EnglishEspañol
Montana flag

Montana

Montana Dog Bite Laws: Liability and Victim Rights

Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 23, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 23, 2026. · 8 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Montana Dog Bite Laws: Liability and Victim Rights

Frequently Asked Questions

Does Montana's strict liability dog bite law apply everywhere in the state?

No. Montana's strict liability statute (MCA 27-1-715) only applies within incorporated cities and towns. If a dog bite occurs in a rural or unincorporated area, the victim must file a negligence claim instead, which requires proving the owner failed to take reasonable care to prevent the attack.

What is the statute of limitations for a dog bite claim in Montana?

Montana gives you 3 years from the date of the injury to file a lawsuit under MCA 27-2-204. This deadline applies to both strict liability and negligence claims. Missing this deadline will almost certainly bar your claim permanently.

Can a dog owner claim comparative negligence in a Montana dog bite case?

Not under the strict liability statute. Montana's dog bite law only recognizes two defenses: provocation and the victim's unlawful presence (trespassing). However, if the case is pursued under negligence (for bites outside city limits or non-bite injuries), comparative negligence may apply under MCA 27-1-702.

What qualifies as a vicious dog under Montana law?

Under MCA 7-23-2109, a vicious dog is one that bites or attempts to bite any human being without provocation, or one that harasses, chases, bites, or attempts to bite any other animal. The statute defines 'animal' to include livestock, service animals, and domestic pets. County governments can adopt ordinances to regulate, restrain, or quarantine vicious dogs.

Can I sue a landlord if a tenant's dog bites me in Montana?

Montana courts have generally held that landlords are not liable for bites by a tenant's dog unless the landlord exercised actual control over the animal. Simply knowing the tenant owned a dangerous dog is typically not enough to create liability, which makes Montana more protective of landlords than many other states.

Injured in Montana? Get a free case review from a personal-injury attorney

If someone else's negligence caused your injury, you may be owed compensation for medical bills, lost wages, and pain and suffering. Get a free, no-obligation review from a Montana personal-injury attorney. Most work on contingency, so there is no upfront cost.

Updates

Corrected the date of the Montana House committee action on House Bill 191, the proposed pit bull restriction, from 2018 to 2009, and restated the committee outcome to match the official legislative record.

Rebuilt the Recent Legislative Changes section: the 2025 amendment (SB 300, Ch. 568) actually created new service-animal protections and expanded the core strict-liability statute and the vicious-dog definition to cover service animals, not the livestock-related change the article previously described. Updated the strict-liability requirements list, the vicious-dog definition, and one FAQ answer to reflect the same change.

Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes

Reviewed and approved by an editor

Sources and References

  1. Mont. Code Ann. § 27-1-715 - Liability of Owner of Vicious Dog(leg.mt.gov).gov
  2. Mont. Code Ann. § 7-23-2109 - Vicious Dog Control(leg.mt.gov).gov
  3. Mont. Code Ann. § 27-2-204 - Tort Actions, General and Personal Injury(leg.mt.gov).gov
  4. Mont. Code Ann. § 27-1-702 - Comparative Negligence(leg.mt.gov).gov
  5. Mont. Code Ann. § 7-23-4101 - Control of Animals Running at Large(leg.mt.gov).gov
  6. Mont. Code Ann. § 7-23-2108 - County Control of Dogs(leg.mt.gov).gov
  7. Montana Administrative Rule 32.3.213 - Special Requirements for Dogs and Cats(rules.mt.gov).gov
  8. Mont. Code Ann. § 7-23-4103 - Municipal Dog License Tags(leg.mt.gov).gov
Share: