How to Get Money Back After a Scam: Your Rights by Payment Method
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited October 3, 2026). · 27 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Whether you can get money back after a scam depends mostly on how you paid, and on one question: did the scammer move the money, or did you send it yourself after being tricked? Federal law gives real refund rights for credit card charges and for electronic transfers out of a bank account that someone else made without your authority, with fixed reporting deadlines under Regulation E (12 C.F.R. § 1005.6 and § 1005.11) and Regulation Z (12 C.F.R. § 1026.12 and § 1026.13). Wires, gift cards, cryptocurrency and cash carry few or no legal refund rights, so speed and the payment company's own fraud process matter most.
If it just happened: contact the company you paid through (card issuer, bank, payment app, wire company, gift card issuer or crypto exchange) using the number on your card or its official app, tell them a scammer tricked you, and ask them to stop or reverse the payment. That is the first step the Federal Trade Commission lists for nearly every payment method. Then follow up in writing and report the scam.
Information last verified on October 2, 2026. This article has not been reviewed by a licensed lawyer.
Jurisdiction scope: This article covers US federal law: the Electronic Fund Transfer Act and Regulation E, the Truth in Lending Act (including the Fair Credit Billing Act) and Regulation Z, and the FTC's Telemarketing Sales Rule, plus the published policies of some payment companies, which are policy rather than law. State laws (including state laws on cryptocurrency ATMs and state consumer-protection statutes) and card-network chargeback rules are not covered here.
Refund rights by payment method at a glance
| How you paid | Main federal rule | Deadline to know | Who to call first | Honest odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Credit card | Truth in Lending Act, Regulation Z (12 C.F.R. §§ 1026.12, 1026.13) | Written billing-error notice within 60 days after the first statement showing the charge | Card issuer (number on the back of the card) | The strongest legal protection of any method |
| Debit card, ACH or online transfer a scammer made | Electronic Fund Transfer Act, Regulation E (12 C.F.R. §§ 1005.6, 1005.11) | Two business days after learning a card or code was lost or stolen; 60 days after the statement | Your bank or credit union | Strong when the transfer was unauthorized |
| Bank transfer, debit payment, Zelle or app payment you sent yourself | Generally outside Regulation E's unauthorized-transfer definition | No refund clock in the law; report at once | Your bank or the app | Depends on the company's policy |
| Payment app (Venmo, Cash App, PayPal) | Regulation E for unauthorized transfers; purchase protection is company policy | PayPal: 180 days for an item not received (policy) | The app, through the app itself | Good for unauthorized transfers; limited for scams you paid |
| Bank wire | Regulation E excludes Fedwire-type systems used primarily between banks or businesses (12 C.F.R. § 1005.3(c)(3)) | None identified for a domestic wire; an international wire from a bank that regularly sends them can be cancelled within 30 minutes if not yet deposited (12 C.F.R. § 1005.34) | Your bank: ask for a recall | Low unless the money is frozen fast |
| International money transfer (Western Union, MoneyGram and similar) | Regulation E remittance rules (12 C.F.R. §§ 1005.33, 1005.34) | Cancel within 30 minutes; error notice within 180 days | The transfer company | Cancellation works only if you are fast |
| Gift card | No federal refund rule identified; issuer policy | Before the balance is spent | The issuer (number on the back of the card) | Low, but worth asking |
| Cryptocurrency | FTC: no protections like those for cards | None | The exchange or crypto ATM operator | Low |
| Fake check you deposited | You are usually responsible for money the bank paid out | Act before you send any money | Your bank | You usually owe the bank |
| Cash by mail | USPS Package Intercept (for a fee) | Before delivery | U.S. Postal Inspection Service, 1-877-876-2455 | Only if the package has not been delivered |
The question that decides most cases: unauthorized, or tricked into paying?
Bank and app refund rights turn on the word "unauthorized." Regulation E defines it this way:
"'Unauthorized electronic fund transfer' means an electronic fund transfer from a consumer's account initiated by a person other than the consumer without actual authority to initiate the transfer and from which the consumer receives no benefit." (12 C.F.R. § 1005.2(m))
The definition excludes transfers by someone you gave your card or code to, unless you told the bank that person's authority had ended. The official commentary narrows that exclusion for scams: "An unauthorized EFT includes a transfer initiated by a person who obtained the access device from the consumer through fraud or robbery." (Supplement I to Part 1005, comment 2(m)-3.)
When a scammer got into your account
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has applied that rule to common scams. Its Regulation E guidance says that when "a consumer is fraudulently induced into sharing account access information with a third party, and a third party uses that information to make an EFT from the consumer's account, the transfer is an unauthorized EFT under Regulation E." Its examples include a caller "pretending to be a representative from the consumer's financial institution" who tricks the consumer into providing "their account login information, texted account confirmation code, debit card number," and a scammer who uses phishing to "observe the consumer entering account login information."
The same guidance says your bank cannot hold your carelessness against you. Regulation E's commentary "expressly states that negligence by the consumer cannot be used as the basis for imposing greater liability than is permissible under Regulation E." So sharing a code with someone who sounded like your bank does not by itself cost you these protections.
When you sent the money yourself
If you personally sent the payment (for example, you wired money to a fake "investment adviser" or paid a fake seller through your bank app), the transfer was initiated by you, not by "a person other than the consumer." As written, the definition generally does not reach that payment, and banks and apps often treat it as authorized. The CFPB guidance we reviewed does not address this situation.
That does not mean the answer is always no. Some companies go further than the law by policy. Zelle's network operator, for example, says it "requires reimbursement for customers for certain qualifying imposter scams where the customer authorized the transaction," and describes that as going "above and beyond what is required by law." The Consumer Federation of America, a consumer advocacy group, told a House subcommittee in March 2026 that for authorized transfers, "To the extent scam victims receive relief, it is due to voluntary responses by providers, and not by the force of law." That is an advocate's statement, not a ruling.
Practical point: describe exactly what happened when you call. If the scammer obtained your login, code or card number and moved the money, say so; that is the situation the CFPB guidance treats as unauthorized.
Why speed matters
The FTC puts it simply: "If you’ve paid a scammer, the sooner you act, the better." The FBI's Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) runs a Recovery Asset Team that, according to the FBI's 2025 IC3 report, "streamlines communications with financial institutions and FBI field offices to assist in the freezing of funds for victims of fraudulent domestic and international transactions" through its Financial Fraud Kill Chain.
In 2025, the team worked 3,900 incidents involving $1,163,919,846 in attempted theft and froze $679,013,183, which the report lists as a 58% success rate. Those figures cover only the incidents the FBI acted on; they are not the odds for every scam victim.
The report's advice: "If you discover a fraudulent transfer, time is of the essence. Immediately, contact your financial institution and request a recall of the funds along with any necessary indemnification documents." It adds: "Regardless of the amount lost, file a complaint at www.ic3.gov. Be sure to include the full transaction details in your report."
Credit card payments
Governing law: the Truth in Lending Act and Regulation Z, including the billing-error rules from the Fair Credit Billing Act. Credit cards give the most protection of any payment method.
If someone used your card without authority
Your liability for unauthorized use "shall not exceed the lesser of $50 or the amount of money, property, labor, or services obtained by the unauthorized use before notification to the card issuer" (12 C.F.R. § 1026.12(b)(1)(ii)). Unauthorized use includes "a transaction initiated by a person who has obtained the credit card from the consumer, or otherwise initiated the transaction, through fraud or robbery" (Regulation Z commentary, comment 12(b)(1)(ii)-4). You may report unauthorized use "in person, by telephone, or in writing" (12 C.F.R. § 1026.12(b)(3)).
If you paid a scammer for something that never came
Regulation Z treats as a billing error a charge "for property or services not accepted by the consumer or the consumer's designee, or not delivered to the consumer or the consumer's designee as agreed" (12 C.F.R. § 1026.13(a)(3)). If you paid a fake seller who never delivered, you may have dispute rights under this rule. A charge you knowingly made for a service that turned out to be fraudulent sits between the categories, so present the facts and let the issuer classify them.
A separate rule lets a cardholder raise claims and defenses (other than tort claims) from a purchase against the card issuer, but only up to the amount still unpaid on that purchase when you first notify, only after a good-faith attempt to resolve the dispute with the seller, and (with exceptions) only when the charge exceeds $50 and the purchase occurred in your state or within 100 miles of your current designated address (12 C.F.R. § 1026.12(c); 15 U.S.C. § 1666i).
Deadline and what to put in writing
- Call the issuer now using the number on the back of the card, and ask for a new card number if the old one was exposed.
- Send a written billing-error notice so it is received at the billing-error address the issuer discloses "no later than 60 days after the creditor transmitted the first periodic statement that reflects the alleged billing error" (12 C.F.R. § 1026.13(b)(1)). A phone call alone does not start the billing-error protections.
- Include your name and account number, and, to the extent possible, why you believe there is an error and "the type, date, and amount of the error" (12 C.F.R. § 1026.13(b)(2)-(3)).
The issuer must acknowledge your notice in writing within 30 days and resolve it "within 2 complete billing cycles (but in no event later than 90 days)" (12 C.F.R. § 1026.13(c)). While it investigates, you "need not pay (and the creditor may not try to collect)" the disputed amount, and the issuer may not report you as delinquent for not paying it (12 C.F.R. § 1026.13(d)).
Debit card, bank account and ACH transfers
Governing law: the Electronic Fund Transfer Act (EFTA) and Regulation E. These rules protect you against unauthorized transfers, as explained above. In a lawsuit over your liability for an unauthorized transfer, the EFTA puts "the burden of proof ... upon the financial institution to show that the electronic fund transfer was authorized" (15 U.S.C. § 1693g(b)).
The deadlines that set your liability
- Two business days. If you notify the bank "within two business days after learning of the loss or theft of the access device" (a card, code or other means of access), your liability "shall not exceed the lesser of $50 or the amount of unauthorized transfers that occur before notice" (12 C.F.R. § 1005.6(b)(1)). Miss that window and the cap rises to $500, and transfers after the two days count against you only if the bank shows timely notice would have prevented them (§ 1005.6(b)(2)).
- 60 days after the statement. You "must report an unauthorized electronic fund transfer that appears on a periodic statement within 60 days of the financial institution's transmittal of the statement to avoid liability for subsequent transfers" (12 C.F.R. § 1005.6(b)(3)). For an unauthorized debit made without your card or code, the commentary's example is that if you report it within the 60 days, "the consumer has no liability" (comment 6(b)(3)-2).
- After 60 days. Your exposure is limited to transfers that occur after the 60 days and before you give notice, and only those the bank "establishes would not have occurred had the consumer notified the institution within the 60-day period" (§ 1005.6(b)(3)).
- Extenuating circumstances. If your delay was due to extenuating circumstances, the bank "shall extend the times specified above to a reasonable period" (§ 1005.6(b)(4)). The commentary names "extended travel or hospitalization" as examples.
Someone else can report for you. The commentary says notice "by a person acting on the consumer's behalf is considered valid," for example when the account holder is hospitalized, though the bank may ask for documentation of that person's authority (comment 6(b)(5)-2).
What the bank must do after you report
| Step | Rule (12 C.F.R. § 1005.11) |
|---|---|
| Your notice | Oral or written, received "no later than 60 days after the institution sends the periodic statement" first showing the error |
| Written confirmation | The bank may require it within 10 business days of an oral notice, and must tell you so and give the address; if it requires confirmation and does not receive it in time, it need not give provisional credit |
| Investigation | Decide within 10 business days, or take up to 45 days if it provisionally credits your account within 10 business days |
| Provisional credit | The amount in dispute, minus up to $50 where the bank reasonably believes an unauthorized transfer occurred |
| Longer windows | 20 business days and 90 days for transfers within 30 days after the first deposit to a new account; 90 days for point-of-sale debit card transactions and transfers not initiated within a state |
| Results | Reported within three business days after the investigation; a found error corrected within one business day |
The CFPB's guidance adds that a bank "must begin its investigation promptly upon receipt of an oral or written notice of error" and cannot require you to contact the merchant first. Network rules saying a payment is "final and irrevocable" do "not reduce consumer protections against liability for unauthorized EFTs."
What to put in writing: your name and account number, why you believe there is an error, and, as far as possible, the type, date and amount (§ 1005.11(b)(1)). Say plainly whether someone obtained your login, code or card number, and when you learned of it.
Honest odds: good for transfers a scammer made. If you made a debit card purchase from a fake seller, note that Regulation E's list of "errors" in § 1005.11(a)(1) has no category for goods that were never delivered, unlike the credit card rule, so ask the bank whether it will dispute the charge.
Zelle and payment apps
Zelle moves money between bank accounts, so your bank is the institution with Regulation E duties. Asked whether your bank is "a financial institution with full error resolution obligations" when a fraudster initiates a transfer from your account through a payment service, the CFPB's answer is "Yes." Zelle's own pages say that when someone "gained access to your bank account and made an unauthorized Zelle® payment," those transactions "typically qualify for reimbursement," while for a payment you knowingly sent, "Certain impostor scams qualify for reimbursement." Zelle also says it "does not offer a protection program for any authorized payments," such as an item you never received.
Payment apps that hold your money have their own duties. Announcing a January 2025 order against Cash App's operator, the CFPB said "The Electronic Fund Transfer Act generally requires that peer-to-peer platforms, including Cash App, investigate disputes of unauthorized transactions." Purchase protection is a separate matter of company policy: as of October 2026, PayPal's buyer protection excludes "payments sent using PayPal's friends and family functionality" and requires an item-not-received dispute "within 180 days of the date you sent the payment." Venmo limits its purchase protection to certain payments to business profiles or payments marked for goods and services.
Cash App's terms warn that "scams may result in the loss of your funds with no recourse." For the full breakdown of each company's policy, enforcement history and the steps to take, see our guide to Zelle and payment app scams.
Wire transfers
A wire sent through your bank
Regulation E excludes "Any transfer of funds through Fedwire or through a similar wire transfer system that is used primarily for transfers between financial institutions or between businesses" (12 C.F.R. § 1005.3(c)(3)). Whether a particular consumer wire falls in that exclusion is a legal question we did not resolve, so do not assume either way; assume instead that the money is moving fast.
If the wire went to someone in another country, your bank's transfer may be a remittance transfer with the 30-minute cancellation and 180-day error rights described below, unless the bank sends 500 or fewer such transfers a year (12 C.F.R. § 1005.30).
Call your bank immediately and ask it to recall the wire, as the FBI advises. The FTC's advice for a bank wire is to report the fraudulent transfer and "Ask if they can reverse the wire transfer." Then file with IC3 at ic3.gov with the full transaction details.
A money transfer company or an international transfer
When you send money to someone "at a location in a foreign country" through a remittance provider, Regulation E's remittance rules apply (12 C.F.R. § 1005.30). Two rights matter:
- 30-minute cancellation. The provider must cancel and refund if your request is received "no later than 30 minutes after the sender makes payment" and the funds "have not been picked up by the designated recipient or deposited into an account of the designated recipient" (12 C.F.R. § 1005.34(a)). The refund, including fees, is due "within three business days."
- Error notice. You may report an error within "180 days after the disclosed date of availability," and the provider must decide "within 90 days" (12 C.F.R. § 1005.33(b)-(c)). The listed errors cover things like a wrong amount or late delivery; being deceived into sending the money is not among them.
The FTC warns that "Wiring money with services like MoneyGram, Ria, and Western Union is like sending cash." Its advice is to contact the company right away, "Tell them it was a fraudulent transfer," and ask for a reversal and refund.
Gift cards
No federal rule we identified requires an issuer to refund a gift card balance a scammer took. The FTC says "Only scammers will tell you to buy a gift card, like a Google Play or Apple Card, and give them the numbers off the back of the card."

What to do, per the FTC: "Contact the gift card issuer immediately. Use the number on the back of the card. Tell them that a scammer tricked you into giving them the card number and PIN. Ask them to refund your money." Keep the card and the receipt. The FTC adds that "Some companies are helping stop gift card scams and might give your money back," and gives Google as an example: "If the money is still on the card, Google can put a freeze on it." That is issuer policy, not a legal right.
A common claim online is that federal law bans gift card payments. The Telemarketing Sales Rule bars sellers and telemarketers from accepting "a cash-to-cash money transfer or cash reload mechanism" as payment for anything sold through telemarketing (16 C.F.R. § 310.4(a)(10)), but that rule does not name retail gift cards.
Cryptocurrency
The FTC is direct: "Cryptocurrency payments typically are not reversible. Once you pay with cryptocurrency, you can usually only get your money back if the person you paid sends it back." It also says crypto payments "don't have the same legal protections as credit and debit cards do," though "some states have passed laws that might help you."
What to do: "Contact the cryptocurrency exchange or ATM operator immediately. Tell them it was a fraudulent transaction. Ask them to reverse the transaction and refund your money." Then report to the FTC at ReportFraud.ftc.gov and to the FBI at ic3.gov, and keep the wallet addresses and transaction IDs.
Crypto victims are a favorite target of fake "recovery" firms. See the warning below before you answer anyone who offers to trace your coins.
Checks and fake checks
If a stranger sent you a check and asked you to send part of it back, stop before you send anything. The FTC explains: "By law, banks have to make deposited funds available quickly. Even if you see the funds in your account, that doesn't mean it's a good check. Fake checks can take weeks to be discovered and untangled. By that time, the scammer has any money you sent, and you're stuck paying the money back to the bank."
If you already sent money from a fake check, the recovery route is the method you used to send it (a wire, gift card, app or crypto), covered above. The FTC warns that once you send a scammer gift card numbers, cryptocurrency or a wire transfer, "it's like you've given them cash. It's almost impossible to get it back."
If you wrote a check to a scammer, call your bank right away and ask whether payment can still be stopped. This guide does not cover stop-payment rules.
Cash or money orders sent by mail or courier
For cash sent through the U.S. mail, the FTC says to "Contact the U.S. Postal Inspection Service at 1-877-876-2455 immediately. For a fee, they can intercept the package. This lets you redirect a domestic shipment that hasn't been delivered." For FedEx, UPS or another carrier, contact them "as soon as possible."
Once a cash package is delivered, we found no legal mechanism to get the money back. For a money order, keep your receipt and contact the seller of the money order right away to ask whether it has been cashed; we did not verify a federal refund process for money orders.
Build your paper trail
Whatever you paid with, write down the date, amount, transaction or confirmation number, the account the money went to, and every phone number, email, website and screen name the scammer used. Save screenshots and texts.

The FBI's IC3 does not take attachments; its FAQ tells complainants to "keep all original documents in a secure location" in case an investigating agency asks for them. When you call your bank or card issuer, note the date, time and name of each person you speak to, then confirm the call in writing.
If the bank, card issuer or app says no
- Ask for the explanation and the documents. If a bank finds no error, its report "shall include a written explanation of the institution's findings and shall note the consumer's right to request the documents that the institution relied on" (12 C.F.R. § 1005.11(d)(1)). A card issuer that denies a billing error must explain its reasons and provide documentary evidence on request (12 C.F.R. § 1026.13(f)).
- Watch for a reversed provisional credit. If the bank takes back a provisional credit, it must tell you the date and amount and honor your checks and preauthorized payments for five business days after that notice (12 C.F.R. § 1005.11(d)(2)).
- File a CFPB complaint. The CFPB takes complaints about financial products and services at consumerfinance.gov/complaint or (855) 411-2372. It says "Most companies respond within 15 days," and that it will send your complaint to another government agency if that agency would be better able to assist. Include everything at once, because "you generally can't submit a second complaint about the same problem."
- Contact your state attorney general. The National Association of Attorneys General keeps a directory of every state attorney general.
- Know the deadline to sue. A company that fails to follow the EFTA is liable for actual damages, statutory damages of "not less than $100 nor greater than $1,000" in an individual action, plus, "in the case of any successful action to enforce the foregoing liability, the costs of the action, together with a reasonable attorney's fee" (15 U.S.C. § 1693m(a)). That excludes "an error resolved in accordance with section 1693f," and the suit must be filed "within one year from the date of the occurrence of the violation" (§ 1693m(g)). The Truth in Lending Act similarly makes a creditor that breaks the billing-error rules liable for actual damages, statutory damages, and, in a successful action, costs and a reasonable attorney's fee, with the same one-year limit (15 U.S.C. § 1640(a), (e)).
These are claims against a bank or card issuer that did not follow the rules. They are not a general right to be repaid for every scam.
Watch out: recovery scams
People who already lost money get targeted again. The FTC says scammers "buy lists of people who've paid scammers," then contact victims claiming to be "with a government agency, a consumer advocacy group, a law firm, or some other organization" and ask for a "retainer fee," "processing fee" or "tax." Its rule of thumb: "Did someone contact you and ask for an upfront fee? That's a scammer." It adds that government agencies and legitimate organizations "will not guarantee that you'll get your money back."
The FBI has warned repeatedly about fake law firms targeting cryptocurrency scam victims. Its August 2025 alert says "There are no law firms which are officially authorized partners of US Government agencies," and "The US Government does not request payment for law enforcement services provided." IC3 itself "does not work with any non-law enforcement entity, such as law firms or crypto services, to recuperate lost funds."
Under the Telemarketing Sales Rule, a telemarketer may not request or receive a fee for recovering money you lost "until seven (7) business days after such money or other item is delivered to that person," though the rule "shall not apply to goods or services provided to a person by a licensed attorney" (16 C.F.R. § 310.4(a)(3)). The rule covers telemarketing campaigns that involve more than one interstate telephone call (16 C.F.R. § 310.2).
If you lost money to a recovery scam, report it to the FTC at ReportFraud.ftc.gov and to your state attorney general.
When a lawyer helps
A lawyer is most useful when a bank, card issuer or app did not follow the federal rules above, because the EFTA and the Truth in Lending Act let a court award costs and a reasonable attorney's fee to a consumer who wins. The one-year filing limits make early advice worthwhile.
Suing the scammer is a different matter: it requires a defendant you can identify and reach. If prosecutors charge the scammer in federal court, the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act requires a sentencing court to order restitution for offenses "committed by fraud or deceit" with identifiable victims (18 U.S.C. § 3663A), but that depends on a conviction, and an order is not the same as payment. If your loss involved a brokerage firm or broker, FINRA arbitration may be available against FINRA members, generally within six years of the event (FINRA Rules 12200 and 12206); it is not available against a website or person that is not a FINRA member firm or associated person.
For free or low-cost help, the Legal Services Corporation lists legal aid organizations for low-income Americans, and the American Bar Association points to public-service lawyer referral services. The FBI's advice: "Be cautious of law firms contacting you unexpectedly, especially if you have not reported the crime to any law enforcement or civil protection agencies." Our scams and fraud law guide covers suing, restitution and lawyer options in more depth.
Report it, even if the money is gone
- FTC: ReportFraud.ftc.gov. The FTC uses reports to "build cases against scammers" and "spot trends." Spanish speakers can use ReporteFraude.ftc.gov and the FTC's Spanish guide, Qué hacer si lo estafaron.
- FBI: ic3.gov for any internet-enabled scam, with full transaction details.
- Age 60 or older: the Justice Department's National Elder Fraud Hotline, 833-372-8311, Monday to Friday, 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. Eastern, with English and Spanish available.
- Identity information given away: if you gave a scammer your Social Security number and it was used, the FTC directs you to IdentityTheft.gov. See how to report identity theft and credit freeze vs. fraud alert.
Our guide on where to report a scam explains what each agency does with a report.
Related guides
- Scams and fraud laws: the complete guide
- Zelle and payment app scams: can you get your money back?
- Where to report a scam
- Phishing, smishing and vishing
- Tech support and fake invoice scams
- Identity theft laws
Last updated: October 2, 2026.
Disclaimer: This article provides general legal information about US federal law as verified on October 2, 2026. It is not legal advice, and company policies described here can change at any time. For your specific situation, contact your card issuer, bank or payment company, the agency named above, or a lawyer licensed in your state.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I get my money back if I was scammed?
It depends on how you paid. Credit card charges and bank or debit transfers a scammer made without your authority have federal protections under Regulation Z and Regulation E; wires, gift cards, cryptocurrency and cash usually depend on how fast you act and the company's own policy.
Will my bank refund me if a scammer tricked me into giving my login or code?
The CFPB says that when a scammer tricks you into sharing account login information, a texted code or a debit card number and then moves money, the transfer is an unauthorized EFT under Regulation E. Report it to your bank as soon as you learn of it; your liability depends on how quickly you report (12 C.F.R. § 1005.6(b)), and the error notice must arrive within 60 days after the statement showing it (12 C.F.R. § 1005.11(b)).
Will my bank refund a payment I sent to a scammer myself?
Not necessarily. Regulation E's definition of an unauthorized transfer covers transfers initiated by a person other than the consumer, so banks often treat your own payment as authorized. Some providers reimburse certain impostor scams by policy, so ask anyway.
How long do I have to dispute a credit card charge from a scam?
A written billing-error notice must be received by the issuer within 60 days after it sent the first statement showing the charge (12 C.F.R. § 1026.13(b)). Unauthorized-use liability is capped at $50 (12 C.F.R. § 1026.12(b)).
How long do I have to report an unauthorized debit card or bank transfer?
Within two business days after learning your card or code was lost or stolen to keep your liability at $50 or less, and within 60 days after the statement showing the transfer to avoid liability for later transfers (12 C.F.R. § 1005.6(b)).
Does the bank have to give me provisional credit while it investigates?
If the bank takes more than 10 business days to investigate an electronic transfer error, it must provisionally credit your account within 10 business days to use the longer period of up to 45 days (12 C.F.R. § 1005.11(c)(2)).
Can a wire transfer be reversed after a scam?
Sometimes, if you act fast. Ask your bank to recall the wire and file at ic3.gov. For an international transfer through a remittance provider, you can cancel for a full refund within 30 minutes if the money has not been picked up or deposited (12 C.F.R. § 1005.34).
Can I get my money back from a gift card scam?
Possibly, if you act before the balance is spent. The FTC says to call the issuer using the number on the back of the card, say a scammer tricked you, ask for a refund, and keep the card and receipt. Refunds are issuer policy, not a legal right.
Can you get money back from a crypto scam?
Rarely. The FTC says crypto payments typically are not reversible and you can usually get money back only if the recipient sends it back. Contact the exchange or crypto ATM operator immediately and report to the FTC and ic3.gov.
Is someone offering to recover my scam losses for a fee legitimate?
The FTC says anyone who contacts you and asks for an upfront fee to recover lost money is a scammer. The Telemarketing Sales Rule bars telemarketers from charging for recovery until seven business days after the money is delivered, except for licensed attorneys (16 C.F.R. § 310.4(a)(3)).
Updates
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Code of Federal Regulations Title 12
§ 1005.6Liability of consumer for unauthorized transfers.In forcecited in 6 of our articles
(a) Conditions for liability. A consumer may be held liable, within the limitations described in paragraph (b) of this section, for an unauthorized electronic fund transfer involving the consumer's account only if the financial institution has provided the disclosures required by § 1005.7(b)(1), (2), and (3). If the unauthorized transfer involved an access device, it must be an accepted access device and the financial institution must have provided a means to identify the consumer to whom it was issued. (b) Limitations on amount of liability. A consumer's liability for an unauthorized electronic fund transfer or a series of related unauthorized transfers shall be determined as follows: (1) Timely notice given. If the consumer notifies the financial institution within two business days after learning of the loss or theft of the access device, the consumer's liability shall not exceed the lesser of $50 or the amount of unauthorized transfers that occur before notice to the financial institution. (2) Timely notice not given.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ecfr.gov
Cited in 7 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):In Widjaja v. JPMorgan Chase Bank (2021), the Ninth Circuit applied the 60-day rule reflected in § 1005.6(b)(3): late reporters owe later transfers only if the bank shows the delay caused them, but a suing consumer must plead facts they would have occurred anyway. Trang v. JPMorgan Chase Bank (2023) dismissed such claims on that basis.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Margaretha Widjaja v. Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2021, 21 F.4th 579)“…A ordinarily requires. See 15 U.S.C. §§ 1693f(a), 1693g(a); 12 C.F.R. § 1005.6(b)(3). 1 In June 2019, Widjaja fil…”
- Nelipa v. TD Bank, N.A. (District Court, E.D. New York 2024)“…ed electronic fund transfer[s].” 15 U.S.C. § 1693f(f)(1); 12 C.F.R. § 1005.6. The term “unauthorized electronic fund…”
- Trang v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (District Court, D. Oregon 2023)“…rs occurring outside the 60-day period.” Id. at 583 (citing 12 C.F.R. § 1005.6(b)(3); 12 C.F.R. pt. 1005, Supp. I, 6(b…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Zelle, Venmo, Cash App and PayPal Scams: Can You Get Money Back?, Phishing, Smishing and Vishing: Spot Them and What to Do If You Clicked, I Got Scammed: What to Do, How to Get Money Back, Where to Report
§ 1005.2Definitions.In forcecited in 9 of our articles
Except as otherwise provided in subpart B, for purposes of this part, the following definitions apply: (a)(1) “Access device” means a card, code, or other means of access to a consumer's account, or any combination thereof, that may be used by the consumer to initiate electronic fund transfers. (2) An access device becomes an “accepted access device” when the consumer: (i) Requests and receives, or signs, or uses (or authorizes another to use) the access device to transfer money between accounts or to obtain money, property, or services; (ii) Requests validation of an access device issued on an unsolicited basis; or (iii) Receives an access device in renewal of, or in substitution for, an accepted access device from either the financial institution that initially issued the device or a successor. (b)(1) “Account” means a demand deposit (checking), savings, or other consumer asset account (other than an occasional or incidental credit balance in a credit plan) held directly or indirectly by a financial institution and established primarily for personal, family, or household purposes.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ecfr.gov
Cited in 25 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Courts apply the § 1005.2 definitions to decide whether an account falls under the EFTA. In Yagoub Mohamed v. Bank of America (2024), the Fourth Circuit held pandemic benefits on a bank-issued prepaid card sat in a government benefit account; Brown v. Stored Value Cards (2020) found 'account' plausibly reached a jail release card.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Danica Brown v. Stored Value Cards, Inc. (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2020, 953 F.3d 567)“…ndants note that the regulation implementing section 1693i, 12 C.F.R. § 1005.2, was amended recently to state that “[t…”
- Yagoub Mohamed v. Bank of America, N.A. (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit 2024, 93 F.4th 205)“…tions” further defining “account” are published at 12 C.F.R. § 1005.2(b)(1). Those provisions are contained i…”
- Warner v. Tinder Inc. (District Court, C.D. California 2015, 105 F. Supp. 3d 1083)“…d in advance to recur at substantially regular intervals.” 12 C.F.R. § 1005.2 (k). “Written authorization” from the c…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Tech Support Scams and Fake Invoices: Geek Squad, McAfee, PayPal, A Scammer Has My Information: What They Can Do and How to Fix It, Bank Refused Your Scam Refund? How to Challenge a Fraud Claim Denial
§ 1005.11Procedures for resolving errors.In forcecited in 9 of our articles
(a) Definition of error —(1) Types of transfers or inquiries covered. The term “error” means: (i) An unauthorized electronic fund transfer; (ii) An incorrect electronic fund transfer to or from the consumer's account; (iii) The omission of an electronic fund transfer from a periodic statement; (iv) A computational or bookkeeping error made by the financial institution relating to an electronic fund transfer; (v) The consumer's receipt of an incorrect amount of money from an electronic terminal; (vi) An electronic fund transfer not identified in accordance with § 1005.9 or § 1005.10(a); or (vii) The consumer's request for documentation required by § 1005.9 or § 1005.10(a) or for additional information or clarification concerning an electronic fund transfer, including a request the consumer makes to determine whether an error exists under paragraphs (a)(1)(i) through (vi) of this section. (2) Types of inquiries not covered. The term “error” does not include: (i) A routine inquiry about the consumer's account balance; (ii) A request for information for tax or other recordkeeping purposes; or (iii) A request for duplicate copies of documentation.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ecfr.gov
Cited in 23 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Machinski (District Court, D. Utah 2026)“…entified by the financial institution or the consumer. See 12 C.F.R. § 1005.11. Regulation E provides a closed list of…”
- Sundahl (District Court, S.D. California 2026)“…notice requirements.” Id.; see 15 U.S.C. 20 § 1693f(a); 12 C.F.R. § 1005.11(b).…”
- Hubbard v. Chime Financial, Inc. (District Court, S.D. Ohio 2025)“…had failed to allege “which investigatory obligation under 12 C.F.R. § 1005.11(c) Huntington violated.” Lumbus, 2025 W…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Where to Report a Scam: Which Agency, and Can You Get Money Back?, Can I Sue a Scammer? When a Lawyer Actually Helps After a Scam
§ 1026.12Special credit card provisions.In forcecited in 6 of our articles
(a) Issuance of credit cards. Regardless of the purpose for which a credit card is to be used, including business, commercial, or agricultural use, no credit card shall be issued to any person except: (1) In response to an oral or written request or application for the card; or (2) As a renewal of, or substitute for, an accepted credit card. (b) Liability of cardholder for unauthorized use —(1)(i) Definition of unauthorized use. For purposes of this section, the term “unauthorized use” means the use of a credit card by a person, other than the cardholder, who does not have actual, implied, or apparent authority for such use, and from which the cardholder receives no benefit. (ii) Limitation on amount. The liability of a cardholder for unauthorized use of a credit card shall not exceed the lesser of $50 or the amount of money, property, labor, or services obtained by the unauthorized use before notification to the card issuer under paragraph (b)(3) of this section. (2) Conditions of liability.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ecfr.gov
Cited in 12 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Strubel v. Comenity Bank (Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit 2016, 842 F.3d 181)“…extension of credit.” The official staff interpretation of 12 C.F.R. § 1026.12(c)(1), the portion of Regulation Z impl…”
- William Krieger v. Bank of America NA (Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2018, 890 F.3d 429)“…he cardholder previously the “maximum potential liability,” 12 C.F.R. § 1026.12(b)(2)(ii), and a means by which the car…”
- William Lyons v. PNC Bank, N.A. (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit 2024)“…e cardholder held on deposit with the card issuer. 12 C.F.R. § 1026.12(d)(1). 2 In January 200…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 1026.13Billing error resolution.In forcecited in 5 of our articles
(a) Definition of billing error. For purposes of this section, the term billing error means: (1) A reflection on or with a periodic statement of an extension of credit that is not made to the consumer or to a person who has actual, implied, or apparent authority to use the consumer's credit card or open-end credit plan. (2) A reflection on or with a periodic statement of an extension of credit that is not identified in accordance with the requirements of §§ 1026.7(a)(2) or (b)(2), as applicable, and 1026.8. (3) A reflection on or with a periodic statement of an extension of credit for property or services not accepted by the consumer or the consumer's designee, or not delivered to the consumer or the consumer's designee as agreed. (4) A reflection on a periodic statement of the creditor's failure to credit properly a payment or other credit issued to the consumer's account. (5) A reflection on a periodic statement of a computational or similar error of an accounting nature that is made by the creditor. (6) A reflection on a periodic statement of an extension of credit for which the consumer requests additional clarification, including documentary evidence.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ecfr.gov
Cited in 21 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- William Krieger v. Bank of America NA (Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2018, 890 F.3d 429)“…on of Regulation Z as promulgated by the CFPB is located at 12 C.F.R. § 1026.13, a materially identical regulation, to…”
- Strubel v. Comenity Bank (Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit 2016, 842 F.3d 181)“…three business days before the scheduled payment date. See 12 C.F.R. § 1026.13(d)(1). Thus, disclosure of this righ…”
- Williams v. Capital One Bank, N.A. (District Court, District of Columbia 2025)“…deral law. Compare Compl. at 47, with 15 U.S.C. § 1666 and 12 C.F.R. § 1026.13 (requiring creditors to investigate and…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 1005.33Procedures for resolving errors.In force
(a) Definition of error —(1) Types of transfers or inquiries covered. For purposes of this section, the term error means: (i) An incorrect amount paid by a sender in connection with a remittance transfer unless the disclosure stated an estimate of the amount paid by a sender in accordance with § 1005.32(b)(2) and the difference results from application of the actual exchange rate, fees, and taxes, rather than any estimated amount; (ii) A computational or bookkeeping error made by the remittance transfer provider relating to a remittance transfer; (iii) The failure to make available to a designated recipient the amount of currency disclosed pursuant to § 1005.31(b)(1)(vii) and stated in the disclosure provided to the sender under § 1005.31(b)(2) or (3) for the remittance transfer, unless: (A) The disclosure stated an estimate of the amount to be received in accordance with § 1005.32(a) or (b)(1), (2), (4), or (5) and the difference results from application of the actual exchange rate, fees, and taxes, rather than any estimated amounts; or (B) The failure resulted from extraordinary circumstances outside the remittance transfer provider's control that could not have been reasonably…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ecfr.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2023
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Holmes v. Capital One, N.A. (District Court, N.D. New York 2023)“…amount of money or send funds to the incorrect recipient. 12 C.F.R. 1005.33, cmt. 33(f)(1) and Official Interpretat…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 1005.3Coverage.In forcecited in 3 of our articles
(a) General. This part applies to any electronic fund transfer that authorizes a financial institution to debit or credit a consumer's account. Generally, this part applies to financial institutions. For purposes of §§ 1005.3(b)(2) and (3), 1005.10(b), (d), and (e), 1005.13, and 1005.20, this part applies to any person, other than a person excluded from coverage of this part by section 1029 of the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010, Title X of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, Pub. L. 111-203, 124 Stat. 1376. The requirements of subpart B apply to remittance transfer providers. (b) Electronic fund transfer —(1) Definition. The term “electronic fund transfer” means any transfer of funds that is initiated through an electronic terminal, telephone, computer, or magnetic tape for the purpose of ordering, instructing, or authorizing a financial institution to debit or credit a consumer's account.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ecfr.gov
Cited in 15 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Costoso v. Bank of America, N.A. (District Court, E.D. New York 2015, 74 F. Supp. 3d 558)“…consumer deposit accounts are subject to Regulation E. See 12 C.F.R. 1005.3(a)(Regulation E encompasses “any electr…”
- Johnson, et al. v. People's United Bank, N.A. (District Court, D. New Hampshire 2016, 2016 DNH 206)“…thdrawals and transactions. See 15 U.S.C. § 1693a; see also 12 CFR § 1005.3(b). However, Johnson does not allege, a…”
- Machinski (District Court, D. Utah 2026)“…s defined by EFTA. Electronic fund transfers are defined in 12 C.F.R. § 1005.3(b).1 12 C.F.R. § 1005.3(c) details whi…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 1005.34Procedures for cancellation and refund of remittance transfers.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
(a) Sender right of cancellation and refund. Except as provided in § 1005.36(c), a remittance transfer provider shall comply with the requirements of this section with respect to any oral or written request to cancel a remittance transfer from the sender that is received by the provider no later than 30 minutes after the sender makes payment in connection with the remittance transfer if: (1) The request to cancel enables the provider to identify the sender's name and address or telephone number and the particular transfer to be cancelled; and (2) The transferred funds have not been picked up by the designated recipient or deposited into an account of the designated recipient. (b) Time limits and refund requirements. A remittance transfer provider shall refund, at no additional cost to the sender, the total amount of funds provided by the sender in connection with a remittance transfer, including any fees and, to the extent not prohibited by law, taxes imposed in connection with the remittance transfer, within three business days of receiving a sender's request to cancel the remittance transfer.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ecfr.gov
United States Code Title 15
§ 1693gConsumer liabilityIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
A consumer shall be liable for any unauthorized electronic fund transfer involving the account of such consumer only if the card or other means of access utilized for such transfer was an accepted card or other meanas 1 So in original. Probably should be “means”. of access and if the issuer of such card, code, or other means of access has provided a means whereby the user of such card, code, or other means of access can be identified as the person authorized to use it, such as by signature, photograph, or fingerprint or by electronic or mechanical confirmation. In no event, however, shall a consumer’s liability for an unauthorized transfer exceed the lesser of— $50; or the amount of money or value of property or services obtained in such unauthorized electronic fund transfer prior to the time the financial institution is notified of, or otherwise becomes aware of, circumstances which lead to the reasonable belief that an unauthorized electronic fund transfer involving the consumer’s account has been or may be effected.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 43 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Friedman v. 24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc. (District Court, C.D. California 2008, 580 F. Supp. 2d 985)“…failure to allege compliance with the notice requirement of 15 U.S.C. § 1693g(a). Section 1693g, entitled “Consumer L…”
- Margaretha Widjaja v. Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2021, 21 F.4th 579)“…ce did not excuse her failure to report. Nonetheless, under 15 U.S.C. § 1693g(a), a consumer may be held liable for u…”
- United States v. Goldblatt, Lynn David (Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 1987, 813 F.2d 619)“…s due to unauthorized account withdrawals. See 15 U.S.C. § 1693g. The Act places the *626…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 1693mCivil liabilityIn forcecited in 4 of our articles
Except as otherwise provided by this section and section 1693h of this title, any person who fails to comply with any provision of this subchapter with respect to any consumer, except for an error resolved in accordance with section 1693f of this title, is liable to such consumer in an amount equal to the sum of— any actual damage sustained by such consumer as a result of such failure; in the case of an individual action, an amount not less than $100 nor greater than $1,000; or in the case of a class action, such amount as the court may allow, except that (i) as to each member of the class no minimum recovery shall be applicable, and (ii) the total recovery under this subparagraph in any class action or series of class actions arising out of the same failure to comply by the same person shall not be more than the lesser of $500,000 or 1 per centum of the net worth of the defendant; and in the case of any successful action to enforce the foregoing liability, the costs of the action, together with a reasonable attorney’s fee as determined by the court.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 183 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Marx v. General Revenue Corp. (Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit 2011, 668 F.3d 1174)“…employees claiming to have been punished for jury service); 15 U.S.C. § 1693m(f) (awarding attorney’s fees to defenda…”
- David Hughes v. Kore of Indiana Enterprise Inc (Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit 2013, 731 F.3d 672)“…damages of at least $100 but not more than $1000. 15 U.S.C. §§ 1693m(a)(1), (a)(2)(A). If a class actio…”
- Wike v. Vertrue, Inc. (Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit 2009, 566 F.3d 590)“…one year from the date of the occurrence of the violation," 15 U.S.C. § 1693m(g), and the question here is when the a…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 1640Civil liabilityIn forcecited in 4 of our articles
Except as otherwise provided in this section, any creditor who fails to comply with any requirement imposed under this part, including any requirement under section 1635 of this title, subsection (f) or (g) of section 1641 of this title, or part D or E of this subchapter with respect to any person is liable to such person in an amount equal to the sum of— any actual damage sustained by such person as a result of the failure; in the case of an individual action twice the amount of any finance charge in connection with the transaction, (ii) in the case of an individual action relating to a consumer lease under part E of this subchapter, 25 per centum of the total amount of monthly payments under the lease, except that the liability under this subparagraph shall not be less than $200 nor greater than $2,000, (iii) in the case of an individual action relating to an open end consumer credit plan that is not secured by real property or a dwelling, twice the amount of any finance charge in connection with the transaction, with a minimum of $500 and a maximum of $5,000, or such higher amount as may be appropriate in the case of an established pattern or practice of such failures; 1 So in…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 2,753 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness Society (Supreme Court of the United States 1975, 421 U.S. 240)“…78i (e), 78r (a); Truth in Lending Act, 82 Stat. 157 , 15 U. S. C. § 1640 (a); Motor Vehicle Information and Cos…”
- Chapman v. Houston Welfare Rights Organization (Supreme Court of the United States 1979, 441 U.S. 600)“…2614 (Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act of 1974); 15 U. S. C. § 1640 (e) (Truth in Lending Act); 42 U. S.…”
- Mourning v. Family Publications Service, Inc. (Supreme Court of the United States 1973, 411 U.S. 356)“…1631 . [9] § 128, 15 U. S. C. § 1638 . [10] § 130, 15 U. S. C. § 1640 . [11] Ibid. [12] § 112, 15…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 1666iAssertion by cardholder against card issuer of claims and defenses arising out of credit card transaction; prerequisites; limitation on amount of claims or defensesIn force
Subject to the limitation contained in subsection (b), a card issuer who has issued a credit card to a cardholder pursuant to an open end consumer credit plan shall be subject to all claims (other than tort claims) and defenses arising out of any transaction in which the credit card is used as a method of payment or extension of credit if (1) the obligor has made a good faith attempt to obtain satisfactory resolution of a disagreement or problem relative to the transaction from the person honoring the credit card; (2) the amount of the initial transaction exceeds $50; and (3) the place where the initial transaction occurred was in the same State as the mailing address previously provided by the cardholder or was within 100 miles from such address, except that the limitations set forth in clauses (2) and (3) with respect to an obligor’s right to assert claims and defenses against a card issuer shall not be applicable to any transaction in which the person honoring the credit card (A) is the same person as the card issuer, (B) is controlled by the card issuer, (C) is under direct or indirect common control with the card issuer, (D) is a franchised dealer in the card issuer’s…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 11 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Strubel v. Comenity Bank (Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit 2016, 842 F.3d 181)“…aults Comenity for omitting from its own notice 16 Title 15 U.S.C. § 1666i(a) limits its protections to “claims .…”
- In Re Standard Financial Management Corp. (United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts 1988, 94 B.R. 231)“…thin 60 days of receiving the statement listing the charge, 15 U.S.C. § 1666i; (3) initial transaction took place wit…”
- Pollard v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank (District Court, E.D. Michigan 2014, 50 F. Supp. 3d 829)“…s in 2010. First, plaintiff alleges that defendant violated 15 U.S.C. § 1666i — 1(b)(4), which requires a creditor im…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Code of Federal Regulations Title 16
§ 310.2Definitions.In forcecited in 6 of our articles
(a) Acquirer means a business organization, financial institution, or an agent of a business organization or financial institution that has authority from an organization that operates or licenses a credit card system to authorize merchants to accept, transmit, or process payment by credit card through the credit card system for money, goods or services, or anything else of value. (b) Attorney General means the chief legal officer of a state. (c) Billing information means any data that enables any person to access a customer's or donor's account, such as a credit card, checking, savings, share or similar account, utility bill, mortgage loan account, or debit card. (d) Caller identification service means a service that allows a telephone subscriber to have the telephone number, and, where available, name of the calling party transmitted contemporaneously with the telephone call, and displayed on a device in or connected to the subscriber's telephone. (e) Cardholder means a person to whom a credit card is issued or who is authorized to use a credit card on behalf of or in addition to the person to whom the credit card is issued.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ecfr.gov
Cited in 56 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- United States v. Dish Network LLC (District Court, C.D. Illinois 2017, 256 F. Supp. 3d 810)“…ed Established Business Relationship with a customer. TSR, 16 C.F.R. § 310.2 (o); FCC Rule, 47 C.F.R. *874 § 64.12…”
- Federal Trade Commission v. paddle.com Market Limited (District Court, District of Columbia 2025)“…on a device in or connected to the subscriber's telephone. 16 CFR 310.2(d) (enhanced display)…”
- FTC v. Day Pacer LLC (Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit 2025)“…services,” which described the com- panies’ activities. See 16 C.F.R. § 310.2(hh). Second, the LLC Defendants ass…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Gift Card Scams: What to Do If You Paid a Scammer With a Gift Card, Debt Relief and Student Loan Forgiveness Scams: Signs and Your Rights
§ 310.4Abusive telemarketing acts or practices.In forcecited in 9 of our articles
(a) Abusive conduct generally. It is an abusive telemarketing act or practice and a violation of this part for any seller or telemarketer to engage in the following conduct: (1) Threats, intimidation, or the use of profane or obscene language; (2) Requesting or receiving payment of any fee or consideration for goods or services represented to remove derogatory information from, or improve, a person's credit history, credit record, or credit rating until: (i) The time frame in which the seller has represented all of the goods or services will be provided to that person has expired; and (ii) The seller has provided the person with documentation in the form of a consumer report from a consumer reporting agency demonstrating that the promised results have been achieved, such report having been issued more than six months after the results were achieved. Nothing in this part should be construed to affect the requirement in the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ecfr.gov
Cited in 103 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Soundboard Ass'n v. Fed. Trade Comm'n (Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit 2018, 888 F.3d 1261)“…ns on customer privacy. 60 Fed. Reg. 43842 (Aug. 23, 1995); 16 C.F.R. § 310.4(b)(ii), (c). In 2003, the Commission am…”
- Charvat v. NMP, LLC (Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit 2011, 656 F.3d 440)“…Administrative Code (“O.A.C.”) § 109:4-3-11(A)(1)12 and/or 16 C.F.R. § 310.4(d)(2),13 and therefore in violation of…”
- Mainstream Marketing Services, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission (Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit 2004, 358 F.3d 1228)“…ve calls from or on behalf of that particular business. See 16 C.F.R. § 310.4(b)(1)(iii)(A); 47 C.F.R. § 64.1200(d)(3…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Lottery and Sweepstakes Scams: Fake PCH Calls and Prize Fees, Charity and Disaster Scams: Warning Signs and How to Check a Charity
United States Code Title 18
§ 3663AMandatory restitution to victims of certain crimesIn forcecited in 4 of our articles
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, when sentencing a defendant convicted of an offense described in subsection (c), the court shall order, in addition to, or in the case of a misdemeanor, in addition to or in lieu of, any other penalty authorized by law, that the defendant make restitution to the victim of the offense or, if the victim is deceased, to the victim’s estate. For the purposes of this section, the term “victim” means a person directly and proximately harmed as a result of the commission of an offense for which restitution may be ordered including, in the case of an offense that involves as an element a scheme, conspiracy, or pattern of criminal activity, any person directly harmed by the defendant’s criminal conduct in the course of the scheme, conspiracy, or pattern. In the case of a victim who is under 18 years of age, incompetent, incapacitated, or deceased, the legal guardian of the victim or representative of the victim’s estate, another family member, or any other person appointed as suitable by the court, may assume the victim’s rights under this section, but in no event shall the defendant be named as such representative or guardian.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 1,997 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Dolan v. United States (Supreme Court of the United States 2010, 560 U.S. 605)“…U.S.C. § 844 (a), or a mandatory order of restitution, see 18 U.S.C. § 3663A, the Government cannot simply ask it to…”
- Pasquantino v. United States (Supreme Court of the United States 2005, 544 U.S. 349)“…plication of the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act of 1996, 18 U. S. C. § 3663A, to wire fraud offenses is corroborativ…”
- United States v. Lessner (Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2007)“…s v. Diaz, 245 F.3d 294, 312 (3d Cir. 2001). Under 18 U.S.C. § 3663A, full restitution is mandatory when an…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Electronic Code of Federal Regulations, 12 C.F.R. § 1005.6, Liability of consumer for unauthorized transfers (Regulation E)(ecfr.gov).gov
- Cornell LII, 12 C.F.R. § 1005.11, Procedures for resolving errors (Regulation E)(law.cornell.edu)
- Electronic Code of Federal Regulations, 12 C.F.R. Part 1026 (Regulation Z), §§ 1026.12 and 1026.13(ecfr.gov).gov
- FTC, What To Do if You Were Scammed (June 2026)(consumer.ftc.gov).gov
- FBI Internet Crime Complaint Center, 2025 IC3 Annual Report(ic3.gov).gov
- FTC, Refund and Recovery Scams (December 2023)(consumer.ftc.gov).gov
- Electronic Code of Federal Regulations, 12 C.F.R. § 1005.2, Definitions (Regulation E)(ecfr.gov).gov
- CFPB, Official Interpretation of 12 C.F.R. § 1005.2 (comment 2(m))(consumerfinance.gov).gov
- CFPB, Electronic Fund Transfers FAQs (Regulation E compliance aid)(consumerfinance.gov).gov
- Early Warning Services, The Facts About Zelle and Scams (media fact sheet)(zelle.com)
- Consumer Federation of America, statement for the record, House Financial Services Subcommittee on Financial Institutions, March 5, 2026(docs.house.gov).gov
- CFPB, Official Interpretation of 12 C.F.R. § 1026.12 (comment 12(b)(1)(ii)-4)(consumerfinance.gov).gov
- Cornell LII, 15 U.S.C. § 1693g, Consumer liability(law.cornell.edu)
- Zelle, Report a scam or fraud(zelle.com)
- Zelle, Security(zelle.com)
- CFPB, CFPB Orders Operator of Cash App to Pay $175 Million and Fix Its Failures on Fraud (January 16, 2025)(consumerfinance.gov).gov
- PayPal, Purchase Protection (last updated January 26, 2026)(paypal.com)
- Venmo, User Agreement (effective August 24, 2026)(venmo.com)
- Cash App, Terms of Service (last updated September 11, 2026)(cash.app)
- Electronic Code of Federal Regulations, 12 C.F.R. Part 1005 (Regulation E), §§ 1005.3, 1005.30, 1005.33, 1005.34(ecfr.gov).gov
- FTC, What To Know Before You Wire Money(consumer.ftc.gov).gov
- FTC, Gift Card Scams(consumer.ftc.gov).gov
- Electronic Code of Federal Regulations, 16 C.F.R. § 310.4, Abusive telemarketing acts or practices(ecfr.gov).gov
- FTC, What To Know About Cryptocurrency and Scams(consumer.ftc.gov).gov
- FTC, How To Spot, Avoid, and Report Fake Check Scams(consumer.ftc.gov).gov
- U.S. Postal Inspection Service, Report(uspis.gov).gov
- FBI IC3, Frequently Asked Questions(ic3.gov).gov
- CFPB, Submit a complaint(consumerfinance.gov).gov
- National Association of Attorneys General, Find My AG(naag.org)
- Cornell LII, 15 U.S.C. § 1693m, Civil liability(law.cornell.edu)
- Cornell LII, 15 U.S.C. § 1640, Civil liability (Truth in Lending Act)(law.cornell.edu)
- FBI IC3, Public Service Announcement I-062424-PSA, Fictitious Law Firms Targeting Cryptocurrency Scam Victims (June 24, 2024)(ic3.gov).gov
- FBI IC3, Public Service Announcement I-081325-PSA (August 13, 2025)(ic3.gov).gov
- FBI Internet Crime Complaint Center (ic3.gov)(ic3.gov).gov
- Cornell LII, 16 C.F.R. § 310.2, Definitions (Telemarketing Sales Rule)(law.cornell.edu)
- Cornell LII, 18 U.S.C. § 3663A, Mandatory restitution(law.cornell.edu)
- FINRA Rule 12200, Arbitration Under an Arbitration Agreement or the Rules of FINRA(finra.org)
- FINRA Rule 12206, Time Limits(finra.org)
- Legal Services Corporation, I Need Legal Help(lsc.gov).gov
- American Bar Association, Hire a Lawyer(americanbar.org)
- ReportFraud.ftc.gov(reportfraud.ftc.gov).gov
- FTC (en español), Qué hacer si lo estafaron(consumidor.ftc.gov).gov
- DOJ Office for Victims of Crime, National Elder Fraud Hotline(ovc.ojp.gov).gov