Montana
Montana Data Privacy Laws: MCDPA Consumer Rights Guide (2026)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 14, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 14, 2026. · 12 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Montana's Consumer Data Privacy Act (MCDPA), codified at Mont. Code Ann. 30-14-2801, gives residents the right to access, correct, delete, and obtain portable copies of their personal data and to opt out of data sales and targeted advertising. The law covers businesses processing data of 25,000 or more Montana consumers.
Montana has built one of the most layered state privacy frameworks in the country. The Montana Consumer Data Privacy Act (MCDPA), codified at Mont. Code Ann. 30-14-2801 et seq., gives Montana residents substantial control over how businesses collect, use, and sell their personal information. That statute sits on top of something most states lack: an explicit constitutional privacy guarantee.
Article II, Section 10 of the Montana Constitution declares that individual privacy is essential to a free society and may not be infringed without a compelling state interest. That constitutional floor means Montana courts apply stricter scrutiny to government intrusions on personal data than courts in states that rely only on federal Fourth Amendment doctrine.
This guide covers the full MCDPA framework as amended by SB 297 in 2025, Montana's constitutional privacy protection, the Genetic Information Privacy Act, the data breach notification statute, the Montana wiretap law, and what these laws collectively mean for consumers and businesses.
Montana's Constitutional Right to Privacy
Montana is one of about a dozen states with an explicit privacy right written into its constitution. Article II, Section 10 provides:
"The right of individual privacy is essential to the well-being of a free society and shall not be infringed without the showing of a compelling state interest."
That language was adopted in Montana's 1972 constitutional convention, predating most modern data privacy legislation by decades. The provision applies to government action, not private conduct, so it does not independently create claims against businesses. But it shapes how Montana courts interpret privacy statutes and how the legislature has approached the MCDPA.
The constitutional privacy right has been cited in Montana Supreme Court decisions addressing law enforcement access to information, government record-keeping, and the scope of public health reporting requirements. For practical purposes, businesses operating in Montana face a legal environment where privacy is treated as a constitutional value, not merely a regulatory preference.
The MCDPA itself was drafted in that context. Montana's low applicability thresholds, its early recognition of universal opt-out signals, and the relatively broad definition of sensitive data all reflect a legislature that takes the constitutional privacy guarantee seriously.
What Is the Montana Consumer Data Privacy Act (MCDPA)?
The MCDPA was signed into law on May 19, 2023, as Senate Bill 384. It became effective on October 1, 2024, making Montana one of a growing number of states with comprehensive consumer data privacy legislation.

The law was substantially amended by Senate Bill 297, which Governor Gianforte signed on May 8, 2025. Those amendments took effect on October 1, 2025, and lowered applicability thresholds, removed the cure period language from the statute, and added strong protections for minors.
The Montana Department of Justice oversees enforcement through the Office of Consumer Protection.
Who Must Comply With the MCDPA?
Under Mont. Code Ann. 30-14-2803, the MCDPA applies to any person or entity that conducts business in Montana or produces products or services targeted to Montana residents and meets one of two thresholds.
Applicability Thresholds (Updated by SB 297)
The original SB 384 set the threshold at 50,000 consumers. SB 297 lowered it significantly, effective October 1, 2025.
| Threshold | Original (SB 384) | Amended (SB 297) |
|---|---|---|
| General threshold | 50,000 consumers | 25,000 consumers |
| Revenue-based threshold | 25,000 consumers + 25% revenue from data sales | 15,000 consumers + 25% revenue from data sales |
The 25,000-consumer general threshold is among the lowest of any comprehensive state privacy law. More small and mid-sized businesses fall under Montana's requirements than under comparable laws in other states. The consumer count excludes data processed solely for completing payment transactions.
Broader Coverage for Minors' Protections
Sections of the MCDPA dealing with protections for minors apply to any entity that conducts business in Montana or targets Montana residents with commercial products or services, regardless of how many consumers' data it processes. There is no numerical threshold for the children's provisions.
Key Exemptions
The MCDPA exempts certain entities and data types from its requirements:
- Banks, credit unions, insurers, and insurance producers are exempt at the entity level
- Nonprofit organizations are exempt only if they are established to detect and prevent fraudulent acts in connection with insurance
- GLBA-covered data is exempt, though financial institutions that process data outside the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act's scope must comply with the MCDPA for that processing
- HIPAA-covered health information is exempt
- Employment data processed in the context of employment relationships is exempt
- Government agencies are not covered
SB 297 narrowed several of these exemptions. Financial institutions previously had a broader entity-level exemption under the GLBA. The revised law limits that exemption to specific entity types (chartered banks, credit unions, insurers) and only for GLBA-covered activities.
Consumer Rights Under the MCDPA
The MCDPA grants Montana residents five core privacy rights under Mont. Code Ann. 30-14-2808. These rights apply to anyone who qualifies as a "consumer" under the law: an individual who is a Montana resident acting in a personal (not commercial or employment) capacity.

Right to Know and Access
Consumers can confirm whether a business is processing their personal data and request access to that data. Under SB 297, controllers cannot disclose certain sensitive identifiers (social security numbers, government IDs, financial account numbers, passwords, biometric data) in response to access requests. Instead, they must confirm collection with "sufficient particularity."
Right to Correct
Consumers can request that a business correct inaccurate personal data, taking into account the nature of the data and the purposes for processing it.
Right to Delete
Consumers can request that a business delete personal data that the consumer provided or that the business obtained about the consumer.
Right to Data Portability
Consumers can obtain a copy of their personal data in a portable, readily usable format that allows transfer to another entity without hindrance.
Right to Opt Out
Consumers can opt out of three types of data processing:
- Targeted advertising based on personal data obtained from the consumer's activities across nonaffiliated websites
- Sale of personal data to third parties for monetary or other valuable consideration
- Profiling that produces legal effects or similarly significant effects on the consumer
SB 297 expanded the profiling opt-out right by removing the word "solely," meaning the right now covers decisions that involve profiling as a component, not just decisions made entirely by automated systems.
How to Exercise These Rights
Businesses must provide at least one clear method for consumers to submit requests. Controllers must respond to verified requests within 45 days and may extend the response period by an additional 45 days if reasonably necessary, with notice to the consumer. Consumers may designate an authorized agent to submit requests on their behalf.
Universal Opt-Out Mechanism
Since January 1, 2025, the MCDPA has required controllers to recognize universal opt-out preference signals. These signals allow consumers to communicate their opt-out preferences automatically through browser settings or privacy tools like the Global Privacy Control (GPC).
The opt-out mechanism must be consumer-friendly and easy to use. Controllers must be able to accurately determine whether the consumer is a Montana resident and whether the request is legitimate. This requirement places Montana alongside California, Colorado, Connecticut, and other states that have mandated recognition of universal opt-out signals.
Sensitive Data Protections
The MCDPA defines "sensitive data" under Mont. Code Ann. 30-14-2802 and requires heightened protections for it. Controllers may not process sensitive data without first obtaining the consumer's affirmative consent.
Categories of Sensitive Data
Sensitive data includes:
- Racial or ethnic origin
- Religious beliefs
- Health diagnosis or condition
- Sexual orientation
- Citizenship or immigration status
- Genetic data
- Biometric data used for identification purposes
- Data from a known child (under 13)
- Precise geolocation data
The consent requirement for sensitive data is one of the MCDPA's strongest provisions. "Consent" is defined strictly as a "clear affirmative act signifying a consumer's freely given, specific, informed, and unambiguous agreement." General terms of service, pre-checked boxes, and dark patterns do not qualify.
Children's Data Protections
The MCDPA includes layered protections for minors, significantly strengthened by SB 297.

Children Under 13
Personal data from a known child under 13 is automatically classified as sensitive data. Processing it requires prior consent from a parent or guardian.
Teenagers Aged 13 to 16
If a controller has actual knowledge that a consumer is between 13 and 16 years of age (or willfully disregards that fact), the controller must obtain the consumer's consent before selling their personal data or using it for targeted advertising.
All Minors Under 18
SB 297 introduced a "duty of care" standard requiring controllers to exercise reasonable care to avoid a "heightened risk of harm" to any minor under 18 when offering online services, products, or features. Controllers must conduct data protection assessments for online services that present a heightened risk of harm to minors. If the assessment identifies such a risk, the controller must establish and implement a plan to mitigate or eliminate it.
The law does not require age verification or age-gating. Controllers may use commercially reasonable age estimation methods and will not be held liable for erroneous age estimates made in good faith.
Business Obligations
The MCDPA imposes several requirements on businesses that qualify as "controllers" (entities that determine the purpose and means of processing personal data).
Data Minimization
Controllers must limit the collection of personal data to what is "adequate, relevant, and reasonably necessary" for a disclosed purpose. They may not process personal data for purposes incompatible with the disclosed purpose without obtaining additional consent.
Privacy Notice Requirements
Controllers must provide a clear, accessible privacy notice that includes:
- The categories of personal data processed
- The purposes of processing
- How consumers can exercise their rights
- The categories of personal data shared with third parties
- The categories of third parties that receive data
- A clear and conspicuous disclosure if the controller sells data or uses it for targeted advertising
- The date the notice was last updated
SB 297 added requirements that privacy notices must be available in all languages in which the controller offers services and must be accessible to individuals with disabilities. Material changes to privacy practices require consumer notification with an opportunity to withdraw consent.
Data Security
Controllers must implement reasonable administrative, technical, and physical security measures to protect personal data from unauthorized access, use, or disclosure.
Data Protection Assessments
Under Mont. Code Ann. 30-14-2814, controllers must conduct and document data protection assessments for processing activities that present a heightened risk of harm. These include:
- Processing personal data for targeted advertising
- Selling personal data
- Processing sensitive data
- Profiling that presents a foreseeable risk of harm
- Processing data in connection with online services that pose a heightened risk of harm to minors
The Attorney General may require submission of these assessments during an investigation.
Processor Obligations
Processors (entities that process data on behalf of controllers) must follow the controller's instructions and provide appropriate technical and organizational measures to assist with compliance. Processor contracts must include specific provisions regarding data processing, confidentiality, and audit rights.
Enforcement and Penalties
The Montana Attorney General has exclusive enforcement authority over the MCDPA. There is no private right of action, meaning individual consumers cannot sue businesses directly for violations.

Penalties
| Violation Type | Maximum Penalty |
|---|---|
| Each MCDPA violation | Up to $7,500 per violation (see the cross-reference note below) |
| Attorney fees and investigation costs | Recoverable by the AG |
| Injunctive relief | Available |
Montana's statute allows the Attorney General to treat each affected consumer as a separate violation, which means aggregate penalties can be substantial for large-scale data practices that violate the law.
Cure Period Ended October 1, 2025
The original MCDPA (SB 384) gave a business 60 days to correct a noticed violation before the Attorney General could sue, and the 2023 law set that provision to terminate on April 1, 2026. SB 297 got there first. Effective October 1, 2025, SB 297 struck the notice-and-cure subsection out of Mont. Code Ann. 30-14-2817 and repealed the 2023 termination clause, so the right to cure actually ended on October 1, 2025. April 1, 2026 is only the superseded original schedule; for the six months between those two dates there was no cure right, and the current text of 30-14-2817 contains no cure period at all.
One drafting wrinkle belongs in the picture. The penalty section SB 297 enacted, Mont. Code Ann. 30-14-2820(2), makes the $7,500 civil penalty available against a person who violates the part "following the 30-day period described in 30-14-2817(3)." The enacted 30-14-2817(3) is the civil investigative demand subsection, and it describes no 30-day period, so the penalty provision points at a waiting period that does not exist in the section it cites. Businesses should not assume the Attorney General must wait 30 days, and they should not assume the penalty attaches with no waiting period either. Until the legislature repairs the cross-reference or a court reads it, that question is open.
Investigatory Powers
SB 297 expanded the Attorney General's enforcement toolkit by authorizing the use of civil investigative demands under Montana's existing Consumer Protection Act. A 5-year statute of limitations applies to enforcement actions. The AG's Office of Consumer Protection accepts consumer complaints through its online portal.
AG Enforcement Context
The Montana Attorney General's office has been active on technology and privacy issues. AG Austin Knudsen pursued the nation's first state-level TikTok ban under SB 419 (2023), arguing that TikTok's data collection practices posed consumer protection risks under Montana's authority. That ban was enjoined by a federal court and ultimately did not take effect, but the litigation demonstrated the AG's willingness to use consumer protection authority aggressively in the technology sector. With the cure period removed as of October 1, 2025, the MCDPA provides a cleaner enforcement vehicle for data privacy violations.
Montana Genetic Information Privacy Laws
Montana has two layers of genetic privacy protection that operate alongside the MCDPA.

Genetic Information Privacy Act (Title 30, Chapter 23)
The Genetic Information Privacy Act, enacted as SB 351 in 2023 and effective October 1, 2023, governs entities that collect, use, or disclose consumer genetic data, including direct-to-consumer DNA testing companies. It is codified at Mont. Code Ann. Title 30, Chapter 23.
Senate Bill 163 (2025), effective October 1, 2025, expanded the Act to also cover "neurotechnology data" (data generated by measuring the activity of a consumer's central or peripheral nervous system). The same consent, access, deletion, and destruction rights described below now extend to neurotechnology data alongside genetic data, making Montana one of the first states, after Colorado and California, to specifically regulate neural data privacy.
