Georgia
Georgia Voyeurism and Hidden Camera Laws: Criminal Penalties (2026)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 15, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 15, 2026. · 4 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Georgia criminalizes voyeurism and hidden camera surveillance as felonies. O.C.G.A. 16-11-62(2) bars using any device to record activities in a private place without the consent of all persons observed. The Peeping Tom statute and the voyeurism-by-device statute each add separate felony charges, and prosecutors can stack all three.
Georgia takes voyeurism and hidden camera offenses seriously, classifying them as felonies that carry significant prison time and lasting consequences including potential sex offender registration. Three separate criminal statutes address different forms of invasive surveillance, and a single act of voyeuristic recording can trigger charges under all of them.
This guide covers Georgia's Peeping Tom law, the voyeurism-by-device statute, hidden camera offenses, the relationship between these laws and the general recording statutes, sex offender registration requirements, and how victims can seek justice.
Georgia's Three Voyeurism Statutes
Georgia addresses voyeurism and hidden camera offenses through three overlapping criminal statutes:
| Statute | Offense | Classification | Penalty |
|---|---|---|---|
| O.C.G.A. § 16-11-61 | Peeping Tom | Felony | 1-5 years prison |
| O.C.G.A. § 16-11-62(2) | Recording in private place without consent | Felony | 1-5 years prison, up to $10,000 fine |
| O.C.G.A. § 16-11-91 | Voyeurism by device (upskirting) | Felony | 1-5 years prison, up to $10,000 fine |
Each statute targets a different form of invasive surveillance, and prosecutors can charge a defendant under multiple statutes for a single incident.
The Peeping Tom Statute: O.C.G.A. § 16-11-61

What the Law Prohibits
Georgia's Peeping Tom statute makes it unlawful for any person to be a "peeping Tom" on or about the premises of another or to go on or about the premises of another for the purpose of becoming a peeping Tom.
The statute defines a peeping Tom as a person who peeps through windows, doors, or other like places on or about the premises of another for the purpose of spying upon or invading the privacy of the persons spied upon, and the doing of any other acts of a similar nature that invade the privacy of such persons.
Elements of the Offense
To secure a conviction under this statute, the prosecution must prove:
- The defendant went on or about the premises of another person. This includes approaching or being near someone's home, apartment, hotel room, or other private premises.
- The defendant peered through windows, doors, or similar openings. The statute covers any opening that provides a view into a private space.
- The purpose was to spy upon or invade the privacy of the occupant. Intent matters. Accidentally seeing into someone's window is not a crime. Deliberately positioning yourself to observe someone in private is.
Important Legal Points
- Success is not required. The Georgia courts have established that the prosecution does not need to prove the spying was successful. The act of going to someone's property with the intent to spy is enough for a conviction. Whether or not the target person was actually visible does not determine guilt.
- Technology extends the statute. While the statute was originally written for physical peeping, Georgia courts have applied it to modern surveillance technology. Using a camera, binoculars, drone, or other device to peer into someone's private spaces from their premises falls within the statute's scope.
- The statute covers approach and attempt. Going "on or about the premises" for the purpose of becoming a peeping Tom is itself the offense. You do not have to actually look through a window if your purpose in approaching was to do so.
Penalty
Peeping Tom is a felony in Georgia, punishable by imprisonment for 1 to 5 years under O.C.G.A. § 16-11-69.
Voyeurism by Device: O.C.G.A. § 16-11-91

What the Law Prohibits
O.C.G.A. § 16-11-91 targets a specific form of technology-enabled voyeurism. The statute prohibits any person from using any device to surreptitiously photograph or record another person underneath or through the clothing worn by the other person to view the body of or the undergarments worn by the other person without that person's consent.
This statute covers what is commonly called "upskirting" or "downblousing," where someone uses a hidden camera or angled device to capture images underneath or through another person's clothing.
Key Features of the Statute
- Applies in public AND private places. Unlike the general recording statute (O.C.G.A. § 16-11-62(2)) which focuses on private places, the voyeurism-by-device statute applies everywhere. You can be convicted for upskirting someone on a public sidewalk, in a store, at a park, or anywhere else.
- Covers all devices. Smartphones, miniature cameras, modified shoes with cameras, hidden cameras in bags, and any other recording device capable of capturing images.
- Covers both photography and video. Still images and video recordings are both prohibited.
- Consent is a defense. The statute includes "without that person's consent" as an element. If the photographed person consents, there is no violation.
Penalty
Voyeurism by device is a felony carrying:
- 1 to 5 years in prison
- Fine of up to $10,000
- Or both
Hidden Cameras in Private Places: O.C.G.A. § 16-11-62(2)

The General Recording Prohibition
O.C.G.A. § 16-11-62(2) makes it unlawful for any person, through the use of any device, without the consent of all persons observed, to observe, photograph, or record the activities of another which occur in any private place and out of public view.
This is the broadest of Georgia's three voyeurism-related statutes because it covers all forms of hidden camera surveillance in private places, not just sexual or intimate recording.
Common Hidden Camera Scenarios
This statute applies to a wide range of hidden camera situations:
- Hidden cameras in bathrooms. Cameras concealed in bathroom fixtures, vents, or objects
- Hidden cameras in bedrooms. Cameras in guest rooms, hotel rooms, or rental properties
- Hidden cameras in changing rooms. Retail fitting room cameras or gym locker room cameras
- Hidden cameras in workplaces. Cameras in employee bathrooms, changing areas, or private offices without consent
- Hidden cameras in medical facilities. Unauthorized cameras in examination rooms or patient areas
- Hidden cameras in homes by landlords. Cameras placed inside a tenant's private living space
- Nanny cameras without proper limits. Cameras placed in a nanny's designated private spaces (bathroom, bedroom)
Distribution of Hidden Camera Recordings
O.C.G.A. § 16-11-62(6) creates a separate felony for distributing recordings made in violation of the statute. Selling, giving, or distributing photographs, videotapes, or recordings of activities in private places without all-party consent carries its own 1 to 5 year prison sentence and up to $10,000 in fines.
This means that posting hidden camera footage on the internet, sharing it through social media, sending it by text or email, or providing it to any third party constitutes a separate criminal offense.
How Multiple Charges Stack
Charging Under Multiple Statutes
Georgia prosecutors can charge a single act of voyeuristic surveillance under multiple statutes. Consider this scenario: someone places a hidden camera in a hotel bathroom to record guests. That single act could result in:
- Peeping Tom (O.C.G.A. § 16-11-61) for going on the premises of another to invade their privacy
- Recording in a private place (O.C.G.A. § 16-11-62(2)) for using a device to record activities in a private place without consent
- Voyeurism by device (O.C.G.A. § 16-11-91) if the camera captured images underneath or through clothing
- Distribution (O.C.G.A. § 16-11-62(6)) if the recordings were shared
Each charge carries its own felony penalty of 1 to 5 years. If convicted on all four counts, sentences can run consecutively, potentially resulting in 4 to 20 years of imprisonment.
Multiple Victims
Each person recorded without consent represents a separate offense. If a hidden camera recorded 10 different people in a bathroom, the perpetrator could face 10 separate counts of recording in a private place, each carrying its own 1 to 5 year sentence.
Sex Offender Registration
When Registration Is Required
Georgia's Sex Offender Registry requirements under O.C.G.A. § 42-1-12 can apply to certain voyeurism convictions. The Georgia Bureau of Investigation maintains the Georgia Sex Offender Registry.
Voyeurism convictions involving minors are particularly likely to trigger registration requirements. A conviction for using a hidden camera to record a minor in a private place can result in mandatory sex offender registration, which carries lifelong consequences including:
- Public listing on the sex offender registry
- Residential restrictions (cannot live within a specified distance of schools, childcare facilities, or certain public areas)
- Employment restrictions
- Periodic registration and verification requirements
- Community notification
Registration Duration
Georgia sex offender registration requirements vary based on the offense classification and risk level. Some voyeurism-related offenses require lifetime registration, while others may allow removal from the registry after a specified period.
Detecting Hidden Cameras
Physical Inspection
If you suspect hidden cameras in a space where you have a reasonable expectation of privacy:
- Check common hiding spots. Smoke detectors, alarm clocks, power outlets, air fresheners, picture frames, stuffed animals, tissue boxes, and toiletry containers are common hiding spots.
- Look for unusual objects. Any object that seems out of place, newly installed, or oddly positioned could conceal a camera.
- Check for small holes. Pinhole cameras can be hidden behind tiny holes in walls, ceilings, or objects.
- Examine light indicators. Some cameras have small LED lights that may be visible in darkness.
Electronic Detection
- RF (Radio Frequency) detectors. These devices scan for wireless signals that hidden cameras use to transmit footage. Many consumer-grade RF detectors are available for under $100.
- Lens finders. These devices use light reflection to locate camera lenses, even tiny pinhole lenses.
- Wi-Fi network scanning. Check available Wi-Fi networks for unfamiliar devices. Some hidden cameras create their own network or connect to the property's Wi-Fi.
- Infrared scanning. Many cameras use infrared LEDs for night vision. Your phone camera may be able to detect these (front cameras on most smartphones can see infrared light).
What to Do If You Find a Hidden Camera
- Do not touch or remove the camera. It is evidence of a crime.
- Photograph the camera's position and surroundings. Document exactly where and how it is placed.
- Call law enforcement immediately. Hidden cameras in private places constitute a felony in Georgia.
- Leave the area if possible. Protect yourself from further recording.
- Preserve any additional evidence. Note the time, date, property address, and any other relevant details.
- Consult an attorney. A lawyer can advise you on both criminal and civil remedies.
Civil Remedies for Victims
Lawsuits Against Perpetrators
Victims of voyeurism and hidden camera offenses in Georgia can pursue civil litigation for:
- Invasion of privacy (intrusion upon seclusion). Georgia recognizes the tort of intrusion upon seclusion, which covers intentional intrusion into someone's private affairs in a manner that would be highly offensive to a reasonable person.
- Intentional infliction of emotional distress. The psychological impact of discovering hidden cameras can be severe, and victims can seek damages for emotional suffering.
- Negligent infliction of emotional distress. In some cases, property owners who failed to secure their premises against hidden camera installation may face negligence claims.
- Federal Wiretap Act damages. Under 18 U.S.C. § 2520, victims can recover the greater of actual damages or $10,000 per violation, plus punitive damages and attorney fees.
- Punitive damages. Georgia courts can award punitive damages in cases involving willful misconduct, malice, or wantonness.
Injunctive Relief
Courts can issue injunctions ordering:
- Removal and destruction of hidden cameras
- Deletion of all recordings
- Prohibition on further surveillance
- No-contact orders between the perpetrator and victim
Liability of Property Owners
In some cases, property owners (hotels, landlords, Airbnb hosts) who knew or should have known about hidden cameras on their property may face liability. Failure to inspect for hidden cameras or respond to complaints about suspected surveillance can support negligence claims.
Georgia vs. Federal Voyeurism Laws
The Federal Video Voyeurism Prevention Act
The federal Video Voyeurism Prevention Act (18 U.S.C. § 1801) prohibits photographing or recording the private area of an individual without consent in circumstances where the person has a reasonable expectation of privacy. This federal law applies on federal property (military bases, federal buildings, national parks) and supplements Georgia's state statutes.
Interstate and Online Distribution
Federal law also comes into play when voyeuristic recordings are distributed across state lines or through the internet. Federal charges can be added to state charges, increasing the total potential penalties.
More Georgia Recording Laws
Audio Recording | Video Recording | Voyeurism & Hidden Cameras | Workplace Recording | Recording Police | Phone Call Recording | Security Cameras | Recording in Public | Landlord-Tenant | Dashcam Laws | Schools | Medical Recording
Back to Georgia Recording Laws
More Georgia Recording Topics
More Georgia Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the penalty for hidden cameras in Georgia?
Hidden cameras in private places are a felony in Georgia. Under O.C.G.A. § 16-11-62(2), recording activities in a private place without all-party consent carries 1 to 5 years in prison and fines up to $10,000. The Peeping Tom statute (O.C.G.A. § 16-11-61) adds another felony charge with 1 to 5 years. Multiple charges can result in consecutive sentences.
Is upskirting illegal in Georgia?
Yes. O.C.G.A. § 16-11-91 specifically prohibits using any device to surreptitiously photograph or record underneath or through someone's clothing. This is a felony carrying 1 to 5 years in prison and fines up to $10,000. This law applies in both public and private places.
Can I be charged as a Peeping Tom in Georgia for using technology?
Yes. While the Peeping Tom statute (O.C.G.A. § 16-11-61) was originally written for physical peeping through windows, Georgia courts apply it to modern technology including cameras, drones, and other devices used to spy on people in private settings. The prosecution does not need to prove the spying was successful.
Do voyeurism convictions require sex offender registration in Georgia?
Some voyeurism convictions can trigger sex offender registration under O.C.G.A. § 42-1-12, particularly when the victim is a minor. The Georgia Bureau of Investigation maintains the Sex Offender Registry. Registration carries lifelong consequences including residential restrictions, employment limitations, and public listing.
What should I do if I find a hidden camera in Georgia?
Do not touch or remove the camera. Photograph its position and surroundings as evidence. Call law enforcement immediately because hidden cameras in private places are a felony. Leave the area if possible. Consult an attorney about both criminal prosecution of the perpetrator and your civil remedies for damages.
Updates
Repaired every O.C.G.A. citation link on this page (the prior codifier host, ga.elaws.us, is down sitewide) and fixed an arithmetic error in the stacked-sentencing example (four consecutive 1-5-year felony counts total 4 to 20 years, not 5 to 20).
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected the distribution-offense citation from O.C.G.A. § 16-11-62(4) (which is actually the telephone/telegraph interception paragraph) to the correct § 16-11-62(6) (the paragraph that actually prohibits selling, giving, or distributing recordings of private activities), fixed in both places it appeared: the Distribution of Hidden Camera Recordings section and the multi-charge stacking list.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Official Code of Georgia Annotated
§ 16-11-62Eavesdropping, surveillance, or intercepting communication which invades privacy of another; divulging private message.In forcecited in 25 of our articles
It shall be unlawful for: (1) Any person in a clandestine manner intentionally to overhear, transmit, or record or attempt to overhear, transmit, or record the private conversation of another which shall originate in any private place; (2) Any person, through the use of any device, without the
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legis.ga.gov
Cited in 94 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Kelley v. State (1998) held OCGA 16-11-62(2) reached a guardian who photographed a nude 16-year-old in the family bathroom, with no exception for family members. Burgeson v. State (1996) held a conversation recorded in a patrol car was not covered, because no reasonable expectation of privacy existed there.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Burgeson v. State (Supreme Court of Georgia 1996, 267 Ga. 102)✓Police secretly recorded two arrestees talking in the back of a patrol car. The court held a police car is much like a jail cell, with no reasonable expectation of privacy, so intercepting that conversation did not offend OCGA 16-11-62 and the tape was admissible.
- Kelley v. State (Court of Appeals of Georgia 1998, 233 Ga. App. 244)✓A guardian photographed her 16-year-old niece nude and passed out in the family bathtub. The court held OCGA 16-11-62(2) reaches any person with no family exception, that the film need not be developed, and that a jury could find the bathroom a private place.
- Dobbins v. State (Supreme Court of Georgia 1992, 262 Ga. 161)“…th the consent of one of the parties to the conversation. OCGA § 16-11-62 (1) provides that: It shall be unlawf…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 16-11-61Peeping Toms.In forcecited in 5 of our articles
(a) It shall be unlawful for any person to be a "peeping Tom" on or about the premises of another or to go about or upon the premises of another for the purpose of becoming a "peeping Tom." (b) As used in this Code section, the term "peeping Tom" means a person who peeps through windows or doors,…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2021-08-17 · Read the full text in our law library
Cited in 18 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Smith v. State (Court of Appeals of Georgia 1999, 238 Ga. App. 605)“…A jury found Donald Smith guilty of being a “peeping Tom.” OCGA § 16-11-61. His motion for new trial was denied by…”
- In the Interest of J. G. (Court of Appeals of Georgia 1988, 188 Ga. App. 856)“…appellant had committed the delinquent act of peeping Tom, OCGA § 16-11-61, the sole enumeration of error concerns…”
- Rosenthal v. Hudson (Court of Appeals of Georgia 1987, 183 Ga. App. 712)“…ut a warrant for appellee’s arrest for being a peeping Tom (OCGA § 16-11-61). When that warrant was dismissed by a…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 16-11-69Penalty for violations of part.In forcecited in 13 of our articles
Except as otherwise provided in subsection (d) of Code Section 16-11-66.1, any person violating any of the provisions of this part shall be guilty of a felony and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one nor more than five years or a fine not to exceed…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2021-08-17 · Read the full text in our law library
Cited in 8 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2019
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Rutter v. Rutter (Court of Appeals of Georgia 2012, 316 Ga. App. 894)“…a penal statute, a violation being punishable as a felony. OCGA § 16-11-69. As such, the rule of lenity is a prope…”
- Prophitt v. the State (Court of Appeals of Georgia 2016, 336 Ga. App. 262)“…The crime of invasion of privacy constitutes a felony, see OCGA § 16-11-69, and this Court has previously held tha…”
- Price v. State (Court of Appeals of Georgia 2013, 320 Ga. App. 85)“…rt order. 2 Because Price was convicted of a felony, see OCGA § 16-11-69, and sentenced to five years of confine…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 16-11-90Prohibition on nude or sexually explicit electronic transmissions.In forcecited in 7 of our articles
(a) As used in this Code section, the term: (1) "Harassment" means engaging in conduct directed at a depicted person that is intended to cause substantial emotional harm to the depicted person. (2) "Nudity" means: (A) The showing of the human male or female genitals, pubic area, or buttocks witho
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-03 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legis.ga.gov
Cited in 6 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2023
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Somerville v. White (2016) held that this Code section creates no private right of action. The Court of Appeals of Georgia reversed compensatory and punitive damages awarded to a woman whose nude photographs were emailed to her contacts, because a criminal statute enacted after July 1, 2010 must expressly provide a civil remedy.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Somerville v. White (Court of Appeals of Georgia 2016, 337 Ga. App. 414)✓A trial court found a man violated OCGA 16-11-90 by electronically transmitting nude photos of his ex-girlfriend and awarded her $500 plus $15,000 in punitive damages; the court held the criminal statute creates no private right of action and reversed both awards.
- Rogers v. Dupree (Court of Appeals of Georgia 2017, 340 Ga. App. 811)“…based on a defendant’s counterclaim for “Intentional Tort (OCGA § 16-11-90).” Somerville v. White, 337 Ga. App…”
- Joe Rogers, Jr. v. Hylton B. Dupree (Court of Appeals of Georgia 2017)“…based on a defendant’s counterclaim for “Intentional Tort (OCGA § 16-11-90).” Somerville v. White, 337 Ga. App. 41…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 16-11-91Use or installation of device to film underneath or through an individual's clothing under certain circumstances.In forcecited in 6 of our articles
(a) As used in this Code section, the term: (1) "Device" means an instrument or apparatus used for observing, photographing, videotaping, recording, or transmitting visual images, including but not limited to a camera, photographic equipment, video equipment, mobile phone, or other similar…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2021-08-17 · Read the full text in our law library
§ 16-11-92Sexual extortion.In forcecited in 3 of our articles
(a) As used in this Code section, the term: (1) "Coerce" means: (A) Exposing or threatening to expose any fact or information that if revealed would tend to subject an individual to hatred, contempt, ridicule, or economic harm; (B) Exposing or threatening to expose any photograph or video…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2021-08-17 · Read the full text in our law library
§ 42-1-12State Sexual Offender Registry.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
(a) As used in this article, the term: (1) "Address" means the street or route address of the sexual offender's residence. For purposes of this Code section, the term shall not mean a post office box. (2) "Appropriate official" means: (A) With respect to a sexual offender who is sentenced to prob
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-04 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legis.ga.gov
Cited in 137 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Jenkins v. State (Supreme Court of Georgia 2008, 284 Ga. 642)“…nces without registering his new address in accordance with OCGA § 42-1-12 as it existed at that time. The trial c…”
- Humphrey v. Wilson (Supreme Court of Georgia 2007, 282 Ga. 520)“…ct to registration as a sex offender. In this regard, under OCGA§ 42-1-12, Wilson would be required, before his r…”
- State v. Davis (Supreme Court of Georgia 2018, 303 Ga. 684)“…s to remove the requirements imposed upon sex offenders by OCGA § 42-1-12 under its constitutional power “to rem…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
United States Code Title 18
§ 1801Video voyeurismIn forcecited in 79 of our articles
Whoever, in the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, has the intent to capture an image of a private area of an individual without their consent, and knowingly does so under circumstances in which the individual has a reasonable expectation of privacy, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. In this section— the term “capture”, with respect to an image, means to videotape, photograph, film, record by any means, or broadcast; the term “broadcast” means to electronically transmit a visual image with the intent that it be viewed by a person or persons; the term “a private area of the individual” means the naked or undergarment clad genitals, pubic area, buttocks, or female breast of that individual; the term “female breast” means any portion of the female breast below the top of the areola; and the term “under circumstances in which that individual has a reasonable expectation of privacy” means— circumstances in which a reasonable person would believe that he or she could disrobe in privacy, without being concerned that an image of a private area of the individual was being captured; or circumstances in which a…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 53 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Courts have applied 18 U.S.C. 1801 mainly at its edges. United States v. Johnson (2010) read it as Congress's answer to secretly filming nudity on federal property, acquitting on a child exploitation charge instead. EPIC v. Department of Homeland Security (2011) applied the Section 1801(c) law enforcement exception to a TSA scanner claim.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- United States v. Anthony Helton (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit 2019, 944 F.3d 198)“…from this list of federal offenses is video voyeurism under 18 U.S.C. § 1801. Rather than list this statute as an enu…”
- United States v. Johnson (District Court, W.D. Missouri 2010, 719 F. Supp. 2d 1059)✓A weightlifting coach hid a camera to film minors weighing in nude; acquitting him under the child exploitation statute, the court called that conduct plain video voyeurism under section 1801, but noted the section reaches only federal maritime and territorial jurisdiction.
