Kentucky
Kentucky Medical Records Retention Laws (2026 Guide)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited September 7, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 18, 2026. · 15 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Kentucky requires licensed hospitals to retain medical records for at least six years from the date of discharge under 902 KAR 20:016. If the patient was a minor, the hospital must keep the record for six years from discharge or three years after the patient reaches the age of majority, whichever is longest. We did not locate an equivalent Kentucky retention period for private physician offices.
Kentucky imposes specific medical records retention requirements on hospitals and certain healthcare facilities through state administrative regulations. The primary regulation is 902 KAR 20:016, which addresses hospital operations and services, including how long patient records must be preserved after discharge.
Understanding these rules matters for healthcare providers, patients seeking access to their records, and administrators responsible for records management and compliance. This guide covers state and federal retention requirements, patient access rights, proper destruction methods, and what happens to records when a practice closes.
Hospital Medical Records Retention Under 902 KAR 20:016
Kentucky's primary retention requirement for hospital medical records appears in 902 KAR 20:016, titled "Hospitals; operations and services." The Cabinet for Health and Family Services promulgated the regulation through its Office of Inspector General under the authority of KRS 216B.042(1). That office, not the Department for Public Health, is the regulatory and licensing agency for Kentucky health care facilities.

Under Section 3(11)(b)2 of the regulation, hospitals licensed in Kentucky must retain medical records for at least six years from the date of discharge. The regulation states this as a minimum, so a hospital may keep records longer under its own policy or under a litigation hold.
"Medical records shall be retained for at least: a. Six (6) years from date of discharge; or b. If a minor, three (3) years after the patient reaches the age of majority under state law, whichever is the longest." Source: 902 KAR 20:016, Section 3(11)(b)2
The obligation reaches every patient the hospital treats. Section 3(11)(b) requires a medical record maintained in accordance with accepted professional principles "for every patient admitted to the hospital or receiving outpatient services," so outpatient encounters carry the same retention period as inpatient stays.
What Hospital Records Must Include
Section 3(11) also requires a system of identification and filing that assures prompt location of a patient's medical record, and Section 3(11)(f) sets out the required contents in detail. The record generally includes:
- Patient identification and demographic data
- Admission information
- Medical history and physical examination findings
- Diagnoses
- Diagnostic and therapeutic orders
- Clinical observations, progress notes, and nursing notes
- Reports of procedures, tests, and their results
- Discharge summaries
That list summarizes the categories rather than reproducing the regulation in full. Consult Section 3(11)(f) directly before building a records checklist against it.
Retention Requirements for Minor Patients
Kentucky applies a different calculation when the patient was a minor at the time of treatment. Under Section 3(11)(b)2, the hospital compares two periods and keeps the record for whichever runs longest: six years from the date of discharge, or three years after the patient reaches the age of majority under state law.
The age of majority in Kentucky is 18 for most purposes under KRS 2.015, so the second prong ordinarily runs to the patient's 21st birthday. KRS 2.015 sets one exception that matters here: for purposes of care and treatment of children with disabilities, the age of majority is 21, so for those patients the second prong can run to the 24th birthday. Because 902 KAR 20:016 defers to the age of majority "under state law" without defining minor, confirm which age applies before scheduling destruction of a disabled pediatric patient's record.
Because the rule is a comparison, which prong controls depends on how old the child was at discharge:
- A child discharged at age 10. Six years from discharge ends at age 16, but the age-of-majority prong runs to 21. The hospital keeps the record for 11 years.
- A patient discharged at age 17. The age-of-majority prong ends at 21, but six years from discharge runs to age 23. The six-year prong controls.
Watch out: For teenagers, the six-year prong routinely outlasts the age-21 prong. Treating "keep it until 21" as the entire rule can destroy a record a year or more early, which is a compliance failure and can leave a patient without records they later need.
This extended retention matters particularly for:
- Young adults who need childhood medical history for ongoing care
- Legal proceedings that arise after the patient reaches adulthood
- Insurance claims that reference childhood medical events
- Disability determinations requiring early medical documentation
Physician Office and Private Practice Retention
902 KAR 20:016 applies to licensed hospitals. We did not locate a Kentucky statute or administrative regulation setting an equivalent minimum retention period for records held by a private physician office or an outpatient clinic outside the hospital setting.
Treat that as an absence we could not fill rather than a guarantee that nothing applies. Before setting a destruction schedule, confirm current requirements with the Kentucky Board of Medical Licensure, because a professional licensing standard can govern where no retention statute does.
Several other requirements set the practical floor in any event.
