New Hampshire Voyeurism Laws

New Hampshire criminalizes voyeurism under RSA 644:9, making it a Class A misdemeanor to observe or record a person in a private place without consent. The law covers hidden cameras in bathrooms, locker rooms, and bedrooms, as well as recording intimate body parts without consent in any setting.

New Hampshire takes voyeurism and visual privacy violations seriously, with criminal statutes that address unauthorized observation, hidden cameras in private places, and the nonconsensual sharing of intimate images. The state's primary voyeurism law is RSA 644:9, which criminalizes invasion of privacy through observation and recording. A companion statute, RSA 644:9-a, addresses the distribution of intimate images without consent, including digitally manipulated or AI-generated content.

This guide explains what New Hampshire law prohibits, the penalties for violations, how these laws interact with the state's wiretapping statute, and what to do if you are a victim.

Understanding RSA 644:9 Violation of Privacy

What the Law Prohibits

RSA 644:9 establishes several categories of prohibited conduct related to visual privacy:

Paragraph III-a: Unauthorized observation. A person is guilty of a misdemeanor when they knowingly view another person, without that person's knowledge or consent, in a place where the person has a reasonable expectation of privacy, for the purpose of sexual arousal or gratification. RSA 644:9, III-a does not specify a misdemeanor class, so under RSA 625:9 it defaults to a Class B misdemeanor (no jail, up to a $1,200 fine) unless the State elects Class A treatment before arraignment or a violence element applies.

Paragraph I(b): Recording devices in private places. It is a Class A misdemeanor to install or use any device to observe, photograph, film, or record any person in a private place without that person's consent. Private places specifically include:

• Bathrooms and restrooms
• Locker rooms and shower areas
• Changing rooms and dressing rooms
• Bedrooms and hotel rooms
• Any location where a person would reasonably expect complete privacy from visual observation

Paragraph I(a): Recording intimate body parts. It is a Class A misdemeanor to use any device to photograph, record, or film the intimate body parts of another person without that person's consent when the person has a reasonable expectation of privacy regarding those body parts. This covers "upskirting," hidden cameras aimed at body parts, and similar conduct.

What Constitutes a "Private Place"

New Hampshire courts evaluate whether a location qualifies as a private place based on several factors:

• Physical enclosure: Bathrooms, individual changing stalls, and hotel rooms are clearly private places
• Purpose of the space: Areas designed for undressing, bathing, or intimate activities carry strong privacy expectations
• Access restrictions: Spaces that are locked, enclosed, or restricted to certain individuals are more likely private places
• Reasonable expectations: The analysis focuses on whether a reasonable person would expect to be free from observation in that location

A private home's bathroom is always a private place. A shared office with glass walls is generally not. The key inquiry is what a reasonable person in that location would expect regarding visual privacy.

How Voyeurism Differs From Wiretapping

New Hampshire maintains two separate legal frameworks for recording-related offenses:

When a hidden camera captures both video and audio, both statutes may apply simultaneously. A person who places a camera with a microphone in a bathroom could face voyeurism charges under RSA 644:9 and wiretapping charges under RSA 570-A:2, with the penalties stacking.

Nonconsensual Intimate Images Under RSA 644:9-a

What the Law Covers

RSA 644:9-a addresses the distribution, publication, or sharing of intimate images without the depicted person's consent. This statute was enacted to combat "revenge porn" and has been updated to address emerging technologies. It covers:

• Photographs and videos depicting a person in a state of nudity or engaged in sexual activity
• Images originally shared in confidence that are later distributed without consent
• AI-generated or digitally manipulated images (deepfakes) that place a recognizable person's likeness in intimate or sexual content without their permission
• Threats to distribute intimate images as a means of harassment, intimidation, or coercion

Elements of the Offense

To establish a violation of RSA 644:9-a, the prosecution must prove:

1. The defendant disseminated, published, or otherwise distributed an intimate image
2. The image depicts a recognizable person in a state of nudity or engaged in sexual conduct
3. The depicted person did not consent to the distribution
4. The defendant acted with intent to harass, intimidate, threaten, or coerce the depicted person

The statute applies regardless of how the image was originally obtained. Even images that were shared consensually between intimate partners become subject to the law if later distributed without consent.

AI-Generated and Digitally Manipulated Content

New Hampshire's nonconsensual image law is notable for its coverage of synthetic media. This includes:

• Deepfake videos that superimpose a person's face onto intimate content
• AI-generated images that create realistic but fabricated intimate depictions of a real person
• Digitally altered photographs that manipulate a person's image into sexual or nude content

The key element is that the content depicts a recognizable person in a way that a reasonable observer would believe shows that person in an intimate context. The law does not require that the underlying image be authentic, only that the depicted person is identifiable.

Federal TAKE IT DOWN Act (May 19, 2025): The federal TAKE IT DOWN Act, signed into law on May 19, 2025, requires online platforms to remove nonconsensual intimate images, including AI-generated deepfakes, within 48 hours of a verified request. That platform-compliance obligation took effect one year later, on May 19, 2026. The Act applies nationwide and creates a federal floor for platform removal obligations that operates alongside New Hampshire's RSA 644:9-a criminal and civil liability framework. RSA 644:9-a addresses criminal and civil liability for creators and distributors; the TAKE IT DOWN Act addresses removal obligations for hosting platforms. Both can apply to the same incident.

Criminal Penalties

Voyeurism Penalties (RSA 644:9)

Under RSA 625:9, a Class A misdemeanor is the most serious misdemeanor classification in New Hampshire, but RSA 644:9's own penalty ladder escalates further: a second or subsequent conviction under paragraphs I through III-a is a Class B felony, and any violation involving a victim under 18 is a Class B felony on the first offense, rising to a Class A felony for a second or subsequent offense against a minor.

Nonconsensual Image Distribution Penalties (RSA 644:9-a)

2024-2025 Court Rulings: In State v. Clark, 2024 N.H. 64 (N.H. Nov. 13, 2024), the New Hampshire Supreme Court held that the suppression remedy under RSA 570-A:6 applies only to felony violations of RSA 570-A:2, I, not to misdemeanor participant recordings under RSA 570-A:2, I-a. In State v. Hersom, No. 2023-0352 (N.H. Jan. 24, 2025), the court held that the State must prove NH jurisdiction and willful mental state before the suppression framework applies. Note that RSA 570-A applies when voyeuristic recording also captures audio; RSA 644:9 governs visual-only voyeurism and is unaffected by the Clark/Hersom suppression framework.

A Class B felony conviction creates a permanent criminal record and carries collateral consequences including potential loss of employment, professional licensing issues, and restrictions on firearm ownership under RSA 159:3 and federal law (18 U.S.C. § 922(g)).

Combined Penalties When Audio Is Captured

If a voyeuristic recording also captures audio of private conversations, additional charges under RSA 570-A:2 may apply:

• Willful audio interception: Class B felony (up to 7 years, $4,000 fine)
• Knowing participant audio recording: Misdemeanor (up to 1 year, $2,000 fine)

A person convicted of both voyeurism and wiretapping could face consecutive sentences, significantly increasing the total potential prison time and fines.

Civil Remedies for Victims

Wiretapping Civil Damages (RSA 570-A:11)

When a voyeuristic recording includes audio, victims may sue under RSA 570-A:11 for:

• Liquidated damages of $100 per day of violation or $1,000, whichever is greater
• Actual damages if they exceed the liquidated minimum
• Punitive damages for particularly egregious conduct
• Attorney fees and litigation costs

Common Law Privacy Claims

Voyeurism victims may also bring civil claims based on common law privacy torts, including:

• Intrusion upon seclusion: An intentional intrusion into a person's private affairs that would be highly offensive to a reasonable person
• Public disclosure of private facts: Publicizing private information that would be highly offensive and is not of legitimate public concern
• Intentional infliction of emotional distress: Extreme and outrageous conduct that causes severe emotional harm

