EnglishEspañol
Wyoming flag

Wyoming

Wyoming Laws on Recording Police: Your Rights and Limits

Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 15, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 15, 2026. · 6 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Wyoming Laws on Recording Police: Your Rights and Limits

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I record police officers in Wyoming?

Yes. You have a First Amendment right to record police performing their duties in public. The Tenth Circuit, which covers Wyoming, has affirmed this right. Wyoming's one-party consent law also allows you to record any interaction with police that you participate in. You must not interfere with operations while recording.

Can a police officer tell me to stop recording in Wyoming?

An officer cannot lawfully order you to stop recording in a public place if you are not interfering with their duties. If told to stop, calmly assert your right. Comply with legitimate safety orders to move back and continue recording from a greater distance.

Can police confiscate my phone or camera in Wyoming?

Officers can seize your phone or camera without a warrant in some situations, such as incident to a lawful arrest. But under Riley v. California (2014), they generally need a warrant to search its contents, including photos and videos, even after a lawful seizure. Officers cannot delete recordings or force you to delete them.

Do Wyoming police officers have to wear body cameras?

Wyoming does not have a statewide body camera mandate. Individual law enforcement agencies adopt body camera programs based on their own policies and resources. Whether officers at a specific agency use body cameras depends on that department.

What should I do if a Wyoming police officer violates my right to record?

Stay calm, assert your rights, comply under protest, and document everything. You may file an internal affairs complaint, a public records request for body camera footage, or a federal civil rights lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983. Consult a civil rights attorney.

Updates

Corrected the page's description of Riley v. California: police generally need a warrant to search a seized device's contents, but seizing the device itself (for example incident to a lawful arrest) does not require a warrant. Also replaced a dead Riley v. California citation link with a live source.

Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes

Governing law re-checked for recent changes

Governing law re-checked for recent changes

Reviewed and approved by an editor

Sources and References

  1. Wyo. Stat. Ann. Section 7-3-702 - Interception of Communications(law.justia.com)
  2. Wyo. Stat. Ann. Section 6-5-204 - Interference with Peace Officer(wyoleg.gov).gov
  3. Wyoming Public Records Act Section 16-4-203(d)(xviii) (body-camera exception)(wyoleg.gov).gov
  4. Irizarry v. Yehia, 38 F.4th 1282 (10th Cir. 2022)(cases.justia.com)
  5. Frasier v. Evans, 992 F.3d 1003 (10th Cir. 2021)(courtlistener.com).gov
  6. Riley v. California, 573 U.S. 373 (2014)(supremecourt.gov).gov
  7. DOJ - Addressing Police Misconduct(justice.gov).gov
  8. BLM Wyoming(blm.gov).gov
Share: