Arizona
Arizona Scam and Fraud Laws: Where to Report, Your Right to Sue (2026)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited October 3, 2026). · 26 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Arizona's main consumer protection law, the Consumer Fraud Act, makes deception "in connection with the sale or advertisement of any merchandise" unlawful, but its text does not expressly give victims a right to sue. The Arizona Supreme Court held in 1974 that the Act grants one by implication to a person damaged by an unlawful practice, and the Attorney General's office says a private citizen must bring that lawsuit within one year. The Act's text sets no damages multiplier and no attorney's fee award for a private plaintiff.
Two other Arizona rules matter after a scam. Since September 26, 2025, crypto ATM operators must cap daily transactions and must refund a new customer who was tricked into using a kiosk, if the customer contacts the operator and the police or the Attorney General within 30 days and provides a report finding the fraud. And the Attorney General takes consumer complaints online, in English and Spanish, and tries to resolve them through an informal process; it does not act as your lawyer.
Information last verified on October 2, 2026. This article has not been reviewed by a licensed lawyer.
Jurisdiction scope: This guide covers Arizona state law: the Consumer Fraud Act (A.R.S. section 44-1521 and following), Arizona complaint offices, Arizona protections for vulnerable adults, the Arizona crypto kiosk law, and Arizona deadlines for suing. Federal refund and reporting rights are summarized briefly and covered in depth on our national guides. Out of scope: criminal defense, and the law of other states (if the scammer or business is elsewhere, that state's law may also matter).
First steps if you were scammed in Arizona
Contact the bank, card issuer, payment app, wire company or crypto exchange that moved your money right away. That company is usually the only one that can stop or reverse a payment, and your federal rights depend on how you paid. Our guide on how to get money back after a scam walks through each payment method, and the Zelle and payment app guide covers app transfers.
Then report it. Most scams go to the FTC at ReportFraud.ftc.gov and online crime to the FBI's IC3; our where to report a scam guide lists every federal channel. If you paid through a crypto ATM, move fast: the Arizona refund right below runs on a 30-day clock.
Where to report a scam in Arizona
| What happened | Arizona office | What it does with your report |
|---|---|---|
| A business or person deceived you, or you did not get what you paid for | Arizona Attorney General, consumer complaints (online form in English and Spanish; printable forms by mail, email or fax; Phoenix (602) 542-5763) | Reviews whether it has jurisdiction and, with your permission, can forward the complaint to the business and work to resolve it through informal dispute resolution. It does not represent you. |
| You were scammed through a crypto ATM (cryptocurrency kiosk) | Arizona Attorney General, crypto kiosk page (online report form; mail to the Special Investigations Section, 2005 N Central Ave, Phoenix 85004) | Takes reports of violations of the kiosk law, which the Attorney General enforces. A report is also one of the steps toward a refund (see below). |
| You have questions about a crypto ATM or investment scam | Arizona Corporation Commission Securities Division, (602) 542-4242 or Info@azinvestor.gov | Its 2025 announcement on the kiosk law invites calls and email, and encourages people who used a crypto ATM to send funds to someone they do not know to file a complaint with the Attorney General. |
| A problem with a bank, credit union, money transmitter, collection agency or other state-licensed financial business, or an unlicensed one | Arizona Department of Insurance and Financial Institutions (DIFI), (602) 364-3100 | Takes complaints about licensed entities that violate Arizona statutes and about unlicensed entities. It cannot award damages or give legal advice, and federally chartered banks and credit unions are outside its jurisdiction. |
| A vulnerable adult is being financially exploited | Arizona DES Adult Protective Services, 1-877-SOS-ADULT (1-877-767-2385), or an online report in English or Spanish | Receives reports of abuse, neglect and exploitation of vulnerable adults. |
Be realistic about what an Attorney General complaint does. The office says: "We do not represent you and cannot act as your attorney," and it cannot guarantee a resolution. It also says complaints and investigations "are confidential and cannot be disclosed to the general public." The complaint is a way to get the business's attention and help the state spot patterns; it is not a lawsuit.
Arizona's consumer protection law: can you sue?
Possibly, in the right case. The Consumer Fraud Act, A.R.S. section 44-1522(A), declares this an unlawful practice:
"The act, use or employment by any person of any deception, deceptive or unfair act or practice, fraud, false pretense, false promise, misrepresentation, or concealment, suppression or omission of any material fact with intent that others rely on such concealment, suppression or omission, in connection with the sale or advertisement of any merchandise whether or not any person has in fact been misled, deceived or damaged thereby, is declared to be an unlawful practice."
