Zelle, Venmo, Cash App and PayPal Scams: Can You Get Money Back?
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited October 3, 2026). · 18 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Whether you can get money back from a Zelle, Venmo, Cash App or PayPal scam turns on one question: who sent the payment. If a scammer moved the money using your login, a code texted to you, or your debit card number, even if you were tricked into handing it over, federal Regulation E treats that as an unauthorized transfer, and your bank or app must investigate and limit your loss (12 C.F.R. § 1005.2(m) and the CFPB's EFT FAQs). If you sent the payment yourself, even because of a lie, the law as written does not promise a refund, and any money back depends on your bank's or the app's own policy.
If it happened in the last few hours: contact your bank or the app right now through its official app or the number on your card, say whether you sent the payment or someone else did, and ask them to reverse it. Then read on for your rights and deadlines.
Information last verified on October 2, 2026. This article has not been reviewed by a licensed lawyer.
Jurisdiction scope: This page covers United States federal law, chiefly the Electronic Fund Transfer Act (15 U.S.C. § 1693 and following) and the CFPB's Regulation E (12 C.F.R. Part 1005), plus the published policies of Zelle, Venmo, PayPal and Cash App as of the dates given. Company policies are contracts and statements, not law, and they change. We did not research state laws on payment-app scams, card-network chargeback rules, or the special Regulation E rules for prepaid accounts, so this page does not cover them. For payments by wire, gift card, crypto or credit card, see our guide on how to get money back after a scam.
Can I get my money back from Zelle, Venmo, Cash App or PayPal?
Sometimes, and the law gives you a firm right to it only in one situation: when someone else initiated the payment from your account. Everything else depends on policy, speed and persistence.
The Federal Trade Commission's first instruction is the same for every app: report it right away and ask for the payment to be reversed. For Zelle or a bank transfer, the FTC says to "Report it to your bank or credit union immediately" and "Ask them to reverse the payment and refund your money." For Venmo, Cash App or PayPal, it says to "Report it to the payment app immediately."
The FTC is also candid about the odds. In a 2023 alert on payment apps, it warned that sending money through a payment app "is like sending cash" and that "it's very hard to get it back." That warning is about payments you send. It is not the whole story when a scammer got into your account.
People filed 90,571 fraud reports naming a payment app or service as the payment method in 2024, with 391 million dollars in reported losses, according to the FTC's Consumer Sentinel Network Data Book 2024. Across all payment methods, consumers filed 3 million fraud reports in 2025 and reported 15.9 billion dollars in losses, the FTC told Congress's Joint Economic Committee in March 2026.
Did you send it, or did someone else? The question that decides your rights
Start by sorting your situation into one of three buckets. Each one has different rules.
| What happened | Legal category | What protects you |
|---|---|---|
| A scammer got your password, a texted code, or your card number (even by tricking you) and sent the money themselves | Unauthorized transfer | Regulation E: liability limits, deadlines, a required investigation |
| You opened the app and sent the money yourself because someone lied to you | Authorized payment induced by fraud | No refund right in Regulation E's definition as written; company policy only |
| You paid a seller for something that never came or was not as described | Purchase dispute | Company purchase-protection policy (PayPal, Venmo) if the payment was eligible; Zelle offers none |
When the law treats it as unauthorized
Regulation E defines the term this way:
"An unauthorized EFT is an EFT from a consumer's account initiated by a person other than the consumer without actual authority to initiate the transfer and from which the consumer receives no benefit." (CFPB, Electronic Fund Transfers FAQs, quoting 12 C.F.R. § 1005.2(m))
The definition excludes a transfer by someone you voluntarily gave your access device to, unless you told the institution that person was no longer authorized. But the official interpretation adds that "An unauthorized EFT includes a transfer initiated by a person who obtained the access device from the consumer through fraud or robbery" (Supplement I to Part 1005, comment 2(m)-3).
The CFPB has applied this directly to the most common payment-app con. Asked whether a transfer counts as unauthorized when a third party fraudulently induces a consumer to share account access information, the CFPB answered "Yes," and gave two examples:
"(1) a third-party calling the consumer and pretending to be a representative from the consumer's financial institution and then tricking the consumer into providing their account login information, texted account confirmation code, debit card number, or other information that could be used to initiate an EFT out of the consumer's account, and (2) a third party using phishing or other methods to gain access to a consumer's computer and observe the consumer entering account login information." (CFPB EFT FAQs, Error Resolution: Unauthorized EFTs, Question 5)
The CFPB also says a P2P transfer a fraudster initiates is unauthorized "even if the consumer does not have a relationship with, or does not recognize, the non-bank P2P payment provider" (Question 3).
Two more points from the same FAQs matter when a bank pushes back. First, your carelessness does not change the answer: the CFPB says "negligence by the consumer cannot be used as the basis for imposing greater liability than is permissible under Regulation E" (Question 7, citing comment 6(b)-2). Second, the bank cannot make you contact the merchant first; it "must begin its investigation promptly upon receipt of an oral or written notice of error" (Question 9).
When you sent it yourself
If you opened the app and pressed send, the transfer was initiated by you, not by "a person other than the consumer." On the face of the definition, that payment is not an unauthorized transfer, even though a lie caused it. The CFPB's EFT FAQs, which address scammer-initiated transfers in detail, do not address this situation.
Banks and apps commonly treat these payments as authorized. The Consumer Federation of America, an advocacy group, put it this way in a March 5, 2026 statement to a House Financial Services subcommittee: "To the extent scam victims receive relief, it is due to voluntary responses by providers, and not by the force of law." That is an advocate's view, not a ruling, but it matches how Zelle's own operator describes its policy (below).
This does not mean you should not ask. The FTC tells every scam victim to ask for a reversal, and some providers do reimburse certain authorized scams under their own rules.
Watch out: Be precise when you report. If the scammer used your code or login to send the money, say "I did not make this transfer; someone used information they tricked me into giving." If you sent it yourself, say so honestly and ask whether the bank's or app's scam-reimbursement policy applies. Mixing the two can get a valid unauthorized-transfer claim closed as an authorized payment.
How Zelle handles scams
Zelle moves money between bank accounts, so your bank or credit union, not Zelle, is the place to report. Zelle's support page says: "It is important that if you are enrolled in Zelle® through your bank or credit union to report the transaction directly to your bank or credit union." Zelle announced on October 31, 2024 that it was "phasing out the ability to enroll and transact within the standalone app," with users given "until March 2025 to re-enroll."
Zelle draws a similar line to the law, in its own words (these are company statements, not law, and the pages are undated):
- Fraud: "Fraud is when someone gained access to your bank account and made an unauthorized Zelle® payment... Because these transactions are unauthorized, they typically qualify for reimbursement."
- Scam: "A scam is when you knowingly send money but do not receive what you expected in return... Certain impostor scams qualify for reimbursement."
Zelle's security page is blunt about purchases: "Unlike a credit card, Zelle® does not offer a protection program for any authorized payments made with Zelle® – for example, if you do not receive the item or the item is not as described or as you expected." It also warns that once you authorize a payment, "you can't cancel it if the recipient is already enrolled in Zelle®."
A fact sheet published by Early Warning Services, the company that operates Zelle (the file is dated December 2025 in its web address), says the network requires participating banks to "Fully reimburse customers for any instance of confirmed fraud after a reasonable investigation." It adds that Zelle "requires reimbursement for customers for certain qualifying imposter scams where the customer authorized the transaction," which it calls going "above and beyond what is required by law." Zelle's pages that we reviewed do not define which impostor scams "qualify," so your bank decides that under rules we could not see.
One gap to know about: Zelle's example of fraud is a case where "you never authorized or were involved in the transaction." The CFPB's FAQ is broader. If you were tricked into reading out a code but the scammer pressed send, the CFPB treats that as unauthorized even though you were "involved." Point your bank to Question 5 of the CFPB's EFT FAQs if it says otherwise.
Zelle lists 1-844-428-8542 for questions about fraud or scams, but your report and dispute belong with your bank.
How Venmo and PayPal handle scams
PayPal and Venmo separate unauthorized activity from purchase disputes, and both limit purchase protection to payments for goods and services.
Venmo. Venmo's User Agreement (effective August 24, 2026) says: "We will protect you from unauthorized activity in your Venmo account." For purchases, "Certain Qualifying Payments made to a business profile or that are marked as for goods and services are eligible for the Venmo Purchase Protection Program." Venmo's eligibility page lists as ineligible "Payments that you make without swiping 'on' the 'Turn on for purchases' toggle" and payments reimbursing someone for a purchase, such as splitting a dinner bill. It also says marking a transaction as a purchase "does not mean that Purchase Protection automatically applies." On cancellations, the agreement warns that "since most Venmo payments are received within seconds, you may not be able to cancel your payment for a full refund once the payment is made."
PayPal. PayPal's Purchase Protection terms (last updated January 26, 2026) exclude "Personal Payments including payments sent using PayPal's friends and family functionality." Covered problems are "Item Not Received" and "Significantly Not as Described." The deadlines:
- Item Not Received: the dispute "must be opened within 180 days of the date you sent the payment to the seller."
- Significantly Not as Described: within 30 days of the date of delivery or within 180 days, "whichever is sooner."
Two limits catch marketplace buyers. An Item Not Received claim does not qualify "if the seller has provided proof of shipment or delivery." And for non-QR-code payments, a purchase is not eligible for Item Not Received claims if you pay in person or "order online, but collect the item in person."
PayPal says it "determines, in its sole discretion, whether your claim is eligible," and that a claim that a transaction "was not authorized by you" is "different from the Purchase Protection program." If you funded the payment with a debit or credit card, PayPal notes that "you may be entitled to dispute the transaction with your card issuer. Applicable card chargeback rights may be broader than those available to you under PayPal's Purchase Protection program." You must choose one route: PayPal says "You can't do both at the same time or seek a double recovery."
Pro tip: A seller who insists on friends-and-family, or on Zelle, for a purchase is asking you to give up the only buyer protection these apps offer. Zelle's own advice is to "only send money to people you personally know and trust," and the FTC says never to pay someone who insists you can only pay with a payment app.
How Cash App handles scams
Cash App's Terms of Service (last updated September 11, 2026) warn users that "scams may result in the loss of your funds with no recourse" and that Cash App is "not required to stop, cancel, or recover funds associated with a misdirected Payment Instruction." The same terms apply Regulation E error resolution to electronic fund transfers, including "unauthorized electronic funds transfers," and ask users to "provide notice to us within 60 Days of receiving the Statement reflecting the problem." The terms list 1-800-969-1940 as a contact number.
Payment apps that hold your balance can owe Regulation E duties themselves. Under 12 C.F.R. § 1005.2(i), as the CFPB quotes it, a financial institution includes "a bank, savings association, credit union, or any other person that directly or indirectly holds an account belonging to a consumer, or that issues an access device and agrees with a consumer to provide EFT services." In announcing its 2025 order against Block, the CFPB said the Electronic Fund Transfer Act "generally requires that peer-to-peer platforms, including Cash App, investigate disputes of unauthorized transactions, and a company cannot simply use fine print to escape these legal requirements."
Your bank still has duties when an app was used
If a scammer used an app to pull money from your bank account, your bank is not off the hook because the app sat in the middle. The CFPB's answer to that scenario: "the account-holding financial institution holds the consumer's account, and is thus considered a financial institution under Regulation E" with full error-resolution obligations (EFT FAQs, Question 11).
That matters because, according to the CFPB, Block did the opposite. The CFPB said Block directed users who had lost money to fraud "to ask their bank to attempt to reverse transactions, which Block would subsequently deny." If you are bounced between an app and a bank, file a written error notice with both.
Final and irrevocable does not cancel your rights
Payment networks often say transfers are final. The CFPB addressed this directly:
"Although private network rules and other commercial agreements may provide for interbank finality and irrevocability, they do not reduce consumer protections against liability for unauthorized EFTs afforded by the Electronic Fund Transfer Act. See 15 USC 1693g(e). Moreover, no agreement between a consumer and any other person may waive any right provided by the EFTA. See 15 USC 1693l." (CFPB EFT FAQs, Question 10)
So "final" describes the payment between banks. It does not decide who bears the loss on an unauthorized transfer. It also does not create a right where none exists: for a payment you authorized, "final" is usually the provider's starting position.
Deadlines and liability limits for unauthorized transfers
These rules apply to unauthorized transfers. Note the clock starts from different events.
| Rule | What it says | Source |
|---|---|---|
| 2 business days | Report within two business days after learning your access device was lost or stolen, and your liability "shall not exceed the lesser of $50 or the amount of unauthorized transfers that occur before notice" | 12 C.F.R. § 1005.6(b)(1) |
| After 2 business days | Liability "shall not exceed the lesser of $500" or the amounts set out in the rule | 12 C.F.R. § 1005.6(b)(2) |
| 60 days after the statement | Report an unauthorized transfer shown on a periodic statement within 60 days of the statement being sent, or you may be liable for transfers after the 60 days | 12 C.F.R. § 1005.6(b)(3); comment 6(b)(3)-1 |
| 60 days to give notice of an error | The institution must follow the error rules for a notice received "no later than 60 days after the institution sends the periodic statement" first showing the error | 12 C.F.R. § 1005.11(b)(1)(i) |
The $50 and $500 tiers are tied to the loss or theft of an access device, such as a card or code. For unauthorized transfers made without an access device, the official interpretation says that if you report within 60 days of the statement, "the consumer has no liability," while late reporting can expose you to transfers made after the 60-day period (comment 6(b)(3)-2). If you were delayed by "extended travel or hospitalization," the regulation's commentary gives those as examples of circumstances that require the institution to extend the notice periods (comment 6(b)(4)-1).
In a lawsuit over your liability for an unauthorized transfer, the statute says "the burden of proof is upon the financial institution to show that the electronic fund transfer was authorized" (15 U.S.C. § 1693g(b)).
What the bank or app must do after you report
Once a timely notice of error arrives, 12 C.F.R. § 1005.11 sets the clock:
- 10 business days to decide. The institution "shall determine whether an error occurred within 10 business days of receiving a notice of error," report the result within three business days after finishing, and correct an error within one business day of finding it (§ 1005.11(c)(1)).
- Up to 45 days, but only with provisional credit. If it needs longer, it may take up to 45 days, provided it "Provisionally credits the consumer's account in the amount of the alleged error" within 10 business days, gives you full use of the funds, and tells you within two business days of crediting. It may withhold a maximum of $50 in some unauthorized-transfer cases (§ 1005.11(c)(2)).
- Longer windows in some cases. The 10-business-day period becomes 20 business days if the transfer happened within 30 days after the account's first deposit, and 45 days becomes 90 days for a transfer that was not initiated within a state, resulted from a point-of-sale debit card transaction, or occurred within 30 days after the first deposit (§ 1005.11(c)(3)).
- Written confirmation. You can report orally, but the institution "may require the consumer to give written confirmation of an error within 10 business days of an oral notice," and must tell you where to send it. If it requires confirmation and does not get it, it need not provisionally credit you (§ 1005.11(b)(2), (c)(2)(i)(A)).
- If it finds no error. Its report must include "a written explanation of the institution's findings and shall note the consumer's right to request the documents that the institution relied on." Ask for those documents (§ 1005.11(d)(1)).
These deadlines apply to "errors," which include an unauthorized transfer. A provider that classifies your payment as authorized will usually deny the claim on that basis, which is why the description you give in step one of the next section matters.
Common Zelle, Venmo and Cash App scam scripts
Most P2P scams are variations on a few scripts. Recognizing the script also tells you which legal bucket you are in.

The fake fraud alert: send money to yourself
The FTC describes it: "scammers pose as your bank and tell you there's a problem with your account. To 'protect' your account, the scammer tells you step-by-step instructions to transfer money from your bank account into a new account in your name. But that new account really belongs to the scammer." The FTC's rule of thumb: "your bank will never contact you to tell you to transfer money or to ask for personal information or passcodes."
If the caller got your code and moved the money, the CFPB's Question 5 applies and the transfer is unauthorized. If you sent the money yourself on their instructions, you are in the authorized-payment bucket. Ask your bank directly whether the impostor-scam reimbursement Zelle describes applies to your case.
Fake customer support
The CFPB said that people searching the web for Cash App support "were targeted by fraudsters posing as Cash App representatives, who tricked them into giving up their passwords and other personal information." Reach any app's support from inside the app. The FTC's payment-app guide (May 2022) gives these routes: for Cash App, open your profile and choose Support; for Venmo, open your profile and choose Get Help; for PayPal, use its Resolution Center.
The marketplace seller who never ships
A stranger offers tickets or goods at a discount and insists on Zelle or a friends-and-family payment. Zelle's own security page uses this example ("is a stranger selling online concert tickets at a steep discount and insisting you pay with Zelle®? Think twice."). This is a purchase dispute. Zelle offers no purchase protection; PayPal and Venmo may, if the payment was an eligible goods-and-services payment.
Overpayment and fake checks
Venmo warns that "A scammer might send you a check and ask you to send them a payment on Venmo in return. The check will typically clear when you cash it with your bank, but will later bounce." The FTC's version of the rule: "never deposit a check and send money back to someone."
The stranger who paid you by mistake
If money arrives from someone you do not know, Venmo's guidance is to contact Venmo: "If you don't know the person who paid you, you should contact us as soon as possible so we can help reverse the payment." That routes any reversal through the app rather than through a new payment you send to a stranger.
Loved one in trouble, or a prize with fees
The FTC notes that scammers "might pretend to be a loved one who's in trouble and ask you for money to deal with an emergency. Others might say you won a prize or a sweepstakes but need to pay some fees to collect it." Its advice: "Don't send a payment to claim a prize or collect sweepstakes winnings."
For more on the messages that start these scams, see our guide to phishing, smishing and vishing. If the voice on the phone sounded exactly like a relative, read about AI voice-cloning scam calls.
What to do after a Zelle, Venmo, Cash App or PayPal scam
Speed matters most. Work through these steps in order.

- Report to your bank or the app now. For Zelle, call your bank or credit union. For Venmo, Cash App or PayPal, use the in-app support route. Use the number on the back of your card or the official app, not a number from a search result or a text.
- Say exactly what happened. State whether you sent the payment or someone else did. If someone else did, say it was an unauthorized transfer and ask the institution to open an error-resolution investigation under Regulation E.
- Put it in writing. Follow up your call with a written notice that gives your name, account number, the date and amount, and why you believe it is an error, which are the contents 12 C.F.R. § 1005.11(b)(1) describes. Keep a copy and note the date you sent it.
- Report to both the bank and the app if both were involved. Your bank has its own duties under the CFPB's Question 11, and the app may too.
- Secure your accounts. If you gave out a password, the FTC says to create a new, strong password and turn on two-factor authentication. Tell the institution if the scammer still has access, since the Regulation E limits reward prompt reporting.
- Report to the FTC. File at ReportFraud.ftc.gov, which offers the form in Español and other languages. The FTC says it "can't resolve your individual report," but shares reports with "over 2,000 law enforcers."
- Report to the FBI's IC3. The FBI's 2025 IC3 report says: "Regardless of the amount lost, file a complaint at www.ic3.gov. Be sure to include the full transaction details in your report." Its Recovery Asset Team works with banks to try to freeze funds, and it says "time is of the essence."
- Escalate to the CFPB if the bank or app stalls or denies. File at consumerfinance.gov/complaint or call (855) 411-2372. The CFPB says "Most companies respond within 15 days" and warns that "you generally can't submit a second complaint about the same problem," so include everything the first time.
- Track the deadlines. Count 10 business days from your notice. If the institution has not decided and has not provisionally credited your account, say so in writing and in your CFPB complaint.
Our guide on where to report a scam explains what each agency does with a report. If the scammer also got your Social Security number, start with how to report identity theft.
Watch out: After a loss, expect a second scam. The FTC warns that recovery scammers "buy lists of people who've paid scammers" and claim they can get your money back for a fee. "Government agencies and legitimate organizations will never ask for money to help you get a refund." Never pay anyone upfront to recover a P2P loss.
Zelle and Cash App lawsuits and settlements
Since early 2025, the newest actions have come from state attorneys general. Allegations below are allegations, not findings of a court.
CFPB v. Early Warning Services and three banks (dismissed). On December 20, 2024, the CFPB sued Early Warning Services, Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase and Wells Fargo in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona (No. 2:24-cv-03652), alleging unfair practices and that the banks violated the Electronic Fund Transfer Act and Regulation E. Early Warning called the suit "legally and factually flawed." On March 4, 2025, the CFPB voluntarily dismissed the case against all defendants with prejudice, and the court dismissed it on March 5, 2025. No court ruled on the merits.
CFPB order against Block, Cash App's operator (January 16, 2025). The CFPB ordered Block to pay up to $120 million in refunds and other redress, with a minimum of $75 million, and a $55 million penalty. The order required Block to "set up 24-hour, live-person customer service" and to "fully investigate unauthorized transactions and to provide timely refunds, where appropriate." The CFPB said at the time that consumers "will not need to take action at this time to obtain redress." We have not confirmed the order's current status or any redress payments since then. The CFPB lists Block's contacts for redress questions as 1-888-488-1181 and CFPBinquiry@cash.app.
New York Attorney General v. Early Warning Services (pending). On August 13, 2025, New York Attorney General Letitia James sued Zelle's operator, alleging that "EWS designed Zelle without critical safety features, allowing scammers to easily target users and steal over $1 billion between 2017 and 2023." The suit seeks restitution and damages for affected New Yorkers and a court order requiring anti-fraud measures. We treat the case as pending; we have not confirmed any ruling in it at a primary source.
46 attorneys general settle with Block (July 8, 2026). New York's attorney general and "a bipartisan coalition of 45 other attorneys general" secured $45 million from Block, alleging it misled users and failed to protect them from scams and fraud. Among the required changes: live support 24 hours a day and "Fulfilling its legal obligations to investigate fraud claims and reimburse users for unauthorized transactions." The announcement does not say the settlement covers people who authorized a payment to a scammer.
CFPB proposal withdrawn. The CFPB withdrew a proposed interpretive rule on "emerging payment mechanisms" as of May 15, 2025, and said it "will not take any further action" on it (90 Fed. Reg. 20568).
When a lawyer or regulator can help
For an unauthorized transfer that a bank or app denied without the investigation or explanation Regulation E requires, a consumer lawyer licensed in your state can tell you what remedies the Electronic Fund Transfer Act gives you and how long you have to act. Your state attorney general's consumer-protection office takes complaints too; New York's actions above began with that office.
For a payment you sent yourself, the realistic routes are the provider's own reimbursement policy, a CFPB complaint, and reports that help law enforcement. Be wary of anyone who promises recovery for a fee. For a broader view of your options by payment method, see the scams and fraud hub.
Related guides
- How to get money back after a scam
- Where to report a scam
- Phishing, smishing and vishing
- Tech support and fake invoice scams
- Phone scams targeting Spanish speakers
- Identity theft laws
Last updated: October 2, 2026.
This article provides general legal information about United States federal law and the published policies of Zelle, Venmo, PayPal and Cash App, verified as of October 2, 2026. It is not legal advice. Company policies change without notice. For your specific situation, contact your bank or payment app, the CFPB, or a lawyer licensed in your state.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I get my money back from Zelle if I was scammed?
If a scammer sent the money using your login or a code you were tricked into sharing, it is an unauthorized transfer under Regulation E and your bank must investigate (12 C.F.R. § 1005.2(m); CFPB EFT FAQ Question 5). If you sent it yourself, Zelle says certain impostor scams qualify for reimbursement, but there is no legal guarantee. Report it to your bank or credit union, not Zelle.
Does Zelle refund scams?
Zelle says fraud, meaning an unauthorized payment, typically qualifies for reimbursement, and that certain impostor scams qualify. It offers no protection program for authorized payments, such as an item that never arrives.
Can I cancel a Zelle payment?
Not if the recipient is already enrolled. Zelle says money then goes directly into the recipient's bank account and cannot be canceled.
Is a Venmo or PayPal friends-and-family payment protected?
No. PayPal's Purchase Protection excludes friends-and-family payments, and Venmo's Purchase Protection applies only to eligible payments to business profiles or marked for goods and services. Unauthorized activity is handled separately.
How long does a bank have to investigate a Zelle or app fraud claim?
Generally 10 business days after your notice, or up to 45 days if it provisionally credits your account within 10 business days (12 C.F.R. § 1005.11(c)). Some cases get 20 business days or 90 days.
How long do I have to report an unauthorized Cash App or Venmo transfer?
Report within two business days of learning your card or code was lost or stolen to cap liability at 50 dollars, and within 60 days after the statement showing the transfer to avoid liability for later transfers (12 C.F.R. § 1005.6(b)). Cash App's terms also ask for notice within 60 days of the statement.
Does a transfer being final and irrevocable mean I cannot get it back?
Not for an unauthorized transfer. The CFPB says network finality rules do not reduce Electronic Fund Transfer Act protections for unauthorized transfers.
Is the CFPB lawsuit against Zelle still going?
No. The CFPB voluntarily dismissed its suit against Early Warning Services and three banks with prejudice, and the court dismissed it on March 5, 2025. New York's attorney general filed its own suit against Early Warning Services in August 2025.
Updates
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Code of Federal Regulations Title 12
§ 1005.2Definitions.In forcecited in 9 of our articles
Except as otherwise provided in subpart B, for purposes of this part, the following definitions apply: (a)(1) “Access device” means a card, code, or other means of access to a consumer's account, or any combination thereof, that may be used by the consumer to initiate electronic fund transfers. (2) An access device becomes an “accepted access device” when the consumer: (i) Requests and receives, or signs, or uses (or authorizes another to use) the access device to transfer money between accounts or to obtain money, property, or services; (ii) Requests validation of an access device issued on an unsolicited basis; or (iii) Receives an access device in renewal of, or in substitution for, an accepted access device from either the financial institution that initially issued the device or a successor. (b)(1) “Account” means a demand deposit (checking), savings, or other consumer asset account (other than an occasional or incidental credit balance in a credit plan) held directly or indirectly by a financial institution and established primarily for personal, family, or household purposes.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ecfr.gov
Cited in 25 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Courts apply the § 1005.2 definitions to decide whether an account falls under the EFTA. In Yagoub Mohamed v. Bank of America (2024), the Fourth Circuit held pandemic benefits on a bank-issued prepaid card sat in a government benefit account; Brown v. Stored Value Cards (2020) found 'account' plausibly reached a jail release card.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Danica Brown v. Stored Value Cards, Inc. (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2020, 953 F.3d 567)“…ndants note that the regulation implementing section 1693i, 12 C.F.R. § 1005.2, was amended recently to state that “[t…”
- Yagoub Mohamed v. Bank of America, N.A. (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit 2024, 93 F.4th 205)“…tions” further defining “account” are published at 12 C.F.R. § 1005.2(b)(1). Those provisions are contained i…”
- Warner v. Tinder Inc. (District Court, C.D. California 2015, 105 F. Supp. 3d 1083)“…d in advance to recur at substantially regular intervals.” 12 C.F.R. § 1005.2 (k). “Written authorization” from the c…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: How to Get Money Back After a Scam: Your Rights by Payment Method, Phishing, Smishing and Vishing: Spot Them and What to Do If You Clicked, Tech Support Scams and Fake Invoices: Geek Squad, McAfee, PayPal
§ 1005.11Procedures for resolving errors.In forcecited in 9 of our articles
(a) Definition of error —(1) Types of transfers or inquiries covered. The term “error” means: (i) An unauthorized electronic fund transfer; (ii) An incorrect electronic fund transfer to or from the consumer's account; (iii) The omission of an electronic fund transfer from a periodic statement; (iv) A computational or bookkeeping error made by the financial institution relating to an electronic fund transfer; (v) The consumer's receipt of an incorrect amount of money from an electronic terminal; (vi) An electronic fund transfer not identified in accordance with § 1005.9 or § 1005.10(a); or (vii) The consumer's request for documentation required by § 1005.9 or § 1005.10(a) or for additional information or clarification concerning an electronic fund transfer, including a request the consumer makes to determine whether an error exists under paragraphs (a)(1)(i) through (vi) of this section. (2) Types of inquiries not covered. The term “error” does not include: (i) A routine inquiry about the consumer's account balance; (ii) A request for information for tax or other recordkeeping purposes; or (iii) A request for duplicate copies of documentation.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ecfr.gov
Cited in 23 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Machinski (District Court, D. Utah 2026)“…entified by the financial institution or the consumer. See 12 C.F.R. § 1005.11. Regulation E provides a closed list of…”
- Sundahl (District Court, S.D. California 2026)“…notice requirements.” Id.; see 15 U.S.C. 20 § 1693f(a); 12 C.F.R. § 1005.11(b).…”
- Hubbard v. Chime Financial, Inc. (District Court, S.D. Ohio 2025)“…had failed to allege “which investigatory obligation under 12 C.F.R. § 1005.11(c) Huntington violated.” Lumbus, 2025 W…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Where to Report a Scam: Which Agency, and Can You Get Money Back?, I Got Scammed: What to Do, How to Get Money Back, Where to Report, A Scammer Has My Information: What They Can Do and How to Fix It
§ 1005.6Liability of consumer for unauthorized transfers.In forcecited in 6 of our articles
(a) Conditions for liability. A consumer may be held liable, within the limitations described in paragraph (b) of this section, for an unauthorized electronic fund transfer involving the consumer's account only if the financial institution has provided the disclosures required by § 1005.7(b)(1), (2), and (3). If the unauthorized transfer involved an access device, it must be an accepted access device and the financial institution must have provided a means to identify the consumer to whom it was issued. (b) Limitations on amount of liability. A consumer's liability for an unauthorized electronic fund transfer or a series of related unauthorized transfers shall be determined as follows: (1) Timely notice given. If the consumer notifies the financial institution within two business days after learning of the loss or theft of the access device, the consumer's liability shall not exceed the lesser of $50 or the amount of unauthorized transfers that occur before notice to the financial institution. (2) Timely notice not given.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ecfr.gov
Cited in 7 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):In Widjaja v. JPMorgan Chase Bank (2021), the Ninth Circuit applied the 60-day rule reflected in § 1005.6(b)(3): late reporters owe later transfers only if the bank shows the delay caused them, but a suing consumer must plead facts they would have occurred anyway. Trang v. JPMorgan Chase Bank (2023) dismissed such claims on that basis.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Margaretha Widjaja v. Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2021, 21 F.4th 579)“…A ordinarily requires. See 15 U.S.C. §§ 1693f(a), 1693g(a); 12 C.F.R. § 1005.6(b)(3). 1 In June 2019, Widjaja fil…”
- Nelipa v. TD Bank, N.A. (District Court, E.D. New York 2024)“…ed electronic fund transfer[s].” 15 U.S.C. § 1693f(f)(1); 12 C.F.R. § 1005.6. The term “unauthorized electronic fund…”
- Trang v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (District Court, D. Oregon 2023)“…rs occurring outside the 60-day period.” Id. at 583 (citing 12 C.F.R. § 1005.6(b)(3); 12 C.F.R. pt. 1005, Supp. I, 6(b…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Bank Refused Your Scam Refund? How to Challenge a Fraud Claim Denial
United States Code Title 15
§ 1693gConsumer liabilityIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
A consumer shall be liable for any unauthorized electronic fund transfer involving the account of such consumer only if the card or other means of access utilized for such transfer was an accepted card or other meanas 1 So in original. Probably should be “means”. of access and if the issuer of such card, code, or other means of access has provided a means whereby the user of such card, code, or other means of access can be identified as the person authorized to use it, such as by signature, photograph, or fingerprint or by electronic or mechanical confirmation. In no event, however, shall a consumer’s liability for an unauthorized transfer exceed the lesser of— $50; or the amount of money or value of property or services obtained in such unauthorized electronic fund transfer prior to the time the financial institution is notified of, or otherwise becomes aware of, circumstances which lead to the reasonable belief that an unauthorized electronic fund transfer involving the consumer’s account has been or may be effected.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 43 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Friedman v. 24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc. (District Court, C.D. California 2008, 580 F. Supp. 2d 985)“…failure to allege compliance with the notice requirement of 15 U.S.C. § 1693g(a). Section 1693g, entitled “Consumer L…”
- Margaretha Widjaja v. Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2021, 21 F.4th 579)“…ce did not excuse her failure to report. Nonetheless, under 15 U.S.C. § 1693g(a), a consumer may be held liable for u…”
- United States v. Goldblatt, Lynn David (Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 1987, 813 F.2d 619)“…s due to unauthorized account withdrawals. See 15 U.S.C. § 1693g. The Act places the *626…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 1693aDefinitionsIn force
As used in this subchapter— the term “accepted card or other means of access” means a card, code, or other means of access to a consumer’s account for the purpose of initiating electronic fund transfers when the person to whom such card or other means of access was issued has requested and received or has signed or has used, or authorized another to use, such card or other means of access for the purpose of transferring money between accounts or obtaining money, property, labor, or services; the term “account” means a demand deposit, savings deposit, or other asset account (other than an occasional or incidental credit balance in an open end credit plan as defined in section 1602(i) 1 See References in Text note below. of this title), as described in regulations of the Bureau, established primarily for personal, family, or household purposes, but such term does not include an account held by a financial institution pursuant to a bona fide trust agreement; 2 So in original. There are two pars. designated “(4)” and no par. (3).
