Alaska
Alaska Medical Records Retention Laws (2026 Guide)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 18, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 9, 2026. · 9 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Alaska hospitals must retain patient medical records for seven years after discharge under AS 18.20.085. Physician practices are covered instead by 12 AAC 40.967(10), which requires patient records to be kept for at least seven years from the date of the last entry. Records for patients under age 19 must be kept until at least two years after the patient turns 19 or seven years after discharge, whichever is longer. HIPAA sets no separate retention period; Alaska state law governs.
Overview of Alaska Medical Records Retention Laws
Last verified: March 2026. This page reflects current Alaska Statutes Title 18, Chapter 20, Section 085 and related state and federal regulations.

Table of Contents
- Overview of Alaska Medical Records Retention Laws
- Hospital Records Retention Under AS 18.20.085
- Retention by Physicians and Non-Hospital Providers
- Retention Rules for Minors
- X-Ray and Imaging Records
- Federal Requirements That Apply in Alaska
- HIPAA and Alaska Medical Records
- Patient Access Rights Under AS 18.23.005
- Proper Destruction of Medical Records
- Practice Closure and Record Transfer
- Statute of Limitations Considerations
- Frequently Asked Questions
- Sources and References
Alaska law establishes specific rules for how long hospitals and healthcare facilities must keep patient medical records. The primary statute governing this area is Alaska Statute 18.20.085, which sets a baseline retention period of seven years following patient discharge.
These rules protect patients by making sure their health information remains available for ongoing care, legal proceedings, and insurance purposes. They also protect healthcare providers by giving them clear guidance on their recordkeeping obligations.
Understanding these retention laws matters whether you are a healthcare provider managing compliance, a patient trying to access your own records, or an administrator overseeing records storage and destruction.
Hospital Records Retention Under AS 18.20.085
Alaska Statute 18.20.085 is the cornerstone of medical records retention law in the state. The statute requires that, unless the Alaska Department of Health specifies otherwise, a hospital must retain and preserve records that relate directly to the care and treatment of a patient for a period of seven years following the discharge of the patient.
For hospitals, this seven-year period begins on the date of discharge, not the date of the last entry in the medical record. A different trigger applies to physician practices, which are governed by regulation rather than by this statute; see the next section. The requirement applies to all records that relate directly to patient care and treatment, including:
- Admission and discharge summaries
- Physician orders and progress notes
- Nursing notes and assessments
- Laboratory and diagnostic test results
- Medication administration records
- Surgical and procedural reports
- Consultation reports
- Consent forms
The statute grants the Alaska Department of Health the authority to modify these requirements. If the department issues specific regulations that differ from the seven-year baseline, those regulations take precedence.
AS 18.20.085(e) limits the section to facilities defined as hospitals under AS 18.20.130 and AS 18.20.210, so by its own terms it does not reach a physician's private office or clinic.
Electronic Preservation Under AS 18.23.100
AS 18.20.085(d) makes the entire hospital retention section subject to AS 18.23.100. That section allows a health care provider to maintain and preserve its medical records in an electronic format that protects the physical security of the records and protects them from access by unauthorized persons, and it states that a provider who does so is not required to maintain a separate paper copy.
In other words, the retention obligation is about preserving the record, not the paper. The Department of Health may adopt regulations under the Administrative Procedure Act (AS 44.62) to govern how this section is implemented.
Retention by Physicians and Non-Hospital Providers
AS 18.20.085 is a hospital statute, so the seven-years-after-discharge rule does not answer how long a physician's office must keep its charts. Physicians and other licensees under AS 08.64 are covered instead by the Alaska State Medical Board's unprofessional conduct regulation.
12 AAC 40.967(10) makes it unprofessional conduct to falsify, intentionally make an incorrect entry in, destroy, or fail to maintain patient or facility medical records for at least seven years from the date of the last entry.
Two differences matter in practice:
- The trigger is different. A hospital counts seven years from the patient's discharge. A physician practice counts seven years from the date of the last entry in the record, so a chart that is still being updated has not started its retention clock.
- The enforcement route is different. The physician rule is enforced as a disciplinary matter against the individual license, alongside the 30-day records-copy duty in 12 AAC 40.967(11) and the duty in 12 AAC 40.967(9) to prepare and maintain accurate, complete, and legible records.
A practice that is unsure which rule reaches a given record should retain to the later of the two dates.
Retention Rules for Minors
Alaska law provides extended protection for the medical records of younger patients. Under AS 18.20.085, the records of a patient under 19 years of age must be kept until at least two years after the patient reaches age 19, or until seven years following discharge, whichever period is longer.
This provision ensures that minors have access to their complete medical history after they reach adulthood.
Here is how the calculation works in practice:
- A child discharged at age 5 would have records retained until age 21 (two years past age 19), because that is longer than the standard seven-year window (which would end at age 12).
- A teenager discharged at age 17 would have records retained until age 24 (seven years post-discharge), because that is longer than the two-years-past-19 window (which would end at age 21).
- A patient discharged at age 13 would have records retained until age 21 (two years past age 19), since that deadline falls later than seven years after discharge (age 20).
The key principle is always to apply whichever calculation produces the longer retention period. Healthcare facilities should build these calculations into their records management systems to avoid premature destruction of pediatric records.
X-Ray and Imaging Records
Alaska law treats diagnostic imaging records differently from other medical records. Under AS 18.20.085, records consisting of X-ray film must be retained for a minimum of five years.
This shorter retention period reflects the physical storage challenges that X-ray films present, particularly their size and the specialized conditions required for proper preservation.
It is important to note that while original X-ray films may be disposed of after five years, any written reports or interpretations of those images that are part of the patient medical record are still subject to the standard seven-year retention requirement.
Modern digital imaging systems, including those using the DICOM standard, have reduced the storage burden significantly. Many Alaska hospitals now retain digital images for the full seven-year period alongside other medical records, even though the statute only requires five years for X-ray film specifically. AS 18.23.100 expressly permits secure electronic preservation without a separate paper or film copy.
Federal Requirements That Apply in Alaska
Alaska healthcare providers must comply with federal records retention requirements in addition to state law. Several federal rules create overlapping obligations.
CMS Conditions of Participation
Hospitals that participate in Medicare must follow the Conditions of Participation outlined in 42 CFR 482.24. This regulation requires hospitals to maintain medical records in their original or legally reproduced form for a period of at least five years.
Since Alaska state law requires seven years of retention, the state requirement is more restrictive and takes precedence in practice. Alaska hospitals already exceed the federal minimum by complying with state law.
Medicare Documentation Requirements
For providers who bill Medicare, CMS requires that medical records supporting claims be retained for seven years from the date of service. This aligns with Alaska state law, but providers should note that the Medicare requirement is measured from the date of service rather than the date of discharge.
For patients with extended hospital stays, the Medicare and state retention periods could end at different times. Providers should always retain records for whichever period ends later.
False Claims Act Considerations
The federal False Claims Act has a statute of limitations of up to 10 years for certain fraud claims. Healthcare organizations that participate in federal programs should consider retaining billing-related documentation beyond the minimum state requirement to protect against potential audits or investigations.
HIPAA and Alaska Medical Records
A common misconception is that HIPAA establishes a minimum retention period for medical records. It does not. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has confirmed that the HIPAA Privacy Rule does not include medical record retention requirements. State laws govern how long medical records must be retained.
However, HIPAA does impose two important requirements that affect Alaska healthcare providers:
HIPAA Administrative Documentation
Under 45 CFR 164.530, covered entities must retain HIPAA compliance documentation for six years from the date of creation or the date it was last in effect, whichever is later. This includes privacy policies, notices of privacy practices, complaint records, and related documentation. This is separate from the medical records themselves.
HIPAA Security During Retention
HIPAA requires covered entities to implement administrative, technical, and physical safeguards to protect the privacy of protected health information (PHI) for as long as the information is maintained. This means Alaska providers must keep medical records secure throughout the entire seven-year retention period and beyond, until the records are properly destroyed.