The key limit is the phrase "in connection with the sale or advertisement of any merchandise." Section 44-1521 defines merchandise broadly ("any objects, wares, goods, commodities, intangibles, real estate or services") and defines a sale to include "any sale, offer for sale or attempt to sell any merchandise for any consideration." A scam built around selling something, such as a fake product, a bogus service or a phony investment pitch, may fit. A scam with nothing offered for sale, such as a pure romance or impersonation scam, may not. Whether your situation fits depends on the facts.
The right to sue comes from a court, not the statute
The Act itself does not say that a victim may sue. In Sellinger v. Freeway Mobile Home Sales, Inc., 110 Ariz. 573, 521 P.2d 1119 (Ariz. 1974), the Arizona Supreme Court acknowledged that "The Consumer Fraud Act does not contain express language granting a private right of action," and then held: "Although the Act does not specifically provide for a right of action against persons violating the provisions of the article, we believe inferentially such right of action is granted by § 44-1533." That section says the article "shall not bar any claim against any person who has acquired any monies or property, real or personal, by means of any practice declared to be unlawful by this article."
The court also wrote that "a private remedy is highly desirable in order to control fraud in the marketplace." What a private plaintiff has to prove today (for example, about reliance and damages) comes from court decisions after Sellinger, which this guide does not summarize. An Arizona lawyer can tell you how they apply to your facts.
What the statute does and does not give a private plaintiff
The Act's text does not set a damages multiplier and does not award attorney's fees to a private plaintiff. The fee provision in the article, section 44-1534, lets the Attorney General recover costs, which "may include a sum representing reasonable attorney's fees." Whether a private plaintiff can recover fees or punitive damages on some other basis is a question for an Arizona lawyer; this guide does not answer it.
The Attorney General's own remedies are broader. In the state's case, a court may order the defendant to "Restore to any person in interest any monies or property" acquired through the unlawful practice, including through a receiver (section 44-1528(A)). The court can also impose a civil penalty "of not more than ten thousand dollars per violation" for a wilful violation (section 44-1531(A)). That penalty is part of the state's enforcement case, not a payment the victim receives.
The deadline
The Attorney General's complaint page states: "A private citizen may also bring an action for a violation of the Consumer Fraud Act within one year from the date the claim arises." That matches Arizona's one-year limit for a liability "created by statute, other than a penalty or forfeiture" (A.R.S. section 12-541(5)). The Arizona Court of Appeals has held that this one-year period starts, as for common-law fraud, when the defrauded party "discovers or with reasonable diligence could have discovered the fraud" (Alaface v. National Investment Co., 181 Ariz. 586 (App. 1994)). A common-law fraud claim has a different, longer clock, covered below.
The honest limit
A lawsuit needs a defendant you can identify, serve and collect from. That can work against an Arizona business or seller with a real address. It usually does not work against an anonymous scammer who called from a spoofed number or vanished with crypto, and a judgment does not help if nobody can be found to pay it. Our guide on when a lawyer helps after a scam covers how to tell the difference.
Protections for older and vulnerable adults in Arizona
Arizona's adult-protection laws are built around the "vulnerable adult," which section 46-451 defines as "an individual who is eighteen years of age or older and who is unable to protect himself from abuse, neglect or exploitation by others because of a physical or mental impairment." It is not an age-based test: an older person without an impairment is not automatically covered, and a younger adult with one can be. For a national overview, see our elder fraud guide.

A civil lawsuit against a trusted person. Under A.R.S. section 46-456(B), a person in a position of trust and confidence who exploits a vulnerable adult "shall be subject to actual damages and reasonable costs and attorney fees in a civil action brought by or on behalf of a vulnerable adult and the court may award additional damages in an amount up to two times the amount of the actual damages." The extra damages are up to the court.
That remedy is narrower than "anyone who scams a vulnerable adult." Section 46-456(J) defines a person in a position of trust and confidence to mean people such as a caregiver, a joint tenant or tenant in common, a fiduciary (including a de facto guardian or conservator), a beneficiary under a governing instrument, or "A person who is in a confidential relationship with the vulnerable adult." In plain terms, it usually does not reach an anonymous scammer the victim never knew. It also does not apply to an agent acting within the scope of duties as, or on behalf of, a bank, financial institution or escrow agent licensed under Title 6 of the Arizona Revised Statutes, or certain securities dealers, insurers and health care institutions (section 46-456(H)). The vulnerable adult, a conservator or a personal representative has first priority to bring the suit; otherwise another interested person may ask the court for permission (section 46-456(G)).
The crime. Section 13-1802(B) makes it theft to knowingly take control, title, use or management of a vulnerable adult's property "while acting in a position of trust and confidence and with the intent to deprive." The penalty follows Arizona's general theft scale by value, from a class 1 misdemeanor under $1,000 to a class 2 felony at $25,000 or more. Separately, a scheme to defraud is a class 2 felony under section 13-2310, and "Reliance on the part of any person shall not be a necessary element" of that crime.
Who must report. Section 46-454(A) requires health professionals, long-term care providers, social workers, peace officers, guardians, conservators and others responsible for a vulnerable adult's care to report suspected abuse or exploitation immediately, by telephone or online, to a peace officer or Adult Protective Services. Section 46-454(C) adds attorneys, accountants, trustees and others responsible for the vulnerable adult's tax records or property. A person who makes a report is immune from civil or criminal liability "unless the person acted with malice or unless such person has been charged with or is suspected of abusing, exploiting or neglecting the vulnerable adult in question" (section 46-453(A)). Anyone can call APS at 1-877-SOS-ADULT (1-877-767-2385).
Brokerage holds. Under section 46-473, a broker-dealer or investment adviser "may delay a disbursement or transaction from an account of an eligible adult" (someone 65 or older, or a vulnerable adult) if, after an internal review, it reasonably believes the transaction may result in financial exploitation. It must notify the account's parties, APS and the Corporation Commission within two business days. The delay lasts 15 business days, can be extended to no more than 25 business days total at the request of APS or the Commission, and can be extended further by a court. This section covers brokerage and investment-adviser accounts, not bank or credit union accounts. This guide did not confirm whether any other Arizona law lets a bank hold such a transaction, so tell the bank directly if you suspect a parent is being scammed.
For fraud against anyone 60 or older, the federal DOJ National Elder Fraud Hotline (833-372-8311) can also help you report; see where to report a scam.
Arizona scam laws on the books
Crypto ATMs (cryptocurrency kiosks)

Arizona's crypto kiosk law is A.R.S. section 6-1236, added by HB2387 (Laws 2025, chapter 171), which the Governor signed on May 12, 2025. It took effect September 26, 2025, the date the Attorney General and the Corporation Commission give and the date on which section 6-1236(K) treats every customer as a new customer for compliance purposes.
Daily limits. Under section 6-1236(F), an operator "may not accept transactions of more than $2,000 United States dollars in cash or the equivalent in virtual currency in one day from a new customer." For existing customers, the operator may not accept or dispense "in a single day more than $10,500." A new customer is someone who "has been a customer ... for less than ten days," and converts to an existing customer ten days after becoming a new customer.
Warnings, receipts and support. Before a transaction, the customer must accept two separate warnings (section 6-1236(B)). The operator must give a receipt showing its contact information, the transaction hash, the wallet addresses and its refund policy (section 6-1236(C)), use "blockchain analytics and tracing software" (section 6-1236(D)), and offer live customer service "twenty-four hours a day, seven days per week" (section 6-1236(G)).
The refund right. Section 6-1236(H) says that if a new customer "has been fraudulently induced" to make a kiosk transaction, the operator "shall issue a full refund ..., including any fees charged in association with the transaction," if the new customer does all of the following:
- Contacts the kiosk operator within 30 days.
- Contacts a law enforcement agency or the Attorney General within 30 days.
- Gives the operator "a report from the law enforcement agency or attorney general's office that determines that the new customer was fraudulently induced to engage in a cryptocurrency kiosk transaction."
Under section 6-1236(I), "A victim of fraud is eligible to receive a refund even if a cryptocurrency kiosk operator provides the required disclosures." Section 6-1236(H) gives this refund right to new customers only; existing customers do not get the same statutory refund. The Attorney General enforces the section, and a violation is also a violation of the Consumer Fraud Act's section 44-1522 (section 6-1236(J)).
The Attorney General's kiosk page says: "It is important to report alleged fraud ASAP, as you only have 30 Days." Save your receipts, call the operator's support number, and file the report with your local police or the Attorney General's office. For how crypto scams work and what else to try, see our crypto and investment scams guide.
A 2026 bill to license kiosk operators, HB2232, was held in committee and did not become law, according to the Legislature's bill records as of October 2, 2026. This guide does not describe any Arizona kiosk licensing requirement.
Canceling a door-to-door sale
Under A.R.S. section 44-5002(A), a buyer "may cancel a home solicitation sale until midnight of the third business day after the day on which the buyer signs an agreement." A home solicitation sale is, in general, an unsolicited sale made at the buyer's home (section 44-5001(1)), and any waiver of the right to cancel is void (section 44-5002(D)).
Robocalls and automated texts
Arizona's automated-solicitation statute, section 13-2919, prohibits certain automated dialing and recorded or text solicitations, with exceptions such as prior permission or an existing business relationship. A violation is a class 2 misdemeanor. For tricks that arrive by text, email or phone, see our phishing, smishing and vishing guide.
Suing a scammer or a business in Arizona
Small claims. Arizona's small claims statute covers a claim that "does not exceed $5,000, exclusive of interest and costs" (A.R.S. section 22-503(A)). That is the usual place for a modest claim against a business or an individual you can identify and serve.
Deadlines. A Consumer Fraud Act claim has the one-year period described above, which Arizona courts start from when the fraud was discovered or reasonably could have been. A common-law fraud claim gets three years under section 12-543(3), and that cause of action "shall not be deemed to have accrued until the discovery by the aggrieved party of the facts constituting the fraud or mistake." Which limit applies to your claim, and when the clock started, are questions to raise with an Arizona lawyer early. Our Arizona statute of limitations guide covers other civil deadlines.
Who you can actually reach. Lawsuits work against people and businesses with a name, an address and assets. A scammer who hid behind a fake identity, a spoofed caller ID or an overseas account is usually not reachable through an Arizona court. In those cases the payment company, a fast report to law enforcement (which also matters for the crypto kiosk refund), and protecting your identity are where your effort pays off.
Related guides
- Scams and fraud: your rights and where to start
- How to get money back after a scam
- Where to report a scam
- Crypto and investment scams
- Elder fraud
- A scammer has my information
- Arizona identity theft laws
- Arizona debt collection laws
- Arizona statute of limitations
Last updated: October 2, 2026.
This article is general legal information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, contact your payment company, the Arizona office named above, or a lawyer licensed in Arizona.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I sue a scammer in Arizona?
Possibly, if you can identify and serve them, the deception was in connection with the sale or advertisement of merchandise, and it caused you a loss. The Consumer Fraud Act (A.R.S. section 44-1522) has no express private right of action, but the Arizona Supreme Court implied one in Sellinger v. Freeway Mobile Home Sales (1974). An anonymous or overseas scammer is usually not reachable through an Arizona court.
Does the Arizona Consumer Fraud Act award triple damages or attorney's fees?
The Act's text sets no damages multiplier and no attorney's fee award for a private plaintiff; its fee provision (section 44-1534) runs to the Attorney General. Whether fees or punitive damages are available on another basis is a question for an Arizona lawyer.
How long do I have to sue under the Arizona Consumer Fraud Act?
The Attorney General's office says a private citizen may sue within one year from the date the claim arises, consistent with the one-year limit for statutory liabilities in A.R.S. section 12-541(5); the Arizona Court of Appeals has held that the year runs from when you discovered, or reasonably could have discovered, the fraud. A common-law fraud claim has three years from discovery under section 12-543(3).
Will the Arizona Attorney General get my money back?
Do not count on it. The office uses an informal dispute resolution process, cannot guarantee a resolution and says it does not represent you. In its own lawsuits a court may order money restored to people harmed (section 44-1528), but that is the state's case, not yours.
Can I get a refund from a crypto ATM in Arizona?
Possibly, if you were a new customer (a customer for less than ten days). Under A.R.S. section 6-1236(H), the operator must give a full refund including fees if you contact it and law enforcement or the Attorney General within 30 days and provide a report finding you were fraudulently induced. Existing customers do not get that statutory refund.
What are the crypto ATM limits in Arizona?
Since September 26, 2025, an operator may not accept more than $2,000 a day from a new customer or accept or dispense more than $10,500 a day for an existing customer (A.R.S. section 6-1236(F)).
Who do I call if an elderly person in Arizona is being scammed?
Call Arizona Adult Protective Services at 1-877-SOS-ADULT (1-877-767-2385) or report online. For fraud against anyone 60 or older, the DOJ National Elder Fraud Hotline (833-372-8311) can also help you report.
Can I sue someone for exploiting a vulnerable adult in Arizona?
Yes, if the person was in a position of trust and confidence, such as a caregiver, fiduciary or someone in a confidential relationship. A.R.S. section 46-456(B) allows actual damages, costs and attorney fees, and the court may add up to two times the actual damages. It usually does not reach an anonymous scammer.
Can an Arizona brokerage freeze a suspicious withdrawal from a senior's account?
Yes. Under A.R.S. section 46-473, a broker-dealer or investment adviser may delay a disbursement from the account of someone 65 or older or a vulnerable adult for 15 business days, extendable to 25 at the request of APS or the Corporation Commission. The section does not cover banks.
What is the small claims limit in Arizona?
A claim that does not exceed $5,000, exclusive of interest and costs (A.R.S. section 22-503(A)).
Updates
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Arizona Revised Statutes, Title 44 (Trade and Commerce), Chapter 10 (COMPETITION AND COMPETITIVE PRACTICES), Article 7 (Consumer Fraud)
§ 44-1522Unlawful practices; intended interpretation of provisionsIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
A. The act, use or employment by any person of any deception, deceptive or unfair act or practice, fraud, false pretense, false promise, misrepresentation, or concealment, suppression or omission of any material fact with intent that others rely on such concealment, suppression or omission, in connection with the sale or advertisement of any merchandise whether or not any person has in fact been misled, deceived or damaged thereby, is declared to be an unlawful practice. B. The violation of chapter 9, article 16 or chapter 19, article 1 of this title is declared to be an unlawful practice and subject to enforcement under this article. C. It is the intent of the legislature, in construing subsection A, that the courts may use as a guide interpretations given by the federal trade commission and the federal courts to 15 United States Code sections 45, 52 and 55(a)(1).
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-04 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at azleg.gov
Cited in 157 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Parks v. MacRo-dynamics, Inc. (Court of Appeals of Arizona 1979, 121 Ariz. 517)“…amen of which is fraud, both common law and statutory under A.R.S. Sec. 44-1522, alleges that in advertisements and in…”
- Peery v. Hansen (Court of Appeals of Arizona 1978, 120 Ariz. 266)“…eason of such acts. The unlawful practices are set forth in A.R.S. Sec. 44-1522; “A. The act, use, or employment by a…”
- Haisch v. Allstate Insurance (Court of Appeals of Arizona 2000, 197 Ariz. 606)“…misrepresentation" within the Arizona Consumer Fraud Act, A.R.S. § 44-1522(A); or b. a misrepresentation that wo…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Arizona Data Privacy Laws: Breach Rules & Consumer Rights (2026), Arizona Biometric Privacy Laws: Collection, Consent & Penalties (2026)
§ 44-1533Cumulative remediesIn force
A. The provisions of this article are in addition to all other causes of action, remedies and penalties available to this state. B. The provisions of this article shall not bar any claim against any person who has acquired any monies or property, real or personal, by means of any practice declared to be unlawful by this article.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-04 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at azleg.gov
§ 44-1528Remedies; injunction; other reliefs; receiverIn force
A. Following an investigation made pursuant to section 44-1524 and when it appears to the attorney general that a person has engaged in or is engaging in any practice declared to be unlawful by this article, the attorney general may seek and obtain in an action in a court of competent jurisdiction an injunction prohibiting the person from continuing the practices or engaging in the practice or doing any acts in furtherance of the practice after notice as is required by the rules of civil procedure. The court may make such orders or judgments as may be necessary to: 1. Prevent the use or employment by a person of any unlawful practices. 2. Restore to any person in interest any monies or property, real or personal, which may have been acquired by means of any practice in this article declared to be unlawful, including the appointment of a receiver. 3. Require that any profits, gain, gross receipts or other benefit obtained by means of any practice in this article declared to be unlawful be disgorged and paid to the state for deposit in the consumer remediation subaccount of the consumer restitution and remediation revolving fund established by section 44-1531.02. 4.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-04 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at azleg.gov
Arizona Revised Statutes, Title 6 (Banks and Financial Institutions), Chapter 12 (TRANSMITTERS OF MONEY), Article 1 (Money Transmission)
§ 6-1236Cryptocurrency kiosk operator; disclosures; receipt; fraud prevention; refunds; enforcement; definitionsIn force
A. A cryptocurrency kiosk operator shall disclose in a clear, conspicuous and easily readable and understandable manner in the chosen language of the customer all relevant terms and conditions that are generally associated with the products, services and activities of the cryptocurrency kiosk operator and virtual currency. The cryptocurrency kiosk operator shall receive an acknowledgment of receipt of all disclosures required under this section from a customer through confirmation or consent. B. A cryptocurrency kiosk operator shall provide the following disclosures separately in a font that contrasts with the background where the written warning appears and the customer must accept the two separate disclosures before executing a cryptocurrency kiosk transaction: 1. Warning: Consumer fraud often starts with contact from a stranger who is initiating a dishonest scheme or a criminal or fraudulent activity that may appear in many forms, including any of the following: (a) Claims of a frozen bank account or credit card. (b) Claims of a fraudulent bank transaction. (c) Claims of identity theft or an offer of employment in exchange for payment.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-04 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at azleg.gov
Arizona Revised Statutes, Title 46 (Welfare), Chapter 4 (ADULT PROTECTIVE SERVICES), Article 1 (General Provisions)
§ 46-456Duty to a vulnerable adult; financial exploitation; civil penalties; exceptions; definitionsIn force
A. A person who is in a position of trust and confidence to a vulnerable adult shall use the vulnerable adult's assets solely for the benefit of the vulnerable adult and not for the benefit of the person who is in the position of trust and confidence to the vulnerable adult or the person's relatives unless any of the following applies: 1. The superior court gives prior approval of the transaction on a finding that the transaction is for the benefit of the vulnerable adult. 2. The transaction is specifically authorized in a valid durable power of attorney that is executed by the vulnerable adult as the principal or in a valid trust instrument that is executed by the vulnerable adult as a settlor. 3. The transaction is required in order to obtain or maintain eligibility for services under title 36, chapter 29. 4. The person in the position of trust and confidence to the vulnerable adult is the vulnerable adult's spouse and the transaction furthers the interest of the marital community, including applying for benefits pursuant to title 36, chapter 29 or benefits for supplemental security income, medicare or veterans' administration programs. B.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-04 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at azleg.gov
§ 46-454Duty to report abuse, neglect and exploitation of vulnerable adults; duty to make medical records available; violation; classificationIn force
A. A health professional, emergency medical technician, home health provider, hospital intern or resident, speech, physical or occupational therapist, long-term care provider, social worker, peace officer, medical examiner, guardian, conservator, fire protection personnel, developmental disabilities provider, employee of the department of economic security or other person who has responsibility for the care of a vulnerable adult and who has a reasonable basis to believe that abuse, neglect or exploitation of the vulnerable adult has occurred shall immediately report or cause reports to be made of such reasonable basis to a peace officer or to the adult protective services central intake unit. The guardian or conservator of a vulnerable adult shall immediately report or cause reports to be made of such reasonable basis to the superior court and the adult protective services central intake unit. The reports required by this subsection shall be made immediately by telephone or online. B.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-04 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at azleg.gov
Arizona Revised Statutes, Title 12 (Courts and Civil Proceedings), Chapter 5 (LIMITATIONS OF ACTIONS), Article 3 (Personal Actions)
§ 12-541Malicious prosecution; false imprisonment; libel or slander; seduction or breach of promise of marriage; breach of employment contract; wrongful termination; liability created by statute; one year limitationIn forcecited in 4 of our articles
There shall be commenced and prosecuted within one year after the cause of action accrues, and not afterward, the following actions: 1. For malicious prosecution, or for false imprisonment, or for injuries done to the character or reputation of another by libel or slander. 2. For damages for seduction or breach of promise of marriage. 3. For breach of an oral or written employment contract including contract actions based on employee handbooks or policy manuals that do not specify a time period in which to bring an action. 4. For damages for wrongful termination. 5. Upon a liability created by statute, other than a penalty or forfeiture.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-04 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at azleg.gov
Cited in 204 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Alaface v. National Investment Co. (Court of Appeals of Arizona 1994, 181 Ariz. 586)“…nitiated within one year after the cause of action accrues. A.R.S. § 12-541(3); Murry v. Western Am. Mortgage Co.,…”
- Stewart v. Fahey (Court of Appeals of Arizona 1971, 14 Ariz. App. 149)“…relief were barred by the one-year statute of limitations (A.R.S. § 12-541) and that the filing of a lis pendens w…”
- Skydive Arizona, Inc. v. Hogue (Court of Appeals of Arizona 2015, 238 Ariz. 357)“…e barred by the one-year statute of limitations provided in A.R.S. § 12-541(5). Hogue contended that because the La…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Arizona Dog Bite Laws: Liability and Victim Rights, Arizona Defamation Laws: Libel, Slander & Suing (2026), Arizona Statute of Limitations: Filing Deadlines by Case Type
§ 12-543Oral debt; stated or open account; relief on ground of fraud or mistake; three year limitationIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
There shall be commenced and prosecuted within three years after the cause of action accrues, and not afterward, the following actions: 1. For debt where the indebtedness is not evidenced by a contract in writing. 2. Upon stated or open accounts other than such mutual and current accounts as concern the trade of merchandise between merchant and merchant, their factors or agents, but no item of a stated or open account shall be barred so long as any item thereof has been incurred within three years immediately prior to the bringing of an action thereon. 3. For relief on the ground of fraud or mistake, which cause of action shall not be deemed to have accrued until the discovery by the aggrieved party of the facts constituting the fraud or mistake.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-04 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at azleg.gov
Cited in 165 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Gust, Rosenfeld & Henderson v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America (Arizona Supreme Court 1995, 182 Ariz. 586)“…eved party of the facts constituting the fraud or mistake." A.R.S. § 12-543(3). *592 This is that sort of case.…”
- Skydive Arizona, Inc. v. Hogue (Court of Appeals of Arizona 2015, 238 Ariz. 357)“…Circuit had already ruled that the analogous state law was A.R.S. § 12-543, Arizona’s fraud statute. The trial cou…”
- Woodward v. Chirco Const. Co., Inc. (Court of Appeals of Arizona 1984, 141 Ariz. 520)“…ading “Contract statutes versus tort statutes” (in Arizona, A.R.S. § 12-543 or A.R.S. § 12 — 548 versus A.R.S. § 12…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Arizona Debt Collection Laws: The 10% Garnishment Cap, Statute of Limitations, and Repossession
Arizona Revised Statutes, Title 46 (Welfare), Chapter 4 (ADULT PROTECTIVE SERVICES), Article 2 (Financial Exploitation)
§ 46-473Delaying disbursements or transactions; immunityIn force
A. A broker-dealer or investment adviser may delay a disbursement or transaction from an account of an eligible adult or an account on which an eligible adult is a beneficiary if both: 1. The broker-dealer, investment adviser or qualified individual reasonably believes, after initiating an internal review of the requested disbursement or transaction and the suspected financial exploitation, that the requested disbursement or transaction may result in financial exploitation of an eligible adult. 2. The broker-dealer or investment adviser does all of the following: (a) Immediately, but not more than two business days after the delayed disbursement or transaction, provides written notification of the delay and the reason for the delay to all parties authorized to transact business on the account, unless any party is reasonably believed to have engaged in suspected or attempted financial exploitation of the eligible adult. (b) Immediately, but not more than two business days after the delayed disbursement or transaction, notifies adult protective services and the corporation commission.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-04 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at azleg.gov
Arizona Revised Statutes, Title 13 (Criminal Code), Chapter 18 (THEFT)
§ 13-1802Theft; classification; definitionsIn force
A. A person commits theft if, without lawful authority, the person knowingly: 1. Controls property of another with the intent to deprive the other person of such property; or 2. Converts for an unauthorized term or use services or property of another entrusted to the defendant or placed in the defendant's possession for a limited, authorized term or use; or 3. Obtains services or property of another by means of any material misrepresentation with intent to deprive the other person of such property or services; or 4. Comes into control of lost, mislaid or misdelivered property of another under circumstances providing means of inquiry as to the true owner and appropriates such property to the person's own or another's use without reasonable efforts to notify the true owner; or 5. Controls property of another knowing or having reason to know that the property was stolen; or 6. Obtains services known to the defendant to be available only for compensation without paying or an agreement to pay the compensation or diverts another's services to the person's own or another's benefit without authority to do so; or 7.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-04 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at azleg.gov
Arizona Revised Statutes, Title 13 (Criminal Code), Chapter 23 (ORGANIZED CRIME, FRAUD AND TERRORISM)
§ 13-2310Fraudulent schemes and artifices; classification; definitionIn force
A. Any person who, pursuant to a scheme or artifice to defraud, knowingly obtains any benefit by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, promises or material omissions is guilty of a class 2 felony. B. Reliance on the part of any person shall not be a necessary element of the offense described in subsection A of this section. C. A person who is convicted of a violation of this section that involved a benefit with a value of one hundred thousand dollars or more or the manufacture, sale or marketing of opioids is not eligible for suspension of sentence, probation, pardon or release from confinement on any basis except pursuant to section 31-233, subsection A or B until the sentence imposed by the court has been served, the person is eligible for release pursuant to section 41-1604.07 or the sentence is commuted. D. This state shall apply the aggregation prescribed by section 13-1801, subsection B to violations of this section in determining the applicable punishment. E. For the purposes of this section, "scheme or artifice to defraud" includes a scheme or artifice to deprive a person of the intangible right of honest services.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-04 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at azleg.gov
Arizona Revised Statutes, Title 44 (Trade and Commerce), Chapter 15 (HOME SOLICITATIONS AND REFERRAL SALES), Article 1 (In General)
§ 44-5002Cancellation period; method of cancellation; intent; waiver voidIn force
A. In addition to any right otherwise to revoke an offer, the buyer may cancel a home solicitation sale until midnight of the third business day after the day on which the buyer signs an agreement subject to the provisions of this chapter. For the purposes of this chapter, "business day" does not include Sundays or the federal holidays of New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Columbus Day, Veterans' Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Day, or Washington's Birthday. B. Cancellation shall occur when the buyer gives written notice of cancellation in person or by telegram to the seller at the address specified for notice of cancellation provided by the seller or when such written notice bearing such address is deposited in the United States mail by either ordinary mail or registered mail. C. Notice of cancellation given by the buyer is effective if it indicates the intention on the part of the buyer not to be bound by the home solicitation sale. D. Any provision of a contract, offer or agreement that waives a buyer's right of cancellation under this section is void and has no effect.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-04 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at azleg.gov
Arizona Revised Statutes, Title 22 (Justice and Municipal Courts), Chapter 5 (SMALL CLAIMS DIVISIONS OF JUSTICE COURTS), Article 1 (General Provisions)
§ 22-503Jurisdiction; exceptionsIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
A. The small claims division has concurrent original jurisdiction with the justice court in all civil actions in which the debt, damage, tort, injury or value of the personal property claims either by the plaintiff or defendant does not exceed $5,000, exclusive of interest and costs, and in actions in which a party seeks to disaffirm, avoid or rescind a contract, or seeks equitable relief, and the amount at issue does not exceed $5,000. B. The small claims division does not have jurisdiction over the following: 1. Those matters excluded from justice court jurisdiction as provided in section 22-201. 2. Actions involving claims of defamation by libel or slander. 3. Actions in forcible entry, forcible detainer or unlawful detainer. 4. Actions for specific performance. 5. Actions brought or defended on behalf of a class. 6. Actions requesting or involving prejudgment remedies. 7. Actions involving injunctive relief. 8. Traffic violations and other criminal matters. 9. Actions against this state, its political subdivisions or an officer or employee of the state or its political subdivisions in his official capacity.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-04 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at azleg.gov
Cited in 3 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2021
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Peterson v. Newton (Court of Appeals of Arizona 2013, 232 Ariz. 593)“…endant does not exceed two thousand five hundred dollarS[.” A.R.S. § 22-503(A). Decisions from that court are not a…”
- Clusiau v. Clusiau Enterprises, Inc. (Court of Appeals of Arizona 2010, 225 Ariz. 247)“…over civil actions involving claims not exceeding $2,500. AR.S. § 22-503(A) (2002). Small claims court procedure…”
- Fowler v. T-Mobile USA Incorporated (District Court, D. Arizona 2021)“…actions seeking damages in an amount greater than $3,500. A.R.S. § 22-503. 17 Given that Plaintiff has not so…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- A.R.S. § 44-1522, Unlawful practices (Consumer Fraud Act)(azleg.gov).gov
- Sellinger v. Freeway Mobile Home Sales, Inc., 110 Ariz. 573, 521 P.2d 1119 (Ariz. 1974)(courtlistener.com)
- A.R.S. § 44-1533, Remedies not exclusive(azleg.gov).gov
- Arizona Attorney General, Consumer complaints(azag.gov).gov
- A.R.S. § 12-543, Three-year limitation (fraud)(azleg.gov).gov
- A.R.S. § 6-1236, Cryptocurrency kiosk operators(azleg.gov).gov
- A.R.S. § 46-456, Duty to vulnerable adults; civil action(azleg.gov).gov
- A.R.S. § 46-473, Delay of disbursements (broker-dealers and investment advisers)(azleg.gov).gov
- A.R.S. § 22-503, Small claims jurisdiction(azleg.gov).gov
- Arizona Attorney General, Cryptocurrency kiosks(azag.gov).gov
- Arizona Corporation Commission, Securities Division shares how new crypto ATM fraud laws protect Arizona seniors (Sept. 29, 2025)(azcc.gov).gov
- Arizona Department of Insurance and Financial Institutions, File a complaint(difi.az.gov).gov
- Arizona DES, Report abuse (Adult Protective Services)(des.az.gov).gov
- A.R.S. § 44-1521, Definitions (Consumer Fraud Act)(azleg.gov).gov
- A.R.S. § 44-1534, Recovery of costs (Attorney General)(azleg.gov).gov
- A.R.S. § 44-1528, Injunction; restoration; receivers(azleg.gov).gov
- A.R.S. § 44-1531, Civil penalties(azleg.gov).gov
- A.R.S. § 12-541, One-year limitation (liability created by statute)(azleg.gov).gov
- A.R.S. § 46-451, Definitions (vulnerable adult)(azleg.gov).gov
- A.R.S. § 13-1802, Theft(azleg.gov).gov
- A.R.S. § 13-2310, Fraudulent schemes and artifices(azleg.gov).gov
- A.R.S. § 46-454, Duty to report(azleg.gov).gov
- A.R.S. § 46-453, Immunity of participants(azleg.gov).gov
- DOJ Office for Victims of Crime, National Elder Fraud Hotline(ovc.ojp.gov).gov
- A.R.S. § 44-5002, Cancellation of home solicitation sale(azleg.gov).gov
- A.R.S. § 44-5001, Definitions (home solicitation sales)(azleg.gov).gov
- A.R.S. § 13-2919, Automated dialing and recorded solicitations(azleg.gov).gov
- Alaface v. National Investment Co., 181 Ariz. 586, 892 P.2d 1375 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1994)(courtlistener.com)