EnglishEspañol
Michigan flag

Michigan

Michigan Phone Call Recording Laws: Rules for Landlines, Cell Phones, and VoIP (2026)

Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 15, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 7, 2026. · 7 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Michigan Phone Call Recording Laws: Rules for Landlines, Cell Phones, and VoIP (2026)

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I record a phone call in Michigan without telling the other person?

Yes. Under Michigan's participant exception from Sullivan v. Gray (1982), you can record any phone call you are a party to without informing the other person. This applies to landline, cell phone, and VoIP calls. You do not need to announce the recording or obtain consent.

What if I am calling someone in an all-party consent state from Michigan?

When calling someone in an all-party consent state like California, Florida, or Pennsylvania, the stricter state's law may apply. To avoid legal risk, consider disclosing that you are recording. A simple statement at the start of the call satisfies even the strictest state laws.

Can a business record customer phone calls in Michigan?

Yes. Michigan businesses can record calls where an employee participates under the participant exception. However, best practice is to play an automated notice at the start of the call informing the caller that the call may be recorded. This satisfies all-party consent requirements for callers in other states and builds customer trust.

Can I use a recorded phone call as evidence in court in Michigan?

Yes. Phone call recordings made legally under the participant exception are admissible in Michigan courts. You must establish that the recording is authentic, has not been altered, and is relevant to the case. Illegally recorded calls are typically inadmissible and may expose you to criminal liability.

Is it legal to use a phone recording app in Michigan?

Using a recording app on your own phone to record calls you participate in is legal under the participant exception. However, if the phone is shared and the app automatically records all calls, it may capture conversations of others when you are not a participant, which would violate the eavesdropping statute.

Updates

Corrected a fabricated 2026 federal court ruling in AFT Michigan v. Project Veritas; the real case reached its participant-exception holding via a November 8, 2021 reconsideration order after an initial 2019 ruling the other way. Added a verified citation for Kearney v. Salomon Smith Barney and corrected the federal civil-damages citation from 18 U.S.C. 2511 (the criminal provision) to 18 U.S.C. 2520 (the civil-remedy provision).

Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources

Governing law re-checked for recent changes

Reviewed and approved by an editor

Sources and References

  1. Michigan Legislature - MCL 750.539c (Eavesdropping)(legislature.mi.gov).gov
  2. Michigan Legislature - MCL 750.539a (Definitions)(legislature.mi.gov).gov
  3. Michigan Legislature - MCL 750.539e (Divulging Information)(legislature.mi.gov).gov
  4. Michigan Legislature - MCL 750.539h (Civil Remedies)(legislature.mi.gov).gov
  5. Fisher v. Perron, 30 F.4th 289 (6th Cir. 2022)(law.justia.com)
  6. 18 U.S.C. Section 2511 - Federal Wiretap Act(law.cornell.edu)
  7. AFT Michigan v. Project Veritas, No. 4:17-cv-13292 (E.D. Mich., reconsideration order Nov. 8, 2021)(courtlistener.com).gov
  8. Kearney v. Salomon Smith Barney, Inc., 39 Cal. 4th 95 (2006)(courtlistener.com).gov
  9. 18 U.S.C. Section 2520 - Civil Action for Unauthorized Interception(law.cornell.edu).gov
Share: