Nevada
Nevada Laws on Recording in Public: Rights and Restrictions (2026)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 15, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 15, 2026. · 8 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Nevada allows photography and silent video in public under First Amendment protections, with no consent required. In-person audio recording follows one-party consent under NRS 200.650, because people in public spaces have no reasonable expectation of privacy for their conversations and activities.
Recording in public places is broadly legal in Nevada. Photographs, video, and audio recording are all protected activities when conducted in public spaces where people do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy. However, Nevada's split consent recording framework adds specific rules for audio: in-person conversations follow one-party consent under NRS 200.650, while phone calls require all-party consent under NRS 200.620.
This guide covers what you can record in public, the limits of public recording rights, how private property open to the public works, and special situations like recording at protests, government meetings, and tourist destinations.
The General Rule: Public Places Have No Privacy Expectation
Why Public Recording Is Legal
Nevada's recording laws protect private communications. Conversations and activities that occur in public places, where participants have no reasonable expectation that they are not being observed, are generally not protected by recording consent statutes.
When you walk down the Las Vegas Strip, sit in a public park in Reno, or stand on a sidewalk in Henderson, you are in a space where:
- Other people can freely observe you
- Security cameras are likely recording you
- Your words and actions are visible and audible to passersby
- You have no reasonable expectation that your activities are private
Because there is no privacy expectation, recording in these spaces requires no consent.
What You Can Record in Public
In Nevada public spaces, you can freely:
- Take photographs of people, buildings, landscapes, and events
- Record video of anything visible from a public vantage point
- Record audio of conversations you participate in (one-party consent under NRS 200.650)
- Livestream events occurring in public
- Record law enforcement performing duties (NRS 171.1233)
- Record public government meetings
- Film yourself walking, talking, or narrating
Audio Recording in Public: The Split Consent Rules

In-Person Conversations
When you are in a public place and participate in a conversation, you can record the audio under NRS 200.650's one-party consent rule. Your own participation satisfies the consent requirement.
However, even in public, some conversations may carry a privacy expectation. Two people speaking quietly at a secluded park bench may reasonably believe their conversation is private. The analysis depends on the totality of circumstances: the location, volume, whether steps were taken to ensure privacy, and whether the speakers knew or should have known others could hear.
Generally no privacy expectation:
- Conversations at normal volume on a busy sidewalk
- Discussions at public events and gatherings
- Comments made at public meetings or hearings
- Statements made to you directly in a public place
Potentially private even in public:
- Whispered conversations in a secluded area
- Discussions where participants deliberately moved away from others
- Conversations in semi-private booths or enclosures
Phone Calls in Public
Even if you are standing on a public sidewalk, recording a phone call requires all-party consent under NRS 200.620. The location of the recording does not change the consent standard for wire communications.
This means:
- You cannot record your own phone call in public without the other party's consent
- You cannot hold up your phone to record someone else's phone conversation
- The all-party rule applies whether you are in a crowded casino or an empty desert road
Recording on Private Property Open to the Public

The Property Owner's Right to Set Rules
Private property that is open to the public, such as shopping malls, restaurants, casinos, retail stores, and theme parks, presents a middle ground. While these locations are accessible to the public, they are privately owned and the property owner can set rules about recording.
A property owner can:
- Prohibit photography and video recording on their premises
- Ask you to stop recording and leave if you refuse
- Restrict recording in certain areas while allowing it in others
- Trespass you from the property for violating recording policies
If you refuse to stop recording after being asked by the property owner or their authorized representative, you can be charged with trespass under NRS 207.200.
Common Examples
| Location | Recording Usually Allowed? | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Public sidewalk | Yes | No restrictions |
| Public park | Yes | No restrictions |
| Government building lobby | Generally yes | May have specific security rules |
| Shopping mall interior | Subject to mall policy | Private property |
| Restaurant | Subject to restaurant policy | Private property |
| Casino gaming floor | Subject to casino rules | Heavily surveilled by casino |
| Concert or sporting event | Subject to venue policy | Ticket terms may prohibit |
| Movie theater | No (copyright and venue rules) | Federal copyright protections |
Casino Recording Rules
Nevada casinos have unique rules about patron recording. While casinos themselves operate extensive surveillance systems under Nevada Gaming Control Board regulations, many casinos restrict or prohibit patron photography and video on the gaming floor. These restrictions are typically posted and enforced by security staff. Violating casino recording policies can result in being asked to leave and potentially trespassed from the property.
Recording Government Activities in Public

Public Meetings
Nevada's Open Meeting Law (NRS 241) requires that meetings of public bodies be open to the public. Under NRS 241.020, all meetings must be open and public, and any person may attend and observe.
You have the right to record public meetings of:
- City and county commissions and councils
- School boards
- State agency boards and commissions
- Legislative committee hearings
- Any other public body subject to the Open Meeting Law
The public body may establish reasonable rules about recording that do not effectively prohibit it, such as requiring cameras to be stationary or restricting flash photography.
Government Buildings
You can generally record in public areas of government buildings, including lobbies, hallways, and service counters. Specific security areas (courtrooms during proceedings, restricted areas, jail intake areas) may have additional restrictions.
Federal buildings in Nevada are subject to federal regulations. The General Services Administration allows photography and filming in public areas of federal buildings, but individual agencies may impose additional restrictions.
Courts and Courtrooms
Recording in Nevada courtrooms is governed by the Nevada Supreme Court Rules. Under ADKT 0521, media recording of court proceedings may be allowed at the discretion of the presiding judge. Members of the public generally cannot record in courtrooms without specific court permission.
Recording at Protests and Demonstrations
Your Rights
Recording protests, demonstrations, and public gatherings is a protected First Amendment activity. In Nevada:
- You can record any protest from any location where you are legally present
- NRS 171.1233 protects your right to record police activity at protests
- The Ninth Circuit recognizes the right to record matters of public interest
- You cannot be singled out for arrest solely because you are recording
Limitations
Your right to record at protests does not allow you to:
- Enter areas that have been lawfully closed by police
- Ignore lawful dispersal orders
- Physically interfere with police operations
- Trespass on private property to get a better recording angle
If police issue a dispersal order, you must comply even though you have a right to record. You can continue recording while leaving the area.
Drones and Aerial Recording in Public
FAA Regulations
Drone recording in Nevada is subject to Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) regulations. Recreational and commercial drone operators must:
- Register their drone with the FAA
- Follow airspace restrictions
- Maintain visual line of sight
- Not fly over 400 feet in uncontrolled airspace
- Not fly near airports without authorization
State and Local Drone Rules
Nevada enacted NRS 493.103, a civil trespass law aimed at repeated low-altitude drone flights. Key provisions include:
- A property owner or lawful occupant may sue a drone operator for trespass if the drone has been flown at less than 250 feet over the property on at least one prior occasion and the owner then notified the operator that further low-altitude flights were not authorized
- A prevailing plaintiff can recover treble damages for injury to person or property, plus attorney's fees, costs, and injunctive relief
- The law does not apply to drones in a lawful landing flight path, to law enforcement or public-agency drones operating under separate statutory authority, or to drones operated by a registered business or land surveyor within the lawful scope of their activities
Repeated low-altitude drone flights over your property after you have given notice can support a trespass claim under NRS 493.103. Using a drone to record through someone's window or over a fenced backyard could separately violate NRS 200.604 (voyeurism) if it captures a person's private area without consent.
Street Photography and Tourism Recording
Photographing People in Public
Nevada does not have a specific statute restricting photography of people in public places. The First Amendment protects the right to photograph anything visible from a public space. This includes:
- Photographing tourists on the Las Vegas Strip
- Filming street performers and public art
- Recording public events and parades
- Photographing government buildings and landmarks
Commercial Use
Using public recordings for commercial purposes (advertising, stock photography, merchandise) may require model releases from identifiable individuals under Nevada's right of publicity law (NRS 597.790). The recording itself is legal; the commercial use of someone's likeness without consent is a separate issue.
The Voyeurism Limit: NRS 200.604
Even in completely public places, recording crosses the line when it targets a person's private body areas. NRS 200.604 prohibits capturing images of a person's "private area" without consent, regardless of where the recording takes place.
Upskirt photography on a public escalator, downblouse photography on a public bench, or using a long lens to capture private body areas from a public sidewalk are all violations of NRS 200.604.
More Nevada Recording Laws
Audio Recording | Video Recording | Voyeurism & Hidden Cameras | Workplace Recording | Recording Police | Phone Call Recording | Security Cameras | Recording in Public | Landlord-Tenant | Dashcam Laws | Schools | Medical Recording
More Nevada Recording Topics
More Nevada Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Is it legal to record people in public in Nevada?
Yes. Photography and video recording in public places are generally legal in Nevada. People in public spaces have no reasonable expectation of privacy for their activities and appearance. However, capturing images of private body areas (upskirt, downblouse) violates NRS 200.604 even in public places.
Can I record audio of conversations in public in Nevada?
For in-person conversations you participate in, yes, under NRS 200.650's one-party consent rule. For phone calls, you need all-party consent under NRS 200.620 regardless of whether you are in a public place. Recording other people's private conversations you are not part of may still be illegal if the speakers had a reasonable privacy expectation.
Can a store or restaurant stop me from recording in Nevada?
Yes. Private property owners, including stores, restaurants, malls, and casinos, can prohibit recording on their premises. If you refuse to stop recording after being asked, you can be trespassed from the property under NRS 207.200. The property owner controls recording policies on private property.
Can I record a public government meeting in Nevada?
Yes. Nevada's Open Meeting Law (NRS 241) requires public body meetings to be open. You have the right to record these meetings. The public body may set reasonable rules about recording (such as stationary cameras) but cannot effectively prohibit it.
Can I fly a drone to record in public in Nevada?
Drones can record in public spaces subject to FAA regulations. You must register your drone and follow airspace rules. NRS 493.103 lets a property owner sue for trespass over repeated low-altitude flights (under 250 feet) made after the owner has given notice, and using a drone to record through someone's window could separately violate NRS 200.604's voyeurism law.
Updates
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected the description of NRS 493.103: it is a civil trespass statute for repeated low-altitude drone overflights after notice, not a privacy/surveillance-restriction or law-enforcement-warrant law.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Nevada Revised Statutes, Chapter 200: CRIMES AGAINST THE PERSON
§ 200.650Unauthorized, surreptitious intrusion of privacy by listening device prohibited.In forcecited in 19 of our articles
Except as otherwise provided in NRS 179.410 to 179.515, inclusive, and 704.195, a person shall not intrude upon the privacy of other persons by surreptitiously listening to, monitoring or recording, or attempting to listen to, monitor or record, by means of any mechanical, electronic or other listening device, any private conversation engaged in by the other persons, or disclose the existence, content, substance, purport, effect or meaning of any conversation so listened to, monitored or recorded, unless authorized to do so by one of the persons engaging in the conversation.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-26 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at leg.state.nv.us
Cited in 13 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Nevada courts read NRS 200.650 to permit a recording authorized by a participant. Summers v. State (1986) upheld a body-wire recording because the informant taking part in the conversation authorized it. Abid v. Abid (2017) held the section carries no suppression rule, so a custody expert could consider recordings made in violation of it.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Lane v. Allstate Insurance (Nevada Supreme Court 1998, 114 Nev. 1176)✓A former employee secretly taped hundreds of phone calls with company personnel; the court read NRS 200.650 as allowing in-person private conversations to be recorded when one participant authorizes it, and contrasted that in holding NRS 200.620 bars one-party taping of calls.
- Summers v. State (Nevada Supreme Court 1986, 102 Nev. 195)✓Police taped a transmitter to an informant, who recorded his conversation with Summers about the murder guns; the court held such a recording needs no court order so long as the authorization requirement of NRS 200.650 is met, and the informant had authorized it.
- ABID VS. ABID (CHILD CUSTODY) (Nevada Supreme Court 2017, 2017 NV 94)“…to this recording, the father's actions likely violated NRS 200.650, which prohibits the…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Nevada Recording Laws (2026): Hybrid One-Party/All-Party Consent, Nevada Windshield Mounting Laws (2026 Guide), Nevada Dashcam Laws: Legal Rules for Dashboard Cameras (2026)
§ 200.604Capturing image of private area of another person; distributing, disclosing, displaying, transmitting or publishing image of private area of another person; penalties; exceptions; confidentiality of image.In forcecited in 12 of our articles
1. Except as otherwise provided in subsection 4, a person shall not knowingly and intentionally capture an image of the private area of another person: (a) Without the consent of the other person; and (b) Under circumstances in which the other person has a reasonable expectation of privacy. 2. Except as otherwise provided in subsection 4, a person shall not distribute, disclose, display, transmit or publish an image that the person knows or has reason to know was made in violation of subsection 1. 3. Unless a greater penalty is provided pursuant to NRS 200.780 or 212.188, a person who violates this section: (a) For a first offense, is guilty of a gross misdemeanor. (b) For a second or subsequent offense, is guilty of a category E felony and shall be punished as provided in NRS 193.130. 4. This section does not prohibit any lawful law enforcement or correctional activity, including, without limitation, capturing, distributing, disclosing, displaying, transmitting or publishing an image for the purpose of investigating or prosecuting a violation of this section.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at leg.state.nv.us
Cited in 4 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2018
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Coleman v. State (Nevada Supreme Court 2018, 416 P.3d 238)“…By the Court, PICKERING, J.: NRS 200.604 prohibits a person from knowingly and i…”
- COLEMAN (SOLOMON) VS. STATE (Nevada Supreme Court 2018, 2018 NV 28)“…y the Court, PICKERING, J.: NRS 200.604 prohibits a person from knowingly and…”
- Brian Olsen v. City of Henderson (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2016, 648 F. App'x 628)“…amily. Nichols reasonably believed that Olsen had violated Nev. Rev. Stat. § 200.604 by capturing and publishing to his per…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Nevada Landlord-Tenant Recording Laws: Rights for Renters and Property Owners (2026), Nevada Medical Recording Laws: Patient Rights and Healthcare Privacy (2026), Nevada School Recording Laws: Rules for Students, Parents, and Teachers (2026)
§ 200.620Interception and attempted interception of wire communication prohibited; exceptions.In forcecited in 18 of our articles
1. Except as otherwise provided in subsection 5 and NRS 179.410 to 179.515, inclusive, 209.419 and 704.195, it is unlawful for any person to intercept or attempt to intercept any wire communication unless: (a) The interception or attempted interception is made with the prior consent of one of the parties to the communication; and (b) An emergency situation exists and it is impractical to obtain a court order as required by NRS 179.410 to 179.515, inclusive, before the interception, in which event the interception is subject to the requirements of subsection 3. If the application for ratification is denied, any use or disclosure of the information so intercepted is unlawful, and the person who made the interception shall notify the sender and the receiver of the communication that: (1) The communication was intercepted; and (2) Upon application to the court, ratification of the interception was denied.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at leg.state.nv.us
Cited in 18 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Nevada reads NRS 200.620 as an all-party consent rule for phone recording, with a territorial limit. Lane v. Allstate Insurance held a participant who taped his own calls without the other parties' consent violated it; DITECH FINANCIAL, LLC VS. BUCKLES held it does not reach calls recorded from outside Nevada.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Lane v. Allstate Insurance (Nevada Supreme Court 1998, 114 Nev. 1176)✓A former employee secretly taped hundreds of his own phone calls with his ex-employer's staff to build his suit; the court held NRS 200.620 bars recording a call without every party's consent, so the tapes were excluded and the dismissal of his suit was reversed.
- State v. Reyes (Nevada Supreme Court 1991, 107 Nev. 191)✓Police had an interpreter listen on a station extension phone while an informant set up a drug buy; the court held that officers' use of regularly installed telephone equipment in the ordinary course of their duties is not an interception under NRS 200.620.
- ABID VS. ABID (CHILD CUSTODY) (Nevada Supreme Court 2017, 2017 NV 94)“…corded phone conversations in violation of NRS 200.620 to obtain evidence to support tort…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Nevada Audio Recording Laws: Split Consent Rules and Penalties (2026), Nevada Security Camera Laws: Installation Rules and Privacy Limits (2026), Nevada Video Recording Laws: When Consent Is Required (2026)
Nevada Revised Statutes, Chapter 171: PROCEEDINGS TO COMMITMENT
§ 171.1233Recording of law enforcement activity.In forcecited in 4 of our articles
1. A person who is not under arrest or in the custody of a peace officer may record a law enforcement activity and maintain custody and control of that recording and any property or instruments used by the person to record a law enforcement activity. A person who is under arrest or in the custody of a peace officer does not, by that status alone, forfeit the right to have any such recordings, property or instruments maintained and returned to him or her. This subsection must not be construed to authorize a person to engage in actions that interfere with or obstruct a law enforcement activity or otherwise violate any other law in an effort to record a law enforcement activity.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at leg.state.nv.us
Also relied on in: Nevada Smart Glasses Recording Laws 2026, Nevada Laws on Recording Police: Your Rights Under NRS 171.1233 (2026)
Nevada Revised Statutes, Chapter 207: MISCELLANEOUS CRIMES
§ 207.200Unlawful trespass upon land; warning against trespassing.In force