Patient Access Rights Under AS 18.23.005
Alaska patients have strong rights to access their own medical records. Under Alaska Statute 18.23.005, a patient is entitled to inspect and copy any records developed or maintained by a health care provider concerning the patient's own health care, notwithstanding the confidentiality protections that Chapter 18.23 otherwise gives to peer-review and quality-assurance records. The federal HIPAA Privacy Rule (45 CFR 164.524) separately requires the provider to act on a written access request within 30 days of receipt, extendable once by up to 30 more days with written notice, and to provide the records or a copy.
30-Day Response Requirement
Alaska takes the right to access medical records seriously. Under 12 AAC 40.967, the Alaska State Medical Board defines it as unprofessional conduct for a physician to fail to provide copies of complete patient records within 30 days of receiving a written request from the patient or their guardian.
This means physicians who delay or refuse records requests can face disciplinary action from the Medical Board, including potential sanctions against their medical license.
Limited Exceptions
There is a narrow exception to the patient access rule. Under the federal HIPAA Privacy Rule (45 CFR 164.524(a)(3)), if a licensed health care professional determines, in the exercise of professional judgment, that access is reasonably likely to endanger the life or physical safety of the patient or another person, the provider may deny access to that specific information. The patient then has the right under 45 CFR 164.524(a)(4) to have the denial reviewed by another licensed health care professional designated by the covered entity, who did not participate in the original decision.
Right to Request Amendments
Under the federal HIPAA Privacy Rule (45 CFR 164.526), a patient may request that a covered entity amend health information about them in a designated record set. The provider must act on the request within 60 days, extendable once by up to 30 more days with written notice, and either make the amendment or provide the patient with a written denial explaining why the amendment was refused.
Proper Destruction of Medical Records
Once the retention period has expired, healthcare providers may destroy medical records. However, both state and federal rules govern how that destruction must happen.
HIPAA Destruction Requirements
The HHS Office for Civil Rights requires that covered entities implement reasonable safeguards when disposing of protected health information. Acceptable methods include:
For paper records:
- Cross-cut shredding
- Burning
- Pulping or pulverizing
- Any method that renders the information unreadable and impossible to reconstruct
For electronic records:
- Clearing (overwriting with non-sensitive data using certified software)
- Purging (degaussing or exposing media to a strong magnetic field)
- Physical destruction (disintegration, pulverization, melting, incinerating, or shredding of the media)
Documentation of Destruction
Providers should maintain a destruction log that records what was destroyed, the date of destruction, the method used, and the name of the person who performed or supervised the destruction. While Alaska does not have a specific statute requiring a destruction log, maintaining one is a widely recommended best practice that protects providers in the event of an audit or legal dispute.
Third-Party Destruction Services
If a healthcare organization uses a third-party vendor for records destruction, HIPAA requires a Business Associate Agreement (BAA) with that vendor. The vendor must comply with all applicable HIPAA safeguards, and the provider should obtain a certificate of destruction as documentation.
Practice Closure and Record Transfer
When a physician retires, dies, or closes a practice in Alaska, specific rules govern what happens to patient records.
Medical Board Notification
The Alaska State Medical Board requires that within 30 days of retiring or closing a practice, a licensee must notify the board of the location of patient medical records. This notification can be submitted by email to the board.
Patient Notification
When a physician retires or a practice closes, patients must be notified and encouraged to find a new provider. Patients should also be informed that, upon their authorization, records will be transferred to their new provider.
Best practices for patient notification include:
- Sending written notice to all active patients well in advance of the closure date
- Publishing a notice in local newspapers
- Posting a notice at the practice location
- Including in the notice: the closure date, how to request records, where records will be stored, how long records will remain accessible, and contact information for future requests
Continued Retention Obligations
Closing a practice does not eliminate the obligation to retain records for the full statutory period. If a physician retires and has patient records from the previous three years, those records must still be maintained for the remaining duration of the seven-year retention period. The physician may transfer custody to another provider, a medical records custodian service, or a secure storage facility.
Statute of Limitations Considerations
Healthcare providers should consider Alaska's medical malpractice statute of limitations when deciding how long to retain records beyond the minimum required period.
Under AS 09.10.070, the statute of limitations for medical malpractice claims in Alaska is two years from the date the claim accrues. A claim accrues when the patient discovers, or reasonably should have discovered, the injury.
Alaska also has a statute of repose under AS 09.10.055(a)(2), which generally bars an action for personal injury, death, or property damage brought more than 10 years after the last act alleged to have caused it, regardless of when the injury was discovered.
That outer limit is not absolute. AS 09.10.055(b) lists circumstances in which the section does not apply at all, including where the injury resulted from an intentional act or gross negligence, fraud or misrepresentation, breach of an express warranty or guarantee, a defective product, or breach of trust or fiduciary duty, and where the facts that would give notice of a potential cause of action are intentionally concealed. AS 09.10.055(c) separately tolls the 10-year limit for any period in which an undiscovered foreign body with no therapeutic or diagnostic purpose remains in the patient's body and the claim is based on its presence. Several of those exceptions are squarely in play in malpractice disputes.
For a patient who was a minor when the claim accrued, AS 09.10.140(a) provides that the time of the disability of minority is not part of the time limit, but that the period within which the action may be brought is not extended more than two years after the disability ceases. In practice, that means a claim for a childhood injury generally must be brought within two years after the patient turns 18, not later. A separate rule in AS 09.10.140(c) applies to a personal injury suffered before the patient's eighth birthday: the time before that eighth birthday does not count toward the two-year limit in AS 09.10.070(a).
Because medical records are often the primary evidence in malpractice litigation, many healthcare attorneys recommend retaining records for at least 10 years to align with the statute of repose, and longer where one of the AS 09.10.055(b) exceptions could apply. This provides protection even in cases where the discovery rule delays the start of the limitations period.
Frequently Asked Questions
How long must Alaska hospitals keep medical records?
Alaska hospitals must retain patient medical records for seven years following discharge under AS 18.20.085. Records of patients under age 19 must be kept until at least two years after the patient turns 19, or seven years after discharge, whichever is longer. X-ray films have a separate five-year retention requirement.
How long must a physician's office in Alaska keep patient records?
AS 18.20.085 applies only to hospitals, so a physician practice follows a different rule. Under 12 AAC 40.967(10), it is unprofessional conduct for a licensee under AS 08.64 to fail to maintain patient or facility medical records for at least seven years from the date of the last entry. The trigger is the last entry in the record, not a discharge date.
Does HIPAA require a minimum retention period for medical records in Alaska?
No. The HIPAA Privacy Rule does not include any medical record retention requirements. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has confirmed that state laws, not HIPAA, govern how long medical records must be retained. HIPAA does require that records be kept secure for as long as they are maintained and that they be properly destroyed when disposed of.
How can I get a copy of my medical records in Alaska?
Under AS 18.23.005, you have the right to inspect and copy your medical records. The federal HIPAA Privacy Rule (45 CFR 164.524(b)) requires the provider to act on a written access request within 30 days of receipt, extendable once by up to 30 more days with written notice. Under Alaska regulation 12 AAC 40.967, a physician who fails to provide copies within 30 days of a written request can be charged with unprofessional conduct by the State Medical Board.
Can Alaska providers keep medical records only in electronic form?
Yes. Under AS 18.23.100, a health care provider may maintain and preserve medical records in an electronic format that protects their physical security and protects them from access by unauthorized persons, and a provider who does so is not required to keep a separate paper copy. AS 18.20.085(d) makes the hospital retention rule subject to that section.
What happens to my medical records if my doctor retires or closes their practice in Alaska?
The Alaska State Medical Board requires physicians to notify the board of the location of patient records within 30 days of retiring or closing a practice. Patients must be notified and informed about how to request their records. The physician remains responsible for ensuring records are retained for the full statutory period, even after the practice closes.
How should medical records be destroyed in Alaska after the retention period expires?
HIPAA requires that protected health information be destroyed so it cannot be reconstructed. Paper records should be cross-cut shredded, burned, pulped, or pulverized. Electronic records should be cleared using certified software, purged through degaussing, or physically destroyed. Providers should maintain a destruction log and obtain certificates of destruction from any third-party vendors.
Updates
Corrected the minor tolling rule and the 10-year statute of repose under Alaska law, added the separate seven-year retention duty that applies to physician practices under 12 AAC 40.967(10), and added the electronic-records provision in AS 18.23.100.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
Fixed the FAQ answer's mis-citation of the 30-day response standard to AS 18.23.005 (which has no response-time language); reattributed it to the federal HIPAA 45 CFR 164.524(b) 30-day timeline, matching the body-section fix.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Alaska Statutes, Title 18. Health, Safety, Housing, Human Rights, and Public Defender, Chapter 20. Hospitals and Nursing Facilities
§ 18.20.085Hospital records retentionIn force
(a) Unless specified otherwise by the department a hospital shall retain and preserve records that relate directly to the care and treatment of a patient for a period of seven years following the discharge of the patient. However, the records of a patient under 19 years of age shall be kept until at least two years after the patient has reached the age of 19 years or until seven years following the discharge of the patient, whichever is longer. Records consisting of X-ray film are required to be retained for five years. (b) The department shall by regulation define the types of records and the information required to be included in the records retained and preserved under (a) of this section. The department may by regulation specify records and information to be retained for longer periods than those set out in (a) of this section. (c) If a hospital ceases operation, it shall make immediate arrangements, as approved by the department, for the preservation of its records. (d) This section is subject to AS 18.23.100. (e) In this section, hospital includes those facilities defined as hospitals under AS 18.20.130 and 18.20.210.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-07 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at akleg.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 1994
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Sweet v. Sisters of Providence in Washington (Alaska Supreme Court 1994, 881 P.2d 304)“…the accrediting commission for Providence. See AS 18.20.085 (requiring records retention); 7 Alaska…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Code of Federal Regulations Title 42
§ 482.24Condition of participation: Medical record services.In forcecited in 52 of our articles
The hospital must have a medical record service that has administrative responsibility for medical records. A medical record must be maintained for every individual evaluated or treated in the hospital. (a) Standard: Organization and staffing. The organization of the medical record service must be appropriate to the scope and complexity of the services performed. The hospital must employ adequate personnel to ensure prompt completion, filing, and retrieval of records. (b) Standard: Form and retention of record. The hospital must maintain a medical record for each inpatient and outpatient. Medical records must be accurately written, promptly completed, properly filed and retained, and accessible. The hospital must use a system of author identification and record maintenance that ensures the integrity of the authentification and protects the security of all record entries. (1) Medical records must be retained in their original or legally reproduced form for a period of at least 5 years. (2) The hospital must have a system of coding and indexing medical records. The system must allow for timely retrieval by diagnosis and procedure, in order to support medical care evaluation studies.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ecfr.gov
Cited in 18 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):United States ex rel. Janssen v. Lawrence Memorial Hospital (2020) held the accurate medical record duty in 42 C.F.R. 482.24 is a generic regulatory requirement that does not establish False Claims Act materiality. United States Ex Rel. El-Amin v. George Washington University (2008) applied 482.24(c) to record completion evidence.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- United States ex rel. Janssen v. Lawrence Memorial Hospital (Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit 2020, 949 F.3d 533)✓A relator alleged the hospital falsified patient arrival times to raise its Medicare quality-program payments. The court held the general duty to keep accurate medical records under 42 C.F.R. 482.24 does not address those programs and cannot show False Claims Act materiality.
- United States Ex Rel. El-Amin v. George Washington University (District Court, District of Columbia 2008, 533 F. Supp. 2d 12)✓Nurse anesthetists claimed the hospital billed Medicare as though anesthesiologists performed whole procedures. Citing the 30-day rule in 42 C.F.R. 482.24(c)(2), the court excluded late-signing evidence, and excluded mass-signing evidence too though (c)(1) made it probative.
- NATIONAL ASS'N OF PSYCHIATRIC HEALTH SYSTEM v. Shalala (District Court, District of Columbia 2000, 120 F. Supp. 2d 33)“…to preexisting recordkeeping requirements, as specified in 42 C.F.R. § 482.24 . 7 . Proposed Rul…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: How Long Do Hospitals Keep Medical Records? (2026), How to Find Old Medical Records Online, Medical Records Retention Laws by State (2026 Guide)
Alaska Statutes, Title 18. Health, Safety, Housing, Human Rights, and Public Defender, Chapter 23. Health Care Services Information and Review Organizations
§ 18.23.005Patient access to recordsIn force
Notwithstanding the provisions of AS 18.23.005 18.23.070 or any other law, a patient is entitled to inspect and copy any records developed or maintained by a health care provider or other person pertaining to the health care rendered to the patient.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at akleg.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Jason A. Dixon v. State of Alaska (Court of Appeals of Alaska 2024, 553 P.3d 1273)“…if the lawyer opts to make copies for their own purposes); AS 18.23.005 (providing that a patient has the right…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Code of Federal Regulations Title 45
§ 164.524Access of individuals to protected health information.In forcecited in 23 of our articles
(a) Standard: Access to protected health information —(1) Right of access. Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (a)(2) or (a)(3) of this section, an individual has a right of access to inspect and obtain a copy of protected health information about the individual in a designated record set, for as long as the protected health information is maintained in the designated record set, except for: (i) Psychotherapy notes; and (ii) Information compiled in reasonable anticipation of, or for use in, a civil, criminal, or administrative action or proceeding. (2) Unreviewable grounds for denial. A covered entity may deny an individual access without providing the individual an opportunity for review, in the following circumstances. (i) The protected health information is excepted from the right of access by paragraph (a)(1) of this section.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ecfr.gov
Cited in 88 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Webb v. Smart Document Solutions, LLC (2007) held the reduced, cost-based fee in section 164.524(c)(4) applies only when the individual himself requests his records, not a law firm acting as his agent. Ciox Health, LLC v. Hargan (2020) vacated 2016 guidance that extended that patient rate to third-party directives.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Webb v. Smart Document Solutions, LLC (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2007, 499 F.3d 1078)✓A law firm ordered its client's hospital records and was billed a copying company's higher third-party rate; the Ninth Circuit held Section 164.524(c)(4)'s cost-based fee limit applies only when the individual or a personal representative asks, not an attorney acting as agent.
- Evenson v. Hartford Life & Annuity Insurance (District Court, M.D. Florida 2007, 244 F.R.D. 666)✓A therapist refused a subpoena for her psychotherapy notes, citing Section 164.524(a)(1)'s exclusion of those notes from a patient's right of access; the court held that exclusion governs only individual access, not discovery, and ordered the notes produced.
- Ciox Health, LLC v. Hargan (District Court, District of Columbia 2020)“…fee that can be charged for such production. See generally 45 C.F.R. § 164.524. For requests brought by an individual…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Medical Records Retention Laws by State (2026 Guide), Arkansas Medical Records Retention Laws (2026 Guide), Kentucky Medical Records Retention Laws (2026 Guide)
§ 164.526Amendment of protected health information.In forcecited in 3 of our articles
(a) Standard: Right to amend. (1) Right to amend. An individual has the right to have a covered entity amend protected health information or a record about the individual in a designated record set for as long as the protected health information is maintained in the designated record set. (2) Denial of amendment. A covered entity may deny an individual's request for amendment, if it determines that the protected health information or record that is the subject of the request: (i) Was not created by the covered entity, unless the individual provides a reasonable basis to believe that the originator of protected health information is no longer available to act on the requested amendment; (ii) Is not part of the designated record set; (iii) Would not be available for inspection under § 164.524; or (iv) Is accurate and complete. (b) Implementation specifications: Requests for amendment and timely action —(1) Individual's request for amendment. The covered entity must permit an individual to request that the covered entity amend the protected health information maintained in the designated record set.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-02 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ecfr.gov
Cited in 15 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Bondick v. Mitchell Sanchez (2024) held that claims under 45 CFR 164.526 fail as a matter of law because HIPAA creates no private right of action. Mallgren v. Burkholder (2014) reached the same result and pointed the plaintiff to the amendment procedure in subsections (b) through (d) as his remedy.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Mallgren v. Burkholder (District Court, E.D. New York 2014, 52 F. Supp. 3d 490)✓A committed psychiatric patient sued because his request to review and correct his records went unfulfilled; the court dismissed, holding the amendment process in 45 CFR 164.526 is enforced by HHS and gives no private right of action, and pointed him to that process instead.
- Crowding v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (United States Court of Federal Claims 2019)✓Vaccine-program counsel filed supplemental records altered in his client's favor and signed by a doctor no longer in practice; reading 45 CFR 164.526 to require a covered entity to preserve the original and append any amendment, the special master cut off fees after that filing.
- Bondick v. Mitchell Sanchez (District Court, D. Oregon 2024)✓A patient sued his former physician for libel over a note in his chart and also claimed a right to amend the record under 45 CFR 164.526(a)(1); the court granted summary judgment, holding HIPAA gives no private right of action, so that claim failed as a matter of law.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: What Is a Business Associate Agreement (BAA)? HIPAA Guide (2026), Medical Identity Theft: EOB Review, HIPAA Rights, and Fixing Your Records
§ 164.530Administrative requirements.In forcecited in 40 of our articles
(a)(1) Standard: Personnel designations. (i) A covered entity must designate a privacy official who is responsible for the development and implementation of the policies and procedures of the entity. (ii) A covered entity must designate a contact person or office who is responsible for receiving complaints under this section and who is able to provide further information about matters covered by the notice required by § 164.520. (2) Implementation specification: Personnel designations. A covered entity must document the personnel designations in paragraph (a)(1) of this section as required by paragraph (j) of this section. (b)(1) Standard: Training. A covered entity must train all members of its workforce on the policies and procedures with respect to protected health information required by this subpart and subpart D of this part, as necessary and appropriate for the members of the workforce to carry out their functions within the covered entity. (2) Implementation specifications: Training.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ecfr.gov
Cited in 23 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Surprise v. Innovation Group, Inc. (2013) applied 45 CFR 164.530(c), noting it requires appropriate safeguards but does not specify what they must be, and rejected a wrongful discharge claim resting on it. Baum v. KEYSTONE MERCY HEALTH PLAN (2011) treated the same duty as background to state tort claims and remanded.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Baum v. KEYSTONE MERCY HEALTH PLAN (District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania 2011, 826 F. Supp. 2d 718)✓A lost flash drive exposed health data on 280,000 insured children, and a parent sued in state court for negligence per se. The court held that resting the claim on the HIPAA safeguard rule at 45 C.F.R. 164.530(c)(2)(i) raised no substantial federal question, and remanded.
- Surprise v. Innovation Group, Inc. (District Court, D. Massachusetts 2013, 925 F. Supp. 2d 134)✓An employee fired after complaining that health-information documents went into unsecured trash sued for wrongful discharge. The court read 45 C.F.R. 164.530(c) to require safeguards without prescribing a method, and held HIPAA disposal rules are not well-defined public policy.
- Michael Terpin v. at and T Mobility LLC (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2024, 118 F.4th 1102)“…viders to protect patients’ “protected health information.” 45 C.F.R. § 164.530(c)(1); Moore, 299 Cal. Rptr. 3d at 561.…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: District of Columbia Medical Records Retention Laws (2026 Guide), Delaware Medical Records Retention Laws (2026 Guide), California Medical Records Retention Laws (2026 Guide)
Alaska Statutes, Title 9. Code of Civil Procedure, Chapter 10. Limitations of Actions
§ 09.10.070Actions for torts, for injury to personal property, for certain statutory liabilities, and against peace officers and coroners to be brought in two yearsIn forcecited in 10 of our articles
(a) Except as otherwise provided by law, a person may not bring an action (1) for libel, slander, assault, battery, seduction, or false imprisonment, (2) for personal injury or death, or injury to the rights of another not arising on contract and not specifically provided otherwise; (3) for taking, detaining, or injuring personal property, including an action for its specific recovery; (4) upon a statute for a forfeiture or penalty to the state; or (5) upon a liability created by statute, other than a penalty or forfeiture; unless the action is commenced within two years of the accrual of the cause of action. (b) A person may not bring an action against a peace officer or coroner upon a liability incurred by the doing of an act in an official capacity or by the omission of an official duty, including the nonpayment of money collected upon an execution, unless brought within two years. This subsection does not apply to an action for an escape.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at akleg.gov
Cited in 228 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Alaska courts apply the two-year limit of AS 09.10.070(a) to personal injury and other tort claims. Cikan v. ARCO Alaska, Inc. (2005) held mental incompetency under AS 09.10.140(a) can toll it, with the competency dispute resolved at a pretrial hearing. Robinson v. Alaska Hous. Fin. Corp. (2019) applied it to dismiss untimely tort claims.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Adkins v. Nabors Alaska Drilling, Inc. (Alaska Supreme Court 1980, 609 P.2d 15)✓A worker who suffered a head injury tripping over a hose at a drilling site added a new defendant eight months after AS 09.10.070's two-year period ran. The court held his evidence of concussion and amnesia raised a fact issue on tolling, so summary judgment was improper.
- Evans Ex Rel. Kutch v. State (Alaska Supreme Court 2002, 56 P.3d 1046)✓Injured plaintiffs facially challenged Alaska's 1997 tort reform, including how AS 09.10.070's two-year limit works with the minors tolling rule. The court held the narrower tolling given to children hurt before their eighth birthday is rationally based and upheld the scheme.
- Cikan v. ARCO Alaska, Inc. (Alaska Supreme Court 2005, 125 P.3d 335)✓A woman who slipped on ice outside an office building and hit her head sued nearly nine years later. The court held AS 09.10.070(a)'s two-year limit would ordinarily bar the claim, but her evidence of post-concussion incompetency required a pretrial evidentiary hearing.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Alaska Dog Bite Laws: Liability and Victim Rights, Alaska Hit and Run Laws: Penalties and What to Do, Alaska Car Accident Laws: Fault, Insurance, and Your Claim
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Alaska Statute 18.20.085 - Hospital Records Retention(akleg.gov).gov
- Alaska Statute 18.23.005 - Patient Access to Records(akleg.gov).gov
- 12 AAC 40.967 - Unprofessional Conduct(law.cornell.edu)
- 42 CFR 482.24 - CMS Conditions of Participation(ecfr.gov).gov
- 45 CFR 164.530 - HIPAA Administrative Requirements(ecfr.gov).gov
- HHS FAQ - HIPAA Record Retention(hhs.gov).gov
- HHS FAQ - HIPAA Disposal Requirements(hhs.gov).gov
- CMS Medical Record Maintenance Requirements(cms.gov).gov
- Alaska Medical Board - Practice Closure Guidelines(commerce.alaska.gov).gov
- Alaska Statute 09.10.070 - Statute of Limitations(akleg.gov).gov
- 12 AAC 40.967 - Unprofessional Conduct (Alaska State Medical Board), including (10) seven-year retention from date of last entry(akleg.gov)
- Alaska Statute 18.23.100 - Use of Electronic Medical Records(akleg.gov)
- Alaska Statute 09.10.055 - Statute of Repose of 10 Years (including subsection (b) exceptions)(akleg.gov)
- Alaska Statute 09.10.140 - Disabilities of Minority and Incompetency(akleg.gov)