South Carolina
South Carolina Medical Recording Laws: Patient Rights, HIPAA, and Consent (2026)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 15, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 15, 2026. · 9 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

In South Carolina, a patient may record their own medical appointment without informing the provider. S.C. Code Ann. § 17-30-30 makes South Carolina a one-party consent state, so a patient who participates in the conversation satisfies the consent requirement. HIPAA governs how providers handle health records and does not restrict patients from recording their own visits.
South Carolina is a one-party consent state for recording conversations. Under S.C. Code Ann. § 17-30-30, a person who is a party to a wire, oral, or electronic communication may lawfully record that conversation without notifying or obtaining consent from any other participant. For patients, this means recording your own medical appointments, consultations, and healthcare interactions is legal under state wiretapping law.
This guide covers patient recording rights under South Carolina law, the relationship between HIPAA and patient recordings, healthcare facility policies, telehealth recording rules, mental health considerations, and how medical recordings can serve as evidence in legal proceedings. This is general legal information, not legal advice. Consult an attorney for advice specific to your situation.
Patient Recording Rights in South Carolina
Can You Record Your Doctor in South Carolina?
Yes. South Carolina's one-party consent law permits patients to record their own medical encounters. Because you are a party to the conversation with your doctor, nurse, specialist, or other healthcare provider, you satisfy the consent requirement under § 17-30-30. You do not need to inform your provider that you are recording.
This right applies to audio recordings of conversations. Video recording in medical settings raises additional considerations, particularly around the privacy of other patients and staff in shared areas. South Carolina's voyeurism statute (S.C. Code Ann. § 16-17-470) prohibits recording people in places where they have a reasonable expectation of privacy for the purpose of invading their privacy.
Why Patients Record Medical Visits
Research consistently shows that patients forget 40 to 80 percent of medical information shortly after leaving an appointment. Recording serves practical purposes that benefit both patients and providers.
Common reasons patients record include reviewing complex diagnoses and treatment plans at home, sharing provider instructions with family members who could not attend, documenting informed consent discussions before procedures, and preserving a record of medication instructions and dosage changes. Patients managing chronic conditions or facing serious diagnoses often find recordings particularly valuable for processing information at their own pace.
Types of Medical Encounters You Can Record
Under one-party consent, South Carolina patients can record a wide range of medical interactions, including:
- Primary care visits and annual physicals
- Specialist consultations and second opinions
- Pre-surgical informed consent discussions
- Nursing instructions about medications and care plans
- Pharmacy consultations about prescriptions and drug interactions
- Hospital bedside conversations with attending physicians
- Discharge planning discussions and follow-up instructions
- Medical billing conversations about charges and insurance coverage
The key requirement is that you must be a participant in the conversation. You cannot leave a hidden recording device in an examination room to capture conversations happening without you present.
HIPAA and Patient Recording

What HIPAA Does and Does Not Do
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) is a federal law that governs how healthcare providers, health plans, and their business associates handle protected health information (PHI). Understanding what HIPAA actually covers is critical for patients who want to record.
HIPAA does not prohibit patients from recording their own medical appointments. The law applies to "covered entities" (healthcare providers, health plans, and clearinghouses) and their business associates. Patients are not covered entities. Your right to record your own conversations comes from South Carolina state law, and HIPAA has no bearing on that right.
Some providers incorrectly cite HIPAA as grounds to prohibit patient recording. This reflects a misunderstanding of the law. HIPAA restricts what providers can do with your health information; it does not restrict what you can do during your own medical encounter.
HIPAA and Provider Recording
When a healthcare provider records a patient encounter, HIPAA applies to that recording because it contains PHI created by a covered entity. The provider must store, handle, and disclose the recording in compliance with HIPAA's Privacy and Security Rules. Providers who record patient encounters typically need patient authorization and must include the recording in the patient's designated record set, giving the patient the right to access it under 45 CFR § 164.524.
Healthcare Facility Recording Policies

Can a Hospital or Clinic Prohibit Recording?
Healthcare facilities in South Carolina can establish internal recording policies. These policies do not override state wiretapping law. A recording made by a patient under one-party consent remains legal even if it violates the facility's policy. However, facility policies carry practical consequences.
A non-emergency provider may refuse to continue an appointment if a patient records against the facility's policy. The provider-patient relationship is generally voluntary, and a provider can set conditions for continued care. Emergency care providers, however, cannot refuse to treat patients under EMTALA (the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act) regardless of recording.
Common Facility Recording Policies
Many South Carolina hospitals and medical practices have policies addressing recording. These policies vary widely. Some facilities prohibit all recording in clinical areas. Others allow audio recording but restrict video. Some have no formal policy at all.
Facilities that restrict recording typically cite concerns about other patients' privacy, disruption to clinical workflows, and liability. These are internal business policies, not legal prohibitions. A patient who records in violation of a facility policy may face consequences related to their care relationship but has not committed a crime under South Carolina law.
Best Practices for Patients
Patients who wish to record their medical appointments in South Carolina may consider informing their provider beforehand. While disclosure is not legally required, it can preserve the therapeutic relationship and avoid conflict during the appointment. Some providers respond more positively when they understand the patient's reasons, such as wanting to review instructions at home or share information with a caregiver.
If a provider objects, patients can explain their reasons, ask the provider to document the objection in the medical record, or seek care from a provider who permits recording.
Recording Other Patients in Healthcare Settings

Privacy in Waiting Rooms and Common Areas
Recording in hospital waiting rooms, lobbies, and other shared spaces presents privacy risks. While one-party consent covers conversations you participate in, recording in common areas may capture other patients' identifiable health information, including their names, conditions, or conversations with staff.
South Carolina's voyeurism statute (§ 16-17-470) prohibits recording people in places where they have a reasonable expectation of privacy for the purpose of invading their privacy. Medical examination rooms and treatment areas qualify as places with a reasonable expectation of privacy for the patients being treated there.
Patients should limit recordings to their own medical conversations and avoid capturing other patients' information whenever possible.
Recording Staff and Other Employees
Recording your own conversations with medical staff (doctors, nurses, technicians, billing representatives) falls within one-party consent protection. You do not need staff permission to record a conversation you are participating in. However, recording staff conversations that you are not part of would not be covered by one-party consent and could violate the wiretapping statute.
Telehealth Recording in South Carolina
Patient Recording of Telehealth Visits
South Carolina patients can record telehealth appointments under the same one-party consent rules that apply to in-person visits. Under the South Carolina Telemedicine Act (S.C. Code Ann. § 40-47-37), providers who deliver care via telemedicine must meet the same standard of care as in-person visits. The recording law applies equally to both settings.
Patients can use screen recording software, a second device to capture audio, or the telehealth platform's built-in recording features if available. Some telehealth platforms have terms of service that address recording, but violating a platform's terms does not make the recording illegal under South Carolina law.
Provider Recording of Telehealth Visits
Providers who record telehealth sessions must comply with HIPAA and state privacy requirements. The recording becomes part of the patient's medical record and must be handled accordingly. Many telehealth platforms automatically notify participants when recording is active, which satisfies consent requirements. Providers should inform patients if the session will be recorded, though under one-party consent, the provider (as a participant) can also lawfully record.
Cross-State Telehealth Recording
When a South Carolina patient has a telehealth visit with a provider in another state, the recording law question becomes more complex. If the provider is located in a two-party consent state (such as Florida or California), that state's stricter law could apply to the provider's end of the communication. Courts have not definitively resolved which state's law controls in interstate telehealth recording scenarios. The safest approach for patients connecting with out-of-state providers is to inform the provider about the recording.
Mental Health Recording Considerations
Therapy and Counseling Sessions
South Carolina's one-party consent law applies to therapy and counseling sessions the same way it applies to any other conversation. A patient participating in a therapy session can lawfully record that session without the therapist's knowledge or consent.
However, mental health recording raises unique clinical considerations. Many therapists strongly discourage recording because it may alter the therapeutic dynamic, inhibit candor from both parties, and potentially interfere with treatment effectiveness. Some therapists may refuse to continue treatment if a patient insists on recording.
South Carolina provides specific confidentiality protections for mental health patients under S.C. Code Ann. § 44-22-100. This statute requires that records identifying mentally ill patients or individuals whose commitment has been sought remain confidential. Violations carry penalties of up to $500 in fines and one year of imprisonment. These protections apply to providers and facilities, not to patients recording their own sessions.
Psychiatric Facilities
Patients in psychiatric facilities retain their one-party consent right to record conversations they participate in with staff and providers. However, psychiatric facilities may impose stricter recording restrictions as part of their treatment protocols, and the practical dynamics differ from outpatient settings.
Federal protections under 42 CFR Part 2 provide additional confidentiality for substance use disorder treatment records. These protections are stricter than HIPAA and restrict provider disclosure of substance abuse treatment information. Like HIPAA, these rules govern providers, not patients recording their own treatment.
Using Medical Recordings as Evidence
Medical Malpractice Cases
South Carolina medical malpractice claims require the plaintiff to file, along with the complaint, an affidavit from an expert witness identifying at least one negligent act or omission by the provider, as required by S.C. Code Ann. § 15-36-100. Recordings of medical appointments can provide valuable evidence in these cases.
A recording may document what a provider communicated about risks and alternatives, whether informed consent was adequately obtained, specific statements about the patient's condition, and any discrepancies between what was said during the visit and what appears in the medical record.
Personal Injury Cases
Recordings of medical evaluations can also support personal injury and workers' compensation claims. Independent medical examinations (IMEs) ordered by insurance companies are particularly important to document, as the examiner is hired by the opposing party. Recording preserves exactly what questions were asked and what responses were given.
Admissibility
Medical recordings made lawfully under South Carolina's one-party consent statute are generally admissible in court proceedings. The recording must be authenticated (someone must testify that it is a true and accurate recording), relevant to the issues in the case, and not unduly prejudicial. South Carolina courts apply the South Carolina Rules of Evidence to determine admissibility on a case-by-case basis.
South Carolina Recording Laws by Topic
Audio Recording | Dashcam Laws | Landlord-Tenant | Phone Call Recording | Recording Police | Recording in Public | Schools | Security Cameras | Video Recording | Voyeurism & Hidden Cameras | Workplace Recording
Back to South Carolina Recording Laws
More South Carolina Recording Topics
More South Carolina Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I legally record my doctor in South Carolina?
Yes. South Carolina is a one-party consent state under S.C. Code Ann. § 17-30-30. As a participant in the conversation, you can record your medical appointment without informing your provider. HIPAA does not prohibit patients from recording their own visits.
Does HIPAA prevent patients from recording medical appointments?
No. HIPAA governs healthcare providers and their handling of protected health information. It does not apply to patients. Your right to record comes from South Carolina state law, and HIPAA has no bearing on that right.
Can a South Carolina hospital ban me from recording?
A hospital can have an internal recording policy, but it cannot make your recording illegal under state law. Non-emergency providers may refuse to continue treatment if you record against their policy. Emergency providers must treat you regardless under EMTALA.
Can I record a telehealth visit in South Carolina?
Yes. Telehealth appointments follow the same one-party consent rules as in-person visits. You can use screen recording software, a second device, or other methods. If your provider is in a two-party consent state, consider informing them about the recording.
Are medical recordings admissible in court in South Carolina?
Recordings made lawfully under one-party consent are generally admissible in South Carolina courts. The recording must be authenticated, relevant, and not unduly prejudicial. They can support medical malpractice, personal injury, and workers' compensation claims.
Updates
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected the medical malpractice citation from S.C. Code § 15-79-110 (a definitions-only section) to S.C. Code § 15-36-100, the section that actually requires an expert affidavit filed with the complaint.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
South Carolina Code of Laws, Title 17: CRIMINAL PROCEDURES
§ 17-30-30Interception by employee of Federal Communications Commission, by person acting under color or law, and when party has given prior consentIn forcecited in 16 of our articles
(A) It is lawful under this chapter for an officer, employee, or agent of the Federal Communications Commission, in the normal course of his employment and in discharge of the monitoring responsibilities exercised by the commission in the enforcement of 47 U.S.C. Chapter 5, to intercept a wire, oral, or electronic communication transmitted by radio or to disclose or use the information thereby obtained. (B) It is lawful under this chapter for a person acting under color of law to intercept a wire, oral, or electronic communication, where the person is a party to the communication or one of the parties to the communication has given prior consent to the interception. (C) It is lawful under this chapter for a person not acting under color of law to intercept a wire, oral, or electronic communication where the person is a party to the communication or where one of the parties to the communication has given prior consent to the interception.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at scstatehouse.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- McNeely (District Court, D. South Carolina 2025)“…a showing. The South Carolina statute cited by Plaintiff—S.C. Code § 17-30-30—provides “it is lawful . . . for a per…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: South Carolina AI Meeting Recording Laws (2026), South Carolina Smart Glasses Recording Laws 2026, South Carolina Recording Laws (2026): One-Party Consent Rules
South Carolina Code of Laws, Title 15: CIVIL REMEDIES AND PROCEDURES
§ 15-36-100Complaint in actions for damages alleging professional negligence; contemporaneous affidavit of expert specifying negligent act or omissionIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
(A) As used in this section, "expert witness" means an expert who is qualified as to the acceptable conduct of the professional whose conduct is at issue and who: (1) is licensed by an appropriate regulatory agency to practice his or her profession in the location in which the expert practices or teaches; and (2)(a) is board certified by a national or international association or academy which administers written and oral examinations for certification in the area of practice or specialty about which the opinion on the standard of care is offered; or (b) has actual professional knowledge and experience in the area of practice or specialty in which the opinion is to be given as the result of having been regularly engaged in: (i) the active practice of the area of specialty of his or her profession for at least three of the last five years immediately preceding the opinion; (ii) the teaching of the area of practice or specialty of his or her profession for at least half of his or her professional time as an employed member of the faculty of an educational institution which is accredited in the teaching of his or her profession for at least three of the last five years…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at scstatehouse.gov
Cited in 44 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Charles Blanchard v. 480 King Street, LLC (Supreme Court of South Carolina 2026)“…lable evidence at the time of the filing of the affidavit." S.C. Code Ann. § 15-36-100(B). Subsection 15-36-100(A) defines an…”
- Brouwer v. Sisters of Charity Providence Hospitals (Supreme Court of South Carolina 2014, 409 S.C. 514)“…is needed to evaluate the conduct of the defendant. S.C. Code Ann. § 15-36-100(C)(2) (Supp. 2013) (emphasis added).…”
- Eades v. Palmetto Cardiovascular & Thoracic, PA (Supreme Court of South Carolina 2018, 422 S.C. 196)“…ased upon my education, training, and experience. S.C. Code § 15-36-100(A)(3). To qualify under this provision,…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Medical Malpractice Laws in South Carolina (2026): Caps
South Carolina Code of Laws, Title 16: CRIMES AND OFFENSES
§ 16-17-470Eavesdropping, peeping, voyeurismIn forcecited in 9 of our articles
(A) It is unlawful for a person to be an eavesdropper or a peeping tom on or about the premises of another or to go upon the premises of another for the purpose of becoming an eavesdropper or a peeping tom. The term "peeping tom", as used in this section, is defined as a person who peeps through windows, doors, or other like places, on or about the premises of another, for the purpose of spying upon or invading the privacy of the persons spied upon and any other conduct of a similar nature, that tends to invade the privacy of others. The term "peeping tom" also includes any person who employs the use of video or audio equipment for the purposes set forth in this section. A person who violates the provisions of this section is guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction, must be fined not more than five hundred dollars or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at scstatehouse.gov
Cited in 8 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):United States v. Anthony Helton (2019) read the section's voyeurism subsection to require knowingly viewing a person without consent, where privacy is expected, for sexual arousal or gratification, and held that conviction a sex offense requiring federal registration. State v. Harris (1987) held peeping tom a crime of moral turpitude.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Holmes (Supreme Court of South Carolina 1995, 320 S.C. 259)✓At a capital murder trial the defense was barred from impeaching a jailhouse witness with his 1984 Peeping Tom conviction; the court held that was error because a section 16-17-470 violation is a crime of moral turpitude, but found the error harmless.
- State v. Harris (Supreme Court of South Carolina 1987, 293 S.C. 75)✓A man tried for assault with intent to commit sexual conduct with a minor was impeached with a prior Peeping Tom conviction; the court held the section 16-17-470 offense is a crime of moral turpitude, so using it to attack his credibility was proper.
- In re Parrott (Supreme Court of South Carolina 2017, 421 S.C. 105)“…ondent was arrested and charged with voyeurism pursuant to S.C. Code Ann. § 16-17-470 (B) (2015) after he used a cell phone t…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: South Carolina Drone Laws: 2027 Prison-Drone Act & Privacy Rules, South Carolina Employee Monitoring Laws: Workplace Surveillance and Social Media (2026), South Carolina Ring Doorbell Laws: What You Need to Know in 2026
South Carolina Code of Laws, Title 40: PROFESSIONS AND OCCUPATIONS
§ 40-47-37Practice of telemedicine, requirementsIn force
(A) A licensee who provides care, renders a diagnosis, or otherwise engages in the practice of medicine as defined in Section 40-47-20(36) via telemedicine as defined in Section 40-47-20(53) shall: (1) adhere to the same standard of care as in-person medical care and be evaluated according to the standard of care applicable to the licensee's area of specialty. The failure of a licensee to conform to the appropriate standard of care is considered unprofessional conduct under Section 40-47-110(B)(9); (2) generate and maintain medical records for such telemedicine services in compliance with any applicable state and federal laws, rules, and regulations including this chapter, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), and the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH).
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at scstatehouse.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Opternative v. South Carolina Optometric Physicians Association (Supreme Court of South Carolina 2026)“…June 3, 2016. Act No. 210, 2016 S.C. Acts 1502 (codified at S.C. Code Ann. § 40-47-37 (Supp. 2025)). The Telemedicine Act mad…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
South Carolina Code of Laws, Title 44: HEALTH
§ 44-22-100Confidentiality of records; exceptions; violations and penaltiesIn force
(A) Certificates, applications, records, and reports made for the purpose of this chapter or Chapter 9, Chapter 11, Chapter 13, Chapter 15, Chapter 17, Chapter 20, Chapter 23, Chapter 24, Chapter 25, Chapter 27, or Chapter 52, and directly or indirectly identifying a mentally ill or alcohol and drug abuse patient or former patient or individual whose commitment has been sought, must be kept confidential, and must not be disclosed unless: (1) the individual identified or the individual's guardian consents; (2) a court directs that disclosure is necessary for the conduct of proceedings before the court and that failure to make the disclosure is contrary to public interest; (3) disclosure is required for research conducted or authorized by the Office of Mental Health or the Office of Substance Use Services and with the patient's consent; (4) disclosure is necessary to cooperate with law enforcement, health, welfare, and other state or federal agencies, or when furthering the welfare of the patient or the patient's family; (5) disclosure to a court of competent jurisdiction is necessary for the limited purpose of providing a court order to SLED in order to submit information to…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at scstatehouse.gov
Cited in 4 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2019
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Blackwell (Supreme Court of South Carolina 2017, 420 S.C. 127)“…re to make the disclosure is contrary to public interest.” S.C. Code Ann. § 44-22-100 (A)(2) (Supp. 2015). However, the court…”
- State v. Smith (Supreme Court of South Carolina 1995, 322 S.C. 215)“…upp. 1994), 2 is required by law to be kept confidential. S.C. Code Ann. § 44-22-100 (Supp. 1994). Section 44-22-100 provid…”
- McMakin v. Bruce Hospital System (Supreme Court of South Carolina 1995, 318 S.C. 15)“…DISCUSSION Under State law, disclosure is governed by S.C. Code Ann. § 44-22-100 (Supp. 1993), which provides in pertin…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Code of Federal Regulations Title 45
§ 164.524Access of individuals to protected health information.In forcecited in 23 of our articles
(a) Standard: Access to protected health information —(1) Right of access. Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (a)(2) or (a)(3) of this section, an individual has a right of access to inspect and obtain a copy of protected health information about the individual in a designated record set, for as long as the protected health information is maintained in the designated record set, except for: (i) Psychotherapy notes; and (ii) Information compiled in reasonable anticipation of, or for use in, a civil, criminal, or administrative action or proceeding. (2) Unreviewable grounds for denial. A covered entity may deny an individual access without providing the individual an opportunity for review, in the following circumstances. (i) The protected health information is excepted from the right of access by paragraph (a)(1) of this section.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ecfr.gov
Cited in 88 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Webb v. Smart Document Solutions, LLC (2007) held the reduced, cost-based fee in section 164.524(c)(4) applies only when the individual himself requests his records, not a law firm acting as his agent. Ciox Health, LLC v. Hargan (2020) vacated 2016 guidance that extended that patient rate to third-party directives.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Webb v. Smart Document Solutions, LLC (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2007, 499 F.3d 1078)✓A law firm ordered its client's hospital records and was billed a copying company's higher third-party rate; the Ninth Circuit held Section 164.524(c)(4)'s cost-based fee limit applies only when the individual or a personal representative asks, not an attorney acting as agent.
- Evenson v. Hartford Life & Annuity Insurance (District Court, M.D. Florida 2007, 244 F.R.D. 666)✓A therapist refused a subpoena for her psychotherapy notes, citing Section 164.524(a)(1)'s exclusion of those notes from a patient's right of access; the court held that exclusion governs only individual access, not discovery, and ordered the notes produced.
- Ciox Health, LLC v. Hargan (District Court, District of Columbia 2020)“…fee that can be charged for such production. See generally 45 C.F.R. § 164.524. For requests brought by an individual…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: How Long Do Hospitals Keep Medical Records? (2026), How to Find Old Medical Records Online, Medical Records Retention Laws by State (2026 Guide)
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- S.C. Code Ann. § 17-30-30 - Interception when party has given prior consent(scstatehouse.gov).gov
- HIPAA - Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act(hhs.gov).gov
- HHS - Your Rights Under HIPAA(hhs.gov).gov
- S.C. Code Ann. § 16-17-470 - Eavesdropping, peeping, voyeurism(law.justia.com)
- S.C. Code Ann. § 44-22-100 - Mental health patient records confidentiality(scstatehouse.gov).gov
- S.C. Code Ann. § 40-47-37 - Practice of telemedicine requirements(law.justia.com)
- 42 CFR Part 2 - Substance Use Disorder Patient Records(ecfr.gov).gov
- S.C. Code Ann. § 15-36-100 - Expert Affidavit Requirement in Professional Negligence Actions(scstatehouse.gov).gov
- S.C. Code Ann. § 44-115 - Physicians Patient Records Act(scstatehouse.gov).gov
- S.C. Code Ann. § 16-17-470 - Eavesdropping, peeping, voyeurism(scstatehouse.gov).gov
- S.C. Code Ann. § 40-47-37 - Practice of telemedicine requirements(scstatehouse.gov).gov