Key requirements under the Act:
- Consent: Entities must obtain initial express consent from consumers before collecting genetic data. Separate consent is required for transferring data to third parties, using data beyond the original testing purpose, retaining biological samples, research, marketing, or selling consumer data.
- Consumer rights: Individuals have the right to access their genetic data, delete it, revoke consent, and request destruction of biological samples.
- Insurance disclosure prohibition: An entity may not disclose a consumer's genetic data to any entity offering health insurance, life insurance, or long-term care insurance without the consumer's express consent.
- Employment prohibition: Genetic data may not be disclosed to any employer without the consumer's express consent.
- Data storage restrictions: Genetic or biometric data of Montana residents collected in-state may only be transferred or stored outside the United States with the resident's consent.
- Security: Covered entities must maintain comprehensive security programs.
The Act includes a clinical research exception for participants in properly conducted trials with informed consent.
Insurer Restrictions (Mont. Code Ann. 33-18 Part 9)
Montana's insurance code separately restricts how insurers use genetic information. Under Mont. Code Ann. 33-18-901 et seq., insurers, health service corporations, and health maintenance organizations may not:
- Require an individual to obtain a genetic test as a condition of insurance coverage (with limited exceptions such as establishing parentage or metabolic screening for newborns)
- Seek genetic information for purposes unrelated to assessing or managing an individual's current health, or in asymptomatic individuals for purposes unrelated to identifiable research
These restrictions do not apply to life insurance, disability income insurance, or long-term care insurance transactions, where federal GINA protections are more limited.
Montana Data Breach Notification Law
Separate from the MCDPA, Montana has a data breach notification statute at Mont. Code Ann. 30-14-1704 that requires businesses to notify residents when their personal information is compromised.
What Triggers a Notification?
A notification is required when there is an unauthorized acquisition of computerized data that materially compromises the security, confidentiality, or integrity of personal information and causes or is reasonably believed to cause loss or injury to a Montana resident.
Good-faith access by an employee or agent of the business does not trigger notification requirements, provided the information is not used improperly or further disclosed.
What Qualifies as Personal Information?
The breach law covers an individual's first name or initial plus last name combined with one or more of the following unencrypted data elements:
- Social Security number
- Driver's license, state ID, or tribal ID number
- Account, credit, or debit card number with any required security code or password
- Medical record information
- Taxpayer identification number
- IRS identity protection personal identification number
Publicly available information from government records is excluded.
Notification Timeline and Methods
Businesses must notify affected Montana residents "without unreasonable delay," consistent with the legitimate needs of law enforcement. Law enforcement may request a delay if notification would impede a criminal investigation.
Acceptable notification methods include:
- Written notice
- Electronic notice (compliant with the federal E-SIGN Act, 15 U.S.C. 7001)
- Telephonic notice
- Substitute notice (if costs exceed $250,000, more than 500,000 people are affected, or insufficient contact information is available)
Substitute notice requires a combination of email, conspicuous website posting, and statewide media notification.
Attorney General Notification
Any business that sends breach notifications to consumers must simultaneously submit an electronic copy of the notice to the Montana Attorney General's Office of Consumer Protection at datab[email protected]. The copy sent to the AG must exclude information that personally identifies individual consumers.
Montana Wiretap and Electronic Communications Law
Montana's wiretap statute, Mont. Code Ann. 45-8-213, prohibits recording a conversation with a hidden electronic or mechanical device without the knowledge of all parties. Montana is not a simple "all-party consent" state. The statute is triggered by two elements: a hidden device and the absence of all-party knowledge. Remove either element and the prohibition does not apply.
The statute includes an announcement exception: once any party audibly warns that a conversation is being recorded, either party may record. No response or acknowledgment from the other party is required.
Violations are a misdemeanor, with penalties starting at up to six months in jail and a $500 fine, increasing with each conviction.
The wiretap statute and the MCDPA operate independently. Businesses that lawfully collect data under the MCDPA may still face wiretap liability if they intercept electronic communications without proper notice. For a full analysis of Montana recording law, see Montana Recording Laws.
Federal Privacy Overlay
Federal privacy laws apply to Montana businesses and residents alongside state law. Key federal statutes include:
TAKE IT DOWN Act (Pub. L. 119-12, signed May 19, 2025): This federal law criminalizes knowingly publishing non-consensual intimate imagery (NCII), including AI-generated deepfakes. Criminal penalties took effect immediately upon signing. Online platforms have until May 19, 2026, to implement takedown processes for reported NCII, with FTC enforcement of the platform obligations.
HIPAA: The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act governs protected health information held by covered entities (healthcare providers, health plans, healthcare clearinghouses) and their business associates. HIPAA-regulated health data is exempt from the MCDPA's scope, but HIPAA's own privacy and security rules apply independently.
GLBA: The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act governs how financial institutions handle consumer financial information. GLBA-covered data is exempt from the MCDPA. Montana's amended exemption covers specific financial entity types (chartered banks, credit unions, insurers) for GLBA-covered activities.
FCRA: The Fair Credit Reporting Act regulates consumer reporting agencies and the use of consumer reports for credit, employment, insurance, and similar decisions. Data subject to the FCRA is exempt from the MCDPA.
COPPA: The Children's Online Privacy Protection Act requires verifiable parental consent before collecting personal information from children under 13. COPPA operates alongside (not instead of) the MCDPA's children's data provisions.
FTC Act Section 5: The Federal Trade Commission can bring unfair or deceptive trade practice claims against businesses that make material misrepresentations about their data practices or fail to implement reasonable security. The FTC's authority applies in Montana regardless of whether the MCDPA applies to a given business.
APRA (American Privacy Rights Act): A federal comprehensive privacy bill was introduced in 2024 and reintroduced as APRA 2.0 in 2025 but had not been enacted as of May 2026. Montana's MCDPA continues to govern absent federal preemption.
How the MCDPA Compares to Other State Privacy Laws
Montana's MCDPA shares a common framework with privacy laws in states like Virginia, Colorado, and Connecticut, but several provisions set it apart.
| Feature | Montana (MCDPA) | Virginia (VCDPA) | Colorado (CPA) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer threshold | 25,000 | 100,000 | 100,000 |
| Revenue-based threshold | 15,000 + 25% revenue | 25,000 + 50% revenue | 25,000 + revenue |
| Universal opt-out required | Yes (Jan. 2025) | No | Yes (Jul. 2024) |
| Cure period | Eliminated (Oct. 2025) | 30 days | Eliminated (Jan. 2025) |
| Minor protections (under 18) | Yes (duty of care) | Limited | Yes (duty of care, eff. Oct. 2025, SB 24-041) |
| Max penalty per violation | $7,500 | $7,500 | $20,000 |
| Constitutional privacy right | Yes (Art. II, Sec. 10) | No | No |
Montana's 25,000-consumer threshold and its constitutional privacy backdrop make it one of the more protective state regimes. The comparison table above covers only the main consumer privacy law; Montana's Genetic Information Privacy Act and wiretap statute add layers that most comparable states lack.
More Montana Laws
Understanding Montana's data privacy laws is important, but the state has many other legal requirements that may affect you. Explore these related guides:
- Montana Recording Laws: Consent Rules and Penalties
- Montana Surveillance Camera Laws
- Montana Background Check Laws
- Montana Medical Records Retention Laws
- Montana Whistleblower Laws
- Montana Statute of Limitations
- Montana AI Meeting Recording Laws
- Montana Alimony Laws
- Montana At-Will Employment Laws
- Montana Car Accident Laws
- Montana Car Seat Laws
- Montana Child Custody Laws
- Montana Child Support Laws
- Montana Common Law Marriage Laws
- Montana Deepfake Laws
- Montana Divorce Laws
- Montana Dog Bite Laws
- Montana Emancipation Laws
- Montana Expungement Laws
- Montana Hit and Run Laws
- Montana Landlord-Tenant Laws
- Montana Lemon Laws
- Montana Security Camera Laws
- Montana GPS Tracking Laws
- Montana Voyeurism Laws
- Montana Police Bodycam Laws
In-depth guides
- What Is the MCDPA? Montana Consumer Data Privacy Act
- MCDPA Consumer Rights: Your Data Privacy Rights
- MCDPA Compliance Checklist for Businesses (2026)
More Montana Laws
Updates
Corrected the end of the MCDPA right to cure to October 1, 2025, when SB 297 struck the notice-and-cure provision and repealed the original April 1, 2026 sunset, and disclosed that the penalty statute still cross-references a 30-day period that the section it cites does not contain.
Corrected the Consumer Rights section to cite and link the actual rights provision (Mont. Code Ann. 30-14-2808, not the Exemptions section it previously pointed to), updated the state-comparison table to reflect Colorado's new under-18 privacy protections (SB 24-041, effective October 2025), noted that Montana's Genetic Information Privacy Act was expanded in 2025 to also cover neurotechnology (neural) data, replaced two dead legislative citation links with verified working sources, and softened an outdated count of states with constitutional privacy rights.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Montana Code Annotated, Title 30
§ 30-14-2808Consumer Personal Data -- Opt-Out -- Compliance -- AppealsIn forcecited in 4 of our articles
30-14-2808. Consumer personal data -- opt-out -- compliance -- appeals. (1) A consumer must have the right to: (a) confirm whether a controller is processing the consumer's personal data and access the consumer's personal data, unless such confirmation or access would require the controller to reveal a trade secret; (b) correct inaccuracies in the consumer's personal data, considering the nature of the personal data and the purposes of the processing of the consumer's personal data; (c) delete personal data about the consumer; (d) obtain a copy of the consumer's personal data previously provided by the consumer to the controller in a portable and, to the extent technically feasible, readily usable format that allows the consumer to transmit the personal data to another controller without hindrance when the processing is carried out by automated means, provided the controller is not required to reveal any trade secret; and (e) opt out of the processing of the consumer's personal data for the purposes of: (i) targeted advertising; (ii) the sale of the consumer's personal data, except as provided in 30-14-2812(2); or (iii) profiling in furtherance of automated decisions that…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at mca.legmt.gov
Also relied on in: MCDPA Consumer Rights: Montana Privacy Rights (2026), What Is the MCDPA? Montana Data Privacy Law (2026), MCDPA Compliance Checklist: Montana Privacy (2026)
§ 30-14-2803ApplicabilityIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
30-14-2803. Applicability. (1) The provisions of this part, excluding 30-14-2811, 30-14-2818, and 30-14-2819, apply to persons that conduct business in this state or persons that produce products or services that are targeted to residents of this state and: (a) control or process the personal data of not less than 25,000 consumers, excluding personal data controlled or processed solely for the purpose of completing a payment transaction; or (b) control or process the personal data of not less than 15,000 consumers and derive more than 25% of gross revenue from the sale of personal data. (2) Sections 30-14-2811, 30-14-2818, and 30-14-2819 apply to persons that conduct business in this state or deliver commercial products or services that are intentionally targeted to residents of this state.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at mca.legmt.gov
§ 30-14-2802DefinitionsIn forcecited in 4 of our articles
30-14-2802. Definitions. As used in this part, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, the following definitions apply: (1) "Adult" means an individual who is 18 years of age or older. (2) "Affiliate" means a legal entity that shares common branding with another legal entity or controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with another legal entity. (3) "Authenticate" means to use reasonable methods to determine that a request to exercise any of the rights afforded under 30-14-2808(1)(a) through (1)(e) is being made by, or on behalf of, the consumer who is entitled to exercise these consumer rights with respect to the personal data at issue. (4) (a) "Biometric data" means data generated by automatic measurements of an individual's biological characteristics, such as a fingerprint, a voiceprint, eye retinas, irises, or other unique biological patterns or characteristics that are used to identify a specific individual.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at mca.legmt.gov
Also relied on in: Montana Employee Monitoring Laws: Workplace Surveillance and Social Media (2026), Montana Biometric Privacy Laws: Collection, Consent & Penalties (2026)
§ 30-14-2814Data Protection AssessmentIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
30-14-2814. Data protection assessment. (1) A controller shall conduct and document a data protection assessment for each of the controller's processing activities that presents a heightened risk of harm to a consumer. For the purposes of this section, processing that presents a heightened risk of harm to a consumer includes: (a) the processing of personal data for the purposes of targeted advertising; (b) the sale of personal data; (c) the processing of personal data for the purposes of profiling in which the profiling presents a reasonably foreseeable risk of: (i) unfair or deceptive treatment of or unlawful disparate impact on consumers; (ii) financial, physical, or reputational injury to consumers; (iii) a physical or other form of intrusion on the solitude or seclusion or the private affairs or concerns of consumers in which the intrusion would be offensive to a reasonable person; or (iv) other substantial injury to consumers; and (d) the processing of sensitive data.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at mca.legmt.gov
§ 30-14-1704Computer Security BreachIn forcecited in 4 of our articles
30-14-1704. Computer security breach. (1) Any person or business that conducts business in Montana and that owns or licenses computerized data that includes personal information shall disclose any breach of the security of the data system following discovery or notification of the breach to any resident of Montana whose unencrypted personal information was or is reasonably believed to have been acquired by an unauthorized person. The disclosure must be made without unreasonable delay, consistent with the legitimate needs of law enforcement, as provided in subsection (3), or consistent with any measures necessary to determine the scope of the breach and restore the reasonable integrity of the data system. (2) Any person or business that maintains computerized data that includes personal information that the person or business does not own shall notify the owner or licensee of the information of any breach of the security of the data system immediately following discovery if the personal information was or is reasonably believed to have been acquired by an unauthorized person.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at mca.legmt.gov
Also relied on in: Montana Data Breach Notification Laws: Reporting Rules & Timelines (2026), Montana Identity Theft Laws: Penalties and the Identity Theft Passport
§ 30-23-104Consumer Genetic Or Neurotechnology Data -- Privacy Notice -- Consent -- Access -- Deletion -- DestructionIn force
30-23-104. Consumer genetic or neurotechnology data -- privacy notice -- consent -- access -- deletion -- destruction. To safeguard the privacy, confidentiality, security, and integrity of a consumer's genetic or neurotechnology data, an entity shall: (1) provide clear and complete information regarding the entity's policies and procedures for the collection, use, or disclosure of genetic or neurotechnology data by making available to a consumer: (a) a high-level privacy policy overview that includes basic, essential information about the entity's collection, use, or disclosure of genetic or neurotechnology data; and (b) a prominent, publicly available privacy notice that includes, at a minimum, information about the entity's data collection, consent, use, access, disclosure, transfer, security, and retention and deletion practices for genetic or neurotechnology data; (2) obtain initial express consent from a consumer, parent, guardian, or power of attorney for the collection, use, or disclosure of the consumer's genetic or neurotechnology data that: (a) clearly describes the entity's use of the genetic or neurotechnology data that the entity collects through the entity's…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at mca.legmt.gov
Montana Code Annotated, Title 45
§ 45-8-213Privacy In CommunicationsIn forcecited in 23 of our articles
45-8-213. Privacy in communications. (1) Except as provided in 69-6-104, a person commits the offense of violating privacy in communications if the person knowingly or purposely: (a) with the purpose to terrify, intimidate, threaten, harass, or injure, communicates with a person by electronic communication and threatens to inflict injury or physical harm to the person or property of the person or makes repeated use of obscene, lewd, or profane language or repeated lewd or lascivious suggestions; (b) uses an electronic communication to attempt to extort money or any other thing of value from a person or to disturb by repeated communications the peace, quiet, or right of privacy of a person at the place where the communications are received; (c) records or causes to be recorded a conversation by use of a hidden electronic or mechanical device that reproduces a human conversation without the knowledge of all parties to the conversation; (d) with the purpose to terrify, intimidate, threaten, harass, or injure or to obtain money or other valuable consideration, publishes, distributes, or discloses real or digitally fabricated printed or electronic photographs, pictures, images, or…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at mca.legmt.gov
Cited in 23 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):State v. Dugan (2013) struck the statute's prima facie intent clause as overbroad. State v. Brown (1988) noted the statute still bars recording without all participants' permission and rejected an overbreadth attack on its public-official exception. State v. DuBray (2003) found no violation where the defendant knew of the recording.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Smith (Montana Supreme Court 2004, 322 Mont. 206)✓A man who phoned threats to kill his estranged wife's boyfriend argued he should have been charged under section 45-8-213(1)(a) instead of assault with a weapon. The court held the two statutes punish different conduct, so the charge was within prosecutorial discretion.
- State v. Dugan (Montana Supreme Court 2013, 369 Mont. 39)“…rbroad, the Court today strikes the prima facie language in § 45-8-213, MCA. However, a narrow application would be…”
- In re C.S. (Montana Supreme Court 1984, 210 Mont. 144)“…n of privacy in communication, a misdemeanor as provided in Section 45-8-213, MCA. The facts underlying the offense were…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Montana Recording Laws (2026): Announcement Exception and Penalties, Montana Landlord-Tenant Recording Laws: Camera Rules, Privacy Rights, and Disputes (2026), Montana Security Camera Laws: Home, Business, and Surveillance Rules (2026)
United States Code Title 15
§ 7001General rule of validityIn forcecited in 18 of our articles
Notwithstanding any statute, regulation, or other rule of law (other than this subchapter and subchapter II), with respect to any transaction in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce— a signature, contract, or other record relating to such transaction may not be denied legal effect, validity, or enforceability solely because it is in electronic form; and a contract relating to such transaction may not be denied legal effect, validity, or enforceability solely because an electronic signature or electronic record was used in its formation. This subchapter does not— limit, alter, or otherwise affect any requirement imposed by a statute, regulation, or rule of law relating to the rights and obligations of persons under such statute, regulation, or rule of law other than a requirement that contracts or other records be written, signed, or in nonelectronic form; or require any person to agree to use or accept electronic records or electronic signatures, other than a governmental agency with respect to a record other than a contract to which it is a party.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 132 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Metropolitan Regional Information Systems v. American Home Realty Network (2012) applied 15 U.S.C. 7001(a) to hold an electronic assignment process satisfied the signed writing requirement of Copyright Act 204(a). Blatt v. Capital One Auto Finance (2017) held 7001(c) disclosures were not required where the record was delivered on paper.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Metropolitan Regional Information Systems, Inc. v. American Home Realty Network, Inc. (District Court, D. Maryland 2012, 904 F. Supp. 2d 530)✓Subscribers assigned photo copyrights to a real estate database by uploading images under online terms of use; the court relied on E-SIGN, 15 U.S.C. section 7001, to hold those electronic assignments met the Copyright Act signed-writing rule, and denied reconsideration.
- Cutrone v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (District Court, E.D. New York 2013, 981 F. Supp. 2d 144)✓Homeowners sued MERS in state court over a second mortgage recording tax on an E-Sign mortgage; MERS removed under 15 U.S.C. section 7001, but the court held that statute gives no private right of action and at most a federal defense, which cannot support removal, and remanded.
- Blatt v. Capital One Auto Finance, Inc. (District Court, M.D. Tennessee 2017, 237 F. Supp. 3d 688)“…legal effect ..solely because it is in electronic form[.]” 15 U.S.C. § 7001 (a)(1).. Furthermore, it mandates that…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Mississippi Data Breach Notification Laws: Reporting Rules & Timelines (2026), Mississippi Data Privacy Laws: Breach Notification & Consumer Rights (2026), Nebraska Data Breach Notification Laws: Reporting Rules & Timelines (2026)
Explore the law
This article also draws on these acts and chapters (opening at their first section): Montana Code Annotated, Title 30 § 30-23-101 (Short Title -- Legislative Findings And Declaration Of Purpose)
Related law for further reading — not part of this article’s citations.
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Montana Consumer Data Privacy Act (Mont. Code Ann. 30-14-2803, Applicability)(mca.legmt.gov).gov
- Montana Consumer Data Privacy Act (Mont. Code Ann. 30-14-2802, Definitions)(mca.legmt.gov).gov
- Montana Consumer Data Privacy Act (Mont. Code Ann. 30-14-2814, Data Protection Assessments)(mca.legmt.gov).gov
- Montana Department of Justice, Office of Consumer Protection: Montana Consumer Data Privacy(dojmt.gov).gov
- Montana Department of Justice: Reporting Requirements for Data Breaches(dojmt.gov).gov
- Montana Data Breach Notification Statute (Mont. Code Ann. 30-14-1704)(mca.legmt.gov).gov
- Senate Bill 384 (Montana Consumer Data Privacy Act, Original Text)(dwt.com)
- Senate Bill 297 (2025 MCDPA Amendments, Enrolled Bill Text)(archive.legmt.gov).gov
- Montana Constitution Article II, Section 10: Right of Privacy(mca.legmt.gov).gov
- Montana Genetic Information Privacy Act (Mont. Code Ann. Title 30, Chapter 23)(archive.legmt.gov).gov
- Montana Consumer Genetic Data Privacy (Mont. Code Ann. 30-23-104)(mca.legmt.gov).gov
- Montana Genetic Information Privacy in Insurance (Mont. Code Ann. 33-18-901 et seq.)(archive.legmt.gov).gov
- Montana Privacy in Communications (Mont. Code Ann. 45-8-213, Wiretap Statute)(mca.legmt.gov).gov
- TAKE IT DOWN Act (Pub. L. 119-12, signed May 19, 2025): Orrick Legal Analysis(orrick.com)
- Perkins Coie: Montana Consumer Data Privacy Law Update, SB 297 Sweeping Changes at a Glance(perkinscoie.com)
- Future of Privacy Forum: Amendments to the Montana Consumer Data Privacy Act(fpf.org)
- Montana Consumer Data Privacy Act (Mont. Code Ann. 30-14-2817, Enforcement)(mca.legmt.gov)
- Montana Consumer Data Privacy Act (Mont. Code Ann. 30-14-2820, Civil Penalty and Injunction)(mca.legmt.gov)