Montana
Montana Background Check Laws (2026 Guide)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 16, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 9, 2026. · 14 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Montana does not have a Ban the Box law, allowing employers to ask about criminal history at any stage of hiring. The federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), 15 U.S.C. 1681, applies to most employment background checks in the state, but Montana also has its own consumer reporting act, and on criminal records it is stricter than federal law: MCA 31-3-112(5) bars a consumer reporting agency from reporting a conviction more than seven years after the date of disposition, release, or parole.
Last verified: March 2026. This page reflects current Montana Code Annotated (MCA) Title 31, Chapter 3 (Consumer Reporting Agencies); Title 44, Chapter 5 (Criminal Justice Information); Title 39, Chapter 2 (Employment Relationship); Title 49, Chapter 2 (Human Rights); and applicable federal law.
Overview of Montana Background Check Laws
Montana takes a relatively employer-friendly approach to hiring inquiries compared to many other states. The state has no Ban the Box law restricting when employers can ask about criminal history. On what a screening company may lawfully report, however, Montana is stricter than federal law, capping criminal record reporting, convictions included, at seven years.
The federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) applies to all consumer reporting agencies operating in the state, and Montana's own Consumer Reporting Agencies act (MCA Title 31, chapter 3, part 1) layers state duties, state reporting limits, and state-law damages on top of it. The Montana Human Rights Act (MCA 49-2-303) prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, national origin, age, sex, marital status, or disability. And the state's criminal records dissemination statutes under MCA Title 44, Chapter 5 control what information can be released to the public.
Background checks in Montana may include criminal history, employment verification, education verification, credit reports, and driving records. The Montana Department of Justice oversees criminal background checks through its Criminal Records Section, offering both name-based and fingerprint-based searches.
Who Conducts Background Checks in Montana
The Montana Department of Justice (DOJ) serves as the central repository for criminal history records in the state. The DOJ operates the Criminal Records Information Sharing System (CRISS), which stores arrest, prosecution, and court disposition data from law enforcement agencies across Montana.

CHOPRS: The Public Records Search System
The Criminal History Online Public Record Search (CHOPRS) system allows members of the public to search Montana criminal records by name and date of birth. A Social Security number is optional but improves accuracy.
CHOPRS access is available at doj.egovmt.com/choprs. Registered users receive monthly billing options, while one-time users pay per search.
Fees for State Background Checks
The Montana DOJ charges the following fees for criminal background checks:
| Check Type | Fee |
|---|---|
| Online public name-based (CHOPRS) | $20 |
| Mail-in name-based | $15 per individual |
| Mail-in fingerprint-based | $10 per individual |
| In-person (Helena office) | Varies by type |
In-person services are available Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. at 2225 11th Avenue, Helena, MT 59601.
What State Criminal Records Include
Montana criminal background checks contain only criminal history information. They do not include consumer credit data, immigration records, or driving records (except felony-related arrests).
Access turns on whether a record is public or confidential criminal justice information. MCA 44-5-301 provides that there are no restrictions on the dissemination of public criminal justice information, and MCA 44-5-103(13) defines that category to include court records and proceedings, convictions, deferred sentences and deferred prosecutions, initial offense reports, initial arrest records and booking photographs, bail records, and daily jail rosters. Anything outside that definition is confidential criminal justice information, and MCA 44-5-302 restricts who may receive it, generally limiting dissemination to criminal justice agencies absent the subject's consent, a court order, or other statutory authorization.
A deferred sentence or deferred prosecution is therefore public while the case is pending. It becomes confidential only after the defendant successfully completes the deferral and the charge is dismissed under MCA 46-18-204, discussed below.
Employment Background Checks in Montana
No Ban the Box Law
Montana has not enacted a statewide Ban the Box or fair chance hiring law for either public or private employers. Employers may include questions about criminal history on job applications and inquire about convictions at any stage of the hiring process.
This stands in contrast to the growing number of states that have adopted fair chance hiring policies. As of 2026, fifteen states mandate the removal of conviction history questions from private-sector job applications, including California, Colorado, Connecticut, Illinois, and New Jersey. Montana is not among them.
No Montana city or county has adopted a local Ban the Box ordinance for private employers either. However, some public employers in Montana voluntarily delay criminal history inquiries until later in the hiring process.
FCRA Requirements for Employers
Any Montana employer that uses a third-party consumer reporting agency (CRA) to conduct background checks must comply with the FCRA (15 U.S.C. 1681). Key requirements include:
Before the check:
- Provide a clear, standalone written disclosure to the applicant that a background check will be conducted
- Obtain the applicant's written authorization before requesting the report
If taking adverse action (not hiring based on the report):
- Provide the applicant with a pre-adverse action notice, a copy of the report, and a summary of their FCRA rights
- Wait a reasonable period (typically five business days) before making a final decision
- Send a final adverse action notice explaining the decision, identifying the CRA, and informing the applicant of their right to dispute
Montana adds a state adverse-action duty of its own under MCA 31-3-131(1), covered in the state consumer reporting section below.
Employer Fee Prohibition
Under MCA 39-2-301, it is unlawful for a Montana employer to require an employee or applicant for employment to pay the cost of a medical examination, or the cost of furnishing any records of that examination, as a condition of employment. A violation is a misdemeanor carrying a fine of up to $100 for each offense.
That statute is limited to medical examinations and the records of those examinations. It does not address background check fees, so MCA 39-2-301 is not authority for the proposition that a Montana employer must absorb the cost of a criminal history check.
Montana Human Rights Act Protections
The Montana Human Rights Act (MCA 49-2-303) prohibits employment discrimination based on race, creed, religion, color, national origin, age, physical or mental disability, marital status, or sex. While criminal history is not a protected class under this law, employers who use criminal records in ways that disproportionately screen out members of a protected class may face disparate impact claims.
The EEOC's enforcement guidance recommends that employers consider three factors when evaluating criminal history: the nature and gravity of the offense, the time elapsed since the conviction or completion of the sentence, and the nature of the job in question.
Lookback Periods and Reporting Limits
Seven-Year Rule for Non-Convictions
Under the federal FCRA, consumer reporting agencies generally cannot report non-conviction information (arrests not leading to conviction, civil suits, civil judgments, paid tax liens, and collection accounts) that is more than seven years old. This rule applies to all background checks conducted through third-party CRAs in Montana.
Montana imposes a parallel set of limits in its own statute. MCA 31-3-112, titled Obsolete information, bars a consumer reporting agency from making any consumer report containing bankruptcies more than 14 years old, suits and judgments more than seven years old or until the governing statute of limitations has expired (whichever is longer), paid tax liens more than seven years from payment, collection accounts more than seven years old, criminal records as described below, and any other adverse item of information more than seven years old.
Montana Caps Conviction Reporting at Seven Years
This is where Montana departs from federal law, and it is the point most often reported incorrectly. The FCRA lets a consumer reporting agency report criminal convictions with no time limit. Montana does not.
MCA 31-3-112(5) provides that a consumer reporting agency may not make any consumer report containing records of arrest, indictment, or conviction of crime which, from date of disposition, release, or parole, antedate the report by more than 7 years.
Convictions are named in that subsection alongside arrests and indictments, so a Montana consumer report should not carry a conviction more than seven years after the date of disposition, release, or parole. The provision was enacted in 1975, and the FCRA's preemption clause at 15 U.S.C. 1681t(b)(1)(E) preserves state obsolete-information laws that were in effect on September 30, 1996.
Two limits on the rule are worth stating plainly. It binds consumer reporting agencies, not an employer who learns of a conviction some other way. And it does not erase anything: the conviction still exists in state court files and can still surface in a CHOPRS search unless it has been expunged or sealed.
The Federal Salary Exception Does Not Change the Montana Limit
Under the FCRA, 15 U.S.C. 1681c(b)(3), the seven-year limits on non-conviction information do not apply to a report used in connection with employment at an annual salary that equals or is reasonably expected to equal $75,000 or more.
That exception is federal. MCA 31-3-112 contains no salary threshold and no exception of any kind. For a consumer report furnished in Montana, the state seven-year bar, including the bar on convictions in subsection (5), applies regardless of what the position pays.
Summary of Montana Reporting Limits
| Record Type | Lookback Period |
|---|---|
| Criminal convictions | 7 years from date of disposition, release, or parole (MCA 31-3-112(5)) |
| Non-conviction records (arrests, indictments, dismissals) | 7 years (FCRA; MCA 31-3-112(5)) |
| Bankruptcies | 10 years (FCRA); Montana's own limit is 14 years (MCA 31-3-112(1)) |
| Civil suits and judgments | 7 years, or until the statute of limitations expires, whichever is longer (FCRA; MCA 31-3-112(2)) |
| Paid tax liens | 7 years (FCRA; MCA 31-3-112(3)) |
| Collection accounts | 7 years (FCRA; MCA 31-3-112(4)) |
Where the federal and state periods differ, the stricter one is the practical ceiling for a report furnished in Montana. The federal $75,000 salary exception has no counterpart in the Montana statute.
FCRA Interaction with Montana Law
The FCRA establishes a federal floor for background check protections across all states. Montana has built on that floor rather than relying on it. MCA Title 31, chapter 3, part 1, the state's Consumer Reporting Agencies act, imposes a parallel set of duties on screening companies and on the employers who use their reports, and on criminal records it is stricter than federal law.
Montana's Own Consumer Reporting Duties
These state provisions apply in addition to the FCRA:
Permissible purposes (31-3-111): limits the circumstances in which a consumer report may be furnished.
Obsolete information (31-3-112): sets the reporting limits described above, including the seven-year cap on convictions.
Investigative consumer reports (31-3-113): requires disclosure to the consumer when an investigative consumer report is requested.
Compliance procedures (31-3-114): requires reasonable procedures for accuracy and for confirming permissible purpose.
Public record information for employment purposes (31-3-126): an agency that reports public record items likely to have an adverse effect on a consumer's ability to obtain employment must either notify the consumer that the information is being reported or maintain strict procedures to keep that information complete and up to date.
Requirements on users (31-3-131(1)): whenever employment, credit, or insurance is denied, wholly or partly because of information in a consumer report, the user must advise the consumer and supply the name and address of the consumer reporting agency that made the report. This state adverse-action duty sits alongside the federal pre-adverse and final adverse action notices, and a Montana employer that satisfies only the federal steps has not necessarily satisfied it.
Consumer disclosure and disputes (31-3-122, 31-3-123, 31-3-124): give consumers access to their file and a procedure for disputed accuracy.
Private actions and liability (31-3-141, 31-3-142, 31-3-143): allow a consumer to bring an action, with civil liability for willful noncompliance and for negligent noncompliance. This is a state-law damages exposure independent of the FCRA.
Key FCRA Protections in Montana
Accuracy requirements: CRAs must follow reasonable procedures to ensure the maximum possible accuracy of consumer reports under 15 U.S.C. 1681e(b).
Dispute rights: Consumers may dispute inaccurate information in their reports. The CRA must investigate within 30 days and correct or delete information that cannot be verified.
Permissible purpose: A background check can only be run with a permissible purpose, such as employment (with the applicant's consent), tenant screening, credit decisions, or licensing.
File disclosure: Consumers have the right to request a copy of their own consumer file from any CRA. If a consumer has been denied employment based on a background check, the CRA must provide a free copy of the report upon request.
Montana Consumer Data Privacy Act
In 2023, Montana enacted the Montana Consumer Data Privacy Act (SB 384), which took effect on October 1, 2024. This law gives Montana residents rights over their personal data, including the right to access, correct, delete, and opt out of the sale of personal data.
While the law primarily targets data brokers and large data processors, it adds an additional layer of privacy protection that may affect how background check data is collected and stored. Background screening companies operating in Montana should ensure compliance with the FCRA, the state consumer reporting act, and the Montana Consumer Data Privacy Act.
Housing and Tenant Background Checks
Montana does not have a state law prohibiting landlords from considering criminal history during tenant screening. Landlords may conduct background checks as part of the rental application process, provided they obtain written consent from the applicant.
What Landlords Can Screen
Montana landlords may legally screen for:
- Criminal history (felonies and misdemeanors)
- Prior evictions
- Credit history
- Employment and income verification
- Rental references
A tenant screening report is still a consumer report, so the MCA 31-3-112 reporting limits described above apply to what a screening company may include in it.
Restrictions on Tenant Screening
While Montana law gives landlords broad discretion, several important restrictions apply:
Federal Fair Housing Act: Landlords cannot use criminal history screening as a pretext for discrimination based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, familial status, or disability. HUD guidance from 2016 established that blanket bans on renting to anyone with a criminal record may violate the Fair Housing Act if they have a disparate impact on protected classes.