1. Unless a greater penalty is provided pursuant to NRS 200.603, any person who, under circumstances not amounting to a burglary: (a) Goes upon the land or into any building of another with intent to vex or annoy the owner or occupant thereof, or to commit any unlawful act; or (b) Willfully goes or remains upon any land or in any building after having been warned during the previous 36 months by the owner or occupant thereof not to trespass, Ê is guilty of a misdemeanor. The meaning of this subsection is not limited by subsections 2 and 4.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at leg.state.nv.us
Cited in 28 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Jordan v. State Ex Rel. Department of Motor Vehicles & Public Safety (Nevada Supreme Court 2005, 121 Nev. 44)“…building for trespassing on state property in violation of NRS 207.200(l)(b), which prohibits people from will…”
- Scott v. Justice's Court of Tahoe Township (Nevada Supreme Court 1968, 84 Nev. 9)“…ndents. The main issue concerns the Nevada trespass statute NRS 207.200. Subordinate issues involve the filing…”
- STATE, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GEN. VS. JUSTICE CT. (ESCALANTE) (Nevada Supreme Court 2017, 2017 NV 12)“…with one count of trespass in violation of NRS 207.200(1)(a). Escalante moved to dismiss…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Nevada Revised Statutes, Chapter 241: MEETINGS OF STATE AND LOCAL AGENCIES
§ 241.020Meetings to be open and public; size of facilities; limitations on closure of meetings; notice of meetings; copy of materials; exceptions.In force
1. Except as otherwise provided by specific statute, all meetings of public bodies must be open and public, and all persons must be permitted to attend any meeting of these public bodies at a physical location or by means of a remote technology system. A meeting that is closed pursuant to a specific statute may only be closed to the extent specified in the statute allowing the meeting to be closed. All other portions of the meeting must be open and public, and the public body must comply with all other provisions of this chapter to the extent not specifically precluded by the specific statute. Public officers and employees responsible for these meetings shall make reasonable efforts to assist and accommodate persons with physical disabilities desiring to attend. 2. If any portion of a meeting is open to the public, the public officers and employees responsible for the meeting must make reasonable efforts to ensure the facilities for the meeting are large enough to accommodate the anticipated number of attendees.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at leg.state.nv.us
Cited in 26 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- McKay v. Board of Sup'rs of Carson City (Nevada Supreme Court 1986, 102 Nev. 644)“…n was submitted. The meeting was noticed in accordance with NRS 241.020(3)(a) 1 and the Board was…”
- Attorney General v. Nevada Tax Comm'n (Nevada Supreme Court 2008, 124 Nev. 232)“…urt, Hardesty, J.; Nevada’s Open Meeting Law, NRS 241.020, provides that all meetings of public b…”
- Stockmeier v. Nevada Department of Corrections Psychological Review Panel (Nevada Supreme Court 2006, 122 Nev. 385)“…ge of the open meeting law to attend a public meeting under NRS 241.020(1). Similarly, prisoners are not free t…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Nevada Revised Statutes, Chapter 493: GENERAL PROVISIONS
§ 493.103Unmanned aerial vehicles: Action for trespass against owner or operator; exceptions; award of treble damages for injury to person or property; award of attorney’s fees and costs and injunctive relief.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
1. Except as otherwise provided in subsection 2, a person who owns or lawfully occupies real property in this State may bring an action for trespass against the owner or operator of an unmanned aerial vehicle that is flown at a height of less than 250 feet over the property if: (a) The owner or operator of the unmanned aerial vehicle has flown the unmanned aerial vehicle over the property at a height of less than 250 feet on at least one previous occasion; and (b) The person who owns or occupies the real property notified the owner or operator of the unmanned aerial vehicle that the person did not authorize the flight of the unmanned aerial vehicle over the property at a height of less than 250 feet. For the purposes of this paragraph, a person may place the owner or operator of an unmanned aerial vehicle on notice in the manner prescribed in subsection 2 of NRS 207.200. 2. A person may not bring an action pursuant to subsection 1 if: (a) The unmanned aerial vehicle is lawfully in the flight path for landing at an airport, airfield or runway. (b) The unmanned aerial vehicle is in the process of taking off or landing.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at leg.state.nv.us
Also relied on in: Nevada Drone Laws: Trespass, Warrants & Critical Facilities
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- NRS 200.650 - Surreptitious Intrusion of Privacy(leg.state.nv.us).gov
- NRS 200.620 - Interception of Wire Communications(leg.state.nv.us).gov
- NRS 171.1233 - Right to Record Law Enforcement(leg.state.nv.us).gov
- NRS 200.604 - Voyeurism(leg.state.nv.us).gov
- NRS 241.020 - Open Meeting Law(leg.state.nv.us).gov
- FAA Unmanned Aircraft Systems(faa.gov).gov
- NRS 207.200 - Trespass(leg.state.nv.us).gov
- NRS 493.103 - Drone Trespass (Repeated Low-Altitude Overflight)(leg.state.nv.us).gov