Indiana
Indiana Surveillance Camera Laws (2026 Guide)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 16, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 16, 2026. · 2 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Indiana allows surveillance cameras on your own home or business property in areas without a reasonable expectation of privacy. Placing a camera on someone else's private property without consent violates IC 35-46-8.5-1. For audio recording, Indiana follows one-party consent under IC 35-33.5-5-5, meaning at least one participant must agree.
Overview of Indiana Surveillance Camera Laws
Indiana does not have a single unified surveillance camera statute. Instead, several state laws work together to regulate where and how cameras can be used. The key statutes include IC 35-46-8.5-1 (unlawful photography and surveillance on private property), IC 35-45-4-5 (voyeurism, public voyeurism, and aerial voyeurism), and IC 35-33.5-5-5 (unlawful interception of communications).
The central principle across all of these laws is the concept of a "reasonable expectation of privacy." Surveillance cameras are generally legal in Indiana when used in areas where people do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy, such as public streets, front yards, driveways, and common areas of businesses. Recording becomes illegal when cameras are used to capture images or audio in private spaces without proper consent.
Understanding these laws is essential for homeowners installing security systems, employers setting up workplace monitoring, and anyone who wants to protect their own privacy rights under Indiana law.
Last verified: March 2026. This page reflects current Indiana Code and the Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act (effective January 1, 2026).
Table of Contents
- Overview of Indiana Surveillance Camera Laws
- Home Security Camera Laws in Indiana
- Workplace Surveillance Laws
- Hidden Cameras and Voyeurism Laws (IC 35-45-4-5)
- Audio Recording and One-Party Consent (IC 35-33.5-5-5)
- Neighbor Disputes and Camera Placement
- Nanny Cams and In-Home Monitoring
- Drone Surveillance and Aerial Voyeurism
- Penalties for Violating Indiana Surveillance Laws
- Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act (2026)
- Frequently Asked Questions
- Sources and References
Home Security Camera Laws in Indiana
Indiana law permits homeowners to install security cameras on their own property for purposes such as deterring crime, monitoring deliveries, and keeping an eye on their home while away. There is no state law requiring homeowners to register security cameras or obtain a permit before installation.

Where You Can Place Home Security Cameras
You can legally place cameras in the following areas of your property:
- Front door and porch areas for monitoring visitors and package deliveries
- Driveways and garages to record vehicle activity
- Backyards to monitor your own property
- Common living areas inside your home, such as living rooms and kitchens
- Exterior walls aimed at your own property boundaries
Where You Cannot Place Cameras
Under Indiana law, cameras must never be placed in areas where people have a reasonable expectation of privacy. Even in your own home, you should avoid placing cameras in:
- Bathrooms and restrooms where guests or household members expect privacy
- Guest bedrooms where overnight visitors would expect to be unobserved
- Changing areas or any space where a person may undress
Recording Your Own Property vs. Neighboring Property
Your security cameras may incidentally capture portions of a neighbor's property, such as a shared fence line or a section of their driveway visible from a public vantage point. This type of incidental recording is generally legal. However, specifically aiming cameras to record areas of a neighbor's property where they have a reasonable expectation of privacy, such as the interior of their home through a window, could violate IC 35-45-4-5 (voyeurism) or IC 35-46-8.5-1 (unlawful surveillance on private property).
Workplace Surveillance Laws
Indiana does not have a specific statute governing workplace video surveillance. However, employers must comply with general state criminal statutes and federal guidelines when monitoring employees.

What Employers Can Do
Employers in Indiana may legally install video surveillance cameras in the following areas:
- Common work areas such as production floors, offices, and hallways
- Entrances and exits for security and attendance monitoring
- Parking lots and loading docks to deter theft and monitor safety
- Retail sales floors for loss prevention
Employers are not required by Indiana law to notify employees that video surveillance cameras are in use. However, providing notice is considered a best practice and may be required under company policy or union agreements.
What Employers Cannot Do
Employers are prohibited from placing cameras in areas where employees have a reasonable expectation of privacy, including:
- Restrooms and bathrooms
- Changing rooms and locker rooms
- Lactation rooms or break rooms where employees change clothes
Audio Recording in the Workplace
Audio surveillance in the workplace carries additional legal risk. Under Indiana's one-party consent law (IC 35-33.5-5-5), recording conversations requires the consent of at least one party to the communication. Employers who record workplace audio should post clear and conspicuous signage stating "Audio and Video Recording in Progress" to establish constructive consent from employees and visitors who remain in the monitored area after seeing the notice.
Employee Tracking Devices
Under IC 22-5-8, Indiana prohibits employers from requiring employees to have any device implanted in their body as a condition of employment. This includes microchips, RFID tags, and any acoustic, optical, mechanical, electronic, medical, or molecular device. Employers who violate this law may face injunctions and be required to pay actual damages, court costs, and attorney's fees.
Hidden Cameras and Voyeurism Laws (IC 35-45-4-5)
Indiana's voyeurism statute, IC 35-45-4-5, is one of the most important laws governing hidden cameras in the state. This statute covers three types of voyeurism: basic voyeurism, public voyeurism, and aerial voyeurism.
Basic Voyeurism (Class B Misdemeanor)
A person commits voyeurism when they:
- Peep or go upon the land of another person with the intent to peep into an occupied dwelling
- Peep into an area where an occupant can reasonably be expected to disrobe, such as restrooms, baths, showers, and dressing rooms, without the consent of the occupant
This basic offense is a Class B misdemeanor, punishable by up to 180 days in jail and a fine of up to $1,000.
Camera-Assisted Voyeurism (Level 6 Felony)
The offense becomes a Level 6 felony when committed by means of a camera, video camera, or any other type of recording device. This is a critical distinction: using a hidden camera to commit voyeurism automatically elevates the charge to a felony.
A Level 6 felony in Indiana carries a sentence of 6 months to 2.5 years in prison and a fine of up to $10,000.
Public Voyeurism
A person commits public voyeurism, a Class A misdemeanor, when they peep at the private area of another individual and record an image using a camera. "Private area" is defined as the naked or undergarment-clad genitals, pubic area, or buttocks of an individual.
Public voyeurism becomes a Level 6 felony if:
- The person has a prior unrelated voyeurism conviction
- The person publishes or shares the images online
- The person transmits or disseminates the captured images to another person
Unlawful Surveillance on Private Property (IC 35-46-8.5-1)
Under IC 35-46-8.5-1, it is illegal to knowingly or intentionally place an unattended camera or electronic surveillance equipment on another person's private property without the owner's or tenant's consent. This offense is a Class A misdemeanor, punishable by up to one year in jail and a fine of up to $5,000.
The statute also makes it illegal to place a tracking device on an individual or their property without that person's knowledge or consent.
Exceptions to IC 35-46-8.5-1 include:
- Law enforcement officers with a valid search warrant or the property owner's consent
- A person using a tracking device to locate a family member (unless a protective order has been issued against them by that family member)
- A person placing a tracking device on property in which they hold an ownership or contractual interest (unless a protective order applies)
Audio Recording and One-Party Consent (IC 35-33.5-5-5)
Indiana is a one-party consent state for recording conversations. Under IC 35-33.5-5-5, it is legal to record a phone call or conversation as long as at least one person participating in the communication consents to the recording.

What One-Party Consent Means in Practice
- You can record your own conversations. If you are a party to the conversation, you may record it without telling the other person.
- You cannot record conversations you are not part of. Secretly recording a conversation between two other people, where you are not a participant and no participant has given consent, is illegal.
- Security cameras with audio capabilities must be used with this law in mind. Indiana's wiretap article reaches the interception of an "electronic communication," which IC 35-31.5-2-110 defines as a transfer of signs, signals, images, sounds, or oral communication "transmitted in whole or in part by a wire, a radio, or an electromagnetic, a photoelectronic, or a photo-optical system." A camera that captures a phone call or another transmitted communication you are not part of can therefore violate the statute. Whether the article reaches a purely face-to-face conversation picked up by a camera microphone is unsettled in Indiana, so treat recording other people's in-person conversations as legally risky rather than clearly permitted.
Penalties for Unlawful Interception
Under IC 35-33.5-5-5(b), a person who knowingly or intentionally intercepts a communication in violation of the wiretap article commits unlawful interception, a Level 5 felony. This carries:
- 1 to 6 years in prison (advisory sentence of 3 years)
- A fine of up to $10,000
In addition to criminal penalties, a person whose communications were illegally intercepted may bring a civil lawsuit for damages under IC 35-33.5-5-4.
Exceptions to Indiana's Wiretapping Law
Indiana's wiretap article is narrower than the federal wiretap statute, and it contains fewer exceptions than many summaries suggest. The provisions that actually appear in IC 35-33.5 are:
- Law enforcement acting under a warrant issued under IC 35-33.5-2 and IC 35-33.5-3. Only a prosecuting attorney may apply, and only the state police may install the interception equipment.
- Interceptions authorized under federal law. IC 35-33.5-5-5(a) states that the offense provision does not apply to a person who makes an interception authorized under federal law.
- Immunity for those who assist an authorized interception. IC 35-33.5-5-6 gives civil and criminal immunity to communication service providers, their employees and contractors, and to landlords, custodians, and property owners who furnish information, facilities, or technical assistance in accordance with the article.
Two exceptions often attributed to Indiana are not in the Indiana Code at all. Indiana has no routine-maintenance or system-protection exception for communication service providers, and no emergency or danger-to-life exception. Those are federal provisions under 18 U.S.C. 2511 and 2518, and they do not create a defense under Indiana law. The Indiana immunity provision in IC 35-33.5-5-6 covers assistance to an interception that is already authorized, which is not the same thing as a maintenance exception.
Neighbor Disputes and Camera Placement
Disputes between neighbors over security cameras are common in Indiana. Here is what the law says about common scenarios.
Can a Neighbor Point a Camera at Your Property?
A neighbor may point a security camera in the general direction of your property if the camera is installed on their own land and captures areas visible from a public vantage point. Incidental capture of your front yard, driveway, or sidewalk is generally legal because there is no reasonable expectation of privacy in those areas.
However, a neighbor's camera may be illegal if it:
- Is placed directly on your property without your consent (violating IC 35-46-8.5-1)
- Is aimed into the interior of your home through windows (potentially violating IC 35-45-4-5)
- Records audio of your private conversations without your consent (violating IC 35-33.5-5-5)
What to Do if You Have a Camera Dispute
If you believe a neighbor's camera is illegally invading your privacy, consider the following steps:
- Document the situation. Take photos showing the camera's position and what it appears to record. Note dates, times, and specific concerns.
- Talk to your neighbor. Many camera disputes arise from misunderstandings about the camera's field of view. A respectful conversation may resolve the issue.
- Check local ordinances. Some Indiana municipalities have additional rules about camera placement, property setbacks, or nuisance provisions that may apply.
- File a police report. If you believe a criminal statute is being violated, contact local law enforcement and reference the specific Indiana Code section at issue.
- Consult an attorney. A lawyer can evaluate whether the surveillance constitutes an actionable invasion of privacy under Indiana tort law.
HOA and Local Ordinance Restrictions
While Indiana state law does not restrict homeowners from installing cameras on their own property, homeowners' associations (HOAs) and local municipal ordinances may have additional rules about the type, size, number, or placement of exterior cameras. Always check your HOA covenants and local building codes before installing a camera system.
Nanny Cams and In-Home Monitoring
Nanny cams are legal in Indiana when used for video-only recording in common areas of your home. Indiana has no statute that requires you to notify visitors or household workers that a video-only camera is in use. What Indiana law restricts is where a camera may point and whether it captures audio.
Video-Only Nanny Cams
You may legally place a video-only nanny cam in common areas of your home, including:
- Living rooms and family rooms
- Kitchens and dining areas
- Playrooms and nurseries
- Hallways and entryways
You should never place a nanny cam, even a video-only one, in a bathroom, a guest bedroom, or any area where a person would reasonably expect to change clothes or be unobserved.
Audio Recording with Nanny Cams
If your nanny cam records audio, Indiana's one-party consent law applies. Because you will not be present for many of the conversations recorded, the safest approach is to:
- Inform your nanny or caregiver in writing that audio and video recording takes place in your home.
- Post visible signage in areas where recording occurs.
- Obtain written consent as part of your employment agreement with the caregiver.
This approach ensures compliance with IC 35-33.5-5-5 and protects you from potential civil and criminal liability.
Using Nanny Cam Footage as Evidence
Footage from a legally installed nanny cam is generally admissible in Indiana courts. If the footage captures abuse, neglect, or theft, it can be used to support criminal charges or civil claims. Illegally obtained footage, such as a recording made in a private area or an audio recording without proper consent, may be inadmissible and could expose the homeowner to criminal charges.
Drone Surveillance and Aerial Voyeurism
Indiana has specific provisions addressing drone surveillance under IC 35-45-4-5(g). A person commits remote aerial voyeurism when they operate an unmanned aerial vehicle with the intent to peep and cause the drone to enter the space above or surrounding another person's occupied dwelling to capture images, photographs, video recordings, or audio recordings of the occupant.
Penalties for Aerial Voyeurism
Remote aerial voyeurism is a Class A misdemeanor, punishable by up to one year in jail and a fine of up to $5,000. The offense becomes a Level 6 felony if:
- The person has a prior unrelated voyeurism conviction
- The person publishes or distributes the captured images or recordings
- The person transmits the recordings to another person
Law Enforcement Drone Use
Under IC 35-33-5-9, law enforcement officers must obtain a search warrant before using a drone to conduct a search, perform surveillance, or obtain photographs or video of private property or individuals on private property, without the consent of the property owner. The statute's only stated exception is that no warrant is required for a drone use if a warrant would not be required for the same search without a drone.
Penalties for Violating Indiana Surveillance Laws
Indiana's surveillance penalties vary depending on the specific offense. Here is a summary of the key penalties:
| Offense | Classification | Jail/Prison | Maximum Fine |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful surveillance on private property (IC 35-46-8.5-1) | Class A Misdemeanor | Up to 1 year | $5,000 |
| Unlawful surveillance, prior conviction | Level 6 Felony | 6 months to 2.5 years | $10,000 |
| Basic voyeurism/peeping (IC 35-45-4-5) | Class B Misdemeanor | Up to 180 days | $1,000 |
| Camera-assisted voyeurism | Level 6 Felony | 6 months to 2.5 years | $10,000 |
| Public voyeurism | Class A Misdemeanor | Up to 1 year | $5,000 |
| Public voyeurism with distribution | Level 6 Felony | 6 months to 2.5 years | $10,000 |
| Aerial voyeurism (drone) | Class A Misdemeanor | Up to 1 year | $5,000 |
| Unlawful interception of communications (IC 35-33.5-5-5) | Level 5 Felony | 1 to 6 years | $10,000 |
In addition to criminal penalties, victims of illegal surveillance in Indiana may pursue civil remedies including damages, injunctive relief, and attorney's fees.
Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act (2026)
The Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act (ICDPA) took effect on January 1, 2026. While this law primarily governs how businesses collect and process consumer data online, it has implications for surveillance camera systems that collect, store, or transmit personal data.
Under the ICDPA, businesses that process the personal data of 100,000 or more Indiana consumers (or 25,000 or more consumers while deriving 50% or more of revenue from data sales) must:
- Provide clear privacy notices about data collection
- Obtain opt-in consent before processing sensitive data, including biometric data and precise geolocation data
- Allow consumers to delete their personal data and opt out of targeted advertising
Violations can result in civil penalties of up to $7,500 per violation, enforced by the Indiana Attorney General. The ICDPA does not create a private right of action.
For businesses operating camera systems that use facial recognition, license plate readers, or other biometric identification technology, compliance with the ICDPA's sensitive data provisions is essential.
Related Indiana Camera and Privacy Laws
- Indiana Recording Laws covers the consent rule that governs camera audio in Indiana.
- Indiana Security Camera Recording Rules explains the recording-law side of camera use.
- Indiana Biometric Privacy Laws addresses facial recognition and biometric data.
- Indiana Ring Doorbell Laws covers video doorbell rules in Indiana.
Common Camera Questions
These national guides answer the most common surveillance camera questions:
Frequently Asked Questions
Is it legal to have security cameras on your property in Indiana?
Yes. Indiana law allows homeowners to install security cameras on their own property for purposes such as home security, monitoring deliveries, and deterring crime. You may record video in public-facing areas and common areas of your home. You cannot place cameras in areas where others have a reasonable expectation of privacy, such as bathrooms or guest bedrooms. If your cameras also record audio, you must comply with Indiana's one-party consent law under IC 35-33.5-5-5.
Can my neighbor legally point a camera at my house in Indiana?
Generally, yes, if the camera is on their own property and captures areas visible from a public vantage point. A neighbor recording your front yard or driveway from their property is typically legal because those areas do not carry a reasonable expectation of privacy. However, if the camera is aimed to record inside your home through windows, it may violate Indiana's voyeurism statute (IC 35-45-4-5). Placing a camera directly on your property without consent violates IC 35-46-8.5-1.
Do I need to tell my nanny about a hidden camera in Indiana?
Indiana has no statute requiring you to notify a caregiver that a video-only camera is in use in a common area of your home, though telling them is still sound practice. For video-only nanny cams in common areas like living rooms and kitchens, no notice is legally required. If the camera also records audio, you should inform the caregiver in writing and obtain consent to comply with Indiana's one-party consent wiretapping law (IC 35-33.5-5-5). Written consent as part of an employment agreement is the safest approach.
What are the penalties for illegal surveillance in Indiana?
Penalties range from a Class B misdemeanor (up to 180 days in jail and $1,000 fine) for basic voyeurism to a Level 5 felony (1 to 6 years in prison and $10,000 fine) for unlawful interception of communications. Using a camera to commit voyeurism is a Level 6 felony carrying 6 months to 2.5 years in prison and up to $10,000 in fines. Placing surveillance equipment on someone else's property without consent is a Class A misdemeanor (up to 1 year in jail and $5,000 fine).
Can my employer record me at work with security cameras in Indiana?
Yes, employers in Indiana may use video surveillance in common workplace areas such as offices, hallways, production floors, and retail sales floors for legitimate business purposes including security and loss prevention. Employers cannot place cameras in areas where employees have a reasonable expectation of privacy, such as restrooms, locker rooms, and changing areas. If workplace cameras also record audio, employers should post conspicuous signage to establish constructive consent under Indiana's wiretapping law.
Updates
Corrected the wiretap section to Indiana's actual statutory language and removed two exceptions that exist only in federal law, and removed an incorrect claim that Indiana requires notifying visitors about a hidden camera.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Removed the invented list of drone-warrant exceptions (emergencies involving bodily harm, terrorist threats, missing persons) attributed to IC 35-33-5-9; the statute's only exception is that no warrant is needed when one would not be needed for the same search without a drone.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Indiana Code, TITLE 35. CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE
§ 35-46-8.5-1Unlawful photography, surveillance, and tracking on private propertyIn forcecited in 9 of our articles
Sec. 1. (a) This section does not apply to any of the following: (1) Electronic or video toll collection facilities or activities authorized under any of the following: (A) IC 8-15-2. (B) IC 8-15-3. (C) IC 8-15.5. (D) IC 8-15.7. (E) IC 8-16. (F) IC 9-21-3.5. (2) A law enforcement officer who has obtained: (A) a search warrant; or (B) the consent of the owner of private property; to place a camera, electronic surveillance equipment, or tracking device on the private property, with respect to the placement of a camera, electronic surveillance equipment, or tracking device. (3) A law enforcement officer who uses a law enforcement recording device in performance of the officer's duties, with respect to the use of the law enforcement recording device. (4) A person who uses a tracking device to determine the location of a family member (as defined in IC 35-44.1-3-1), unless the person is the subject of a protective order obtained by the family member.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at iga.in.gov
Also relied on in: Indiana Landlord-Tenant Recording Laws: Rights for Renters and Property Owners, Indiana Video Recording Laws: Surveillance Rules and Privacy Limits, Indiana Voyeurism and Hidden Camera Laws: Statutes and Penalties
§ 35-45-4-5Voyeurism; public voyeurism; aerial voyeurismIn forcecited in 14 of our articles
Sec. 5. (a) The following definitions apply throughout this section: (1) "Camera" means a camera, a video camera, a device that captures a digital image, or any other type of video recording device. (2) "Peep" means: (A) any looking of a clandestine, surreptitious, prying, or secretive nature; or (B) using a concealed camera with the intent of capturing an intimate image (as defined by IC 34-21.5-2-1). (3) "Private area" means the naked or undergarment clad genitals, pubic area, or buttocks of an individual. (b) A person: (1) who knowingly or intentionally: (A) peeps; or (B) goes upon the land of another with the intent to peep; into an occupied dwelling of another person; or (2) who knowingly or intentionally peeps in or into an area where an occupant of the area reasonably can be expected to disrobe or is actually expected to disrobe, including: (A) restrooms; (B) baths; (C) showers; and (D) dressing rooms; without the consent of the other person, commits voyeurism, a Class B misdemeanor.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at iga.in.gov
Cited in 19 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Casady v. State (2010) held restrooms and showers are areas where occupants reasonably can be expected to disrobe under 35-45-4-5, whether or not they actually did. Steven M. Sandleben v. State of Indiana (2014) read the public voyeurism definition of private area disjunctively, covering undergarment-clad or naked areas.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Casady v. State (Indiana Court of Appeals 2010, 934 N.E.2d 1181)✓A man videotaped men at urinals and in a shower while hiding in a stall and a doorway; the court affirmed his voyeurism convictions, holding the filming was a clandestine peep and that restrooms are listed places where occupants can reasonably be expected to disrobe.
- Steven M. Sandleben v. State of Indiana (Indiana Court of Appeals 2014, 22 N.E.3d 782)✓A man put a camera under a four-year-old's skort in a store and filmed two girls underwater at a pool; the court upheld his public voyeurism convictions, holding the statute reaches naked or undergarment clad areas and was not vague as applied to him.
- David Delagrange v. State of Indiana (Indiana Court of Appeals 2013, 981 N.E.2d 1227)“…e other person, commits voyeurism, a Class B misdemeanor. Ind.Code § 35-45-4-5(a) (2005). After Delagrange committed t…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Indiana Smart Glasses Recording Laws 2025, Indiana Audio Recording Laws: One-Party Consent Rules and Penalties, Indiana Medical Recording Laws: Patient Rights, HIPAA, and Provider Rules
§ 35-33-5-9Unmanned aerial vehicles; search warrant; exceptionsIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
Sec. 9. A law enforcement officer must obtain a search warrant in order to use an unmanned aerial vehicle: (1) on or over private property; or (2) to conduct a search, perform surveillance, obtain a photograph, or obtain video of private property or of individuals, items, or structures located on private property; without the consent of the owner of the affected private property. However, a warrant is not required for a use of an unmanned aerial vehicle if a warrant would not be required for a search not using an unmanned aerial vehicle.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at iga.in.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2018
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Amber Keith v. State of Indiana (Indiana Court of Appeals 2018, 91 N.E.3d 1029)“…the use of an unmanned aerial vehicle under IC 35-33-5-9. Ind. Code § 35-31.5-2-186 (20…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Indiana Drone Laws (2026): Police Warrants, Voyeurism, Hunting
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Indiana Code 35-46-8.5-1: Unlawful Photography, Surveillance, and Tracking on Private Property(law.justia.com)
- Indiana Code 35-45-4-5: Voyeurism; Public Voyeurism; Aerial Voyeurism(law.justia.com)
- Indiana Code 35-33-5-9: Unmanned Aerial Vehicles; Search Warrant(law.justia.com)
- Indiana Administrative Register: Title 68, Article 12 - Security and Surveillance(iar.iga.in.gov).gov
- Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press: Indiana Recording Guide(rcfp.org)
- Indiana Code 22-5-8: Employer Device Implantation Prohibition(jacksonlewis.com)
- Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act Overview(hunton.com)
- Hamilton County Indiana: Misdemeanor and Level 6 Felony Advisement(hamiltoncounty.in.gov).gov
- Indiana Code 35-33.5-5-5: Unlawful Interception; Classification of Offenses(iga.in.gov)
- Indiana Code 35-33.5-5-6: Immunity for Persons Assisting an Authorized Interception(iga.in.gov)
- Indiana Code 35-31.5-2-110: Definition of "Electronic Communication"(iga.in.gov)
- Indiana Code 35-31.5-2-176: Definition of "Interception"(iga.in.gov)