Bankruptcy protection: Montana landlords cannot deny a rental application solely because the applicant has a bankruptcy on record.
Public assistance: Landlords cannot refuse to rent to someone solely because they receive public assistance.
Application fees: Montana does not cap the amount landlords can charge for application or screening fees, but the fees should be reasonable and reflect actual costs.
Professional Licensing Background Checks
Montana requires background checks for several licensed professions, particularly those involving vulnerable populations.
Healthcare Workers
Under MCA 37-8-434, the Montana Board of Nursing requires all applicants for nursing licensure to submit fingerprints for state and federal criminal history background checks. The applicant bears the cost of the fingerprint-based check. The board reviews results to determine whether any criminal history disqualifies the applicant from licensure.
Nursing homes in Montana must also request criminal history background checks on every applicant for employment as a nursing home worker or administrator. A conviction related to public health, safety, or welfare is sufficient grounds to deny employment.
Childcare Workers
The Montana Department of Public Health and Human Services (DPHHS) requires criminal background checks and Child Protective Service (CPS) checks for individuals working with children in licensed settings. According to DPHHS, the categories screened include:
- Child placing agency staff and volunteers
- Foster care, adoption, and guardianship providers (including household members)
- Day care center staff and family/group child care home providers
- Youth care facility personnel
The statute usually cited in this context is MCA 41-3-205, but it is worth being precise about what it does. That section is a confidentiality statute for child abuse and neglect case records. Its subsection (3)(o) permits disclosure of records to a person or entity carrying out background, employment-related, or volunteer-related screening of current or prospective employees or volunteers who have or may have unsupervised contact with children, on written request, and limited to investigations in which the allegation against that person was substantiated. It authorizes the CPS check to return information; the requirement that a given provider be screened comes from DPHHS licensing rules and the program statutes for that provider type, not from MCA 41-3-205 itself.
CPS background checks are provided at no cost. The process requires a completed, signed, and notarized Montana Release of Information form. Applicants should allow at least ten working days for processing.
School Employees and Volunteers
In 2025, the Montana legislature passed House Bill 745, which requires fingerprint-based background checks for all school employees and unsupervised volunteers. The bill replaced the previous system where some schools accepted name-based checks, standardizing the requirement across all public schools in the state. This law ensures that anyone with unsupervised access to students undergoes a thorough criminal records review.
Other Licensed Professions
Montana requires background checks for additional licensed professions, including:
- Teachers and school administrators (under Mont. Admin. R. 10.57.201A)
- Social workers applying for clinical licensure
- Law enforcement officers
- Attorneys (through the Montana Supreme Court's Commission on Character and Fitness)
- Banking and financial services professionals
Firearms Background Checks
Montana follows federal law for firearms background checks through licensed dealers. The state is not a point of contact for the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS), meaning all dealer transfers are processed directly through the FBI.
Montana does not require background checks for private firearms sales or transfers between individuals. There is no state waiting period, no firearms registration requirement, and no permit required to purchase firearms or ammunition.
Montana concealed weapons permit holders are exempt from the NICS background check when purchasing from a licensed dealer, as Montana is a permanent Brady Check exemption state.
The City of Missoula has adopted a local ordinance requiring background checks for private firearm sales and transfers, making it the only jurisdiction in Montana with such a requirement.
Criminal Record Expungement and Sealing in Montana
Montana offers limited options for clearing criminal records, which directly affects what appears on background checks.
Misdemeanor Expungement
Under Montana law, anyone convicted of one or more misdemeanors may petition the court for expungement. The petitioner must meet these requirements:
- At least five years have passed since the most recent misdemeanor conviction
- All fines, fees, and jail time have been completed
- There is a presumption in favor of granting the expungement after five years
The Montana Supreme Court publishes expungement forms and instructions for self-represented individuals.
Felony Expungement (Limited)
Montana does not allow expungement of standard felony convictions. In the 2025 legislative session, HB 795 proposed expanding expungement eligibility to non-violent felonies, but the bill failed in the House.
The one exception involves marijuana-related felonies. Individuals convicted of activities that are now legal under Montana law (following legalization) may petition to have those records expunged.
The Montana legislature authorized a study through HJ 45 to examine the collateral consequences of criminal convictions and criminal record expungement. Results are expected to be reported to the legislature in 2027, which may lead to future reforms.
Non-Conviction Record Removal
The Montana Department of Justice handles removal of non-conviction records from the state database. Records that qualify for removal include cases that were dismissed, resulted in acquittal, were dropped, or were never filed.
MCA 44-5-202(8) requires that when a person is released without charges being filed, when the charges do not result in a conviction, or when a conviction is later invalidated, the court report the disposition to the state repository within 14 business days, and that the individual's photographs and fingerprints be returned to the originating agency and expunged. That provision reaches photographs and fingerprints. It does not by itself pull the underlying non-conviction arrest entry out of the criminal history record, which is why the removal request still has to be made: individuals who find non-conviction records still showing in the system should submit a Non-Conviction Removal Form to Montana Criminal Records.
Deferred Sentence Sealing
Under MCA 46-18-204, when a defendant successfully completes a deferred sentence, the court may dismiss the charge. After dismissal, all records related to that charge become confidential criminal justice information. The public may only access these sealed records through a district court order upon a showing of good cause.
Until that dismissal happens, the deferred sentence or deferred prosecution is public criminal justice information under MCA 44-5-103(13)(c) and can be disseminated without restriction. The confidentiality is earned by completing the deferral, not by entering into it.
This distinction matters for background checks: sealed records will not appear in public CHOPRS searches, but certain criminal justice agencies listed under MCA 44-5-103 retain full access.
Montana Wrongful Discharge Act and Background Checks
Montana is the only state in the nation with a Wrongful Discharge from Employment Act (WDEA), codified at MCA 39-2-901 through 39-2-915. This law requires employers to have "good cause" for terminating an employee who has completed the probationary period.
While the WDEA does not specifically address background checks, it creates an environment where employers should apply criminal history policies consistently. Terminating an employee based on a background check finding that was known at the time of hire, or that is unrelated to job duties, could potentially support a wrongful discharge claim.
The WDEA also protects employees who report violations of public policy. An employee terminated in retaliation for raising concerns about unlawful background check practices may have a claim under this statute.
Recent Changes and Developments
HB 745: School Background Checks (2025)
The most significant recent change to Montana background check law came through House Bill 745, which requires fingerprint-based background checks for all public school employees and unsupervised volunteers. The bill passed the Montana House 97-1 and was signed into law.
SB 362: Firefighter Hiring (2025)
Senate Bill 362 authorized fire chiefs to offer employment to applicants with misdemeanor or felony convictions, provided the conviction does not require registration on the sexual or violent offender registry. This represents a limited fair chance hiring measure for a specific profession.
HJ 45: Expungement Study (2025)
The legislature authorized an interim study on the collateral consequences of criminal convictions and criminal record expungement. The study results, expected in 2027, could inform future legislation expanding expungement options in Montana.
Montana Consumer Data Privacy Act (2024)
The Montana Consumer Data Privacy Act took effect on October 1, 2024, giving residents new rights over their personal data. While primarily aimed at data brokers and large companies, the law may affect how background check data is collected, stored, and shared.
Related Reading
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Montana have a Ban the Box law?
No. Montana has not enacted a Ban the Box or fair chance hiring law for either public or private employers. Employers may ask about criminal history on job applications and at any stage of the hiring process. No Montana city or county has adopted a local Ban the Box ordinance for private employers either.
How far back do background checks go in Montana?
Seven years for criminal records. Montana's own consumer reporting act, MCA 31-3-112(5), bars a consumer reporting agency from making a report containing records of arrest, indictment, or conviction of crime more than seven years after the date of disposition, release, or parole. That is stricter than the FCRA, which places no time limit on reporting convictions. The federal $75,000 salary exception has no counterpart in the Montana statute, so the state seven-year limit applies regardless of what the position pays. The limit binds screening companies; it does not erase the record from state court files or from a CHOPRS search.
Can a Montana employer deny a job based on a criminal record?
Yes, but with important limitations. Montana employers may consider criminal history in hiring decisions. However, under EEOC guidance and the Montana Human Rights Act, employers should evaluate the nature of the offense, the time elapsed since the conviction, and the relevance of the conviction to the job. Blanket policies that reject all applicants with criminal records may create disparate impact liability. If employment is denied wholly or partly because of a consumer report, MCA 31-3-131(1) also requires the employer to advise the applicant and supply the name and address of the reporting agency, in addition to the federal adverse action notices.
Can I get my criminal record expunged in Montana?
Montana allows expungement of misdemeanor convictions after a five-year waiting period, provided all fines and sentences have been completed. Felony expungement is generally not available, except for marijuana-related offenses involving activities that are now legal. Non-conviction records (dismissals, acquittals) can be removed from the state database, and deferred sentences that result in dismissal are sealed from public access under MCA 46-18-204.
Can a Montana landlord run a background check on a tenant?
Yes. Montana landlords may conduct background checks on prospective tenants with the applicant's written consent. There is no state law prohibiting landlords from considering criminal history. However, landlords must comply with the federal Fair Housing Act and cannot use criminal history screening in a discriminatory manner. Montana also prohibits denying tenancy based solely on bankruptcy history or receipt of public assistance.
Updates
Corrected the reporting-limit sections: Montana's own consumer reporting act (MCA 31-3-112(5)) caps criminal record reporting, convictions included, at seven years, and the federal $75,000 salary exception does not apply to it; also corrected the statutes cited for public record access, childcare screening, non-conviction record removal, and the employer fee prohibition.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Montana Code Annotated, Title 31
§ 31-3-112Obsolete InformationIn force
31-3-112. Obsolete information. No consumer reporting agency may make any consumer report containing any of the following items of information: (1) bankruptcies which, from date of adjudication of the most recent bankruptcy, antedate the report by more than 14 years; (2) suits and judgments which, from date of entry, antedate the report by more than 7 years or until the governing statute of limitations has expired, whichever is the longer period; (3) paid tax liens which, from date of payment, antedate the report by more than 7 years; (4) accounts placed for collection or charged to profit and loss which antedate the report by more than 7 years; (5) records of arrest, indictment, or conviction of crime which, from date of disposition, release, or parole, antedate the report by more than 7 years; (6) any other adverse item of information which antedates the report by more than 7 years.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at mca.legmt.gov
United States Code Title 15
§ 1681Congressional findings and statement of purposeIn forcecited in 14 of our articles
The Congress makes the following findings: The banking system is dependent upon fair and accurate credit reporting. Inaccurate credit reports directly impair the efficiency of the banking system, and unfair credit reporting methods undermine the public confidence which is essential to the continued functioning of the banking system. An elaborate mechanism has been developed for investigating and evaluating the credit worthiness, credit standing, credit capacity, character, and general reputation of consumers. Consumer reporting agencies have assumed a vital role in assembling and evaluating consumer credit and other information on consumers. There is a need to insure that consumer reporting agencies exercise their grave responsibilities with fairness, impartiality, and a respect for the consumer’s right to privacy.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 3,711 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Courts cite 1681(a)'s findings for the Act's purpose and decide under its operative sections. Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins (2016) held that a bare procedural FCRA violation divorced from concrete harm does not satisfy Article III, and TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez (2021) applied that rule to hold 6,332 class members lacked standing.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins (Supreme Court of the United States 2016, 578 U.S. 330)✓Robins alleged Spokeo's people-search profile carried false information about him and sued under the FCRA, 15 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq.; the Court held a bare procedural violation divorced from concrete harm does not satisfy Article III injury in fact, and remanded.
- TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez (Supreme Court of the United States 2021, 594 U.S. 413)✓TransUnion flagged 8,185 consumers as potential matches to a Treasury terrorist list; suing under the FCRA, only the 1,853 whose misleading reports actually reached third parties were held concretely harmed, so the other 6,332 lacked Article III standing for damages.