- Electronic Privacy Information Center v. United States Department of Homeland Security (Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit 2011, 653 F.3d 1)✓Privacy groups challenged TSA body scanners under the Video Voyeurism Prevention Act; the D.C. Circuit held the statute's exception for lawful law enforcement, correctional, or intelligence activity applied to airport screening, so the section 1801 claim failed.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 2520Recovery of civil damages authorizedIn forcecited in 115 of our articles
Except as provided in section 2511(2)(a)(ii), any person whose wire, oral, or electronic communication is intercepted, disclosed, or intentionally used in violation of this chapter may in a civil action recover from the person or entity, other than the United States, which engaged in that violation such relief as may be appropriate. In an action under this section, appropriate relief includes— such preliminary and other equitable or declaratory relief as may be appropriate; damages under subsection (c) and punitive damages in appropriate cases; and a reasonable attorney’s fee and other litigation costs reasonably incurred.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 860 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Walker v. Darby (1990) held a 2520 plaintiff need not prove the contents of intercepted conversations, only interception and a justified expectation against it. Bartnicki v. Vopper (2001) barred 2520 damages against defendants who took no part in the interception, obtained the tape lawfully, and disclosed a matter of public concern.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Jessie Walker v. Thomas E. Darby, Hugh L. Robinson, Jr., and Kenneth Day (Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit 1990, 911 F.2d 1573)✓A postal letter carrier said three supervisors wired an intercom near his workstation to listen in. Reversing summary judgment, the Eleventh Circuit held a section 2520 plaintiff can show interception without proving the contents of specific conversations.
- Gelbard v. United States (Supreme Court of the United States 1972, 408 U.S. 41)“…disclosure, or use is entitled to recover civil damages, 18 U. S. C. § 2520 . Title III also bars the use as eviden…”
- DirecTV, Inc. v. Hoa Huynh (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2007, 503 F.3d 847)“…7 U.S.C. § 605 (e)(4), or alternatively, for violations of 18 U.S.C. § 2520 (a), or alternatively, for violations o…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- O.C.G.A. § 16-11-61 - Peeping Tom Statute(law.justia.com)
- O.C.G.A. § 16-11-62 - Eavesdropping and Surveillance(law.justia.com)
- O.C.G.A. § 16-11-91 - Voyeurism by Device(law.justia.com)
- O.C.G.A. § 16-11-90 - NCII / Deepfake (2020 amendment)(law.justia.com)
- O.C.G.A. § 16-11-92 - Sexual Extortion (2021)(law.justia.com)
- Georgia Sex Offender Registry(gbi.georgia.gov).gov
- Georgia SB 539 (2022)(gov.georgia.gov).gov
- TAKE IT DOWN Act (signed May 19, 2025; platform compliance May 19, 2026)(congress.gov).gov
- 18 U.S.C. § 1801 - Federal Video Voyeurism Prevention Act(law.cornell.edu)
- 18 U.S.C. § 2520 - Recovery of Civil Damages(law.cornell.edu)
- Georgia Attorney General FAQ on Open Government(law.georgia.gov).gov