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 146 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Nordberg v. Trilegiant Corp. (District Court, N.D. California 2006, 445 F. Supp. 2d 1082)“…to debit or credit an account.” *1094 15 U.S.C. § 1693a(6) (emphasis added). 8 “[F…”
- Ironforge. Com v. Paychex, Inc. (District Court, W.D. New York 2010, 747 F. Supp. 2d 384)“…The statute does define “consumer,” as a “natural person.” 15 U.S.C. § 1693a(5). Corporations or other business enti…”
- Morvarid Paydar Kashanchi v. Texas Commerce Medical Bank, N.A. (Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit 1983, 703 F.2d 936)“…e of action was excluded from the coverage of the Act under 15 U.S.C. § 1693a(6)(E). The plaintiff timely appealed.…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 1693Congressional findings and declaration of purposeIn force
The Congress finds that the use of electronic systems to transfer funds provides the potential for substantial benefits to consumers. However, due to the unique characteristics of such systems, the application of existing consumer protection legislation is unclear, leaving the rights and liabilities of consumers, financial institutions, and intermediaries in electronic fund transfers undefined. It is the purpose of this subchapter to provide a basic framework establishing the rights, liabilities, and responsibilities of participants in electronic fund and remittance transfer systems. The primary objective of this subchapter, however, is the provision of individual consumer rights.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 426 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Terri L. Bass v. Stolper, Koritzinsky, Brewster & Neider, S.C. And Kathy Leschensky (Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit 1997, 111 F.3d 1322)“…For example, the Electronic Funds Transfer Act (“EFTA”), 15 U.S.C. sec. 1693 -1693r, which like the FDCPA was passed…”
- United States v. Goldblatt, Lynn David (Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 1987, 813 F.2d 619)“…PSFS in accordance with the Electronic Fund Transfer Act ( 15 U.S.C. §§ 1693 -1693r). On November 15, 1985, an ATM a…”
- Rosales v. Citibank, Federal Savings Bank (District Court, N.D. California 2001, 133 F. Supp. 2d 1177)“…alleging claims under the Electronic Funds Transfer Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1693 , and California’s Unfair Business Prac…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 1693lWaiver of rightsIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
No writing or other agreement between a consumer and any other person may contain any provision which constitutes a waiver of any right conferred or cause of action created by this subchapter. Nothing in this section prohibits, however, any writing or other agreement which grants to a consumer a more extensive right or remedy or greater protection than contained in this subchapter or a waiver given in settlement of a dispute or action.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 8 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2023
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Binns v. BB & T Bank (District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania 2019, 377 F. Supp. 3d 487)“…dies by agreement. See 13 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 4103 (a) ; 15 U.S.C. §§ 1693l, 1693g(d). As to this aspect of t…”
- Sparkman v. Comerica Bank (District Court, N.D. California 2023)“…ndants next move to dismiss claim 2, violation of the EFTA, 15 U.S.C. § 1693l, for 6 lack of subject matter jurisd…”
- Trang v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (District Court, D. Oregon 2023)“…seeks “declaratory relief.” Id. 17. Nowhere in the 2 See 15 U.S.C. § 1693l (“No writing or other agreement between…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- CFPB, Electronic Fund Transfers FAQs (Error Resolution: Unauthorized EFTs, Questions 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 10, 11)(consumerfinance.gov).gov
- FTC, What To Do if You Were Scammed (June 2026)(consumer.ftc.gov).gov
- FTC consumer alert on payment apps like Venmo, Cash App and Zelle (Aug. 14, 2023)(consumer.ftc.gov).gov
- FTC, Consumer Sentinel Network Data Book 2024(ftc.gov).gov
- FTC prepared statement, Joint Economic Committee hearing on the rising scam economy (Mar. 25, 2026)(ftc.gov).gov
- 12 C.F.R. Part 1005, Supplement I, official interpretations (comments 2(m)-3, 6(b)(3), 6(b)(4))(law.cornell.edu)
- Consumer Federation of America, statement for the record, House Financial Services Subcommittee on Financial Institutions (Mar. 5, 2026)(docs.house.gov).gov
- Zelle, Report a Fraud or Scam(zelle.com)
- Zelle, We’re Evolving How Consumers Send Money With Zelle (Oct. 31, 2024)(zellepay.com)
- Zelle, Security(zelle.com)
- Early Warning Services, The Facts About Zelle and Scams (media fact sheet)(zelle.com)
- Venmo User Agreement (effective Aug. 24, 2026)(venmo.com)
- Venmo, Purchase Protection eligibility(venmo.com)
- PayPal, Purchase Protection Program (last updated Jan. 26, 2026)(paypal.com)
- Cash App Terms of Service (last updated Sept. 11, 2026)(cash.app)
- CFPB, CFPB Orders Operator of Cash App to Pay $175 Million and Fix Its Failures on Fraud (Jan. 16, 2025)(consumerfinance.gov).gov
- 12 C.F.R. § 1005.6, Liability of consumer for unauthorized transfers(law.cornell.edu)
- 12 C.F.R. § 1005.11, Procedures for resolving errors(ecfr.gov).gov
- 15 U.S.C. § 1693g, Consumer liability(law.cornell.edu)
- Venmo, Common Scams on Venmo(help.venmo.com)
- FTC, How To Avoid a Scam (July 2023)(consumer.ftc.gov).gov
- FTC, Mobile Payment Apps: How To Avoid a Scam When You Use One (May 2022)(consumer.ftc.gov).gov
- FTC, ReportFraud.ftc.gov(reportfraud.ftc.gov).gov
- FBI Internet Crime Complaint Center, 2025 IC3 Annual Report(ic3.gov).gov
- CFPB, Submit a complaint(consumerfinance.gov).gov
- FTC, Refund and Recovery Scams (Dec. 2023)(consumer.ftc.gov).gov
- CFPB enforcement action: Early Warning Services, LLC; Bank of America; JPMorgan Chase; Wells Fargo (D. Ariz. No. 2:24-cv-03652)(consumerfinance.gov).gov
- Early Warning Services, Zelle responds to CFPB lawsuit (Dec. 20, 2024)(earlywarning.com)
- New York Attorney General, lawsuit against Early Warning Services, the company behind Zelle (Aug. 13, 2025)(ag.ny.gov).gov
- New York Attorney General, $45 million multistate settlement with Block (July 8, 2026)(ag.ny.gov).gov
- Federal Register, withdrawal of CFPB proposed interpretive rule on emerging payment mechanisms, 90 FR 20568 (May 15, 2025)(federalregister.gov).gov