I Got Scammed: What to Do, How to Get Money Back, Where to Report
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited October 3, 2026). · 44 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

If you think a scam is happening right now, stop: hang up, do not click the link, and do not pay. If it already happened, call the fraud line of the company you paid through (your card issuer, bank, payment app, wire company, gift card issuer or crypto exchange) using a number you look up yourself, and ask it to stop or reverse the payment. Then report the scam to the Federal Trade Commission at ReportFraud.ftc.gov and, for anything that happened online, to the FBI at ic3.gov.
Whether the law gives you a right to get the money back depends mostly on how you paid, and on one question: did the scammer move the money, or did you send it yourself after being tricked? Credit cards and transfers a scammer made out of your bank account carry federal refund rules with fixed deadlines. Wires, gift cards, cryptocurrency and cash carry few or none, which is why speed matters so much.
Information last verified on October 2, 2026. This article has not been reviewed by a licensed lawyer.
Jurisdiction scope: This guide covers US federal law and federal agency guidance: the Electronic Fund Transfer Act and Regulation E, the Truth in Lending Act (including the Fair Credit Billing Act) and Regulation Z, the FTC's Telemarketing Sales Rule, federal criminal restitution and victims' rights statutes, and FINRA arbitration rules. Payment company policies are described as policy, not law. State law is not covered here, including state fraud lawsuits, small claims limits, state cryptocurrency ATM laws and state consumer protection statutes.
Is this a scam? The FTC's four warning signs
Most scams follow the same pattern. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) lists "Four Signs That It's a Scam" in its guide How To Avoid a Scam:
- "Scammers PRETEND to be from an organization you know."
- "Scammers say there's a PROBLEM or a PRIZE."
- "Scammers PRESSURE you to act immediately."
- "Scammers tell you to PAY in a specific way."
Pretending. Scammers pose as the government (the FTC names the FTC itself, the Social Security Administration, the IRS and Medicare), a utility, a tech company or a charity. The FTC warns that "They use technology to change the phone number that appears on your caller ID. So the name and number you see might not be real."
A problem or a prize. You owe money, you are in trouble with the government, a relative had an emergency, your computer has a virus, your account needs verifying, or you won a prize but must pay a fee to collect it.
Pressure. The FTC says scammers "might threaten to arrest you, sue you, take away your driver's or business license, or deport you." If you are on the phone, "they might tell you not to hang up so you can't check out their story."
A specific way to pay. In the FTC's words, "They often insist that you can only pay by using cryptocurrency, wiring money through a company like MoneyGram or Western Union, using a payment app, or putting money on a gift card and then giving them the numbers on the back of the card." Some send a check that "will later turn out to be fake," then ask you to deposit it and send money back.
For the specific tells and checks for a text, an email, a phone call, a website, a QR code or a social media message, see how to tell if something is a scam.
Not sure about a specific call, text or offer? The Is this a scam? checker asks a few questions and shows which warning signs match. Your answers stay in your browser.
The rule that stops most scams: contact them your own way
Hang up, do not click, and reach the company or agency through a number or website you find yourself. The FTC's advice for a message that seems to come from a company you use: "it's still best not to click on any links. Instead, contact them using a website you know is trustworthy. Or look up their phone number. Don't call a number they gave you or the number from your caller ID."
A few FTC statements work as hard stops. If you hear any of these, it is a scam:
- A request for a code. "Anyone who asks you for your account verification code is a scammer."
- Moving money to keep it safe. "Someone who says you have to move your money to protect it is a scammer. Period."
- A government official demanding money. "The FTC will never threaten you, say you must transfer your money to 'protect it,' or tell you to withdraw cash or buy gold and give it to someone. That's a scam."
- Gift cards as payment. "Only scammers will tell you to buy a gift card, like a Google Play or Apple Card, and give them the numbers off the back of the card."
- Send-back checks. "never deposit a check and send money back to someone."
The FTC also suggests stopping to tell a friend, family member or neighbor what happened before you do anything else, because "Talking about it could help you realize it's a scam."
I got scammed: what to do in the first hour
Scammers are professionals, and people of every age and background get caught. What matters now is speed. Work through these steps in order.

- Stop paying and stop talking to them. Do not send a final fee to "release" your money, and do not stay on the line while they coach you. End contact.
- Call the fraud line of the company you paid through. Use the number on the back of your card or the company's official app or website, never a number the scammer gave you. The FTC's guidance: "If you paid a scammer, your money might be gone already. But it's always worth asking the company you used to send the money if there's a way to get it back." That company is usually the one that can stop or reverse your payment; a report to a government agency does not reverse a payment by itself. Tell it a scammer tricked you, and say exactly how (for example, whether the scammer got your login or code, or whether you sent the money yourself).
- If money left by wire or bank transfer, ask for a recall and file with the FBI. The FBI's 2025 Internet Crime Report says: "If you discover a fraudulent transfer, time is of the essence. Immediately, contact your financial institution and request a recall of the funds along with any necessary indemnification documents." It adds: "Regardless of the amount lost, file a complaint at www.ic3.gov. Be sure to include the full transaction details in your report." The FBI's Recovery Asset Team helps banks and FBI field offices freeze funds; in 2025 it worked 3,900 incidents and froze $679,013,183 of $1,163,919,846 in attempted theft. Those are incidents the FBI acted on, not the odds for every victim.
- If you mailed cash, call the Postal Inspection Service. The FTC says to contact the U.S. Postal Inspection Service at 1-877-876-2455 immediately: "For a fee, they can intercept the package. This lets you redirect a domestic shipment that hasn't been delivered." For FedEx, UPS or another carrier, contact them as soon as possible.
- Secure your accounts. If you gave a scammer a password and can still log in, the FTC says to create a new, strong password (and change it anywhere else you used it) and turn on two-factor authentication. If you let a scammer into your computer, update your security software, run a scan and delete anything it flags. If you gave your Social Security number and it was used, go to IdentityTheft.gov for a recovery plan; if you are not sure, go to IdentityTheft.gov/databreach. A credit freeze is free: "There's no cost to place or lift a credit freeze, and it doesn't affect your credit score." See credit freeze vs. fraud alert.
- Report the scam. File with the FTC at ReportFraud.ftc.gov or by calling 1-877-FTC-HELP (382-4357), and with the FBI at ic3.gov for internet-enabled scams. If you are 60 or older, the Justice Department's National Elder Fraud Hotline is 833-FRAUD-11 (833-372-8311). Our guide on where to report a scam matches each type of scam to the right agency.
- Keep records. Write down dates, amounts, transaction numbers, the account the money went to, and every phone number, email address, website and screen name the scammer used. The IC3 does not take attachments, so "keep all original documents in a secure location" in case an investigating agency asks for them. Save or print your IC3 complaint before closing the page; the FBI says "This is the only time you will be able to retain a copy of your complaint."
- Expect a second scam. People who just lost money are targeted again by fake recovery services, fake lawyers and fake government agents. Read the recovery scams section below before you answer anyone who offers to help.
Watch the clocks. For a bank account or debit card, report within two business days after you learn a card or code was lost or stolen to keep your liability for unauthorized transfers at $50 or less (12 C.F.R. § 1005.6(b)(1)), and within 60 days after the statement showing an unauthorized transfer (12 C.F.R. § 1005.6(b)(3)). The $50 and $500 limits apply when a lost or stolen card or code was used; for an unauthorized transfer made without one, you owe nothing if you report within 60 days after the statement. For a credit card, your billing-error notice must be in writing and must reach the issuer at the billing-error address it discloses (usually on your statement) within 60 days after it sent the first statement showing the charge (12 C.F.R. § 1026.13(b)). A phone call is the right first step, but follow it up in writing.
Does reporting get my money back?
Not by itself. The FTC's reporting site says plainly: "We can't resolve your individual report, but we use reports to investigate and bring cases against fraud, scams, and bad business practices." The IC3 says "You will not hear from the IC3," because it "does not conduct investigations" itself; it passes reports to FBI field offices and other agencies. Reports still matter. The FTC enforces Section 5 of the FTC Act, which declares "unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce" unlawful (15 U.S.C. § 45(a)(1)), and it uses reports to "build cases against scammers," "spot trends," "educate the public" and "share data about what is happening in your community."
