New Hampshire
New Hampshire Laws on Recording in Public
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 22, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 22, 2026. · 8 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Silent video and photography in public spaces in New Hampshire are legal under the First Amendment, but audio recording of conversations where speakers retain a reasonable expectation of privacy still requires all-party consent under RSA 570-A:2.
Recording in public in New Hampshire involves a balance between the state's strict all-party consent wiretapping law and the constitutional right to observe and document public events. While New Hampshire generally requires consent from all parties before recording a conversation, activities in public spaces receive significant protection under both the First Amendment and state law.
This guide explains when you can legally record in public, the distinction between audio and visual recording, your rights at government meetings and public events, restrictions that apply even in public settings, and how to handle common situations.
The Public Recording Framework in New Hampshire
General Principles
New Hampshire law does not prohibit visual observation or silent video recording of events in public spaces. The legal restrictions center primarily on **audio recording of private conversations**. The framework works as follows:
- Silent video recording in public is generally legal because no oral communication is intercepted
- Audio recording is subject to the all-party consent requirement under RSA 570-A:2, but only when the recorded conversation qualifies as a protected "oral communication"
- An "oral communication" under RSA 570-A:1 requires a reasonable expectation of privacy by the speaker
- Speakers in public spaces often have a diminished or no expectation of privacy, meaning their statements may not qualify as protected oral communications
This creates a practical result: recording audio in public is more likely to be legal than recording audio in private, because the expectation of privacy is the determining factor.
When Is There No Reasonable Expectation of Privacy?
Courts consider several factors when determining whether a speaker in a public place has a reasonable expectation of privacy:
- Location: A conversation on a busy public sidewalk or in a crowded park carries little to no expectation of privacy
- Volume: Speaking at normal or loud volume in a public area suggests no privacy expectation
- Audience: Conversations held in front of strangers or in open public forums are not private
- Subject matter context: Speeches at rallies, statements at public meetings, and arguments on the street are typically not private communications
Conversations that do retain a reasonable expectation of privacy even in public settings:
- Whispered conversations in a secluded corner of a park
- Phone calls conducted on a public bench at low volume
- Private discussions at a restaurant table where speakers have taken steps to avoid being overheard
The line is not always clear, and close cases may require legal analysis based on the specific facts.
Recording at Government Meetings

Right-to-Know Law (RSA 91-A)
New Hampshire's Right-to-Know Law provides one of the clearest and strongest protections for public recording in the state. Under RSA 91-A:2, II:
- Any person may use tape recorders, cameras, videotape equipment, and other recording devices at public meetings
- Government bodies cannot prohibit the use of recording devices at public sessions
- This applies to meetings of all public bodies at the state, county, and municipal level
Government bodies covered by this provision include:
- State legislative sessions and committee hearings
- The Governor's Executive Council
- County commission and delegation meetings
- Municipal selectboard, city council, and town council meetings
- School board meetings
- Planning boards, zoning boards, and conservation commissions
- Police commissions and fire commissions
- Any other body that meets the definition of a "public body" under RSA 91-A:1-a
The New Hampshire Attorney General and the Governor's Office have both published guidance confirming the public's right to record at government meetings.
Nonpublic Sessions
While public sessions are open to recording, government bodies may enter nonpublic sessions under RSA 91-A:3 to discuss certain confidential matters such as personnel issues, legal strategy, or matters that could adversely affect the reputation of a non-public person. Recording is not permitted during nonpublic sessions unless the body specifically allows it.
Town Meetings
New Hampshire's unique tradition of town meetings (governed by RSA 39) is subject to the same Right-to-Know recording protections. Citizens may record town meeting proceedings, including debates, votes, and presentations.
First Amendment Protections for Public Recording

Constitutional Right to Record
The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution protects the right to record events in public spaces. The First Circuit Court of Appeals, which has jurisdiction over New Hampshire, confirmed in Glik v. Cunniffe (2011) that citizens have a right to film government officials, including police, performing their duties in public.
This protection extends to:
- Recording police activity in public (traffic stops, arrests, patrols)
- Recording public protests and demonstrations
- Recording public speeches and rallies
- Filming public buildings and infrastructure from public property
- Photographing or recording events visible from public spaces
Limitations on First Amendment Recording
The First Amendment right to record is not absolute. It may be lawfully restricted when:
- The recording interferes with government operations or obstructs public safety
- You are on private property and the owner directs you to stop recording or leave
- A court has issued a specific order restricting recording
- The recording involves areas with heightened security such as military installations or certain courtroom proceedings
- You are in a restricted area where access is controlled for safety reasons
Recording in Specific Public Locations

Sidewalks, Parks, and Streets
Recording on public sidewalks, in public parks, and on public streets is broadly protected:
- Silent video is legal without restriction
- Audio recording is generally legal when the speakers have no reasonable expectation of privacy (e.g., public speeches, loud conversations, street performers)
- Photography of people in public places is legal (there is no expectation of privacy regarding your appearance in a public setting)
- Interference restrictions may apply near police activity, accident scenes, or emergency operations
Retail Stores and Restaurants
Private businesses open to the public may set their own recording rules:
- Store owners can prohibit recording on their premises and ask you to stop or leave
- Refusing to stop recording when asked by the property owner may result in a trespassing charge
- Public sidewalks adjacent to businesses remain public spaces where recording is protected
- Audio recording inside a business is subject to RSA 570-A:2 if it captures private conversations
Shopping Malls and Private Plazas
Shopping malls and similar private property open to the public present a middle ground:
- The property owner sets the rules for recording on their premises
- Mall security can ask you to stop recording or to leave
- Continuing to record after being asked to stop may result in a trespassing charge
- Silent video of your own interactions (such as recording a customer service encounter) may be treated differently than filming other shoppers
Transportation Hubs
Recording at transportation facilities in New Hampshire:
- Public bus stops, train stations, and airports are generally public spaces where recording is permitted
- TSA screening areas at airports have specific federal restrictions on recording
- Inside public transit vehicles may involve expectations of privacy for quiet conversations between passengers
- Commercial airport terminals are public areas where silent video recording is typically permitted
Recording Protests and Demonstrations
Your Rights at Protests
Recording at public protests and demonstrations receives strong First Amendment protection in New Hampshire:
- You may record protest activity from any public space including sidewalks, parks, and public plazas
- You may record police response to protests from a safe distance
- You may record counter-protests and public confrontations
- Government officials cannot order the mass confiscation of phones or cameras from people recording a protest
Practical Tips for Recording at Protests
- Stay on public property such as sidewalks and public parks
- Maintain a safe distance from confrontations and police activity
- Do not interfere with police operations or crowd control measures
- Back up your footage to cloud storage in real time if possible
- Know your rights but be prepared to comply with lawful orders and challenge them afterward
Drone Recording in Public Spaces
State Drone Regulations
New Hampshire enacted RSA 207:57 addressing drone use in relation to wildlife, and general privacy laws apply to drone recording:
- Drone video of public spaces is generally legal from permissible altitudes
- Drone video that captures private property details (backyard, windows, etc.) may raise privacy concerns under RSA 644:9
- Audio captured by drone microphones is subject to RSA 570-A:2 consent requirements
- Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) rules govern where and how drones may be operated
Municipal Drone Restrictions
Some New Hampshire municipalities may have local ordinances restricting drone use in certain areas such as parks, beaches, or near schools. Check local regulations before operating a drone for recording purposes.
Penalties for Illegal Public Recording
2024-2025 Court Rulings: In State v. Clark, 2024 N.H. 64 (N.H. Nov. 13, 2024), the New Hampshire Supreme Court held that the suppression remedy under RSA 570-A:6 applies only to felony violations of RSA 570-A:2, I, not to misdemeanor participant recordings under RSA 570-A:2, I-a. In State v. Hersom, No. 2023-0352 (N.H. Jan. 24, 2025), the court held that the State must prove NH jurisdiction and willful mental state before the suppression framework applies.
While most public recording is legal, violations can occur when audio is captured without consent or when recording takes place in restricted areas:
| Offense | Classification | Maximum Penalty |
|---|---|---|
| Audio recording with expectation of privacy (RSA 570-A:2, I) | Class B Felony | 7 years, $4,000 |
| Participant recording without consent (RSA 570-A:2, I-a) | Misdemeanor (Class B by default) | No jail, up to $1,200 fine (Class B); up to 1 year, $2,000 fine if the State elects Class A |
| Recording intimate body parts in public (RSA 644:9) | Class A Misdemeanor | 1 year, $2,000 |
| Trespassing after being asked to leave (RSA 635:2) | Misdemeanor | 1 year, $2,000 |
More New Hampshire Recording Laws
Audio Recording | Video Recording | Voyeurism | Workplace Recording | Recording Police | Phone Call Recording | Security Cameras | Recording in Public | Landlord-Tenant | Dashcam Laws | Schools | Medical Recording
Back to New Hampshire Recording Laws
More New Hampshire Recording Topics
More New Hampshire Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Is it legal to record video in public in New Hampshire?
Yes. Silent video recording in public places is generally legal in New Hampshire. The First Amendment protects your right to record events in public spaces. Restrictions apply when recording captures audio of private conversations (RSA 570-A:2), is done on private property against the owner's wishes, or captures intimate body parts without consent (RSA 644:9).
Can I record a town meeting or school board meeting in New Hampshire?
Yes. New Hampshire's Right-to-Know Law (RSA 91-A:2, II) explicitly permits the use of tape recorders, cameras, videotape equipment, and other recording devices at public meetings. Government bodies cannot prohibit recording during public sessions. This applies to all state, county, and municipal public body meetings.
Can a store owner tell me to stop recording in New Hampshire?
Yes. Private business owners can set their own rules about recording on their premises. If a store owner asks you to stop recording and you refuse, you may be asked to leave. Continuing to remain on the property after being told to leave could result in a trespassing charge. Public sidewalks outside the business remain public recording spaces.
Can I record audio of a conversation on a public sidewalk in New Hampshire?
It depends on whether the speakers have a reasonable expectation of privacy. Loud conversations, public speeches, and street performances generally carry no privacy expectation and can be recorded. Quiet, private conversations between individuals, even on a public sidewalk, may still be protected under RSA 570-A:2 if the speakers took steps to ensure privacy.
Is it legal to fly a drone and record video in New Hampshire?
Drone video recording of public spaces is generally legal, subject to FAA regulations and state law. Drone footage that captures private property details may raise privacy concerns under RSA 644:9. Audio captured by drone microphones is subject to RSA 570-A:2 all-party consent requirements. Check local municipal ordinances for additional restrictions.
Updates
Fixed a repeated wrong-neighbor citation for the public-meeting recording right (RSA 91-A:2, II, not 91-A:2-a) and corrected the TAKE IT DOWN Act's signing date to May 19, 2025.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected the participant-recording misdemeanor row to reflect RSA 625:9's Class-B-by-default rule (no jail, up to $1,200) instead of stating the Class A figures (1 year, $2,000) as a flat maximum.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Propagated State v. Clark (2024 N.H. 64, Nov. 13, 2024) and State v. Hersom (No. 2023-0352, Jan. 24, 2025) two-tier suppression framework from parent hub; confirmed RSA 570-A:2, I-a misdemeanor framing; updated federal overlay (NLRB GC Memo 25-07, [TAKE IT DOWN Act](/us-laws/take-it-down-act) May 19 2025); RSA 105-D body cam reference added where applicable.
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
New Hampshire Revised Statutes Annotated, TITLE LVIII PUBLIC JUSTICE, CHAPTER 570-A WIRETAPPING AND EAVESDROPPING
§ 570-A:2Interception and Disclosure of Telecommunication or Oral Communications Prohibited.In forcecited in 23 of our articles
I. A person is guilty of a class B felony if, except as otherwise specifically provided in this chapter or without the consent of all parties to the communication, the person: (a) Wilfully intercepts, endeavors to intercept, or procures any other person to intercept or endeavor to intercept, any telecommunication or oral communication; (b) Wilfully uses, endeavors to use, or procures any other person to use or endeavor to use any electronic, mechanical, or other device to intercept any oral communication when: (1) Such device is affixed to, or otherwise transmits a signal through, a wire, cable, or other like connection used in telecommunication, or (2) Such device transmits communications by radio, or interferes with the transmission of such communication, or (3) Such use or endeavor to use (A) takes place on premises of any business or other commercial establishment, or (B) obtains or is for the purpose of obtaining information relating to the operations of any business or other commercial establishment; or (c) Wilfully discloses, or endeavors to disclose, to any other person the contents of any telecommunication or oral communication, knowing or having reason to know that…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at gc.nh.gov
Cited in 35 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):New Hampshire courts read the felony offense in RSA 570-A:2, I as requiring more than intent to record. Fischer v. Hooper (1999) held wilfully means intentional or reckless disregard for the lawfulness of the conduct, so a good faith belief is a defense. State of New Hampshire v. Adam Mueller (2014) reversed on that mens rea.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Kilgus (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 1986, 128 N.H. 577)✓A murder-for-hire middleman agreed to wear a hidden recorder and got the defendant to confirm paying $1,000 to have a man killed; the court held the taping was lawful under RSA 570-A:2, II(d) because one party consented and homicide is an enumerated offense.
- Fischer v. Hooper (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 1999, 143 N.H. 585)✓A father secretly taped his ex-wife's calls with their daughter though a guardian ad litem had said both parents must agree; the court held wilfully in RSA 570-A:2, I requires intentional or reckless disregard for the lawfulness of the conduct, and reversed for a new trial.
- State of New Hampshire v. Adam Mueller (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 2014, 166 N.H. 65)✓A police-accountability activist recorded three phone calls with a police captain and two school officials without telling them; the court held that instructing the jury on purposely rather than the statute's wilfully was plain error and reversed his wiretapping convictions.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: New Hampshire Security Camera Laws, New Hampshire Video Recording Laws, New Hampshire Voyeurism Laws
§ 570-A:1Definitions.In forcecited in 11 of our articles
As used in this chapter: I. "Telecommunication" means the transfer of any form of information in whole or in part through the facilities of a communications common carrier. "Telecommunication" does not include any communication made through a tone-only paging system or from a tracking device. II. "Oral communication" means any verbal communication uttered by a person who has a reasonable expectation that the communication is not subject to interception, under circumstances justifying such expectation. III. "Intercept" means the aural or other acquisition of, or the recording of, the contents of any telecommunication or oral communication through the use of any electronic, mechanical, or other device. IV.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at gc.nh.gov
Cited in 12 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Lamontagne (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 1992, 136 N.H. 575)“…State contends that there was no “intercept” as defined by RSA 570-A:1, III (1986 & Supp. 1992), while the def…”
- State v. Lott (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 2005, 152 N.H. 436)“…g.” State v. Townsend, 57 P.3d 255, 260 n.2 (Wash. 2002). RSA 570-A:1, IV states that an intercept is the rec…”
- State v. MacMillan (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 2005, 152 N.H. 67)“…rial court’s ruling that the interception was illegal under RSA 570-A:1 (2001), the only issue before us is whe…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: New Hampshire Audio Recording Laws, New Hampshire Dashcam Laws, New Hampshire Phone Call Recording Laws
New Hampshire Revised Statutes Annotated, TITLE LXII CRIMINAL CODE, CHAPTER 625 PRELIMINARY
§ 625:9Classification of Crimes.In forcecited in 13 of our articles
I. The provisions of this section govern the classification of every offense, whether defined within this code or by any other statute. II. Every offense is either a felony, misdemeanor or violation. (a) Felonies and misdemeanors are crimes. (b) A violation does not constitute a crime and conviction of a violation shall not give rise to any disability or legal disadvantage based on conviction of a criminal offense. III. A felony is murder or a crime so designated by statute within or outside this code or a crime defined by statute outside of this code where the maximum penalty provided is imprisonment in excess of one year; provided, however, that a crime defined by statute outside of this code is a felony when committed by a corporation or an unincorporated association if the maximum fine therein provided is more than $200. (a) Felonies other than murder are either class A felonies or class B felonies when committed by an individual. Felonies committed by a corporation or an unincorporated association are unclassified.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at gc.nh.gov
Cited in 65 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Samuel Pennock (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 2015, 168 N.H. 294)“…shall not include incarceration or probation”); see also RSA 625:9, IV(b) (2007) (defining a class B misde…”
- State v. Morrill (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 1983, 123 N.H. 707)“…ed the sum of $500. In 1971, the legislature enacted RSA 625:9, under which every offense defined with…”
- State v. Woods (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 1995, 139 N.H. 399)“…es that his violation is not a “criminal” act because under RSA 625:9, 11(b) (1986), a violation is not a “cr…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: New Hampshire Landlord-Tenant Recording Laws, New Hampshire Medical Recording Laws, New Hampshire Laws on Recording Police
New Hampshire Revised Statutes Annotated, TITLE LXII CRIMINAL CODE, CHAPTER 644 BREACHES OF THE PEACE AND RELATED OFFENSES
§ 644:9Violation of Privacy.In forcecited in 12 of our articles
I. A person is guilty of a class A misdemeanor if such person unlawfully and without the consent of the persons entitled to privacy therein, installs or uses: (a) Any device for the purpose of observing, photographing, recording, amplifying, broadcasting, or in any way transmitting images or sounds of the private body parts of a person including the genitalia, buttocks, or female breasts, or a person's body underneath that person's clothing; or (b) In any private place, any device for the purpose of observing, photographing, recording, amplifying or broadcasting, or in any way transmitting images or sounds in such place; or (c) Outside a private place, any device for the purpose of hearing, recording, amplifying, broadcasting, observing, or in any way transmitting images, location, movement, or sounds originating in such place which would not ordinarily be audible, visible, or comprehensible outside such place. II.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at gc.nh.gov
Cited in 4 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2023
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. McLellan (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 1999, 144 N.H. 602)“…pposite. Finally, we reject the defendant’s argument that RSA 644:9 (1996) supports his claim that he had a…”
- State of New Hampshire v. Justin M. Lamontagne (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 2023)“…assault and a case involving dissemination of an image. See RSA 644:9- a, II(c). We fail to see such a distin…”
- State v. Richard Lucas (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 2018)“…(1) an intent to commit a violation of privacy pursuant to RSA 644:9, III-a or IV (2016) does not satisfy th…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: New Hampshire School Recording Laws, New Hampshire Workplace Recording Laws, New Hampshire Drone Laws: RSA 644:23 & Privacy Rules (2026)
New Hampshire Revised Statutes Annotated, TITLE LXII CRIMINAL CODE, CHAPTER 651 SENTENCES
§ 651:2Sentences and Limitations.In forcecited in 14 of our articles
I. A person convicted of a felony or a Class A misdemeanor may be sentenced to imprisonment, probation, conditional or unconditional discharge, or a fine. II. If a sentence of imprisonment is imposed, the court shall fix the maximum thereof which is not to exceed: (a) Fifteen years for a class A felony, (b) Seven years for a class B felony, (c) One year for a class A misdemeanor, (d) Life imprisonment for murder in the second degree, and, in the case of a felony only, a minimum which is not to exceed 1/2 of the maximum, or if the maximum is life imprisonment, such minimum term as the court may order. II-a. A person convicted of murder in the first degree shall be sentenced as provided in RSA 630:1-a. II-b. A person convicted of a second or subsequent offense for the felonious use of a firearm, as provided in RSA 650-A:1, shall, in addition to any punishment provided for the underlying felony, be given a minimum mandatory sentence of 3 years imprisonment.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at gc.nh.gov
Cited in 147 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):State v. Russell (2009) found plain error where the jury was never asked whether the deadly weapon was a firearm, as RSA 651:2, II-g requires, but affirmed the extended term because that evidence was overwhelming. State v. Elbert (1984) held the minimum and maximum term rule of RSA 651:2, II applies only if a defendant is parole eligible.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Kousounadis (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 2009, 159 N.H. 413)“…rder, see RSA 173-B:9, III (2002). He was sentenced under RSA 651:2, II-g (2007). We affirm in part, revers…”
- State v. Russell (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 2009, 159 N.H. 475)✓A jury convicted Russell of armed robbery but was never instructed it had to find the deadly weapon was a firearm; the court called the resulting RSA 651:2, II-g enhanced sentence plain error yet declined to disturb it given overwhelming, undisputed firearm evidence.
- Duquette v. Warden, New Hampshire State Prison (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 2007, 154 N.H. 737)✓A prisoner serving consecutive sexual assault terms argued no statute allowed them; the court found RSA 651:2 silent on consecutive sentences except its firearm provision in II-b, but held trial courts retain common law authority to impose them and rejected a vagueness challenge.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: New Hampshire Ring Doorbell Laws: What You Need to Know in 2026, New Hampshire Surveillance Camera Laws (2026 Guide), New Hampshire AI Meeting Recording Laws (2026)
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- RSA 570-A:2 - Interception Prohibited(gc.nh.gov).gov
- RSA 570-A:1 - Definitions(gc.nh.gov).gov
- RSA 91-A - Right-to-Know Law(gc.nh.gov).gov
- RSA 644:9 - Violation of Privacy(gc.nh.gov).gov
- NH AG - Right to Know(doj.nh.gov).gov
- NH Right-to-Know Presentation(governor.nh.gov).gov
- RSA 625:9 - Classification of Crimes(gc.nh.gov).gov
- RSA 651:2 - Sentences and Limitations(gc.nh.gov).gov