Indiana
Indiana Medical Records Retention Laws (2026 Guide)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 18, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 18, 2026. · 8 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Indiana law requires all licensed healthcare providers to retain patient medical records for a minimum of seven years under IC 16-39-7-1, which does not set a separate rule for minor patients. Many providers nonetheless extend retention for minors until the patient turns 21 or for seven years after the last service, whichever period is longer, as a common risk-management practice rather than a distinct statutory mandate.
Last verified: September 2026 against the Indiana Code 2026 text of IC 16-39-7 and IC 16-39-9, including the changes made by P.L.215-2025. This page also reflects Indiana Administrative Code Title 410, Article 15.

Table of Contents
- Overview of Indiana Medical Records Retention Laws
- How Long Must Providers Keep Medical Records in Indiana
- Hospital vs. Physician Retention Requirements
- Retention Rules for Minor Patients' Records
- X-Ray, Mammogram, and Imaging Record Retention
- Federal Requirements: HIPAA and CMS
- Patient Access to Medical Records in Indiana
- Copying Fees for Medical Records
- Proper Destruction of Medical Records
- Practice Closure and Record Transfer Requirements
- Indiana's Abandoned Health Records Act
- Penalties for Non-Compliance
- Frequently Asked Questions
- Sources and References
Overview of Indiana Medical Records Retention Laws
Indiana law sets clear minimum periods for how long healthcare providers must keep patient medical records. The primary statute governing retention is Indiana Code 16-39-7-1, which applies to hospitals, physicians, dentists, nurses, and all other licensed healthcare providers in the state.
The law requires providers to maintain original health records or microfilm copies for at least seven years. This requirement applies across the board to every type of licensed healthcare provider operating in Indiana, whether they run a large hospital system or a solo medical practice.
Indiana also imposes additional requirements through the Indiana Administrative Code (410 IAC 15-1.5-4), which governs hospital licensure and medical record services. These administrative rules work alongside the state statutes to form a comprehensive regulatory framework for medical records management.
Providers who fail to meet these retention requirements face disciplinary sanctions from their licensing boards. In addition, federal laws including HIPAA and CMS participation requirements may impose additional obligations on top of Indiana's state law minimums.
How Long Must Providers Keep Medical Records in Indiana
Indiana Code 16-39-7-1(b) requires all healthcare providers to maintain the original health records or microfilms of those records for a minimum of seven (7) years. This is the baseline retention period that applies to all provider types.
The seven-year clock typically begins from the date of the patient's last treatment or encounter. However, several situations require longer retention.
Standard Retention Periods in Indiana:
| Record Type | Minimum Retention | Governing Law |
|---|---|---|
| General health records | 7 years | IC 16-39-7-1 |
| X-ray films | 5 years | IC 16-39-7-2 |
| Mammograms (original films) | 5 years, or 10 years if the provider performs no additional mammograms | IC 16-39-7-3 |
| Minor patient records (common practice) | Until age 21 or 7 years, whichever is longer | Not a distinct IC 16-39-7-1 requirement; recommended practice |
| Medicaid records | 7 years from date of service | 405 IAC 1-1.4-2 |
| Medicare records | 7 years from date of service | 42 CFR 424.516(f) |
Providers should note that if a patient requests their records during the retention period, the provider must accommodate that request within 30 days under IC 16-39-1-1. Transferring records to a patient or another provider does not relieve the original provider of their retention obligations for any copies they retain.
Hospital vs. Physician Retention Requirements
While the seven-year minimum under IC 16-39-7-1 applies to both hospitals and individual physicians, these two provider types face different regulatory frameworks that create distinct compliance obligations.
Hospital Requirements
Hospitals licensed in Indiana must comply with 410 IAC 15-1.5-4, which governs medical record services as part of hospital licensure. This regulation requires:
- Medical record services directed by a Registered Health Information Administrator (RHIA) or Registered Health Information Technician (RHIT)
- Records retained in their original or legally reproduced form as required by federal and state law
- Patient identification data, diagnostic and therapeutic orders, and authentication of all entries
- Discharge summaries authenticated by the attending physician
- Procedures for releasing records only to authorized individuals under federal and state law
Hospitals that participate in Medicare must also meet the federal Conditions of Participation under 42 CFR 482.24, which requires maintaining a medical record for every inpatient and outpatient. These records must be accurately written, promptly completed, properly filed and retained, and accessible.
Physician Requirements
Physicians in private practice are subject to the same seven-year retention requirement under IC 16-39-7-1. They are also regulated by the Indiana Medical Licensing Board under 844 IAC 5-2, which sets professional standards for medical record keeping.
Physicians must maintain records that contain sufficient information to identify the patient, support the diagnosis, justify the treatment, and document the course and results of care. Solo practitioners and small practices bear full responsibility for establishing secure storage systems and ensuring records remain accessible throughout the entire retention period.
Both hospitals and physicians must ensure their records are legible, complete, and authenticated by the responsible provider. Electronic health records (EHR) systems are acceptable, but providers must have procedures to ensure accurate and complete reproduction of original documents.
Retention Rules for Minor Patients' Records
IC 16-39-7-1 does not create a separate minor-patient retention rule; it applies the same seven-year minimum to every patient regardless of age. Many Indiana providers nonetheless retain records for minor patients until the patient reaches the age of 21 or for seven years after the date of the last service, whichever period is longer, as a widely recommended risk-management practice.
This extended retention period recognizes two important legal realities. First, minors cannot bring legal actions on their own behalf. Second, Indiana's medical malpractice statute of limitations under IC 34-18-7-1 allows minors under the age of six to file claims until their eighth birthday. Retaining records through at least age 21 ensures documentation remains available through the period when a former minor patient could potentially bring a claim.
Practical Examples:
- A child seen at age 2 in 2026 would have records retained until at least 2045 (age 21)
- A child seen at age 16 in 2026 would have records retained until at least 2033 (7 years after service, since that extends past age 21)
- A child seen at age 10 in 2026 would have records retained until at least 2037 (age 21, since that is longer than 7 years from service)
Healthcare providers who treat pediatric patients should implement tracking systems to manage these variable retention deadlines. Many facilities use EHR systems that automatically flag records approaching their retention expiration dates.
X-Ray, Mammogram, and Imaging Record Retention
Indiana Code 16-39-7-2 establishes retention requirements for x-ray images. Original mammograms are addressed separately, under IC 16-39-7-3, which IC 16-39-7-2 expressly excludes from its own scope.
X-Ray Films
Providers must retain a patient's x-ray image for at least five years under IC 16-39-7-2(c). "X-ray image" is defined in IC 16-39-7-2(b) to include a microfilm copy of an x-ray film and a digital image of an x-ray.
At the time the x-ray image is taken, IC 16-39-7-2(d) requires the provider to do one of two things, not both. The provider may inform the patient in writing that the image will be kept on file for at least five years and that the patient may request a copy during that period at no cost, as provided in IC 16-39-1-2. Alternatively, the provider may have a sign posted conspicuously in the x-ray examination area telling patients the same two things. A conspicuously posted sign satisfies the requirement on its own, so a provider that posts one is not additionally obligated to give each patient written notice.
Mammogram Films
Mammogram retention is governed separately from x-ray retention. IC 16-39-7-2 states in its opening subsection that it does not apply to original mammograms, which are governed by IC 16-39-7-3 instead.
Under IC 16-39-7-3(a), a provider must maintain a patient's original mammogram films, and the reports concerning those films, in the patient's permanent medical record for not less than five (5) years after the date the original films were taken. That minimum rises to not less than ten (10) years if the provider performs no additional mammograms of the patient.
IC 16-39-7-3(b) also requires a provider, on request by or on behalf of the patient, to transfer the original films and copies of any reports to a medical institution, to a physician or other health care provider of the patient, or to the patient. Any fee charged for that transfer may not exceed the provider's actual cost under IC 16-39-7-3(c). Under IC 16-39-7-3(d), the provider must inform the patient in writing, at the time the mammogram is taken, how long the original films will be maintained and how to obtain them.
Historical mammograms remain valuable for comparison in breast cancer screening, so many providers retain them well beyond these statutory minimums.
Digital Imaging
Modern healthcare facilities increasingly store imaging records in digital formats such as DICOM files in Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS). Indiana law permits digital storage as long as the system can produce accurate and complete reproductions of the original records. The same minimum retention periods apply regardless of storage format.
Federal Requirements: HIPAA and CMS
Indiana providers must comply with federal requirements in addition to state law. When federal and state requirements differ, the stricter standard applies.
HIPAA Documentation Requirements
Contrary to a common misconception, HIPAA does not mandate specific retention periods for medical records. According to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the HIPAA Privacy Rule defers to state law on how long medical records must be retained.
However, HIPAA does require covered entities to retain HIPAA-related documentation for six years. Under 45 CFR 164.530(j), this includes privacy policies, procedures, patient authorizations, training records, complaints, and breach notifications. This is a documentation retention requirement, not a medical record retention requirement.
Because Indiana's seven-year requirement exceeds HIPAA's six-year documentation standard, Indiana providers who follow state law will automatically satisfy the HIPAA documentation timeline as well.
CMS and Medicare Requirements
Providers who participate in Medicare or Medicaid face additional federal requirements. Under 42 CFR 424.516(f), Medicare providers must maintain medical records for seven years from the date of service.
For hospitals, CMS Conditions of Participation (42 CFR 482.24) require maintaining a complete medical record for every inpatient and outpatient. Records must be accurately written, promptly completed, properly filed and retained, and accessible for authorized use.
Failure to maintain adequate medical records can result in revocation of Medicare enrollment under 42 CFR 424.535(a)(10), which would prevent the provider from billing Medicare for any services.
Indiana Medicaid similarly requires providers to maintain records for at least seven years from the date of service under 405 IAC 1-1.4-2. These records must fully describe the scope and extent of treatment provided.
Patient Access to Medical Records in Indiana
Indiana Code 16-39-1-1 grants patients the right to access their own medical records. Upon written request and reasonable notice, a provider must supply the patient with their health records.
Providers must fulfill the request within 30 days of receiving it. If the provider needs additional time, they may seek an extension of up to 30 additional days, but must notify the patient of the extension within the initial 30-day window.
Patients may request either their complete health record or only the portions relating to a specific condition. The provider must accommodate the patient's preference.
For records of minor patients, IC 16-39-1-7 grants both custodial and noncustodial parents equal access to a child's medical records, unless a court order restricts that access.
Under HIPAA's Right of Access provision (45 CFR 164.524), patients also have the right to obtain copies of their protected health information in electronic format when records are maintained electronically. Providers who deny access without a valid legal reason may face enforcement action from the HHS Office for Civil Rights.
Copying Fees for Medical Records
Indiana Code 16-39-9 governs what a provider or medical records company may charge for copies of medical records. The chapter no longer carries its own dollar figures. The per-page schedule that used to sit at IC 16-39-9-3 was repealed by P.L.173-2007, SEC.47, so any fee table presented as the Indiana Code schedule is quoting a section that has not been law since 2007. What the chapter does now is set two separate rules, one for electronic copies and one for paper.
Electronic Copies Are Free
Under IC 16-39-9-2(1), as amended by P.L.215-2025, SEC.27, a provider may not charge a person for providing a digital copy, or digital access through an interoperability platform, of an individual's electronic health record.
IC 16-39-9-1.5, added by P.L.215-2025, SEC.26, defines an electronic health record as a record of an individual's medical history that is created, generated, sent, communicated, received, or stored by electronic means, and states that the term includes billing statements and other administrative records that may be provided through electronic means.
The practical effect for patients is direct. If your provider keeps your records electronically and you ask for them in electronic form, or through an interoperability platform, the copy is free. A per-page charge for that request is not permitted.
Paper Copies Are Capped by Rule, Not by Statute
IC 16-39-9-2(2) provides that a provider may not charge for making and providing paper copies of medical records at an amount greater than the amount set in rules adopted by the department of insurance under IC 16-39-9-4.
That means the current maximum paper-copy charges live in the Indiana Department of Insurance rule at 760 IAC 1-71, not in the Indiana Code, and the Department may revise them. IC 16-39-9-4(c) directs the Department to weigh labor costs for verifying, logging, retrieving, copying, and refiling requests, along with software, copying, capital, billing, and space costs, when it sets those amounts. Anyone who needs the figures currently in force should read the Department of Insurance rule itself rather than rely on a schedule published elsewhere, because a secondhand table can go stale the moment the rule is amended.
IC 16-39-9-1 also exempts x-rays covered by IC 16-39-1-2 or IC 16-39-7-2 from this chapter entirely. A patient copy of an x-ray image is handled under those sections, at no cost to the patient.
These limits apply to patient requests. Providers responding to subpoenas, insurance company requests, or attorney requests may be subject to different fee structures depending on the context.
Proper Destruction of Medical Records
Once records reach the end of their required retention period, Indiana providers must still follow specific protocols for destruction to protect patient privacy.
HIPAA requires that all protected health information (PHI) be destroyed in a manner that renders it unreadable, indecipherable, and impossible to reconstruct. The HHS Office for Civil Rights recommends the following destruction methods:
For Paper Records:
- Shredding using cross-cut or micro-cut shredders
- Burning in a controlled environment
- Pulping or pulverizing
For Electronic Records:
- Clearing (overwriting data on the media)
- Purging (degaussing or using secure erase commands)
- Physical destruction (pulverizing, melting, or incinerating storage media)
Providers who use third-party destruction services must execute a HIPAA Business Associate Agreement (BAA) with the vendor before handing over any records containing PHI. The vendor must certify that destruction was completed in compliance with HIPAA standards.
Indiana providers should maintain a destruction log documenting the date of destruction, the method used, the types of records destroyed, and the name of the person or company that performed the destruction. While Indiana law does not explicitly require such a log, it serves as important evidence of compliance during any regulatory audit.
Practice Closure and Record Transfer Requirements
When a physician retires, relocates, or otherwise closes a practice, 844 IAC 5-2-16 imposes specific obligations to protect patients' access to their records.
Patient Notification
Physicians must notify all active patients of the practice closure. The regulation defines an "active patient" as someone the physician examined, treated, cared for, or consulted with during the two years before the discontinuation.
Notification must occur through one of two methods:
- Direct written notice to each active patient, or
- Publication once a week for three consecutive weeks in a newspaper of general circulation in the area where the practice is located
The notification must encourage patients to seek care from another provider and explain how patients can obtain or transfer their records.
Record Transfer Restrictions
Indiana law prohibits physicians from selling, conveying, or transferring patient records for valuable consideration. Records are not a commercial asset that can be monetized during a practice sale.
However, records may be transferred to another physician holding an unlimited license to practice medicine or osteopathic medicine who is assuming the practice. Written notice to patients must be provided when this type of transfer occurs.
Custodian Arrangements
When no successor practitioner is available, the closing physician must make reasonable arrangements for record storage and access. This often involves contracting with a medical records custodian company. Any custodian agreement must include:
- Compliance with HIPAA and state privacy and security laws
- A complete inventory of transferred records
- Description of safeguarding services and response procedures
- A term that satisfies Indiana's retention requirements
- An executed HIPAA Business Associate Agreement
Providers who fail to make adequate arrangements for patient records after closing a practice may face disciplinary action from the Indiana Medical Licensing Board and potential enforcement by the Indiana Attorney General.
Indiana's Abandoned Health Records Act
Indiana Code 4-6-14 gives the Indiana Attorney General authority to intervene when healthcare providers abandon medical records.
Under the statute, records are considered "abandoned" when a provider has voluntarily surrendered, relinquished, or disclaimed them with no intention of reclaiming possession. A 2017 amendment expanded the definition to include records that are recklessly or negligently treated such that an unauthorized person could gain access.
Attorney General's Powers
When the Attorney General determines that records have been abandoned, the AG may:
- Take possession of the abandoned records
- Store, maintain, transfer, and protect the records
- Deliver records to patients or individuals identified in them
- Destroy records after required retention periods have passed
- File a court action to recover costs from the provider who abandoned the records
The Attorney General must make reasonable efforts to notify patients whose records have been taken into state custody. The notice must explain how patients can obtain copies or have their records sent to a new treating provider.
Maintenance and Destruction Timeline
The Attorney General must maintain abandoned records for the shorter of three years from acquisition or the remaining balance of the applicable retention period under IC 16-39-7-1 (seven years for health records), IC 16-39-7-2 (five years for x-ray images), or IC 16-39-7-3 (five years for original mammogram films, or ten years if the provider performs no additional mammograms of the patient).
Financial Accountability
If a court finds that a provider intentionally or negligently abandoned records, the court may order the provider to reimburse the state for all costs incurred in securing, storing, and managing the abandoned records.
Penalties for Non-Compliance
Indiana law provides multiple enforcement mechanisms for providers who fail to maintain medical records as required.
Licensing Board Discipline: Under IC 16-39-7-1(c), a provider who violates the seven-year retention requirement commits an offense for which the applicable licensing board may impose disciplinary sanctions. These sanctions can range from a letter of reprimand to license suspension or revocation, depending on the severity and circumstances.
CMS Enrollment Revocation: Providers participating in Medicare may have their enrollment revoked under 42 CFR 424.535(a)(10) for failing to maintain required medical records. Loss of Medicare enrollment eliminates the provider's ability to bill for Medicare services.
HIPAA Enforcement: Improper destruction or disposal of records containing PHI can result in HIPAA enforcement action under 45 CFR Part 160. Under the current inflation-adjusted tiers at 45 CFR 160.404 (effective January 28, 2026), civil penalties range from $145 to $73,011 per violation depending on culpability, with a calendar-year cap of $2,190,294 per identical violation.
Attorney General Action: Under the Abandoned Health Records Act (IC 4-6-14), the Attorney General may take possession of abandoned records and pursue cost recovery against negligent providers.
Disaster Exception: Indiana law does provide one important exception. Under IC 16-39-7-1, a provider is immune from civil liability for destroying or failing to maintain a health record if the loss occurred in connection with a disaster emergency declared by the governor or another disaster, unless the loss resulted from the provider's own negligence.
Frequently Asked Questions
How long must Indiana healthcare providers keep medical records?
Indiana Code 16-39-7-1 requires all healthcare providers to maintain original health records or microfilms for a minimum of seven (7) years. This applies to hospitals, physicians, dentists, nurses, and all other licensed providers. IC 16-39-7-1 does not set a separate rule for minor patients, but many providers extend retention until the patient turns 21 or for seven years after the last service, whichever is longer, as a common risk-management practice.
What are the medical records retention requirements for hospitals vs. private physicians in Indiana?
Both hospitals and private physicians must retain records for at least seven years under IC 16-39-7-1. However, hospitals face additional requirements under 410 IAC 15-1.5-4 for hospital licensure and 42 CFR 482.24 for Medicare Conditions of Participation. Hospitals must have medical record services directed by a credentialed health information professional (RHIA or RHIT) and maintain detailed inpatient, outpatient, and emergency records.
Can a patient get copies of their medical records in Indiana, and what does it cost?
Yes. Under IC 16-39-1-1, patients have the right to request their medical records in writing, and providers must comply within 30 days. What it costs depends on the format. Under IC 16-39-9-2(1), as amended by P.L.215-2025, a provider may not charge anything for a digital copy, or digital access through an interoperability platform, of an individual's electronic health record. For paper copies, IC 16-39-9-2(2) caps the charge at the amount set by Indiana Department of Insurance rule under IC 16-39-9-4, which is 760 IAC 1-71. The old per-page schedule at IC 16-39-9-3 was repealed by P.L.173-2007, so the figures in force come from the Department's rule rather than from the Indiana Code.
What happens to medical records when an Indiana doctor closes their practice?
Under 844 IAC 5-2-16, physicians must notify all active patients (those seen within the past two years) by direct written notice or newspaper publication for three consecutive weeks. Physicians cannot sell patient records. Records may be transferred to a successor practitioner or placed with a qualified records custodian under a HIPAA Business Associate Agreement. Failure to make proper arrangements can lead to disciplinary action and Attorney General enforcement under the Abandoned Health Records Act (IC 4-6-14).
Does HIPAA require Indiana providers to keep medical records for a specific number of years?
No. HIPAA does not set a minimum retention period for medical records. It defers to state law on that question. HIPAA does require covered entities to retain HIPAA-related documentation (privacy policies, authorizations, training records, breach notifications) for six years under 45 CFR 164.530(j). Because Indiana requires seven-year record retention, providers following state law will exceed the HIPAA documentation timeline automatically.
Updates
Corrected the copying-fee section, which quoted a per-page schedule from IC 16-39-9-3, a section repealed in 2007, and added the 2025 amendment (IC 16-39-9-2(1)) barring any charge for a digital copy of an electronic health record; also stated the mammogram retention period set by IC 16-39-7-3(a) and corrected the x-ray notice rule, which IC 16-39-7-2(d) satisfies by either written notice or a conspicuously posted sign.
Corrected the X-ray copy notice: Indiana law entitles patients to a free copy of their x-ray images during the retention period, not a copy at the provider's cost, and updated the HIPAA civil-penalty figures from the original 2009 amounts to the current January 2026 range.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected 5 statute-attribution/legal-fact errors verified against primary sources.
Replaced a law.justia.com citation link (banned competitor domain) for IC 34-18-7-1 with the official Indiana General Assembly source.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected mammogram retention figures that were wrongly cited to IC 16-39-7-2, which by its own text does not apply to original mammograms and defers to IC 16-39-7-3 instead.
Corrected a remaining reference that grouped mammograms under IC 16-39-7-2; that section's text excludes original mammograms, which are governed by IC 16-39-7-3.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Indiana Code, TITLE 16. HEALTH
§ 16-39-7-1Maintenance of health records by providers; violationsIn force
Sec. 1. (a) As used in this section, "provider" means the following: (1) A physician. (2) A dentist. (3) A registered nurse. (4) A licensed practical nurse. (5) An optometrist. (6) A podiatrist. (7) A chiropractor. (8) A physical therapist. (9) A psychologist. (10) An audiologist. (11) A speech-language pathologist. (12) A home health agency licensed under IC 16-27. (13) A hospital or facility licensed under IC 16-21-2 or IC 12-25 or described in IC 12-24 or IC 12-29. (b) A provider shall maintain the original health records or microfilms of the records for at least seven (7) years. (c) A provider who violates subsection (b) commits an offense for which a board may impose disciplinary sanctions against the provider under the law that governs the provider's licensure, registration, or certification under this title or IC 25.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-07 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at iga.in.gov
Cited in 3 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2020
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Howard Regional Health System v. Gordon (Indiana Supreme Court 2011, 952 N.E.2d 182)“…sment of whether the appropriate standard of care was met. Ind. Code §§ 16-39-7-1 , 34-18-10-22(a). The Gor-dons rightly…”
- Santos Cortez, Fran Cortez, and Norris Choplin Schroeder LLP v. Indiana University Health Inc., Sharon v. Lucich, and Elizabeth Longmuir (Indiana Court of Appeals 2020)“…the appropriate standard of care was met. Ind. Code §§ 16-39-7-1, 34-18-10-22(a). The Gordons rightly…”
- Larry Edward Ruble, Jr., Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Natasha Ruble v. Lori Thompson, M.D. (Indiana Court of Appeals 2012)“…r microfilms of the records for at least seven (7) years.” Ind.Code § 16-39-7-1. After setting forth the statutory lang…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 16-39-7-2Maintenance of x-rays by providers; mammograms; violations; civil liabilityIn force
Sec. 2. (a) This section does not apply to original mammograms, which are governed by section 3 of this chapter. (b) As used in this section, "x-ray image" includes a microfilm copy of an x-ray film and a digital image of an x-ray. (c) A provider shall maintain a patient's x-ray image for at least five (5) years. (d) At the time an x-ray image is taken, the provider shall do one (1) of the following: (1) Inform the patient in writing of the following: (A) The patient's x-ray image will be kept on file by the provider for at least five (5) years. (B) If the patient would like a copy of the x-ray image during that period, the provider will provide the patient with a copy of the x-ray image at no cost, as provided in IC 16-39-1-2. (2) Have posted conspicuously in the x-ray examination area a sign informing patients of the following: (A) All x-ray images will be kept on file by a provider for at least five (5) years. (B) On request during that time, the provider will provide the patient a copy of the patient's x-ray image at no cost to the provider.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at iga.in.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2011
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Howard Regional Health System v. Gordon (Indiana Supreme Court 2011, 952 N.E.2d 182)“…mmograms; violations; civil liability.” P.L. 2-1993, § 22; Ind. Code § 16-39-7-2 (1993). 3 The addition of subsection…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 16-39-1-1Right of access; written requests; deadline for complying with written requestsIn force
Sec. 1. (a) This section applies to all health records except mental health records, which are governed by IC 16-39-2, IC 16-39-3, and IC 16-39-4. (b) This article applies to all health records, except: (1) records regarding communicable diseases, which are governed by IC 16-41-8-1; or (2) records regarding alcohol and other drug abuse patient records, which are governed by 42 CFR, Part 2. (c) On written request and reasonable notice, a provider shall supply to a patient the health records possessed by the provider concerning the patient. Subject to 15 U.S.C. 7601 et seq. and 16 CFR Part 315, information regarding contact lenses must be given using the following guidelines: (1) After the release of a patient from an initial fitting and follow-up period of not more than six (6) months, the contact lens prescription must be released to the patient at the patient's request. (2) A prescription released under subdivision (1) must contain all information required to properly duplicate the contact lenses. (3) A contact lens prescription must include the following: (A) An expiration date of one (1) year. (B) The number of refills permitted.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at iga.in.gov
Cited in 2 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2016
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- E.J., a minor by his mother and father Victor and Lynell Jeffrey v. Paul Okolocha, M.D., Okolocha Medical Corp., and Okolocha Medical, Pain and Weight (Indiana Court of Appeals 2012, 972 N.E.2d 941)“…protected from unauthorized disclosure under Indiana law. Ind. Code §§ 16-39-1-1 et seq. Pursuant to Indiana law, on a p…”
- Meridian Health Services Corporation v. Thomas Martin Bell (Indiana Court of Appeals 2016, 61 N.E.3d 348)“…all health records except mental health records . . . .” Ind. Code § 16-39-1-1(a) (emphasis added). Section 16-…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Indiana Code, TITLE 34. CIVIL LAW AND PROCEDURE
§ 34-18-7-1Limitations periodIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
Sec. 1. (a) This section applies to all persons regardless of minority or other legal disability, except as provided in subsection (c). (b) A claim, whether in contract or tort, may not be brought against a health care provider based upon professional services or health care that was provided or that should have been provided unless the claim is filed within two (2) years after the date of the alleged act, omission, or neglect, except that a minor less than six (6) years of age has until the minor's eighth birthday to file. (c) If a patient meets the criteria stated in IC 34-18-8-6(c), the applicable limitations period is equal to the period that would otherwise apply to the patient under subsection (b) (or IC 27-12-7-1(b) before its repeal) plus one hundred eighty (180) days. [Pre-1998 Recodification Citation: 27-12-7-1.]
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at iga.in.gov
Cited in 49 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Ellenwine v. Fairley (Indiana Supreme Court 2006, 846 N.E.2d 657)“…ice be filed within two years of the al- leged malpractice. Ind. Code § 34-18-7-1(b) (2004). The trial court agreed and g…”
- Smith v. Washington (Indiana Court of Appeals 1999, 716 N.E.2d 607)“…nd was based on a vacated Court of Appeals decision. [4] Ind.Code § 34-18-7-1(b), formally Ind. Code § 27-12-7-1 , p…”
- Mary Alice Manley, and Gary Manley v. Ryan J. Sherer, M.D., and Sherer Family Medicine, P.C. (Indiana Supreme Court 2013, 992 N.E.2d 670)“…years of the allegedly negligent act, omission, or neglect. Ind. Code § 34-18-7-1(b). The defendants claim that the last…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Medical Malpractice Laws in Indiana (2026): Deadlines & Caps, Indiana Statute of Limitations: Filing Deadlines by Case Type
Code of Federal Regulations Title 42
§ 482.24Condition of participation: Medical record services.In forcecited in 52 of our articles
The hospital must have a medical record service that has administrative responsibility for medical records. A medical record must be maintained for every individual evaluated or treated in the hospital. (a) Standard: Organization and staffing. The organization of the medical record service must be appropriate to the scope and complexity of the services performed. The hospital must employ adequate personnel to ensure prompt completion, filing, and retrieval of records. (b) Standard: Form and retention of record. The hospital must maintain a medical record for each inpatient and outpatient. Medical records must be accurately written, promptly completed, properly filed and retained, and accessible. The hospital must use a system of author identification and record maintenance that ensures the integrity of the authentification and protects the security of all record entries. (1) Medical records must be retained in their original or legally reproduced form for a period of at least 5 years. (2) The hospital must have a system of coding and indexing medical records. The system must allow for timely retrieval by diagnosis and procedure, in order to support medical care evaluation studies.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ecfr.gov
Cited in 18 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):United States ex rel. Janssen v. Lawrence Memorial Hospital (2020) held the accurate medical record duty in 42 C.F.R. 482.24 is a generic regulatory requirement that does not establish False Claims Act materiality. United States Ex Rel. El-Amin v. George Washington University (2008) applied 482.24(c) to record completion evidence.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- United States ex rel. Janssen v. Lawrence Memorial Hospital (Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit 2020, 949 F.3d 533)✓A relator alleged the hospital falsified patient arrival times to raise its Medicare quality-program payments. The court held the general duty to keep accurate medical records under 42 C.F.R. 482.24 does not address those programs and cannot show False Claims Act materiality.
- United States Ex Rel. El-Amin v. George Washington University (District Court, District of Columbia 2008, 533 F. Supp. 2d 12)✓Nurse anesthetists claimed the hospital billed Medicare as though anesthesiologists performed whole procedures. Citing the 30-day rule in 42 C.F.R. 482.24(c)(2), the court excluded late-signing evidence, and excluded mass-signing evidence too though (c)(1) made it probative.
- NATIONAL ASS'N OF PSYCHIATRIC HEALTH SYSTEM v. Shalala (District Court, District of Columbia 2000, 120 F. Supp. 2d 33)“…to preexisting recordkeeping requirements, as specified in 42 C.F.R. § 482.24 . 7 . Proposed Rul…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: How Long Do Hospitals Keep Medical Records? (2026), How to Find Old Medical Records Online, Medical Records Retention Laws by State (2026 Guide)
§ 424.516Additional provider and supplier requirements for enrolling and maintaining active enrollment status in the Medicare program.In forcecited in 15 of our articles
(a) Certifying compliance. CMS enrolls and maintains an active enrollment status for a provider or supplier when that provider or supplier certifies that it meets, and continues to meet, and CMS verifies that it meets, and continues to meet, all of the following requirements: (1) Compliance with title XVIII of the Act and applicable Medicare regulations. (2) Compliance with Federal and State licensure, certification, and regulatory requirements, as required, based on the type of services or supplies the provider or supplier type will furnish and bill Medicare. (3) Not employing or contracting with individuals or entities that meet either of the following conditions: (i) Excluded from participation in any Federal health care programs, for the provision of items and services covered under the programs, in violation of section 1128A(a)(6) of the Act. (ii) Debarred by the General Services Administration (GSA) from any other Executive Branch procurement or nonprocurement programs or activities, in accordance with the Federal Acquisition and Streamlining Act of 1994, and with the HHS Common Rule at 45 CFR part 76.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ecfr.gov
Cited in 7 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- United States Ex Rel. Westmoreland v. Amgen, Inc. (District Court, D. Massachusetts 2011, 812 F. Supp. 2d 39)“…recon *52 dition of payment can be found in 42 C.F.R. § 424.516 (a)(1), which states that “CMS enrolls…”
- Johnson v. Kelly (District Court, W.D. Oklahoma 2024)“…care laws, regulations, and program instructions. Id. ¶ 22; 42 C.F.R. § 424.516(a). To that end, a healthcare provider…”
- LILIA GOROVITS, M.D., P.C. v. AZAR (District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania 2021)“…2 Pursuant to 42 C.F.R. § 424.516(d)(1)(ii), Medicare physicians are requ…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Medical Records Retention Laws by State (2026 Guide), Louisiana Medical Records Retention Laws (2026 Guide), Kentucky Medical Records Retention Laws (2026 Guide)
§ 424.535Revocation of enrollment in the Medicare program.In forcecited in 7 of our articles
(a) Reasons for revocation. CMS may revoke a currently enrolled provider or supplier's Medicare enrollment and any corresponding provider agreement or supplier agreement for the following reasons: (1) Noncompliance. The provider or supplier is determined to not be in compliance with the enrollment requirements described in this title 42, or in the enrollment application applicable for its provider or supplier type, and has not submitted a plan of corrective action as outlined in part 488 of this chapter. The provider or supplier may also be determined not to be in compliance if it has failed to pay any user fees as assessed under part 488 of this chapter. (i) CMS may request additional documentation from the provider or supplier to determine compliance if adverse information is received or otherwise found concerning the provider or supplier. (ii) Requested additional documentation must be submitted within 60 calendar days of request. (2) Provider or supplier conduct.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ecfr.gov
Cited in 19 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Zille Shah v. Alex Azar, Secretary, HHS (Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit 2019, 920 F.3d 987)“…at their Medicare privileges were being revoked pursuant to 42 C.F.R. § 424.535(a)(8), the regulation defining “Abuse o…”
- Ahmed v. Sebelius (District Court, D. Massachusetts 2010, 710 F. Supp. 2d 167)“…re enrollment and billing privileges in certain instances. 42 C.F.R. § 424.535 (a). Relevant to this case is the regul…”
- Fayad v. Sebelius (District Court, E.D. Michigan 2011, 803 F. Supp. 2d 699)“…enrollment billing privileges were being revoked based on 42 C.F.R. § 424.535 , which authorizes the revocation of bi…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Florida Medical Records Retention Laws (2026 Guide), Mississippi Medical Records Retention Laws (2026 Guide), Oregon Medical Records Retention Laws (2026 Guide)
Code of Federal Regulations Title 45
§ 164.530Administrative requirements.In forcecited in 40 of our articles
(a)(1) Standard: Personnel designations. (i) A covered entity must designate a privacy official who is responsible for the development and implementation of the policies and procedures of the entity. (ii) A covered entity must designate a contact person or office who is responsible for receiving complaints under this section and who is able to provide further information about matters covered by the notice required by § 164.520. (2) Implementation specification: Personnel designations. A covered entity must document the personnel designations in paragraph (a)(1) of this section as required by paragraph (j) of this section. (b)(1) Standard: Training. A covered entity must train all members of its workforce on the policies and procedures with respect to protected health information required by this subpart and subpart D of this part, as necessary and appropriate for the members of the workforce to carry out their functions within the covered entity. (2) Implementation specifications: Training.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ecfr.gov
Cited in 23 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Surprise v. Innovation Group, Inc. (2013) applied 45 CFR 164.530(c), noting it requires appropriate safeguards but does not specify what they must be, and rejected a wrongful discharge claim resting on it. Baum v. KEYSTONE MERCY HEALTH PLAN (2011) treated the same duty as background to state tort claims and remanded.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Baum v. KEYSTONE MERCY HEALTH PLAN (District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania 2011, 826 F. Supp. 2d 718)✓A lost flash drive exposed health data on 280,000 insured children, and a parent sued in state court for negligence per se. The court held that resting the claim on the HIPAA safeguard rule at 45 C.F.R. 164.530(c)(2)(i) raised no substantial federal question, and remanded.
- Surprise v. Innovation Group, Inc. (District Court, D. Massachusetts 2013, 925 F. Supp. 2d 134)✓An employee fired after complaining that health-information documents went into unsecured trash sued for wrongful discharge. The court read 45 C.F.R. 164.530(c) to require safeguards without prescribing a method, and held HIPAA disposal rules are not well-defined public policy.
- Michael Terpin v. at and T Mobility LLC (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2024, 118 F.4th 1102)“…viders to protect patients’ “protected health information.” 45 C.F.R. § 164.530(c)(1); Moore, 299 Cal. Rptr. 3d at 561.…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Alaska Medical Records Retention Laws (2026 Guide), Arkansas Medical Records Retention Laws (2026 Guide), District of Columbia Medical Records Retention Laws (2026 Guide)
§ 164.524Access of individuals to protected health information.In forcecited in 23 of our articles
(a) Standard: Access to protected health information —(1) Right of access. Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (a)(2) or (a)(3) of this section, an individual has a right of access to inspect and obtain a copy of protected health information about the individual in a designated record set, for as long as the protected health information is maintained in the designated record set, except for: (i) Psychotherapy notes; and (ii) Information compiled in reasonable anticipation of, or for use in, a civil, criminal, or administrative action or proceeding. (2) Unreviewable grounds for denial. A covered entity may deny an individual access without providing the individual an opportunity for review, in the following circumstances. (i) The protected health information is excepted from the right of access by paragraph (a)(1) of this section.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ecfr.gov
Cited in 88 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Webb v. Smart Document Solutions, LLC (2007) held the reduced, cost-based fee in section 164.524(c)(4) applies only when the individual himself requests his records, not a law firm acting as his agent. Ciox Health, LLC v. Hargan (2020) vacated 2016 guidance that extended that patient rate to third-party directives.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Webb v. Smart Document Solutions, LLC (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2007, 499 F.3d 1078)✓A law firm ordered its client's hospital records and was billed a copying company's higher third-party rate; the Ninth Circuit held Section 164.524(c)(4)'s cost-based fee limit applies only when the individual or a personal representative asks, not an attorney acting as agent.
- Evenson v. Hartford Life & Annuity Insurance (District Court, M.D. Florida 2007, 244 F.R.D. 666)✓A therapist refused a subpoena for her psychotherapy notes, citing Section 164.524(a)(1)'s exclusion of those notes from a patient's right of access; the court held that exclusion governs only individual access, not discovery, and ordered the notes produced.
- Ciox Health, LLC v. Hargan (District Court, District of Columbia 2020)“…fee that can be charged for such production. See generally 45 C.F.R. § 164.524. For requests brought by an individual…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: North Carolina Medical Records Retention Laws (2026 Guide), Washington Medical Records Retention Laws (2026 Guide), South Carolina Medical Recording Laws: Patient Rights, HIPAA, and Consent (2026)
§ 160.404Amount of a civil money penalty.In forcecited in 13 of our articles
(a) The amount of a civil money penalty will be determined in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section, and §§ 160.406, 160.408, and 160.412. These amounts were adjusted in accordance with the Federal Civil Monetary Penalty Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990, (Pub. L. 101-140), as amended by the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015, (section 701 of Pub. L. 114-74), and appear at 45 CFR part 102. These amounts will be updated annually and published at 45 CFR part 102.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ecfr.gov
Cited in 2 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Kirstyn Bashaw v. Majestic Care of Whitehall (Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit 2025, 130 F.4th 542)“…de range of civil penalties. See 45 C.F.R. § 160.404. And Nieset testified that Bashaw’s reco…”
- Planned Parenthood Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota v. Daugaard (District Court, D. South Dakota 2021)“…ble diligence, would not have known” about the disclosure. 45 C.F.R. § 160.404(b)(2)(i). While the Unif…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Reporting HIPAA Breaches: Requirements, Timelines, and Process (2026), Texas Medical Records Retention Laws (2026 Guide), Vermont Medical Records Retention Laws (2026 Guide)
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Indiana Code 16-39-7-1: Maintenance of Health Records by Providers(iga.in.gov).gov
- Indiana Code 16-39-7-2: Maintenance of X-Ray Images by Providers(law.justia.com)
- Indiana Code 16-39-1-1: Right of Access; Written Requests(law.justia.com)
- Indiana Code 16-39-9: Charges Permitted for Copies of Medical Records(law.justia.com)
- Indiana Code 4-6-14: Health Records and Identifying Information Protection (Abandoned Health Records Act)(law.justia.com)
- Indiana Code 34-18-7-1: Medical Malpractice Statute of Limitations(iga.in.gov).gov
- 410 IAC 15-1.5-4: Medical Record Services (Hospital Licensure)(law.cornell.edu)
- 844 IAC 5-2-16: Discontinuance of Practice(law.cornell.edu)
- 42 CFR 482.24: CMS Condition of Participation: Medical Record Services(govinfo.gov).gov
- CMS Medical Record Maintenance and Access Requirements(cms.gov).gov
- HHS FAQ: Does HIPAA Require Record Retention?(hhs.gov).gov
- HHS: Disposal of Protected Health Information(hhs.gov).gov
- 45 CFR 160.404 - HIPAA civil monetary penalty tiers(ecfr.gov).gov
- HHS Annual Civil Monetary Penalties Inflation Adjustment, 91 FR 3665 (eff. Jan. 28, 2026)(federalregister.gov).gov
- Indiana Code 16-39-7 (2026): Maintenance of Health Records, X-rays, and Other Tests(iga.in.gov)
- Indiana Code 16-39-9 (2026): Charges Permitted for Providing Copies of Medical Records (IC 16-39-9-3 repealed; IC 16-39-9-2 amended by P.L.215-2025)(iga.in.gov)