North Carolina
North Carolina Surveillance Camera Laws (2026 Guide)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 16, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 16, 2026. · 6 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

title: "North Carolina Surveillance Camera Laws" description: "Learn about North Carolina surveillance camera laws covering home security cameras, workplace monitoring, hidden cameras, voyeurism penalties, audio recording rules, and neighbor disputes."
Key Takeaways
- North Carolina does not have a single statute that directly regulates video-only surveillance cameras on private property. Instead, a combination of criminal statutes, wiretapping laws, and common law privacy principles govern camera use.
- Video recording without audio is generally legal in areas where people do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy.
- Audio recording follows a one-party consent rule under N.C. Gen. Stat. 15A-287. At least one party to a conversation must consent before any audio is captured.
- Hidden cameras that record people in private spaces such as bathrooms, bedrooms, or dressing rooms violate the secret peeping statute, N.C. Gen. Stat. 14-202, and carry penalties ranging from a Class 1 misdemeanor to a Class H felony.
- Neighbors who feel targeted by a surveillance camera aimed at their private spaces may pursue a civil claim for intrusion upon seclusion. Anyone whose image is captured or disseminated in violation of N.C. Gen. Stat. 14-202 also has a separate statutory civil action under subsection (k) for actual damages, punitive damages, and attorney fees.

Overview of North Carolina Surveillance Camera Law
North Carolina does not have one overarching surveillance camera statute the way some states do. Instead, the legality of surveillance cameras in the state depends on several overlapping areas of law.
The primary legal frameworks that affect surveillance camera use in North Carolina include the Electronic Surveillance Act (N.C. Gen. Stat. Chapter 15A, Article 16), the secret peeping statute (N.C. Gen. Stat. 14-202), common law privacy torts recognized by North Carolina courts, and federal constitutional protections under the Fourth Amendment.
The single most important concept across all of these laws is the reasonable expectation of privacy. Recording in spaces where people reasonably expect to be free from observation, such as bathrooms, bedrooms, and changing areas, is almost always illegal. Recording in public areas, front porches, driveways, and common spaces is generally permitted.
Home Security Cameras
Homeowners in North Carolina have broad rights to install security cameras on their own property. There is no state law that prohibits placing cameras on the exterior or interior of your home for security purposes.
You may place cameras on your front porch, at your front door, in your driveway, and in common areas of your home without violating any state statute. These are considered areas where visitors and passersby do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy.
Where You Cannot Place Home Cameras
Even within your own home, there are limits. Under N.C. Gen. Stat. 14-202, it is illegal to use a camera or any photographic imaging device to secretly record a person in a room where they have a reasonable expectation of privacy. The statute defines "room" to include bedrooms, bathrooms, showers, and dressing rooms, though the definition is not limited to those spaces.
This means that if you have guests staying in your home, you cannot legally place a hidden camera in the guest bedroom or bathroom. The same rule applies to any person who enters a private space in your home with a reasonable expectation that they are not being recorded.
Audio Considerations for Home Cameras
Many modern home security cameras, including popular doorbell cameras from Ring and similar manufacturers, record audio as well as video. In North Carolina, capturing audio adds an additional layer of legal consideration.
Under the North Carolina Electronic Surveillance Act (N.C. Gen. Stat. 15A-287), it is a Class H felony to intercept any wire, oral, or electronic communication without the consent of at least one party to that communication. North Carolina follows a one-party consent rule, which means that as long as you are one of the parties involved in the conversation, you can legally record it.
For a doorbell camera, this means that if you speak with a visitor through the camera, you are a party to that conversation and may record it. However, if your camera captures conversations between third parties on the sidewalk or in a neighboring yard without any party consenting, that recording could violate the wiretapping statute.
A practical step for homeowners is to post visible signs stating that video and audio surveillance is in use. While signage does not create a legal safe harbor on its own, it puts visitors on notice and can support an argument that they impliedly consented to being recorded.
Workplace Surveillance Cameras
North Carolina does not have a state statute specifically governing employer use of surveillance cameras. Employers generally may use video surveillance in common work areas, lobbies, warehouses, retail floors, and other spaces where employees do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy.
Where Employers May Record
Employers may legally place cameras in hallways, break rooms (with some caution), loading docks, sales floors, parking lots, and building entrances. These are considered areas where workers understand they may be observed.
Where Employers May Not Record
Placing cameras in restrooms, locker rooms, lactation rooms, or any area designated for changing clothes violates N.C. Gen. Stat. 14-202. This applies regardless of the employer's intent. Even if the camera is installed for loss prevention, recording in a space where employees have a reasonable expectation of privacy is a criminal offense.
Audio Recording in the Workplace
The one-party consent rule under N.C. Gen. Stat. 15A-287 applies in the workplace just as it does elsewhere. If a security camera captures audio, at least one party to any recorded conversation must have consented.
For employers, this creates a practical challenge. If a workplace camera with audio enabled records a conversation between two employees and neither employee consented, the recording may violate the Electronic Surveillance Act. One way employers address this is by disabling audio on security cameras in employee-only areas or by posting clear signage that audio and video recording is in effect.
Federal Labor Considerations
Employers should also be aware that the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) may limit surveillance in areas where employees engage in protected organizing activity. While this is a federal issue rather than a state law matter, it can affect the legality of camera placement in certain contexts.
Hidden Cameras and Voyeurism Laws
North Carolina takes a strong stance against the use of hidden cameras for voyeurism or secret observation. The primary statute addressing this is N.C. Gen. Stat. 14-202, titled "Secretly peeping into room occupied by another person."
What the Law Prohibits
The statute creates a tiered system of offenses with increasing penalties based on the severity of the conduct.
Basic Secret Peeping (Class 1 Misdemeanor): Any person who secretly peeps into any room occupied by another person is guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor. This applies whether or not a camera is used. A Class 1 misdemeanor in North Carolina carries a potential sentence of up to 120 days in jail and a fine at the court's discretion.
Peeping Under Clothing (Class 1 Misdemeanor): Using a mirror or other device to secretly look underneath or through another person's clothing to view their body or undergarments without consent is a Class 1 misdemeanor.
Peeping While Possessing a Camera, With Intent to Record (Class A1 Misdemeanor): If a person secretly peeps into a room while in possession of a device that may be used to create a photographic image and with the intent to create a photographic image, the offense is elevated to a Class A1 misdemeanor. Both elements are required. Simply having a phone or camera on your person while peeping does not elevate the offense unless the State also proves you intended to create an image. This is the most serious misdemeanor classification in North Carolina and carries a potential sentence of up to 150 days in jail.
Recording Images for Sexual Purposes (Class I Felony): Using any device to create a photographic image of another person while secretly peeping, for the purpose of arousing or gratifying sexual desire, is a Class I felony. A Class I felony carries a sentencing range of 4 to 24 months of imprisonment.
Creating an Image of a Private Area Without Consent (Class I Felony): Under N.C. Gen. Stat. 14-202(e1), added by Session Law 2025-70 and effective for offenses committed on or after December 1, 2025, any person who knowingly creates a photographic image of another person's private area, without that person's consent, under circumstances in which the person has a reasonable expectation of privacy is guilty of a Class I felony. This subsection contains no sexual-purpose element, so hidden-camera conduct that captures a private area can be charged as a felony without any proof of sexual motive. It replaced former subsection (e), which the same act repealed.
Installing a Hidden Camera for Sexual Purposes (Class I Felony): Secretly installing any device in a room that can capture photographic images, with the intent to record another person without their consent for sexual purposes, is also a Class I felony.
Possessing Illegally Obtained Images (Class I Felony): Knowingly possessing a photographic image that was obtained in violation of the secret peeping statute is a Class I felony.
Distributing Illegally Obtained Images (Class H Felony): Disseminating images obtained through secret peeping, without the consent of the person depicted, is a Class H felony. This is the most serious penalty in the statute. A Class H felony carries a sentencing range of 5 to 20 months of imprisonment, with a maximum of 39 months.
Definition of "Room"
The statute defines "room" broadly. It includes bedrooms, bathrooms, showers, and dressing rooms, but the statute specifically notes that this list is not exhaustive. Any enclosed space where a person has a reasonable expectation of privacy can qualify.
Definition of "Photographic Image"
The statute defines "photographic image" to include photographs, videos, and digital images. This covers smartphone cameras, security cameras, body cameras, webcams, and any other device capable of capturing visual images.
Definition of "Private Area"
Because subsection (e1) turns on it, the statute defines the "private area of an individual" as that individual's naked or undergarment clad genitals, pubic area, buttocks, or female breast. The statute also defines the circumstances in which a person has a reasonable expectation of privacy: either circumstances in which a reasonable person would believe he or she could disrobe in privacy without a photographic image of a private area being created, or circumstances in which a reasonable person would believe a private area would not be visible to the public, regardless of whether that person is in a public or private place.
Repeat Offenses and Sex Offender Registration
Two provisions can substantially increase the consequences of a conviction.
Under N.C. Gen. Stat. 14-202(i), a second or subsequent conviction is punished one class higher. A second Class 1 misdemeanor is punished as a Class A1 misdemeanor, a second Class A1 misdemeanor is punished as a Class I felony, and a second or subsequent felony conviction under the section is punished as though the defendant were convicted of an offense one class higher.
Under N.C. Gen. Stat. 14-202(l), when a person violates subsection (d), (e1), (f), (g), or (h), or is convicted of a second or subsequent violation of subsection (a), (a1), or (c), the sentencing court must consider whether the person is a danger to the community and whether requiring registration as a sex offender under Article 27A would further the purposes of that Article. If the court rules that the person is a danger to the community and must register, it enters an order requiring registration. Registration is not automatic, but the court is required to take up the question.
Exemptions for Law Enforcement and Licensed Security Professionals
The statute carves out two categories of conduct.
Under subsection (m), subsections (a), (a1), (c), (e1), (g), (h), and (k) do not apply to law enforcement officers while discharging or attempting to discharge their official duties, or to personnel of the Division of Prisons of the Department of Adult Correction or of a local confinement facility acting for security purposes or during an investigation of alleged misconduct by a person in custody.
Under subsection (n), the section does not affect the legal activities of persons licensed under Chapter 74C (Private Protective Services) or Chapter 74D (Alarm Systems) who are legally engaged in the discharge of their official duties within their professions and are not acting for an improper purpose as described in the section. Homeowners hiring a licensed installer and employers using a licensed alarm company should note that this exemption protects the licensed professional's own lawful work, not the customer who directs an unlawful installation.
Civil Damages Under the Secret Peeping Statute
Beyond the criminal penalties, N.C. Gen. Stat. 14-202(k) gives any person whose image is captured or disseminated in violation of the statute a civil cause of action against anyone who captured or disseminated the image, or who procured another person to do so. A successful plaintiff is entitled to recover actual damages, punitive damages, and reasonable attorney fees and other litigation costs reasonably incurred.
This statutory claim can be easier to plead than the common law intrusion upon seclusion tort, because it does not require proving that the intrusion would be highly offensive to a reasonable person, and it expressly authorizes attorney fees. Note that the subsection (m) exemption for law enforcement and correctional personnel applies to this civil action as well.
Audio Recording and One-Party Consent
North Carolina is a one-party consent state for audio recording. This means that you may legally record a conversation as long as at least one party to that conversation has given consent to the recording. You do not need to tell the other participants.
The Electronic Surveillance Act
The governing statute is N.C. Gen. Stat. 15A-287, part of the North Carolina Electronic Surveillance Act (Article 16, Chapter 15A). The statute makes it a Class H felony to willfully intercept, or attempt to intercept, any wire, oral, or electronic communication without the consent of at least one party.
Key definitions from N.C. Gen. Stat. 15A-286:
- Oral communication means any oral communication uttered by a person exhibiting an expectation that the communication is not subject to interception, under circumstances justifying that expectation.
- Intercept means the aural or other acquisition of the contents of any wire, oral, or electronic communication through the use of any electronic, mechanical, or other device.
Criminal Penalties for Illegal Recording
Violating the Electronic Surveillance Act is a Class H felony under North Carolina law. Under the state's structured sentencing guidelines (N.C. Gen. Stat. 15A-1340.17), a Class H felony carries a presumptive sentencing range of 5 to 20 months of imprisonment, depending on the defendant's prior record level.
Civil Remedies for Illegal Recording
In addition to criminal penalties, victims of illegal wiretapping or electronic surveillance have a civil cause of action under N.C. Gen. Stat. 15A-296. A person whose communication was illegally intercepted, disclosed, or used may recover:
- Actual damages, but not less than liquidated damages computed at $100 per day for each day of violation or $1,000, whichever is higher
- Punitive damages
- Reasonable attorney fees and other litigation costs reasonably incurred
A defendant who relied in good faith on a court order or a representation from the Attorney General or a district attorney has a complete defense against both civil and criminal liability.
How One-Party Consent Affects Surveillance Cameras
The one-party consent rule has a direct impact on surveillance cameras that record audio. A video-only camera does not implicate the Electronic Surveillance Act. However, a camera with audio capability does.
If you set up a camera in your home that records audio and you are present during the conversations it captures, you are a consenting party and the recording is legal. If the camera records conversations between other people when you are not present and no party to those conversations has consented, the recording may violate the law.
This distinction matters for devices like smart doorbells, baby monitors with audio, and indoor security cameras with microphone capability. If audio is not essential for your security purposes, the safest legal approach is to disable it.
Neighbor Disputes Over Surveillance Cameras
Disputes between neighbors over security camera placement are increasingly common in North Carolina. While there is no state statute that specifically addresses neighbor-to-neighbor camera disputes, several legal principles apply.
General Rule
A homeowner may install security cameras on their own property, and those cameras may incidentally capture portions of a neighbor's property. If a camera is positioned to monitor your own driveway, front yard, or porch and happens to show part of a neighbor's yard that is visible from the street, this is generally lawful.
When Camera Placement Becomes a Legal Problem
A camera becomes legally problematic when it is specifically aimed at areas where a neighbor has a reasonable expectation of privacy. Pointing a camera directly into a neighbor's bedroom window, bathroom, or enclosed backyard behind a privacy fence could give rise to legal liability.
The Nichols v. Calhoun Decision
In Nichols v. Calhoun (No. COA24-905, 2025), the North Carolina Court of Appeals addressed a neighbor surveillance dispute directly. In that case, neighbors installed a Wi-Fi-enabled security camera aimed over a six-foot privacy fence into the other neighbors' backyard, enabling live surveillance whenever motion was detected.
The court affirmed the jury's finding that this conduct constituted intrusion upon seclusion, a recognized privacy tort in North Carolina. The court held that the context of the surveillance, including the hostile relationship between the neighbors, the continuous livestream capability, and the deliberate targeting of a private backyard, supported the conclusion that a reasonable person would find the surveillance highly offensive.
This case established that home surveillance cameras can support a civil claim for invasion of privacy when they are deliberately aimed at a neighbor's private spaces in a way that a reasonable person would consider highly offensive.
Available Legal Remedies
A neighbor who believes they are the target of unlawful surveillance may pursue several options:
- Civil lawsuit for intrusion upon seclusion: The plaintiff must show that the defendant intentionally intruded on their solitude or private affairs and that a reasonable person would find the intrusion highly offensive. Damages may include compensation for emotional distress and, in egregious cases, punitive damages.
- Criminal complaint under N.C. Gen. Stat. 14-202: If a neighbor's camera captures images of a person in a private room, the secret peeping statute may apply.
- Statutory civil action under N.C. Gen. Stat. 14-202(k): Separate from the tort claim, anyone whose image was captured or disseminated in violation of the secret peeping statute may sue whoever captured or disseminated it, or procured another person to do so, and recover actual damages, punitive damages, and reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs.
- Local ordinances and HOA rules: Some municipalities and homeowners associations in North Carolina have rules that restrict camera placement or require cameras to be oriented away from neighboring properties.
Nanny Cameras
Nanny cameras are legal in North Carolina, but they must be used within the boundaries established by the secret peeping statute and the Electronic Surveillance Act.
Video-Only Nanny Cameras
A parent may legally install a hidden video-only camera in common areas of the home, such as the living room, kitchen, or playroom, to monitor a caregiver's interactions with their children. There is no law requiring parents to disclose the camera to the caregiver, as long as the camera is placed in an area where the caregiver does not have a reasonable expectation of privacy.
Where Nanny Cameras Cannot Be Placed
Under N.C. Gen. Stat. 14-202, nanny cameras must not be placed in bathrooms, bedrooms where the caregiver may change clothes or sleep, or any other space where the caregiver has a reasonable expectation of privacy. Placing a hidden camera in such a space could result in criminal charges under the secret peeping statute, even if the camera was installed for the purpose of monitoring childcare.
Audio on Nanny Cameras
If a nanny camera records audio, the one-party consent rule under N.C. Gen. Stat. 15A-287 applies. When a parent is at home and can hear the conversations the camera picks up, the parent may be considered a consenting party. However, when the parent is away from home and the camera records conversations between the caregiver and others (or the caregiver and the child), no consenting party may be present.
The safest legal approach for nanny cameras with audio is to either disable the microphone or inform the caregiver that audio recording is in use. Many employment attorneys recommend including a surveillance disclosure in the caregiver's employment agreement.
HOA and Local Government Rules
While North Carolina state law provides the foundation for surveillance camera regulations, homeowners associations and local municipalities may impose additional restrictions.
HOA Restrictions
North Carolina HOAs have the authority to regulate camera installations through their covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs) and architectural guidelines. Common HOA rules include restrictions on camera visibility from the street, requirements that cameras be approved by an architectural review committee, prohibitions on cameras aimed at common areas or other residents' properties, and limits on the number or type of cameras permitted.
Homeowners should review their HOA governing documents before installing exterior cameras. HOA rules must comply with state and federal law, meaning an HOA cannot authorize recording in areas where state law prohibits it, but an HOA can impose stricter limitations than state law requires.
Municipal Ordinances
Some North Carolina cities and counties have local ordinances that address surveillance camera use in commercial settings, signage requirements, or data retention for businesses that operate camera systems. Homeowners and business owners should check with their local government for any applicable rules.
Penalties Summary
Understanding the penalties for surveillance-related offenses in North Carolina is important for anyone who installs or uses cameras. Below is a summary of the key offenses and their classifications.
Secret Peeping (no camera): Class 1 misdemeanor. Up to 120 days in jail and a discretionary fine.
Secret Peeping Under Clothing: Class 1 misdemeanor. Up to 120 days in jail and a discretionary fine.
Secret Peeping While Possessing a Camera, With Intent to Create an Image: Class A1 misdemeanor. Up to 150 days in jail and a discretionary fine. Possession of the device and the intent to create a photographic image are both required elements.
Recording Images While Secretly Peeping for Sexual Purposes: Class I felony. 4 to 24 months of imprisonment.
Knowingly Creating an Image of a Private Area Without Consent (no sexual purpose required, effective December 1, 2025): Class I felony. 4 to 24 months of imprisonment.
Installing a Hidden Camera for Sexual Purposes: Class I felony. 4 to 24 months of imprisonment.
Possessing Illegally Obtained Images: Class I felony. 4 to 24 months of imprisonment.
Distributing Illegally Obtained Images Without Consent: Class H felony. Minimum sentences of 5 to 20 months depending on prior record level, with corresponding maximums up to 39 months.
Illegal Wiretapping or Audio Interception: Class H felony. Minimum sentences of 5 to 20 months depending on prior record level, with corresponding maximums up to 39 months. Civil damages of at least $100 per day or $1,000, whichever is higher, plus punitive damages and attorney fees.
Two provisions sit on top of this table and can change the outcome substantially. Under N.C. Gen. Stat. 14-202(i), a second or subsequent conviction under the secret peeping statute is punished one class higher, so a repeat Class A1 misdemeanor becomes a Class I felony. Under N.C. Gen. Stat. 14-202(l), a violation of subsection (d), (e1), (f), (g), or (h), or a second or subsequent violation of subsection (a), (a1), or (c), requires the sentencing court to decide whether the defendant is a danger to the community and must register as a sex offender under Article 27A. That determination is mandatory even though registration itself is not.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I put a security camera on my front porch in North Carolina?
Yes. A front porch is a public-facing area where visitors do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy. You may install video cameras on your porch, at your front door, and in your driveway. If the camera records audio, be aware that North Carolina's one-party consent rule under N.C. Gen. Stat. 15A-287 applies to any conversations captured.
Is it legal to record my neighbor's property with my security camera?
It depends on what your camera captures. If your camera is positioned on your property and incidentally records portions of your neighbor's yard that are visible from the street, this is generally legal. However, deliberately aiming a camera at a neighbor's private spaces, such as their bedroom window or an enclosed backyard, could give rise to a civil claim for intrusion upon seclusion, as established in Nichols v. Calhoun (2025).
Do I have to tell my nanny about a hidden camera?
North Carolina law does not require you to disclose a video-only nanny camera placed in a common area of your home. However, if the camera records audio, the one-party consent rule applies. Many legal professionals recommend disclosing the camera and including a written notice in the caregiver's employment agreement to avoid potential legal issues.
Can my employer record me at work with a security camera?
Yes, in most cases. Employers in North Carolina may use video surveillance in common work areas such as lobbies, hallways, and sales floors. However, cameras are prohibited in restrooms, locker rooms, and any area where employees have a reasonable expectation of privacy. If workplace cameras record audio, the one-party consent rule under N.C. Gen. Stat. 15A-287 must be followed.
What should I do if I think someone installed a hidden camera in a private space?
If you believe a hidden camera has been placed in a bathroom, bedroom, dressing room, or other private space, contact local law enforcement. This conduct violates N.C. Gen. Stat. 14-202 and may constitute a felony offense. You may also have grounds for a civil lawsuit. Beyond the common law invasion of privacy claim, N.C. Gen. Stat. 14-202(k) gives you a statutory cause of action against whoever captured or disseminated the image, with actual damages, punitive damages, and attorney fees.
Related North Carolina Camera and Privacy Laws
- North Carolina Recording Laws covers the consent rule that governs camera audio in North Carolina.
- North Carolina Security Camera Recording Rules explains the recording-law side of camera use.
- North Carolina Biometric Privacy Laws addresses facial recognition and biometric data.
- North Carolina Ring Doorbell Laws covers video doorbell rules in North Carolina.
Common Camera Questions
These national guides answer the most common surveillance camera questions:
Updates
Updated the secret peeping section for the December 1, 2025 amendments to N.C. Gen. Stat. 14-202, adding the new subsection (e1) felony, the intent element for the Class A1 offense, the repeat-offense and sex offender registration provisions, the law enforcement and licensed security exemptions, and the statutory civil damages claims under 14-202(k) and 15A-296.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
North Carolina General Statutes, Chapter 14: Criminal Law.
§ 14-202Secretly peeping into room occupied by another personIn forcecited in 12 of our articles
(a) Any person who shall peep secretly into any room occupied by another person shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor. (a1) Unless covered by another provision of law providing greater punishment, any person who secretly or surreptitiously peeps underneath or through the clothing being worn by another person, through the use of a mirror or other device, for the purpose of viewing the body of, or the undergarments worn by, that other person without their consent shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor. (b) The following definitions apply in this section: (1) Photographic image. - Any photograph or photographic reproduction, still or moving, or any videotape, motion picture, or live television transmission, or any digital image of any individual. (2) Private area of an individual. - The naked or undergarment clad genitals, pubic area, buttocks, or female breast of that individual. (3) Room. - Includes, but is not limited to, a bedroom, a rest room, a bathroom, a shower, a dressing room, a dressing stall, a cubicle, or other similar area designed to provide privacy. (4) Under circumstances in which that individual has a reasonable expectation of privacy.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ncleg.gov
Cited in 17 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):In Matter of Banks (1978) the North Carolina Supreme Court upheld G.S. 14-202 against vagueness and overbreadth challenges, reading secret peeping to require spying intended to invade the occupant's privacy. State v. Pell (2011) applied its sex offender registration provision and reversed an order unsupported by evidence.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Matter of Banks (Supreme Court of North Carolina 1978, 295 N.C. 236)✓A trial judge held the secret peeping statute unconstitutional. The court reversed, construing the statute to reach only spying done with the wrongful purpose of invading the occupant's privacy, and held it was neither impermissibly vague nor overbroad on that reading.
- State v. Breathette (Court of Appeals of North Carolina 2010, 202 N.C. App. 697)“…any child of either sex under the age of 16 years. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-202 .l(a)(l)-(2). The statute is unambiguou…”
- State v. Pell (Court of Appeals of North Carolina 2011, 211 N.C. App. 376)✓A man pleaded guilty to eight counts of felony secret peeping and was ordered onto the sex-offender registry. The court held the danger-to-the-community standard in this section is not vague, but reversed the registration order because the risk evidence did not support it.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: North Carolina Smart Glasses Recording Laws 2026, North Carolina Audio Recording Laws: One-Party Consent Rules, North Carolina Landlord-Tenant Recording Laws: Cameras and Consent
North Carolina General Statutes, Chapter 15A: Criminal Procedure Act.
§ 15A-287Interception and disclosure of wire, oral, or electronic communications prohibitedIn forcecited in 18 of our articles
(a) Except as otherwise specifically provided in this Article, a person is guilty of a Class H felony if, without the consent of at least one party to the communication, the person: (1) Willfully intercepts, endeavors to intercept, or procures any other person to intercept or endeavor to intercept, any wire, oral, or electronic communication. (2) Willfully uses, endeavors to use, or procures any other person to use or endeavor to use any electronic, mechanical, or other device to intercept any oral communication when: a. The device is affixed to, or otherwise transmits a signal through, a wire, cable, or other like connection used in wire communications; or b. The device transmits communications by radio, or interferes with the transmission of such communications.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ncleg.gov
Cited in 12 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):North Carolina courts apply Section 15A-287 to private recording. Kroh v. Kroh (2002) held it reaches one spouse's nonconsensual audio recording of the other in the family home, not video without sound, and adopted vicarious consent by a custodial parent. State v. McGriff (2002) held interception is not willful absent a bad purpose.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. McGriff (Court of Appeals of North Carolina 2002, 151 N.C. App. 631)✓A neighbor's cordless phone picked up a call in which a girl said McGriff had tried to force oral sex on her, and she listened about an hour; the court held listening out of concern for a minor was not willful interception under Section 15A-287(a)(1), so the evidence came in.
- Wright v. TOWN OF ZEBULON (Court of Appeals of North Carolina 2010, 202 N.C. App. 540)✓A police chief hid a transmitter under a sergeant's patrol car seat to test whether he tipped off drug dealers; the court affirmed summary judgment on his Section 15A-287(a)(1) claim, finding the public safety purpose meant the interception was not willful.
- Kroh v. Kroh (Court of Appeals of North Carolina 2002, 152 N.C. App. 347)“…rs to intercept, . . . any . . . oral . . . communication.” G.S. § 15A-287(a)(l). An “oral communication” includes…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: North Carolina Video Recording Laws: Public, Private, and Voyeurism Rules, North Carolina Recording Laws (2026): One-Party Consent Rules, North Carolina Dashcam Laws: Mounting, Recording, and Evidence Rules
§ 15A-296Recovery of civil damages authorizedIn forcecited in 8 of our articles
(a) Any person whose wire, oral, or electronic communication is intercepted, disclosed, or used in violation of this Article, has a civil cause of action against any person who intercepts, discloses, uses, or procures any other person to intercept, disclose, or use such communications, and is entitled to recover from any other person: (1) Actual damages, but not less than liquidated damages, computed at the rate of one hundred dollars ($100.00) a day for each day of violation or one thousand dollars ($1,000), whichever is higher; (2) Punitive damages; and (3) A reasonable attorneys' fee and other litigation costs reasonably incurred. (b) Good faith reliance on a court order or on a representation made by the Attorney General or a district attorney is a complete defense to any civil or criminal action brought under this Article.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ncleg.gov
Cited in 4 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Kroh v. Kroh (Court of Appeals of North Carolina 2002, 152 N.C. App. 347)“…nce Act and awarded $1,000.00 in compensatory damages under G.S. § 15A-296. Following a bench trial on the remaini…”
- Riddick v. Gates Cnty. (Court of Appeals of North Carolina 2026)“…in the Board of Elections.” Plaintiff sues pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 15A-296, which creates a civil cause of action…”
- Wright v. TOWN OF ZEBULON (Court of Appeals of North Carolina 2010, 202 N.C. App. 540)“…damages, attorney’s fees, and associated litigation costs. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-296(a) (2009); Kroh v. Kroh,…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: North Carolina Phone Call Recording Laws: What You Need to Know, North Carolina Workplace Recording Laws: Employee and Employer Rights, North Carolina Ring Doorbell Laws: What You Need to Know in 2026
§ 15A-1340.17Punishment limits for each class of offense and prior record levelIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
(a) Offense Classification; Default Classifications. - The offense classification is as specified in the offense for which the sentence is being imposed. If the offense is a felony for which there is no classification, it is a Class I felony. (b) Fines. - Any judgment that includes a sentence of imprisonment may also include a fine. If a community punishment is authorized, the judgment may consist of a fine only. Additionally, when the defendant is other than an individual, the judgment may consist of a fine only. Unless otherwise provided, the amount of the fine is in the discretion of the court. (c) Punishments for Each Class of Offense and Prior Record Level; Punishment Chart Described. - The authorized punishment for each class of offense and prior record level is as specified in the chart below. Prior record levels are indicated by the Roman numerals placed horizontally on the top of the chart. Classes of offense are indicated by the letters placed vertically on the left side of the chart.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ncleg.gov
Cited in 330 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Allen (Supreme Court of North Carolina 2005, 359 N.C. 425)“…entence from the ranges presented in the chart found in N.C.G.S. § 15A-1340.17(c). Id. (emphasis added). This ho…”
- State v. Lucas (Supreme Court of North Carolina 2001, 353 N.C. 568)“…imits for each class of offense and prior record level, N.C.G.S. § 15A-1340.17(c), (e) (1999), the trial court sentenc…”
- State v. Green (Supreme Court of North Carolina 1998, 348 N.C. 588)“…e imprisonment. N.C.G.S. § 14-1.1 (1986) (superseded by N.C.G.S. § 15A-1340.17 (1997) (making life imprisonment mandat…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: North Carolina AI Meeting Recording Laws (2026)
§ 15A-286DefinitionsIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
As used in this Article, unless the context requires otherwise: (1) "Aggrieved person" means a person who was a party to any intercepted wire, oral, or electronic communication or a person against whom the interception was directed. (2) "Attorney General" means the Attorney General of the State of North Carolina, unless otherwise specified. (3) "Aural transfer" means a transfer containing the human voice at any point between and including the point of origin and the point of reception. (4) "Chapter 119 of the United States Code" means Chapter 119 of Part I of Title 18, United States Code, being Public Law 90-351, the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, as amended by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986. (5) "Communications common carrier" shall have the same meaning which is given the term "common carrier" by section 153(h) of Title 47 of the United States Code. (6) "Contents" when used with respect to any wire, oral, or electronic communication means and includes any information concerning the substance, purport, or meaning of that communication.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ncleg.gov
Cited in 9 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Wright v. TOWN OF ZEBULON (Court of Appeals of North Carolina 2010, 202 N.C. App. 540)“…ts violated the North Carolina Electronic Surveillance Act, N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 15A-286 to -298 (2009) (“NCESA”), by willfully…”
- Kroh v. Kroh (Court of Appeals of North Carolina 2002, 152 N.C. App. 347)“…llance Act, Art. 16 of Chapter 15A of the General Statutes (N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 15A-286 et seq. (2001)), and (4) i…”
- State v. McGriff (Court of Appeals of North Carolina 2002, 151 N.C. App. 631)“…he use of any electronic, mechanical, or other device.” N.C.G.S. § 15A-286(13) (2001). The key to our analy…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- N.C. Gen. Stat. 14-202 - Secretly Peeping into Room Occupied by Another Person(ncleg.gov).gov
- N.C. Gen. Stat. 15A-286 - Electronic Surveillance Definitions(ncleg.gov).gov
- N.C. Gen. Stat. 15A-287 - Interception and Disclosure Prohibited(ncleg.net).gov
- N.C. Gen. Stat. 15A-296 - Recovery of Civil Damages Authorized(ncleg.net).gov
- N.C. Gen. Stat. 15A-1340.17 - Punishment Limits for Each Class of Offense(ncleg.gov).gov
- Nichols v. Calhoun, No. COA24-905 (N.C. Ct. App. 2025)(wakeforestlawreview.com)
- UNC School of Government - Video Surveillance Cameras(nccriminallaw.sog.unc.edu)
- North Carolina Judicial Branch - Felony Punishment Chart(nccourts.gov).gov
- UNC School of Government - Invasion of Privacy Pattern Jury Instructions(sog.unc.edu)
- UNC School of Government - 2025 Legislation Affecting Criminal Law and Procedure (S.L. 2025-70, s. 8 amendments to G.S. 14-202)(lrs.sog.unc.edu)