Federal Requirements That Apply
A practice that bills Medicare or Medicaid is subject to federal recordkeeping rules. Under 42 CFR 424.516(f)(1)(i)(A), a provider or supplier that furnishes covered ordered, certified, referred, or prescribed Part A or Part B services, items, or drugs must maintain documentation for seven years from the date of service. Paragraph (f)(2)(i)(A) applies the same seven-year period to physicians and eligible professionals. CMS restates that period in its Medical Record Maintenance and Access Requirements guidance.
Kentucky Medicaid sets its participation conditions in 907 KAR 1:671, which requires a provider to make administrative and medical records available for audit or investigation but does not itself state a retention period. The duration sits in service-specific regulations instead. The vision program rule at 907 KAR 1:632, Section 7(1)(a), is a representative example: it requires a provider to keep records of a service for the period currently required by the U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary, in accordance with 42 CFR 431.17, unless the department requires a longer period under 907 KAR 1:671.
Check the regulation that governs your own service type. 907 KAR 1:632 is Kentucky's vision benefit rule, not a general Medicaid retention regulation, and it is cited here only to show how the retention duty is structured.
Professional Best Practices
Because we located no Kentucky retention schedule for private practices, the working benchmark is the longest period any applicable rule imposes. For a practice that bills Medicare, that is the seven-year period at 42 CFR 424.516(f) for documentation of ordered, certified, referred, or prescribed services.
Malpractice exposure is the other consideration. A destroyed record cannot support a defense, so practices commonly align retention with the statute of limitations for claims they could face, and hold pediatric records longer because a minor's limitations period is generally tolled. Confirm the current limitations periods that apply to your practice before you fix a schedule, and do not treat a rule of thumb as the deadline.
HIPAA Requirements and Medical Records
A common misconception is that the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) sets a retention period for medical records. It does not.

According to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the HIPAA Privacy Rule contains no medical record retention requirement. State law governs how long clinical records must be kept, which is why 902 KAR 20:016 does the work in Kentucky.
HIPAA does impose a six-year retention requirement on compliance documentation. Under 45 CFR 164.530(j)(2), a covered entity must retain the documentation required by paragraph (j)(1), including written policies and procedures, required written communications, and records of required actions or designations, for six years from the date of its creation or the date when it last was in effect, whichever is later.
So HIPAA does not dictate how long you keep a patient's chart. It requires you to keep the policies and documentation that govern how you handle that chart.
What HIPAA Does Require for Records
While HIPAA sets no retention period for the clinical record itself, it does require covered entities to:
- Apply administrative, technical, and physical safeguards to protect records they retain
- Ensure proper disposal of protected health information (PHI) when records are destroyed
- Provide patients access to their records for as long as those records are maintained
- Maintain documentation of certain disclosures of PHI for six years
CMS and Medicare Conditions of Participation
Hospitals participating in Medicare must comply with the Conditions of Participation at 42 CFR 482.24. These federal requirements sit alongside Kentucky's regulation, and a Kentucky hospital must satisfy both.
Paragraph (b)(1) provides that medical records "must be retained in their original or legally reproduced form for a period of at least 5 years."
Kentucky's six-year rule exceeds that federal floor rather than matching it. The practical consequence runs one way only. A hospital that complies with 902 KAR 20:016 also satisfies the CMS condition, but a hospital that retained records for the federal five years alone would fall a full year short of Kentucky law.
For other Medicare providers and suppliers, including physician offices, the seven-year period at 42 CFR 424.516(f) applies instead of the hospital condition. It covers documentation of covered ordered, certified, referred, or prescribed services, items, or drugs rather than the whole chart.
Patient Access to Medical Records in Kentucky
Kentucky gives patients a statutory right to obtain copies of their records. Under KRS 422.317(1), a hospital licensed under KRS Chapter 216B, or a health care provider, must supply a patient with a copy of the patient's medical record on the patient's written request.
The General Assembly created the statute in 1994 Ky. Acts ch. 512, Part 16, sec. 117, and amended it by 1996 Ky. Acts ch. 334, sec. 6, effective July 15, 1996.
KRS 422.317(2) excludes the Department of Corrections from the definition of a health care provider for this section, although the department may make an individual inmate's records available to that inmate unless it determines the record is subject to KRS 197.025.
Copying Fees
Kentucky's fee rule is more favorable to patients than many summaries suggest. The statute makes the first copy free.
"Upon a patient's written request, a hospital licensed under KRS Chapter 216B or a health care provider shall provide, without charge to the patient, a copy of the patient's medical record. A copying fee, not to exceed one dollar ($1) per page, may be charged by the health care provider for furnishing a second copy of the patient's medical record upon request either by the patient or the patient's attorney or the patient's authorized representative." Source: KRS 422.317(1)
The statute therefore sets two rules:
- First copy: no charge to the patient, on written request.
- Second copy: up to $1 per page, whether the request comes from the patient, the patient's attorney, or an authorized representative.
KRS 422.317 sets no flat search fee, no per-request minimum, and no separate mailing charge. If a Kentucky provider bills a patient for a first copy of their own record, that is worth raising against the statutory text in writing.
A patient denied access can file a HIPAA right-of-access complaint with the HHS Office for Civil Rights, which has enforced that right in multiple settlements. For a licensed Kentucky facility, the Cabinet for Health and Family Services' Office of Inspector General is the state licensing authority.
Access to Minor Patient Records
Kentucky enacted KRS 422.355 in 2024 Ky. Acts ch. 164, sec. 1, effective July 15, 2024. Under subsection (2), the parent of a patient under 18, or the patient's personal representative acting on the patient's behalf, has the right to access the patient's health information maintained by a health care provider in a medical record, unless access is prohibited under HIPAA or any other federal or state law. Subsection (1) defines a personal representative as an individual who has authority under state law to make health care decisions for a patient.
The statute does not list categories of care that are carved out. It states the exception by cross-reference, so whether a parent can reach a particular part of a minor's record turns on HIPAA and on any other federal or state law governing that care. Providers apply that analysis case by case, and a parent who is refused access should ask the provider in writing which law it relies on.
HIPAA Right of Access
Separately from state law, the HIPAA Privacy Rule at 45 CFR 164.524 gives patients the right to inspect and obtain copies of protected health information in a designated record set.
Under paragraph (b)(2)(i), a covered entity must act on an access request no later than 30 days after receiving it. Paragraph (b)(2)(ii) permits one extension of no more than 30 additional days, and only if the entity gives the individual written notice of the reason for the delay and the date it will complete the request.
Proper Destruction of Medical Records
Once the applicable retention period expires, Kentucky healthcare providers may destroy medical records. Destruction must still comply with HIPAA requirements protecting patient privacy.
The HHS Office for Civil Rights directs covered entities to use methods that render protected health information unreadable, indecipherable, and impossible to reconstruct.
Acceptable Destruction Methods for Paper Records
- Shredding using cross-cut shredders
- Burning in a controlled environment
- Pulping through a professional document destruction service
- Pulverizing to render content unrecoverable
Acceptable Destruction Methods for Electronic Records
- Clearing by overwriting storage media with non-sensitive data
- Purging through degaussing or cryptographic erasure
- Physical destruction by pulverizing, melting, incinerating, or shredding storage media
What Is Not Acceptable
Providers may not dispose of records containing PHI in:
- Public dumpsters or recycling bins
- Regular trash receptacles accessible to unauthorized persons
- Unsecured recycling containers
Kentucky providers should keep a destruction log recording the destruction date, the method used, the records destroyed by type rather than by patient name, and the individual or vendor that performed the destruction. Retain that log as HIPAA compliance documentation for the six years required by 45 CFR 164.530(j)(2).
What Happens When a Practice Closes
When a Kentucky physician's practice closes, the provider remains responsible for keeping medical records maintained and accessible for the full retention period. Kentucky has no statute detailing practice closure procedures, so the Kentucky Board of Medical Licensure is the authority to consult on professional expectations.
Recommended Steps for Practice Closure
-
Notify patients in advance. Written notice well before the closure date should state when the practice closes, how patients can obtain copies of their records, and the name of any physician taking over the practice.
-
Arrange records transfer or custodianship. Transfer records to another provider who agrees to accept them, or engage a medical records custodian to hold them for the remainder of the retention period.
-
Notify the Kentucky Board of Medical Licensure. Physicians closing a practice should inform the KBML and update their license status.
-
Notify insurance companies and payers. Inform all relevant carriers and billing entities of the closure.
-
Maintain access. Patients keep their right of access under KRS 422.317 and HIPAA after closure. The closing physician or designated custodian must continue to honor record requests, including the free first copy.
Hospital Closures
When a Kentucky hospital closes, the six-year obligation under 902 KAR 20:016 still runs for its full term; closing does not shorten it. Administrators should coordinate with the Cabinet for Health and Family Services' Office of Inspector General, which licenses Kentucky hospitals, on continued storage and patient access.
Kentucky Retention Rules at a Glance
| Provider Type | Retention Period | Authority |
|---|---|---|
| Hospitals (adult patients) | At least 6 years from discharge | 902 KAR 20:016 §3(11)(b)2 |
| Hospitals (minor patients) | 6 years from discharge, or 3 years after the age of majority (age 21; age 24 for care and treatment of children with disabilities), whichever is longest | 902 KAR 20:016 §3(11)(b)2 |
| Physician offices (state law) | No Kentucky retention period located | N/A |
| Medicare providers and suppliers | 7 years from date of service (documentation of ordered, certified, referred, or prescribed services) | 42 CFR 424.516(f) |
| Medicare hospitals (federal floor) | At least 5 years | 42 CFR 482.24(b)(1) |
| Kentucky Medicaid (vision program example) | Period required by the U.S. HHS Secretary | 907 KAR 1:632 §7(1)(a) |
| HIPAA compliance documentation | 6 years from creation or last effective date | 45 CFR 164.530(j)(2) |
| Patient's first record copy | Free on written request | KRS 422.317(1) |
Frequently Asked Questions
How long do Kentucky hospitals keep medical records?
Kentucky hospitals must retain medical records for at least six years from the date of discharge under 902 KAR 20:016, Section 3(11)(b)2. If the patient was a minor, the hospital keeps the record for six years from discharge or three years after the patient reaches the age of majority, whichever is longest. Some sources still state a five-year period for Kentucky; the regulation says six.
How long must a Kentucky hospital keep a child's medical records?
The hospital compares two periods and applies the longer one: six years from the date of discharge, or three years after the patient reaches the age of majority. Kentucky's age of majority is 18 for most purposes under KRS 2.015, so that second prong generally runs to age 21; for purposes of care and treatment of children with disabilities, KRS 2.015 sets the age of majority at 21, so the prong can run to age 24. For a child discharged at 10, the record is generally kept until 21. For a patient discharged at 17, six years from discharge runs to age 23, so that prong controls.
Does Kentucky require physician offices to keep medical records for a specific period?
We did not locate a Kentucky statute or regulation setting a retention period for private physician offices, so confirm current requirements with the Kentucky Board of Medical Licensure. Federal rules still apply: under 42 CFR 424.516(f), a provider or supplier must maintain documentation of covered ordered, certified, referred, or prescribed Part A or Part B services, items, or drugs for seven years from the date of service.
Can I get a copy of my medical records in Kentucky, and what does it cost?
Yes. Under KRS 422.317(1), a hospital licensed under KRS Chapter 216B or a health care provider must give a patient a copy of their medical record on written request, and the first copy is provided without charge to the patient. A second copy may carry a fee of up to $1 per page, whether requested by the patient, the patient's attorney, or an authorized representative. The statute sets no separate search or mailing charge.
Can a parent access a minor child's medical records in Kentucky?
Generally yes. Under KRS 422.355(2), effective July 15, 2024, a parent of a patient under 18 or the patient's personal representative has the right to access the patient's health information in a medical record, unless access is prohibited under HIPAA or any other federal or state law. The statute does not itself list carved-out categories of care, so a refusal should be explained by reference to the specific law the provider relies on.
Does HIPAA require healthcare providers to keep medical records for a certain number of years?
No. The HIPAA Privacy Rule sets no retention period for clinical records, and state law governs instead. HIPAA does require covered entities to retain compliance documentation, such as privacy policies, required written communications, and records of required actions, for six years from creation or the date last in effect, whichever is later, under 45 CFR 164.530(j)(2).
Does Kentucky's hospital retention rule satisfy Medicare requirements?
Yes for hospitals. The CMS Conditions of Participation at 42 CFR 482.24(b)(1) require at least five years, and Kentucky requires six, so meeting the state rule also meets the federal floor. The reverse does not hold: retaining records for only five years would fall short of Kentucky law.
What should a Kentucky physician do with medical records when closing a practice?
Notify patients in writing before the closure date, arrange for records to be transferred to another provider or a qualified medical records custodian, notify the Kentucky Board of Medical Licensure, and keep records accessible for the full retention period. The physician or custodian must continue to honor access requests under KRS 422.317 and HIPAA, including the free first copy.