Can I get my money back? It depends on how you paid
The FTC organizes its own advice by payment method, because the law does. This table gives the governing rule for each method in one line. Our guide on how to get money back after a scam walks through each one in full, with the dispute steps and deadlines.
| How you paid | The rule that governs | Call first |
|---|---|---|
| Credit card | For unauthorized use, you owe no more than the lesser of $50 or what was charged before you notified the issuer (12 C.F.R. § 1026.12(b)). A charge for something not delivered as agreed is a billing error; written notice must reach the issuer at its billing-error address within 60 days after it sent the first statement showing it (12 C.F.R. § 1026.13). | The card issuer, at the number on the back of the card |
| Debit card or bank account transfer a scammer made | Regulation E: an unauthorized transfer. If a lost or stolen card or code was used, liability stays at $50 or less if you report within two business days after learning of the loss or theft. If no card or code was used, you owe nothing if you report within 60 days after the statement showing the transfer. Either way, report within 60 days after that statement (12 C.F.R. §§ 1005.6, 1005.11). | Your bank or credit union |
| Zelle or a payment app (Venmo, Cash App, PayPal) | If a scammer got into your account and sent the money, Regulation E treats it as unauthorized. If you sent the money yourself, any refund depends on the company's policy. See Zelle and payment app scams. | Your bank (for Zelle) or the app |
| Wire transfer | Regulation E excludes wires "through Fedwire or through a similar wire transfer system that is used primarily for transfers between financial institutions or between businesses" (12 C.F.R. § 1005.3(c)(3)). For money sent to someone abroad through a money transfer company, or through a bank that sends such transfers in the normal course of business, you can generally cancel within 30 minutes of paying if it has not been picked up or deposited (12 C.F.R. §§ 1005.30, 1005.34). | Your bank (ask for a recall) or the transfer company |
| Gift card | We found no federal rule requiring a refund. The FTC says some companies "might give your money back," so ask; that is issuer policy. | The gift card issuer, at the number on the back of the card |
| Cryptocurrency | The FTC says crypto payments "don't have the same legal protections as credit and debit cards do," though "some states have passed laws that might help you." | The exchange or crypto ATM operator |
| Check | A paper check is outside Regulation E's electronic-transfer rules (12 C.F.R. § 1005.3(c)(1)). If you deposited a scammer's check and sent money on, the FTC warns you can end up "stuck paying the money back to the bank." | Your bank, right away |
| Cash | For cash sent through the U.S. mail, the Postal Inspection Service can intercept an undelivered domestic package for a fee, according to the FTC. | U.S. Postal Inspection Service, 1-877-876-2455, or the carrier you used |
Did the scammer move the money, or did you send it?
Bank and app refund rights turn on one word: unauthorized. Regulation E defines it this way:
"'Unauthorized electronic fund transfer' means an electronic fund transfer from a consumer's account initiated by a person other than the consumer without actual authority to initiate the transfer and from which the consumer receives no benefit." (12 C.F.R. § 1005.2(m))
In plain words, the protection is built for money that someone else moved. Two situations follow from that.
The scammer got in and moved the money. This is unauthorized, even if you were tricked into opening the door. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) says that when "a consumer is fraudulently induced into sharing account access information with a third party, and a third party uses that information to make an EFT from the consumer's account, the transfer is an unauthorized EFT under Regulation E." Its examples include a caller "pretending to be a representative from the consumer's financial institution" who tricks the consumer into providing "their account login information, texted account confirmation code, debit card number, or other information that could be used to initiate an EFT," and a scammer who uses phishing to "observe the consumer entering account login information."
Three more CFPB answers help here. Your bank cannot hold your mistake against you: Regulation E's commentary "expressly states that negligence by the consumer cannot be used as the basis for imposing greater liability than is permissible under Regulation E." Your bank cannot make you contact the merchant first: it "must begin its investigation promptly upon receipt of an oral or written notice of error." And a payment network's rule that transfers are "final and irrevocable" does "not reduce consumer protections against liability for unauthorized EFTs."
You pressed send yourself. If you personally sent the payment, for example to a fake investment adviser or a fake seller, the transfer was initiated by you, not by "a person other than the consumer." As written, the definition generally does not reach that payment, and banks and apps often treat it as authorized. Some companies go further by policy. As of October 2026, Zelle's support page says "A scam is when you knowingly send money but do not receive what you expected in return," and that "Certain impostor scams qualify for reimbursement." That is Zelle's policy, not a legal right, and it can change.
Either way, call. Describe exactly what happened, because the facts decide which rules apply.
Common scams and where to go next
Each of these has its own guide. The short version here tells you what the scam looks like and where to go.
Scam texts, emails and calls (phishing, smishing and vishing). Phishing is the broad term for messages that try to steal your passwords, account numbers or Social Security number; smishing is phishing by text message, and vishing is phishing by voice call. The FTC reports that fake package delivery texts, "usually from someone pretending to be from the U.S. Postal Service," were the most reported text scam of 2024, and that fake toll texts imitate programs "from SunPass in Florida to FasTrak in San Francisco." The Postal Inspection Service says USPS tracking texts come only after a customer requests them with a tracking number, "and it will NOT contain a link." Forward scam texts to 7726 (SPAM), which goes to your wireless provider. Full guide: phishing, smishing and vishing.
Fake bank fraud alerts. A caller or text claiming to be your bank's fraud department says your account is at risk. The FTC describes the Zelle version: scammers "pose as your bank and tell you there's a problem with your account," then walk you through moving money into "a new account in your name," which "really belongs to the scammer." Your bank "will never contact you to tell you to transfer money or to ask for personal information or passcodes," according to the FTC. See Zelle and payment app scams.
Tech support and fake invoices. A pop-up, call or email says your computer is infected, or that you were charged hundreds of dollars to renew a subscription using names like "Geek Squad, McAfee, and Norton." The FTC says "Legitimate tech companies won't contact you by phone, email, or text message to tell you there's a problem with your computer," and "Real security pop-up warnings and messages will never ask you to call a phone number." Full guide: tech support and fake invoice scams.
Zelle, Venmo, Cash App and PayPal scams. Fake sellers, overpayments, payments sent by mistake and the send-money-to-yourself trick. See Zelle and payment app scams.
AI voice clones and deepfake calls. The FBI warns that "malicious actors are more frequently exploiting AI-generated audio to impersonate well-known, public figures or personal relations to increase the believability of their schemes." See AI voice scam calls and deepfake fraud and impersonation laws.
Investment scams. These caused the largest reported losses to the FTC in 2025, over $7.9 billion. If a brokerage firm or broker was involved, see the FINRA section further down this page. Full guide: crypto and investment scams.
Notario and immigration fraud. Immigrants are targeted by people who falsely offer immigration legal help. See notario fraud.
Scams aimed at Spanish speakers. See phone scams targeting Spanish speakers.
Government impersonators. A caller, text or letter claims to be from Social Security, the IRS, Medicare or the police and says you must pay or move money to avoid arrest or protect your account. Full guide: government impersonation scams.
Romance scams. Someone you met online or through a dating app builds a relationship, then asks for money or steers you into an investment. Full guide: romance scams.
Gift card payments. Anyone who tells you to pay a bill, a fine or a debt with gift cards is running a scam. Full guide: gift card scams.
Prize, lottery and sweepstakes notices. A message says you won, but you must pay a fee or taxes first. Full guide: sweepstakes and lottery scams.
Job offers and paid online tasks. A recruiter offers easy work, then asks you to pay to unlock earnings or to deposit a check and send money back. Full guide: job and task scams.
Rental listings. A home or apartment is advertised by someone who does not control it and asks for an application fee, deposit or rent before you have met anyone or been given a lease you can check. Full guide: rental scams.
Sextortion. Someone threatens to share intimate images unless you pay or send more images. Full guide: sextortion scams.
Scams against older adults. For reporting routes, Adult Protective Services and what families can do, see elder fraud.
Grandparent and family emergency calls. A call or message says a grandchild or other relative is in trouble, or claims to be holding a loved one, and wants money fast, sometimes collected by a courier who comes to your door. Full guide: grandparent and family emergency scams.
Utility shutoff threats. A caller or visitor says your power, gas or water will be cut off unless you pay right away. Full guide: utility scams.
Home repair and contractor offers. Someone at the door offers repairs, often after a storm, and wants everything paid up front. Full guide: home repair and contractor scams.
Medicare and health insurance. Someone offers free tests, braces or medical supplies in exchange for your Medicare number, or your Marketplace plan is changed without your permission. Full guide: Medicare and health insurance scams.
Online shopping and marketplace deals. A website or seller takes your money and never ships, or a buyer on Facebook Marketplace or Craigslist uses a fake payment or overpayment trick. Full guide: online shopping and marketplace scams.
Fake charities and disaster relief. After a disaster or a mass casualty event, scammers ask for donations or pose as relief agencies. Full guide: charity and disaster scams.
Debt relief, student loan and credit repair offers. A company promises to settle your debts, get your student loans forgiven or repair your credit, and wants a fee first. Full guide: debt relief and student loan scams.
Stolen mail and washed checks. A check you mailed is stolen, then altered or copied and cashed. Full guide: mail theft and check washing.
Identity theft. If a scammer got your Social Security number or opened accounts in your name, see our identity theft guide and how to report identity theft. If a scammer has your Social Security number, bank login or card number but nothing has happened yet, see what to do if a scammer has your information.
Fake settlement notices. A message about a class-action settlement can be fake. Before you file a claim or share information, check the link with our settlement notice verifier and look the case up in our data breach settlement tracker.
Robocalls and spam texts. For the federal law on unwanted calls and texts, see our TCPA guide.
Being asked to receive and forward money. Someone asks you to accept money into your account and pass it on. The FBI says these recruiters "often target the elderly, students, those looking for work, or those on dating websites," and warns that "Acting as a money mule is illegal and punishable, even if you aren't aware you're committing a crime," and that "you may be held personally liable for repaying money lost by victims." If you suspect it, the FBI says to stop communicating, stop transferring money, notify your bank and the service you used, and report to IC3. Full guide: money mule and fake check scams.
Watch out for recovery scams (including fake lawyers)
The FTC calls refund and recovery scams "the worst of the worst: scams that target people who have already lost money to a scam." The pattern: "Scammers buy lists of people who've paid scammers. They call it a 'sucker list.'" Then someone calls, emails, texts or messages you claiming they can get your money back. The scammer "may say they're with a government agency, a consumer advocacy group, a law firm, or some other organization," and asks for a "retainer fee," "processing fee," "administrative charge," "tax" or "shipment and handling charge."
The FTC's test is short: "Did someone contact you and ask for an upfront fee? That's a scammer." It adds that "Government agencies and legitimate organizations will never ask for money to help you get a refund. They will never ask for your financial account numbers or other personal information and will not guarantee that you'll get your money back." And: "Don't deposit a refund check for more money than you lost."
Fake law firms. The FBI has issued repeated warnings about fictitious law firms targeting cryptocurrency scam victims. Its June 2024 alert says "fraudsters posing as lawyers representing fictitious law firms may contact scam victims and offer their services, claiming to have the authorization to investigate fund recovery cases," and that victims reported losses "totaling over $9.9 million" to them between February 2023 and February 2024. It also says: "Law enforcement does not charge victims a fee for investigating crimes." The FBI's August 2025 alert adds:
- "There are no law firms which are officially authorized partners of US Government agencies."
- "The US Government does not request payment for law enforcement services provided."
- Warning signs include a caller "Having knowledge of the exact amounts and dates of previous wire transfers," and "An unwillingness or inability to provide credentials or a license, not appearing on camera, and not conducting video meetings."
- "Request video verification or documentation or a photo of their law license. If this cannot be readily provided, assume they are not legitimate."
Fake agencies. The IC3 warns that scammers impersonate it: "The IC3 does not work with any non-law enforcement entity, such as law firms or crypto services, to recuperate lost funds or investigate cases. The IC3 will never directly contact you for information or money." The Justice Department reports scammers "claiming to be from the National Elder Fraud Hotline and threatening to file suits" against the people they call.
What federal rules say. The Telemarketing Sales Rule makes it an abusive practice for a seller or telemarketer to charge for recovery services before the money comes back:
"Requesting or receiving payment of any fee or consideration from a person for goods or services represented to recover or otherwise assist in the return of money or any other item of value paid for by, or promised to, that person in a previous transaction, until seven (7) business days after such money or other item is delivered to that person. This provision shall not apply to goods or services provided to a person by a licensed attorney;" (16 C.F.R. § 310.4(a)(3))
Two limits matter. The rule exempts goods or services "provided to a person by a licensed attorney," so it does not stop a real lawyer from charging a fee. And it covers telemarketing, which the rule defines as a campaign "conducted to induce the purchase of goods or services or a charitable contribution, by use of one or more telephones and which involves more than one interstate telephone call" (16 C.F.R. § 310.2), so it may not reach every pitch. The FTC's advice applies whatever the channel: "No matter how someone unexpectedly contacts you" (it lists mail, online, telephone, social media and text message), "don't pay upfront."
If you lost money to a recovery scam, the FTC says to report it at ReportFraud.ftc.gov and to your state attorney general.
When a lawyer helps after a scam, and when one does not
Most people who lose a few hundred or a few thousand dollars to a scammer they cannot identify will usually not get value from hiring a lawyer. The steps that actually move money are the payment dispute and the fast reports above, and none of them requires a lawyer. A lawsuit against the scammer runs under state law (not covered here) and needs a defendant you can identify and serve, and a court judgment against someone you cannot find does not put money back in your account. Our guide to when a lawyer helps after a scam goes through each situation in more detail.

Government agencies will not act as your lawyer either. The SEC, for example, says that "the SEC cannot act as an investor's attorney or personal representative."
Counsel can matter in a few situations.
Your bank or card issuer will not follow the rules
If your bank has already said no, start with what to do when your bank refuses a scam refund.
If a bank, credit union or payment app refuses a valid unauthorized-transfer claim, or a card issuer ignores the billing-error rules, federal law gives you a claim against that company. Under the Electronic Fund Transfer Act, a person who fails to comply is liable for "any actual damage sustained by such consumer as a result of such failure," statutory damages in an individual action of "not less than $100 nor greater than $1,000," and, "in the case of any successful action to enforce the foregoing liability, the costs of the action, together with a reasonable attorney's fee as determined by the court" (15 U.S.C. § 1693m(a)). That section excludes "an error resolved in accordance with section 1693f," and a lawsuit must be filed "within one year from the date of the occurrence of the violation" (15 U.S.C. § 1693m(g)).
The Truth in Lending Act, which includes the Fair Credit Billing Act's billing-error rules, similarly makes a creditor that fails to comply liable for "any actual damage sustained by such person as a result of the failure," plus statutory damages and, "in the case of any successful action to enforce the foregoing liability ..., the costs of the action, together with a reasonable attorney's fee as determined by the court" (15 U.S.C. § 1640(a)), with suit due "within one year from the date of the occurrence of the violation" (15 U.S.C. § 1640(e)).
Because a consumer who wins is awarded costs and a reasonable attorney's fee, these claims can make sense even when the loss is modest. They are claims against a company that broke the rules, not a general right to be repaid for any scam. Before you get there, ask the bank for its written explanation and the documents it relied on, which Regulation E requires it to provide on request (12 C.F.R. § 1005.11(d)(1)), and consider a complaint to the CFPB at consumerfinance.gov/complaint. The CFPB sends complaints to companies for a response and says "Most companies respond within 15 days." Mind the one-year limits while you wait.
Investment fraud involving a brokerage firm or broker
If your loss involved a brokerage firm or one of its brokers, FINRA arbitration may be available. FINRA Rule 12200 requires arbitration when it is "Required by a written agreement" or "Requested by the customer," the dispute "is between a customer and a member or associated person of a member," and it "arises in connection with the business activities of the member or the associated person." That means FINRA is not a route against a crypto website or a person who is not a FINRA member firm or associated person.
Timing is limited. Under FINRA Rule 12206, "No claim shall be eligible for submission to arbitration under the Code where six years have elapsed from the occurrence or event giving rise to the claim," and the rule "does not extend applicable statutes of limitations."
FINRA says "You should consider hiring an attorney to represent you during FINRA arbitration or mediation proceedings," but its staff "cannot endorse or recommend a specific attorney." For people who cannot afford a lawyer, FINRA lists law school securities arbitration clinics that represent "parties who lack the means to hire an attorney and who have smaller claims." The SEC likewise notes that "a law school arbitration/mediation clinic may be able to help you resolve a securities-related dispute free of charge."
Older adults and financial exploitation
Federal elder justice law defines an "elder" as "an individual age 60 or older," and "exploitation" as "the fraudulent or otherwise illegal, unauthorized, or improper act or process of an individual, including a caregiver or fiduciary, that uses the resources of an elder for monetary or personal benefit, profit, or gain, or that results in depriving an elder of rightful access to, or use of, benefits, resources, belongings, or assets" (42 U.S.C. § 1397j).
Two free routes come before any lawyer:
- National Elder Fraud Hotline: 833-FRAUD-11 (833-372-8311), Monday through Friday, 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. eastern time, with English, Spanish and other languages. The Justice Department says "You will reach a case manager who will help you through the reporting process at the federal, state, and local levels."
- Adult Protective Services: a federal fact sheet describes APS as "a social service program authorized by law in every state to receive and investigate reports of elder or vulnerable adult maltreatment and to intervene to protect the victims to the extent possible." APS "can differ from state to state and even from county to county," so whether a scam by a stranger qualifies depends on your state. Find your office through NAPSA's help in your area page or the Eldercare Locator at 1-800-677-1116.
When the person who took the money is someone the older adult knows, such as a caregiver or fiduciary (both named in the definition above), the wrongdoer can be identified, which is when a lawyer is more likely to help.
Immigration-related fraud
The Justice Department's immigration court agency (EOIR) explains that "Federal regulations at 8 C.F.R. § 1292.1(a)(4) allow non-attorney 'Accredited Representatives' to represent aliens before the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR)." EOIR publishes a recognition and accreditation roster. If someone who offered immigration help took your money, see our guide to notario fraud.
Criminal cases: restitution and victims' rights
Many scams are federal crimes. The wire fraud statute makes it a crime to transmit communications "by means of wire, radio, or television communication in interstate or foreign commerce" to carry out "any scheme or artifice to defraud," punishable by fines and up to 20 years in prison, or up to 30 years when it affects a financial institution or involves disaster or emergency benefits (18 U.S.C. § 1343). Two federal laws give victims rights in those cases, whether or not they hire a lawyer.
- Restitution. When it sentences a defendant convicted of an offense "committed by fraud or deceit" in which "an identifiable victim or victims has suffered a physical injury or pecuniary loss," a federal court "shall order" restitution to the victim (18 U.S.C. § 3663A(a)(1), (c)(1)). This requires a conviction or a qualifying plea agreement, and the court may skip it where "the number of identifiable victims is so large as to make restitution impracticable" or where complex issues of fact would unduly prolong sentencing (18 U.S.C. § 3663A(c)(3)). An order to pay is not the same as payment.
- Victims' rights. The Crime Victims' Rights Act gives federal crime victims "The right to full and timely restitution as provided in law," "The reasonable right to confer with the attorney for the Government in the case," and "The right to reasonable, accurate, and timely notice of any public court proceeding" (18 U.S.C. § 3771(a)). The victim, the victim's lawful representative and the prosecutor may assert these rights (18 U.S.C. § 3771(d)(1)).
These rights depend on prosecutors bringing a case, which is one more reason to report.
How to find a lawyer or free legal help
- Lawyer referral services: the American Bar Association points to public-service lawyer referral services that help you find a lawyer.
- Legal aid: the Legal Services Corporation funds 129 legal aid organizations serving low-income Americans in every state, the District of Columbia and the territories, and its site lets you search for one near you. Ask whether they handle your kind of problem.
- Securities disputes: law school arbitration clinics, through FINRA's list (above).
Choose a lawyer you found yourself. The Telemarketing Sales Rule's limit on recovery fees does not apply to licensed attorneys, so a fee alone does not tell you who is real; who contacted whom is a better signal.
Lawyers and law firms that contact you first
Treat an unexpected offer from a lawyer or "recovery firm" as a warning sign. The FBI says: "Be cautious of law firms contacting you unexpectedly, especially if you have not reported the crime to any law enforcement or civil protection agencies." Its alert also flags anyone "Referring victims to a 'crypto recovery law firm,'" and anyone asking for payment "in cryptocurrency or prepaid gift cards." If you are approached, report it to the FBI at ic3.gov.
How common are scams? The 2025 numbers
FTC. "In 2025, the FTC received 3 million fraud reports from consumers, who reported $15.9 billion in losses," up from 2.6 million reports and over $12 billion the year before. Impostor scams were the most reported fraud, with more than 1 million reports and more than $3.5 billion in reported losses, while consumers "reported losing the most money ($7.9 billion) to investment scams in 2025."
FBI. The FBI's Internet Crime Complaint Center received 1,008,597 complaints in 2025 reporting $20.877 billion in losses, a 26% increase in losses from 2024, with an average loss of $20,699. "Investment-related fraud was once again the largest component of these losses, followed by business email compromises and tech support scams." People 60 and older filed 201,266 complaints reporting $7.7 billion in losses.
These are separate, self-reported datasets, so the two totals should not be added together, and neither counts every scam. The FTC says reported losses "are just a fraction of American consumers' actual losses since not every consumer who lost money to scams reported it to the FTC."
Help in Spanish (ayuda en español)
- Report fraud: ReporteFraude.ftc.gov is the FTC's Spanish-language reporting site.
- FTC guides in Spanish: Cómo evitar una estafa and Qué hacer si lo estafaron.
- Identity theft: RobodeIdentidad.gov is the Spanish version of IdentityTheft.gov.
- Fraud against people 60 and older: the National Elder Fraud Hotline, 833-372-8311, has Spanish available.
See also our guides to phone scams targeting Spanish speakers and notario fraud.
Scam and fraud laws by state
The federal refund and reporting rules on this page apply in every state. Your state adds its own layer: an attorney general or consumer office that takes complaints, a consumer protection law that may let you sue a business that deceived you (each law sets its own conditions, which depending on the state can include a loss of money or property, a purchase for personal, family or household use, or a written demand before you sue), protections for older adults and, in some states, rules for crypto ATMs.
The table below summarizes where to complain and the right to sue in each state guide we have published, with a link to the statute or official page each entry rests on. Each state name links to its full guide.
State-by-state comparison
Each state guide below is paired with the governing statute our editors adjudicated for it, held in our own legal record and verified against the official source.
Each statute shown is the same adjudicated anchor its state guide renders, independently verified against primary sources. A dash means not yet adjudicated in our record — never that no law exists.
Related guides
- How to get money back after a scam: your rights by payment method
- Where to report a scam
- Phishing, smishing and vishing: what to do if you clicked
- Tech support and fake invoice scams
- Zelle and payment app scams
- What to do when your bank refuses a scam refund
- When a lawyer helps after a scam
- Government impersonation scams, romance scams, gift card scams and crypto and investment scams
- Sweepstakes and lottery scams, job and task scams, rental scams and sextortion scams
- Money mule and fake check scams and elder fraud
- What to do if a scammer has your information
- Identity theft laws and credit freeze vs. fraud alert
- AI voice scam calls
- What to do after a data breach
- Personal privacy action plan
Last updated: October 2, 2026.
Disclaimer: This guide provides general legal information about US federal law as verified on October 2, 2026. It is not legal advice, and company policies described here can change at any time. For your specific situation, contact your bank, card issuer or payment company, the agency named above, or a lawyer licensed in your state.
Frequently Asked Questions
I got scammed. What should I do first?
Stop paying and stop contact, then call the fraud line of the company you paid through, using a number you look up yourself, and ask it to stop or reverse the payment. Then report to the FTC at ReportFraud.ftc.gov and, for online scams, to the FBI at ic3.gov.
How can I tell if something is a scam?
The FTC's four signs: the person pretends to be from an organization you know, says there is a problem or a prize, pressures you to act immediately, and tells you to pay in a specific way, such as a gift card, wire, cryptocurrency or payment app.
Can I get my money back after a scam?
It depends on how you paid. Credit card charges and bank or debit transfers a scammer made without your authority have federal protections under Regulation Z and Regulation E; wires, gift cards, cryptocurrency and cash usually depend on speed and the company's own policy.
Will my bank refund money I sent to a scammer myself?
Not necessarily. Regulation E's definition of an unauthorized transfer covers transfers initiated by a person other than the consumer (12 C.F.R. § 1005.2(m)), so banks often treat your own payment as authorized. Some companies reimburse certain impostor scams by policy, so ask.
Does reporting a scam to the FTC get my money back?
No. The FTC's reporting site says it cannot resolve individual reports but uses them to investigate and bring cases. Getting money back runs through the company you paid, and for wires, a fast IC3 complaint can help the FBI work with banks to freeze funds.
Is a company offering to recover my scam losses legitimate?
The FTC says anyone who contacts you and asks for an upfront fee to recover lost money is a scammer. The Telemarketing Sales Rule bars telemarketers from charging for recovery until seven business days after the money is delivered, except for licensed attorneys (16 C.F.R. § 310.4(a)(3)).
Do I need a lawyer after being scammed?
Usually not for a small loss to a scammer you cannot identify. A lawyer can matter if a bank or card issuer will not follow federal error rules, since the EFTA and the Truth in Lending Act award costs and a reasonable attorney's fee in a successful action, and suits must be filed within one year (15 U.S.C. §§ 1693m, 1640).
Can I sue my bank for not refunding a fraudulent transfer?
If the bank failed to comply with the Electronic Fund Transfer Act, it is liable for actual damages, statutory damages of $100 to $1,000 in an individual action, and, in a successful action, costs and a reasonable attorney's fee, with suit due within one year of the violation (15 U.S.C. § 1693m).
Where can older adults get help after a scam?
The Justice Department's National Elder Fraud Hotline, 833-FRAUD-11 (833-372-8311), helps people report fraud against anyone age 60 or older, Monday through Friday, 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. eastern time, in English, Spanish and other languages. Adult Protective Services is another route in every state.
Can I report a scam in Spanish?
Yes. The FTC's Spanish reporting site is ReporteFraude.ftc.gov, its Spanish identity theft site is RobodeIdentidad.gov, and the National Elder Fraud Hotline offers Spanish.
Updates
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Code of Federal Regulations Title 12
§ 1005.2Definitions.In forcecited in 9 of our articles
Except as otherwise provided in subpart B, for purposes of this part, the following definitions apply: (a)(1) “Access device” means a card, code, or other means of access to a consumer's account, or any combination thereof, that may be used by the consumer to initiate electronic fund transfers. (2) An access device becomes an “accepted access device” when the consumer: (i) Requests and receives, or signs, or uses (or authorizes another to use) the access device to transfer money between accounts or to obtain money, property, or services; (ii) Requests validation of an access device issued on an unsolicited basis; or (iii) Receives an access device in renewal of, or in substitution for, an accepted access device from either the financial institution that initially issued the device or a successor. (b)(1) “Account” means a demand deposit (checking), savings, or other consumer asset account (other than an occasional or incidental credit balance in a credit plan) held directly or indirectly by a financial institution and established primarily for personal, family, or household purposes.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ecfr.gov
Cited in 25 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Courts apply the § 1005.2 definitions to decide whether an account falls under the EFTA. In Yagoub Mohamed v. Bank of America (2024), the Fourth Circuit held pandemic benefits on a bank-issued prepaid card sat in a government benefit account; Brown v. Stored Value Cards (2020) found 'account' plausibly reached a jail release card.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Danica Brown v. Stored Value Cards, Inc. (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2020, 953 F.3d 567)“…ndants note that the regulation implementing section 1693i, 12 C.F.R. § 1005.2, was amended recently to state that “[t…”
- Yagoub Mohamed v. Bank of America, N.A. (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit 2024, 93 F.4th 205)“…tions” further defining “account” are published at 12 C.F.R. § 1005.2(b)(1). Those provisions are contained i…”
- Warner v. Tinder Inc. (District Court, C.D. California 2015, 105 F. Supp. 3d 1083)“…d in advance to recur at substantially regular intervals.” 12 C.F.R. § 1005.2 (k). “Written authorization” from the c…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: How to Get Money Back After a Scam: Your Rights by Payment Method, Zelle, Venmo, Cash App and PayPal Scams: Can You Get Money Back?, Phishing, Smishing and Vishing: Spot Them and What to Do If You Clicked
§ 1005.6Liability of consumer for unauthorized transfers.In forcecited in 6 of our articles
(a) Conditions for liability. A consumer may be held liable, within the limitations described in paragraph (b) of this section, for an unauthorized electronic fund transfer involving the consumer's account only if the financial institution has provided the disclosures required by § 1005.7(b)(1), (2), and (3). If the unauthorized transfer involved an access device, it must be an accepted access device and the financial institution must have provided a means to identify the consumer to whom it was issued. (b) Limitations on amount of liability. A consumer's liability for an unauthorized electronic fund transfer or a series of related unauthorized transfers shall be determined as follows: (1) Timely notice given. If the consumer notifies the financial institution within two business days after learning of the loss or theft of the access device, the consumer's liability shall not exceed the lesser of $50 or the amount of unauthorized transfers that occur before notice to the financial institution. (2) Timely notice not given.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ecfr.gov
Cited in 7 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):In Widjaja v. JPMorgan Chase Bank (2021), the Ninth Circuit applied the 60-day rule reflected in § 1005.6(b)(3): late reporters owe later transfers only if the bank shows the delay caused them, but a suing consumer must plead facts they would have occurred anyway. Trang v. JPMorgan Chase Bank (2023) dismissed such claims on that basis.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Margaretha Widjaja v. Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2021, 21 F.4th 579)“…A ordinarily requires. See 15 U.S.C. §§ 1693f(a), 1693g(a); 12 C.F.R. § 1005.6(b)(3). 1 In June 2019, Widjaja fil…”
- Nelipa v. TD Bank, N.A. (District Court, E.D. New York 2024)“…ed electronic fund transfer[s].” 15 U.S.C. § 1693f(f)(1); 12 C.F.R. § 1005.6. The term “unauthorized electronic fund…”
- Trang v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (District Court, D. Oregon 2023)“…rs occurring outside the 60-day period.” Id. at 583 (citing 12 C.F.R. § 1005.6(b)(3); 12 C.F.R. pt. 1005, Supp. I, 6(b…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: A Scammer Has My Information: What They Can Do and How to Fix It, Bank Refused Your Scam Refund? How to Challenge a Fraud Claim Denial
§ 1005.11Procedures for resolving errors.In forcecited in 9 of our articles
(a) Definition of error —(1) Types of transfers or inquiries covered. The term “error” means: (i) An unauthorized electronic fund transfer; (ii) An incorrect electronic fund transfer to or from the consumer's account; (iii) The omission of an electronic fund transfer from a periodic statement; (iv) A computational or bookkeeping error made by the financial institution relating to an electronic fund transfer; (v) The consumer's receipt of an incorrect amount of money from an electronic terminal; (vi) An electronic fund transfer not identified in accordance with § 1005.9 or § 1005.10(a); or (vii) The consumer's request for documentation required by § 1005.9 or § 1005.10(a) or for additional information or clarification concerning an electronic fund transfer, including a request the consumer makes to determine whether an error exists under paragraphs (a)(1)(i) through (vi) of this section. (2) Types of inquiries not covered. The term “error” does not include: (i) A routine inquiry about the consumer's account balance; (ii) A request for information for tax or other recordkeeping purposes; or (iii) A request for duplicate copies of documentation.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ecfr.gov
Cited in 23 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Machinski (District Court, D. Utah 2026)“…entified by the financial institution or the consumer. See 12 C.F.R. § 1005.11. Regulation E provides a closed list of…”
- Sundahl (District Court, S.D. California 2026)“…notice requirements.” Id.; see 15 U.S.C. 20 § 1693f(a); 12 C.F.R. § 1005.11(b).…”
- Hubbard v. Chime Financial, Inc. (District Court, S.D. Ohio 2025)“…had failed to allege “which investigatory obligation under 12 C.F.R. § 1005.11(c) Huntington violated.” Lumbus, 2025 W…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 1026.12Special credit card provisions.In forcecited in 6 of our articles
(a) Issuance of credit cards. Regardless of the purpose for which a credit card is to be used, including business, commercial, or agricultural use, no credit card shall be issued to any person except: (1) In response to an oral or written request or application for the card; or (2) As a renewal of, or substitute for, an accepted credit card. (b) Liability of cardholder for unauthorized use —(1)(i) Definition of unauthorized use. For purposes of this section, the term “unauthorized use” means the use of a credit card by a person, other than the cardholder, who does not have actual, implied, or apparent authority for such use, and from which the cardholder receives no benefit. (ii) Limitation on amount. The liability of a cardholder for unauthorized use of a credit card shall not exceed the lesser of $50 or the amount of money, property, labor, or services obtained by the unauthorized use before notification to the card issuer under paragraph (b)(3) of this section. (2) Conditions of liability.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ecfr.gov
Cited in 12 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Strubel v. Comenity Bank (Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit 2016, 842 F.3d 181)“…extension of credit.” The official staff interpretation of 12 C.F.R. § 1026.12(c)(1), the portion of Regulation Z impl…”
- William Krieger v. Bank of America NA (Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2018, 890 F.3d 429)“…he cardholder previously the “maximum potential liability,” 12 C.F.R. § 1026.12(b)(2)(ii), and a means by which the car…”
- William Lyons v. PNC Bank, N.A. (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit 2024)“…e cardholder held on deposit with the card issuer. 12 C.F.R. § 1026.12(d)(1). 2 In January 200…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 1026.13Billing error resolution.In forcecited in 5 of our articles
(a) Definition of billing error. For purposes of this section, the term billing error means: (1) A reflection on or with a periodic statement of an extension of credit that is not made to the consumer or to a person who has actual, implied, or apparent authority to use the consumer's credit card or open-end credit plan. (2) A reflection on or with a periodic statement of an extension of credit that is not identified in accordance with the requirements of §§ 1026.7(a)(2) or (b)(2), as applicable, and 1026.8. (3) A reflection on or with a periodic statement of an extension of credit for property or services not accepted by the consumer or the consumer's designee, or not delivered to the consumer or the consumer's designee as agreed. (4) A reflection on a periodic statement of the creditor's failure to credit properly a payment or other credit issued to the consumer's account. (5) A reflection on a periodic statement of a computational or similar error of an accounting nature that is made by the creditor. (6) A reflection on a periodic statement of an extension of credit for which the consumer requests additional clarification, including documentary evidence.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ecfr.gov
Cited in 21 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- William Krieger v. Bank of America NA (Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2018, 890 F.3d 429)“…on of Regulation Z as promulgated by the CFPB is located at 12 C.F.R. § 1026.13, a materially identical regulation, to…”
- Strubel v. Comenity Bank (Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit 2016, 842 F.3d 181)“…three business days before the scheduled payment date. See 12 C.F.R. § 1026.13(d)(1). Thus, disclosure of this righ…”
- Williams v. Capital One Bank, N.A. (District Court, District of Columbia 2025)“…deral law. Compare Compl. at 47, with 15 U.S.C. § 1666 and 12 C.F.R. § 1026.13 (requiring creditors to investigate and…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 1005.3Coverage.In forcecited in 3 of our articles
(a) General. This part applies to any electronic fund transfer that authorizes a financial institution to debit or credit a consumer's account. Generally, this part applies to financial institutions. For purposes of §§ 1005.3(b)(2) and (3), 1005.10(b), (d), and (e), 1005.13, and 1005.20, this part applies to any person, other than a person excluded from coverage of this part by section 1029 of the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010, Title X of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, Pub. L. 111-203, 124 Stat. 1376. The requirements of subpart B apply to remittance transfer providers. (b) Electronic fund transfer —(1) Definition. The term “electronic fund transfer” means any transfer of funds that is initiated through an electronic terminal, telephone, computer, or magnetic tape for the purpose of ordering, instructing, or authorizing a financial institution to debit or credit a consumer's account.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ecfr.gov
Cited in 15 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Costoso v. Bank of America, N.A. (District Court, E.D. New York 2015, 74 F. Supp. 3d 558)“…consumer deposit accounts are subject to Regulation E. See 12 C.F.R. 1005.3(a)(Regulation E encompasses “any electr…”
- Johnson, et al. v. People's United Bank, N.A. (District Court, D. New Hampshire 2016, 2016 DNH 206)“…thdrawals and transactions. See 15 U.S.C. § 1693a; see also 12 CFR § 1005.3(b). However, Johnson does not allege, a…”
- Machinski (District Court, D. Utah 2026)“…s defined by EFTA. Electronic fund transfers are defined in 12 C.F.R. § 1005.3(b).1 12 C.F.R. § 1005.3(c) details whi…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 1005.34Procedures for cancellation and refund of remittance transfers.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
(a) Sender right of cancellation and refund. Except as provided in § 1005.36(c), a remittance transfer provider shall comply with the requirements of this section with respect to any oral or written request to cancel a remittance transfer from the sender that is received by the provider no later than 30 minutes after the sender makes payment in connection with the remittance transfer if: (1) The request to cancel enables the provider to identify the sender's name and address or telephone number and the particular transfer to be cancelled; and (2) The transferred funds have not been picked up by the designated recipient or deposited into an account of the designated recipient. (b) Time limits and refund requirements. A remittance transfer provider shall refund, at no additional cost to the sender, the total amount of funds provided by the sender in connection with a remittance transfer, including any fees and, to the extent not prohibited by law, taxes imposed in connection with the remittance transfer, within three business days of receiving a sender's request to cancel the remittance transfer.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ecfr.gov
§ 1005.30Remittance transfer definitions.In force
Except as otherwise provided, for purposes of this subpart, the following definitions apply: (a) “Agent” means an agent, authorized delegate, or person affiliated with a remittance transfer provider, as defined under State or other applicable law, when such agent, authorized delegate, or affiliate acts for that remittance transfer provider. (b) “Business day” means any day on which the offices of a remittance transfer provider are open to the public for carrying on substantially all business functions. (c) “Designated recipient” means any person specified by the sender as the authorized recipient of a remittance transfer to be received at a location in a foreign country. (d) “Preauthorized remittance transfer” means a remittance transfer authorized in advance to recur at substantially regular intervals. (e) Remittance transfer —(1) General definition. A “remittance transfer” means the electronic transfer of funds requested by a sender to a designated recipient that is sent by a remittance transfer provider.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ecfr.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2018
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Lower E. Side People's Fed. Credit Union v. Trump (District Court, S.D. Illinois 2018, 289 F. Supp. 3d 568)“…in 2012 the Bureau promulgated the Remittance Rule. See 12 C.F.R. §§ 1005.30 - 1005.36. The Remittance Rule impose…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
United States Code Title 15
§ 45Unfair methods of competition unlawful; prevention by CommissionIn forcecited in 20 of our articles
Unfair methods of competition in or affecting commerce, and unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce, are hereby declared unlawful. The Commission is hereby empowered and directed to prevent persons, partnerships, or corporations, except banks, savings and loan institutions described in section 57a(f)(3) of this title, Federal credit unions described in section 57a(f)(4) of this title, common carriers subject to the Acts to regulate commerce, air carriers and foreign air carriers subject to part A of subtitle VII of title 49, and persons, partnerships, or corporations insofar as they are subject to the Packers and Stockyards Act, 1921, as amended [7 U.S.C. 181 et seq.], except as provided in section 406(b) of said Act [7 U.S.C. 227(b) ], from using unfair methods of competition in or affecting commerce and unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 3,207 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):United States v. Philadelphia National Bank (1963) applied the bank exclusion in 15 U.S.C. 45(a)(6) when construing Clayton Act section 7, and Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp. (1984) noted that a corporation and its wholly owned subsidiaries remain subject to section 5 of the FTC Act.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc. (Supreme Court of the United States 1992, 504 U.S. 374)“…etition in commerce.” 38 Stat. 719 , codified as amended, 15 U. S. C. § 45 (a)(1). That type of prohibition is ent…”
- Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp. (Supreme Court of the United States 1984, 467 U.S. 752)“…d § 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 38 Stat. 719 , 15 U. S. C. §45 . That these statutes are adequate to c…”
- Bowen v. Massachusetts (Supreme Court of the United States 1988, 487 U.S. 879)“…n required to exhaust before coming into court. See 15 U. S. C. §45 (c) (1940 ed.); 29 U. S. C. § 160 (f)…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Where to Report a Scam: Which Agency, and Can You Get Money Back?, Tech Support Scams and Fake Invoices: Geek Squad, McAfee, PayPal, FTC Fines Travel App Hopper $35 Million Over Hidden "Junk Fees"
§ 1693mCivil liabilityIn forcecited in 4 of our articles
Except as otherwise provided by this section and section 1693h of this title, any person who fails to comply with any provision of this subchapter with respect to any consumer, except for an error resolved in accordance with section 1693f of this title, is liable to such consumer in an amount equal to the sum of— any actual damage sustained by such consumer as a result of such failure; in the case of an individual action, an amount not less than $100 nor greater than $1,000; or in the case of a class action, such amount as the court may allow, except that (i) as to each member of the class no minimum recovery shall be applicable, and (ii) the total recovery under this subparagraph in any class action or series of class actions arising out of the same failure to comply by the same person shall not be more than the lesser of $500,000 or 1 per centum of the net worth of the defendant; and in the case of any successful action to enforce the foregoing liability, the costs of the action, together with a reasonable attorney’s fee as determined by the court.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 183 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Marx v. General Revenue Corp. (Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit 2011, 668 F.3d 1174)“…employees claiming to have been punished for jury service); 15 U.S.C. § 1693m(f) (awarding attorney’s fees to defenda…”
