Nursing Home Camera Laws by State (2026): Granny Cam Rights
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 16, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 16, 2026. · 12 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content
At least 18 states give a nursing home or long-term care resident a legal right to install a camera in their own room, sometimes called a "granny cam" law. In roughly 32 states, no such statute exists, and a facility's own policy controls. Two states often listed as granny-cam states, New Jersey and Arizona, are not among the 18.
Information last verified on 2026-08-13. This article has not yet been reviewed by a licensed lawyer.
This page covers the 18 states with an enacted electronic-monitoring law for nursing home or long-term care residents, the states most often mistaken for having one, the practical reality in a state with no statute, and the evidence value of camera footage in an abuse or neglect claim. It does not cover recording a caregiver in a private home; see Nanny Cam Laws for that.
Which States Have a Nursing Home Camera Law?
Eighteen states have passed a law or adopted an agency regulation specifically addressing a resident's right to operate an electronic monitoring device in their own room. Every one of these laws shares a similar structure: a resident or representative requests or authorizes the device, a roommate in a shared room generally has to consent separately, and the facility has to post some form of notice. The details, and how strictly each state enforces them, vary considerably.
| State | Statute | Who May Request Monitoring | Roommate Consent | Notice |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Connecticut | Conn. Gen. Stat. § 19a-550b (Public Act 21-55, 2021; extended to residential care homes by 2026 HB 5142, eff. Oct. 1, 2026) | Resident, using technology of their own choosing | Written consent required, at least 7 days before installation under the 2026 amendment | Consent forms developed by the state's Long-Term Care Ombudsman program |
| Illinois | 210 ILCS 32 (Authorized Electronic Monitoring in Long-Term Care Facilities Act) | Resident | Required | Facility must post notice; a separate notice to visitors is also required |
| Kansas | K.S.A. § 39-981 | Resident, by notifying the adult care home | Required, on a secretary-prescribed form, for shared rooms | Conspicuous notice required at both the facility entrance and the resident's own room door |
| Louisiana | La. R.S. §§ 40:1193.1-1193.11 | Resident or roommate, at any time during residency | Required; if a roommate refuses, the facility must offer to move either resident to another shared room | Facility must notify the resident of the right at admission and keep a record of the resident's choice; signs required at the facility's main entrance and at the entrance to the monitored room (§ 40:1193.9) |
| Minnesota | Minn. Stat. § 144.6502 | Resident, or a representative in priority order (guardian, then health care agent, then a person the resident designated in writing) | Required in writing; a roommate may withdraw consent at any time | Facility must post notice at every entrance |
| Missouri | RSMo §§ 198.610-198.632 | Resident, guardian, or legal representative | Each roommate signs a consent form before installation | State consent-form process |
| Nevada | NRS §§ 449A.182, 449A.184, 449A.190 ("Henry's Law") | Patient in a covered facility, or the patient's representative | Written consent required, plus the roommate's own privacy waiver and liability release; if a roommate refuses, the facility must make reasonable attempts to accommodate, which may include moving either resident with that person's consent; either may revoke in writing, and the device must be removed within 24 hours | Facility must post a conspicuous notice at the entrance to the living quarters where a device is in use |
| New Mexico | NMSA 1978, ch. 24, art. 26 (Patient Care Monitoring Act) | Patient or legal surrogate | Required, with an accommodation procedure if a roommate refuses | Facility must be given notice of installation |
| North Dakota | N.D. Cent. Code § 50-10.2-02.1 | Resident or resident representative, on written notice of the placement and use to the facility | Signed HIPAA-compliant authorization required from each resident sharing the room, withdrawable in writing; facility must make a reasonable attempt to accommodate if a roommate refuses | Facility must clearly and conspicuously post a sign where authorized electronic recording is being conducted |
| Ohio | Ohio Rev. Code §§ 3721.60-3721.65 ("Esther's Law") | Resident or representative, on a facility-prescribed authorization form | Required | Posted notice required |
| Oklahoma | 63 O.S. §§ 1-1956.1 to 1-1956.7 (renumbered from §§ 1-1953.1 to 1-1953.7 by Laws 2020, c. 39) | Resident or representative, on a state-prescribed consent form | Required on the same form; a roommate may condition consent on the camera pointing away from them | State-prescribed notice process |
| Rhode Island | R.I. Gen. Laws § 23-17.29 | Resident, on a RIDOH-prescribed consent form | Required | State-prescribed notice process |
| South Dakota | S.D. Codified Laws tit. 34, ch. 12I | Resident, through a consent-form process | Dedicated roommate-consent and refusal/relocation provisions | Dedicated notice-requirements section |
| Texas | Tex. Health & Safety Code ch. 242, subch. R | Resident or guardian/legal representative | Required, through the state's consent-form process | Facility must post notice |
| Utah | Utah Code § 26B-2-236 (assisted living facilities and secure memory care units only, see below) | Resident or legal representative | Required in writing, specifying the hours each roommate consents to monitoring | Signage is optional for the facility, not mandatory |
| Virginia | Va. Code § 32.1-138.5:1 (Acts 2025, c. 432) | Resident or legal representative | Written consent required from all roommates; audio barred once a roommate is present | Posted notice required at the resident's room entrance; facility must also notify staff |
| Washington | WAC 388-97-0400 (Dept. of Social and Health Services regulation) | Resident, only after identifying a specific threat to health, safety, or property | Mandatory written consent; monitoring must stop immediately on objection | Facility must reevaluate the need in writing every quarter |
| Wyoming | Wyo. Stat. §§ 35-2-1301 to 35-2-1308 (Long-term Care Electronic Monitoring Act) | Resident, or a representative if the resident lacks capacity | Required from any roommate; if a roommate refuses, the resident's only recourse is a room or roommate switch at the resident's own expense | Conspicuous signage required at both the facility's main entrance and the resident's room door |
Washington's rule comes from a state agency regulation, not a bill passed by the legislature. It functions similarly to the other 17 states for a resident deciding whether to request a camera, but describing it as "the state legislature passed a granny-cam law" would be inaccurate.
The table summarizes what each statute itself requires. The forms, timelines, and internal procedures a facility uses to carry those requirements out still vary, so ask the facility or the state's long-term care ombudsman for the current paperwork before installing anything.
Oregon is not on this list, but it recently adopted a narrower, temporary rule worth flagging. OAR 411-054-0025(10) is a temporary administrative rule, effective August 10, 2026 through February 5, 2027, that requires an Electronic Monitoring Consent Model Form whenever a resident or representative chooses to have a camera or electronic monitoring device in the resident's room. It applies only inside an assisted living or residential care facility; skilled nursing facilities remain without a specific rule. Because the rule is temporary and scoped to assisted living rather than nursing homes, Oregon is not counted among the 18 states above, and the rule expires unless a permanent version replaces it before February 2027.
New Jersey and Arizona: Why They Are Not on This List
New Jersey and Arizona show up repeatedly in casual "states with granny cam laws" lists. Neither belongs there as of August 2026.
New Jersey has no enacted electronic-monitoring statute. What it has is the Division of Consumer Affairs' Safe Care Cam program, running since December 2016, which loans micro-surveillance cameras for 30 days (extendable) to a family that suspects abuse or neglect, originally for private in-home care and later expanded to nursing homes and other institutional settings. That is an administrative loan program, not a legal right to install a camera, and it does not create consent, notice, or roommate-consent rules the way the 18 states above do. Several bills that would have created a statutory right, most recently A805 (introduced January 2026), have not passed.
Arizona has no statute giving a resident or family the right to install a camera either. A bill that would have created that right, HB 2914, died in committee in the 2026 session; SB 1041 also failed. The bill that did pass, SB 1564, signed by Governor Hobbs in June 2026, only requires assisted living and skilled nursing facilities to disclose to the Arizona Department of Health Services whether they allow residents or families to install monitoring devices with consent. It does not create a right to do so; each facility still sets its own policy.
Three other states worth a caution rather than a table entry: Michigan has no enacted statute despite repeated attempts. A bill authorizing resident cameras has been introduced in four straight legislative sessions; the furthest any version got was Senate Bill 77, which passed both chambers in 2020 and was then pocket-vetoed by Governor Whitmer in January 2021. The current version, Senate Bill 412, was introduced in June 2025 and remains in committee with no further action. Maryland has only 2003 Department of Health guidance directing non-binding electronic-monitoring guidelines, not a statutory resident right, and a separate pending bill package would mandate common-area surveillance for abuse detection, a different concept from an individual in-room camera right. Wisconsin has agency guidance and a temporary camera-loan program for suspected abuse, not a standing statutory right. North Carolina has only an introduced 2025 bill (H591).
