Kansas
Kansas Nursing Home Camera Laws: Authorized Electronic Monitoring Under K.S.A. 39-981
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 14, 2026). · 3 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Kansas gives a resident of an adult care home, a category that explicitly includes assisted living facilities, or their guardian or legal representative, the right to request authorized electronic monitoring in the resident's own room, under K.S.A. 39-981.
Information last verified on 2026-08-14. This article has not yet been reviewed by a licensed lawyer.
This article covers Kansas's electronic monitoring statute, K.S.A. 39-981, within Chapter 39, Article 9's Adult Care Homes provisions. It does not cover Kansas's general one-party consent recording law in full, which has its own dedicated page linked below.
What Kansas's Electronic Monitoring Law Grants
A resident, or the resident's guardian or legal representative, may request authorized electronic monitoring by notifying the facility on a form prescribed by the secretary for aging and disability services. The right applies to an "adult care home," a term defined by cross-reference to K.S.A. 39-923.
The Liability Release Built Into the Request Form
That form carries one term that cuts against the resident, and it is written into the statute rather than added by the facility. K.S.A. 39-981(d)(1) requires the resident, or the resident's guardian or legal representative, to "release the adult care home from any civil liability for a violation of the resident's privacy rights in connection with the use of the electronic monitoring device." By its terms the release reaches privacy-rights claims connected to the device, not other claims, but it is a condition of exercising the monitoring right and there is no version of the form without it.
The same subsection requires three other things of the form: that the resident be informed of the proper procedures for reporting complaints as outlined by the Kansas Department for Aging and Disability Services, that a resident using a video surveillance camera choose up front whether the camera will always be unobstructed or will be obstructed in specified circumstances to protect the resident's dignity, and that a resident in a multi-resident room obtain roommate consent on a separate prescribed form. The adult care home must provide a copy of the completed form to the resident, to any roommate, and to the office of the state long-term care ombudsman.
Does Kansas's Law Cover Assisted Living?
Yes, explicitly. K.S.A. 39-923 defines "adult care home" to mean "any nursing facility, nursing facility for mental health, intermediate care facility for people with intellectual disability, assisted living facility, residential healthcare facility, home plus, boarding care home and adult day care facility" required to be licensed by the secretary for aging and disability services. Assisted living facility is one of eight named categories, so an assisted living resident in Kansas has the same electronic-monitoring right as a nursing facility resident.
Roommate Consent and Withdrawal
In a multi-resident room, the requesting resident must obtain written consent from the other room residents on a prescribed form. Consent may be withdrawn by the resident, the resident's guardian or legal representative, or any roommate, at any time. If consent is withdrawn and the device is not disabled by the party who withdrew it, the facility may turn the device off itself. If a new roommate moves in, the resident must obtain that new roommate's consent before monitoring can resume.
What Happens If a Roommate Says No
A refusal is not the end of the request. K.S.A. 39-981(e) requires an adult care home to make reasonable physical accommodations for authorized electronic monitoring, and subsection (e)(3) lists among them "making reasonable accommodations if a resident in a multi-resident room wishes to conduct electronic monitoring pursuant to this section and the resident or residents with whom the resident shares the room do not consent to the monitoring, including offering to move the resident who wishes to conduct electronic monitoring to another shared room that is available or becomes available."
Subsection (e)(4) imposes the same duty in the other direction, requiring reasonable accommodations when a new resident who does not consent begins living in the room. So the practical next step after a roommate declines is to ask the facility in writing for the accommodation the statute requires, including a room change, rather than treating the refusal as a permanent bar. The same subsection also obliges the facility to provide a reasonably secure place to mount the device and access to power sources for it.

The Video/Audio and Dignity Election
Kansas builds an unusually granular set of resident-controlled options into the statute. A resident can elect to prohibit video recording, prohibit audio recording, or restrict both separately, and can block the visual component of the recording during specific dignity-sensitive activities. That is more control over the audio and video components independently than most state monitoring statutes give a resident.
Notice and Signage
The facility must post a conspicuous notice at the entrance to the adult care home and at each resident's own room stating that some residents' rooms may be electronically monitored, a dual-location signage requirement that goes beyond a single entrance sign.
Who Pays for the Device
"A resident, or such resident's guardian or legal representative, shall pay all costs associated with installing and maintaining an electronic monitoring device."
Retaliation and Refusal-to-Admit Ban
Kansas law is direct on this point: "An adult care home shall not discharge or refuse to admit a resident or person or otherwise retaliate against a resident or person based on conducting or consenting to authorized electronic monitoring."
Tampering Penalties
Interfering with a device carries a tiered penalty structure. Knowingly hindering, obstructing, or destroying a device is a class B nonperson misdemeanor. If the conduct is intended to conceal a misdemeanor, it becomes a class A nonperson misdemeanor. If intended to conceal a felony, it becomes a severity level 8 nonperson felony.

Using Recordings as Evidence
Courts may not admit a recording unless video shows the time and date and the recording is unedited and unenhanced, no artificial enhancement of the footage. Footage that appears to show abuse or neglect can support a report to the Kansas Department for Aging and Disability Services or the state's Long-Term Care Ombudsman program, and it can support a civil claim.
Harmed by a product or exposure? Speak with an attorney about your options
If you or a loved one may have been harmed, you can speak with an attorney about your legal options at no cost. Whether you have a claim depends on the specific facts. This is attorney advertising, not a guarantee that you qualify or of any particular outcome.
Camera vs. Microphone: Kansas's Consent Law
Kansas is a one-party consent state for recording generally: see Kansas Recording Laws for the full framework. Because a resident present in their own room and consenting to their own device satisfies the general one-party rule for their own conversations, the added value of K.S.A. 39-981's own separate audio-restriction election is mainly about the resident's own preference and dignity, not a gap the general consent law leaves open. A device capturing a conversation the resident is not part of, such as staff talking to each other, is still governed by the general one-party rule independently.
Installing a Camera in a Kansas Adult Care Home
- Confirm the facility is an adult care home, which covers assisted living as well as nursing facilities.
- Submit the secretary-prescribed request form, and read it before signing. K.S.A. 39-981(d)(1) makes releasing the adult care home from civil liability for privacy-rights violations connected to the device a required term of that form.
- Obtain roommate consent in writing, including any video-only or audio-only restriction the resident wants. If a roommate declines, ask the facility for the accommodation K.S.A. 39-981(e)(3) requires, including an offer to move the monitoring resident to another shared room that is available or becomes available.
- Confirm signage is posted at both the facility entrance and the resident's own room.
- Budget for the ongoing cost, which falls entirely on the resident or family.
If You Suspect Abuse or Neglect
Kansas residents and families can report suspected abuse or neglect to the Kansas Department for Aging and Disability Services or to the state's Long-Term Care Ombudsman program. That federally backed ombudsman program, operating in every state under the Older Americans Act, investigates complaints about action or inaction that may adversely affect a resident's health, safety, welfare, or rights, and covers assisted living residents as well as nursing facility residents.

Related Resources
- Nursing Home Camera Laws by State covers the national picture across all 18 statute states.
- Kansas Recording Laws covers Kansas's general one-party consent rule for audio recording.
- Nursing Home Abuse & Neglect covers how an abuse or neglect claim works once evidence, including camera footage, is in hand.
Last updated: 2026-08-14.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a resident install a camera in a Kansas nursing home or assisted living facility?
Yes. K.S.A. 39-981 gives a resident of an adult care home, or their guardian or legal representative, the right to request authorized electronic monitoring. Adult care home is defined broadly under K.S.A. 39-923 to include assisted living facilities as well as nursing and intermediate care facilities.
Does Kansas's electronic monitoring law cover assisted living?
Yes. K.S.A. 39-923 lists assisted living facility as one of eight facility types included in the statutory term adult care home, which K.S.A. 39-981 uses to define which facilities the monitoring right applies to.
Do you have to sign away any rights to install a camera in a Kansas adult care home?
Yes, in part. K.S.A. 39-981(d)(1) requires the secretary-prescribed request form to have the resident, guardian, or legal representative release the adult care home from any civil liability for a violation of the resident's privacy rights in connection with the use of the monitoring device. By its terms the release covers privacy-rights claims connected to the device, and it is a required term of the form rather than something the facility adds.
Does a roommate have to consent to a camera in a Kansas facility room?
Yes, in writing, using a prescribed form. But a refusal is not final. K.S.A. 39-981(e)(3) requires the facility to make reasonable accommodations when a roommate does not consent, including offering to move the resident who wants to monitor to another shared room that is available or becomes available, and (e)(4) applies the same duty when a non-consenting new roommate moves in. Consent can be withdrawn at any time by the resident, the resident's guardian or legal representative, or the roommate, and if withdrawn without the device being disabled, the facility may turn it off.
Can a Kansas resident choose to record video only, not audio, in a nursing home camera?
Yes. Kansas's law lets a resident elect to prohibit video recording, prohibit audio recording, or both separately, and to block the camera's visual component during dignity-sensitive activities, an unusually granular set of controls compared to most other states.
Can a Kansas adult care home retaliate against a resident for requesting a camera?
No. K.S.A. 39-981 bars a facility from discharging, refusing to admit, or otherwise retaliating against a resident or person based on conducting or consenting to authorized electronic monitoring.
What is the penalty for tampering with a monitoring device in Kansas?
A class B nonperson misdemeanor for knowingly hindering, obstructing, or destroying a device, rising to a class A nonperson misdemeanor if intended to conceal a misdemeanor, and a severity level 8 nonperson felony if intended to conceal a felony.
Updates
Added the K.S.A. 39-981(d)(1) civil-liability release that the request form requires and the roommate-refusal accommodation remedy under K.S.A. 39-981(e)(3)-(4), and removed an unsupported cross-state comparison of the tampering penalty.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Kansas Statutes Annotated, Chapter 39: DEPENDENT PERSONS AND PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES; SOCIAL WELFARE
§ 39-981Authorized electronic monitoring; reasonable accommodations; notice; consent; use as evidence; prohibitions.In forcecited in 3 of our articles
(a) As used in this section: (1) "Adult care home" means the same as defined in K.S.A. 39-923, and amendments thereto; (2) "authorized electronic monitoring" means the placement of one or more electronic monitoring devices in the room of an adult care home resident and making recordings with such devices after notifying the adult care home of the resident's intent to conduct electronic monitoring; (3) "electronic monitoring device" means a surveillance instrument used to broadcast or record activity or sound occurring in a room, including a video surveillance camera or an audio device designed to acquire communications or other sounds occurring in the room, but not to intercept wire or electronic communications; and (4) "resident's room" means a room in an adult care home that is used as a resident's private living quarters. (b) A resident shall be permitted to conduct authorized electronic monitoring in the resident's room subject to the requirements of this section. (c) An adult care home shall not discharge or refuse to admit a resident or person or otherwise retaliate against a resident or person based on conducting or consenting to authorized electronic monitoring.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ksrevisor.gov
Also relied on in: Nursing Home Camera Laws by State, Nursing Home Camera Laws by State (2026): Granny Cam Rights
§ 39-923Definitions.In force
(a) As used in this act: (1) "Adult care home" means any nursing facility, nursing facility for mental health, intermediate care facility for people with intellectual disability, assisted living facility, residential healthcare facility, home plus, boarding care home and adult day care facility, all of which are classifications of adult care homes and are required to be licensed by the secretary for aging and disability services. (2) "Nursing facility" means any place or facility operating 24 hours a day, seven days a week, caring for six or more individuals not related within the third degree of relationship to the administrator or owner by blood or marriage and who, due to functional impairments, need skilled nursing care to compensate for activities of daily living limitations.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ksrevisor.gov
Cited in 11 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- BOSWELL, D/B/A RENO COUNTY ADULT CARE HOME v. Harkins (Supreme Court of Kansas 1982, 230 Kan. 610)“…urposes of state licensure pursuant to authority granted in K.S.A. 39-923 et seq. (All statutory ref…”
- Presbyterian Manors, Inc. v. Douglas County (Supreme Court of Kansas 2000, 268 Kan. 488)“…sing home facility is currently licensed in accordance with K.S.A. 39-923. “. . . Presbyterian Manor[s] is…”
- Boswell, Inc. D/B/A Broadacres v. Harkins (Supreme Court of Kansas 1982, 230 Kan. 738)“…to consider the law and the regulations in their entirety. K.S.A. 39-923(c)(3) (Ensley) fully defines an interme…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
United States Code Title 42
§ 3058gState Long-Term Care Ombudsman programIn forcecited in 12 of our articles
In order to be eligible to receive an allotment under section 3058b of this title from funds appropriated under section 3058a of this title and made available to carry out this subpart, a State agency shall, in accordance with this section— establish and operate an Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman; and carry out through the Office a State Long-Term Care Ombudsman program. The Office shall be headed by an individual, to be known as the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, who shall be selected from among individuals with expertise and experience in the fields of long-term care and advocacy. The Ombudsman shall be responsible for the management, including the fiscal management, of the Office.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 18 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2022
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Rackley v. Fairview Care Centers, Inc. (2001) held 42 U.S.C. 3058g(a)(3) and (5) govern the ombudsman office's duties and do not state a public policy clear enough to support a wrongful discharge claim. Northwestern Illinois Area Agency on Aging v. Basta (2022) applied 3058g(f) to uphold a state conflict of interest form.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Puerto Rico Office of the Ombudsman for the Elderly Ex Rel. Leon v. Puerto Rico (District Court, D. Puerto Rico 2009, 665 F. Supp. 2d 74)“…an enforceable right under § 1983). PROOE also cites 42 U.S.C. § 3058g(j), in support of its proposition that…”
- Newman v. Kelly (District Court, District of Columbia 1994, 848 F. Supp. 228)“…uant to the federal Older Americans Act Amendments of 1992, 42 U.S.C. § 3058g, Pub.L. No. 102-375, § 712 , 106 Stat…”
- Northwestern Illinois Area Agency on Aging v. Basta (Appellate Court of Illinois 2022, 468 Ill. Dec. 773)✓An area agency on aging argued a state ombudsman conflict-of-interest form was a rule needing rulemaking. Reading 42 U.S.C. 3058g(f) as putting the duty to identify conflicts on the state agency, the court held the form merely exercised that duty, so no rulemaking was required.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Arkansas Nursing Home Camera Laws: SB616 and What Applies Today, Hawaii Nursing Home Camera Laws: No Statute, Private-Place Risk, Indiana Nursing Home Camera Laws: No Statute After SB 378 Died
United States Code Title 18
§ 2511Interception and disclosure of wire, oral, or electronic communications prohibitedIn forcecited in 422 of our articles
Except as otherwise specifically provided in this chapter any person who— intentionally intercepts, endeavors to intercept, or procures any other person to intercept or endeavor to intercept, any wire, oral, or electronic communication; intentionally uses, endeavors to use, or procures any other person to use or endeavor to use any electronic, mechanical, or other device to intercept any oral communication when— such device is affixed to, or otherwise transmits a signal through, a wire, cable, or other like connection used in wire communication; or such device transmits communications by radio, or interferes with the transmission of such communication; or such person knows, or has reason to know, that such device or any component thereof has been sent through the mail or transported in interstate or foreign commerce; or such use or endeavor to use (A) takes place on the premises of any business or other commercial establishment the operations of which affect interstate or foreign commerce; or (B) obtains or is for the purpose of obtaining information relating to the operations of any business or other commercial establishment the operations of which affect interstate or foreign…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 2,045 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Griggs-Ryan v. Smith (1990) applied the Section 2511(2)(d) prior-consent exception, treating a tenant repeatedly told that all incoming calls were taped as having impliedly consented. United States v. United States District Court (1972) read the then-current Section 2511(3) as conferring no presidential surveillance power.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Mitchell v. Forsyth (Supreme Court of the United States 1985, 472 U.S. 511)✓The Attorney General authorized a warrantless 1970 national security wiretap that caught the plaintiff's calls; the Court held the since-repealed Section 2511(3) disclaimer left the tap lawful under Title III, and that Mitchell had qualified immunity.
- United States v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan (Supreme Court of the United States 1972, 407 U.S. 297)✓The Attorney General approved warrantless wiretaps on members of a domestic group accused of bombing a CIA office; the Court read Section 2511(3) as a congressional disclaimer conferring no surveillance power, then held the Fourth Amendment required prior judicial approval.
- Forsyth v. Barr (Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit 1994, 19 F.3d 1527)✓Dallas police used, in an internal affairs probe of an officer, calls private parties allegedly intercepted illegally; assuming that was unlawful, the Fifth Circuit held Section 2517(1) and (2) allowed the disclosure and use, defeating the Section 2511(1)(c) and (d) claims.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Connecticut Recording Laws (2026): Hybrid Consent Rules Explained, Oregon Recording Laws (2026): Hybrid One-Party and All-Party Rules, US Recording Laws by State (2026): All 50 States Explained
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- K.S.A. 39-981, Authorized electronic monitoring(ksrevisor.gov).gov
- K.S.A. 39-923, Adult care home definitions(ksrevisor.gov).gov
- 18 U.S.C. § 2511, federal Wiretap Act, one-party consent exception(law.cornell.edu)
- Administration for Community Living, State Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program(acl.gov).gov
- 42 U.S.C. § 3058g, Older Americans Act, State Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program(law.cornell.edu)