EnglishEspañol
New Hampshire flag

New Hampshire

New Hampshire Phone Call Recording Laws

Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 22, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 22, 2026. · 10 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

New Hampshire Phone Call Recording Laws

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I record a phone call in New Hampshire without telling the other person?

No. New Hampshire is an all-party consent state under RSA 570-A:2. You must inform every person on the call and obtain their consent before recording. Recording without consent is a misdemeanor for participants and a potential Class B felony, with civil damages of at least $1,000.

What happens if I record a call with someone in another state?

When calling across state lines, the stricter recording law typically applies. Because New Hampshire requires all-party consent, you must follow that standard regardless of the other state's law. If the other state also requires all-party consent (like Massachusetts), both laws reinforce the same requirement.

Can a business record my phone call in New Hampshire?

Only with your consent. Businesses must provide clear notification that the call may be recorded and give you the opportunity to decline. Simply playing a recording announcement is not enough if you are not given a chance to opt out. Employees whose calls are monitored must also consent through written agreements.

Is it legal to record a Zoom or Teams call in New Hampshire?

Only with all-party consent. The platform notification that recording has started is not sufficient consent under New Hampshire law. Every participant must affirmatively agree to the recording before it begins. Participants who join after recording started must also consent for their portion.

Can police record my phone calls without my knowledge in New Hampshire?

Only under narrow conditions. Law enforcement may record calls with one-party consent under RSA 570-A:2, II(d), but only when investigating specific crimes like organized crime or harassing telephone calls, and only with authorization from the Attorney General. For other investigations, a wiretap warrant is required.

Updates

Corrected the neighboring-state comparison table: Vermont has no wiretapping statute (its one-party default comes from case law and the federal floor), replacing a fabricated statute citation. Also fixed the TAKE IT DOWN Act's signing date to May 19, 2025.

Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes

Corrected the participant phone-call recording misdemeanor to state RSA 625:9's Class-B-by-default rule (no jail, up to $1,200) instead of presenting the Class A figures (1 year, $2,000) as the flat maximum.

Governing law re-checked for recent changes

Governing law re-checked for recent changes

Propagated State v. Clark (2024 N.H. 64, Nov. 13, 2024) and State v. Hersom (No. 2023-0352, Jan. 24, 2025) two-tier suppression framework from parent hub; confirmed RSA 570-A:2, I-a misdemeanor framing; updated federal overlay (NLRB GC Memo 25-07, [TAKE IT DOWN Act](/us-laws/take-it-down-act) May 19 2025); RSA 105-D body cam reference added where applicable.

Reviewed and approved by an editor

Sources and References

  1. RSA 570-A:2 - Interception Prohibited(gc.nh.gov).gov
  2. RSA 570-A:1 - Definitions(gc.nh.gov).gov
  3. RSA 570-A:11 - Civil Damages(gencourt.state.nh.us).gov
  4. RSA 570-A:6 - Evidence Suppression(gencourt.state.nh.us).gov
  5. RSA 651:2 - Sentences(gc.nh.gov).gov
  6. FCC Recording Guide(fcc.gov).gov
  7. State v. Clark 2024(courts.nh.gov).gov
  8. State v. Hersom 2025(courts.nh.gov).gov
  9. RSA Chapter 570-A - Wiretapping and Eavesdropping (Full Chapter)(gc.nh.gov).gov
  10. RSA 625:9 - Classification of Crimes(gc.nh.gov).gov
Share: