South Carolina
Medical Malpractice Laws in South Carolina (2026): Caps
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 18, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 18, 2026. · 6 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

South Carolina sets specific deadlines for medical malpractice claims, caps noneconomic (pain and suffering) damages with a figure that is adjusted for inflation each year, and requires patients to clear several pre-suit steps before filing. A claim generally must be brought within 3 years, an absolute 6-year outer deadline applies, and the noneconomic cap starts at a base figure set by statute and rises annually with the Consumer Price Index. The rules and figures below come from the South Carolina Code of Laws and the state's Revenue and Fiscal Affairs Office. This page is general legal information, not legal advice.
Statute of Limitations in South Carolina
Under S.C. Code 15-3-545(A), a medical malpractice action must be commenced within three years from the date of the treatment, omission, or operation giving rise to the claim, or within three years from the date the injury was discovered or reasonably should have been discovered. This combination means the clock can start at treatment or later, when a patient first learns of the harm.
The discovery rule is bounded by an absolute outer limit described in the next section. The practical deadline in any case also depends on the pre-suit Notice of Intent, which tolls the limitations period once it is filed.
For foreign-object cases, S.C. Code 15-3-545(B) allows two years from discovery, but never less than three years after the object or apparatus was left in the body. Minors have limited tolling under subsection (D), generally not more than seven years on account of minority.
Statute of Repose
South Carolina pairs the three-year limitation with a six-year statute of repose. Under S.C. Code 15-3-545(A), in no event may a medical malpractice action be brought more than six years from the date of the occurrence. A repose period is an absolute deadline that can expire before a patient even discovers the injury.

The principal exception is the foreign-object rule, which is measured from discovery rather than from the date of the procedure. Because the interaction between discovery, the six-year repose, and the pre-suit notice is technical, the controlling date should be calculated carefully.
Damage Caps in South Carolina
South Carolina caps noneconomic damages in medical malpractice cases but does not cap economic damages such as medical bills and lost earnings. Under S.C. Code 15-32-220, the base limit is $350,000 for each claimant against a single health care provider or institution, and $1,050,000 in the aggregate against all providers and institutions combined.
These base figures do not stay fixed. The statute directs the Revenue and Fiscal Affairs Office to adjust the limit each year for inflation using the Consumer Price Index, with the revised figure published in the State Register. The amounts published February 3, 2026 by the Revenue and Fiscal Affairs Office (up from $580,461 and $1,741,383 for the December 2024 index) are $596,001 against a single defendant and $1,788,002 in the aggregate, and the figure moves each year with the annual CPI calculation.
The cap is not absolute. S.C. Code 15-32-220 removes the limit if the jury or court finds the defendant was grossly negligent, willful, wanton, or reckless and that conduct proximately caused the noneconomic damages, if the defendant engaged in fraud or misrepresentation related to the claim, or if the defendant altered or destroyed medical records to avoid liability. No particular award is guaranteed, because a jury still decides the amount on the facts, subject to the cap.
Notice of Intent and Affidavit of Merit
South Carolina requires several steps before a malpractice lawsuit can be filed. Under S.C. Code 15-79-125, a plaintiff must first file a Notice of Intent to File Suit naming the defendants and stating the facts, and that notice must be accompanied by an affidavit of an expert witness meeting the requirements of S.C. Code 15-36-100. Filing the Notice of Intent tolls the applicable statutes of limitations.
After the Notice is served, the parties must participate in mandatory mediation, generally within ninety to one hundred twenty days. If mediation does not resolve the dispute, the plaintiff may then file the lawsuit within the period the statute allows. Expert testimony is generally required to establish the standard of care and how it was breached.
Who Can Be Liable and Comparative Negligence
Doctors, hospitals, nurses, and other licensed health care providers can be liable for failing to meet the professional standard of care. Hospitals may also be responsible for the conduct of their employees and, in some situations, for their own institutional negligence.
A separate emergency-care provision, S.C. Code 15-32-230, narrows liability for one category of defendant only: the physician. Where care is rendered in a genuine emergency involving an immediate threat of death or serious bodily injury to a patient in an emergency department or in an obstetrical or surgical suite, no physician may be held liable unless it is proven that the physician was grossly negligent. A parallel rule in subsection (B) covers emergency obstetrical care where there was no prior doctor-patient relationship or the patient received no prenatal care.
That shield is also conditional. Under subsection (C), it applies only if the patient is not medically stable and is either in immediate threat of death or in immediate threat of serious bodily injury, and only to care rendered before the patient is discharged from the emergency department or the obstetrical or surgical suite. Hospitals, nurses, and other non-physician providers are not covered by 15-32-230, and they remain subject to the ordinary negligence standard even in an emergency.

South Carolina follows modified comparative negligence. A plaintiff who is partly at fault may still recover, but only if found 50% or less responsible, and the damages are reduced in proportion to the plaintiff's share of fault. A plaintiff who is more than 50% at fault recovers nothing.
Wrongful-Death Medical Malpractice
When malpractice causes death, South Carolina law allows a wrongful-death claim brought by the personal representative for the benefit of the statutory beneficiaries. These claims run against the medical malpractice deadlines and the pre-suit Notice of Intent framework, and the noneconomic cap in S.C. Code 15-32-220 applies to the noneconomic portion of the recovery.
Because the timing rules for a death claim can differ from those for an injury claim, families should confirm the controlling deadline rather than assuming a single fixed period.
How to Evaluate and Preserve a Potential Claim
If you think you may have a claim, request your complete medical records, note the key dates, and consult a licensed South Carolina attorney promptly, because the deadlines are strict and the Notice of Intent and affidavit take time to prepare. Many malpractice attorneys offer a free initial consultation and handle cases on a contingency-fee basis, meaning fees are typically paid only out of a recovery.

No attorney can guarantee an outcome or a specific dollar amount, and only a licensed professional reviewing your records can assess your individual situation.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the deadline to sue for medical malpractice in South Carolina?
The general deadline is 3 years from the treatment, omission, or operation, or 3 years from discovery, under S.C. Code 15-3-545(A). A separate 6-year statute of repose bars most claims filed more than 6 years after the occurrence. Filing a Notice of Intent tolls the period. Because exceptions are fact-specific, confirm your exact deadline with a licensed South Carolina attorney.
Does South Carolina cap medical malpractice damages?
Yes, on noneconomic damages only. The base limits in S.C. Code 15-32-220 are $350,000 against a single provider or institution and $1,050,000 in the aggregate, and both are adjusted for inflation each year by the Revenue and Fiscal Affairs Office. Economic damages such as medical bills and lost wages are not capped, and the cap does not apply in cases of gross negligence, fraud, or altered records.
What is the current South Carolina noneconomic damages cap amount?
The cap rises each year with the Consumer Price Index, so the exact figure changes annually. The amounts published February 3, 2026 by the Revenue and Fiscal Affairs Office are $596,001 against a single defendant and $1,788,002 in the aggregate (up from $580,461 and $1,741,383 the year before). Each year's figure is published in the State Register by the Revenue and Fiscal Affairs Office, which should be checked for the controlling number.
Do I need an expert affidavit to file a malpractice case in South Carolina?
Yes. Under S.C. Code 15-79-125 you must first file a Notice of Intent to File Suit accompanied by an expert witness affidavit meeting the requirements of S.C. Code 15-36-100, and then participate in mandatory mediation before filing the lawsuit. Expert testimony is generally needed to prove the claim.
Is there a statute of repose for medical malpractice in South Carolina?
Yes. S.C. Code 15-3-545(A) sets a 6-year statute of repose, an absolute outer deadline measured from the occurrence, regardless of when the injury was discovered. The main exception is the foreign-object rule, which runs from discovery.
How does comparative fault affect a South Carolina malpractice case?
South Carolina uses modified comparative negligence. You can recover only if you are found 50% or less at fault, and your damages are reduced by your percentage of fault. At more than 50% fault, you recover nothing.
What is the deadline for a wrongful-death malpractice claim in South Carolina?
A wrongful-death medical malpractice claim runs against the malpractice deadlines and the pre-suit Notice of Intent framework, and the noneconomic cap in S.C. Code 15-32-220 applies to the noneconomic portion. Because death-claim timing can differ from injury-claim timing, confirm the controlling deadline with a licensed attorney.
How much is a South Carolina medical malpractice case worth?
There is no formula, and no one can promise a result. Value depends on the specific facts, the evidence, the economic losses, and the jury's view of noneconomic harm, which is capped by the inflation-adjusted limit in S.C. Code 15-32-220 unless an exception applies. Every case is different and outcomes are never guaranteed.
Harmed by medical care in South Carolina? Get a free case review
If a medical provider's negligence caused a serious injury, you may be owed compensation, but medical malpractice cases have strict deadlines and special filing rules that vary by state. Get a free, confidential review from a South Carolina medical malpractice attorney. Most work on contingency, so there is no upfront cost.
Updates
Corrected the emergency-care section to state that the gross-negligence liability shield in S.C. Code 15-32-230 protects physicians only, subject to the statute’s medical-stability and pre-discharge conditions, and not hospitals or nurses; also replaced a dead link to the state Revenue and Fiscal Affairs Office inflation-adjustment index.
Updated the South Carolina medical-malpractice noneconomic-damages cap to the figures the Revenue and Fiscal Affairs Office published on February 3, 2026: $596,001 per provider or institution and $1,788,002 in the aggregate.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
South Carolina Code of Laws, Title 15: CIVIL REMEDIES AND PROCEDURES
§ 15-32-220Noneconomic damages limit; exceptions; annual adjustment based on Consumer Price IndexIn force
(A) In an action on a medical malpractice claim when final judgment is rendered against a single health care provider, the limit of civil liability for noneconomic damages of the health care provider is limited to an amount not to exceed three hundred fifty thousand dollars for each claimant, regardless of the number of separate causes of action on which the claim is based, except as provided in subsection (E). (B) In an action on a medical malpractice claim when final judgment is rendered against a single health care institution, the limit of civil liability for noneconomic damages is limited to an amount not to exceed three hundred fifty thousand dollars for each claimant, regardless of the number of separate causes of action on which the claim is based, except as provided in subsection (E).
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-07 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at scstatehouse.gov
Cited in 4 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Pratt v. Amisub of SC, Inc. (Court of Appeals of South Carolina 2025)“…avoiding a claim or liability to the claimant. S.C. Code Ann. § 15-32-220 (A)-(E) (2005 & Supp. 2024). Appellant…”
- Boyle ex rel. Estate of Boyle v. United States (District Court, D. South Carolina 2012, 948 F. Supp. 2d 577)“…claim is based, except as provided in subsection (E). 4 S.C. Code Ann. § 15-32-220 (A) (emphasis added). 10. Here, the p…”
- Reid v. United States (District Court, D. South Carolina 2024)“…lpractice based solely on the fact that his complaint cites S.C. Code Ann. § 15-32-220—a provision capping noneconomic damage…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 15-3-545Actions for medical malpracticeIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
(A) In any action, other than actions controlled by subsection (B), to recover damages for injury to the person arising out of any medical, surgical, or dental treatment, omission, or operation by any licensed health care provider as defined in Article 5, Chapter 79, Title 38 acting within the scope of his profession must be commenced within three years from the date of the treatment, omission, or operation giving rise to the cause of action or three years from date of discovery or when it reasonably ought to have been discovered, not to exceed six years from date of occurrence, or as tolled by this section.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at scstatehouse.gov
Cited in 33 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Jenkins v. Meares (Supreme Court of South Carolina 1990, 302 S.C. 142)“…that the action is barred by the statute of limitations in S.C. Code Ann. § 15-3-545 (Supp. 1989), as it existed prior to a…”
- O'TUEL v. Villani (Court of Appeals of South Carolina 1995, 318 S.C. 24)“…nts’ claim was barred by the six-year statute of repose in S.C. Code Ann. § 15-3-545 (Supp. 1993). Under this statute, an a…”
- Columbia/CSA-HS Greater Columbia Healthcare System, LP v. South Carolina Medical Malpractice Liability Joint Underwriting Ass'n (Supreme Court of South Carolina 2015, 411 S.C. 557)“…Liab. Joint Underwriting Ass'n, 394 S.C. 68, 75, 713 1 S.C. Code Ann. § 15-3-545 (2005). 2 Cf. Simmons v. Tuomey Reg'l…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: South Carolina Statute of Limitations: Filing Deadlines by Case Type
§ 15-79-125Notice of Intent to File Suit as prerequisite to filing action; subpoena of medical of records; depositions; mandatory prelitigation mediation; initiating action; ADR participationIn force
(A) Prior to filing or initiating a civil action alleging injury or death as a result of medical malpractice, the plaintiff shall contemporaneously file a Notice of Intent to File Suit and an affidavit of an expert witness, subject to the affidavit requirements established in Section 15-36-100, in a county in which venue would be proper for filing or initiating the civil action. The notice must name all adverse parties as defendants, must contain a short and plain statement of the facts showing that the party filing the notice is entitled to relief, must be signed by the plaintiff or by his attorney, and must include any standard interrogatories or similar disclosures required by the South Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure. Filing the Notice of Intent to File Suit tolls all applicable statutes of limitations. The Notice of Intent to File Suit must be served upon all named defendants in accordance with the service rules for a summons and complaint outlined in the South Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at scstatehouse.gov
