New Hampshire
New Hampshire Video Recording Laws
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 22, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 22, 2026. · 10 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

In New Hampshire, silent video recording is generally legal in public because RSA 570-A only governs audio interception. Any video that also captures audio requires all-party consent under RSA 570-A:2. RSA 644:9 separately bars recording in private places such as bathrooms and bedrooms, regardless of whether audio is captured.
New Hampshire's approach to video recording is shaped by two separate areas of law. The state's wiretapping statute (RSA 570-A:2) governs the audio component of any video recording, while the voyeurism and privacy statutes (RSA 644:9 and RSA 644:9-a) address visual surveillance and image sharing. Understanding both frameworks is essential for anyone who records video in the Granite State.
This guide covers silent video recording, video with audio, surveillance cameras, privacy restrictions, criminal penalties, and your rights when recording in public spaces.
How New Hampshire Law Treats Video Recording
The Audio-Video Distinction
New Hampshire's wiretapping law under RSA Chapter 570-A specifically targets the interception of telecommunications, oral communications, and electronic communications. The statute does not directly prohibit silent visual recording. This creates an important distinction:
- Video without audio (silent surveillance footage): Not governed by RSA 570-A. This is generally legal in public and semi-public spaces, subject to privacy limitations.
- Video with audio (any recording that captures sound): Subject to the all-party consent requirement under RSA 570-A:2. Recording video that also picks up conversations requires consent from every person whose voice is captured.
This means the legality of any particular video recording often turns on a single question: does it capture audio of a private conversation?
Silent Video Recording Rules
Because RSA 570-A does not cover purely visual recording, silent video is generally permitted in New Hampshire when:
- You are recording in a public place where subjects have no reasonable expectation of visual privacy
- The recording does not capture any person in a private place as defined by RSA 644:9
- The recording is not made for the purpose of sexual gratification or to capture intimate body parts without consent
- The subjects are not in bathrooms, bedrooms, locker rooms, or changing areas
Common examples of legal silent video recording include security cameras in retail stores (with no audio), dashcams pointed at the road, and doorbell cameras capturing activity on a front porch.
Video With Audio Recording Rules
Any video recording that also captures audio in New Hampshire is subject to the full weight of the wiretapping statute. Under RSA 570-A:2:
- All-party consent is required before you may record video that captures private conversations
- Willful recording of audio without consent is a Class B felony (up to 7 years in prison, $4,000 fine)
- Knowing participant recording of audio without consent is a misdemeanor (up to 1 year in jail, $2,000 fine)
- Civil liability of $100 per day or $1,000 minimum applies under RSA 570-A:11
This has significant practical implications. A home security camera that records video and audio of visitors on a porch could create legal issues if it captures private conversations. A nanny cam with a microphone in a living room raises all-party consent concerns. Even a phone video of a conversation triggers the wiretapping statute because of the audio component.
Voyeurism and Visual Privacy Laws

RSA 644:9 Violation of Privacy
New Hampshire has robust visual privacy protections under RSA 644:9. This statute prohibits specific types of visual recording regardless of whether audio is captured:
Class A Misdemeanor offenses include:
- Installing or using any device to observe, photograph, or record a person's intimate body parts without their consent when they have a reasonable expectation of privacy
- Placing a camera or recording device in any private place such as a bathroom, bedroom, changing room, or locker room without the consent of the people using that space
The penalty for a Class A misdemeanor is up to 1 year in jail and a $2,000 fine under RSA 651:2.
Viewing another person without their knowledge or consent in a place where privacy is expected, for the purpose of sexual gratification, is also a misdemeanor under RSA 644:9, III-a, but the statute does not specify a class. Under RSA 625:9, it defaults to a Class B misdemeanor (no jail, up to a $1,200 fine) unless the State elects Class A treatment before arraignment or a violence element applies, raising the maximum to 1 year in jail and a $2,000 fine.
RSA 644:9-a Nonconsensual Intimate Images
New Hampshire's nonconsensual image sharing law under RSA 644:9-a addresses the distribution of private video and images. It is a Class B felony to:
- Share intimate or sexual images or video of another person without their consent when done with intent to harass, intimidate, threaten, or coerce
- Distribute synthetic or AI-generated video that manipulates a recognizable person's likeness into intimate content without their consent
- Threaten to share intimate images as a form of coercion or extortion
A Class B felony carries up to 7 years in state prison and a $4,000 fine under RSA 651:2. This law was strengthened to cover deepfake and AI-generated content, reflecting the growing threat of digitally manipulated intimate media.
