Alaska
Truck Accident Laws in Alaska (2026): Deadlines & Liability
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 16, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 16, 2026. · 6 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

A truck accident claim in Alaska runs on two tracks at once. State tort law sets the deadline to sue, decides how fault affects what you can recover, and governs auto insurance. Federal law, enforced by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), regulates how commercial trucks and their drivers must operate, and those rules often supply the evidence of fault.
This page explains both. It is general legal information, not legal advice, and deadlines and outcomes turn on the specific facts, so confirm how the law applies to your situation with a licensed Alaska attorney.
Statute of Limitations in Alaska
Under AS 09.10.070, an action for personal injury based on tort, including a truck crash, must be brought within two years. The clock generally starts on the date of the crash. Missing the deadline usually means the court will dismiss the case for good, no matter how clear the trucking company's fault.
Limited exceptions exist. The deadline can be tolled for a minor or for a person who is incompetent, and a discovery rule may apply where an injury could not reasonably have been found right away. Alaska also has a general statute of repose. Because these rules are fact-specific, confirm your exact deadline with a licensed attorney.
Wrongful Death in Alaska
When a truck crash causes death, the claim proceeds under Alaska's wrongful death statute, AS 09.55.580. The action is brought by the personal representative of the deceased and must be commenced within two years after the death. Damages are what the court or jury finds fair and just for the loss, which can include the survivors' economic and other losses recognized by the statute.
Negligence Rule: Pure Comparative Fault
Alaska follows pure comparative negligence. Under AS 09.17.060, any contributory fault charged to the injured person reduces the award in proportion to that fault, but it does not bar recovery. In practice, if a jury finds you 30% responsible for the crash, your damages are reduced by 30%. Within the comparative-fault system, even a plaintiff found mostly at fault can still recover the remaining share.

This is the opposite of the all-or-nothing contributory rule used in a few states. It means fault allocation affects the size of a recovery rather than eliminating it, but the percentages still matter a great deal, so the evidence of who did what remains central.
Comparative fault is not the whole picture, though. A separate statute, AS 09.65.210, bars recovery entirely in specific situations. A person injured while operating a vehicle under the influence in violation of AS 28.35.030 may not recover damages for that injury if the person was convicted, or if the party defending the claim proves the violation by clear and convincing evidence, and the conduct substantially contributed to the injury or death. The same total bar applies to a person injured while committing certain felonies, or while fleeing or being apprehended for them, on the same clear-and-convincing proof. So an impaired driver hit by a truck can be left with no claim at all, rather than a reduced one.
No-Fault and PIP
Alaska is not a no-fault state. It uses a traditional fault-based (tort) system, so the party who caused the crash, and that party's insurer or employer, is responsible for the resulting harm. There is no personal-injury-protection (PIP) threshold you must clear before you can sue. You pursue the at-fault driver and the motor carrier directly.
Damage Caps and State Insurance
Alaska does not cap economic damages such as medical bills and lost earnings. It does cap noneconomic damages (pain and suffering) under AS 09.17.010: the limit is the greater of a base amount or a figure tied to life expectancy, and a higher cap applies in cases of severe permanent physical impairment or severe disfigurement. A licensed attorney can explain how the current figures apply to a given case.
For coverage context, Alaska's minimum auto-liability requirement is 50/100/25: $50,000 per person and $100,000 per accident for bodily injury, and $25,000 for property damage. Commercial trucks are subject to far higher federal minimums, discussed below.
Your own insurance status can also erase a whole category of damages. Under AS 09.65.320, Alaska's "no pay, no play" rule, a person injured while operating a motor vehicle who knew they were not in compliance with the mandatory liability-insurance requirements of AS 28.22.011 (or AS 28.20, where it applies) may not recover noneconomic losses at all. Economic damages remain available. The bar does not apply if the party liable for the crash was driving under the influence, acted intentionally, recklessly or with gross negligence, fled the scene, or was acting in furtherance of or in immediate flight from a felony. Because a truck crash often produces large pain-and-suffering claims, whether the injured driver carried the required coverage can matter enormously.
Federal FMCSA Rules That Shape Liability
Interstate trucking is governed by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations in Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations. Violations are frequently the clearest proof of negligence in a truck case. Key areas include:

- Hours of service (49 CFR Part 395): a property-carrying driver may drive at most 11 hours after 10 consecutive hours off duty, cannot drive beyond the 14th hour on duty, and is capped at 60 hours in 7 days or 70 in 8. These limits target fatigue.
- Electronic logging devices (49 CFR Part 395, Subpart B): most drivers must use an ELD that connects to the engine and automatically records driving time, motion, and location, replacing easily falsified paper logs.
- Driver qualification and CDL (49 CFR Part 391): carriers must verify a driver's commercial license, medical certification, and record before putting that driver on the road.
- Drug and alcohol testing (49 CFR Part 382): pre-employment, random, and post-accident testing is mandatory.
- Inspection, repair, and maintenance (49 CFR Part 396): trucks must be systematically inspected and kept in safe operating condition, with records to prove it.
Who Can Be Liable
A truck crash usually involves more potential defendants than a car crash, and many are corporations. Depending on the facts, those who may share liability include:
- the truck driver, for negligent driving or hours-of-service violations;
- the motor carrier (trucking company), often vicariously for its driver and directly for negligent hiring, training, supervision, or maintenance;
- a broker or shipper that arranged or controlled the load;
- a cargo loader whose improper loading caused a shift or rollover; and
- a parts or truck manufacturer, if a defect contributed.
Identifying every responsible party matters because each may carry separate insurance, and because Alaska's pure comparative system apportions fault among everyone involved.
Federal Minimum Insurance: $750,000
Under 49 CFR 387.9, a for-hire carrier operating in interstate commerce with a vehicle rated over 10,001 pounds must maintain at least $750,000 in liability coverage for general (nonhazardous) freight. Carriers hauling certain hazardous materials must carry $1,000,000 or $5,000,000. These minimums dwarf the $50,000 per-person bodily-injury minimum on a typical Alaska car policy, which is a major reason trucking cases are litigated differently.
Preserving Evidence
Much of the proof in a truck case lives on the truck and in company files, and it can disappear fast. ELD and logbook data, the engine control module or onboard "black box," dashcam footage, and maintenance and inspection records can be overwritten or routinely discarded. A timely written preservation (spoliation) letter to the carrier helps keep this evidence intact, and in Alaska it can also pin down the fault percentages that drive the recovery.

How to Evaluate a Potential Claim
Move quickly. Get the police crash report, photograph the scene and vehicles, keep all medical records and bills, and write down the date of the crash and of any later-discovered injury. Note any witness names and the truck and trailer company markings.
Most personal-injury attorneys offer a free initial consultation and work on a contingency fee, meaning they are paid only out of a recovery. No attorney can promise an outcome or a dollar amount, and only a licensed Alaska attorney can assess whether your specific facts support a claim within the deadlines.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the deadline to sue for a truck accident in Alaska?
Generally two years from the date of the crash for an injury claim under AS 09.10.070, and two years from the date of death for a wrongful-death claim under AS 09.55.580. Some situations toll the deadline, so confirm yours with a licensed Alaska attorney before relying on any date.
Who can be sued after a truck accident in Alaska?
Often several parties: the driver, the motor carrier (both vicariously and for negligent hiring, training, supervision, or maintenance), a broker or shipper, a cargo loader, and a parts or truck manufacturer if a defect contributed. Truck cases routinely have multiple, often corporate, defendants.
How is a truck accident different from a car accident in Alaska?
Commercial trucks are regulated by the federal FMCSA rules in 49 CFR, so violations of hours-of-service, logging, maintenance, and testing requirements can prove negligence. Interstate carriers must also carry at least $750,000 in liability coverage, far more than a typical car policy, and there are usually more defendants and more electronic evidence to preserve.
How does Alaska's comparative negligence rule affect my case?
Alaska uses pure comparative negligence under AS 09.17.060, so within the comparative-fault system your damages are reduced by your percentage of fault rather than eliminated, even if you are found mostly at fault. Separate statutes can still bar a claim outright: AS 09.65.210 denies all damages to a claimant injured while driving under the influence (on conviction or clear and convincing proof) or while committing certain felonies, where that conduct substantially contributed to the injury.
Can I recover if I was uninsured when the truck hit me?
You can still pursue economic damages such as medical bills and lost wages, but AS 09.65.320 bars noneconomic damages (pain and suffering) for a person who was operating a motor vehicle knowing they were not in compliance with Alaska's mandatory liability-insurance requirements. That bar lifts if the party liable for the crash was impaired, acted intentionally, recklessly or with gross negligence, fled the scene, or was fleeing a felony.
Is Alaska a no-fault state for truck accidents?
No. Alaska uses a fault-based system, so you pursue the at-fault driver and trucking company directly. There is no personal-injury-protection (PIP) threshold to clear before filing.
How much is a truck accident case worth in Alaska?
There is no fixed value. Compensation depends on the facts, the injuries, the available insurance, and the evidence. Economic damages are not capped, though Alaska caps noneconomic damages under AS 09.17.010 and bars them entirely for a knowingly uninsured driver under AS 09.65.320. No attorney can guarantee an outcome or a dollar amount; a licensed attorney can assess your situation.
What is the minimum insurance a trucking company must carry?
Under 49 CFR 387.9, interstate for-hire carriers of general freight must carry at least $750,000 in liability coverage, with $1,000,000 or $5,000,000 required for certain hazardous materials. That is well above Alaska's 50/100/25 minimum for cars.
Injured in Alaska? Get a free case review from a personal-injury attorney
If someone else's negligence caused your injury, you may be owed compensation for medical bills, lost wages, and pain and suffering. Get a free, no-obligation review from a Alaska personal-injury attorney. Most work on contingency, so there is no upfront cost.
Updates
Clarified that Alaska's pure comparative negligence rule operates within the comparative-fault system and added the separate statutory bars that can defeat a claim outright: no damages for a claimant injured while driving under the influence or committing certain felonies (AS 09.65.210), and no noneconomic damages for a knowingly uninsured driver (AS 09.65.320).
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Alaska Statutes, Title 9. Code of Civil Procedure, Chapter 17. Civil Damages and Apportionment of Fault
§ 09.17.060Effect of contributory faultIn forcecited in 8 of our articles
In an action based on fault seeking to recover damages for injury or death to a person or harm to property, contributory fault chargeable to the claimant diminishes proportionately the amount awarded as compensatory damages for the injury attributable to the claimant's contributory fault, but does not bar recovery.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-08 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at akleg.gov
Cited in 20 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Sowinski v. Walker (2008) described AS 09.17.060 as stating that a claimant cannot recover the portion of damages attributable to the claimant's own fault. Smith v. Ingersoll-Rand Co. (2000) held the 1986 act that enacted this rule broadened comparative fault in strict products liability to include a plaintiff's ordinary negligence.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Sowinski v. Walker (Alaska Supreme Court 2008, 198 P.3d 1134)✓Two minors who drank liquor bought at DelRois Liquor Store died when their ATV struck a cable. The court described AS 09.17.060 as Alaska's codified comparative negligence rule and, with the pure several liability of AS 09.17.080, held the store owed only its 35 percent share.
- Loeb v. Rasmussen (Alaska Supreme Court 1991, 822 P.2d 914)✓A liquor store sold alcohol to a 17-year-old without checking her age, and she was hurt driving drunk. The court read AS 09.17.060 as leaving intact the rule barring the licensee from charging the minor's fault, but Sowinski (2008) called that passage dicta and superseded it.
- Smith v. Ingersoll-Rand Co. (Alaska Supreme Court 2000, 14 P.3d 990)“…s). 28 . Id. 29 . AS 09.17.060. 30 . AS 09.17.900…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Alaska Dog Bite Laws: Liability and Victim Rights, Alaska Hit and Run Laws: Penalties and What to Do, Medical Malpractice Laws in Alaska (2026): Deadlines & Caps
§ 09.17.010Noneconomic damagesIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
(a) In an action to recover damages for personal injury or wrongful death, all damage claims for noneconomic losses shall be limited to compensation for pain, suffering, inconvenience, physical impairment, disfigurement, loss of enjoyment of life, loss of consortium, and other nonpecuniary damage. (b) Except as provided under (c) of this section, the damages awarded by a court or a jury under (a) of this section for all claims, including a loss of consortium claim, arising out of a single injury or death may not exceed $400,000 or the injured person's life expectancy in years multiplied by $8,000, whichever is greater. (c) In an action for personal injury, the damages awarded by a court or jury that are described under (b) of this section may not exceed $1,000,000 or the person's life expectancy in years multiplied by $25,000, whichever is greater, when the damages are awarded for severe permanent physical impairment or severe disfigurement. (d) Multiple injuries sustained by one person as a result of a single incident shall be treated as a single injury for purposes of this section.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at akleg.gov
Cited in 26 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Evans Ex Rel. Kutch v. State (Alaska Supreme Court 2002, 56 P.3d 1046)“…1997:(1) the cap on noneconomic and punitive damages under AS 09.17.010 and .020; (2) the requirement that half…”
- L.D.G., Inc. v. Brown (Alaska Supreme Court 2009, 211 P.3d 1110)“…he non-economic damages were subject to a damages cap under AS 09.17.010, which would limit the non-economic dam…”
- State v. Carpenter (Alaska Supreme Court 2007, 171 P.3d 41)“…claim. Carpenter moved after trial for an order declaring AS 09.17.010(b) and AS 09.17.020(j) unconstitutional…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Alaska Slip and Fall Laws: Proving Premises Liability
Alaska Statutes, Title 9. Code of Civil Procedure, Chapter 10. Limitations of Actions
§ 09.10.070Actions for torts, for injury to personal property, for certain statutory liabilities, and against peace officers and coroners to be brought in two yearsIn forcecited in 10 of our articles
(a) Except as otherwise provided by law, a person may not bring an action (1) for libel, slander, assault, battery, seduction, or false imprisonment, (2) for personal injury or death, or injury to the rights of another not arising on contract and not specifically provided otherwise; (3) for taking, detaining, or injuring personal property, including an action for its specific recovery; (4) upon a statute for a forfeiture or penalty to the state; or (5) upon a liability created by statute, other than a penalty or forfeiture; unless the action is commenced within two years of the accrual of the cause of action. (b) A person may not bring an action against a peace officer or coroner upon a liability incurred by the doing of an act in an official capacity or by the omission of an official duty, including the nonpayment of money collected upon an execution, unless brought within two years. This subsection does not apply to an action for an escape.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at akleg.gov
Cited in 228 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Alaska courts apply the two-year limit of AS 09.10.070(a) to personal injury and other tort claims. Cikan v. ARCO Alaska, Inc. (2005) held mental incompetency under AS 09.10.140(a) can toll it, with the competency dispute resolved at a pretrial hearing. Robinson v. Alaska Hous. Fin. Corp. (2019) applied it to dismiss untimely tort claims.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Adkins v. Nabors Alaska Drilling, Inc. (Alaska Supreme Court 1980, 609 P.2d 15)✓A worker who suffered a head injury tripping over a hose at a drilling site added a new defendant eight months after AS 09.10.070's two-year period ran. The court held his evidence of concussion and amnesia raised a fact issue on tolling, so summary judgment was improper.
- Evans Ex Rel. Kutch v. State (Alaska Supreme Court 2002, 56 P.3d 1046)✓Injured plaintiffs facially challenged Alaska's 1997 tort reform, including how AS 09.10.070's two-year limit works with the minors tolling rule. The court held the narrower tolling given to children hurt before their eighth birthday is rationally based and upheld the scheme.
- Cikan v. ARCO Alaska, Inc. (Alaska Supreme Court 2005, 125 P.3d 335)✓A woman who slipped on ice outside an office building and hit her head sued nearly nine years later. The court held AS 09.10.070(a)'s two-year limit would ordinarily bar the claim, but her evidence of post-concussion incompetency required a pretrial evidentiary hearing.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Alaska Car Accident Laws: Fault, Insurance, and Your Claim, Alaska Defamation Laws: Libel, Slander & Suing (2026), Alaska Medical Records Retention Laws (2026 Guide)
Alaska Statutes, Title 9. Code of Civil Procedure, Chapter 55. Special Actions and Proceedings
§ 09.55.580Action for wrongful deathIn forcecited in 5 of our articles
(a) Except as provided under (f) of this section and AS 09.65.145, when the death of a person is caused by the wrongful act or omission of another, the personal representatives of the former may maintain an action therefor against the latter, if the former might have maintained an action, had the person lived, against the latter for an injury done by the same act or omission. The action shall be commenced within two years after the death, and the damages therein shall be the damages the court or jury may consider fair and just. The amount recovered, if any, shall be exclusively for the benefit of the decedent's spouse and children when the decedent is survived by a spouse or children, or other dependents. When the decedent is survived by no spouse or children or other dependents, the amount recovered shall be administered as other personal property of the decedent but shall be limited to pecuniary loss. When the plaintiff prevails, the trial court shall determine the allowable costs and expenses of the action and may, in its discretion, require notice and hearing thereon.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-06 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at akleg.gov
Cited in 72 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Atkinson v. Haldane (Alaska Supreme Court 1977, 569 P.2d 151)“…a Indian Community by virtue of 28 U.S.C. § 1360 (a) 1970, AS 09.55.580 and AS 09.65.070. [2] The superior cou…”