Cited in 23 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Brouwer v. Sisters of Charity Providence Hospitals (Supreme Court of South Carolina 2014, 409 S.C. 514)“…e proper for filing or initiating the civil action. S.C. Code Ann. § 15-79-125(A) (Supp. 2013) (emphasis added). 2…”
- Wilkinson v. East Cooper Community Hospital, Inc. (Supreme Court of South Carolina 2014, 410 S.C. 163)“…File Suit tolls all applicable statutes of limitations. S.C. Code Ann. § 15-79-125(A) (Supp. 2013) (emphasis added). 2…”
- Dean v. Heritage Healthcare of Ridgeway, LLC (Supreme Court of South Carolina 2014, 408 S.C. 371)“…as well as an expert affidavit in support of her NOI. See S.C. Code Ann. § 15-79-125 (Supp. 2012). Respondent also alleged c…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 15-36-100Complaint in actions for damages alleging professional negligence; contemporaneous affidavit of expert specifying negligent act or omissionIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
(A) As used in this section, "expert witness" means an expert who is qualified as to the acceptable conduct of the professional whose conduct is at issue and who: (1) is licensed by an appropriate regulatory agency to practice his or her profession in the location in which the expert practices or teaches; and (2)(a) is board certified by a national or international association or academy which administers written and oral examinations for certification in the area of practice or specialty about which the opinion on the standard of care is offered; or (b) has actual professional knowledge and experience in the area of practice or specialty in which the opinion is to be given as the result of having been regularly engaged in: (i) the active practice of the area of specialty of his or her profession for at least three of the last five years immediately preceding the opinion; (ii) the teaching of the area of practice or specialty of his or her profession for at least half of his or her professional time as an employed member of the faculty of an educational institution which is accredited in the teaching of his or her profession for at least three of the last five years…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at scstatehouse.gov
Cited in 44 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Charles Blanchard v. 480 King Street, LLC (Supreme Court of South Carolina 2026)“…lable evidence at the time of the filing of the affidavit." S.C. Code Ann. § 15-36-100(B). Subsection 15-36-100(A) defines an…”
- Brouwer v. Sisters of Charity Providence Hospitals (Supreme Court of South Carolina 2014, 409 S.C. 514)“…is needed to evaluate the conduct of the defendant. S.C. Code Ann. § 15-36-100(C)(2) (Supp. 2013) (emphasis added).…”
- Eades v. Palmetto Cardiovascular & Thoracic, PA (Supreme Court of South Carolina 2018, 422 S.C. 196)“…ased upon my education, training, and experience. S.C. Code § 15-36-100(A)(3). To qualify under this provision,…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: South Carolina Medical Recording Laws: Patient Rights, HIPAA, and Consent (2026)
Explore the law
This article also draws on these acts and chapters (opening at their first section): South Carolina Code of Laws, Title 15: CIVIL REMEDIES AND PROCEDURES § 15-32-200 (Citation of article)
Related law for further reading — not part of this article’s citations.
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- S.C. Code Title 15, Chapter 32 (Noneconomic Damage Awards), including 15-32-220 (noneconomic damages limit, CPI adjustment, exceptions) and 15-32-230 (emergency care), South Carolina Legislature Online(scstatehouse.gov).gov
- S.C. Code 15-3-545 (Actions for medical malpractice): 3-year limitation, 6-year statute of repose, foreign-object rule, and minority tolling, South Carolina Legislature Online(scstatehouse.gov).gov
- S.C. Code Title 15, Chapter 79, including 15-79-125 (Notice of Intent to File Suit, expert witness affidavit, mandatory mediation), South Carolina Legislature Online(scstatehouse.gov).gov
- South Carolina Revenue and Fiscal Affairs Office, Inflation Adjustments for Legal Proceedings (annual CPI-adjusted noneconomic medical malpractice damages limit under 15-32-220, published in the State Register)(rfa.sc.gov).gov
- S.C. Code 15-36-100 (affidavit of expert witness requirements applicable to professional negligence claims), South Carolina Legislature Online(scstatehouse.gov).gov
- S.C. Revenue and Fiscal Affairs Office memorandum (Feb. 3, 2026): medical malpractice noneconomic damages limitation, inflation component: $596,001 single provider/institution, $1,788,002 aggregate(rfa.sc.gov).gov
- South Carolina Revenue and Fiscal Affairs Office, Inflation Adjustments for Legal Proceedings (annual CPI-adjusted noneconomic medical malpractice damages limit under 15-32-220, published in the State Register)(rfa.sc.gov)