- David Hughes v. Kore of Indiana Enterprise Inc (Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit 2013, 731 F.3d 672)“…damages of at least $100 but not more than $1000. 15 U.S.C. §§ 1693m(a)(1), (a)(2)(A). If a class actio…”
- Wike v. Vertrue, Inc. (Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit 2009, 566 F.3d 590)“…one year from the date of the occurrence of the violation," 15 U.S.C. § 1693m(g), and the question here is when the a…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 1640Civil liabilityIn forcecited in 4 of our articles
Except as otherwise provided in this section, any creditor who fails to comply with any requirement imposed under this part, including any requirement under section 1635 of this title, subsection (f) or (g) of section 1641 of this title, or part D or E of this subchapter with respect to any person is liable to such person in an amount equal to the sum of— any actual damage sustained by such person as a result of the failure; in the case of an individual action twice the amount of any finance charge in connection with the transaction, (ii) in the case of an individual action relating to a consumer lease under part E of this subchapter, 25 per centum of the total amount of monthly payments under the lease, except that the liability under this subparagraph shall not be less than $200 nor greater than $2,000, (iii) in the case of an individual action relating to an open end consumer credit plan that is not secured by real property or a dwelling, twice the amount of any finance charge in connection with the transaction, with a minimum of $500 and a maximum of $5,000, or such higher amount as may be appropriate in the case of an established pattern or practice of such failures; 1 So in…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 2,753 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness Society (Supreme Court of the United States 1975, 421 U.S. 240)“…78i (e), 78r (a); Truth in Lending Act, 82 Stat. 157 , 15 U. S. C. § 1640 (a); Motor Vehicle Information and Cos…”
- Chapman v. Houston Welfare Rights Organization (Supreme Court of the United States 1979, 441 U.S. 600)“…2614 (Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act of 1974); 15 U. S. C. § 1640 (e) (Truth in Lending Act); 42 U. S.…”
- Mourning v. Family Publications Service, Inc. (Supreme Court of the United States 1973, 411 U.S. 356)“…1631 . [9] § 128, 15 U. S. C. § 1638 . [10] § 130, 15 U. S. C. § 1640 . [11] Ibid. [12] § 112, 15…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Code of Federal Regulations Title 16
§ 310.4Abusive telemarketing acts or practices.In forcecited in 9 of our articles
(a) Abusive conduct generally. It is an abusive telemarketing act or practice and a violation of this part for any seller or telemarketer to engage in the following conduct: (1) Threats, intimidation, or the use of profane or obscene language; (2) Requesting or receiving payment of any fee or consideration for goods or services represented to remove derogatory information from, or improve, a person's credit history, credit record, or credit rating until: (i) The time frame in which the seller has represented all of the goods or services will be provided to that person has expired; and (ii) The seller has provided the person with documentation in the form of a consumer report from a consumer reporting agency demonstrating that the promised results have been achieved, such report having been issued more than six months after the results were achieved. Nothing in this part should be construed to affect the requirement in the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ecfr.gov
Cited in 103 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Soundboard Ass'n v. Fed. Trade Comm'n (Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit 2018, 888 F.3d 1261)“…ns on customer privacy. 60 Fed. Reg. 43842 (Aug. 23, 1995); 16 C.F.R. § 310.4(b)(ii), (c). In 2003, the Commission am…”
- Charvat v. NMP, LLC (Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit 2011, 656 F.3d 440)“…Administrative Code (“O.A.C.”) § 109:4-3-11(A)(1)12 and/or 16 C.F.R. § 310.4(d)(2),13 and therefore in violation of…”
- Mainstream Marketing Services, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission (Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit 2004, 358 F.3d 1228)“…ve calls from or on behalf of that particular business. See 16 C.F.R. § 310.4(b)(1)(iii)(A); 47 C.F.R. § 64.1200(d)(3…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Can I Sue a Scammer? When a Lawyer Actually Helps After a Scam, Gift Card Scams: What to Do If You Paid a Scammer With a Gift Card, Lottery and Sweepstakes Scams: Fake PCH Calls and Prize Fees
§ 310.2Definitions.In forcecited in 6 of our articles
(a) Acquirer means a business organization, financial institution, or an agent of a business organization or financial institution that has authority from an organization that operates or licenses a credit card system to authorize merchants to accept, transmit, or process payment by credit card through the credit card system for money, goods or services, or anything else of value. (b) Attorney General means the chief legal officer of a state. (c) Billing information means any data that enables any person to access a customer's or donor's account, such as a credit card, checking, savings, share or similar account, utility bill, mortgage loan account, or debit card. (d) Caller identification service means a service that allows a telephone subscriber to have the telephone number, and, where available, name of the calling party transmitted contemporaneously with the telephone call, and displayed on a device in or connected to the subscriber's telephone. (e) Cardholder means a person to whom a credit card is issued or who is authorized to use a credit card on behalf of or in addition to the person to whom the credit card is issued.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ecfr.gov
Cited in 56 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- United States v. Dish Network LLC (District Court, C.D. Illinois 2017, 256 F. Supp. 3d 810)“…ed Established Business Relationship with a customer. TSR, 16 C.F.R. § 310.2 (o); FCC Rule, 47 C.F.R. *874 § 64.12…”
- Federal Trade Commission v. paddle.com Market Limited (District Court, District of Columbia 2025)“…on a device in or connected to the subscriber's telephone. 16 CFR 310.2(d) (enhanced display)…”
- FTC v. Day Pacer LLC (Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit 2025)“…services,” which described the com- panies’ activities. See 16 C.F.R. § 310.2(hh). Second, the LLC Defendants ass…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Debt Relief and Student Loan Forgiveness Scams: Signs and Your Rights
United States Code Title 18
§ 3663AMandatory restitution to victims of certain crimesIn forcecited in 4 of our articles
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, when sentencing a defendant convicted of an offense described in subsection (c), the court shall order, in addition to, or in the case of a misdemeanor, in addition to or in lieu of, any other penalty authorized by law, that the defendant make restitution to the victim of the offense or, if the victim is deceased, to the victim’s estate. For the purposes of this section, the term “victim” means a person directly and proximately harmed as a result of the commission of an offense for which restitution may be ordered including, in the case of an offense that involves as an element a scheme, conspiracy, or pattern of criminal activity, any person directly harmed by the defendant’s criminal conduct in the course of the scheme, conspiracy, or pattern. In the case of a victim who is under 18 years of age, incompetent, incapacitated, or deceased, the legal guardian of the victim or representative of the victim’s estate, another family member, or any other person appointed as suitable by the court, may assume the victim’s rights under this section, but in no event shall the defendant be named as such representative or guardian.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 1,997 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Dolan v. United States (Supreme Court of the United States 2010, 560 U.S. 605)“…U.S.C. § 844 (a), or a mandatory order of restitution, see 18 U.S.C. § 3663A, the Government cannot simply ask it to…”
- Pasquantino v. United States (Supreme Court of the United States 2005, 544 U.S. 349)“…plication of the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act of 1996, 18 U. S. C. § 3663A, to wire fraud offenses is corroborativ…”
- United States v. Lessner (Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2007)“…s v. Diaz, 245 F.3d 294, 312 (3d Cir. 2001). Under 18 U.S.C. § 3663A, full restitution is mandatory when an…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 3771Crime victims’ rightsIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
A crime victim has the following rights: The right to be reasonably protected from the accused. The right to reasonable, accurate, and timely notice of any public court proceeding, or any parole proceeding, involving the crime or of any release or escape of the accused. The right not to be excluded from any such public court proceeding, unless the court, after receiving clear and convincing evidence, determines that testimony by the victim would be materially altered if the victim heard other testimony at that proceeding. The right to be reasonably heard at any public proceeding in the district court involving release, plea, sentencing, or any parole proceeding. The reasonable right to confer with the attorney for the Government in the case. The right to full and timely restitution as provided in law. The right to proceedings free from unreasonable delay. The right to be treated with fairness and with respect for the victim’s dignity and privacy. The right to be informed in a timely manner of any plea bargain or deferred prosecution agreement.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 669 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Wainwright v. Sykes (Supreme Court of the United States 1977, 433 U.S. 72)“…that the Rule "promulgated by this Court and, pursuant to 18 U. S. C. § 3771 , `adopted' by Congress, governs by its…”