- Haakanson v. Wakefield Seafoods, Inc. (Alaska Supreme Court 1979, 600 P.2d 1087)“…o extend the time limit for bringing an action set forth in AS 09.55.580, 2 the wrongful death stat…”
- L.D.G., Inc. v. Brown (Alaska Supreme Court 2009, 211 P.3d 1110)“…because it is relevant to Alaska's wrongful death statute, AS 09.55.580. That statute limits damages to "the na…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Motorcycle Accident Laws in Alaska (2026): Deadlines & Helmets, Alaska Statute of Limitations: Filing Deadlines by Case Type, Wrongful Death Laws in Alaska (2026): Deadlines & Who Can Sue
Code of Federal Regulations Title 49
§ 387.9Financial responsibility, minimum levels.In forcecited in 52 of our articles
The minimum levels of financial responsibility referred to in § 387.7 are hereby prescribed as follows: Table 1 to § 387.9—Schedule of Limits—Public Liability Type of carriage Commodity transported January 1, 1985 (1) For-hire (In interstate or foreign commerce, with a gross vehicle weight rating of 10,001 or more pounds) Property (nonhazardous) $750,000 (2) For-hire and Private (In interstate, foreign, or intrastate commerce, with a gross vehicle weight rating of 10,001 or more pounds) Hazardous substances, as defined in 49 CFR 171.8, transported in bulk in cargo tanks, portable tanks, or hopper-type vehicles; in bulk Division 1.1, 1.2 or 1.3 materials; in bulk Division 2.3, Hazard Zone A material; in bulk Division 6.1, Packing Group I, Hazard Zone A material, in bulk Division 2.1 or 2.2 material; or highway route controlled quantities of a Class 7 material, as defined in 49 CFR 173.403 5,000,000 (3) For-hire and Private (In interstate or foreign commerce, in any quantity; or in intrastate commerce, in bulk only; with a gross vehicle weight rating of 10,001 or more pounds) Oil listed in 49 CFR 172.101; hazardous waste, hazardous materials, or hazardous substances defined in 49…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ecfr.gov
Cited in 45 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Carolina Casualty Insurance v. Yeates (2009) held an MCS-90 endorsement applies only where the underlying policy gives no coverage and the carrier's insurance falls below the minimums 49 CFR 387.9 prescribes. GREAT WEST CAS. v. General Cas. Co. of Wisconsin (2010) found that purpose met once other coverage exceeded the 387.9 amount.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- GREAT WEST CAS. v. General Cas. Co. of Wisconsin (District Court, D. Minnesota 2010, 734 F. Supp. 2d 718)“…ardous commodities is $750,000. 49 U.S.C. § 31139 (b)(2); 49 C.F.R. § 387.9 . Under the Federal Motor Carrie…”
- Carolina Casualty Insurance v. Yeates (Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit 2009, 584 F.3d 868)✓A trucker's own insurer paid the Yeateses the full $750,000 that section 387.9 sets as the minimum for non-hazardous property, and the en banc court held a second insurer's MCS-90 endorsement was therefore never triggered and added no coverage.
- American Inter-Fidelity Exchange v. American Re-Insurance Company (Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit 1994, 17 F.3d 1018)✓A truck insurer sought reinsurance for $846,256 in deductibles it paid accident victims but could not collect; the court read the mandatory endorsement to require insurers to cover victims from the first dollar up to section 387.9's minimums, and reversed the dismissal.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Truck Accident Laws in Connecticut (2026): Deadlines & Liability, Truck Accident Laws in Alabama (2026): Deadlines & Liability, Truck Accident Laws in Iowa (2026): Deadlines & Liability
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- AS 09.10.070 - Actions for torts to be brought in two years (2-year personal-injury limitation)(akleg.gov).gov
- AS 09.17.060 - Effect of contributory fault (pure comparative: fault reduces award proportionately but does not bar recovery)(akleg.gov).gov
- AS 09.55.580 - Action for wrongful death (brought by personal representative within two years of death)(akleg.gov).gov
- AS 09.17.010 - Noneconomic damages cap (base limit and higher limit for severe permanent impairment or disfigurement)(akleg.gov).gov
- 49 CFR 387.9 - Financial responsibility, minimum levels ($750,000 general freight; $1,000,000 and $5,000,000 for hazardous materials)(law.cornell.edu)
- 49 CFR Part 395 - Hours of Service of Drivers (11-hour driving limit, 14-hour window, ELD requirement in Subpart B)(ecfr.gov).gov
- FMCSA - Hours of Service (HOS) regulations overview, property-carrying driver limits(fmcsa.dot.gov).gov
- AS 09.65.210 - Damages resulting from commission of a felony or while under the influence of alcohol or drugs (total bar to recovery)(akleg.gov)
- AS 09.65.320 - Nonrecovery for noneconomic losses resulting from operating a motor vehicle while uninsured (Alaska's no pay, no play rule)(akleg.gov)