as they constitute evidence.
Penalties for Landlord Surveillance Violations
Criminal Penalties
A landlord who installs hidden cameras inside a tenant's unit or conducts unauthorized surveillance of private spaces faces felony charges under O.C.G.A. § 16-11-69:
| Offense | Statute | Penalty |
|---|---|---|
| Recording in private place without consent | O.C.G.A. § 16-11-62(2) | 1-5 years prison, up to $10,000 fine |
| Peeping Tom | O.C.G.A. § 16-11-61 | 1-5 years prison |
| Distributing private recordings | O.C.G.A. § 16-11-62(6) | 1-5 years prison, up to $10,000 fine |
Civil Remedies for Tenants
Tenants who are victims of illegal landlord surveillance can pursue:
- Invasion of privacy lawsuits seeking compensatory damages
- Intentional infliction of emotional distress claims
- Lease termination without penalty based on the landlord's breach
- Injunctive relief ordering removal of cameras and prohibiting future surveillance
- Punitive damages in cases involving willful or malicious conduct
- Federal Wiretap Act damages under 18 U.S.C. § 2520 for unauthorized audio recording
- Housing discrimination claims if surveillance targets tenants based on protected characteristics
Best Practices for Landlords
- Install cameras only in common areas. Keep surveillance out of all private tenant spaces.
- Use video-only cameras. Disable audio to avoid wiretapping complications.
- Post signage. Notify tenants and visitors that common areas are under video surveillance.
- Include surveillance policies in the lease. Describe camera locations and monitoring purposes.
- Never enter a unit to install cameras without tenant consent. This constitutes both unauthorized entry and potential criminal surveillance.
- Comply with platform disclosure rules. Short-term rental hosts must disclose all recording devices.
Best Practices for Tenants
- Record important conversations. Use your one-party consent rights to document verbal agreements and disputes.
- Document property conditions. Video record the condition of your unit at move-in and move-out.
- Check for hidden cameras. Inspect your unit periodically, especially after landlord visits.
- Know your lease terms. Review what your lease says about cameras, modifications, and landlord entry.
- Report violations. If your landlord conducts illegal surveillance, file a police report and consult an attorney.
More Georgia Recording Laws
Audio Recording | Video Recording | Voyeurism & Hidden Cameras | Workplace Recording | Recording Police | Phone Call Recording | Security Cameras | Recording in Public | Landlord-Tenant | Dashcam Laws | Schools | Medical Recording
Back to Georgia Recording Laws
More Georgia Recording Topics
More Georgia Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I record conversations with my landlord in Georgia?
Yes. Georgia's one-party consent law under O.C.G.A. § 16-11-66 allows you to audio record any conversation you participate in with your landlord, property manager, or maintenance staff without telling them. These recordings can serve as evidence in security deposit disputes, habitability complaints, and harassment claims.
Can my landlord install cameras inside my apartment in Georgia?
No. Installing cameras inside a tenant's private rental unit without their consent violates O.C.G.A. § 16-11-62(2) and is a felony in Georgia. Landlords can install cameras in common areas like building entrances, hallways, and parking lots for security purposes.
Can I install a Ring doorbell at my rental in Georgia?
You can install interior cameras without restriction. For exterior devices like Ring doorbells that require mounting on the building, check your lease for provisions about exterior modifications. Many landlords permit doorbell cameras with prior approval. You may need to remove the device when you move out.
Are Airbnb hidden cameras legal in Georgia?
No. Hidden cameras inside an Airbnb or short-term rental unit are illegal in Georgia. O.C.G.A. § 16-11-62(2) prohibits recording activities in private places without the consent of all persons observed. Hosts can have disclosed exterior cameras but cannot record guests in private spaces. Violations are felonies.
What should I do if I find a hidden camera in my rental in Georgia?
Document the camera's location with photographs, do not remove or destroy it (it is evidence), contact local law enforcement to file a police report, and consult an attorney about civil remedies. The landlord faces felony charges under O.C.G.A. § 16-11-62 and potential civil liability for invasion of privacy.
Updates
Repaired every O.C.G.A. citation link on this page (the prior codifier host, ga.elaws.us, is down sitewide) and corrected a generic "Landlord-Tenant Act" link that pointed at a bare homepage to point at the actual Georgia Landlord and Tenant Code.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected two wrong statute citations: distributing private recordings is O.C.G.A. § 16-11-62(6), not (4) (which covers intercepting telephone/letter messages); clandestine recording of private conversations is § 16-11-62(1), not the trespass-based (3).
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Official Code of Georgia Annotated
§ 16-11-66Interception of wire, oral, or electronic communication by party thereto; consent requirements for recording and divulging conversations to which child under 18 years is a party; parental exception.In forcecited in 18 of our articles
(a) Nothing in Code Section 16-11-62 shall prohibit a person from intercepting a wire, oral, or electronic communication where such person is a party to the communication or one of the parties to the communication has given prior consent to such interception. (b) After obtaining the consent…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at advance.lexis.com
Cited in 43 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2020
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):State v. Cohen (2017) held OCGA 16-11-66(a) reaches only intercepted wire, oral, or electronic communications, so one party's consent does not authorize secretly video recording others in a private place. Bishop v. State (1999) barred vicarious parental consent under the text in force before the 2000 amendment.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Dobbins v. State (Supreme Court of Georgia 1992, 262 Ga. 161)✓An investigator recorded a child's call to the defendant using only her father's consent and no warrant; the Supreme Court held the state had neither an investigation warrant nor valid consent of a party to the call, so the recording and its fruits were inadmissible.
- State v. Cohen (Supreme Court of Georgia 2017, 302 Ga. 616)✓A housekeeper secretly videoed her employer naked at home; the Supreme Court held the one-party-consent rule of OCGA 16-11-66(a) covers only intercepted wire, oral or electronic communications and does not permit video recording without the consent of all observed.
- State v. Madison (Court of Appeals of Georgia 2011, 311 Ga. App. 31)✓A molestation complainant secretly videoed the defendant in his law office; the court read the 16-11-66(a) participant exception to reach section 16-11-62, but found no wire, oral or electronic communication captured, so it affirmed suppression. Cohen overruled that reading.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Georgia Recording Laws (2026): One-Party Audio, All-Party Video, Georgia AI Meeting Recording Laws (2026), Georgia Ring Doorbell Laws: What You Need to Know in 2026
§ 16-11-61Peeping Toms.In forcecited in 5 of our articles
(a) It shall be unlawful for any person to be a "peeping Tom" on or about the premises of another or to go about or upon the premises of another for the purpose of becoming a "peeping Tom." (b) As used in this Code section, the term "peeping Tom" means a person who peeps through windows or doors,…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2021-08-17 · Read the full text in our law library
Cited in 18 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Smith v. State (Court of Appeals of Georgia 1999, 238 Ga. App. 605)“…A jury found Donald Smith guilty of being a “peeping Tom.” OCGA § 16-11-61. His motion for new trial was denied by…”
- In the Interest of J. G. (Court of Appeals of Georgia 1988, 188 Ga. App. 856)“…appellant had committed the delinquent act of peeping Tom, OCGA § 16-11-61, the sole enumeration of error concerns…”
- Rosenthal v. Hudson (Court of Appeals of Georgia 1987, 183 Ga. App. 712)“…ut a warrant for appellee’s arrest for being a peeping Tom (OCGA § 16-11-61). When that warrant was dismissed by a…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Georgia Security Camera Laws: Residential and Business Rules (2026), Georgia Video Recording Laws: All-Party Consent in Private Places (2026), Georgia Voyeurism and Hidden Camera Laws: Criminal Penalties (2026)
§ 16-11-62Eavesdropping, surveillance, or intercepting communication which invades privacy of another; divulging private message.In forcecited in 25 of our articles
It shall be unlawful for: (1) Any person in a clandestine manner intentionally to overhear, transmit, or record or attempt to overhear, transmit, or record the private conversation of another which shall originate in any private place; (2) Any person, through the use of any device, without the
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legis.ga.gov
Cited in 94 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Kelley v. State (1998) held OCGA 16-11-62(2) reached a guardian who photographed a nude 16-year-old in the family bathroom, with no exception for family members. Burgeson v. State (1996) held a conversation recorded in a patrol car was not covered, because no reasonable expectation of privacy existed there.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Burgeson v. State (Supreme Court of Georgia 1996, 267 Ga. 102)✓Police secretly recorded two arrestees talking in the back of a patrol car. The court held a police car is much like a jail cell, with no reasonable expectation of privacy, so intercepting that conversation did not offend OCGA 16-11-62 and the tape was admissible.
- Kelley v. State (Court of Appeals of Georgia 1998, 233 Ga. App. 244)✓A guardian photographed her 16-year-old niece nude and passed out in the family bathtub. The court held OCGA 16-11-62(2) reaches any person with no family exception, that the film need not be developed, and that a jury could find the bathroom a private place.
- Dobbins v. State (Supreme Court of Georgia 1992, 262 Ga. 161)“…th the consent of one of the parties to the conversation. OCGA § 16-11-62 (1) provides that: It shall be unlawf…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Georgia Data Privacy Laws: Breach Notification & Consumer Rights (2026), Georgia Surveillance Camera Laws (2026 Guide), Georgia Windshield Mounting Laws (2026 Guide)
§ 16-11-69Penalty for violations of part.In forcecited in 13 of our articles
Except as otherwise provided in subsection (d) of Code Section 16-11-66.1, any person violating any of the provisions of this part shall be guilty of a felony and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one nor more than five years or a fine not to exceed…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2021-08-17 · Read the full text in our law library
Cited in 8 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2019
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Rutter v. Rutter (Court of Appeals of Georgia 2012, 316 Ga. App. 894)“…a penal statute, a violation being punishable as a felony. OCGA § 16-11-69. As such, the rule of lenity is a prope…”
- Prophitt v. the State (Court of Appeals of Georgia 2016, 336 Ga. App. 262)“…The crime of invasion of privacy constitutes a felony, see OCGA § 16-11-69, and this Court has previously held tha…”
- Price v. State (Court of Appeals of Georgia 2013, 320 Ga. App. 85)“…rt order. 2 Because Price was convicted of a felony, see OCGA § 16-11-69, and sentenced to five years of confine…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Georgia Audio Recording Laws: One-Party Consent Rules and Penalties (2026), Georgia Medical Recording Laws: Patient Rights and HIPAA Rules (2026), Georgia Phone Call Recording Laws: One-Party Consent Rules (2026)
United States Code Title 18
§ 2520Recovery of civil damages authorizedIn forcecited in 115 of our articles
Except as provided in section 2511(2)(a)(ii), any person whose wire, oral, or electronic communication is intercepted, disclosed, or intentionally used in violation of this chapter may in a civil action recover from the person or entity, other than the United States, which engaged in that violation such relief as may be appropriate. In an action under this section, appropriate relief includes— such preliminary and other equitable or declaratory relief as may be appropriate; damages under subsection (c) and punitive damages in appropriate cases; and a reasonable attorney’s fee and other litigation costs reasonably incurred.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 860 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Walker v. Darby (1990) held a 2520 plaintiff need not prove the contents of intercepted conversations, only interception and a justified expectation against it. Bartnicki v. Vopper (2001) barred 2520 damages against defendants who took no part in the interception, obtained the tape lawfully, and disclosed a matter of public concern.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Jessie Walker v. Thomas E. Darby, Hugh L. Robinson, Jr., and Kenneth Day (Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit 1990, 911 F.2d 1573)✓A postal letter carrier said three supervisors wired an intercom near his workstation to listen in. Reversing summary judgment, the Eleventh Circuit held a section 2520 plaintiff can show interception without proving the contents of specific conversations.
- Gelbard v. United States (Supreme Court of the United States 1972, 408 U.S. 41)“…disclosure, or use is entitled to recover civil damages, 18 U. S. C. § 2520 . Title III also bars the use as eviden…”
- DirecTV, Inc. v. Hoa Huynh (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2007, 503 F.3d 847)“…7 U.S.C. § 605 (e)(4), or alternatively, for violations of 18 U.S.C. § 2520 (a), or alternatively, for violations o…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: US Recording Laws by State (2026): All 50 States Explained, One-Party Consent States: Complete 2026 Guide, Alabama Audio Recording Laws: Consent Rules and Penalties
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- O.C.G.A. § 16-11-62 - Eavesdropping, Surveillance, Intercepting Communication(law.justia.com)
- O.C.G.A. § 16-11-66 - One-Party Consent Exception(law.justia.com)
- O.C.G.A. § 16-11-61 - Peeping Tom Statute(law.justia.com)
- Georgia Commission on Equal Opportunity(gceo.georgia.gov).gov
- Georgia Open Meetings Act(law.georgia.gov).gov
- Georgia AG FAQ(law.georgia.gov).gov
- 18 U.S.C. § 2520 - Recovery of Civil Damages(law.cornell.edu)