Video Recording in Specific Locations

Public Spaces
Video recording in public spaces is generally legal in New Hampshire. The First Amendment protects the right to record in areas that are open to the public, including:
- Public sidewalks, parks, and streets
- Government buildings during public hours
- Public rallies, protests, and demonstrations
- Commercial areas like shopping centers and parking lots
Even in public spaces, the all-party consent rule applies to any audio captured by the recording. Silent video or video of events where no reasonable expectation of privacy exists for the audio component is typically permissible.
Private Property
On private property, the property owner sets the rules for video recording (subject to privacy laws):
- Property owners can install cameras on their own property
- Businesses may install video surveillance in common areas
- No cameras are permitted in bathrooms, changing rooms, or other private areas regardless of ownership
- Tenants have privacy rights that limit a landlord's ability to install cameras inside rental units
Government Meetings
The Right-to-Know Law (RSA 91-A:2, II) specifically authorizes the use of tape recorders, cameras, videotape equipment, and other recording devices at public meetings of government bodies. This applies to:
- State legislative sessions and committee hearings
- County commission meetings
- Municipal council, selectboard, and school board meetings
- Planning board and zoning board hearings
Government bodies cannot prohibit video recording at their public sessions. This is one of the clearest exceptions to the general consent requirements under New Hampshire law.
Home Video Surveillance

Rules for Homeowners
New Hampshire homeowners may install video surveillance systems on their property, but must observe these limitations:
- Exterior cameras pointed at your own yard, driveway, or front door are generally legal, including with audio, as long as they primarily capture activity on your own property
- Interior cameras should avoid capturing audio of conversations unless all occupants and visitors are informed and consent
- Cameras must never be placed in bathrooms, bedrooms, or other private rooms where guests or household members expect privacy (RSA 644:9)
- Audio-enabled cameras that pick up conversations between neighbors or passersby may violate RSA 570-A if those individuals have a reasonable expectation of privacy
Nanny Cams and Babysitter Monitoring
New Hampshire does not have a specific statute addressing nanny cameras. The general rules apply:
- Silent video nanny cams are likely legal in common areas of your home
- Audio-enabled nanny cams capture conversations and may trigger the all-party consent requirement under RSA 570-A:2
- Cameras in bathrooms or bedrooms are prohibited regardless of the purpose (RSA 644:9)
- The safest approach is to inform your babysitter or childcare provider about any cameras and obtain their consent, particularly for audio recording
Penalties for Illegal Video Recording
Criminal Penalties Summary
| Offense | Classification | Maximum Prison | Maximum Fine |
|---|---|---|---|
| Video with audio, willful interception (RSA 570-A:2, I) | Class B Felony | 7 years | $4,000 |
| Video with audio, knowing participant (RSA 570-A:2, I-a) | Misdemeanor | 1 year | $2,000 |
| Voyeurism / recording in private places (RSA 644:9) | Class A Misdemeanor | 1 year | $2,000 |
| Second or subsequent voyeurism offense (RSA 644:9, VI) | Class B Felony | 7 years | $4,000 |
| Voyeurism offense against a victim under 18 (RSA 644:9, VII) | Class B Felony (Class A felony if repeat) | up to 7 years (up to 15 years if repeat) | $4,000 |
| Nonconsensual intimate image sharing (RSA 644:9-a) | Class B Felony | 7 years | $4,000 |
Civil Liability
Victims of illegal video recording may pursue civil remedies through multiple avenues:
- RSA 570-A:11 provides liquidated damages of $100 per day or $1,000 minimum, plus punitive damages and attorney fees, for violations involving audio interception
- Common law privacy torts may provide additional remedies for intrusion upon seclusion or public disclosure of private facts
- RSA 644:9-a victims may pursue civil action for nonconsensual intimate image distribution
Using Video Recordings as Evidence
Admissibility Standards
Video recordings offered as evidence in New Hampshire courts must satisfy several requirements:
- Authentication: The proponent must establish that the recording is genuine, unaltered, and accurately depicts the events
- Relevance: The video must relate to a material issue in the case
- Legality of acquisition: Videos obtained through felony violations of RSA 570-A may be suppressed under RSA 570-A:6, though misdemeanor-level recordings may still be admissible following the State v. Clark (2024) ruling
- Balancing test: The court weighs the probative value against any unfair prejudicial effect
Best Practices for Video Evidence
To maximize the evidentiary value of your video recordings:
- Use a reliable recording device with accurate date and time stamps
- Do not edit or modify the original footage
- Preserve the original file in its native format
- Store backup copies in multiple secure locations
- Document the recording setup including camera placement and settings
- Maintain a chain of custody log showing who had access to the recording
Emerging Issues in Video Recording Law
Drones and Aerial Video
New Hampshire enacted RSA 207:57 regulating the use of drones. While primarily focused on use near wildlife, drone operators should be aware that:
- Aerial video of private property may raise privacy concerns under RSA 644:9
- Audio captured by drone microphones is subject to RSA 570-A consent requirements
- Federal Aviation Administration rules also govern drone operations
Ring Doorbells and Smart Cameras
Internet-connected doorbell cameras and smart home security systems that record audio create unique legal questions in New Hampshire. Because these devices often record audio continuously:
- The audio component may capture private conversations of visitors, delivery workers, and passersby
- Homeowners should consider disabling audio recording or posting visible notices about recording
- Sharing doorbell camera footage that includes private conversations could create civil liability
More New Hampshire Recording Laws
Audio Recording | Video Recording | Voyeurism | Workplace Recording | Recording Police | Phone Call Recording | Security Cameras | Recording in Public | Landlord-Tenant | Dashcam Laws | Schools | Medical Recording
Back to New Hampshire Recording Laws
More New Hampshire Recording Topics
More New Hampshire Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Is it legal to video record someone in New Hampshire without their knowledge?
It depends on the circumstances. Silent video recording in public places is generally legal. However, video that captures audio of private conversations requires all-party consent under RSA 570-A:2. Video recording in private places like bathrooms or bedrooms is prohibited under RSA 644:9 regardless of audio capture.
Can I install security cameras on my property in New Hampshire?
Yes. Homeowners may install security cameras on their own property. Cameras must never be placed in bathrooms, bedrooms, or other private areas where guests expect privacy. If cameras record audio, the all-party consent rule under RSA 570-A:2 may apply to captured conversations. Consider disabling audio or posting visible notices.
Is sharing intimate video without consent illegal in New Hampshire?
Yes. Under RSA 644:9-a, sharing intimate or sexual images or video of another person without their consent is a Class B felony when done with intent to harass, intimidate, or coerce. This carries up to 7 years in prison and a $4,000 fine. The law also covers AI-generated or digitally manipulated content.
Can I record video at a public meeting in New Hampshire?
Yes. The Right-to-Know Law (RSA 91-A:2, II) explicitly permits the use of cameras, videotape equipment, and other recording devices at public meetings of government bodies. State, county, and municipal bodies cannot prohibit video recording during public sessions.
What are the penalties for illegal video recording in New Hampshire?
Penalties vary by offense. Video with audio captured without consent can be a Class B felony (up to 7 years, $4,000 fine) or misdemeanor (up to 1 year, $2,000 fine) under RSA 570-A:2. Voyeurism under RSA 644:9 is a Class A misdemeanor (up to 1 year, $2,000 fine). Nonconsensual intimate image sharing under RSA 644:9-a is a Class B felony.
Updates
Fixed a repeated wrong-neighbor citation for the public-meeting recording right (RSA 91-A:2, II, not 91-A:2-a), added RSA 644:9's felony-escalation tiers to the voyeurism penalty table, and corrected the TAKE IT DOWN Act's signing date to May 19, 2025.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Fixed the Class A misdemeanor penalty citation (RSA 651:2, not RSA 625:9) and moved the unaided-eye viewing offense out of the 'Class A Misdemeanor' list since RSA 644:9, III-a is unclassified and defaults to Class B under RSA 625:9.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Propagated State v. Clark (2024 N.H. 64, Nov. 13, 2024) and State v. Hersom (No. 2023-0352, Jan. 24, 2025) two-tier suppression framework from parent hub; confirmed RSA 570-A:2, I-a misdemeanor framing; updated federal overlay (NLRB GC Memo 25-07, [TAKE IT DOWN Act](/us-laws/take-it-down-act) May 19 2025); RSA 105-D body cam reference added where applicable.