- Pintos v. PACIFIC CREDITORS ASS'N (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2010, 605 F.3d 665)✓Police had Pintos's car towed and the towing company transferred its deficiency claim to a collection agency, which pulled her Experian report; the Ninth Circuit held § 1681b(a)(3)(A) gave no permissible purpose, since neither credit she sought nor a judgment debt was involved.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Background Check Laws by State (2026 Guide), Employee Data Privacy: Employer Obligations by State (2026), How to Opt Out of Data Brokers (2026)
§ 1681eCompliance proceduresIn forcecited in 4 of our articles
Every consumer reporting agency shall maintain reasonable procedures designed to avoid violations of section 1681c of this title and to limit the furnishing of consumer reports to the purposes listed under section 1681b of this title. These procedures shall require that prospective users of the information identify themselves, certify the purposes for which the information is sought, and certify that the information will be used for no other purpose. Every consumer reporting agency shall make a reasonable effort to verify the identity of a new prospective user and the uses certified by such prospective user prior to furnishing such user a consumer report. No consumer reporting agency may furnish a consumer report to any person if it has reasonable grounds for believing that the consumer report will not be used for a purpose listed in section 1681b of this title. Whenever a consumer reporting agency prepares a consumer report it shall follow reasonable procedures to assure maximum possible accuracy of the information concerning the individual about whom the report relates.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 1,128 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez (Supreme Court of the United States 2021, 594 U.S. 413)“…of the plaintiffs’ credit files maintained by TransUnion. 15 U. S. C. §1681e(b). In particular, the plaintiffs argue…”
- Pintos v. PACIFIC CREDITORS ASS'N (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2010, 605 F.3d 665)“…a violation because it had fulfilled its obligations under 15 U.S.C. § 1681e, which immunizes a reporting agency aga…”
- Sandra Cortez v. Trans Union (Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2010, 617 F.3d 688)“…appeal.21 A. Reasonable Procedures for Maximum Accuracy, 15 U.S.C. § 1681e(b) 15 U.S.C. § 1681e(b) provide…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: FTC Settles with Tenant-Screening Company RentGrow Over Alleged FCRA Accuracy Violations, How to Check if Your Record Has Been Expunged, 15 U.S.C. § 1681 (FCRA): Credit Report Rights Explained
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Montana Department of Justice - Background Checks(dojmt.gov).gov
- Montana DOJ - Non-Conviction Removal and Sealing(dojmt.gov).gov
- Montana Code Annotated 49-2-303 - Discrimination in Employment(archive.legmt.gov).gov
- Montana Code Annotated 44-5-302 - Dissemination of Criminal History Record Information(archive.legmt.gov).gov
- Montana Code Annotated 46-18-204 - Dismissal After Deferred Imposition(archive.legmt.gov).gov
- Montana Code Annotated 39-2-301 - Employer Fee Prohibition(archive.legmt.gov).gov
- Montana DPHHS - Child Protective Service Background Checks(dphhs.mt.gov).gov
- Montana Code Annotated 37-8-434 - Criminal Background Check (Nursing)(law.justia.com)
- EEOC Enforcement Guidance on Arrest and Conviction Records(eeoc.gov).gov
- FTC - Fair Credit Reporting Act(ftc.gov).gov
- FBI - National Instant Criminal Background Check System(fbi.gov).gov
- Montana HB 745 - School Employee Background Checks(projects.montanafreepress.org)
- Montana Supreme Court - Misdemeanor Expungement Forms(courts.mt.gov).gov
- Montana Consumer Data Privacy Act(dojmt.gov).gov
- City of Missoula - Firearms Background Checks Ordinance(ci.missoula.mt.us).gov
- NELP - Ban the Box Fair Chance Hiring Guide(nelp.org)
- Montana WDEA - MCA 39-2-904(archive.legmt.gov).gov
- HJ 45 - Interim Study on Criminal Record Expungement(rstreet.org)
- Montana Code Annotated 31-3-112 - Obsolete Information (seven-year limit on arrest, indictment, and conviction reporting)(mca.legmt.gov)
- Montana Code Annotated Title 31, Chapter 3, Part 1 - Consumer Reporting Agencies(mca.legmt.gov)
- Montana Code Annotated 31-3-131 - Requirements on Users of Consumer Reports(mca.legmt.gov)
- Montana Code Annotated 31-3-126 - Public Record Information for Employment Purposes(mca.legmt.gov)
- Montana Code Annotated 44-5-301 - Dissemination of Public Criminal Justice Information(mca.legmt.gov)
- Montana Code Annotated 44-5-103 - Definitions (public criminal justice information)(mca.legmt.gov)
- Montana Code Annotated 44-5-202 - Photographs and Fingerprints(mca.legmt.gov)
- Montana Code Annotated 41-3-205 - Confidentiality and Disclosure Exceptions(mca.legmt.gov)
- Montana Code Annotated 39-2-301 - Employer May Not Require Payment for Medical Examination(mca.legmt.gov)