- Johnson v. Louisiana (Supreme Court of the United States 1972, 406 U.S. 356)“…by this Court with the concurrence of Congress pursuant to 18 U. S. C. § 3771 . After today a unanimous verdict will…”
- Davis v. United States (Supreme Court of the United States 1973, 411 U.S. 233)“…Rule 12 (b) (2) promulgated by this Court and, pursuant to 18 U. S. C. § 3771 , "adopted" by Congress, governs by its…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 1343Fraud by wire, radio, or televisionIn forcecited in 18 of our articles
Whoever, having devised or intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, transmits or causes to be transmitted by means of wire, radio, or television communication in interstate or foreign commerce, any writings, signs, signals, pictures, or sounds for the purpose of executing such scheme or artifice, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both. If the violation occurs in relation to, or involving any benefit authorized, transported, transmitted, transferred, disbursed, or paid in connection with, a presidentially declared major disaster or emergency (as those terms are defined in section 102 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5122)), or affects a financial institution, such person shall be fined not more than $1,000,000 or imprisoned not more than 30 years, or both.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 7,198 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Courts read § 1343 as requiring a scheme to defraud plus use of interstate wires to further it. In United States v. Allen (2007), the Fourth Circuit affirmed wire fraud convictions and said intent to repay eventually is irrelevant; in United States v. Barrington (2011), lost tuition from hacked grade changes counted as money or property.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd. (Supreme Court of the United States 2010, 561 U.S. 247)“…11 In that case we concluded that the wire-fraud statute, 18 U. S. C. § 1343 (2000 ed., Supp. II), was violated by…”
- Rubin v. United States (Supreme Court of the United States 1981, 449 U.S. 424)“…k loan application), 18 U. S. C. §1341 (mail fraud), and 18 U. S. C. § 1343 (wire fraud), as well as § 17 (a) (sec…”
- Bacchus Industries, Inc. v. Arvin Industries, Inc. (Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit 1991, 939 F.2d 887)“…to include mail fraud ( 18 U.S.C. § 1341 ) and wire fraud ( 18 U.S.C. § 1343 ). 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (1). These acts of…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Government Impersonation Scams: IRS, Social Security, Jury Duty, Police, Crypto and Investment Scams: Pig Butchering and Bitcoin ATM Scams, Rental Scams: Fake Listings, Lockbox Tours and How to Verify a Landlord
United States Code Title 42
§ 1397jDefinitionsIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
In this division: The term “abuse” means the knowing infliction of physical or psychological harm or the knowing deprivation of goods or services that are necessary to meet essential needs or to avoid physical or psychological harm. The term “adult protective services” means such services provided to adults as the Secretary may specify and includes services such as— receiving reports of adult abuse, neglect, or exploitation; investigating the reports described in subparagraph (A); case planning, monitoring, evaluation, and other case work and services; and providing, arranging for, or facilitating the provision of medical, social service, economic, legal, housing, law enforcement, or other protective, emergency, or support services. The term “caregiver” means an individual who has the responsibility for the care of an elder, either voluntarily, by contract, by receipt of payment for care, or as a result of the operation of law, and means a family member or other individual who provides (on behalf of such individual or of a public or private agency, organization, or institution) compensated or uncompensated care to an elder who needs supportive services in any setting.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 12 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- WM Crittenden Operations v. UFCW (Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit 2021, 9 F.4th 732)“…vidence of a general public policy against elder abuse. See 42 U.S.C. § 1397j(6); Ark. Code Ann. §§ 9-20-102, 12-12-1…”
- Edwards (District Court, M.D. Tennessee 2025)“…rights; (2) a claim for violation of the Elder Justice Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1397j et seq.; (3) a claim for neglige…”
- Edwards v. Wilson County Government (District Court, M.D. Tennessee 2025)“…rights; (2) a claim for violation of the Elder Justice Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1397j et seq., against all defendants; (3) n…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Elder Fraud: Scams Targeting Seniors and How to Report Them
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- FTC, What To Do if You Were Scammed (June 2026)(consumer.ftc.gov).gov
- FBI Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3)(ic3.gov).gov
- FTC, How To Avoid a Scam (July 2023)(consumer.ftc.gov).gov
- FTC, What's a verification code and why would someone ask me for it? (March 7, 2024)(consumer.ftc.gov).gov
- FTC, Never move your money to protect it. That's a scam (March 5, 2024)(consumer.ftc.gov).gov
- FTC, Gift Card Scams(consumer.ftc.gov).gov
- FBI, 2025 Internet Crime Report (IC3)(ic3.gov).gov
- FTC, What To Know About Credit Freezes and Fraud Alerts(consumer.ftc.gov).gov
- FTC, ReportFraud.ftc.gov(reportfraud.ftc.gov).gov
- FTC, Contact the Federal Trade Commission(ftc.gov).gov
- DOJ Office for Victims of Crime, National Elder Fraud Hotline(ovc.ojp.gov).gov
- FBI IC3, Frequently Asked Questions(ic3.gov).gov
- 12 C.F.R. § 1005.6, Liability of consumer for unauthorized transfers (eCFR)(ecfr.gov).gov
- 12 C.F.R. Part 1026 (Regulation Z), §§ 1026.12 and 1026.13 (eCFR)(ecfr.gov).gov
- 15 U.S.C. § 45, FTC Act Section 5 (LII)(law.cornell.edu)
- 12 C.F.R. § 1005.11, Procedures for resolving errors (LII)(law.cornell.edu)
- 12 C.F.R. Part 1005 (Regulation E), §§ 1005.3 and 1005.34 (eCFR)(ecfr.gov).gov
- FTC, What To Know About Cryptocurrency and Scams(consumer.ftc.gov).gov
- FTC, How To Spot, Avoid, and Report Fake Check Scams(consumer.ftc.gov).gov
- 12 C.F.R. § 1005.2, Definitions (eCFR)(ecfr.gov).gov
- CFPB, Electronic Fund Transfers FAQs(consumerfinance.gov).gov
- Zelle, Report a Fraud or Scam (company policy)(zelle.com)
- FTC, How To Recognize and Avoid Phishing Scams(consumer.ftc.gov).gov
- FTC Data Spotlight, Top text scams of 2024 (April 14, 2025)(ftc.gov).gov
- U.S. Postal Inspection Service, Smishing: Package Tracking Text Scams(uspis.gov).gov
- FTC, How To Recognize and Report Spam Text Messages(consumer.ftc.gov).gov
- FTC, Do you use payment apps like Venmo, Cash App, or Zelle? Read this (August 14, 2023)(consumer.ftc.gov).gov
- FTC, How To Spot, Avoid, and Report Tech Support Scams(consumer.ftc.gov).gov
- FBI IC3, Public Service Announcement I-051525-PSA (May 15, 2025)(ic3.gov).gov
- FTC, FTC Testifies Before Joint Economic Committee on Agency's Efforts to Combat Fraud (March 25, 2026)(ftc.gov).gov
- FBI Houston, FBI Warns of Money Mules (December 11, 2020)(fbi.gov).gov
- FTC, Refund and Recovery Scams (December 2023)(consumer.ftc.gov).gov
- FBI IC3, Fictitious Law Firms Targeting Cryptocurrency Scam Victims Offering to Recover Funds, I-062424-PSA (June 24, 2024)(ic3.gov).gov
- FBI IC3, Fictitious Law Firms Targeting Cryptocurrency Scam Victims Combine Multiple Exploitation Tactics While Offering to Recover Funds, I-081325-PSA (August 13, 2025)(ic3.gov).gov
- 16 C.F.R. § 310.4, Telemarketing Sales Rule abusive practices (eCFR)(ecfr.gov).gov
- 16 C.F.R. § 310.2, Telemarketing Sales Rule definitions (LII)(law.cornell.edu)
- National Association of Attorneys General, Find My AG(naag.org)
- SEC Investor.gov, Investor Bulletin: Investor Complaints(investor.gov).gov
- 15 U.S.C. § 1693m, EFTA civil liability (LII)(law.cornell.edu)
- 15 U.S.C. § 1640, TILA civil liability (LII)(law.cornell.edu)
- CFPB, Submit a complaint(consumerfinance.gov).gov
- FINRA Rule 12200, Arbitration Under an Arbitration Agreement or the Rules of FINRA(finra.org)
- FINRA Rule 12206, Time Limits(finra.org)
- FINRA, Find an Attorney(finra.org)
- 42 U.S.C. § 1397j, Elder Justice definitions (LII)(law.cornell.edu)
- Administration for Community Living, Adult Protective Services fact sheet(pfs2.acl.gov).gov
- NAPSA, Help in Your Area(napsa-now.org)
- Eldercare Locator (Administration for Community Living)(eldercare.acl.gov).gov
- DOJ EOIR, Recognition and Accreditation Program(justice.gov).gov
- DOJ EOIR, Recognition and Accreditation Roster Reports(justice.gov).gov
- 18 U.S.C. § 1343, Wire fraud (LII)(law.cornell.edu)
- 18 U.S.C. § 3663A, Mandatory restitution (LII)(law.cornell.edu)
- 18 U.S.C. § 3771, Crime victims' rights (LII)(law.cornell.edu)
- American Bar Association, Hire a Lawyer: lawyer referral(americanbar.org)
- Legal Services Corporation, I Need Legal Help(lsc.gov).gov
- FTC prepared statement, Joint Economic Committee hearing on the rising scam economy (March 25, 2026)(ftc.gov).gov
- FTC, ReporteFraude.ftc.gov (Spanish)(reportefraude.ftc.gov).gov
- FTC, Cómo evitar una estafa(consumidor.ftc.gov).gov
- FTC, Qué hacer si lo estafaron(consumidor.ftc.gov).gov
- FTC, What To Know About Identity Theft(consumer.ftc.gov).gov