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
New Hampshire Revised Statutes Annotated, TITLE LXII CRIMINAL CODE, CHAPTER 644 BREACHES OF THE PEACE AND RELATED OFFENSES
§ 644:9Violation of Privacy.In forcecited in 12 of our articles
I. A person is guilty of a class A misdemeanor if such person unlawfully and without the consent of the persons entitled to privacy therein, installs or uses: (a) Any device for the purpose of observing, photographing, recording, amplifying, broadcasting, or in any way transmitting images or sounds of the private body parts of a person including the genitalia, buttocks, or female breasts, or a person's body underneath that person's clothing; or (b) In any private place, any device for the purpose of observing, photographing, recording, amplifying or broadcasting, or in any way transmitting images or sounds in such place; or (c) Outside a private place, any device for the purpose of hearing, recording, amplifying, broadcasting, observing, or in any way transmitting images, location, movement, or sounds originating in such place which would not ordinarily be audible, visible, or comprehensible outside such place. II.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at gc.nh.gov
Cited in 4 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2023
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. McLellan (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 1999, 144 N.H. 602)“…pposite. Finally, we reject the defendant’s argument that RSA 644:9 (1996) supports his claim that he had a…”
- State of New Hampshire v. Justin M. Lamontagne (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 2023)“…assault and a case involving dissemination of an image. See RSA 644:9- a, II(c). We fail to see such a distin…”
- State v. Richard Lucas (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 2018)“…(1) an intent to commit a violation of privacy pursuant to RSA 644:9, III-a or IV (2016) does not satisfy th…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: New Hampshire Landlord-Tenant Recording Laws, New Hampshire Medical Recording Laws, New Hampshire Laws on Recording in Public
New Hampshire Revised Statutes Annotated, TITLE LVIII PUBLIC JUSTICE, CHAPTER 570-A WIRETAPPING AND EAVESDROPPING
§ 570-A:11Recovery of Civil Damages Authorized.In forcecited in 14 of our articles
Any person whose telecommunication or oral communication is intercepted, disclosed, or used in violation of this chapter shall have a civil cause of action against any person who intercepts, discloses, or uses, or procures any other person to intercept, disclose or use such communications, and be entitled to recover from any such person: (a) actual damages but not less than liquidated damages computed at the rate of $100 a day for each day of violation or $1,000, whichever is higher; (b) punitive damages; and (c) a reasonable attorney's fee and other litigation costs reasonably incurred. Good faith reliance on a court order or on a representation made by the attorney general, deputy attorney general or a county attorney shall constitute a complete defense to any civil or criminal action brought under this chapter.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at gc.nh.gov
Cited in 6 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2021
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Courts have applied RSA 570-A:11 as the chapter's private damages remedy. Desilets v. Wal-Mart Stores (1997) awarded fees and costs under 570-A:11(c) after a jury found statutory damages for secret workplace recording; Lath v. Manchester PD, et al. (2017) entered judgment for the defendant where no interception was shown.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Karen Warrington, individually, and as m/n/f of J.W. v. P John Edward Warrington (District Court, D. New Hampshire 2021, 2021 DNH 070)✓A father secretly recorded a call with his son at a New Hampshire boarding school and later used it in divorce proceedings; the court dismissed the mother's 570-A:11 damages claim because the complaint never alleged he was in New Hampshire when he recorded.
- Sanjeev Lath v. Oak Brook Condominium Owners’ Association, Gerard Dufresne, and Betty Mullen (District Court, D. New Hampshire 2018, 2018 DNH 013)“…upport dogs. Count 9: an eavesdropping claim under RSA 570-A:11 against Mullen, for installing came…”
- Lath v. Manchester PD, et al. (District Court, D. New Hampshire 2017, 2017 DNH 164)✓A condominium owner claimed a neighbor drilled holes in their shared wall and installed listening devices in his unit; on her unrebutted affidavit denying it, the court granted summary judgment against his 570-A:11 eavesdropping claim.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: New Hampshire Audio Recording Laws, New Hampshire Dashcam Laws, New Hampshire Phone Call Recording Laws
§ 570-A:2Interception and Disclosure of Telecommunication or Oral Communications Prohibited.In forcecited in 23 of our articles
I. A person is guilty of a class B felony if, except as otherwise specifically provided in this chapter or without the consent of all parties to the communication, the person: (a) Wilfully intercepts, endeavors to intercept, or procures any other person to intercept or endeavor to intercept, any telecommunication or oral communication; (b) Wilfully uses, endeavors to use, or procures any other person to use or endeavor to use any electronic, mechanical, or other device to intercept any oral communication when: (1) Such device is affixed to, or otherwise transmits a signal through, a wire, cable, or other like connection used in telecommunication, or (2) Such device transmits communications by radio, or interferes with the transmission of such communication, or (3) Such use or endeavor to use (A) takes place on premises of any business or other commercial establishment, or (B) obtains or is for the purpose of obtaining information relating to the operations of any business or other commercial establishment; or (c) Wilfully discloses, or endeavors to disclose, to any other person the contents of any telecommunication or oral communication, knowing or having reason to know that…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at gc.nh.gov
Cited in 35 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):New Hampshire courts read the felony offense in RSA 570-A:2, I as requiring more than intent to record. Fischer v. Hooper (1999) held wilfully means intentional or reckless disregard for the lawfulness of the conduct, so a good faith belief is a defense. State of New Hampshire v. Adam Mueller (2014) reversed on that mens rea.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Kilgus (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 1986, 128 N.H. 577)✓A murder-for-hire middleman agreed to wear a hidden recorder and got the defendant to confirm paying $1,000 to have a man killed; the court held the taping was lawful under RSA 570-A:2, II(d) because one party consented and homicide is an enumerated offense.
- Fischer v. Hooper (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 1999, 143 N.H. 585)✓A father secretly taped his ex-wife's calls with their daughter though a guardian ad litem had said both parents must agree; the court held wilfully in RSA 570-A:2, I requires intentional or reckless disregard for the lawfulness of the conduct, and reversed for a new trial.
- State of New Hampshire v. Adam Mueller (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 2014, 166 N.H. 65)✓A police-accountability activist recorded three phone calls with a police captain and two school officials without telling them; the court held that instructing the jury on purposely rather than the statute's wilfully was plain error and reversed his wiretapping convictions.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: New Hampshire Security Camera Laws, New Hampshire Voyeurism Laws, New Hampshire Smart Glasses Recording Laws (2026)
§ 570-A:6Prohibition of Use as Evidence of Intercepted Telecommunications or Oral Communications.In forcecited in 7 of our articles
Whenever any telecommunication or oral communication has been intercepted, no part of the contents of such communication and no evidence derived therefrom may be received in evidence in any trial, hearing, or other proceeding in or before any court, grand jury, department, officer, agency, regulatory body, legislative committee, or other authority of the state, or a political subdivision thereof, if the disclosure of that information would be in violation of this chapter.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at gc.nh.gov
Cited in 16 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. McLeod (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 2013, 165 N.H. 42)“…dio-recording of a one-party telephonic interception, see RSA 570-A:6 (2001). We reverse in part, vacate in p…”
- State v. MacMillan (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 2005, 152 N.H. 67)“…sion of Detective Warchol’s testimony is not required under RSA 570-A:6 (2001) because the detective’s knowledg…”
- State v. Telles (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 1995, 139 N.H. 344)“…ions that she had overheard. The defendant objected, citing RSA 570-A:6, which prohibits the admission of evide…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: New Hampshire Recording Laws (2026): All-Party Consent Rules, New Hampshire Ring Doorbell Laws: What You Need to Know in 2026
New Hampshire Revised Statutes Annotated, TITLE LXII CRIMINAL CODE, CHAPTER 625 PRELIMINARY
§ 625:9Classification of Crimes.In forcecited in 13 of our articles
I. The provisions of this section govern the classification of every offense, whether defined within this code or by any other statute. II. Every offense is either a felony, misdemeanor or violation. (a) Felonies and misdemeanors are crimes. (b) A violation does not constitute a crime and conviction of a violation shall not give rise to any disability or legal disadvantage based on conviction of a criminal offense. III. A felony is murder or a crime so designated by statute within or outside this code or a crime defined by statute outside of this code where the maximum penalty provided is imprisonment in excess of one year; provided, however, that a crime defined by statute outside of this code is a felony when committed by a corporation or an unincorporated association if the maximum fine therein provided is more than $200. (a) Felonies other than murder are either class A felonies or class B felonies when committed by an individual. Felonies committed by a corporation or an unincorporated association are unclassified.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at gc.nh.gov
Cited in 65 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Samuel Pennock (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 2015, 168 N.H. 294)“…shall not include incarceration or probation”); see also RSA 625:9, IV(b) (2007) (defining a class B misde…”
- State v. Morrill (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 1983, 123 N.H. 707)“…ed the sum of $500. In 1971, the legislature enacted RSA 625:9, under which every offense defined with…”
- State v. Woods (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 1995, 139 N.H. 399)“…es that his violation is not a “criminal” act because under RSA 625:9, 11(b) (1986), a violation is not a “cr…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: New Hampshire Laws on Recording Police, New Hampshire School Recording Laws, New Hampshire AI Meeting Recording Laws (2026)
New Hampshire Revised Statutes Annotated, TITLE LXII CRIMINAL CODE, CHAPTER 651 SENTENCES
§ 651:2Sentences and Limitations.In forcecited in 14 of our articles
I. A person convicted of a felony or a Class A misdemeanor may be sentenced to imprisonment, probation, conditional or unconditional discharge, or a fine. II. If a sentence of imprisonment is imposed, the court shall fix the maximum thereof which is not to exceed: (a) Fifteen years for a class A felony, (b) Seven years for a class B felony, (c) One year for a class A misdemeanor, (d) Life imprisonment for murder in the second degree, and, in the case of a felony only, a minimum which is not to exceed 1/2 of the maximum, or if the maximum is life imprisonment, such minimum term as the court may order. II-a. A person convicted of murder in the first degree shall be sentenced as provided in RSA 630:1-a. II-b. A person convicted of a second or subsequent offense for the felonious use of a firearm, as provided in RSA 650-A:1, shall, in addition to any punishment provided for the underlying felony, be given a minimum mandatory sentence of 3 years imprisonment.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at gc.nh.gov
Cited in 147 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):State v. Russell (2009) found plain error where the jury was never asked whether the deadly weapon was a firearm, as RSA 651:2, II-g requires, but affirmed the extended term because that evidence was overwhelming. State v. Elbert (1984) held the minimum and maximum term rule of RSA 651:2, II applies only if a defendant is parole eligible.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Kousounadis (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 2009, 159 N.H. 413)“…rder, see RSA 173-B:9, III (2002). He was sentenced under RSA 651:2, II-g (2007). We affirm in part, revers…”
- State v. Russell (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 2009, 159 N.H. 475)✓A jury convicted Russell of armed robbery but was never instructed it had to find the deadly weapon was a firearm; the court called the resulting RSA 651:2, II-g enhanced sentence plain error yet declined to disturb it given overwhelming, undisputed firearm evidence.
- Duquette v. Warden, New Hampshire State Prison (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 2007, 154 N.H. 737)✓A prisoner serving consecutive sexual assault terms argued no statute allowed them; the court found RSA 651:2 silent on consecutive sentences except its firearm provision in II-b, but held trial courts retain common law authority to impose them and rejected a vagueness challenge.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: New Hampshire Workplace Recording Laws, New Hampshire Surveillance Camera Laws (2026 Guide)
Explore the law
This article also draws on these acts and chapters (opening at their first section): New Hampshire Revised Statutes Annotated, TITLE LVIII PUBLIC JUSTICE, CHAPTER 570-A WIRETAPPING AND EAVESDROPPING § 570-A:1 (Definitions.)
Related law for further reading — not part of this article’s citations.
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- RSA 570-A:2 - Interception and Disclosure Prohibited(gc.nh.gov).gov
- RSA 644:9 - Violation of Privacy(gc.nh.gov).gov
- RSA 644:9-a - Nonconsensual Intimate Images(gc.nh.gov).gov
- RSA 91-A - Right-to-Know Law(gc.nh.gov).gov
- RSA 570-A:11 - Civil Damages(gencourt.state.nh.us).gov
- RSA 625:9 - Classification of Crimes(gc.nh.gov).gov
- RSA 651:2 - Sentences and Limitations(gc.nh.gov).gov
- State v. Clark, 2024 N.H. 64(courts.nh.gov).gov
- RSA Chapter 570-A - Wiretapping and Eavesdropping (Full Chapter)(gc.nh.gov).gov
- RSA 570-A:6 - Prohibition of Use as Evidence(gencourt.state.nh.us).gov