Updates
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected the hospital retention period to six years from discharge under 902 KAR 20:016, Section 3(11)(b)2, and rewrote the minor-patient rule as the regulation actually states it, including the KRS 2.015 exception that sets the age of majority at 21 for care and treatment of children with disabilities, so those records can require retention to age 24. Also corrected the records copying fees: KRS 422.317 entitles a patient to a free first copy of their own record, with up to $1 per page only for a second copy. Clarified that the federal seven-year Medicare rule at 42 CFR 424.516(f) covers documentation of ordered, certified, referred, or prescribed services rather than every record a practice holds.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Code of Federal Regulations Title 42
§ 482.24Condition of participation: Medical record services.In forcecited in 52 of our articles
The hospital must have a medical record service that has administrative responsibility for medical records. A medical record must be maintained for every individual evaluated or treated in the hospital. (a) Standard: Organization and staffing. The organization of the medical record service must be appropriate to the scope and complexity of the services performed. The hospital must employ adequate personnel to ensure prompt completion, filing, and retrieval of records. (b) Standard: Form and retention of record. The hospital must maintain a medical record for each inpatient and outpatient. Medical records must be accurately written, promptly completed, properly filed and retained, and accessible. The hospital must use a system of author identification and record maintenance that ensures the integrity of the authentification and protects the security of all record entries. (1) Medical records must be retained in their original or legally reproduced form for a period of at least 5 years. (2) The hospital must have a system of coding and indexing medical records. The system must allow for timely retrieval by diagnosis and procedure, in order to support medical care evaluation studies.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ecfr.gov
Cited in 18 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):United States ex rel. Janssen v. Lawrence Memorial Hospital (2020) held the accurate medical record duty in 42 C.F.R. 482.24 is a generic regulatory requirement that does not establish False Claims Act materiality. United States Ex Rel. El-Amin v. George Washington University (2008) applied 482.24(c) to record completion evidence.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- United States ex rel. Janssen v. Lawrence Memorial Hospital (Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit 2020, 949 F.3d 533)✓A relator alleged the hospital falsified patient arrival times to raise its Medicare quality-program payments. The court held the general duty to keep accurate medical records under 42 C.F.R. 482.24 does not address those programs and cannot show False Claims Act materiality.
- United States Ex Rel. El-Amin v. George Washington University (District Court, District of Columbia 2008, 533 F. Supp. 2d 12)✓Nurse anesthetists claimed the hospital billed Medicare as though anesthesiologists performed whole procedures. Citing the 30-day rule in 42 C.F.R. 482.24(c)(2), the court excluded late-signing evidence, and excluded mass-signing evidence too though (c)(1) made it probative.
- NATIONAL ASS'N OF PSYCHIATRIC HEALTH SYSTEM v. Shalala (District Court, District of Columbia 2000, 120 F. Supp. 2d 33)“…to preexisting recordkeeping requirements, as specified in 42 C.F.R. § 482.24 . 7 . Proposed Rul…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: How Long Do Hospitals Keep Medical Records? (2026), How to Find Old Medical Records Online, Medical Records Retention Laws by State (2026 Guide)
§ 424.516Additional provider and supplier requirements for enrolling and maintaining active enrollment status in the Medicare program.In forcecited in 15 of our articles
(a) Certifying compliance. CMS enrolls and maintains an active enrollment status for a provider or supplier when that provider or supplier certifies that it meets, and continues to meet, and CMS verifies that it meets, and continues to meet, all of the following requirements: (1) Compliance with title XVIII of the Act and applicable Medicare regulations. (2) Compliance with Federal and State licensure, certification, and regulatory requirements, as required, based on the type of services or supplies the provider or supplier type will furnish and bill Medicare. (3) Not employing or contracting with individuals or entities that meet either of the following conditions: (i) Excluded from participation in any Federal health care programs, for the provision of items and services covered under the programs, in violation of section 1128A(a)(6) of the Act. (ii) Debarred by the General Services Administration (GSA) from any other Executive Branch procurement or nonprocurement programs or activities, in accordance with the Federal Acquisition and Streamlining Act of 1994, and with the HHS Common Rule at 45 CFR part 76.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ecfr.gov
Cited in 7 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- United States Ex Rel. Westmoreland v. Amgen, Inc. (District Court, D. Massachusetts 2011, 812 F. Supp. 2d 39)“…recon *52 dition of payment can be found in 42 C.F.R. § 424.516 (a)(1), which states that “CMS enrolls…”
- Johnson v. Kelly (District Court, W.D. Oklahoma 2024)“…care laws, regulations, and program instructions. Id. ¶ 22; 42 C.F.R. § 424.516(a). To that end, a healthcare provider…”
- LILIA GOROVITS, M.D., P.C. v. AZAR (District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania 2021)“…2 Pursuant to 42 C.F.R. § 424.516(d)(1)(ii), Medicare physicians are requ…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Medical Records Retention Laws by State (2026 Guide), Louisiana Medical Records Retention Laws (2026 Guide), Mississippi Medical Records Retention Laws (2026 Guide)
§ 431.17Maintenance of records.In force
(a) Basis and purpose. This section, based on section 1902(a)(4) of the Act, prescribes the kinds of records a Medicaid agency must maintain, the minimum retention period for such records, and the conditions under which those records must be provided or made available. (b) Content of records. A State plan must provide that the Medicaid agency will maintain or supervise the maintenance of the records necessary for the proper and efficient operation of the plan. The records must include all of the following: (1) Individual records on each applicant and beneficiary that contain all of the following: (i) All information provided on the initial application submitted through any modality described in § 435.907 of this chapter by, or on behalf of, the applicant or beneficiary, including the signature on and date of application. (ii) The electronic account and any information or other documentation received from another insurance affordability program in accordance with § 435.1200(c) and (d) of this chapter.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ecfr.gov
Cited in 4 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2010
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- John B. v. Goetz (District Court, M.D. Tennessee 2010, 879 F. Supp. 2d 787)“…Defendants must provide any records the Secretary requires. 42 C.F.R. 431.17(c). Federal regulations also require th…”
- Perales v. Sullivan (Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit 1991, 948 F.2d 1348)“…ram, as well as statistical, fiscal, and other data. See 42 C.F.R. § 431.17 (b). After “qualification” comes the…”
- Kim v. State (Court of Claims of Illinois 1991, 43 Ill. Ct. Cl. 286)“…rendered to IDPA recipients. 89 111. Admin. Code §140.28; 42 C.F.R. §§431.17 and 431.107(b); and see the MAP Handbo…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Kentucky Revised Statutes, Chapter 422: EVIDENCE AND LOST RECORDS
§ 422.317Copy of patient's medical record to be supplied on patient's written request -- Exception for Department of CorrectionsIn force
(1) Upon a patient's written request, a hospital licensed under KRS Chapter 216B or a health care provider shall provide, without charge to the patient, a copy of the patient's medical record. A copying fee, not to exceed one dollar ($1) per page, may be charged by the health care provider for furnishing a second copy of the patient's medical record upon request either by the patient or the patient's attorney or the patient's authorized representative. (2) The Department of Corrections shall not be considered as a health care provider under this section; however, the department may make medical records of an individual inmate available to that individual inmate unless the department, through its designee, determines that the provision of the record is subject to the provisions of KRS 197.025.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at apps.legislature.ky.gov
Cited in 6 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2022
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Eriksen v. Gruner & Simms, PLLC (Court of Appeals of Kentucky 2013, 400 S.W.3d 290)“…e a patient is requesting their one free copy allowed under KRS 422.317, providers must make a complete copy of…”
- Woodward, Hobson & Fulton, L.L.P. v. Revenue Cabinet (Court of Appeals of Kentucky 2002, 69 S.W.3d 476)“…simultaneously apply for such a protective order. KRS 422.317(1) provides that a patient’s medical re…”
- Hardin County v. Valentine (Court of Appeals of Kentucky 1995, 894 S.W.2d 151)“…e that since this appeal was filed, the legislature enacted KRS 422.317 in which it stated that “[a] copying fe…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 422.355Right to access medical record of a patient under age eighteen -- ExceptionsIn force
(1) As used in this section, "personal representative" means an individual who has authority under state law to make health care decisions for a patient. (2) The parent of a patient who is under the age of eighteen (18), or a patient's personal representative on behalf of the patient who is under the age of eighteen (18), shall have the right to access the patient's health information maintained by a health care provider in a medical record unless prohibited under the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 or any other federal or state law.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at apps.legislature.ky.gov
Code of Federal Regulations Title 45
§ 164.530Administrative requirements.In forcecited in 40 of our articles
(a)(1) Standard: Personnel designations. (i) A covered entity must designate a privacy official who is responsible for the development and implementation of the policies and procedures of the entity. (ii) A covered entity must designate a contact person or office who is responsible for receiving complaints under this section and who is able to provide further information about matters covered by the notice required by § 164.520. (2) Implementation specification: Personnel designations. A covered entity must document the personnel designations in paragraph (a)(1) of this section as required by paragraph (j) of this section. (b)(1) Standard: Training. A covered entity must train all members of its workforce on the policies and procedures with respect to protected health information required by this subpart and subpart D of this part, as necessary and appropriate for the members of the workforce to carry out their functions within the covered entity. (2) Implementation specifications: Training.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ecfr.gov
Cited in 23 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Surprise v. Innovation Group, Inc. (2013) applied 45 CFR 164.530(c), noting it requires appropriate safeguards but does not specify what they must be, and rejected a wrongful discharge claim resting on it. Baum v. KEYSTONE MERCY HEALTH PLAN (2011) treated the same duty as background to state tort claims and remanded.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Baum v. KEYSTONE MERCY HEALTH PLAN (District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania 2011, 826 F. Supp. 2d 718)✓A lost flash drive exposed health data on 280,000 insured children, and a parent sued in state court for negligence per se. The court held that resting the claim on the HIPAA safeguard rule at 45 C.F.R. 164.530(c)(2)(i) raised no substantial federal question, and remanded.
- Surprise v. Innovation Group, Inc. (District Court, D. Massachusetts 2013, 925 F. Supp. 2d 134)✓An employee fired after complaining that health-information documents went into unsecured trash sued for wrongful discharge. The court read 45 C.F.R. 164.530(c) to require safeguards without prescribing a method, and held HIPAA disposal rules are not well-defined public policy.
- Michael Terpin v. at and T Mobility LLC (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2024, 118 F.4th 1102)“…viders to protect patients’ “protected health information.” 45 C.F.R. § 164.530(c)(1); Moore, 299 Cal. Rptr. 3d at 561.…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Alaska Medical Records Retention Laws (2026 Guide), Arkansas Medical Records Retention Laws (2026 Guide), District of Columbia Medical Records Retention Laws (2026 Guide)
§ 164.524Access of individuals to protected health information.In forcecited in 23 of our articles
(a) Standard: Access to protected health information —(1) Right of access. Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (a)(2) or (a)(3) of this section, an individual has a right of access to inspect and obtain a copy of protected health information about the individual in a designated record set, for as long as the protected health information is maintained in the designated record set, except for: (i) Psychotherapy notes; and (ii) Information compiled in reasonable anticipation of, or for use in, a civil, criminal, or administrative action or proceeding. (2) Unreviewable grounds for denial. A covered entity may deny an individual access without providing the individual an opportunity for review, in the following circumstances. (i) The protected health information is excepted from the right of access by paragraph (a)(1) of this section.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ecfr.gov
Cited in 88 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Webb v. Smart Document Solutions, LLC (2007) held the reduced, cost-based fee in section 164.524(c)(4) applies only when the individual himself requests his records, not a law firm acting as his agent. Ciox Health, LLC v. Hargan (2020) vacated 2016 guidance that extended that patient rate to third-party directives.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Webb v. Smart Document Solutions, LLC (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2007, 499 F.3d 1078)✓A law firm ordered its client's hospital records and was billed a copying company's higher third-party rate; the Ninth Circuit held Section 164.524(c)(4)'s cost-based fee limit applies only when the individual or a personal representative asks, not an attorney acting as agent.
- Evenson v. Hartford Life & Annuity Insurance (District Court, M.D. Florida 2007, 244 F.R.D. 666)✓A therapist refused a subpoena for her psychotherapy notes, citing Section 164.524(a)(1)'s exclusion of those notes from a patient's right of access; the court held that exclusion governs only individual access, not discovery, and ordered the notes produced.
- Ciox Health, LLC v. Hargan (District Court, District of Columbia 2020)“…fee that can be charged for such production. See generally 45 C.F.R. § 164.524. For requests brought by an individual…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: North Carolina Medical Records Retention Laws (2026 Guide), Washington Medical Records Retention Laws (2026 Guide), South Carolina Medical Recording Laws: Patient Rights, HIPAA, and Consent (2026)
Kentucky Revised Statutes, Chapter 2: CITIZENSHIP, EMBLEMS, HOLIDAYS, AND TIME
§ 2.015Age of majority -- Exceptions. (Effective between July 15, 2026 and January 1, 2027)In forcecited in 4 of our articles
Persons of the age of eighteen (18) years are of the age of majority for all purposes in this Commonwealth except for the purchase of alcoholic beverages, sports wagering, and for purposes of care and treatment of children with disabilities, for which twenty-one (21) years is the age of majority, all other statutes to the contrary notwithstanding.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at apps.legislature.ky.gov
Cited in 33 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Leathers v. Ratliff (Court of Appeals of Kentucky 1996, 925 S.W.2d 197)“…978, the date the original child support order was entered, KRS 2.015 was in effect. The statute defines the…”
- Crowe v. Miller (Court of Appeals of Kentucky 1971, 467 S.W.2d 330)“…ars of age when the suit was filed and calling attention to KRS 2.015 and this court’s decision in Commonweal…”
- Commonwealth v. Hallahan (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) 1965, 391 S.W.2d 378)“…enacted in 1964 (c. 21, Acts of 1964) which now appears as KRS 2.015 impliedly amends KRS 402.-210 by reduci…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Kentucky Emancipation Laws: How Minors Become Emancipated in Kentucky (2026), Kentucky Name Change Laws: How to Petition the District Court
Kentucky Revised Statutes, Chapter 197: PENITENTIARIES
§ 197.025Restrictions on access to inmate and facility records -- Appeal procedure -- Restrictions on access to policies and procedureIn force
(1) KRS 61.870 to 61.884 to the contrary notwithstanding, no person shall have access to any records if the disclosure is deemed by the commissioner of the department or his designee to constitute a threat to the security of the inmate, any other inmate, correctional staff, the institution, or any other person. (2) KRS 61.870 to 61.884 to the contrary notwithstanding, the department shall not be required to comply with a request for any record from any inmate confined in a jail or any facility or any individual on active supervision under the jurisdiction of the department, unless the request is for a record which contains a specific reference to that individual. (3) KRS 61.870 to 61.884 to the contrary notwithstanding, all persons confined in a penal facility shall challenge any denial of an open record with the Attorney General by mailing or otherwise sending the appropriate documents to the Attorney General within twenty (20) days of the denial pursuant to the procedures set out in KRS 61.880(2) before an appeal can be filed in a Circuit Court.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at apps.legislature.ky.gov
Cited in 6 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Commonwealth, Department of Corrections v. Chestnut (Kentucky Supreme Court 2008, 250 S.W.3d 655)“…pect public records.” So, other than the exception found at KRS 197.025, which we will discuss more fully later…”
- Salinas v. Correct Care Solutions, LLC (Court of Appeals of Kentucky 2018, 559 S.W.3d 853)“…General ("OAG") to review the matter. See KRS 61.880 and KRS 197.025. The OAG notified Correct Care about th…”
- Valentine v. PERSONNEL CABINET, COM. (Court of Appeals of Kentucky 2010, 322 S.W.3d 505)“…then determined that the Cabinet had wrongfully relied upon KRS 197.025 when it told Valentine that “the Depart…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Kentucky Revised Statutes, Chapter 216B: LICENSURE AND REGULATION OF HEALTH FACILITIES AND SERVICES
§ 216B.042Licenses -- Authority to enter upon premises -- Authority for administrative regulationsIn force
(1) The cabinet shall: (a) Establish by promulgation of administrative regulation under KRS Chapter 13A reasonable application fees for licenses and promulgate other administrative regulations necessary for the proper administration of the licensure function; (b) Issue, deny, revoke, modify, or suspend licenses or provisional licenses in accordance with the provisions of this chapter; (c) Establish licensure standards and procedures to ensure safe, adequate, and efficient abortion facilities, health facilities and health services. These regulations, under KRS Chapter 13A, shall include, but need not be limited to: 1. Patient care standards and safety standards, minimum operating standards, minimum standards for training, required licenses for medical staff personnel, and minimum standards for maintaining patient records; 2. Licensure application and renewal procedures; and 3.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at apps.legislature.ky.gov
Cited in 5 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2020
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Tibbs v. Bunnell (Kentucky Supreme Court 2014, 448 S.W.3d 796)“…he same rationale noted in Francis, supra. In Kentucky, KRS 216B.042 grants the Cabinet for Health and Famil…”
- Cabinet for Human Resources v. Women's Health Services, Inc. (Court of Appeals of Kentucky 1994, 878 S.W.2d 806)“…ropriate. We agree. Under KRS 216B.040, KRS 216B.105, and KRS 216B.042, the Cabinet is charged with regulating…”
- University of Kentucky v. Bunnell (Court of Appeals of Kentucky 2017, 532 S.W.3d 658)“…216B.015 (definition), KRS 216B.040 (functions of cabinet), KRS 216B.042 (licenses; authority to enter upon prem…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- 902 KAR 20:016: Hospitals; Operations and Services (Section 3(11)(b)2, six-year retention)(apps.legislature.ky.gov).gov
- KRS 422.317: Copy of Patient's Medical Record to Be Supplied on Patient's Written Request(apps.legislature.ky.gov).gov
- KRS 422.355: Right to Access Medical Record of a Patient Under Age Eighteen(apps.legislature.ky.gov).gov
- KRS 2.015: Age of Majority, Exceptions(apps.legislature.ky.gov).gov
- 907 KAR 1:671: Conditions of Medicaid Provider Participation(apps.legislature.ky.gov).gov
- 907 KAR 1:632: Vision Program Coverage Provisions and Requirements (Section 7, provider documentation)(apps.legislature.ky.gov).gov
- 42 CFR 482.24: Conditions of Participation: Medical Record Services(ecfr.gov).gov
- 42 CFR 424.516(f): Maintaining and Providing Access to Documentation (seven years)(law.cornell.edu)
- 45 CFR 164.530: HIPAA Administrative Requirements(ecfr.gov).gov
- 45 CFR 164.524: HIPAA Right of Access to Protected Health Information(ecfr.gov).gov
- Does HIPAA Require Covered Entities to Keep Medical Records?(hhs.gov).gov
- Medical Record Maintenance and Access Requirements(cms.gov).gov
- HIPAA Right of Access Guidance(hhs.gov).gov
- Disposal of Protected Health Information FAQ(hhs.gov).gov
- Kentucky Cabinet for Health and Family Services, Office of Inspector General(chfs.ky.gov).gov
- Kentucky Board of Medical Licensure(kbml.ky.gov).gov