Colorado
Colorado Medical Recording Laws: Patient Rights, HIPAA, and Provider Rules
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 15, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 15, 2026. · 2 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Colorado is a one-party consent state, so a patient may record their own medical appointment under C.R.S. 18-9-303 and C.R.S. 18-9-304 without notifying the provider. HIPAA restricts how providers handle recordings but places no obligation on patients.
Quick Answer
Colorado patients can legally record their own medical appointments without telling the healthcare provider. Under C.R.S. 18-9-303 and C.R.S. 18-9-304, Colorado's one-party consent law allows any participant in a conversation to record it. Since the patient is a participant in the medical consultation, their consent is sufficient. However, healthcare facilities may have internal policies that restrict recording on their premises.
Patient Recording Rights

The Legal Basis
Colorado's one-party consent framework gives patients the legal right to record their medical appointments. The relevant statutes are:
- C.R.S. 18-9-303 (Wiretapping): Covers telehealth calls, phone consultations, and electronic communications with healthcare providers
- C.R.S. 18-9-304 (Eavesdropping): Covers in-person medical appointments and consultations
As a participant in the medical conversation, your consent satisfies the statutory requirement. You do not need to inform your doctor, nurse, or other healthcare professional that you are recording.
Why Patients Record Medical Appointments
Patients have many legitimate reasons for recording healthcare visits:
- Complex medical information: Remembering diagnosis details, medication instructions, and treatment plans
- Informed consent documentation: Preserving exactly what the provider said about risks, benefits, and alternatives
- Sharing with family caregivers: Allowing family members who could not attend to hear the provider's recommendations
- Second opinion preparation: Sharing recorded information with another provider
- Disability accommodation: Patients with hearing impairments, cognitive conditions, or language barriers may need recordings for later review
- Malpractice concerns: Documenting what was communicated during treatment decisions
- Medication management: Accurately recalling dosage instructions and drug interaction warnings
Research Supporting Patient Recording
The medical community has increasingly recognized the benefits of patient recording. Studies published in medical journals have found that patients forget 40% to 80% of medical information provided during office visits. Many healthcare organizations now encourage patients to record visits as a tool for better health outcomes and treatment adherence.
HIPAA and Patient Recording

What HIPAA Actually Covers
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) is a federal law that governs how healthcare providers, health plans, and healthcare clearinghouses handle protected health information (PHI). HIPAA places obligations on "covered entities" and their "business associates."
Critical point: HIPAA does not apply to patients. Patients are not covered entities. HIPAA does not prohibit you from recording your own medical appointment, sharing the recording with family members, or posting about your own medical experience.
Common HIPAA Misconceptions
Healthcare providers sometimes incorrectly cite HIPAA when asking patients not to record. Here are the facts:
- "HIPAA prohibits recording": False. HIPAA restricts providers' disclosure of your health information. It does not restrict your own recording.
- "You need our permission to record under HIPAA": False. HIPAA does not give providers authority over patients' recording decisions.
- "We can't let you record because of other patients' privacy": Partially valid. If your recording captures other patients' information (in a shared waiting room, for example), that raises privacy concerns, but HIPAA itself is not the reason.
When HIPAA Is Relevant to Recording
HIPAA becomes relevant when:
- The provider records you: A healthcare provider who records a patient visit creates a record containing PHI, which must be handled according to HIPAA's privacy and security rules
- Other patients' information is captured: If your recording incidentally captures other patients' conversations or information, sharing that recording could implicate their privacy rights
- Research recordings: Healthcare providers who record patients for research purposes must comply with both HIPAA and institutional review board (IRB) requirements
Healthcare Facility Policies

The Private Property Factor
While Colorado law permits patient recording, healthcare facilities are private property. As property owners, hospitals, clinics, and medical offices can establish rules about recording on their premises. This mirrors the broader principle that private property owners can restrict activities on their property.
If a facility has a no-recording policy:
- The policy does not change the legality of the recording under Colorado criminal law (the recording still does not violate C.R.S. 18-9-303 or 18-9-304)
- The facility can ask you to stop recording
- If you refuse, the facility can ask you to leave
- Refusing to leave could constitute trespass
- In non-emergency situations, the facility could decline to provide services
Balancing Patient Rights and Facility Policies
If you want to record a medical appointment but the facility prohibits it:
- Ask if an exception can be made for your personal use
- Explain that you need the recording to remember medical instructions
- Offer to record audio only (less intrusive than video)
- Ask the provider to write down key information as an alternative
- Consider switching to a provider who permits recording
Emergency Situations
In emergency rooms and urgent care settings, facility recording policies may be more strictly enforced due to the presence of multiple patients in close proximity. However, Colorado law still permits you to record your own conversations with healthcare providers, even in these settings.
Telehealth Recording
One-Party Consent Applies to Telehealth
Telehealth visits conducted by phone or video call fall under C.R.S. 18-9-303, which covers telephone and electronic communications. As a participant in the telehealth call, you can record it without notifying the provider.
This applies to:
- Phone consultations
- Video visits through platforms like Teladoc, Doxy.me, or provider portals
- Zoom or Teams calls with healthcare providers
- Chat-based telehealth interactions
Platform Recording Features
Many telehealth platforms have built-in recording features. When a provider uses the platform's recording function, all participants are typically notified. However, you can also use separate recording software or an external device to record the session under one-party consent.
Interstate Telehealth Considerations
If your telehealth provider is located in a two-party consent state, the stricter state's law may apply. When receiving telehealth services from out-of-state providers, consider informing the provider that you are recording to avoid potential legal complications.
Healthcare Provider Recording of Patients
When Providers Need Consent
Healthcare providers who want to record patients need consent in several scenarios:
- Medical records documentation: Standard clinical documentation does not typically involve audio or video recording and is governed by HIPAA
- Training and education: Recording patient interactions for medical training requires patient consent
- Research purposes: Recording for research requires informed consent and IRB approval
- Marketing and testimonials: Using patient recordings for promotional purposes requires explicit written consent
- Surgical recordings: Recording surgical procedures may require patient consent depending on the purpose
Provider Surveillance in Healthcare Facilities
Healthcare facilities can use security cameras in common areas (lobbies, hallways, parking lots) without patient consent for the video component. Cameras in:
- Patient rooms require careful consideration of privacy expectations
- Examination rooms should generally not be present or should be clearly disclosed
- Recording someone's intimate parts in a bathroom without consent is criminal invasion of privacy under C.R.S. 18-7-801
- Operating rooms may record for quality assurance with proper consent protocols
Mental Health and Therapy Recording
Recording Therapy Sessions
Patients can record their own therapy sessions in Colorado under one-party consent. However, the therapeutic relationship introduces unique considerations:
- Recording may affect the therapeutic dynamic
- Therapists may feel less candid if they know they are being recorded
- Some therapists include no-recording clauses in their treatment agreements
- The recording captures sensitive mental health information that should be stored securely
Therapist Obligations
Colorado mental health professionals have specific confidentiality obligations under C.R.S. 12-245-220 (the Mental Health Practice Act). These obligations govern the therapist's handling of patient information but do not restrict the patient's right to record their own sessions.
Recordings in Medical Malpractice Cases
Admissibility
Recordings of medical appointments made under one-party consent are generally admissible in Colorado medical malpractice cases. These recordings can be crucial for:
- Proving what the provider communicated about risks and alternatives
- Demonstrating informed consent (or lack thereof)
- Contradicting after-the-fact documentation by the provider
- Establishing the timeline of symptom disclosure
Statute of Limitations Considerations
Colorado's medical malpractice statute of limitations under C.R.S. 13-80-102.5 generally requires claims to be filed within two years of when the patient knew or should have known about the injury, with an absolute three-year limit. Recordings with timestamps help establish when events occurred.
Children and Minors
Recording Pediatric Appointments
Parents can record their children's medical appointments as participants in the conversation. This is particularly valuable for:
- Complex treatment plans for children with chronic conditions
- Multi-specialist coordination where information needs to be shared across providers
- Special education documentation where medical findings affect school services
- Divorce or custody situations where both parents need medical information
Adolescent Privacy
Colorado law grants certain healthcare privacy rights to minors in specific situations (such as reproductive health). Parents should be aware that recording in these contexts may raise additional privacy considerations for the minor.