Protective Orders

Victims of voyeurism or nonconsensual image sharing may seek protective orders through New Hampshire courts. A protective order can require the offender to:

• Stop all surveillance or recording activity
• Delete or destroy all illicitly obtained images or recordings
• Cease distribution of any intimate images
• Stay away from the victim
• Have no contact with the victim

Specific Voyeurism Scenarios

Hidden Cameras in Rental Properties

Landlords and property owners who install hidden cameras in rental units face serious criminal liability. Cameras in bathrooms, bedrooms, or any area where tenants expect privacy violate RSA 644:9. Tenants who discover hidden cameras should:

1. Do not disturb the device if possible
2. Document the camera's location with photographs
3. Contact local law enforcement to file a criminal complaint
4. Consult an attorney about civil remedies including damages and lease termination

Peeping Tom Conduct

Traditional "peeping tom" behavior, such as looking through windows into a private home, falls under RSA 644:9 when the observation is of a person in a private place without their knowledge or consent. This applies even without any recording device. The act of observation alone can be criminal.

Upskirting and Hidden Body Cameras

Using cameras or phone cameras to photograph or record under a person's clothing without consent is specifically covered by RSA 644:9, I(a). This applies in any location, including public places. The reasonable expectation of privacy regarding intimate body parts exists even in otherwise public settings.

Workplace Voyeurism

Employers or coworkers who install cameras in workplace bathrooms, changing areas, or private offices may face voyeurism charges. The workplace context does not reduce the privacy expectations in genuinely private areas. Additionally, if audio is captured, wiretapping charges under RSA 570-A:2 may apply.

Reporting Voyeurism in New Hampshire

How to Report

If you are a victim of voyeurism or discover hidden recording devices:

• Call 911 if you feel you are in immediate danger
• Contact your local police department to file a criminal complaint
• Preserve any evidence you have, including photographs of camera locations
• Do not confront the suspected offender directly
• Seek legal counsel to understand your civil remedies

Statute of Limitations

New Hampshire's statute of limitations for criminal prosecution varies by offense classification. For misdemeanors, the general statute of limitations is one year from the date of the offense. For felonies under RSA 644:9-a, the statute of limitations is six years. Victims should report incidents promptly to preserve their legal options.

Victim Support Resources

The New Hampshire Attorney General's Office maintains a victim-witness assistance program. The New Hampshire Coalition Against Domestic and Sexual Violence provides support services for victims of sexual violations, including voyeurism and nonconsensual image sharing.

Defenses to Voyeurism Charges

Common Defenses

Defendants in New Hampshire voyeurism cases may raise several defenses:

• Consent: The observed or recorded person gave their consent to the observation or recording
• No reasonable expectation of privacy: The location was not a "private place" under the statute, or the observed person was in a public area
• Lack of knowledge: The defendant did not know the recording device was present or operational
• Legitimate purpose: The recording was made for a legitimate security or safety purpose in a location where it was lawfully permitted

Consent Issues

Consent must be informed and voluntary. Consent to be photographed in one context (such as a social gathering) does not extend to intimate recording. Consent given under coercion, threats, or deception is not valid consent under the law.

More New Hampshire Recording Laws

Audio Recording | Video Recording | Voyeurism | Workplace Recording | Recording Police | Phone Call Recording | Security Cameras | Recording in Public | Landlord-Tenant | Dashcam Laws | Schools | Medical Recording

Back to New Hampshire Recording Laws

More New Hampshire Recording Topics

• New Hampshire Biometric Privacy Laws
• Surveillance Camera Laws

More New Hampshire Laws

• New Hampshire AI Meeting Recording Laws
• New Hampshire Dashcam Laws
• New Hampshire Data Privacy Laws
• New Hampshire Deepfake Laws
• New Hampshire Employee Monitoring Laws
• New Hampshire GPS Tracking Laws
• New Hampshire Police Bodycam Laws
• New Hampshire Smart Glasses Recording Laws