Three Laws Worth a Closer Look
New Mexico's felony penalty. Under the Patient Care Monitoring Act, intentionally tampering with, obstructing, or destroying a monitoring device or its recordings is a fourth-degree felony. Every other state in this group treats interference as a civil, licensing, or administrative matter; New Mexico is the only one that reaches for a felony criminal charge.
Nevada's waiver-and-release model. Henry's Law keeps the consent-and-notice structure the other states use and then spells out an allocation of legal risk on top of it. A request under NRS § 449A.182 must include the patient's or representative's agreement to waive the patient's right to privacy in connection with the device and to release the facility and its employees from administrative, civil, or criminal liability for a violation of that right. A roommate who consents signs the same waiver and release. Nevada is not alone in tying a release to consent: La. R.S. § 40:1193.5(B) and NMSA 1978, § 24-26-5(B) both provide that consent to a monitoring device includes a release of liability for a violation of the resident's right to privacy.
Utah's scope limit. Utah Code § 26B-2-236 applies only to an assisted living facility or a secure memory care unit inside a nursing care facility, not a general nursing-facility room. A family whose relative is in a standard nursing facility room in Utah, outside memory care, is not covered by this statute at all.
Enforcement: What Happens If a Facility Interferes With a Camera
Most of the 18 states enforce interference through a civil or licensing path rather than a criminal one. Minnesota's health commissioner can issue correction orders and impose fines up to $500 per violation for noncompliance with the law's notice, filing, accommodation, or signage requirements. Illinois's Authorized Electronic Monitoring in Long-Term Care Facilities Act includes a dedicated section addressing obstruction of monitoring devices and makes recordings admissible in abuse and neglect proceedings. South Dakota's chapter likewise includes a dedicated device-destruction section and an anti-retaliation prohibition.
New Mexico is the outlier described above: a fourth-degree felony for intentional tampering, obstruction, or destruction, the only criminal-felony penalty specifically for camera interference found among these 18 states. North Dakota also criminalizes interference, but as a class B misdemeanor rather than a felony. In Washington, because the rule is an agency regulation rather than a statute, a facility that interferes routes through the state's licensing process and the Long-Term Care Ombudsman complaint channel rather than through a court. Virginia's statute requires the facility to adopt a policy prohibiting staff from tampering with monitoring devices, but the statute itself sets no criminal penalty; interference there is addressed through facility policy rather than a specific civil or criminal enforcement provision. Wyoming's statute likewise has no dedicated tampering penalty, only a general compliance clause.
If Your State Has No Camera Law
For the roughly 32 states without a specific statute, no federal law fills the gap either way. Federal nursing home regulations under 42 CFR Part 483 govern facility conduct, such as staffing levels and care planning, not a family's own recording equipment. In a no-statute state, most facilities set their own internal camera policy and can make written consent a condition of the admission agreement, or decline to allow a camera at all, since no state law overrides that discretion in either direction.
If a family installs a camera anyway, without a facility policy permitting it, exposure runs through the state's general wiretap and voyeurism law rather than a nursing-home-specific statute, the same one-party or all-party consent framework that governs a recording made in any other shared living space. See US Recording Laws by State for how that framework works state by state. A roommate's own privacy interest in a shared room is a real, live issue in a no-statute state, with no nursing-home-specific rule available to resolve it the way Kansas's, Louisiana's, or Utah's roommate-consent provisions do.
"Electronic monitoring devices, including security cameras and audio devices, may be present to record persons and activities." Notice language required at every facility entrance under Minnesota Statutes § 144.6502 (verified 2026-08-13)
Using Camera Footage as Evidence of Abuse or Neglect
Camera footage that appears to show abuse or neglect can support a report to the state's long-term care ombudsman or Adult Protective Services, and it can support a civil claim. Illinois's statute specifically addresses using monitoring recordings in abuse or neglect proceedings, which is one reason lawmakers cite for these laws beyond a family's peace of mind. Footage on its own does not establish that a claim is viable; it is typically reviewed alongside the resident's medical and facility records, the care plan, staffing records, and billing history. For a broader look at how a nursing home abuse or neglect claim works, see Nursing Home Abuse & Neglect.
Harmed by a product or exposure? Speak with an attorney about your options
If you or a loved one may have been harmed, you can speak with an attorney about your legal options at no cost. Whether you have a claim depends on the specific facts. This is attorney advertising, not a guarantee that you qualify or of any particular outcome.
Related Resources
- Surveillance Camera Laws by State covers the general legal framework for security cameras, hidden cameras, and audio consent that applies outside a nursing home setting.
- Nanny Cam Laws covers the closely related question of recording a caregiver inside a private home.
- Landlord Security Camera Laws covers what cameras a landlord may install in a shared or rented living space, a useful comparison for a facility's common-area cameras.
- Workplace Surveillance Camera Laws covers when a facility can record its own staff.
- Nursing Home Abuse & Neglect covers how an abuse or neglect claim works once evidence, including camera footage, is in hand.
- US Recording Laws by State covers the general one-party and all-party consent framework that applies in the roughly 32 states without a nursing-home-specific camera statute.
Last updated: 2026-08-13.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is it legal to put a camera in a nursing home room?
In the 18 states with an electronic-monitoring law, yes, generally at the resident's or representative's request, usually with roommate consent and posted notice. In the other states, the facility's own policy controls, and no state or federal law creates a right to install one.
Can a nursing home in New Jersey stop me from installing a camera?
New Jersey has no statute giving residents a right to a camera. The state's Safe Care Cam program lends micro-surveillance cameras to families who suspect abuse, but a facility that declines a camera outside that program is not violating a New Jersey statute.
Does Arizona let families put cameras in nursing home rooms?
No Arizona statute creates a right to install one. SB 1564, signed by Governor Hobbs in June 2026, only requires long-term care facilities to disclose to the state health department whether they allow monitoring devices; each facility still sets its own policy on whether to allow one.
What happens if my roommate refuses to consent to the camera?
It depends on the state. Louisiana and New Mexico require the facility to offer to move one of the residents to another shared room. Kansas lets the facility deactivate the device if a roommate withdraws consent and the resident does not remove it. Check the specific state's rule in the table above.
Can a nursing home retaliate against a resident for requesting a camera?
States with an enacted electronic-monitoring statute generally bar the facility from refusing admission, discharging, or otherwise retaliating against a resident over a monitoring request. That statutory protection does not exist in a state with no electronic-monitoring law.
Is it a crime to unplug or block a nursing home camera?
New Mexico is the only state in this group that makes intentionally tampering with, obstructing, or destroying a monitoring device a felony. North Dakota treats the same conduct as a class B misdemeanor. Most other states with a statute handle interference through civil correction orders, fines, or a licensing complaint rather than a criminal charge.
Can nursing home camera footage be used as evidence in a lawsuit?
Footage can support an abuse or neglect investigation or claim, and Illinois's statute specifically addresses using monitoring recordings in abuse and neglect proceedings. A recording alone does not establish that a claim is viable; it is evaluated alongside medical, staffing, and care-plan records.
Does my state have a nursing home camera law?
As of August 2026, 18 states do: Connecticut, Illinois, Kansas, Louisiana, Minnesota, Missouri, Nevada, New Mexico, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, and Wyoming. See the table above for each state's specific consent, roommate-consent, and notice rules.
Updates
Corrected the Oklahoma citation to its current 2020 renumbering, replaced an inaccurate claim that Nevada's law is unlike every other state's, filled in the Nevada and North Dakota roommate-consent and notice rules from their statutes, and extended the Louisiana citation range to cover the signage and penalty provisions.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Added Oregon's temporary assisted-living monitoring rule (OAR 411-054-0025(10), effective Aug 10 2026, expires Feb 5 2027) and clarified that Washington's rule is a regulation rather than a statute
Corrected the enacted-statute state list: removed Michigan (the cited MCL 333.21788/2022 PA 187 was fabricated; Michigan has no enacted statute, only a pending bill, SB 412), reclassified Virginia from regulation-only to its actual statute (Va. Code § 32.1-138.5:1), and added Wyoming (Wyo. Stat. §§ 35-2-1301 to 35-2-1308), which the list had omitted.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 144: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
§ 144.6502ELECTRONIC MONITORING IN CERTAIN FACILITIESIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
Subdivision 1. Definitions. (a) For the purposes of this section, the terms defined in this subdivision have the meanings given. (b) "Commissioner" means the commissioner of health. (c) "Department" means the Department of Health. (d) "Electronic monitoring" means the placement and use of an electronic monitoring device in the resident's room or private living unit in accordance with this section. (e) "Electronic monitoring device" means a camera or other device that captures, records, or broadcasts audio, video, or both, that is placed in a resident's room or private living unit and is used to monitor the resident or activities in the room or private living unit. (f) "Facility" means a facility that is: (1) licensed as a nursing home under chapter 144A; (2) licensed as a boarding care home under sections 144.50 to 144.56; (3) until August 1, 2021, a housing with services establishment registered under chapter 144D that is either subject to chapter 144G or has a disclosed special unit under section 325F.72; or (4) on or after August 1, 2021, an assisted living facility. (g) "Resident" means a person 18 years of age or older residing in a facility.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at revisor.mn.gov
Also relied on in: Minnesota Surveillance Camera Laws (2026 Guide), Minnesota Nursing Home Camera Laws: Electronic Monitoring Under Minn. Stat. § 144.6502
Code of Virginia, Title 32.1: Health
§ 32.1-138.5:1(Effective pursuant to Acts 2025, c. 432, cl. 2) Electronic monitoring in resident roomsIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
A. As used in this section: "Electronic monitoring" means the use of a surveillance device with a fixed position video camera or audio recording device, or a combination thereof, that is installed in a resident's room and broadcasts or records activities or sounds occurring within the confines of the room. Electronic monitoring shall not include use of a device that enables audio communication into the resident's room from another source. "Family member" means the resident's spouse, parent, stepparent, child, stepchild, brother, sister, half-brother, half-sister, grandparent, or grandchild. "Legal representative" means a person legally responsible for representing or standing in the place of the resident for the conduct of his affairs. This may include a guardian, conservator, attorney-in-fact under durable power of attorney, trustee, or other person expressly named by a court of competent jurisdiction or the resident as his agency in a legal document that specifies the scope of the representative's authority to act. A legal representative may only represent or stand in the place of a resident for the function for which he has legal authority to act. B.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at law.lis.virginia.gov
Also relied on in: Nursing Home Camera Laws by State, Virginia Nursing Home Camera Laws: Electronic Monitoring Rights
Kansas Statutes Annotated, Chapter 39: DEPENDENT PERSONS AND PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES; SOCIAL WELFARE
§ 39-981Authorized electronic monitoring; reasonable accommodations; notice; consent; use as evidence; prohibitions.In forcecited in 3 of our articles
(a) As used in this section: (1) "Adult care home" means the same as defined in K.S.A. 39-923, and amendments thereto; (2) "authorized electronic monitoring" means the placement of one or more electronic monitoring devices in the room of an adult care home resident and making recordings with such devices after notifying the adult care home of the resident's intent to conduct electronic monitoring; (3) "electronic monitoring device" means a surveillance instrument used to broadcast or record activity or sound occurring in a room, including a video surveillance camera or an audio device designed to acquire communications or other sounds occurring in the room, but not to intercept wire or electronic communications; and (4) "resident's room" means a room in an adult care home that is used as a resident's private living quarters. (b) A resident shall be permitted to conduct authorized electronic monitoring in the resident's room subject to the requirements of this section. (c) An adult care home shall not discharge or refuse to admit a resident or person or otherwise retaliate against a resident or person based on conducting or consenting to authorized electronic monitoring.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ksrevisor.gov
Also relied on in: Kansas Nursing Home Camera Laws: Authorized Electronic Monitoring Under K.S.A. 39-981
Revised Statutes of Missouri, Title XII (PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE), Chapter 198
§ 198.610Citation of law — definitions.In forcecited in 3 of our articles
1. The provisions of sections 198.610 to 198.632 shall be known and may be cited as the "Authorized Electronic Monitoring in Long-Term Care Facilities Act". 2. For purposes of sections 198.610 to 198.632, the following terms shall mean: (1) "Authorized electronic monitoring", the placement and use of an electronic monitoring device by a resident in his or her room in accordance with the provisions of sections 198.610 to 198.632; (2) "Department", the department of health and senior services; (3) "Electronic monitoring device", a surveillance instrument capable of recording or transmitting audio or video footage of any activity occurring in a resident's room; (4) "Facility" or "long-term care facility", any residential care facility, assisted living facility, intermediate care facility, or skilled nursing facility, as such terms are defined under section 198.006; (5) "Guardian", the same meaning as defined under section 475.010; (6) "Legal representative", a person authorized under a durable power of attorney that complies with sections 404.700 to 404.737 to act on behalf of a resident of a facility; (7) "Resident", a person residing in a facility.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at revisor.mo.gov
Also relied on in: Missouri Surveillance Camera Laws (2026 Guide), Missouri Nursing Home Camera Laws: RSMo §§ 198.610-198.632 Electronic Monitoring
Utah Code, Title 26B: Utah Health and Human Services Code
§ 26B-2-236Monitoring device -- Installation, notice, and consent -- Admission and discharge -- Liability.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
(1) As used in this section: (a) "Facility" means: (i) an assisted living facility; or (ii) a secure memory care unit inside of: (A) a nursing care facility; or (B) any other medical or mental health facility. (b) "Legal representative" means an individual who is legally authorized to make health care decisions on behalf of another individual. (c) (i) "Monitoring device" means: (A) a video surveillance camera; or (B) a microphone or other device that captures audio. (ii) "Monitoring device" does not include: (A) a device that is specifically intended to intercept wire, electronic, or oral communication without notice to or the consent of a party to the communication; or (B) a device that is connected to the Internet or that is set up to transmit data via an electronic communication. (d) "Resident" means an individual who receives health care from a facility. (e) "Room" means a resident's private or shared primary living space. (f) "Roommate" means an individual sharing a room with a resident.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at le.utah.gov
Also relied on in: Utah Nursing Home Camera Laws: Monitoring Device Rights
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Minnesota Statutes § 144.6502, Electronic Monitoring in Long-Term Care Facilities(revisor.mn.gov).gov
- Washington Administrative Code 388-97-0400, Electronic Monitoring(app.leg.wa.gov).gov
- Code of Virginia § 32.1-138.5:1, Electronic Monitoring in Resident Rooms(law.lis.virginia.gov).gov
- Missouri Revised Statutes § 198.610, Authorized Electronic Monitoring in Long-Term Care Facilities Act(revisor.mo.gov).gov
- Texas Health and Safety Code, Chapter 242, Subchapter R, Electronic Monitoring of Resident's Room(statutes.capitol.texas.gov).gov
- Illinois Department on Aging, Authorized Electronic Monitoring Brochure(ilaging.illinois.gov).gov
- Ohio Department of Aging, Esther's Law(aging.ohio.gov).gov
- Utah Code § 26B-2-236, Monitoring Devices in Assisted Living Facilities and Secure Memory Care Units(le.utah.gov).gov
- Connecticut Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program, Resident Technology and Camera Use in Long Term Care(portal.ct.gov).gov
- New Jersey Division of Consumer Affairs, Safe Care Cam Program(njconsumeraffairs.gov).gov
- Arizona SB 1564 (2026), Electronic Monitoring; Long-Term Care(azleg.gov).gov
- New Mexico Patient Care Monitoring Act, NMSA 1978, Chapter 24, Article 26 (analysis)(pksdnm.com)
- Fox5 Las Vegas, New Nevada law allows cameras in assisted living facilities(fox5vegas.com)
- Connecticut Public, New CT law allows for cameras in residential care facilities(ctpublic.org)
- Wyoming Statutes §§ 35-2-1301 to 35-2-1308, Long-term Care Electronic Monitoring Act(wyoleg.gov).gov
- Nevada Revised Statutes §§ 449A.182 and 449A.190, Electronic Communication Devices in Facilities for Long-Term Care(leg.state.nv.us)
- Louisiana Revised Statutes § 40:1193.5, Consent; waiver(legis.la.gov)
- Louisiana Revised Statutes § 40:1193.9, Public notice; signage of electronic monitoring device(legis.la.gov)
- North Dakota Century Code § 50-10.2-02.1, Authorized Virtual Monitoring, Virtual Visitation, and Electronic Recording(ndlegis.gov)
- Oklahoma Statutes Title 63 §§ 1-1956.1 to 1-1956.7, Authorized Electronic Monitoring (renumbered from §§ 1-1953.1 to 1-1953.7 by Laws 2020, c. 39)(oklegislature.gov)