More Colorado Recording Laws
Audio Recording | Video Recording | Voyeurism & Hidden Cameras | Workplace Recording | Recording Police | Phone Call Recording | Security Cameras | Recording in Public | Landlord-Tenant | Dashcam Laws | Schools | Medical Recording
Back to Colorado Recording Laws
More Colorado Recording Topics
More Colorado Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I record my doctor's appointment in Colorado?
Yes. Colorado's one-party consent law allows you to record any conversation you participate in. As a patient present at your own medical appointment, your consent is sufficient. You do not need to inform the healthcare provider. However, the facility may have a policy against recording on its premises.
Does HIPAA prevent me from recording my medical appointment?
No. HIPAA applies to healthcare providers and how they handle your information. It does not apply to patients. HIPAA does not prohibit you from recording your own medical visits, and a provider who claims otherwise is incorrect about the law.
Can I record a telehealth visit in Colorado?
Yes. Telehealth calls fall under C.R.S. 18-9-303, which governs electronic communications. As a participant in the telehealth visit, you can record it under one-party consent. If your provider is in a two-party consent state, consider informing them to avoid potential complications.
Can a hospital tell me I cannot record in Colorado?
A hospital can establish a no-recording policy as a private property rule. While your recording is not a crime under Colorado law, the hospital can ask you to stop or ask you to leave. In non-emergency settings, they could decline services if you refuse to comply.
Can I use a recording of my doctor as evidence in a malpractice case?
Yes. Recordings made under one-party consent are generally admissible in Colorado courts, including medical malpractice cases. The recording must be authentic and unaltered. These recordings can prove what the provider communicated about risks, treatment options, and informed consent.
Updates
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Colorado Revised Statutes, Title 18: Criminal Code
§ 18-9-304Eavesdropping prohibited - penaltyIn forcecited in 14 of our articles
(1) Any person not visibly present during a conversation or discussion commits eavesdropping if he: (a) Knowingly overhears or records such conversation or discussion without the consent of at least one of the principal parties thereto, or attempts to do so; or (b) Intentionally overhears or records such conversation or discussion for the purpose of committing, aiding, or abetting the commission of an unlawful act; or (c) Knowingly uses for any purpose, discloses, or attempts to use or disclose to any other person the contents of any such conversation or discussion while knowing or having reason to know the information was obtained in violation of this section; or (d) Knowingly aids, authorizes, agrees with, employs, permits, or intentionally conspires with any person to violate the provisions of this section. (2) Eavesdropping is a class 2 misdemeanor.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at olls.info
Also relied on in: Colorado Security Camera Laws: Residential, Commercial, and Privacy Rules, Colorado Audio Recording Laws: One-Party Consent Rules and Penalties, Colorado Laws on Recording in Public: Rights, Limits, and Exceptions
§ 18-9-303Wiretapping prohibited - penaltyIn forcecited in 16 of our articles
(1) Any person not a sender or intended receiver of a telephone or telegraph communication commits wiretapping if he: (a) Knowingly overhears, reads, takes, copies, or records a telephone, telegraph, or electronic communication without the consent of either a sender or a receiver thereof or attempts to do so; or (b) Intentionally overhears, reads, takes, copies, or records a telephone, telegraph, or electronic communication for the purpose of committing or aiding or abetting the commission of an unlawful act; or (c) Knowingly uses for any purpose or discloses to any person the contents of any such communication, or attempts to do so, while knowing or having reason to know the information was obtained in violation of this section; or (d) Knowingly taps or makes any connection with any telephone or telegraph line, wire, cable, or instrument belonging to another or with any electronic, mechanical, or other device belonging to another or installs any device whether connected or not which permits the interception of messages; or (e) Repealed.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at olls.info
Cited in 4 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2001
