EnglishEspañol
Colorado flag

Colorado

Colorado Phone Call Recording Laws: One-Party Consent and Interstate Rules

Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 15, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 15, 2026. · 4 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Colorado Phone Call Recording Laws: One-Party Consent and Interstate Rules

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I record a phone call in Colorado without telling the other person?

Yes. Colorado is a one-party consent state under C.R.S. 18-9-303. As a participant in the call, your own consent is sufficient. You do not need to inform the other party that you are recording.

What happens if I record a call with someone in California from Colorado?

California is a two-party consent state. When calling across state lines, the stricter state law generally applies. You may need consent from all parties to legally record a Colorado-to-California call. The safest approach is to inform all parties before recording interstate calls.

Can my employer record my work phone calls in Colorado?

Yes, if the employer or an authorized representative is a party to the call. One-party consent under C.R.S. 18-9-303 applies to business calls just as it does to personal calls. Many employers also provide notice through pre-call announcements as a best practice.

Is it legal to use a call recording app in Colorado?

Yes. Call recording apps are legal to use in Colorado as long as you are a participant in the recorded call. The app is just a tool; the legality depends on whether you have one-party consent, not on the recording method.

Can I record a Zoom or Teams call in Colorado?

Yes. VoIP calls through Zoom, Microsoft Teams, Google Meet, and similar platforms are electronic communications covered by C.R.S. 18-9-303. As a participant, you can record under one-party consent. Note that some platforms notify all participants when built-in recording starts.

Updates

Corrected the Connecticut row in the interstate-call comparison table: Connecticut's criminal wiretapping law is one-party consent, and the all-party requirement is a separate civil statute (C.G.S. 52-570d), not the definitions section previously cited (C.G.S. 53a-187).

Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes

Governing law re-checked for recent changes

Corrected the wiretapping penalty under C.R.S. 18-9-303 (a Class 2 misdemeanor, not a Class 6 felony, in the KeyTakeaways and penalties table) and removed an inaccurate claim that C.R.S. 16-3-311's peace-officer recording right extends to phone calls (its text covers only in-person incidents).

Completed the C.R.S. 18-9-303 correction: the 'Cordless Telephone Exception' section no longer frames cordless-phone wiretapping as a lesser penalty or exception to a felony-level norm, since general wiretapping under the statute is itself a Class 2 misdemeanor, matching the KeyTakeaways bullet already corrected on the page.

Governing law re-checked for recent changes

Reviewed and approved by an editor

Sources and References

  1. C.R.S. 18-9-303 - Wiretapping Prohibited(law.justia.com)
  2. C.R.S. 18-9-305 - Exceptions(law.justia.com)
  3. SB 21-271 - Misdemeanor Reform(leg.colorado.gov).gov
  4. 18 U.S.C. 2511 - Federal Wiretapping(law.cornell.edu)
  5. Colorado Department of Labor and Employment(cdle.colorado.gov).gov
  6. Colorado Division of Insurance(doi.colorado.gov).gov
  7. Colorado Title 18 Criminal Code(content.leg.colorado.gov).gov
  8. C.R.S. 16-3-311 - Peace Officer Incident Recordings(law.justia.com)
Share: