Montana
Montana GPS Tracking Laws: Is It Legal to Put a Tracker on a Car? (2026)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited June 17, 2026). · Law checked current as of August 9, 2026. How we verify our legal content
Montana protects location privacy more aggressively than most states. Its constitution spells out an explicit right of privacy, and its criminal stalking statute names global positioning devices right in the text of the law.
So is it legal to put a tracker on a car in Montana? On a vehicle you own, yes. On someone else's vehicle, hidden tracking can become criminal stalking under MCA 45-5-220, and the penalties climb to five years in prison when aggravating factors apply.
This guide explains what the statute actually says, who can track a vehicle legally, how AirTags fit in, what penalties apply, and what to do if you find a tracker on your own car.
Is It Legal to Put a GPS Tracker on a Car in Montana?
The answer turns on whose car it is and why you are tracking it.
Tracking your own vehicle is legal. That covers your personal car, a company tracking vehicles it owns, and a parent who holds title to a teenager's car.
Tracking someone else's vehicle without consent is where Montana law bites. Montana does not have a standalone tracking-device statute the way some states do. Instead, secret GPS tracking is prosecuted as stalking when it is part of a pattern of monitoring that frightens the victim or causes substantial emotional distress.
That is not a gap in the law. The stalking statute lists GPS monitoring by name as a way to commit the offense, so prosecutors do not have to stretch older surveillance language to cover modern trackers.
Montana's Stalking Law Names GPS Devices (MCA 45-5-220)
Montana overhauled its stalking statute in 2019 and made minor amendments in 2023, and the modern version was written with tracking technology in mind.
Under MCA 45-5-220, a person commits stalking by purposely or knowingly engaging in a course of conduct directed at a specific person that would cause a reasonable person to fear death or bodily injury, or to suffer substantial emotional distress. The statute's definition of course of conduct includes monitoring or surveilling a person "using any electronic, digital, or global positioning device or similar technological means."
Hiding a tracker on an ex-partner's car and watching where they go sits squarely inside that language. So does following someone through a tracking app, an item finder, or any other location technology.
Two limits are worth understanding:
- It takes a course of conduct. Stalking requires repeated acts. A single placement of a device, standing alone, does not complete the offense. In practice, though, a tracker that keeps reporting someone's location for days or weeks looks to courts like ongoing surveillance, not a single act.
- Constitutionally protected activity is exempt. The statute does not reach lawful protest, newsgathering, or other protected conduct.
Who Can Legally Track a Vehicle in Montana
Several categories of tracking remain legal:
![]()
- Vehicle owners. You can put a GPS device on a car titled in your name. Jointly owned vehicles are murkier: a spouse tracking a shared car may have an ownership defense, but doing it secretly during a separation can still feed a stalking charge or an order of protection if it causes fear.
- Parents and guardians. Tracking your minor child's location, including a car you provide, is lawful parental supervision.
- Businesses tracking their own fleet. Companies can track vehicles they own or lease. Best practice is written disclosure to every driver.
- Lenders and lessors. Financing and lease agreements often include consent to a GPS or starter-interrupt device. That contractual consent makes the tracking lawful.
- Law enforcement with judicial authorization. Police cannot simply attach a tracker to your bumper, as explained below.
The U.S. Supreme Court held in United States v. Jones (2012) that physically installing a GPS device on a vehicle is a search under the Fourth Amendment. Montana went further: under MCA 46-5-110, a government entity may not obtain the location information of an electronic device without a search warrant issued by a duly authorized court. The statute carves out narrow exceptions, including a device reported stolen, a response to an emergency call, the informed consent of the device's owner or user, and a life-threatening situation.
Can My Employer Track My Car in Montana?
Montana has no statute that specifically regulates employer GPS tracking, so the analysis splits by who owns the vehicle.
Employers can generally track company vehicles, especially with a written policy that employees acknowledge. Courts treat the employer's ownership interest and business purpose as legitimate.
Personal vehicles are different. Montana's explicit constitutional right of privacy makes covert tracking of an employee's personal car legally hazardous, and tracking that continues off the clock is the kind of pattern that can cross into stalking territory. The practical standard is simple: employers should get clear written consent before any tracking touches a personal vehicle, and employees should ask to see the policy in writing.
Workplace monitoring rules for audio are stricter still. Montana requires consent from all parties before recording private conversations; see our guide to Montana recording laws.
AirTags and Item Trackers in Montana
Apple AirTags, Tiles, Samsung SmartTags, and similar item finders follow the same rules as hardwired GPS units. The statute's phrase "any electronic, digital, or global positioning device or similar technological means" is broad enough to cover all of them.
Dropping an AirTag into someone's bag, or magnet-mounting one in a wheel well and following their movements, is electronic monitoring under MCA 45-5-220 once it forms a course of conduct that causes fear or substantial emotional distress.
If the tracking crosses state lines, federal law adds another layer. The federal stalking statute, 18 U.S.C. 2261A, reaches the use of any electronic communication service or electronic communication system to monitor or surveil someone in a way that causes substantial emotional distress, and federal prosecutors have used it in tracker cases.
Both Apple and Google now push unwanted-tracker alerts to iPhones and Android phones. If your phone warns you that an unknown tracker is moving with you, treat the alert seriously and follow the steps at the end of this guide.
Penalties for Illegal GPS Tracking in Montana
| Scenario | Charge | Maximum penalty |
|---|---|---|
| First stalking offense | Stalking, MCA 45-5-220 | Up to 1 year in county jail, a fine of up to $1,000, or both |
| Second offense within 20 years, violation of a protective order, use of a weapon, or victim is a minor at least 5 years younger than the offender | Enhanced stalking, MCA 45-5-220 | Up to 5 years in state prison, a fine of up to $10,000, or both |
| Tracking across state lines that causes fear or distress | Federal stalking, 18 U.S.C. 2261A | Up to 5 years in federal prison, more if the victim is injured |
![]()
A sentencing court can also order the defendant to stay away from the victim, and a stalking conviction frequently anchors a long-term order of protection.
Montana's Constitutional Right of Privacy
Montana is one of the few states whose constitution names privacy directly. Article II, Section 10 declares that "the right of individual privacy is essential to the well-being of a free society and shall not be infringed without the showing of a compelling state interest."
Montana courts have read that clause as more protective than the federal Fourth Amendment baseline. For GPS tracking, it matters in two ways.
First, it constrains the government. Combined with MCA 46-5-110, it is why Montana police need judicial signoff before electronic location tracking.
Second, it shapes private disputes. Courts weighing an invasion-of-privacy claim or an order of protection consider the constitutional value Montana places on being left alone, and that weight favors the person who was tracked.
Civil Options and Orders of Protection
Criminal charges are not your only remedy in Montana.
Order of protection. Under MCA 40-15-102, a victim of stalking may petition for an order of protection regardless of their relationship to the stalker. There is no filing fee, you can ask for a temporary order quickly, and the order can prohibit all contact and surveillance. Our guide to Montana restraining order laws walks through the process.
Civil lawsuit. Montana recognizes the common-law tort of invasion of privacy, including intrusion upon seclusion. Secretly tracking someone's movements is the kind of intrusion a reasonable person finds highly offensive, and the state's constitutional privacy right reinforces the claim. Damages can cover emotional distress.
Evidence. Whether you pursue charges, an order, or a lawsuit, the tracker itself, its placement, and its data trail are your central evidence, so preserve everything.
What to Do If You Find a Tracker on Your Car
- Do not smash it or throw it away. The device, its serial number, and its placement are evidence.
- Photograph it where you found it before touching anything: wheel well, bumper, OBD port, under a seat.
- Call local law enforcement and ask for a report documenting the device. Mention MCA 45-5-220 if the officer is unsure that secret tracking can be charged.
- Think about who placed it and why. If you suspect an ex-partner or someone you fear, talk to a victim advocate before confronting them, and consider an order of protection.
- Check your phone too. Review unknown-tracker alerts and shared-location permissions, and look for apps a former partner may have installed.
![]()
If your concern is cameras rather than trackers, different rules apply; see our guide to surveillance camera laws for how video on private property is treated.
For the rules in every other state, see GPS Tracking Laws by State.
Sources
- MCA 45-5-220, Stalking, Montana Code Annotated
- MCA 46-5-110, location information privacy, warrant required for government access, Montana Code Annotated
- MCA 40-15-102, eligibility for an order of protection, Montana Code Annotated
- Montana Constitution, Article II, Section 10, right of privacy
- United States v. Jones, 565 U.S. 400 (2012), Legal Information Institute
- 18 U.S.C. 2261A, stalking, Legal Information Institute
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Statutes change and every situation is different. If you are dealing with tracking or stalking in Montana, contact a Montana attorney or local law enforcement. If you are in immediate danger, call 911.
More Montana Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Is it illegal to put a GPS tracker on someone's car in Montana?
Yes, if you do not own the vehicle and do not have the owner's consent. Montana prosecutes secret vehicle tracking as stalking under MCA 45-5-220 when it is part of a course of conduct that causes fear or substantial emotional distress. A first offense is punishable by up to a year in county jail and a $1,000 fine.
Can I put a tracker on my spouse's car in Montana?
If the car is titled in your name or jointly owned, ownership gives you a partial defense, but secret tracking during a separation or divorce can still support a stalking charge or an order of protection if it frightens your spouse. If the car belongs solely to your spouse, hidden tracking is treated the same as tracking a stranger. Family-law judges also weigh this conduct against you in custody and divorce cases.
Are AirTags illegal in Montana?
Owning and using an AirTag to find your own keys, luggage, or car is legal. Using one to secretly follow a person falls under the stalking statute's electronic monitoring language, exactly like a dedicated GPS unit.
Can my employer track my personal car in Montana?
Not without your consent, as a practical matter. No Montana statute squarely addresses employer GPS tracking, but the state constitution's explicit privacy right and the stalking statute make covert tracking of a personal vehicle legally risky. Employers should obtain written consent and limit tracking to work hours.
Can police track my car without a warrant in Montana?
Generally no. United States v. Jones makes physically installing a tracker a Fourth Amendment search, and MCA 46-5-110 bars a government entity from obtaining the location information of an electronic device without a search warrant issued by a duly authorized court. The exceptions are narrow, covering a device reported stolen, an emergency call response, informed consent, and a life-threatening situation.
Does one hidden tracker count as stalking in Montana?
Placing a device once, by itself, does not complete the offense because stalking requires a course of conduct. But a tracker rarely stays a single act. Continuous location reporting over days or weeks, or a tracker combined with following, repeated calls, or showing up uninvited, gives prosecutors the repeated conduct the statute requires.
What should I do if I find a GPS tracker on my car in Montana?
Leave it in place or store it safely, photograph where it was mounted, and call local law enforcement to make a report. If you suspect a current or former partner, consider petitioning for an order of protection under MCA 40-15-102, which is free to file and can prohibit all surveillance.
Updates
Corrected two miscited Montana statutes: the warrant requirement for government access to an electronic device's location is MCA 46-5-110 (not 46-5-117, which governs license plate readers) and the rule letting a stalking victim petition for an order of protection regardless of relationship is MCA 40-15-102 (not 40-15-201), removed an unsupported 2021 legislative-history claim, and updated all Montana Code links to the current official host.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Montana Code Annotated, Title 45
§ 45-5-220Stalking -- Exemption -- PenaltyIn force
45-5-220. Stalking -- exemption -- penalty. (1) A person commits the offense of stalking if the person purposely or knowingly engages in a course of conduct directed at a specific person and knows or should know that the course of conduct would cause a reasonable person to: (a) fear for the person's own safety or the safety of a third person; or (b) suffer other substantial emotional distress. (2) For the purposes of this section, the following definitions apply: (a) "Course of conduct" means two or more acts, including but not limited to acts in which the offender directly or indirectly, by any action, method, communication, or physical or electronic devices or means, follows, monitors, observes, surveils, threatens, harasses, or intimidates a person or interferes with a person's property. (b) "Monitors" includes the use of any electronic, digital, or global positioning device or similar technological means. (c) "Reasonable person" means a reasonable person under similar circumstances as the victim. This is an objective standard.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-26 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at mca.legmt.gov
United States Code Title 18
§ 2261AStalkingIn forcecited in 53 of our articles
Whoever— travels in interstate or foreign commerce or is present within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, or enters or leaves Indian country, with the intent to kill, injure, harass, intimidate, or place under surveillance with intent to kill, injure, harass, or intimidate another person, and in the course of, or as a result of, such travel or presence engages in conduct that— places that person in reasonable fear of the death of, or serious bodily injury to— that person; an immediate family member (as defined in section 115) of that person; a spouse or intimate partner of that person; or the pet, service animal, emotional support animal, or horse of that person; or causes, attempts to cause, or would be reasonably expected to cause substantial emotional distress to a person described in clause (i), (ii), or (iii) of subparagraph (A); or with the intent to kill, injure, harass, intimidate, or place under surveillance with intent to kill, injure, harass, or intimidate another person, uses the mail, any interactive computer service or electronic communication service or electronic communication system of interstate commerce, or any other…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 350 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Federal appeals courts have construed and upheld Section 2261A. United States v. Walker (2011) read in the course of, or as a result of such travel disjunctively, so pre-travel threats plus resulting fear sufficed. United States v. Amy Gonzalez (2018) held it neither overbroad nor vague and no First Amendment violation as applied.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- United States v. Walker (Court of Appeals for the First Circuit 2011, 665 F.3d 212)✓After emailing threats to his estranged wife, the defendant flew from Michigan to Puerto Rico and was arrested on arrival. The court read the disjunctive phrase in 2261A(1) to cover travel that itself places the target in reasonable fear, and upheld the stalking conviction.
- United States v. Amy Gonzalez (Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2018, 905 F.3d 165)✓Relatives waged a years-long campaign against a mother that ended in a courthouse shooting. The court held 2261A is neither overbroad nor vague because it reaches harassing conduct, and that the mental states it lists are alternative means, not elements; convictions affirmed.
- United States v. Wills (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit 2003, 346 F.3d 476)✓A burglary suspect pursued the witness who identified him at a preliminary hearing; the witness later died. The court held the evidence met each element of 2261A: travel from D.C. to Virginia, intent to harm or harass, and reasonable fear of death; conviction affirmed.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Alabama GPS Tracking Laws: Is It Legal to Put a Tracker on a Car? (2026), Colorado GPS Tracking Laws: Is It Legal to Put a Tracker on a Car? (2026), Florida GPS Tracking Laws: Is It Legal to Put a Tracker on a Car? (2026)
Montana Code Annotated, Title 46
§ 46-5-110Location Information Privacy -- Civil Penalty -- DefinitionsIn force
46-5-110. Location information privacy -- civil penalty -- definitions. (1) (a) Except as provided in subsection (1)(b), a government entity may not obtain the location information of an electronic device without a search warrant issued by a duly authorized court. (b) A government entity may obtain location information of an electronic device under any of the following circumstances: (i) the device is reported stolen by the owner; (ii) in order to respond to the user's call for emergency services; (iii) with the informed, affirmative consent of the owner or user of the electronic device; or (iv) there exists a possible life-threatening situation. (c) Any evidence obtained in violation of this section is not admissible in a civil, criminal, or administrative proceeding and may not be used in an affidavit of probable cause in an effort to obtain a search warrant. (d) A violation of this section will result in a civil fine not to exceed $50. (2) As used in this section, the following definitions apply: (a) "Electronic communication service" means a service that provides to users of the service the ability to send or receive wire or electronic communications.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at mca.legmt.gov
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- MCA 45-5-220, Stalking, Montana Code Annotated(archive.legmt.gov)
- Montana Constitution, Article II, Section 10, right of privacy(archive.legmt.gov)
- United States v. Jones, 565 U.S. 400 (2012)(law.cornell.edu)
- 18 U.S.C. 2261A, federal stalking statute(law.cornell.edu)
- MCA 46-5-110, location information privacy, warrant required for government access(mca.legmt.gov)
- MCA 40-15-102, eligibility for an order of protection(mca.legmt.gov)
- MCA 45-5-220, Stalking, Montana Code Annotated(mca.legmt.gov)
- Montana Constitution, Article II, Section 10, right of privacy(mca.legmt.gov)