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Bartnicki v. Vopper (Supreme Court of the United States 2001, 532 U.S. 514)“…5-60-120 (1997); Cal. Penal Code Ann. §631 (West 1999); Colo. Rev. Stat. §18-9-303 (2000); Del. Code Ann., Tit. 11, § 133…”
- Boehner, John A. v. McDermott, James A. (Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit 1999, 191 F.3d 463)“…oncert with them); Cal.Penal Code §§ 631, 632 (West 1999); Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-9-303 (1986 & Supp.1995); Conn. Gen. Stat. §…”
- Sequa Corp. v. Lititech, Inc. (District Court, D. Colorado 1992, 807 F. Supp. 653)“…Menaman. Defendants rely on Colorado’s wiretapping statute, C.R.S. § 18-9-303, which provides in relevant part:…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Colorado Dashcam Laws: Legality, Mounting Rules, and Evidence Use, Colorado Landlord-Tenant Recording Laws: Cameras, Privacy, and Rights, Colorado Laws on Recording Police: Rights, Protections, and Body Cameras
Colorado Revised Statutes, Title 12: Professions and Occupations
§ 12-245-220Disclosure of confidential communications - definitionsIn force
(1) A licensee, registrant, or certificate holder shall not disclose, without the consent of the client, any confidential communications made by the client, or advice given to the client, in the course of professional employment. A licensee's, registrant's, or certificate holder's employee or associate, whether clerical or professional, shall not disclose any knowledge of the communications acquired in that capacity. Any person who has participated in any therapy conducted under the supervision of a licensee, registrant, or certificate holder, including group therapy sessions, shall not disclose any knowledge gained during the course of the therapy without the consent of the person to whom the knowledge relates.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at olls.info
Colorado Revised Statutes, Title 13: Courts and Court Procedure
§ 13-80-102.5Limitation of actions - medical or health careIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
(1) Except as otherwise provided in this section or section 25.5-4-307, C.R.S., no action alleging negligence, breach of contract, lack of informed consent, or other action arising in tort or contract to recover damages from any health-care institution, as defined in paragraph (a) of subsection (2) of this section, or any health-care professional, as defined in paragraph (b) of subsection (2) of this section, shall be maintained unless such action is instituted within two years after the date that such action accrues pursuant to section 13-80-108 (1), but in no event shall an action be brought more than three years after the act or omission which gave rise to the action. (2) For the purposes of this section: (a) Health-care institution means any hospital, health-care facility, dispensary, clinic, or other institution which is licensed or certified as such under the laws of this state. (b) Health-care professional means any physician, nurse, dentist, chiropractor, pharmacist, optometrist, psychologist, podiatrist, physical therapist, or other health-care practitioner who is licensed to perform such profession under the laws of this state.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at olls.info
Cited in 9 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Owens v. Okure (Supreme Court of the United States 1989, 488 U.S. 235)“…on, outrageous conduct, interference with relationships”); Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-80-102.5 (Supp. 1988) (two years for medical ma…”
- Chrisco v. Raemisch (District Court, D. Colorado 2019, 374 F. Supp. 3d 1093)“…ommended that the claim be dismissed as time-barred under Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-80-102.5 (1). Docket No. 113 at 5. II. STAND…”
- Lewis v. United States (District Court, D. Colorado 2023)“…egedly negligent act or omission, and (2) the exception in Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-80-102.5(3)(c), does not save the claim from the…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Medical Malpractice Laws in Colorado (2026): Deadlines & Caps
Explore the law
This article also draws on these acts and chapters (opening at their first section): Colorado Revised Statutes, Title 18: Criminal Code § 18-1.3-101 (Pretrial diversion - appropriation - repeal)
Related law for further reading — not part of this article’s citations.
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- C.R.S. 18-9-303 - Wiretapping Prohibited(law.justia.com)
- C.R.S. 18-9-304 - Eavesdropping Prohibited(law.justia.com)
- HHS - HIPAA Overview(hhs.gov).gov
- C.R.S. 12-245-220 - Mental Health Practice Act(law.justia.com)
- Colorado Title 18 Criminal Code(content.leg.colorado.gov).gov
- C.R.S. 13-80-102.5 - Medical Malpractice SOL(law.justia.com)